How could csp replace cs:go as the main esports game?
I honestly dont get it.. a new game with 10 years old graphics, poor gameplay and there arent even molotovs lol.. yeah this is the sh*t people definetly will play! AND its like 90% same as 1.6?
Global Offensive sux and you can't say it's main esports game.
Why? - What about SC2, LoL, Dota or even WoT. Btw check steam games stats. CS:GO isn't main title and it will never be something like that. There is few events atm. but only reason why they are it's because game is new and that's all.
I don't need to watch anything. I played like 50 gathers with well known players and everyone shares the same opinion: Get rid of the molotovs, bring in 2 flashes.
But anyway, my point was: A game isn't bad/good just because there are/aren't molotovs.
Okay, let's say most of them are "well known in Germany". Some are also well known outside of Germany, but I won't tell you any names since I'm not here to represent their opinions.
if you play in your server you can acctualy put the maximum number of granades as 4 and flashes as 2 but yh, it should be in the esl poles, but molotov is quite good, it makes the game more tactical, but the decoy is just stupid :S
every post you make shows your utter stupidity. obvious how much of a source noob you are. you source kids like to bash on 1.6 so much but yet without 1.6 you wouldnt have your trash source games. you all just know that crap source gameplay so you think that crap is how CS is suppose to be. there is a reason 1.6 was used for 10 years even after CSS.
ak 47 your opinion is a noob point of view because for pro player's csp would better because it is more competitive unlike cs go who has bad maps, recoil, money system, hitboxes, ...
Well, i just dont get it. Ive seen hundreds of comments people saying csp will grow larger than CS:GO cause they are making it more competitive, agree? Well why an earth couldnt CS:GO 1000times larger game, improve as well? Why does CSP have MORE changes to be a good game than an constantly updating game by an big company..
It has nothing to do with valve, people play what they like, but saying that CSP has better changes to improve into good competitive game than 1000 times larger game is just delusional imo...
It is all on valve.People play what they like at an amateur level. Taking about the pro level, people play what valve wants. It is clear that 1.6 is a better game than cs:go, but just think a bit. How much money did valve put in cs:go? They cannot afford losing it all by the risking the game to not be played. It's quite simple in my opinion. And i think i am pretty damn right.
COD is a "1000 times larger game" than CS:GO. Enough said.
What's the point of this thread? The question in the title? The answer is: By having more esport-followers.
But the question is quite confusing since CS:GO is still far away from being a main esport-titel.
Yes atlast i get the answer, after 30 comments. And what has COD to do with this thread its an CS thread in CS forum. "Enough said" what did u say pacifically?`
I didn't reply to you on the topic but told you to use the 'Reply' button to discuss with the previous replies you already got.
Any other way this thread would end up in nonsense. And, believe me, nonsense threads don't last long unlocked.
Yes atlast i get the answer, after 30 comments. And what has COD to do with this thread its an CS thread in CS forum. "Enough said" what did u say pacifically?`
Its also funny how some people say that CS:GO graphics are bad for an 2012 game, but yet the same people say CSP will be popular cause its remade version of 1.6 with better graphics. IMO its exactly like that, the same game with slightly better graphics
Once the CSP dev team makes public the version they consider could compete with CS:GO (even though they state it is not their aim I think it will come down to it sooner or later as it is also something out of the hands) I think you can do this 'comparison', even if it looks more like a CSP bashing than anything else.
Yeah, and something people probably miss here is that i havent said once that csp couldnt be a great game with improvents and so on. But why couldnt cs:go improve too since it has aldready, it seems like users in hltv.org are in charge of what comes popular and what doesnt, ofc they have influence on it, but its small% of people.
If you read the latest statement on the website, you'll read that we are not trying to compete with CSGO as we feel it's a casual game that has just been pushed in to everyone's faces and that "it's an eSports game". Well it's not, it's a console game aimed at those who play bf3 and cod.
Somethings in CSGO are good but others are not. Redstar (a Dev) has tweaked csp_inferno with shadowing and lighting, and it looks nearly as nice as CSGO but without the fog. This will be in 1.09.
So as far as the 10 yr old graphic comments are concerned, we are adding our own custom shaders to make CSP look nicer on the source engine.
i think that all upcoming new and current CS versions won't accomplish anything near like 1.6 did. Next version, that will change 1.6 in eSports gaming, will be titled just 5th & 6th game after sc2, dota2, lol and others.
CS:GO will have most of the prize money if Promod comes into the scene. But in the end CS:GO just came to split the community once again because people aren't forced to adapt neither to play a game they don't like so they will be playing Promod instead. So the history repeats itself once again.
2012-09-06 12:50:54
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.
Fnatic FragOut League Season 2
HLTV Ip's
(4)
Faseeh
pRopaaNS
FACEIT
moxierawr
tweeday
eSportEurope
