Fnatic FragOut League Season 2
HLTV Ip's
-
(11)
(30)
(3)
(46)
(13)
(23)
(135)
(28)
(192)
(123)
(95)
(484)
(8)
(46)
(100)
(5)
(33)
(5)
(233)
(21)
(34)
(48)
(11)
(45)
(183)
-
(46)(46)(12)(52)(166)(9)(19)(10)(17)(28)
-
-
NiPTV-Anders
week
deStrO
pRopaaNS
FACEIT
moxierawr
eSportEurope-
-
-
NiP2 Lemondogs1 Crave Gaming2 internetz0 -
-
-
YaYooo
vENdetta
CS:GO release date announced
Valve has announced a release date for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. The anticipated game is targeted for a release on August 21 at a price point of $15.
Valve made the announcement just in time for E3 which is an annual video game conference short for Electronic Entertainment Expo held in Los Angeles. One of the many companies announcing big news at this year's event is Valve.
The game is expected to be released on August 21, in time for IEM Season VII, with a cost of $15 across all platforms. Intel Extreme Masters has often made their announcements in August, so Valve's release date would allow IEM to use CS:GO already in the upcoming season.
Will IEM VII see CS:GO used in more than just show matches?
CS:GO has split the opinions of fans in half with seemingly most with a Counter-Strike: Source background anxiously waiting for the new game while the Counter-Strike 1.6 fan base hasn't for the most part enjoyed Hidden Path's new game.
While a few top players such as Christopher "GeT_RiGhT" Alesund have said they don't mind the game, the overwhelming majority including the likes of Natus Vincere and ESC Gaming have said they are not interested in Valve's new title and would rather play League of Legends or DotA 2 competitively.
Follow HLTV.org's @lurppis_ on Twitter.
Great news!
2012-06-04 19:34:35
great news? lurppis would be dissapointed in you young fin =D that game is simply trashcan
2012-06-04 20:56:12
i think he ment the part where ESC and NaVi stated they would rather play LoL insted of this game :D
2012-06-04 22:52:29
+1
2012-06-05 16:38:05
Who gives a shit seriously. I have the beta and there is nothing good about the game at all. Its like BF3 or MW or some random shit game made for consoles
2012-06-04 19:34:55
bf3 more fun,kinda more realistic i think.... but gameplay of 1.6 still better and more competitive
Post edited 2012-06-04 19:44:23
Post edited 2012-06-04 19:44:23
2012-06-04 19:44:02
realistic pff who cares, we like to bunnyjump anyway :D
2012-06-04 19:45:18
cs:s before the huge update,thats what i call bhop )) u can get from CT spawn to T spawn in 4-7 secs
2012-06-04 19:46:05
thats not true.
2012-06-04 21:38:56
dust2 in css you could get from t spawn to ct spawn in 4 sec back in 08
2012-06-05 01:48:44
nope, you cant. besides, in competitive scene you dont bhop.
2012-06-05 16:33:47
lol it is... inferno... get speed at spawn,bhop to banana... vuala u are in their spawn in 3-6 secs
2012-06-05 08:43:08
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYEyIGLRqW0
2012-06-06 13:05:32
even after the 1st update you could "if you were really good"
2012-06-06 13:05:13
hes right bf3 is more fun and more intresting after 1.6, no other game can be so competitive than BF3 after 1.6, ofcourse 1.6 is best game, but if wanna get some new graphic and other game than BF3 is realy good, even call of duty MW3 is realy not so good compare to BF3... just my opinion and i played cs 1.6 for 11years and also competitive...
Post edited 2012-06-04 21:07:19
Post edited 2012-06-04 21:07:19
2012-06-04 21:07:09
mw3 is dead.
even promod wont help at all,the maps arent balanced at all....
cod4 and cod2 are the only games that are good to play at pc.
even promod wont help at all,the maps arent balanced at all....
cod4 and cod2 are the only games that are good to play at pc.
2012-06-05 08:44:04
If you want realism, games are not what you're looking for. Go watch a movie or join the fucking army.
2012-06-04 20:03:01
There are army simulators like ArmA 2.
But since you are a 1.6 fan you probably never play anything else.
But since you are a 1.6 fan you probably never play anything else.
2012-06-04 20:17:02
+1
2012-06-04 20:41:20
Army simulators, COME ON! Just understand, its impossible to simulate a GUN FIRE on a computer!!!!
100% sure u never shot with a real gun!
100% sure u never shot with a real gun!
2012-06-04 22:37:59
Ofcourse I never shot with a real gun..
Maybe its normal for Brazilians to shoot real guns, but from my way of seeing things, guns are to be used by people trained to do so, so why should i shoot a gun when im just an 18 years old person who has no training in shooting guns ?
Anyways, by simulator I mean that the game is realistic, wind, distance etc are important factors when shooting, those kinda things make for a simulator.
There are flight simulators like Flight Simulator, and you are not piloting a real plane, still, it makes for a realistic experience.
Post edited 2012-06-04 22:48:45
Maybe its normal for Brazilians to shoot real guns, but from my way of seeing things, guns are to be used by people trained to do so, so why should i shoot a gun when im just an 18 years old person who has no training in shooting guns ?
Anyways, by simulator I mean that the game is realistic, wind, distance etc are important factors when shooting, those kinda things make for a simulator.
There are flight simulators like Flight Simulator, and you are not piloting a real plane, still, it makes for a realistic experience.
Post edited 2012-06-04 22:48:45
2012-06-04 22:45:00
Dont talk about Brazil, u never been here, u dont have a clue about this country.
I took some shots in a gun club, that police controls. Its 100% safe, and its really fun to do it. Any problem with that?
I took some shots in a gun club, that police controls. Its 100% safe, and its really fun to do it. Any problem with that?
2012-06-04 22:57:08
Why are all Brazilians so patriotic ?
I never said I had any problem with Brazil, and since I have never been there thats why I said it may be a normal thing there, its normal in the US for people to fire guns at places specifically designed for it.
So cut me some slack.
I never said I had any problem with Brazil, and since I have never been there thats why I said it may be a normal thing there, its normal in the US for people to fire guns at places specifically designed for it.
So cut me some slack.
2012-06-05 01:06:34
ROFL a mexican guy talking big on being patriotic, mexican community from where i stand are the most nationalist group of people to ever existed in america...
2012-06-05 05:07:25
I can say thats true to some extent, they are really patriotic.
But, im not mexican, Im from Spain and I live in Mexico.
By the way, I visited Costa Rica, it is a beatiful country :).
But, im not mexican, Im from Spain and I live in Mexico.
By the way, I visited Costa Rica, it is a beatiful country :).
2012-06-05 06:07:42
thanks as matter of fact i've always wanted to visit Barcelona but anyways i just hope that CSGO will have a starting community to rely on because i can foretell that game will have a rough start since it will try to replace and grow in an enviroment which is fully operated by 1.6 gamers so i think that in my case i would rather see ppl trying to migrate to CSPromod than CS:GO that at the moment doesn't give me any joy whenever I play it :(
2012-06-06 06:01:23
Why are all Brazilians so patriotic ?
2012-06-05 08:45:50
I have 25 hours in CSGO for 3 monthes and 25 hours in Dota 2 for 4 days.
2012-06-04 19:58:30
good for you
2012-06-04 20:05:08
You have to pride.
2012-06-05 06:17:02
http://cs5145.userapi.com/u102510001/docs/3cf1fd7a..
2012-06-05 13:56:52
also have CS:GO (3days), but i am little bit disappointed, i played some ESL verzus matches but, as 1.6 player , hate that source bullshit TRAIN, INFERNO, NUKE ... so tardet maps ... awhhhh what do I lie to myself :D I love 1.6, i played manny games, COD series, BF , ... but CS 1.6 is my fav game, i enjoy this game since 2003,and i never ever stop play 1.6 whit my friends :D
2012-06-04 20:37:15
you forgot these maps are nothing like they are in source, enjoy staying in the past o/
2012-06-04 23:41:07
What? Inferno in Source=Inferno in CS:GO.
CS:GO is for CSS, what CS:CZ was for 1.6, just few things has been changed but the basics are the same.
CS:GO is for CSS, what CS:CZ was for 1.6, just few things has been changed but the basics are the same.
2012-06-05 10:03:58
i will, better like this shit maps
2012-06-05 11:18:38
It doesn't matter what any of us type on this forum, What you and everyone else have to understand is as soon as tournaments pick this game up (and they will) we will see teams switch almost instantly because that's where the money will be and with valve rumored to be in talks with MLG this could maybe reignite the Counter-Strike community. The sooner people embrace that the easier it'll be for everyone.
2012-06-04 20:46:03
I agree... I know it's no CS 1.6, but sooner or later tournaments will drop CS 1.6 out, and this will come to replace it... I mean, I'd rather have CS GO, than no CS at all, but It's just my opinion. I just think people in here are too closed minded about other games (I used to be like that too with 1.6 being the #1 for me, but I eventually "grew up" and now I share a different opinion).
2012-06-04 20:51:32
why drop something, what have audience ? Jut look on CSS an 1.6 on ESWC http://i56.tinypic.com/mvpvlc.jpg
2012-06-04 21:04:02
Isn't CSS trash? I mean, I can barely see similarities between CS:GO and CS:S besides the engine. And CS:S's competitive edge pretty much died with CGS... I mean, they are good game for diferent people, you can't discuss tastes. I can't think of 1.6 to live much longer.
2012-06-04 21:21:03
That CSS viewership isnt as high as that of 1.6 doesnt mean that CS:GO wont have more viewers than 1.6.
2012-06-04 22:50:30
It doesn't matter about the audience, If leagues pick up the game and they WILL the teams will go where the money is also Alex Garfield once said it's really hard to get new sponsors on board with 1.6 because you cannot goto say Coca-Cola and ask them to invest money in a game that's a decade + old and lets face it looks ugly and outdated. CS:GO will attract NEW sponsors and pump much needed life into the COUNTER-STRIKE scene.
2012-06-05 01:00:19
100% with u!
1.6 its a terminal cancer game.
GO is FPS future competitive game, even if GO at the beggining probably will be terrible to play, if u like FPS competitive u should focus on help it development and the game will get better to play faster.
If u play CS since 1.3 we can understand that GO can be way better then 1.6. Better game, better competitive cene, more money and people involved!
1.6 its a terminal cancer game.
GO is FPS future competitive game, even if GO at the beggining probably will be terrible to play, if u like FPS competitive u should focus on help it development and the game will get better to play faster.
If u play CS since 1.3 we can understand that GO can be way better then 1.6. Better game, better competitive cene, more money and people involved!
2012-06-04 22:45:34
Oh I agree with you when you say it'll be hard to adapt because 1.6ers have been playing the same version for nearly a decade and obviously some people don't like change but lets face it, Time for change in the CS community has come, It doesn't matter if you play 1.6 or Source, CS:GO will unite the communities and hopefully bring Counter-Strike back to what it used to be in 2005/06 with global competition and not just Europe dominating, Admittedly it'll face challenges because e-sports like SC2 and LoL are established now, This is why I think we need both the 1.6 and Source communities to support GO as much as possible because this is all we have now in terms of a PC-FPS title as an e-sport.
2012-06-05 01:03:09
when tournaments do pick up the game i hope the it's a bye to trophy for the one team that did show up.
2012-06-05 04:01:31
You think the current teams are playing the game for the fun of it? Get real, They are playing because that's where the money is for now. As soon as CSGO hits and the money moves there all the pros will switch.
2012-06-05 12:41:58
no, that's not what i think. that's just what should happen if people are truly passionate.
of course there will be teams who frequent the tourneys, i just hope the 1.6 community doesn't give in after talkin' a years worth of shit about how they won't.
money is a sad thing.
of course there will be teams who frequent the tourneys, i just hope the 1.6 community doesn't give in after talkin' a years worth of shit about how they won't.
money is a sad thing.
2012-06-05 22:44:58
I honestly hoep that IEM VII will keep 1.6 :/
2012-06-04 19:35:40
Never gonna be as big as 1.6.
2012-06-04 19:35:47
it can be if the prize money of the tournament will be higher then in cs 1.6 but it wont be alive for 10 years or more like 1.6 is
2012-06-04 20:06:20
Good news and nice and cheap :)
Hope my beta key works till then.
Hope my beta key works till then.
2012-06-04 19:36:31
15$? lol
2012-06-04 19:39:08
GO=Source+ some shits :D source cost 15 bucks .. is good strategy to sell manny copyes, bc if there will be same cost for console players, they will try the game and will buy it, and many idiots will buy this improved source
2012-06-04 20:40:55
you mean the beta thing isn't the final one? there are more to release?
2012-06-04 19:40:08
Meh game, better than source but still horrible
2012-06-04 19:40:28
Cool! I hope Valve does something similar as Riot does to LoL.
2012-06-04 19:41:01
like what ?:D
2012-06-04 19:46:39
They throw tons of money in the game, hosting loads of tournaments. They're streaming and production is also awesome, they're really good at hyping things up - and even delivers. Riot4ever
2012-06-04 20:10:28
Why would they do that? CS:GO isnt a new game, it's just bad remake of CSS. 80% of the people don't like this game,ofcourse they can force CS:GO on tournaments here and there,but as I said before , community doesn't create the game - game creates community.
Post edited 2012-06-05 09:57:56
Post edited 2012-06-05 09:57:56
2012-06-05 09:57:29
Honestly, I won't pay for such a game I mean, i bought 1.6, if they "delete" this game, I will get robbed, it should be free for all 1.6 users because servers will be disabled.....
2012-06-04 19:41:56
? servers aren't going to get shut down with its release, nor will they 'delete' 1.6. you're making stuff up to be dramatic now or simply stupid
2012-06-04 19:43:15
It will never happen, don't worry. It would be a suicide from Valve.
2012-06-04 19:46:24
Valve doesn't run the servers lol. Even if they somehow did shut it down, why should you have GO for free?
2012-06-04 19:46:38
not so boring. do you think its possible that navi and g5 will drop cs and begin plaing lol or dota O.O ?
Post edited 2012-06-04 19:43:38
Post edited 2012-06-04 19:43:38
2012-06-04 19:43:25
If they get this right it's gonna be huge, if not then it's just gonna be another source.
Either way I don't think the 1.6 competitive scene will survive for long after GO is released.
Either way I don't think the 1.6 competitive scene will survive for long after GO is released.
2012-06-04 19:43:39
that's what people said when source came out
2012-06-04 19:45:04
That was 8 years ago, you can't compare it like that.
2012-06-04 19:47:42
When CSS came out, CS was still 4-5 years old, very old for any game to still be played, and people said with its bad netcode and graphics, no new players would ever come and all sponsors would flock to it, letting Source take over quickly. Now here we are, as you say 8 years later, and the same arguments are being made again. I can compare it like that because precisely the same thing arguments claiming it will die are being used again, only 8 years later.
2012-06-04 20:04:59
+1
2012-06-04 20:32:43
No, you don't see my point here.
First of all there's a major difference between a 5 year old game and a 13 year old game.
The quality of rivalling games now are much higher than in 2004.
We see a steady decline in prize money, tournaments are dropping cs 1.6 in favor of more popular games, major organizations like mousesports and EG have shut down their cs divisions.
It won't be long before the pro's no longer can afford living off cs and the professional scene will plummit.
You guys are like religious people, you refuse to accept facts even though all evidence point towards it
First of all there's a major difference between a 5 year old game and a 13 year old game.
The quality of rivalling games now are much higher than in 2004.
We see a steady decline in prize money, tournaments are dropping cs 1.6 in favor of more popular games, major organizations like mousesports and EG have shut down their cs divisions.
It won't be long before the pro's no longer can afford living off cs and the professional scene will plummit.
You guys are like religious people, you refuse to accept facts even though all evidence point towards it
2012-06-05 11:07:43
Every reason you gave was true when Source came out. Did you play cs back when source was released?
2012-06-05 15:48:44
Jesus christ did you even read what i wrote?
I'll make it very simple so you'll understand.
2004.
2004 is a year.
2012.
2012 is another year.
There are 8 years in between.
If something is true in 2004, doesn't mean it's the same in 2012, because things change.
Once again: If something is true in 2004, doesn't mean it's the same in 2012, because things change.
I'll make it very simple so you'll understand.
2004.
2004 is a year.
2012.
2012 is another year.
There are 8 years in between.
If something is true in 2004, doesn't mean it's the same in 2012, because things change.
Once again: If something is true in 2004, doesn't mean it's the same in 2012, because things change.
2012-06-05 16:35:31
Are you gonna be able to play on a mac?
2012-06-04 19:45:40
I'm so happy now.
Because after CS:GO's release, we can expect some news for CS2!
Because after CS:GO's release, we can expect some news for CS2!
2012-06-04 19:45:48
So theres still some people who think that there will be another CS again ? Oh my god.
2012-06-04 19:47:06
Yeah They said that there will be a CS2.
Post edited 2012-06-04 19:48:30
Post edited 2012-06-04 19:48:30
2012-06-04 19:47:57
I can't wait your sources.
2012-06-04 19:52:56
They were saying 'That's not Counter-Strike 2'. Even that's a proof.
"Whereas Counter-Strike 2, at least internally, we think about as something different."
Also a valve employee told that cs2 will be out before hl3.
https://twitter.com/bastianveiser/status/102689773..
"Whereas Counter-Strike 2, at least internally, we think about as something different."
Also a valve employee told that cs2 will be out before hl3.
https://twitter.com/bastianveiser/status/102689773..
2012-06-04 20:04:02
I think it's amusing how people think valve are just gonna ditch GO as soon as it's released and start working on a new CS.
If they make a new CS after GO you guys are still gonna be disappointed with it. If they wanted to make a new CS just like 1.6 but with better graphics they would have done it with GO. They didn't make the game deliberately to piss off the 1.6 community.
If they make a new CS after GO you guys are still gonna be disappointed with it. If they wanted to make a new CS just like 1.6 but with better graphics they would have done it with GO. They didn't make the game deliberately to piss off the 1.6 community.
2012-06-04 19:50:55
cs2 won't be released in at least 5 years, it took valve 9 years to go from cs:source to cs:go. if you think they will release cs2 in 2-3 years, you are extremely wrong.
2012-06-04 19:51:06
How can you be so sure? Are you working with them? Keep your guess' to yourself
Post edited 2012-06-04 20:05:47
Post edited 2012-06-04 20:05:47
2012-06-04 20:01:53
I think anyone with a brain can figure that out. Why the fuck would they waste their time and money creating CS:GO in order to ditch it a year or two down the line in favour of CS:2?
Even if they did do that CS:2 will be as far from 1.6 is CS:GO is.
Even if they did do that CS:2 will be as far from 1.6 is CS:GO is.
2012-06-04 20:12:12
He come from Mars I think
2012-06-04 20:35:06
because they have no reason to make a cs2, they already have cs:go to reek in the profits and if it takes off, they will have no reason to make a new game as long as cs:go brings in money.
furthermore, i have no idea why anyone thinks this magical cs2 would be any more like cs 1.6 than cs:go - they already clearly decided what cs should be like in their minds.
cs2 won't be out in +5 years (probably even more) and it won't most likely be any closer to cs 1.6 than cs:go.
why?
because by then cs:go WILL be the most popular game, and it makes sense to cater to the cs:go players, not to players of a game that was popular +5 years ago and whose players probably aren't around anymore.
sorry to burst your bubble, i still hope 1.6 could stay around somehow but it doesn't seem likely right now.
furthermore, i have no idea why anyone thinks this magical cs2 would be any more like cs 1.6 than cs:go - they already clearly decided what cs should be like in their minds.
cs2 won't be out in +5 years (probably even more) and it won't most likely be any closer to cs 1.6 than cs:go.
why?
because by then cs:go WILL be the most popular game, and it makes sense to cater to the cs:go players, not to players of a game that was popular +5 years ago and whose players probably aren't around anymore.
sorry to burst your bubble, i still hope 1.6 could stay around somehow but it doesn't seem likely right now.
2012-06-04 20:30:26
I know you're probably right, but I hope you're wrong :'(
2012-06-04 23:13:09
They have no reason to make a cs2?
It looks CS1.6's graphics are great for you.
"That's what Counter-Strike is: a game of skill. And this is what CS:GO is: an effort to put anyone who has or should play Counter-Strike into the same game. That's a big enough goal but not a grand enough one to merit the name Counter-Strike 2."
And yes, they clearly decidede what cs should be like.
It looks CS1.6's graphics are great for you.
"That's what Counter-Strike is: a game of skill. And this is what CS:GO is: an effort to put anyone who has or should play Counter-Strike into the same game. That's a big enough goal but not a grand enough one to merit the name Counter-Strike 2."
And yes, they clearly decidede what cs should be like.
2012-06-05 08:07:20
How stupid can you get?
2012-06-05 11:26:15
they won't make a new version of cs ("cs2) as long as the older one (cs:go) is raking in profits, minimum 3 years but i would guess +5.
if you believe everything a company like valve says in media then, well, i have nothing else to say. even with cs:go they went from talking to players and making it a great game everyone likes to promising cs2 would be like what you want.
really?
if you believe everything a company like valve says in media then, well, i have nothing else to say. even with cs:go they went from talking to players and making it a great game everyone likes to promising cs2 would be like what you want.
really?
2012-06-05 15:26:07
so why they made CS:S 10 years ago? There was already CS:CZ.
2012-06-05 17:06:31
2000-11-01: counter-strike 1.0
2004-03-23: counter-strike: condition zero
2004-08-11: counter-strike: source
2012-08-21: counter-strike: global offensive
condition zero was made because of its single player mode for counter-strike (deleted scenes after they changed the studio), it was just to milk out the counter-strike name for more profit. if you have played the game, you will know that it's actually an exact copy of cs 1.6 except nades do not do damage through walls and they have new weapon and player models and sounds.
cs:source is a completely new game which was released right after because it was already planned from years ago - condition zero was someone else's project, not valves, but they greenlighted it because the counter-strike name alone will bring in tons of profit.
after that, as you can see, there was an eight year break even though cs:source was widely considered a flop and most people didn't like it, showing valve just wanted to milk that game for a longer time while trying to improve it.
and once again, like i mentioned before: why would they make a bad game now, then make a cs 1.6 copy 3 years from now to please the players that are no longer around? it's only downhill from here my friend, they're only focused on dota2 now.
2004-03-23: counter-strike: condition zero
2004-08-11: counter-strike: source
2012-08-21: counter-strike: global offensive
condition zero was made because of its single player mode for counter-strike (deleted scenes after they changed the studio), it was just to milk out the counter-strike name for more profit. if you have played the game, you will know that it's actually an exact copy of cs 1.6 except nades do not do damage through walls and they have new weapon and player models and sounds.
cs:source is a completely new game which was released right after because it was already planned from years ago - condition zero was someone else's project, not valves, but they greenlighted it because the counter-strike name alone will bring in tons of profit.
after that, as you can see, there was an eight year break even though cs:source was widely considered a flop and most people didn't like it, showing valve just wanted to milk that game for a longer time while trying to improve it.
and once again, like i mentioned before: why would they make a bad game now, then make a cs 1.6 copy 3 years from now to please the players that are no longer around? it's only downhill from here my friend, they're only focused on dota2 now.
2012-06-05 17:36:45
CS:GO is new game? same engine and modified gameplay but worse than CSS.
It's obvious that Valve didn't work so hard for CS:GO. And it's clear that there will be a CS2.
Also it's like that you're working for Valve. You can't know what things they are focused
It's obvious that Valve didn't work so hard for CS:GO. And it's clear that there will be a CS2.
Also it's like that you're working for Valve. You can't know what things they are focused
2012-06-05 18:54:27
it is an entirely new game, being on the same engine doesn't mean much (cs 1.6 is on a modified quake3 engine, tf2 is on source engine and it's not the same game as css/csgo).
you think valve spending $30-40k on just flying people to their offices and having 10 months of open beta isn't working hard?
you got to be kidding.
there will be a cs2 because it will bring in more money and that is what companies strive for (profit) but it won't be any closer to cs 1.6 than cs:go is, and it won't come out within 5 years.
you think valve spending $30-40k on just flying people to their offices and having 10 months of open beta isn't working hard?
you got to be kidding.
there will be a cs2 because it will bring in more money and that is what companies strive for (profit) but it won't be any closer to cs 1.6 than cs:go is, and it won't come out within 5 years.
2012-06-05 19:53:12
.... and it won't come out within 5 years.
Ok God. i know you know everything.
Ok God. i know you know everything.
2012-06-05 20:14:41
common sense, as i've just explained. money runs corporations
2012-06-05 20:17:34
Ok but a shit game doesn't bring you so many money.
Look DotA 2. 50,601 players are playing it right now. Look CS:GO, at least one hundred beta keys has given but still has 1k player.
Post edited 2012-06-05 21:35:50
Look DotA 2. 50,601 players are playing it right now. Look CS:GO, at least one hundred beta keys has given but still has 1k player.
Post edited 2012-06-05 21:35:50
2012-06-05 21:35:20
you should take a look at comments on sites such as pc gamer regarding cs:go, all those guys are extremely happy about how the game is going.
they will make their money from mass markets, not from esports - everyone will buy the game at $15 = profit.
of course if they were a little smarter they would make it a good game and overtime more people would buy it, but i'm sure their market research indicates that battlefield/call of duty -type games make the most money right now :)
they will make their money from mass markets, not from esports - everyone will buy the game at $15 = profit.
of course if they were a little smarter they would make it a good game and overtime more people would buy it, but i'm sure their market research indicates that battlefield/call of duty -type games make the most money right now :)
2012-06-05 21:44:58
Seems like a premature release.... so much to be fixed.
2012-06-04 19:47:53
Currently it's far from finished. Lets see what they can do in 2 months.
2012-06-04 19:48:43
Cool. Finally I will be able to try it. You can't trust what anybody says about the game, really.
2012-06-04 19:49:19
FINALLY :D
2012-06-04 19:51:20
$15?!?
2012-06-04 19:51:54
awful game hiding its lack of balance with a so called "competitive mode".
2012-06-04 19:53:40
For 15 bucks its worth. But only if you have friends who are interested in playing for fun. Otherway is booring as hell.
Post edited 2012-06-04 19:54:27
Post edited 2012-06-04 19:54:27
2012-06-04 19:54:13
do not count with my 15$
2012-06-04 19:56:25
normal price
but I'm not sure, that I want it!
50/50
but I'm not sure, that I want it!
50/50
2012-06-04 19:56:53
ralf from esc told in an interview that they would change to cs:go and they already talked about that issues.
2012-06-04 19:57:26
Even Source is a better game then this CS:GO.
2012-06-04 19:58:49
Bad thing about source - too easy
Bad thing about cs:go - the game itself
Bad thing about cs:go - the game itself
2012-06-04 20:10:10
Bad thing about source - too easy
ok
ok
2012-06-06 13:16:11
can CSS wallbang? CS:CO can
2012-06-04 20:37:26
i dont care, waste of money 4me
2012-06-04 19:59:43
I would not play that even for free.
2012-06-04 20:00:09
Now that's a lie! xD
2012-06-04 23:03:41
$15 wow that's a good price to be honest
2012-06-04 20:02:45
ESC Gaming have said they are not interested in Valve's new title and would rather play League of Legends or DotA 2 competitively.
wrooooong at least for ESC Gaming players
wrooooong at least for ESC Gaming players
2012-06-04 20:04:45
I'll buy one and use as toilet paper, because shit must be in toilet, isnt it ? :)
2012-06-04 20:06:18
Omg you are so funny and mean please adopt me
2012-06-05 10:48:19
gonna try this one. 15$ is like 2 packs of chigarettes....
2012-06-04 20:06:53
only 15€ but I think the majority will need to upgrade their pc to be able to play it :D
2012-06-04 20:09:36
I would pay $50 for a good update on cs 1.6.
$50 for CS 2? easy.
$50 for CS 2? easy.
2012-06-04 20:10:19
anyone has any info about dota2 release date.I can't fu*king w88888888 :@@@@.Trying to get a freaking key like a hiena
2012-06-04 20:13:30
You would be better off asking in a DotA community and not here...
2012-06-04 20:21:11
ive had my key for months and only played like 2games,it isnt that good.Wait for blizzard's dota.
2012-06-04 21:16:51
i spit on cs:g0
2012-06-04 20:18:02
Guys Guys Guys hold on... Source better graphics GO Better Graphics...When Will they learn that we don't give a thing on this?? we don t need fancy graphics ...We don t need new guns..Give us m4a1;ak47;awp;deagle and 1.6 recoil and we cand play this game on mario platform
2012-06-04 20:23:45
agree!
2012-06-04 20:38:48
Cs go could be a good game but Counter strike is the est of ALL TIME! and i hope it would be in every single tournament! :D
2012-06-04 20:25:12
+1
2012-06-04 20:25:30
I'm sure a lot of retards gonna buy it. Sad :(
2012-06-04 20:27:52
game on
2012-06-04 20:29:30
no wonder why they cant demand 45 bucks
2012-06-04 20:29:52
great imagine NEO AD CARRY PENTAKILL
2012-06-04 20:32:40
cant wait
2012-06-04 20:34:07
Maps are dog shit, guns feel like horse shit
Do not want
Pistols(especially my beloved usp) feels horribleeee
M4 is shit, famas is much better
overall game is shit
Do not want
Pistols(especially my beloved usp) feels horribleeee
M4 is shit, famas is much better
overall game is shit
2012-06-04 20:34:55
No wonder your UPS feels horrible, last time I've heard it got removed from the game, and replace by a similar gun.
2012-06-04 21:07:59
why valve make cs:go(cs:shit)??
when gonna make Halflife 3?? thats its a nice game.
when gonna make Halflife 3?? thats its a nice game.
2012-06-04 20:36:19
you can give me 15$ and I still wouldn't play this ridiculous shit
Post edited 2012-06-04 20:37:06
Post edited 2012-06-04 20:37:06
2012-06-04 20:36:54
Who cares ? It's cs 1.6 site. You also don't write about CS:S.
Post edited 2012-06-04 20:40:55
Post edited 2012-06-04 20:40:55
2012-06-04 20:40:05
so if cs2 was released, you wouldn't want to know?
2012-06-04 21:57:47
well it's not yet a competitive game! if you make a counter-strike you make a game for competitive gaming! they are onto something but they should listen more to professionnal gamers. They also need to make competitive maps, get ride of all useless stuff and obstacles on the map (it is too hard to see enemies and move freely). They need to know the community is not looking for a new BF or else but for a competitive game :)
2012-06-04 20:42:04
GOvno its come!
2012-06-04 20:44:13
this game will never replace ceompetitive counter-strike.
2012-06-04 20:48:21
+1
2012-06-04 20:52:12
If someone has the key to the beta and does not need it, let them appeal to me a private message. I want to see how the game looks and what is physics.
2012-06-04 20:50:28
I recently got this game, and movement+recoiln shit is good. you just have to get used to it.
the things that I dont like on this game is the buying menu, its just messy and annoying. and colt should always be on B 4 3. and _NOTHING_ else. And I also miss the "o" buy-option, for equipment and nade etc.
and I dont like how the maps are, places that you can see through, like under the trains on de_train, the wheels are circles, and this can be so good/OP if you know how to use it. you can just scope right below the train right where the wheel starts. and on de_nuke like that truck on the upper floor, its so easy to hide. and so hard for the "rusher" to spot you, it will be impossible. its too much source rather than 1.6.
and on de_train under the trains, like in 1.6 you could see everywhere from under a train. now, you bearly can see under 1 train.
well yeah, its a good game. but things like this has to be fixed (IMO), to get it competitive.
and also in darker places there is no snowballs chance in hell to see if its a teammate or not:s:
it is like darkgreen-ish T's, and darkblue-ish CT's.
Post edited 2012-06-04 20:51:25
the things that I dont like on this game is the buying menu, its just messy and annoying. and colt should always be on B 4 3. and _NOTHING_ else. And I also miss the "o" buy-option, for equipment and nade etc.
and I dont like how the maps are, places that you can see through, like under the trains on de_train, the wheels are circles, and this can be so good/OP if you know how to use it. you can just scope right below the train right where the wheel starts. and on de_nuke like that truck on the upper floor, its so easy to hide. and so hard for the "rusher" to spot you, it will be impossible. its too much source rather than 1.6.
and on de_train under the trains, like in 1.6 you could see everywhere from under a train. now, you bearly can see under 1 train.
well yeah, its a good game. but things like this has to be fixed (IMO), to get it competitive.
and also in darker places there is no snowballs chance in hell to see if its a teammate or not:s:
it is like darkgreen-ish T's, and darkblue-ish CT's.
Post edited 2012-06-04 20:51:25
2012-06-04 20:50:43
maps are huge shit, include D2 .... buy menu agree whit u, next thing nades are bulshit ...
DECOY awhh.... agrrr :D molotov/i horrible idea, u can buy only one flashbang :O smoke is prety good nade, HE is totally SHIT i had vesthelm on cat in Nuke i eat he nade from enemy and i lost 80+dmg WTF ?
DECOY awhh.... agrrr :D molotov/i horrible idea, u can buy only one flashbang :O smoke is prety good nade, HE is totally SHIT i had vesthelm on cat in Nuke i eat he nade from enemy and i lost 80+dmg WTF ?
2012-06-04 20:57:08
Haven't played the beta but i watched some footage and it looks awful tbh
but still i'm gonna buy,15$ is pretty affordable
Post edited 2012-06-04 20:52:38
but still i'm gonna buy,15$ is pretty affordable
Post edited 2012-06-04 20:52:38
2012-06-04 20:51:34
Valve, this is for you _)_.
2012-06-04 20:53:38
I wish people with beta keys could get the game for free! haha! But I wouldn't expect for the game to come so early, it's good that they're being fast, so tournaments can start thinking about this game (crossed fingers for 1.6, don't want it to be removed ofc).
2012-06-04 20:54:05
CS:GO destroyed CS scene, if you know what I mean with CS.
2012-06-04 20:54:52
dont think so ... in present state is certainly not
2012-06-04 20:59:21
trash game ... better focus 100% on dota 2 if it will be played instead of 1.6
2012-06-04 20:59:10
You are all out of your minds. CS 1.6 is dead. No new tournaments in the future will carry cs 1.6 ever again. After a few years, WCG will drop 1.6. As soon as Intel drops 1.6 as well, what the hell will you kids do? I've played CS since 2000, but you guys have to learn to move on. Surely there will never be another game like cs 1.6, but I'd rather play CS:Go than the next call of duty or battlefield. Embrace the game, it is all that the counter-strike community will have left in a few years time.
The game is not bad. Stop saying the game is shit when you haven't even played it. If you suck at it, it is because you suck at games. I have tons of friends who only play 1.6 and can't get a kill to save their lives in any other first person shooter. Why is it so hard to adapt to a new game? It seems like the whole CS community is full of ignorant morons with no intelligence. It seems that the "pros" are only good because they play cs over and over again and don't actually use their brains. Any FPS game I have ever picked up, I have adapted to it and did not complain. Have fun playing cs 1.6 and holding onto a game that is doing more harm for the community than good. CS 1.6 WILL NEVER ALLOW THE CS FRANCHISE TO GROW PAST ITS PEAK. Remember in 2005 when Jason "coL.1" Lake said that by 2010, cs 1.6 would have its first $1 million player contract? Get_Right, #2 cs player in the world from #1 organization (SK) gets paid less per month than a person who works 30 hours per week at McDonalds! Neo, #1 player in the world, and his teammates have to find a new organization every few months that barley even cover travel expenses. CS 1.6 will never allow professional gamers the experience of of being a true professional gamer. The game is past its prime, only CS:Go can save us. Stop hating and be comfortable with the truth.
My final point is that humans are unable to comprehend sunk costs. A sunk cost is an expense that has been incurred is not refundable. All of the cs 1.6 community has put in so many hours into counter-strike that they do not realize it is a failed investment. Instead of moving on to other games, you guys believe that putting in more time will 1) make you better, 2) make the game better, 3) make the competitive scene better, or 4) make sponsors pay attention to the community. Stop being delusional. Embrace the future or get left behind! Sorry guys, this is just the way life is.
The game is not bad. Stop saying the game is shit when you haven't even played it. If you suck at it, it is because you suck at games. I have tons of friends who only play 1.6 and can't get a kill to save their lives in any other first person shooter. Why is it so hard to adapt to a new game? It seems like the whole CS community is full of ignorant morons with no intelligence. It seems that the "pros" are only good because they play cs over and over again and don't actually use their brains. Any FPS game I have ever picked up, I have adapted to it and did not complain. Have fun playing cs 1.6 and holding onto a game that is doing more harm for the community than good. CS 1.6 WILL NEVER ALLOW THE CS FRANCHISE TO GROW PAST ITS PEAK. Remember in 2005 when Jason "coL.1" Lake said that by 2010, cs 1.6 would have its first $1 million player contract? Get_Right, #2 cs player in the world from #1 organization (SK) gets paid less per month than a person who works 30 hours per week at McDonalds! Neo, #1 player in the world, and his teammates have to find a new organization every few months that barley even cover travel expenses. CS 1.6 will never allow professional gamers the experience of of being a true professional gamer. The game is past its prime, only CS:Go can save us. Stop hating and be comfortable with the truth.
My final point is that humans are unable to comprehend sunk costs. A sunk cost is an expense that has been incurred is not refundable. All of the cs 1.6 community has put in so many hours into counter-strike that they do not realize it is a failed investment. Instead of moving on to other games, you guys believe that putting in more time will 1) make you better, 2) make the game better, 3) make the competitive scene better, or 4) make sponsors pay attention to the community. Stop being delusional. Embrace the future or get left behind! Sorry guys, this is just the way life is.
2012-06-04 21:00:44
lot of text, not single good point.
2012-06-04 21:08:16
It's ok, it is impossible for many to be unbiased and wrap their heads around valid points when they feel that the only thing they are good at is being attacked. If you are really good @ cs 1.6, why don't you write it on your resume and go get a career job? Good luck not being laughed at.
2012-06-04 21:10:20
Only problem is, you never made a single good point. Or rather, everything you said is what the CS:S community has been saying since 2005, and they, too, have been wrong all along.
I've played the game for a bit longer than you, and I still do. Not as much as when I was younger, but that's because I have a job and a rather busy life, so gaming in general has become less of a factor in my everyday life. I've quit CS like 4 times during that time span, but after a bit of time off, it's always felt fresh as ever.
I've also always looked forward to the "new versions", like CS:S and ProMod, and of course CS:GO too. But they just haven't been as good, simply put. I'd be the first one to move on IF someone could come up with an actually good alternative, but it seems people are more interested in catering to the casual market, namely the CoD kiddies. Of course they are, that's where the money is.
1.6 is still fun though, and not because I'm afraid to move on, or because my year old ~1,5k€ gaming PC can't run other games. I play 1.6 for it's own sake, and for no other reason.
I've played the game for a bit longer than you, and I still do. Not as much as when I was younger, but that's because I have a job and a rather busy life, so gaming in general has become less of a factor in my everyday life. I've quit CS like 4 times during that time span, but after a bit of time off, it's always felt fresh as ever.
I've also always looked forward to the "new versions", like CS:S and ProMod, and of course CS:GO too. But they just haven't been as good, simply put. I'd be the first one to move on IF someone could come up with an actually good alternative, but it seems people are more interested in catering to the casual market, namely the CoD kiddies. Of course they are, that's where the money is.
1.6 is still fun though, and not because I'm afraid to move on, or because my year old ~1,5k€ gaming PC can't run other games. I play 1.6 for it's own sake, and for no other reason.
2012-06-05 10:35:40
the thing is 1.6 is a game that requires skill,css/css:go require none or maybe alot less than 1.6.The learning curve is different,1.6 being "hard" is what people love about the game even its randomness,but they (valve) dont understand that.
They ask the pub nubs on theirs forums for ideas,thats why you got stupid shit like molotov (LOL), also the same shit happend when these pub nubs were whining about the awp and valve decided to put a delay on the scope, I remember that day half the people I knew quit the game.
So instead of sticking to what works they change everything?
They ask the pub nubs on theirs forums for ideas,thats why you got stupid shit like molotov (LOL), also the same shit happend when these pub nubs were whining about the awp and valve decided to put a delay on the scope, I remember that day half the people I knew quit the game.
So instead of sticking to what works they change everything?
2012-06-04 21:26:20
tell us this. would you still watch football if the players had to now kick into a circular goal instead of the normal goal or even watch basketball if players are allowed to take 3 steps instead of 2 and if the basketball rim is a square shape instead of a circle? (i'm assuming you watch football and basketball since you are from the states) if no, then you need to stop watching those old style of sports because they've been around for ages and they need to change the whole game play completely since it's hella old. they need to embrace the future of a new kind of football and basketball!!
my point is, why fuck up the physics and game play of cs1.6 when it's perfect already. all valve needs to do is just fix some bugs, improve the net code, and just update the graphics for all the dumb ass kids out there who want something so "realistic" life to satisfy their psycho nature since they never leave their room.
my point is, why fuck up the physics and game play of cs1.6 when it's perfect already. all valve needs to do is just fix some bugs, improve the net code, and just update the graphics for all the dumb ass kids out there who want something so "realistic" life to satisfy their psycho nature since they never leave their room.
2012-06-04 21:33:57
You can't compare real-life sports to gaming at all. In every sport, everyone uses the same equipment. Every league of every sport for the most part follows the same rules and standards. If you want to play soccer, you just go get a soccer ball. If you want to play CS, you have to get a computer and buy the game. When you play sports, you reap benefits because you are exercising and your body feels good. When you first buy counterstrike, there are no immediate benefits. You will immediately get owned by people who are better than you. You don't want to continue to play the game and you will stop playing. CS has different inputs. Everyone uses a different mouse and keyboard, different configurations, and each tournament has different rules. Sports are always evolving as well. New modifications are always being adapted.... The same thing needs to be done with counterstrike. If you truly believe 1.6 is a perfect game, you haven't played enough first-person shooters.
2012-06-04 23:58:07
lol man you clearly don't understand what i'm saying. and you just proved it. i wasn't comparing cs to soccer and basketball. i was stating that, "why change a good game when it's already good?" just admit it man, you don't have a mind of your own and will just follow the big corporations. and yes you can compare a real-life sport to gaming because what makes the sport/game addicting? it's the competitiveness of the game. You make a sport or a video game too easy with no competition, then it's never going to grow. no one plays a real-life sport game alone; even cs.
2012-06-05 01:34:16
http://t.qkme.me/35kd8u.jpg
2012-06-04 21:42:01
Riddle me this.
Why would 1.6 players give a flying f#ck about the success of the CS franchise and/or Valve's financial well being for that matter ?
1.6 players are not brand blind. They are being faithful to a game, to game mechanics, to a style, to the way things feel when they play, and most importantly, to WHAT THEY LIKE ! Why the hell would they move on to something they don't like.
As far as I'm concerned, Valve could be agonizing in the putrid remains of their commercial failures, I wouldn't budge a finger, and I think a lot of people wouldn't either. And it won't happen, because their games appeal to a certain type a people, just not to competitive 1.6 players. Look what happened after the CGS demise, most of the players that made the jump from 1.6 to CSS went back to it or quit playing altogether. Why? Because 1) they liked it better, 2) they understood something that you clearly don't :
THERE WILL NOT BE A SUBSTANTIAL, GLOBAL, PROFESSIONAL GAMING SCENE.
"Professional" gaming is a niche and will be for the foreseeable future.
There are just too many platforms, games, brands, game developers, games publishers, unfair commercial strategies (hello CS clones..), all of them trying to milk gamers worldwide for their money. They are just not enough of us serious gamers for something meaningful to emerge. The good'ol times when PC was king are over, and I don't think cross-platform is gonna change much.
So, for you to think that CS:GO is the next big savior ? That's just ludicrous !
And the only thing we need to do is throw out a game we love and play one that we might not ? COME ON ! Wake up Neo, you're in the real world now !
You want to be a "pro" and willing to do whatever it takes ? Then prepare to jump games as often as you take a dump !
Sorry, not for me. But then again, I don't want to be a pro. So good luck.
And it's funny you should bring J. Lake's "all mighty" prediction back because, well, where is he now ? Apparently not into gaming no more.. :(
Ooh yes! There he is! He is into green techs now, where there is a hell lot more money to make, a lot more faster. That sounds about right. Well, good for him. I would have probably done the same thing (and will actually do it).
And there is something he failed to take into account too when he said this, for good reasons at least : there have been a freaking global financial crisis in the way of big bucks for gamers everywhere.
So, to blame 1.6 players for the lack of money into gaming is a biiiiiit faaaaaaaar feeeetched :)
And finally I'm gonna address your "sunk costs" comment.
You were talking about you didn't you ?
You kinda feel like those 12 years of gaming were just a waste of perfectly good time of epic proportion ? Well, jump on board matey, there's plenty of us in here. We just think that a least it was fun and there is something to be learned from it.
Just don't blame other people for doing what they love when clearly the problem is : we took our BIG DREAMS for granted. There is just as much place for "professional" gaming as there is for "professional" curling. NONE. Whatsoever.
Anyway, I hope CS:GO actually is a good game, because at 15$ (well 15€, Valve sucks at conversions... or not), I appreciate the gesture and I will buy it.
PS: no offense intended of course, you seem like a good guy but you really pissed me off.
Post edited 2012-06-05 01:05:12
Why would 1.6 players give a flying f#ck about the success of the CS franchise and/or Valve's financial well being for that matter ?
1.6 players are not brand blind. They are being faithful to a game, to game mechanics, to a style, to the way things feel when they play, and most importantly, to WHAT THEY LIKE ! Why the hell would they move on to something they don't like.
As far as I'm concerned, Valve could be agonizing in the putrid remains of their commercial failures, I wouldn't budge a finger, and I think a lot of people wouldn't either. And it won't happen, because their games appeal to a certain type a people, just not to competitive 1.6 players. Look what happened after the CGS demise, most of the players that made the jump from 1.6 to CSS went back to it or quit playing altogether. Why? Because 1) they liked it better, 2) they understood something that you clearly don't :
THERE WILL NOT BE A SUBSTANTIAL, GLOBAL, PROFESSIONAL GAMING SCENE.
"Professional" gaming is a niche and will be for the foreseeable future.
There are just too many platforms, games, brands, game developers, games publishers, unfair commercial strategies (hello CS clones..), all of them trying to milk gamers worldwide for their money. They are just not enough of us serious gamers for something meaningful to emerge. The good'ol times when PC was king are over, and I don't think cross-platform is gonna change much.
So, for you to think that CS:GO is the next big savior ? That's just ludicrous !
And the only thing we need to do is throw out a game we love and play one that we might not ? COME ON ! Wake up Neo, you're in the real world now !
You want to be a "pro" and willing to do whatever it takes ? Then prepare to jump games as often as you take a dump !
Sorry, not for me. But then again, I don't want to be a pro. So good luck.
And it's funny you should bring J. Lake's "all mighty" prediction back because, well, where is he now ? Apparently not into gaming no more.. :(
Ooh yes! There he is! He is into green techs now, where there is a hell lot more money to make, a lot more faster. That sounds about right. Well, good for him. I would have probably done the same thing (and will actually do it).
And there is something he failed to take into account too when he said this, for good reasons at least : there have been a freaking global financial crisis in the way of big bucks for gamers everywhere.
So, to blame 1.6 players for the lack of money into gaming is a biiiiiit faaaaaaaar feeeetched :)
And finally I'm gonna address your "sunk costs" comment.
You were talking about you didn't you ?
You kinda feel like those 12 years of gaming were just a waste of perfectly good time of epic proportion ? Well, jump on board matey, there's plenty of us in here. We just think that a least it was fun and there is something to be learned from it.
Just don't blame other people for doing what they love when clearly the problem is : we took our BIG DREAMS for granted. There is just as much place for "professional" gaming as there is for "professional" curling. NONE. Whatsoever.
Anyway, I hope CS:GO actually is a good game, because at 15$ (well 15€, Valve sucks at conversions... or not), I appreciate the gesture and I will buy it.
PS: no offense intended of course, you seem like a good guy but you really pissed me off.
Post edited 2012-06-05 01:05:12
2012-06-05 00:56:37
if this game surpass CS 1.6 i will be dissapointed. :(
2012-06-04 21:04:50
CS GO is more like CSS, CD4 or Battlefield, so its not interesting for 1.6 players
Post edited 2012-06-04 21:11:57
Post edited 2012-06-04 21:11:57
2012-06-04 21:11:28
Agree with this Duke Nukem. For me it's same as CS:S but gun models looks like in Call Of Duty but they also look a lot like each others. For example I can't tell the diffrence between Glock and Usp, same goes to AWP and SGG20 (scout).
And couple of stuff token from Call Of Duty is it has Tazer gun, it's like Call Of Duty knife. It has tons of range and it oneshots to leg.
Also I found myself rushing and spraying only when playing this game. It looks exactly like Call Of Duty (with CS:S maps and shitty Source-engine movement) so I automatically just spray and run same time. Luckily I still did fine and went 10/0 almost every game.
Post edited 2012-06-05 01:51:58
And couple of stuff token from Call Of Duty is it has Tazer gun, it's like Call Of Duty knife. It has tons of range and it oneshots to leg.
Also I found myself rushing and spraying only when playing this game. It looks exactly like Call Of Duty (with CS:S maps and shitty Source-engine movement) so I automatically just spray and run same time. Luckily I still did fine and went 10/0 almost every game.
Post edited 2012-06-05 01:51:58
2012-06-05 01:51:14
Get right interested in CS:GO lol... lets enjoy the final.. CS:GO can never replace 1.6 more then 11k spectators just for some online tourney
Post edited 2012-06-04 21:15:07
Post edited 2012-06-04 21:15:07
2012-06-04 21:12:35
greg, you not see 2305293469 new tournament's of 1.6, why comment when u not even read hltv last 2 weeks... haters gonna hate, but cs;go is ssssssssssahit~
2012-06-04 21:13:54
What new tournaments? K1 League and Fnatic Play? The money offered by these tournaments relative to the amount of time professional teams practice is chicken scratch. The travel expenses to get to china to play K1 league is more than the tournament offers for second or third place. What a joke... Come on now guys, there could be tons of new tournaments in the next year for cs 1.6 but if the prize pools of these tournaments amount to money that is less than CPL was offering 6 years ago, then there isn't progression in the community at all. It is just poor attempts at ripping off gamers, like India Gaming Festival....
2012-06-04 23:48:18
haha you are SO mad lurppis & co, good bye hltv.org
https://twitter.com/FREIHH/status/1851207975878000..
https://twitter.com/FREIHH/status/1851207975878000..
2012-06-04 21:22:59
why would i be mad or why would hltv.org go anywhere in the future? points do not connect.
2012-06-04 22:47:20
What do you think about the game at the moment ?
For how long are you going to cover a game that your readers don't like ?
How do you personnally see the future for hltv.org in the next 4 years ?
For how long are you going to cover a game that your readers don't like ?
How do you personnally see the future for hltv.org in the next 4 years ?
2012-06-04 23:41:09
we will see :). i'm not anywhere near in charge of things like that but i'm not the least bit worried.
hltv.org will continue to be the biggest site out there as it has been for years, i'm sure.
hltv.org will continue to be the biggest site out there as it has been for years, i'm sure.
2012-06-05 00:16:07
Can hltv.org be the biggest site out there without 1.6 being the biggest CS ?
Don't reply that csgo won't be the biggest, it's not the point here.
And you didn't tell me/us what you think about the game at the moment.
Don't reply that csgo won't be the biggest, it's not the point here.
And you didn't tell me/us what you think about the game at the moment.
2012-06-05 00:44:39
if hltv.org chooses to cover cs:go i don't see any reason why it wouldn't be the biggest site for cs:go.
i haven't played the game in a few months but from what i hear it hasn't gotten much better. personally i don't like it, but i don't see a problem in casting it or writing about it if it interests me once it's out - we will see.
i haven't played the game in a few months but from what i hear it hasn't gotten much better. personally i don't like it, but i don't see a problem in casting it or writing about it if it interests me once it's out - we will see.
2012-06-05 00:56:38
"if hltv.org chooses to cover cs:go i don't see any reason why it wouldn't be the biggest site for cs:go."
Because you didn't do anything to be at least constructive about the game, you personnally, but also hltv.org with the readers. For the vast majority, they hate the game, and you(all) have a part of responsability about that : by not understanding what a beta is and imply, by simply giving the feeling that no matter how decent the game could be, you want it dead anyway because you are too narrow-minded and want 1.6 to live forever.
On the other side, you seem so fucking ready to change sides.. At the end of the day you'll simply follow the money but it's too late for you, you are not alone anymore.
Because you didn't do anything to be at least constructive about the game, you personnally, but also hltv.org with the readers. For the vast majority, they hate the game, and you(all) have a part of responsability about that : by not understanding what a beta is and imply, by simply giving the feeling that no matter how decent the game could be, you want it dead anyway because you are too narrow-minded and want 1.6 to live forever.
On the other side, you seem so fucking ready to change sides.. At the end of the day you'll simply follow the money but it's too late for you, you are not alone anymore.
2012-06-05 01:28:20
it doesn't matter what is done before the game becomes big, if hltv.org keeps sending nix0n to events and does the best coverage as usual, people will follow - that's just a fact.
the only people responsible for fans hating cs:go are the developers at hidden path who refuse to make the necessary changes for people with a cs 1.6 background to enjoy the game.
i'd rather have cs:go die and have a superior game (cs 1.6, cs promod) live forever, but i'm also a realist and i know that won't happen (well, cs 1.6 won't, there's still something going on with cs promod that could change things a little).
i think you're overreacting a little bit - i still do, and always will, prefer cs 1.6 over cs:go. if enough top players move on and i enjoy watching cs:go, i will continue to write about it and possibly cast events - simple as that.
the only people responsible for fans hating cs:go are the developers at hidden path who refuse to make the necessary changes for people with a cs 1.6 background to enjoy the game.
i'd rather have cs:go die and have a superior game (cs 1.6, cs promod) live forever, but i'm also a realist and i know that won't happen (well, cs 1.6 won't, there's still something going on with cs promod that could change things a little).
i think you're overreacting a little bit - i still do, and always will, prefer cs 1.6 over cs:go. if enough top players move on and i enjoy watching cs:go, i will continue to write about it and possibly cast events - simple as that.
2012-06-05 03:22:14
"Narrow minded" is different from having certain standards, that CS "sequels" have not been able to reach so far. Not being willing to swallow anything and everything is not being "narrow minded". Wanting the sequel to be better than the original is natural, and so far all CS sequels have been worse.
People who write for hltv.org or otherwise visit this site are not responsible for anything that happens with CS. Whatever people choose to think/write is subjective.
We (using the term loosely) understand what "beta" is. Better than you and Valve at least, since you seem to think that anything goes as long as it's "beta". A car without brakes, engine or chassis would probably be a "beta" for you.
People who write for hltv.org or otherwise visit this site are not responsible for anything that happens with CS. Whatever people choose to think/write is subjective.
We (using the term loosely) understand what "beta" is. Better than you and Valve at least, since you seem to think that anything goes as long as it's "beta". A car without brakes, engine or chassis would probably be a "beta" for you.
2012-06-05 20:37:00
I don't even understand your tweet...
2012-06-04 22:48:36
If even schypher can understand me, you are the one to blame.
2012-06-04 23:44:16
Oh, you're one of those guys who think CS:GO is going to "save" CS/the FPS genre in a competitive setting from its "impending death," right...
2012-06-05 00:26:53
Hmm i just think csgo has an opportunity than neither 1.6 nor css had.
2012-06-05 00:47:53
Who doesn't? It's been 12 years. We'll see in August anyway! :)
2012-06-05 00:52:06
No, we will see in 2014/15, csgo will be a success, tournament-wise, at its launch : even css kind of was (at least more than deserved). Did you learn anything from the past ?
2012-06-05 00:59:40
I see tournament organizers picking it up for one to two seasons (the latter being max) and then dropped. I also see it following in the steps of CSS, and we all know how that will end up... So your "learned anything from the past" can go both ways.
2012-06-05 15:59:41
You do have problem with the English language because it's exactly what i said : we won't learn anything in August as you thought earlier. And starting a sentence by "So" doesn't make it a relevant point, in fact the last sentence is just flying around for no reason.
2012-06-05 16:53:48
I wont buy it
2012-06-04 21:25:36
the real cs fans now can only pray and hope that this game fails evn bfr its released :P
2012-06-04 21:30:55
I just sad with this notice, because my beta key is going down :(
2012-06-04 21:34:52
"the overwhelming majority including the likes of Natus Vincere and ESC Gaming have said they are not interested in Valve's new title and would rather play League of Legends or DotA 2 competitively."
it's an awesome music for my ears *___*
it's an awesome music for my ears *___*
2012-06-04 21:36:22
only for 15€ hu, this is the way of selling that game, same price as 1.6, and some people(noobs) will look and say "hum, same price, but I love csgo graphics :D, fuck 1.6"
Post edited 2012-06-04 21:41:41
Post edited 2012-06-04 21:41:41
2012-06-04 21:39:51
15$? fuck that. i will download this game on the pirate bay
2012-06-04 21:41:51
http://alltheragefaces.com/img/faces/large/neutral..
2012-06-04 21:43:23
you think $15 is much for a game in 2012?
2012-06-04 21:55:53
thats how they will sell this game sucessfully whith people like you thinking 15 bucks is nothing and after 1week they throw it away because they already get it so cheap. look how many games are in the steam store for under 15. theres already a market where free games compete.
Post edited 2012-06-04 22:21:41
Post edited 2012-06-04 22:21:41
2012-06-04 22:18:23
yes it is. i am not rich to spend 15$ on fucking shity video games.
2012-06-04 22:56:30
you know why, he lives in the 3rd world
2012-06-05 09:14:18
omfg its like free game, 15$ is noting, but still this game will never change cs 1.6, cs;go is like a cod, its not counter strike for me... :s
2012-06-04 22:04:02
15$ and nothing are two worlds.
2012-06-04 22:16:26
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31g0YE61PLQ
2012-06-04 22:05:53
"Natus Vincere and ESC Gaming have said they are not interested in Valve's new title and would rather play League of Legends or DotA 2 competitively."
lol, lies
lol, lies
2012-06-04 22:13:57
should have made it free so you can update your Pentium cs1.6 PC's
2012-06-04 22:31:29
I just hope the game is 100% done when this date arrives.
Would be a massive mistake if they fail on that!
Would be a massive mistake if they fail on that!
2012-06-04 22:33:52
I'm not interested in paying $15 in this shitty game, when I already have the best FPS game ever made. CS 1.6 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The rest.
2012-06-04 22:35:46
don't think cs:go will give us same emotions we felt in 1.6 when we were on our best peak
I'm talking about motivation, fun of doing frags and so on
I'm talking about motivation, fun of doing frags and so on
2012-06-04 22:49:10
What I really hate about CS:Go atm is that it takes so fkin much hardware resources. Seriously, 9800gtx+, Intel Core2Duo@ 2x3,6hz, 4gb ram, 800x600 reso, only 4xAA and still just 60-70fps half of the time even though the graphic is not high end at all?! dafuq???? It doesn't even matter if I use 1680x1050 or 800x600, fps are almost the same. lol
Post edited 2012-06-04 23:17:55
Post edited 2012-06-04 23:17:55
2012-06-04 23:16:17
1.6 is the only game which has proved so successful and Smooth running till now.! it has more number of Fans/lovers than the Population of a small country.! 1.6 created a history, 1.6 created so many Legendary PROS.! so 1.6 is the mother of CS.! so how can we Leave our MOther.! :)
2012-06-04 23:27:56
in CS:go no strafe bad hitbox.We not see which anybody kill her opponet when he sit behinde wall,we dont see sick frag this game look like battelfild.In cs 1.6 good randoom and trickes.If you training in 1.6 you become semi-pro/pro.In cs:go all people can play and you aim not enjoi.CS:GO teamplay.So sorry...
2012-06-04 23:33:44
butthurt cs 1.6 fanboys everywhere. If you don't care, why bother opening this thread and commenting? lol..
2012-06-05 00:01:56
this game sucks,hope for 1.6 at iem
2012-06-05 00:09:25
A multiplatform game at a price point of 15$, who could ever take this seriously as a e-sport contender? The game lacks the potential fun factor for players and spectators.
2012-06-05 00:24:14
they've dropped the multiplatform a while ago *nudge* *nudge*
2012-06-05 01:45:00
multiplatform game = a game that can be player on more than 1 platform (like PC + console)
Valve dropped the idea of putting gamers from different platforms playing together against each other in a same server (what they called as "crossplay" if I'm not mistaken)
Valve dropped the idea of putting gamers from different platforms playing together against each other in a same server (what they called as "crossplay" if I'm not mistaken)
2012-06-05 04:32:06
I believe the price is so low because Valve will be integrating an ingame system similar to team fortess 2. Players will be able to use real world currency to buy upgraded gear, hats, camoflauge, and trade them amongst each other. This will bring in a lot of money. Valve made tf2 free to play because they know people will spend money to buy additional items in game. Same deal here.
2012-06-05 02:02:47
Since CS:GO will be released on XBLA we can speculate on its price, the fact of being on XBLA means that it won’t cost as much as a new COD or any other major blockbuster title. The XBLA price range goes from 5$ to 20$, which means it isn’t meant to be a “full new game”. Having leaderboards and matchmaking is one of the requirements for a XBLA title, therefore it isn’t something that it is being done exclusively for the PC version.
2012-06-05 10:56:07
If 1.6 heroes (that we all enjoy to watch, guys who movivates us to play, I'd love to mention Potti as father of cs here) switch to cs:go, then it's going to be succesful no matter what 1.6 ppl wants.
I've found myself watching this for like an hour:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogcBfHjzsIU&fea..
and I'M cs:go hater...
I've found myself watching this for like an hour:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogcBfHjzsIU&fea..
and I'M cs:go hater...
2012-06-05 01:35:37
ITT blind hate
2012-06-05 01:44:31
I've had the the Beta Key three days ago, and all i played was 3minutes. Time enough to see that CS;GO is absolutely SH1T!
2012-06-05 03:40:37
Why does everyone want the game to die so the 1.6 community won't divide? I feel like everyone should at least be optimistic about CS:GO as there is still a possibility of it becoming a good competitive game. With most of your attitude's, you're not giving CS:GO even the slightest amount of interest. At least buy the game when it releases and see how you like the game yourself. In my opinion, the game has been improving slightly. Though it has a long way to go to reach the success that 1.6 had in its prime, at least give the game a chance. It's still in beta, it's not like there's zero hope of it being a good game. Be optimistic. It would be awesome for Valve to create a good game that both 1.6 players and Source players enjoy, no? So at least support it while it's still in the beta stage.
2012-06-05 04:21:02
impossible satisfy cs and csss players lol , that game is aproached to css players , not to our comunity , but i will still try it, the only thing good about it , its that online we can play in good conditions with almost all players in the world
Post edited 2012-06-05 09:54:06
Post edited 2012-06-05 09:54:06
2012-06-05 09:52:52
Woohoo
Now i can fucking play this game ^_^
price is also not high :D i thought it'll be 25-30$ :))
Ty valve :*
Post edited 2012-06-05 05:26:01
Now i can fucking play this game ^_^
price is also not high :D i thought it'll be 25-30$ :))
Ty valve :*
Post edited 2012-06-05 05:26:01
2012-06-05 05:21:17
finally recieved it on steam as a gift...played 3h. and i really can't handle the shooting, especially sprays and shit..but game looks nice after all..i'll buy it
Post edited 2012-06-05 09:43:27
Post edited 2012-06-05 09:43:27
2012-06-05 09:42:36
Who cares really? 90% of our community rather wouldn't play at all,than play this "CS".
2012-06-05 09:51:16
I'd say more like 30%
2012-06-05 10:35:06
IRL I have about 15 real friends who play competitive and neither one of them like it,tbh they said it's complete bullshit.
From the other hand,I have friend who plays competitive dota 5+ years and he says that Dota2 is classic example how new extension of competitive game can be done.90% of all old dota players like new game,which isnt a case with CS:GO and old CS players. Dota2 is currently #1 in steam stats and its still in beta,can you image what will happen when it comes out and it will be free... CS:GO has about 1k players daily,and not all of them will purchase it when it comes out.
Post edited 2012-06-05 10:51:21
From the other hand,I have friend who plays competitive dota 5+ years and he says that Dota2 is classic example how new extension of competitive game can be done.90% of all old dota players like new game,which isnt a case with CS:GO and old CS players. Dota2 is currently #1 in steam stats and its still in beta,can you image what will happen when it comes out and it will be free... CS:GO has about 1k players daily,and not all of them will purchase it when it comes out.
Post edited 2012-06-05 10:51:21
2012-06-05 10:49:10
Hold out for CSP ;)
2012-06-05 09:58:44
Is it even.. you know.. alive?
2012-06-05 10:52:32
Oh yes!
You'll just have to take my word for it that there are great things happening behind the scenes.
You'll just have to take my word for it that there are great things happening behind the scenes.
2012-06-05 10:54:31
excelent the release date has come up! now I know exactly when I will not connect to the internet to see the shit flow..
2012-06-05 10:24:21
stop hate, DONT LIKE - DONT PLAY, is this that hard? i played 1.6 for 12 years and i really like cs:go, its a breath of fresh air imo.
2012-06-05 11:03:02
What are you say, it is not Counter Strike is a completely different game
2012-06-05 12:30:27
Leaving all the debate and arguments aside about CS:GO being a decent game or not, I think the game will fail anyway. Compare it to games in the market with marketing worth a million pounds and look at the few show cases for this game. The majority of people who actually know about this game are 1.6 and Source players who on majority are not bothered about it. Considering, they also aim towards console gamers, clearly their agenda is to be a successful 'new game' and directly compete against the bigger games out there, which can never happen. so no matter what you think good or bad, the is very likely to fail in the market in terms of business and creating a 'name for itself:
2012-06-05 12:35:54
Just hope that cs will still be played in big worldwide tournments
2012-06-05 14:13:57
It's way way waaaay too early unless Valve goes totally mental with updates this summer. Right now the game is nowhere near what it needs to be to be played in tournaments...
After having been slightly positive about it all, this news made me feel quite a bit worried. Once again it seems as if Valve has not idea what has to be done to the game...
After having been slightly positive about it all, this news made me feel quite a bit worried. Once again it seems as if Valve has not idea what has to be done to the game...
2012-06-05 15:42:43
don't like it, period.
2012-06-05 16:24:48
this game should never be at competitive level
its only for fun. I think Valve doesnt gives a shit about competitive gaming, because they only need money from this game. Most ppl here want to buy a key to test it out, i think it would be enough for Valve :D
its only for fun. I think Valve doesnt gives a shit about competitive gaming, because they only need money from this game. Most ppl here want to buy a key to test it out, i think it would be enough for Valve :D
2012-06-05 20:09:54
Funny how 98% of the people posting have probably never played any of this to be justified to commentate wether the game is any good or not. Infact what is the weirdest thing is that people don't realise 1.6 has declined and will be out of the picture - sadly but it's just the way it goes.
At this point CS:GO is the only valid hope the FPS genre as a whole has to stay on the limelight against SC2 or LoL for example. Corporations that makes esports possible look for marketing possibilities and unfortunately an old game does not seem like an interesting investment - which is what putting money into esports end of the day is. Give the game a chance and stop being overly religious about 1.6 - even as it's the greatest and most passionately followed FPS-game to date.
If you wish to see 5on5 fps-action in the future at major events and people being professionals - be constructive in your critisism and opinions.
The game has evolved in huge leaps since the first beta came out last year. At this point I actually find it fun and basic fundamentals are more towards CS than what they were initially. Of course theres plenty of issues to be addressed, meaningless to say - but it's not a lost cause.
At this point CS:GO is the only valid hope the FPS genre as a whole has to stay on the limelight against SC2 or LoL for example. Corporations that makes esports possible look for marketing possibilities and unfortunately an old game does not seem like an interesting investment - which is what putting money into esports end of the day is. Give the game a chance and stop being overly religious about 1.6 - even as it's the greatest and most passionately followed FPS-game to date.
If you wish to see 5on5 fps-action in the future at major events and people being professionals - be constructive in your critisism and opinions.
The game has evolved in huge leaps since the first beta came out last year. At this point I actually find it fun and basic fundamentals are more towards CS than what they were initially. Of course theres plenty of issues to be addressed, meaningless to say - but it's not a lost cause.
2012-06-05 20:27:07
+1
2012-06-05 20:55:53
I totally agree with what you say, and I still believe CS:GO has the opportunity to become something massive. However, I do find it very hard to see how Valve will have enough time to update the game enough to make it appealing to all players from the start. By releasing it too early there is a risk people will try it, dislike it, and then just leave it like that.
Since all game makers seems to be completely oblivious to the fact that a competitive fps-game is a huge gold mine, there is no real reason to rush things. Valve should take their time and not release the game until it is actually what the audience wants.
I don't even get why they have changed the policy they had when they said they wouldn't release the game until it was ready for the masses. Right now it isn't. Surely it's still 2,5 months left until release, but frankly, there is a shitload of stuff to tweak, change and fix. I doubt they have enough time...
Since all game makers seems to be completely oblivious to the fact that a competitive fps-game is a huge gold mine, there is no real reason to rush things. Valve should take their time and not release the game until it is actually what the audience wants.
I don't even get why they have changed the policy they had when they said they wouldn't release the game until it was ready for the masses. Right now it isn't. Surely it's still 2,5 months left until release, but frankly, there is a shitload of stuff to tweak, change and fix. I doubt they have enough time...
2012-06-05 21:37:43
had the beta for months. the company has alot of trust issues, like a lack of paying attention to game mechanic detail, when they say "oh this will merge communities... oh wait bla blah blah we want monies we make game like mw5 and bf15"
in short, game is bad, don't waste 15$, save that money for cs2. (imo, csgo was made to get casual kiddies into the game, make the game popular console side, make some kids playing console think they are 'true' pros, etc. cs2? well, if they [valve] are geniuses, everyone will switch over upon a successful beta of cs2...)
Post edited 2012-06-06 01:23:01
in short, game is bad, don't waste 15$, save that money for cs2. (imo, csgo was made to get casual kiddies into the game, make the game popular console side, make some kids playing console think they are 'true' pros, etc. cs2? well, if they [valve] are geniuses, everyone will switch over upon a successful beta of cs2...)
Post edited 2012-06-06 01:23:01
2012-06-06 01:22:06
csgo=shitgame
2012-06-06 06:09:28
15 dollars ahaha for a recent game? they know this shit is gonna fail so badly. NOW THOSE LAZY FKERS BETTER MAKE CS 2.0!
2012-06-06 12:35:41
CS 1.6 WILL fall eventually... but CS:GO will not be the reason for it. 1.6 is loved for how simple yet so complex it is... it has mechanics of a 2000-ish game, yet offers possibilities for strategies, tactics, etc like no other game on the market. It's unique in it's way, and no other CS could capture that uniqueness yet. What WILL kill 1.6 in my opinion is the fact that new players prefer going to other games than coming to 1.6 (LoL, Dota, CoD, BF, etc), for better graphics, more realism and so forth. I already feel a drop in CS 1.6 population. It's local, on the servers I usually play, some of them losing a ton of players (i.e 2 DM servers that used to be full; now one is completely empty 24/7, the other with 5-10/21 players), but it's quite obvious. The "old school" stops playing and there is not enough "new school" to take their place.
2012-06-07 11:09:18
on my bday :)
2012-06-07 11:57:00
I cant wait... CSGO <3
2012-06-07 14:59:30
they better fix it and make it more like 1.6 or they will screw the whole community... damn you valve!!
2012-06-09 03:08:46
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.
