Hi all !
I have small question for you, does anyone of you have graphic card Asus GF 9500 GT 1GB and play CS:GO with it ?
My problem are low FPS in CS:GO, about 70 in Gamemenu and ~50 ingame.
I also had CPU : Intel core 2 quad 2.5 GHz, 6 gb DDR2 RAM 800hz so i wondered if is it posible to GF 9500 be such an sh*ty graphic cart ?
In cs 1.6 ofc i have non stop 100 fps.
my system is Windows 7 64 bit (dont ktow is it important information)
LOL problem in quade core CPU ?
I had 9500 gt, fps was droping all time, on phenom 955be (4x 3.5 GHz)
9500 gt is realy low card, try to buy 6850 if you have money ...
maybe update gpu drivers ? I have dual core 3.2 overclocked and GT 9600 and on 640X480 on medium settings i can go to 220 fps (120~180 most of the time).
seriously, the RAM doesn't really do much to the fps in this case...
And I'm running CS:GO with better fps with intel core 2 2,9GHz dual-core, so the processor is hardly an issue (atleast on lower resolutions)
So its your graphics card, old as your grandparents but it would run the game better if you'd just set it to 640x480 with crappiest visual settings available.
>processor do matter
Ofc it matters, seems like even CS:GO is still a bit processor leaning as have the previous CS-games been.
BUT, I said the processor is enough. Just OC it and it should do the trick. Hardly can believe a game that is able to use quad-cores all threads would get lower fps on the same settings if you would run it on _identical_ chipset otherwise except where the crappier one has a bit higher base clock but the better one has two times the cores and threads.
I never said processor doesnt matter. It simply isn't the one bottlenecking in this system while using low resolutions.
as if... i have 9600gt and i get 60 fps, 4 gb ram, only 2.2ghz shitty old duel core but still the processor wouldnt make a difference of 150fps on a shitty 9600