I just want to try this game ::|

CS:GO will be sucsess, belive or not, i see that you played this game a little bit and you didn't like it.I guess that you will need some time to adapt, after all this game can be fixed.It's far far away from perfect, but if we try to help to upgrade this game, it can be very good and playable.In this moment game is fast and funny, with more updates it will become better and better after every update.Afterall sponsors are crucial factor of game sucsess, if they like it we can do nothing about it....

btw, agree with you, CS:GO is crap at this point. The recoil is just all WRONG, they nailed the recoil in cs 1.6 PERFECTLY! it was as close to real life as possible, but in CS:GO its just crap..

My thoughts: CS:GO will fail if Valve do not take advice from CS 1.6 PROS not only some source dudes.

old news dude.

sure they make cs:go and when half-life 3 will been relased they make cs:2

Only what they need to do is to change movement and recoil to the same as in CS 1.6, and the game will be better and better, end.

+1 you don't need any tactic/skill in CS:GO its just a run,shoot and kill game ..

Give it time, it's still a Beta. I'm sure many players will play it in the future.

"Community doesn't create game, game creates community."

So true! It`s hard for us to accept it, but cs:go will work absolutely different. I hope, that developers will be modifying it as long as possible, and after few mounths it will be "quite" playable game (it means that it will be "quite" similar to CS 1.6 :)).

Message to haters:
The only chance for CS:GO is us - community. Due to it, let`s try it before we will hate it! It`s sick, that there are triply more haters than beta keys! Give it a chance!

Stop post stupid thread like this. The game is cool, it's not 1.6 - yea, but do your really need just 1.6 with only new textures? Just take a look at promod, it's terrible. It's the wrong way. We need a new game, with old conception, and we will get it, just wait.

Post edited 2012-04-13 21:21:40

Why are people pinning hopes on CS2, if CS:GO fails, I would imagine CS2 will not happen anytime soon (I would imagine most likely a 10 year gap).

You really want to risk the future of CS with hating CS:GO?

They said it's not a replace for Cs 1.6. Anyways I'm looking forward to it.

The game is bad in all aspects, maybe it will be good on PS3 only, but on PCs, Battlefield and CoD series still 10x better. CS 1.6 has the addiction factor on level AAA+, CS:GO have C-

there will be CS 2 or not?

:(

New CS is a future and I think that ESL, ESWC and others will change 1.6 for GO

You just need a better gun than your opponent? That also applies to CS 1.6?

Looks like you people still don't understand the meaning of the word "beta."

They've been updating cs:go fairly regularly. Instead of whining on forums about how bad it is, why don't you actually provide some constructive criticism?

Also, anything lurppis says is to be taken with a grain of salt. Kid cries about everything.

I played Counter-Strike when it first came out as version 1.0, started to play it more constantly around 2006 and i that consider myself an old 1.6 fan has to admitt that this game is becoming better and better. I played it when the beta first came out and the dirfference now is huge, i think this game will be awesome!

It's fun, I tried it.

I think it can be the new cs, btw it's "serious" not "Seriuzzzeee"

i don't like this game because my computer cannot handle it

Are you SERIUS?

Nah.. But i'm serious :-)))

there was an update today, most of the guns got a buff. the first few bullets are more close packed, less random spread. Meaning, we can finally burst 4 shots. we can also tap 5 shots and be accurate. game got alot better!

I hope that every patch for GO is step forward and not like one step forward two steps back, like many games even up today does that stupid mistake. Wasting your time to make even more people unsatisfied, seems legit...

Even valve said that this is not Counter Strike 2. Half of the community thinks this game gonna change esports but actually read some news before writing anything stupid

this game suck$

i dont think about it as next counter-strike, but another new game and it is not that bad actually, and lot of my friends was sayin its shit all the time till they try it and now they play it more than other games..ofc, valve has still alot to do. but people, before you start sayin how this game sucks, try it and try not to compare with cs 1.6 or source, please.

Post edited 2012-04-17 12:46:27

CS:GO is a pretty good game but it cant change 1.6

It is more to play for fun.

the game is not bad... its fun.... but to think abt playing competitively, i dun think it will happen anytime soon.....

Unbelievable.
I thought this game was total crap.
It is worse than that.
Recoil is ridiculous.
It reminds me of water pistols at the beach.
Have you ever played HL ?
HL 2 ? CS 1.5 ? CS 1.6 ?
You understand.
I am not even sur my 8 year olld kid would like it
and prefer it to Mario Kart.
Atmosphere (compare to Condition Zero) haas been lost. Even terrorists do not seem very fit and shoul first go for weight watcher training camp.
Play Aztec on Condition Zero and compare.
When rain falls in Aztec/Condition Zero, there is a small amount of vapor due to heat. Art.
No match.
I will uninstall this CS GO game this evening.

You nailed it.

There is nothing in that game that would make you to say "God I love CS".

for those of you who are lazy to click the source link above to the article below. here is the sneak peak.

Valve had expected the 2004 Source version of the game to replace the previous year's 1.6 iteration, itself a successor to a game that had been evolving since the late 90's. But many of 1.6's most ardent fans, including those who played it competitively, as a sport, resisted the Source version. Source "didn't do what we thought it would do, but we weren't disappointed about what it did," Magal said. "We thought Counter-Strike: Source would replaced Counter-Strike 1.6 but instead it generated a community just as large as the 1.6 community on its own."

Faliszek called it "an amoeba-like split."

GO is supposed to bring those crowds together and rope in console players who have only had an original Xbox version to choose from. Valve also assumes it has lost some computer Counter-Strike gamers who have moved away from PC gaming and wants to reach them on the consoles those gamers may have moved to (fittingly, the PS3 version of the game will even include mouse and keyboard support; and all players on PS3/PC/Mac will be match-made against each other.)

The Valve guys describe two of the goals for GO as lowering the skill floor—making it easier for newbies to have fun with game, hence the casual mode—and raising the skill ceiling—making meaningful, subtle changes to maps and mechanics that only pro-level players will notice and appreciate.

Valve is not trying to necessarily turn GO into an e-Sport. "That requirement doesn't exist," Magal said. "If it happens, that's nice." They do want to make sure those highest-level players can enjoy GO, though, so Valve is launching a PC beta for the game in October and having what Magal calls an ongoing "dialogue" with hardcore CS players "to fix the things that everyone agrees is an issue." For example: "The way the smoke grenades used to work in Counter-Strike: Source. We changed the rate at which it blooms and dissipates and everyone preferred it." And another example, also from Magal: "The maps Dust and Aztec aren't played competitively at all because they were so imbalanced in Source. We feel very bullish on changing them, so we did. Dust 2 is a wonderfully balanced map that we didn't need to change. We just gave it a visual upgrade."

And then there are the Halo and Call of Duty gamers out there, the FPS hordes who may wonder why a new Counter-Strike is at all relevant to them. What's the appeal of CS:GO for that crowd who already have plenty of first-person shooting to do in their favorite series? CS may have sold 25 million copies already (according to Faliszek), but Valve might still have trouble pulling those folks from their beloved franchises. What's a CS have to offer those people?

Magal describes the essence and value of CS in one word: skill. "I think where Counter-Strike differentiates itself is what impact skill has on your success."

It's the way skill factors into a CS match that makes it feel different from other shooters, Faliszek added. "It's clean. You died because you made the wrong choice." He explained that beginner CS players tend to use lots of grenades, but that veterans don't since it is "super-easy" to kill a player who is holding one. "There's not a lot of spam in there," he said. "There are a lot of clean kills. Most kills are gun kills. And it's about, 'Oh I didn't check that corner before I entered this room. I made the bad choice of trying to defuse the bomb before clearing the area. We rushed around this corner and we got ambushed.' It's always about making those kinds of decisions and not about, ‘Oh man, why did I die? What the hell? That's bullshit kind of thing."

"A small difference in skill between two players, the impact of that on the game will be accentuated," Magal said. "My experience in other games is that's not the case."

If valve can't Get_Right counter-strike, they are really bad developers.

Counter-strike needs 1.6 movement and size scaling, 1.6 sound, and a blend of the graphics from all 3 games.

Maps need to be more like quake maps, in the sense that you can strafe against walls without getting stuck on a crack due a non-functioning door for decoration, no more of this edgy catchy bullshit.

Aim / recoil needs to be like 1.6, and they need to make it register well online.

Sounds pretty do-able.

1xx hours cs:go
pc fast enought, 2xx fps under any circustance

random recoil
horrible maps
terrible skins
no comments about movement

welcome to new fps era, valve and the four guys
earning money .. need you

HELP HELP HELP