Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Amd Fx8120 nvidia gtx 970 4gb ddr5 windforce 8gb ram how much?
2016-06-03 20:29
Shitty CPU, 80-120fps
2016-06-03 20:31
lol, u are dumb for sure. without psy, he can get easy 300fps... on fhd...
2016-06-03 20:33
You obviously dont know how important a good CPU is in CS GO
2016-06-03 20:34
#18
 | 
Paraguay HighAIching 
i had 150-250 fps with a worse cpu, nt
2016-06-03 20:41
Tell me what CPU you had and i say if you are right or wrong
2016-06-03 20:42
#24
 | 
Paraguay HighAIching 
i first read it as fx8350, but I had fx6300 so its still not that much different from his cpu
2016-06-03 20:45
rofl my brother have a gtx 960 and cpu is amd athlon x4 750k medium setting without AA and fhd.... he got average 250 fps locked. but stable and locked is 200 fps. cpu is worst than the op....
2016-06-03 21:04
No, that CPU is not worse than OP:s and OP have already confirmed that he only got 120fps, the same number as i estimated....... Stop bitching when you are incompetent
2016-06-03 21:07
rofls, he got a bulldozer, he can easy OC to 4.2 with stock cooler. U are a biggest intel fanboy, if the op only get 120fps, its his problem, he on min settings needs to get 200 fps likely... I had a FX 6100 bulldozer too with hd 6980 on that and i played all the time with 200 fps. 6100 with 4.5ghz OC. SO its his problem. P.S: Im not bitching, im using the real facts ;)
2016-06-03 21:15
You dont really how shitty AMD products between 2011-2015 was, like really shitty, bulldozer is famous for being the shittiest CPU that ever have existed, quick google search and you would see it for yourself, a 2ghz Intel CPU from the Bulldozer era easily beat a 3ghz+ Bulldozer thanks to its incredible shitty IPC Why do you call me Intel fanboy when yourself are so blinded by your AMD fanboism that you refuse to see how shitty those old AMD cpu:s where, EVERYONE know how shitty of an architecture Bulldozer was, even AMD have admitted it....... Fuck off, kid, do some google searching before writing braindead shit Edit: a 2.5ghz Intel CPU would get more FPS than your shitty 4.5ghz overclocked bulldozer shit, these are facts, just google it
2016-06-03 21:21
WE ARE TALKING ABOUT HIS ACTUAL CONFIG, AND CSGO muslin... You still comparing with the other games... Im not a fanboy, i have intel 5820k with 32gb gskill ddr4 and crossfire of 290x... I got 144hz monitor and 27 pol Dell for work. Im just trying to help the OP he should get more FPS without spend money ;) And ur arguments its no based, search google blabla, i now how shit that cpu is, but we are talking about CSGO not everything. So enjoy ur stupidity, and still ignorant rofl.
2016-06-03 21:28
youtube.com/watch?v=uFwZXhWwUrA Enjoy, this guy gets 60-120 fps with all setting on high, AA etc... rofl. He should on med settings get at least 200 fps... And with a 7770: youtube.com/watch?v=HhfrdJuIREg
2016-06-03 21:19
Are you stupid or something? Both those Youtube links confirms that i am right, wtf is wrong with you? And read the comments, especially for the first Youtube link and you will see that everyone else is also saying how shitty that CPU architecture was......
2016-06-03 21:23
If you plan on buying this, dont get a better CPU ( intel)
2016-06-03 20:32
I have this cpu, and someone just offered me that graphic card..
2016-06-03 20:33
Oh it should be above 150 fps but depends on your settings
2016-06-03 20:34
1024 all low I get like 120 fps
2016-06-03 20:38
With the 970 or a different gpu? GPU makes a difference ( not as much as a cpu) but still a small difference
2016-06-03 20:38
See how good my estimate was, i estimated the FPS long before you told your FPS, you should trust me Buy a new CPU, your CPU have the worst IPC in the history of CPU:s, a 2ghz intel CPU from the same year beat a 3ghz AMD cpu
2016-06-03 20:40
i think stable 10fps
2016-06-03 20:33
i've got fx-8350 and a gtx 950, all settings low, 1920x1080 resolution and i get about 300 fps
2016-06-03 20:35
Im not close to that..
2016-06-03 20:38
well still aint big difference
2016-06-03 20:46
#9
 | 
United States julian_stout 
14-26 fps, with freezing if grenades go off or i shoot to much :D
2016-06-03 20:37
#10
 | 
Russia RacerJuiced_ 
1488 on minimum 1337 on max
2016-06-03 20:37
0~999
2016-06-03 20:39
Serious answer here: Your GPU is a bit better than mine and your CPU is a bit worse. CS:GO looks at your CPU (mostly) so I'd say about 250fps on everything low (similar to what I have). EDIT: This is on 1920x1080.
2016-06-03 20:40
nah bro, I don't have that, I got like 120 fps
2016-06-03 20:41
Do you have Multicore Rendering on? I had the same problem, you need to have that on with your CPU.
2016-06-03 20:42
I do bro.
2016-06-03 20:45
Well, I don't know what else then :/ It's 99% your CPU, and your CPU isn't that good, sadly. Your GPU is, but that doesn't matter a lot. I mean, your CPU is decent, but apparently only good enough for ~120fps.
2016-06-03 20:46
#17
 | 
Hungary adzeii 
200 plus
2016-06-03 20:41
#22
 | 
United States Pwelch 
150+
2016-06-03 20:44
CPU is crap, wait for Zen or buy any Core i5
2016-06-03 21:08
why this CPU? use Intel. AMD > nVIDIA (GPU) AMD < INTEL (CPU)
2016-06-03 21:19
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.