Run CS:GO ?
Guys I have a pc with these specifications :
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P8600 @ 2.40GHz
4gb RAM
Win 7 32bits
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500/5100 Series :
Dedicated Video RAM : 512mb
Vertex Shader version : 4.1
Pixel Shader version : 4.1
(50 replies)
Created 2012-08-18 23:05 by: destruFF
Can I run CS:GO ?
2012-08-18 23:05:43
Yes ofc
2012-08-18 23:06:48
Yes you can, with decent FPS i guess. :)
2012-08-18 23:09:39
Yea, but i would highly recommend that you change CPU + GPU for an fps > 60 if i'm not mistaken
2012-08-18 23:10:12
you can run it but it will probably be low fps
2012-08-18 23:15:11
I have an another pc with :
Intel Core i5 480M 2.66Ghz with turbo boost up to 2.93Ghz
5gb Ram DDR3
Radeon 6370M
Can I run it with a high fps ?
2012-08-18 23:19:30
possibly with low graphics settings, wouldn't expect anything >150fps, but someone can correct me if i'm wrong
2012-08-18 23:31:05
on this computer you have ~200 fps
2012-08-18 23:45:54
wasn't u cheering for CS 1.6?

gayish.
2012-08-19 12:21:01
by: tfg
#7
And what about it?

Radeon HD 6850 1024/256
AMD Phenom II x4 955 BE oc to 3,6ghz
4gb 1333mhz ram
win7 x64

cant get stable 120fps(120hz), fps goes down from 120 to 80 fps

any1 here haa similiar pc and stable 120fps?!
Idk if its cause i have 2much shit on hdd or just shitty pc xD
2012-08-18 23:21:07
I have Radeon HD 5700, AMD Phenom II x4 3.01GHz, 3.25GB RAM and same problem with FPS on all resolutions with different settings (50-80 FPS). Valve should fix it!
2012-08-18 23:33:37
replied in #10
2012-08-18 23:33:56
by: tfg
#13
lowest settings in ATI and in CSGO :D
turned off all antyaliasings etc, no difference in fps between maxed setfings and lowest settings
even in 1080p same fps as in 640x480 xD
2012-08-18 23:37:36
are you sure vsync is off?
2012-08-19 01:59:43
by: tfg
#36
yep :D
2012-08-19 10:30:21
Only with low settings probably.
2012-08-18 23:33:26
you should get 120fps easily, even a lot more. i get over 200fps with a worse computer (maybe better processor but worse gfx card...faster ram though and 8gb...)

but it all depends on your settings. i would lower them. the game still looks good with low gfx settings. (you gotta lower them both from csgo and ccc)

edit: oops this was a reply to #7, not for destruFF

Post edited 2012-08-18 23:34:30
2012-08-18 23:33:26
Win 7 32 bits this bad. Use 64 bit version + bad CPU(need overlocked)
You be have ~60 fps

Post edited 2012-08-18 23:41:08
2012-08-18 23:39:11
by: Jonathan E. - HLTV.org
#17
4Gb are quite the limit to choose 32bit or 64bit. And in this case the advantage of using 64bit in order to squeeze just a couple Mb more out of the available RAM don't look that prominent to me.
2012-08-19 00:01:28
You seem to misguided about 32bit vs 64bit. There's a golden rule in IT, does some programs the user have require 32bit? If yes install 32bit.

Does the user have any programs that require 32bit? No? Install 64bit, this is for 4gb + ram. Even if it's just 4GB of ram, it's enough, you get more performence ++ with 64bit if you got 4GB+ ram. Now on the other hand, it also depends on the CPU + motherboard, in this case it's a Laptop (most likely outdated) but I would still install Windows 7 x64 on it.

You might come out with two options when installing Windows 7 x64 bit on an older pc.

A) You're missing 64bit drivers (beep, install 32bit)
B) All drivers sucessfully installed by themselfs (magic)
2012-08-19 03:41:12
i have a computer with a processor 2.1 hehe,, 4gb ram.. and nvidia geforce g105m 512mb.. who is the better? w7 x64 or 32? i use a 32 version!
2012-08-19 03:54:20
by: BeX
#29
If you use 32 version than max ram is 3.25, with 64 version there is no limit. So, yea 64 version is way better.
2012-08-19 04:04:04
yes.. and i some maps i have 60/40 fps! is a sh*t kkk
2012-08-19 04:20:15
by: tfg
#37
disagree.

32 has way less system processes than 64, so, if you have 4gb ram and 32b, okay, system only reads 3.25 and work fine, but when ull install 64, windows will just eat 1,5gb from ur ram, for all this fucking processes, while 32 'eats' only few mb
same situation with me, i had 32 system, with 4gb, i was cryin 'oh god rest of my raaaaaaaam, i want u baaaaaack', then i installed 64 and 32 was working muchhhhhhh faster and better
2012-08-19 10:34:32
and u use now 64? is better for games?
2012-08-19 10:50:45
by: tfg
#40
nah, 32 was way better, more fps for sure
2012-08-19 11:15:36
False, You never go out of memory in theory. This is because of the pagefile which is set default to your memory size. So when you install Windows it auto sets your page file to 4GB. You also have 50% of your RAM cached and 50% to free, this is because if some programs require more RAM, it will free up the cached RAM to that program.
2012-08-19 15:41:46
by: Jonathan E. - HLTV.org
#49
I am sorry to say but I am not sure who set up that golden rule refer to but of what I am sure is that he/she was wrong.

It is not the programs that matter but the hardware.
32bit programs are able to work fine on 64bit. In order to find out if the one you are interested in will you just have to do some trial/error testing. In the end you may be able to find an alternative working one.
In terms of hardware this isn't as 'easy'. Not only of the computer itself but also the one that will interact with it has to have 64bit drivers for it. If not it won't work with the computer. And changing hardware is more expensive than software indeed.

Therefore it is kind of bold to install a 64bit OS on a potentially outdated computer when there is no guarantee of 64bit drivers. If there are for the computer, fine but it isn't an isolated working unit.

And, finally, there is no magic in drivers installing for themselves, they are just available. And them being available is sometimes indeed magic.
2012-08-21 00:11:30
my laptop:
amd athlon tm 64 x2 processor ql-64 (2.1ghz)
ati mobility radeon tm hd 4570 512 mb vram
3 gb memory

1.6 fps - 90-100
css fps - 80-140 with fps cfg and good graphics

how many fps will i have on csgo?

Post edited 2012-08-19 00:01:27
2012-08-18 23:59:02
maximum around 50 I think
2012-08-19 02:34:49
I have the same, max fps 50 maybe cuz is beta.
2012-08-19 00:21:05
haha ive got i7 , 8gb ram ,radeon 7470 1gb and i am playing with 20-40 fps :))) what can i say haha

Post edited 2012-08-19 01:00:11
2012-08-19 00:58:38
Oh my god ! :-(
2012-08-19 00:59:58
I have an i7-3930k @ 4.2ghz + radeon 7970 300fps stable :)
2012-08-19 03:44:36
look your GPU. its total trash. Get 7850 + then we are talking
2012-08-19 13:51:32
I have E2140 GF 8600GT and 60fps in CS:GO
2012-08-19 02:24:27
guys ,wt about this?

intel core 2 duo E7500 @ 2.93Ghz 2CPUs
radeon hd 6770
4gb ram
xp 32bit
video ram:1gb
2012-08-19 03:33:11
about 100-150 fps or more :P
2012-08-19 12:20:10
where are all the CS4FOREVERFUCKCSGO comments gone?
2012-08-19 03:58:49
I'm gonna play it for fun ..
2012-08-19 04:09:17
Like everybody else.
2012-08-19 15:35:53
athlon qcore 3ghz
4gb ram
GT 440
low settings
120~200 fps
2012-08-19 04:08:18
core 2 duo e7500 3.57ghz o.c
4gb ram
gtx 550 ti o.c
medium settings 100-300 fps
2012-08-19 05:50:58
i have E8400 at 3 or 3.5 oc
3 gb ram
gtx 460
2012-08-19 13:44:52
Lets wait for those fps configs ey
2012-08-19 06:15:45
core duo T7500 2.2GHz, 3GB ram, radeon HD 3470. Unplayable
2012-08-19 10:54:05
What about my PC guys?
I want to try GO so badly, but i don't know my PC is enough good for it.. ( for stable ~100 fps)
So my PC:
C2D e4500 2.2 GHz
Gainward 9600 GT 1GB
2 GB RAM
and i use XP 32 bit..
2012-08-19 13:29:05
maybe with low settings
2012-08-19 13:50:35
Intel Core i5 3,3GHz
6GB RAM
Radeon HD7770 1GB

vista, low settings 80fps!

Questions?
2012-08-21 00:43:39
i've got same settings
100/120 fps ingame
2012-08-21 01:23:29
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.