Thread has been deleted
Last comment
1.6 > csgo
Twistzz | 
Germany DrPhill 
fucking csgo is cancer. 1.6 is so much more fun to play and im not a crying old veteran. but i know the community back in the days was better not complete cancer idiots like today. and overall everything about the game is better than Cancer Strike: Global Cancer. i want 1.6 back so bad but all bout valve cares is money with skin horny idiots. and the fix with hitboxes THIS YEAR tells everything how bad this game is. csgo ruined everything.
2016-11-27 13:33
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
yes /close /open bye /close
2016-11-27 13:34
/open confirmed by tvbanan and whalescantfly /close
2016-11-28 09:14
/reopen I can confirm confirmation¨ /close
2016-11-28 14:52
/reopen Hi mom /close
2016-11-28 23:27
/open The fuck is reopen ? /close /cl_draw_only_good_answers 1
2016-11-30 19:38
/reopen nt baguette /close
2016-11-30 19:39
#274
Stewie2K | 
Netherlands TMR! 
/open japn no yes /nomoreclose
2016-12-05 11:33
/reopen #GONINJAS /antireopen /close
2016-12-05 17:52
#2
 | 
Hungary Shaperz 
+1
2016-11-27 13:34
1.6 can come back if people used irc.
2016-11-27 13:34
#21
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
Discord is the new IRC
2016-11-27 13:56
Not really.
2016-11-27 16:15
#80
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
Basically everyone I know who used IRC constantly are using Discord now. There's even a very popular plugin that imports and exports text between IRC and Discord.
2016-11-27 16:17
Yea but do they use it for cs nooooooo.its basically 1 big twitch chat filled with trolls.
2016-11-27 16:19
#88
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
Well I don't think so, but I'm sure there are mixchannels for CS:GO. But it's used in almost exactly the same way as IRC was used for 1.6.. considering team-channels and mixchannels. It's just a mix of IRC and Ventrilo.. kind of.
2016-11-27 16:21
#272
NEO | 
Denmark Bqlle 
? Tell me the channels on discord that have replaced the #pcw, #5on5, #pracc etc. on irc pls :)
2016-12-05 11:28
#275
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
There's several big Danish discord channels that work in just about the same way, not sure about international ones as I haven't been interested.
2016-12-05 11:41
#291
NEO | 
Denmark Bqlle 
I shall repeat my question, as you didn't answer - Tell me the channels on discord that have replaced the #pcw, #5on5, #pracc etc. on irc pls :) The names, if you please.
2016-12-05 13:18
#292
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
There's no channel with those exact functions that I know of- Danish ones anyway. There might be international ones. Pick your poison of the major Danish channels, and find praccs.. both against mix and teams.
2016-12-05 13:29
#295
NEO | 
Denmark Bqlle 
Then apparently it doesnt work at all like irc :D
2016-12-05 13:58
#296
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
Well no it's not a direct copy of course, but the basic features are very similar- and it's got a decent voice service. Those channels were made by the community, and if there was a big enough demand from the community- it could be remade in Discord. I'd still prefer IRC and Ventrilo (though I like Mumble better, and it's much cheaper to host) for nostalgic values though.
2016-12-05 14:07
Go play 1.6 then no one cares
2016-11-27 13:35
#5
 | 
Russia band1 
1.6 is shit
2016-11-27 13:35
#6
Twistzz | 
Germany DrPhill 
nt newage pleb
2016-11-27 13:36
#19
 | 
Russia band1 
1.6 is shit
2016-11-27 13:54
#16
LeX | 
Russia mddn 
go to school kid
2016-11-27 13:54
#20
 | 
Russia band1 
1.6 is shit
2016-11-27 13:55
your dead nan is shit
2016-11-28 04:16
#7
 | 
United States 420Pizza 
1.6 and source are better. GO is still fun tho
2016-11-27 13:37
agreed
2016-11-27 13:37
CS:S > CS:GO > CS 1.6
2016-11-27 13:37
1.6 > cs:s > csgo
2016-11-27 13:39
Wtf css better then csgo? Noooooooo
2016-11-27 13:53
1.6>csgo>css
2016-11-28 09:13
+1
2016-11-28 09:47
+1
2016-11-28 16:23
+1
2016-12-05 12:25
#17
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
+1
2016-11-27 13:54
css was the worst fucking game with kids who thought gfx > game play.
2016-11-28 04:16
#145
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
Agree, and there was a huge amount of the playerbase playing "fun gamemodes" like zombiemode and whatnot- rather than basic bomb/defuse compared to 1.6. But it was fun to play competitively once in awhile.
2016-11-28 04:18
how could you play css when 1.6 had pool day and mansion. kys css players you probably started playing the game cause you were shit at cod
2016-11-28 04:21
#151
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
I have 5k hours in 1.6 and 200 hours in CS:S. It was just something to play for fun, as I had several friends who played it competitively. 1.6 was my main game that I would play seriously while I would play DotA, WoW and CS:S for fun. The "1.6 vs CS:S" mentality was always retarded. But I agree that it definitely appealed to kids with it's graphics, and had a much lower skill-ceiling overall (at least in the Danish scene).
2016-11-28 04:29
#23
 | 
Hungary SancheZjr 
+
2016-11-27 13:57
#136
 | 
Brazil arunino 
cs:s is pure shit. only players who were noobs in 1.6 switched to cs:s and became pro cs:s, while they suck in 1.6.
2016-11-28 04:09
Snax > TaZ, Pasha, Neo
2016-12-05 13:03
kys
2016-11-28 05:43
Who the fuck cares about your hates. If you have a problem you need close your mouth and go play cs 1.6. Go play cs 1.6 on graphic from 1900,but you didn't need to cry on hltv forums.
2016-11-27 13:40
nice grammar I rate 4/5
2016-11-27 13:54
nt finlandistan
2016-11-27 14:01
finlandistan nt polando
2016-11-28 07:11
#177
 | 
Denmark niko8809 
Nt.... nvm i don't know what country that is
2016-11-28 07:40
fuck finland that grammar was 3/5
2016-11-28 04:21
You probably tried the CS series the last month for the first time, didn't you?
2016-11-27 16:24
You probably tried the CS series the last month for the first time, didn't you?
2016-11-27 19:49
Youre one of those retards that thinks graphics is the only aspect of a game
2016-12-05 14:13
Everyone knows 1.6 is better...
2016-11-27 13:44
Nope lol, 1.6 is shit compared to csgo
2016-11-27 16:18
kek
2016-11-27 16:19
1.6 has no competitive mode so.. cs:go > all. Maybe FACEIT CS 1.6 I would play definitely
2016-11-27 13:51
#25
NEO | 
Poland foonatic 
FACEIT CS 1.6 <3
2016-11-27 14:01
Does Face it support 1.6?
2016-11-27 14:10
esea would be better. cuz faceit is full of cheaters
2016-11-27 14:43
#29
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
Huh? There were many services similar to Faceit for 1.6. ESEA, ESL and PlayZeek were among those I actively used. Matchmaking is absolutely horrible, so I wouldn't really count that as a pro.
2016-11-27 14:08
Were? You can still play CS 1.6 competitively on esea
2016-11-28 04:05
#135
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
Yes you can, but I don't personally do it. Hence "were".
2016-11-28 04:07
Playzeek best 5v5 tournaments final match the client goes bananas and the whole tournament was fucked
2016-11-28 09:52
#273
NEO | 
Denmark Bqlle 
playzeek haha fuck off mate. You'd have to be a fucking grims to be black. Shitty platform for newbies
2016-12-05 11:30
CS CZ > CS ONLINE > CSS > CS GO > CS 1.6
2016-11-27 13:53
noty. and gtfo then. yes csgo sucks and valve are a disgusting company made of the last scumlords but still i wouldnt want 1.6 back.
2016-11-27 14:00
U were probably garbage at it..and i bet u favor csgo because u can be random fuck and get away with it.
2016-11-27 16:16
stfu. the thing is, i dont wanna be playing minecraft in 2016. minecraft wont fill stadiums. it wont be on TV. it wont make it so that people can make a lot of money from it and that theres events almost every weekend. and also all u nostalgic cunts seem to have forgotten completely that 1.6 had its own flaws.
2016-11-27 16:19
yyea people want to back cybersport in 1.6 1.6 is better of course csgo is a shit game which gaben make
2016-11-27 14:04
#28
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
I will never rate CS:GO above any other version of CS as long as you can predictably run (and even jump) and shoot precise. For me, the game is ruined by OP pistols and run-and-gun SMG's.. and too precise in-air accuracy with scout. There's also a distinctive lack of tuscan, which was my favorite map in 1.6. The CS:GO versions of nuke and inferno are also both horrible (although the new inferno is pretty sweet). I don't actively play the game for those exact reasons, but I still follow the pro scene.
2016-11-27 14:06
+10000000000000000000000000000000
2016-11-27 14:11
if you rate cs:s above csgo then you're totally clueless
2016-11-27 14:14
#36
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
I didn't play CS:S that much at all, but the time I did was not bad at all. I don't nearly rate it as high as 1.6, but I can understand why people liked it.. definitely. CS:S didn't have those issues I mentioned above, which completely ruins the game for me.
2016-11-27 14:17
cs:s was not bad, but csgo, especially in its current state is better on every aspect. technically and balance wise. cs:s had a lot more issues of its own.
2016-11-27 14:18
#41
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
Well I guess that's subjective. In my own opinion, those issues I described are way worse than the issues CS:S had. They didn't make me completely stop playing the game competitively as CS:GO did.
2016-11-27 14:24
im talking about cs:s, you just said you barely played it.
2016-11-27 14:28
#46
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
I barely played it compared to 1.6. I played it competitively once in awhile, since one of my best friends played it on a quite high level and would use me as a standin.
2016-11-27 14:29
youtu.be/Cf2qmwtWOM0?t=227 this is what dazed has to say about cs:s compared to csgo. basically, pro cs:s was all about exploiting bad mechanics.
2016-11-27 14:31
#48
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
So was 1.6.
2016-11-27 14:32
indeed, which was a bad aspect of the game. i play cs since 1.0, i've never liked all the movement exploits. that has nothing to do with skill.
2016-11-27 14:33
#51
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
I disagree. :)
2016-11-27 14:33
i'm with dazed here. :)
2016-11-27 14:34
#54
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
He also says the ADADAD problem was skill-based. Top fucking kek.
2016-11-27 14:35
he makes a lot of good points there.
2016-11-27 14:37
+99
2016-11-27 14:34
+10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2016-11-27 14:50
good things eventually end. you just gotta face it thats all.
2016-11-27 14:09
NO
2016-11-27 14:12
go play 1.6 then, jeez. don't be a drama-queen about it.
2016-11-27 14:13
+1
2016-11-28 14:49
#38
 | 
France ArthuRaaW 
LOL
2016-11-27 14:19
I miss ClanBase
2016-11-27 14:20
i hate flashes in cs 1.6 you are like flashed 7 sec
2016-11-27 14:23
#56
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
But at least you won't be flashed at all if you look away. Skill-based.
2016-11-27 14:39
i am still half flashed and i can't see anything for 4 sec
2016-11-27 14:40
#58
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
Not if you look away, or down in the ground :) you're describing how it is in CS:GO. In 1.6 you would never get flashed if it pops around a corner, for some reason you do in CS:GO.
2016-11-27 14:41
you didn't played cs 1.6 at all i see
2016-11-27 14:42
#61
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
Nah not really man. Only 13 years
2016-11-27 14:42
nt liar
2016-11-27 14:43
#64
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
If you think so. I honestly couldn't care less what some random CIS guy thinks
2016-11-27 14:44
tell me more
2016-11-27 14:46
No, you are just clueless.
2016-11-27 16:29
??? you could see fine if you actually dodged flashes. Was your brightness maxed out or someshit
2016-11-28 03:19
his screen was permanently white i guess
2016-11-28 03:55
yes i am that stupid and play with brightness 100% for 8 years
2016-11-28 06:50
go sleep s1mple decoy face
2016-11-28 16:25
can't say anything else cuz low iq ?
2016-11-28 16:31
stoped reading at fAla19
2016-11-28 14:50
new hitboxes are older than 1 year xD
2016-11-27 14:25
oops xD i know what you mean xD xD
2016-11-27 14:26
oops xD i know what you mean xD xD
2016-11-28 04:03
oops xD
2016-11-28 11:21
#43
f0rest | 
Russia 1.6 FTW 
1.6 is dead, deal with it my frend
2016-11-27 14:25
+1
2016-11-27 14:33
#60
NEO | 
Macedonia balich 
we all love 1.6 more than csgo :/ (except source players :D) cs 1.6 reminds me of my childhood :D
2016-11-27 14:42
I miss 1.6 too mate. But we can't do nothing to bring it back :(
2016-11-27 14:45
It's funny how everyone is trying to say 1.6 was better yet all the people saying that are hypocritically playing CS:GO. If 1.6 was really that liked (people just say they like it to stick with the crowd) then the game would actually still be played.
2016-11-28 10:40
#280
dv | 
United Kingdom dv-_- 
The game is still played by quite a few people, there just isn't any competitive side which makes it a bit boring to play - especially knowing the fact that it's swiftly dying due to getting no new players. I think the main reason so many people complain about GO is that they want Valve to listen and implement more changes that reflect playstyle in 1.6, and saying GO sucks 1.6 better seems like the easiest way to do that, however Valve are pretty retarded and don't really listen to the CS community (Which is odd because they listen very closely to the DotA2 community, and pretty much all updates are well received by the community)
2016-12-05 12:18
skins and lowered skill ceiling is what made csgo successful
2016-11-27 14:45
noob youtubers getting rich
2016-11-27 14:50
+1, I bet Silver - MGE only players watch the low skilled Youtubers who have aim so bad and no game sense at all such as:HOUNGOUNGAGNE, Skitzmachine, Sparkles (I don't talk about the compilations) and so on. It's so sad that only few people know about NatoSaphix, for example.
2016-11-27 16:32
You are totally right! Those lames don't understand how hard cs can be..
2016-11-27 19:51
pretty much this
2016-11-27 19:56
its kinda rightwhat ur saying. cs community this days is absolutly shit... just kids who think they are someone just because they hit global or supreme and think that can talk shit to everyone... just a bunch of racist and disrespectable teens... but GO can actually be the perfect cs, but instead valve just wants to fix thinks that doesnt need to be fixed... Miss 1.6 too tho
2016-11-27 14:51
Csgo was made so any shitty can pick up the game and be good at it..id u pay attention many esports are like that today.its all about making it easier for casuals.for example look how shitty cod is..and very year they come out with more games and scrubs buy it everytime.
2016-11-27 16:21
#71
 | 
Germany Xantennn 
1.6 >>>>> CSGO >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source Shit Still 1.6 is sadly dead :( So no other option then to play CSGO
2016-11-27 14:52
#144
 | 
Brazil arunino 
+1
2016-11-28 04:18
THERE IS NOTHING TO COMPARE, CS GO IS SHIT REAL COUNTER STRIKE IS ONE AND ONLY 1.6
2016-11-27 14:53
Cs go = no skill Cs 1.6 = skill Cs go for kids and Gaben money
2016-11-27 14:57
#74
 | 
Turkey naberpanpa 
Bring back to 1.6 match making system... When it done the game will be superB again...
2016-11-27 15:02
Someone needs to make a mm system for 1.6
2016-11-27 16:17
Or you can play on 3rd party services.
2016-11-27 16:34
esea is the only one that has 1.6 servers...and nobody even knows about it
2016-11-27 19:35
I do.
2016-11-27 19:36
yea but not 80% of the people who play cs 1.6 on pub servers.
2016-11-27 19:40
They are either 10-13 year olds or 20-30.
2016-11-27 19:42
doesn't matter what age it is..they are not playing the game competitive.
2016-11-27 19:44
+1
2016-11-27 15:03
ofc 1.6 > csgo. anyday to be honest.
2016-11-27 15:05
#86
 | 
Sweden alizi 
cs 1.6 max hz is 60 i think, my monitor is 144 - cancer gameplay but i would like to play cs 1.6 again
2016-11-27 16:20
Lol, no.
2016-11-27 16:34
#129
 | 
Brazil arunino 
just learn how to set 144 hz...
2016-11-28 04:04
#298
 | 
Sweden alizi 
im global
2016-12-05 14:48
#281
dv | 
United Kingdom dv-_- 
Launch options: -freq 144
2016-12-05 12:19
CS:GO higher skill ceiling = more competitive end of story csgo>1.6 edit: CS:GO also more tactical.
2016-11-27 16:21
#98
 | 
Sweden X-rAy 
CS:GO higher skill ceiling = more competitive u obviously dont know what ur talking about. cs go blocks u in so many ways... movement..hitting awp shots is so easy cause ur slower, thats why they fucked awp movement, cause dummies are so slow even an old hag can hit shots with awp. skill is so lower, but in terms of utility u need more practice/knowledge, but thats not skill, thats just remembering the spots.
2016-11-27 16:55
I trush Heatons interview more than some swedish pleb on hltv nice try Abu.
2016-11-27 20:20
+1, totally agree
2016-11-28 03:28
+1 the dunnock guy is an idiot
2016-11-28 05:47
#159
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
CS:GO only has a higher skill ceiling because of the times. More kids have computers, eSport has grown- thereby more sponsors and professional teams who invest more time into having it as a full-time job. This was very apparent by the release of CS:S which gained a lot of attention, although it was an inferior game to 1.6. When CS started out, eSport was barely a thing- with Quake being the top title.
2016-11-28 04:57
#282
dv | 
United Kingdom dv-_- 
CS:GO 100% does not have a higher skill ceiling than 1.6. It's like saying Tetris has a higher skill ceiling than Chess, it's just mind-bogglingly stupid.
2016-12-05 12:24
the community was always cancer
2016-11-27 16:24
#94
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
Nope.
2016-11-27 16:32
+2
2016-11-28 04:04
#97
f0rest | 
Serbia dankooo 
I watched yesterday some of my games that i played long ago and some frags i have forgoten about and damn its so much better
2016-11-27 16:36
CSGO=FPS CS 1.6=AIM pick one
2016-11-27 16:58
+1
2016-11-27 16:59
Kappa
2016-11-27 17:05
1.6 was better than csgo, but the old valve update that put a fukin slow motion when duckjump or jump ruined gameplay. So for now csgo > 1.6
2016-11-27 19:46
So for you, the jump is all that matters? ok..
2016-11-27 19:53
old update that fucked up all the rates and recoil.. thats what ruined 1.6... but its still a better game spray is totally fucked in 1.6.. atleast compared to what it was b4 the update
2016-11-28 03:54
I totally agree with you! Yesterday i tried CS1.6 and that ugly bad recoil and bad registry. The game is so fucked up after 2013 update, valve did it on porpouse so players can move to CSGO.. :/ CSGO > CS1.6 Why? Like i said, for you crybabies that think CS1.6 is better, just go install it now and see how recoil is fucked up, you can't even spray on some computers. 50% people have that wierd recoil bug and 25% don't even notice or 25% don't have it. Here's the proof, if you shoot slow one tap or fast with deagle, bullets should go directly right and fast. *not just deagle but all weapons. Look for it on this video, bad bullets example -> vimeo.com/13240135 As you can see the recoil is like in western movies. (If someone don't believe this actually exist, just search for it on google: CS1.6 Recoil problem)
2016-12-03 02:51
Spent like 3 hours in a HS FFA server on 1.6 the other night, enjoyed every minute of it, nobody spinbotting on accounts with 1 hour played, no ruski's arguing about eachothers mum in voice chat, no fucking cancer cunts playing shitty trigger inducing pop music through their $1 distorted razer xbox headset microphone! Not only that but aiming is so much nicer in 1.6, everything just feels smoother and more refined, csgo feels heavy and not very smooth even on my pc that makes 300fps solid on medium settings! 1.6 > CSGO if you could still pug on 1.6
2016-11-27 19:47
#111
 | 
Brazil mibrzera 
br scene 1 major in cs 1.6 br scene 2 major in cs go cs go > cs 1.6
2016-11-27 19:52
#115
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
br scene 0 major in cs 1.6* I know you're a trolling fakeflagger, but I had to fix that one.
2016-11-28 02:05
#116
 | 
Brazil mibrzera 
nt retard, cogu rekt fnatic ass in ESWC
2016-11-28 02:52
#117
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
Counting ESWC 2006 as a major is already rather silly.. but take a look at their road to the final. i.imgur.com/6tJneRY.png Drawing with the only other professional team in the group.. Lunatic-hai who were nothing special at that point in time, yet. i.imgur.com/4hTU2AF.png Facing x6tence and attax in the finals (barely winning over attax, undeserved in my opinion) and won the final (which was a fucking bo1 LOL). Teams they avoided who they never won a deciding match against: NiP Pentagram Virtus.pro coL It was just a fluke event, where some of the best teams didn't attend, and mibr got an easy way to the final, and won it as it was a bo1. A few months later, the biggest event which I would consider a major (WCG) took place, where mibr dropped straight out of the group stage with an embarassing loss to EXECUTIONERS who ended in 2nd place of the group. The only time mibr ever impressed me was at shgOpen in 2007.
2016-11-28 03:17
Actual Virtus.pro, actual NiP, acutal coL, actual aTTax. I wish I had discovered cs scene earlier than 2008 :(
2016-11-28 09:16
#186
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
At least you discovered CS 1.6 at its absolute peak :) I wouldn't say that's a bad thing
2016-11-28 09:33
nah, imo the peak was in the 2006
2016-11-28 10:36
#196
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
2008 according to the number of events, and prize pools :)
2016-11-28 10:44
ESWC was a major back then, doesnt matter how shitty it is now, back then was one of the best events of the year
2016-11-29 18:49
nades in cs go r better and more weapon diversity but pistols and m4 not 1 shot hs close range r retarded
2016-11-28 03:17
#284
dv | 
United Kingdom dv-_- 
I absolutely hate the nades in GO, they are one of the worst things about the game.
2016-12-05 12:26
how so?
2016-12-05 19:22
#304
dv | 
United Kingdom dv-_- 
Well the way the interact with surfaces can be a bit random. Also the fact that flashes can flash people who are fully turned, even around a corner, is just retarded. Flashes in 1.6 were strong if the enemy looks at them but practically useless if the enemy dodges/looks away, which meant you have to throw them pixel perfect to try catch people out
2016-12-06 08:56
There's lots of reasons why 1.6 was better, but the biggest thing is that CSGO has stupid fuckin pistols.
2016-11-28 03:22
yeah csgo too op pistols + shitty movement
2016-11-28 05:45
#122
 | 
Argentina juanme555RIP 
1.6 > GO but... 1.3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6
2016-11-28 03:50
#139
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
Using the AWP in CS 1.3 was like sex I really didn't miss all those graphical glitches it had though, compared to 1.5 and 1.6.
2016-11-28 04:13
#152
 | 
Argentina juanme555RIP 
Spraying with AK in 1.3 was the best. tho i dont agree with jump shooting in pistols, it at least had the proper idea wrongfully executed, it had literally no spread/inaccuracy, as in, it didn't have RANDOM recoil in any main gun, when the bullets went away from the crosshair it was the same distance and position on every single magazine, which is 100% correct. the perfect mix between both cs and quake strong hardcore points.
2016-11-28 04:42
#153
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
Well I completely agree, what I meant with graphical glitches were just the visual bugs which made it quite annoying to predict movements- and just generally annoying for the eyes. Models and weapons flickering, dead bodies moving, problems with lights. youtube.com/watch?v=xQquwE-SdfE I really fucking loved the AWP, and AK and the headshot animations.. and I really miss the MP5 from the 1.3 and 1.5 days.
2016-11-28 04:46
#154
 | 
Argentina juanme555RIP 
yeah i know, it was kinda annoying when the drawing animation auto-skipped itself, however in 1.6 im pretty sure most players used commands to cancel draw animations, i never used them because they were banned from lans so i thought it wouldn't be right to use them. csgo could EASILY be tweaked to have gun balance like 1.3 btw, valve doesn't need to update their engine or anything crazy, they just dont do it because they dont want to.
2016-11-28 04:46
#157
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
Yeah you could completely cancel the draw animations and gibs entirely in 1.6. I don't think CS:GO can be saved at this point, the game is way too old for any major alterations to be considered. They made the initial mistake of taking horrible ideas at the initial phase of CS:GO when it was absolutely horrible. Their feedback was mostly based off American CS:S players.. the game got a lot better, but still not good enough. And you still see major issues with molotovs and smokes to this day.
2016-11-28 04:51
#173
 | 
Argentina juanme555RIP 
''the game is way too old for any major alterations to be considered'' as i said, in terms of possibilities, it is possible for them to make it just like 1.3 , they just wont do it because they do not WANT to. believe it or not, removing spread entirely can be done by just tweaking a couple of cfg's , but as soon as you do that, little CoD and BF migrators will retrieve from csgo and switch back to their games, obviously this will also discourage new players, an update like that would pretty much just please veterans, who as you probably know, VALVe gives about half of a fuck about
2016-11-28 07:11
i'd play 1.6 all day instead of cs:goshit
2016-11-28 03:52
1.6 was the horse update, right?
2016-11-28 04:01
#127
 | 
Brazil arunino 
1.6 > cs:go > GTA5 > shit > dogshit > cs:source
2016-11-28 04:03
well, i totally agree with my brasilian friend <3
2016-11-28 04:06
#134
 | 
Brazil arunino 
<3
2016-11-28 04:07
#156
 | 
Argentina juanme555RIP 
the only good thing that source did for GO's history was giving shit players experience to become veterans when GO was released, let's get real, if you dont play leagues and all you do is MM, you'd take a former cs source player over a former CoD/BF player in your team 24/7. oh...that and the French/Belg pros in go ofc.
2016-11-28 04:49
1.6 required skill csgoo low skill trash game
2016-11-28 04:06
and dats make me sad. when in 1.6 i play on lans and see that in group i play vs seized's mix or some another topmix i know that we probably lose it, cause its not a fkin random game, its all about skill. if someone more skilled than u, then u 95%+ lose thats a fact. in csgo.. well.. in csgo more skilled teams just have maybe more favorite percentage like 60/40 or 70/30, but never 100% cause of random :(
2016-11-28 04:16
csgo is random, there isnt favorite percentage 100% on a team. in cs 1.6 some guys like hally MNR evil were just beasts, but never reached pro scene ( WCG ESWC IEM etc.) . CS 1.6 was hardwork game, there was hierarchy, low-mid-strong
2016-11-28 04:49
ye in 1.6 every semi-pro player should play atleast 5-7 years if he wanna try to reach the top, but anyway low chances. how many talents dead in 1.6 who didnt reach the top cause it was fkin insanely hard. pure example is sweden = u know how many sickest players they have since like 2007 but just few of them reach the top. and experience on lans was an important part. i remember when fnatic kick pita and bring manne and after one event they kick manne and bring pita back :D cause experience to play on lans vs real topteams was a huge factor too. guys should show incredible level + have a talent + be a real hardworker if they want play in a topteam. in russia real hardworker was seized, he was playing on every lan tournament since he was 13 or 14. and funny thing that when csgo released i was sad cause i was like fuck dis guy tries so hard and now his work just means nothing? :D after 1.6 is dead i didnt follow scene, i just forget bout cs and dont know anything bout csgo and was really surprised and happy when i open hltv in the end of 2014 and see that he plays for navi hehe, ye in russia we have some more talented guys on semi-pro scene backdays, but seized was just a guy who really wanna reach the top and work hard for that what we have now? :D every year we get more and more new talents nonamers and they start to play on pro/toplevel instantly. hardwork for 5+ years to reach the top? i arent think that
2016-11-28 05:25
you are absolutely right bro. you are like me, you want quality over quantity
2016-11-28 14:45
the worst thing about csgoo is the run and gun pistols. You'll be on fullbuy, and some rand just 1b's you with a $200 pistol while strafing...cannot deal.
2016-11-28 23:25
#147
 | 
Brazil arunino 
+1
2016-11-28 04:19
1.6 required much more skill Now every 14 yr old with decent aim thinks he has a pro future. Even some pro's have fcking potatoes for heads. Amazing aim. Terrible game sense.
2016-11-28 04:09
hahahaha ! true ! CS 1.6 legendary game, best ever !
2016-11-28 04:18
i miss cs 1.6 a lot of. so fucking good game !! playing it competitive, is better than sex.
2016-11-28 04:19
haha, ye. good old times. fuck, how good was that and how sad am i when i totally understand that those time and feelings never comeback :D
2016-11-28 05:39
that was hurting me because of fact -that will never back, but you need to stand up and go further ! you can do it. im watching some cs 1.6 matches now, just to throw back a little bit, to bring memorries back. again i will repeat it. i miss cs 1.6
2016-11-28 14:53
go play 1.6 then, and stfu about it xD
2016-11-28 04:19
Honestly if you look at how AIDS source was, it's pretty easy to appreciate csgo. 1.6 was the best but you have to move on. Game is dead kid. Csgo is a pretty good game.
2016-11-28 04:55
#160
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
Why aren't you playing Call of Duty then? I'm pretty sure the newest CoD is from this year while CS:GO is almost 5 years old. Since we're not choosing the better game to play, but the newest- why not CoD?
2016-11-28 05:01
Well someone got triggered easily
2016-11-28 09:42
i'm only referring to the game "counter-strike" not call of duty. lol. and we can't choose a game that has graphics like that, if we want to have the good professional coverage that we have today. The entire world has accepted that csgo is the new CS. Just chill. I'm not disagreeing about cs 1.6 being the best. It is.. its just that today's generation doesn't want to start playing some old ass game. no matter how much better it was. And I still say csgo isn't that bad. We have the graphics and the shooting is reasonable. A player can easily be consistent in this game if he puts time in.
2016-11-28 13:48
#227
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
The only similarity between CS 1.6 and CS:GO is the name. Two completely different games- with the only similarities being a few weapons and the basic mission. I really don't see your point here. Also CS:GO is still a rather old game, with outdated graphics. 5 years is a long time in the world of gaming.
2016-11-28 16:21
+1
2016-11-28 05:31
+1 1.6 so much better
2016-11-28 05:44
"but i know the community back in the days was better not complete cancer idiots like today." No, gamers have not changed and will likely never change. The only thing that changed in that situation is you, and your view on things. There was plenty of "cancer idiots" before and there are plenty now. The only real difference is that now that the server browser is in the background of the game, less people play "fun" modes and therefore the mood is more competitive and more fierce than it was before, which tends to increase toxicity a bit. But overall you'll find the same immature and raging kids as you had in 1.6 or Source.
2016-11-28 05:47
#176
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
Sure there were cancerous people, of course toxic people have always existed in any community. But it wasn't popular for the vast majority of people to be 4chan wannabe edgelords. Just like in real life, there are bound to be a certain small amount of douchebags being the loud minority. But in this generation, it's the vast majority. People actually talking like normal human beings, being helpful when people asked questions/needed help on this site.. and altogether keeping a tone which didn't yell "look at me, I'm loud like the rest" while copy-pasting the same mildly funny thing over and over, until you puke. -Also, I've noticed that for the most part "baiting" and "trolling" is used as an excuse to talk about something people haven't got a clue about. If someone is caught talking out of their ass, or just being plain stupid- he has suddenly "baited" the other guy. It's really pathetic. And yes, I do realize that this tendency isn't exclusive to CS:GO, as it 's seen all around any gaming community nowadays. That doesn't make it less pathetic. "Whew, look at me. I don't like what other people like, I don't do what other people do." Yes you are and yes you do, as the majority are exactly like you. There are so many similarities between emo kids and 4chan wannabes.
2016-11-28 07:40
Nah, it's just your own perception. As I said, just the same gamers all over again. You changed, and you see the next generation with the eyes of the previous one, and as in most cases, the previous generation thinks it was better back when the games they grew up with were still popular, and the next generation will become a previous generation and think it was better before, and so on. This phenomenon is taking place in any field, not just video games, and it never fails to repeat itself. The good old generational conflict. This syndrome of thinking that everything gets worse as soon as we start to grow older and the things we love become old fashioned and unpopular and the things we didn't grow to appreciate replace them. Just for fun, bookmark this thread and come back on HLTV or whatever gaming website ten years from now, you'll see the current teen generation moaning about how better it was in the 2010 years and about how better the community was back then and so on. It's an endless cycle filled with cognitive biases to make us feel better about what we did and didn't do. But nothing new under the sun I'm afraid.
2016-11-28 07:50
#179
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
Just a lot of rambling. It isn't hard to provide proof when I was talking about this website in particular.. you can literally go back to any thread prior to 2012 to see that I'm right.
2016-11-28 08:12
Yup, I can go back any year on this website and find examples supporting both a positive side and a negative side of the community. Just as I will be able to do so 10 years from now, in the same proportions. But hey, if you feel that you're exempted from the natural human biases, don't mind me. The meeting is set, see you in ten years.
2016-11-28 09:24
#185
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
It's quite factual there were much, MUCH less of this trolling that I account as the toxic behavior we're talking about. Once again, easily proven by looking at the forums. If you haven't noticed the massive increase of this 4chan behavior getting popular among most people on the internet, then you haven't been around for long. The fact that some (you?) don't agree that the anti-social 4chan behavior is bad is an entirely different thing. If that's your point, then sure call me an old fart. I won't change my mind on that.
2016-11-28 09:31
I don't have much to add other than what I already said above.
2016-11-28 10:55
#228
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
Yeah, and what you said above does absolutely nothing to argue against my point. I was never talking about the fact that there are always gonna be bad apples, that's pretty much a universally accepted fact?
2016-11-28 16:22
Yes, all I said above (I wasn't talking only about my last comment) argued against that, but you seem to believe that you somehow escape human bias so I don't see what I should add really. The claim that you made is just that, a claim, and would require huge amount of statistical analysis on forum posts to really being changed into something at least a bit factual (of course the very subjective terms "trolling" or "toxic behavior" would compromise the factual part in some way, but that could be worked around with a rigorous method). This claim is based on your perception and I'm trying to say that your perception is biased and that there's roughly the same proportion of toxicity or "bad behavior" in any sufficiently big population sample, in any generation. There's no harm in being biased, we all are. I fell into the "generation war" trap, I will probably fall into it again, and you as well. The worst thing about biases is that even though you know about them you can still be subject to them without realizing it.
2016-11-28 20:30
#247
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
would require huge amount of statistical analysis on forum posts to really being changed into something at least a bit factual Unless you have been active on HLTV.org daily, prior to 2012. Of course. No I am not biased, the fact that you don't have a clue whether I'm right or wrong doesn't automatically make me biased. Maybe stop assuming stuff, when you simply don't know?
2016-11-29 04:32
"Unless you have been active on HLTV.org daily, prior to 2012. Of course." No, even if you have been active prior to 2012 it wouldn't change anything. Something factual requires more than simply people's opinion or perception, whether it's mine, yours, or anyone's. Something factual comes from reproducible experiments and analysis. So even if you're basing your claims on your memory of what were the forums like prior to 2012, it doesn't make your claims factual. "No I am not biased, the fact that you don't have a clue whether I'm right or wrong doesn't automatically make me biased." Oh I do have a clue. I'm not completely certain, since I'm not completely certain of anything, but I do have a clue. What makes you biased is not my degree of certainty for it though. It's the fact that you're a human being (which means you have biases like any other human being) and that your argument is the same made by pretty much any generation before you and that it was already found to be a cognitive bias by science. Hence my relative confidence in you being biased when making these claims. But this is not "automatic" however, there's still the possibility that I'm wrong and that indeed the situation you're describing is verified factually, but again, you'll need more than your own memory to prove this, and simply claiming that it is so will not make it so.
2016-11-29 18:22
#252
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
I am certain, because the distinction is as clear as it is. Simple. If it was just a matter of a trolling vocal minority- which will always be present on any forum- I wouldn't be talking about it. I simply don't feel the need to prove it, as you can easily use the forum to search for older threads and see it as clear as day. If I presented you with specific threads, you would call it biased. It's all there for you to see. Yes, there were always these "-player +player" and "topX players" threads, but the scene actually idolized the journalists (especially Nix0n) on this site, and the atmosphere was very friendly overall. When amateur fragvideos were shared, the overall reaction would be positive, or constructive criticism- unlike the trolling and billions of dislikes you see now... When most people disagreed with one another, it was rare to see people turn to insulting... even with less moderation than there is now. There weren't these blatant hunts for 1st comments, and fans of opposing teams would mostly have friendly conversations with one another (which skin betting- and money betting have ruined). Just a few examples
2016-11-29 18:31
"I am certain, because the distinction is as clear as it is. Simple. " Same problem as before. "I simply don't feel the need to prove it" I hope so, because it would require quite some work. "If I presented you with specific threads, you would call it biased." You're right, this cannot be solved by just taking a few specific examples. And if I were to do the same, the same problem would arise. That's why it's likely that neither of our opinions will be confirmed factually, unless someone really motivated accepts the challenge. "as you can easily use the forum to search for older threads and see it as clear as day" "It's all there for you to see." Nope, since I'm extremely limited in time and resources, I would only be able to search through a tiny fraction of the huge quantity available. Besides, without a proper scientific method put in place, I would be subject to the normal biases a human has. If your memory isn't enough to establish facts, what makes you think that my perception and memory alone will be enough? So yes, I could browse through these threads to alter or confirm my opinion, but it wouldn't bring out any fact on the matter.
2016-11-29 18:35
#254
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
It's not my problem that you have limited time to see it for yourself. Yes, looking back at general popular threads from 2005-2010 (with about 100-500 replies) would easily demonstrate my point. I know I'm right.. that's the difference.
2016-11-29 18:37
"It's not my problem that you have limited time to see it for yourself." Well, it is if your concern is to prove your claim factually and if you expect me to prove it. But if you don't expect me to prove it then it's fine, we can simply agree to disagree. "Yes, looking back at general popular threads from 2005-2010 (with about 100-500 replies) would easily demonstrate my point." Unfortunately, as already said, it would require more than just "looking". But you're entitled to your opinion. "I know I'm right.. that's the difference." That's one difference, but unfortunately knowing you're right doesn't necessarily make you right, or the world would be much simpler (or more chaotic). The other main difference is that you take your memory as evidence for facts while I do not.
2016-11-29 18:50
#257
 | 
Denmark Notallama 
Well, it is if your concern is to prove your claim factually and if you expect me to prove it. But if you don't expect me to prove it then it's fine, we can simply agree to disagree. Well no, not only is it impossible for me to do those "calculations" that you're talking about, but if you are too lazy to even do a small check up on it- then I honestly can't see why you are even discussing it in the first place. Then I honstly shouldn't take your non-opinion on the matter seriously in any way. Unfortunately, as already said, it would require more than just "looking". But you're entitled to your opinion. No, it wouldn't. As I said, it will be very apparent by a quick glimpse- especially if you look at any popular thread around 2008 (which takes less time to do, than to write your entire post). That's one difference, but unfortunately knowing you're right doesn't necessarily make you right Yes it does. The fact that you question me being right is another thing. I could also say that Einstein's theory of relativity was wrong until someone provided sustainable proof, because I was too lazy to find mathematical proof of the theory in question. The burden of proof isn't on me, as the proof is already here- on the same goddamn site we're on as we speak. Memory isn't even needed. You can keep disregarding everything I say on the subject until you do a quick search and find out that I'm right... but until then I just really don't care about your opinion, as it isn't based on anything whatsoever.
2016-11-29 19:26
"Well no, not only is it impossible for me to do those "calculations" that you're talking about, but if you are too lazy to even do a small check up on it- then I honestly can't see why you are even discussing it in the first place. Then I honstly shouldn't take your non-opinion on the matter seriously in any way." Again, I could very well have a look at pre-2012 threads, that wouldn't settle anything, regardless of the fact that my opinion would change or not. We would still be in the same situation regarding the factual aspect of your claims. If that's sufficient for you not to take my "non-opinion" on the matter seriously, then so be it. "No, it wouldn't. As I said, it will be very apparent by a quick glimpse- especially if you look at any popular thread around 2008 (which takes less time to do, than to write your entire post)." Same problem as above, and yes, it would, for the reasons I explained again and again. I'm just as likely to be subject to bias and since I'm only human I can only look at a tiny fraction of those threads, which would be very likely to skew the results only because of the small sample. So sure, if I look at these threads it might give me something to either change or maintain my opinion, but it wouldn't prove anything regarding the factual aspect of your claims (in any side, right or wrong) "Yes it does." No, it doesn't. Just as for any person really. Knowing being right and being right are two separate things. There are millions and millions of people who are 100% sure of things that have been proven time and time again to be wrong, or simply (as in your case) neither been proven nor disproved. These people are convinced to be right of course, but that won't change the facts. You might be right of course. But you might be wrong. And keeping arguing that you're right with only your word or your memory as a base is useless. Just as it's useless to claim that me looking at threads will determine if you're right or wrong. It simply won't. At most it would change my opinion to your side, which is clearly not the same thing as you being right (or wrong). "I could also say that Einstein's theory of relativity was wrong until someone provided sustainable proof, because I was too lazy to find mathematical proof of the theory in question." The difference is that the maths have already been done for this and Einstein's theory is used every day to make our satellites work just as intended. There's no opinion to have on the theory of relativity since it's been factually proven, unlike your hypothesis, where no analysis and no stats have been done whatsoever. The only thing used is your opinion based on your memory and your interpretation of threads. That's more than sufficient to make an opinion, but that's really not enough to be able to establish a fact. "The burden of proof isn't on me, as the proof is already here- on the same goddamn site we're on as we speak. Memory isn't even needed." The burden of proof is on you because you're the one who's making a claim, the claim that (to simplify) people were behaving less negatively before 2012 than after. If the proof was already there, all I would need would be to look at it, just as I only need to look at the scientific studies if I need proof of a scientific claim. But for the reasons I explained several times, the proof isn't here (yet). What you have is some data, which can be used to obtain evidence. But it has to be processed a certain way in order to extract the most objective conclusion possible. And that process is certainly not "me looking at a tiny tiny fraction of the data and just give my opinion on it". "You can keep disregarding everything I say on the subject until you do a quick search and find out that I'm right... but until then I just really don't care about your opinion, as it isn't based on anything whatsoever." I certainly do NOT disregard everything you say on the subject. I value your opinion, otherwise I wouldn't still be talking to you. I'm just trying to explain that your opinion is not equivalent to evidence, despite what you seem to think. I think you do care about my opinion. Otherwise you would have stopped answering me a long time ago. But I'm not in your head, maybe you have other reasons to continue this discussion despite not caring about anything I say ^^.
2016-11-30 09:28
"If your memory isn't enough to establish facts, what makes you think that my perception and memory alone will be enough?" It's not only him saying that the community was much better. Take ANY person that has been around from 2002 to 2012, and he will tell you that the forum has changed in a negative manner. It's not like human nature has suddenly changed, or kids were different back then, but the forum was for sure.
2016-12-05 13:10
And it's likely that it will be the same bias. It's not for nothing that you see whole generations having the same opinion against another one. People who dislike a change communicate on that change and those who dislike the change agree with it and spread the idea as well, and so on. You don't need only one person for a bias to exist. I do not claim that the people who think the forums were better before are lying or delusional. I think that's really what they experience. I'm only claiming that it's likely to be the result of a very common human bias and has not been factually proven at all, and it would require much more than opinions to do so.
2016-12-05 17:49
1. open steam 2. Install CS 1.6 3. Run CS 1.6 4. Play in CS 1.6 5. Profit
2016-11-28 06:55
#175
shox | 
Norway fen0m 
Csgo would be good if valve woud stop riding dota 2's dick
2016-11-28 07:26
#180
 | 
Belarus ALBiNh0 
i played 1.6 and older versions for like 11 years before csgo and don't miss the old game at all..
2016-11-28 08:17
a game that has worse graphics than minecraft and models are so big u cant miss them > csgo lel
2016-11-28 09:45
the quality of competitive esports titles has very little to do with graphics and much more to do with gameplay 'models are so big you can't miss them' you obviously never played 1.6 and even if you did you were certainly trash at it. if you had played 1.6 and been even decent at it you would be able to make some logical statements as to why you think CS go is better. then again you're just some 760k id newfag so what should i expect
2016-11-28 09:48
I thought that lel would spoil that im not serious. But yeah, only pros that were pros in 1.6 era, can tell which game is better in competive aspect.
2016-11-28 11:05
#192
 | 
Singapore derpydm 
CS:CZ clearly best CS game retards
2016-11-28 10:15
cs 1.6 is obviously the better game but there is no valve sponsorship in it hence no pros playing it hence the general public moves to csgo. you can still play cs 1.6 if you have people to set up scrims and 10 mans with. No one is stopping you.
2016-11-28 10:18
cs go has better graphics, better physics, better sound fidelity, awesome skins, knives=better game u only say 1.6 is better because u have bias and nostalgia but in reality cs go is far superior in every aspect
2016-11-28 10:58
#201
 | 
Luxembourg wzunress 
nobody forces you to play csgo. go back to your perfect game and shut up.
2016-11-28 11:23
1.6 is gone but not forgotten, accept it. CSGO seriously lacks duckwalk.
2016-11-28 11:28
CS:GO > CS:S > CS 1.6
2016-11-28 11:27
1.6 best cssssssssssss
2016-11-28 11:27
I guess you're right... 1.6 was amazing, maybe not really better, but at least it worked well, without the bugs. CS:GO would be better if it played well.
2016-11-28 14:06
1.6 was abouyt pure skill cs go is random shit (stopped playing a yr ago btw)
2016-11-28 14:55
Then don't talk about it like you know pal :)
2016-11-28 14:58
??? who says i dont know?
2016-11-28 15:43
#237
 | 
United States ThetaSigma11 
It's obvious you don't know what you're talking about now. CSGO isn't just "random shit"
2016-11-28 20:46
CS Goo is totally random dude. It's just run and gun trash A much higher skillled player can still get rekt by a noob cause of RNG and spammable pistols. That would never happen in 1.6
2016-11-28 23:27
You're right, you aren't a crying old veteran. You are a complaining, entitled noob
2016-11-28 14:58
so why dont you go play 1.6 instead of crying ? do whatever you want bro nobody cares.
2016-11-28 15:48
Saying 1.6 is better than csgo is like saying Runescape classic is better than Rs3/07.
2016-11-28 15:52
#285
dv | 
United Kingdom dv-_- 
Classic is 10 times better than both those games!
2016-12-05 12:30
Csgo is better,cs 1.6 is good but not as csgo
2016-11-28 15:54
#219
 | 
Palestine hevCS 
cs 1.6 > CSGO > CSS
2016-11-28 16:05
1.6 > csgo
2016-11-28 16:08
#221
 | 
United States Vox_Lunae 
lol, look at these old fucktards crying about 1.6. Face it, your game was shit until valve made it good by making csgo
2016-11-28 16:09
Go play COD on fucking console dumb burger. Like u know anything..
2016-11-28 16:15
#240
 | 
United States Vox_Lunae 
b8ed lul
2016-11-28 21:08
#234
roman | 
Palestine ndr[o] 
hahahahaha :D
2016-11-28 20:33
#222
 | 
Brazil vass28 
1.6 best game ever
2016-11-28 16:10
Yeah I remember playing cs with my irl friends and finding players to play with on mirc. Usually we got some Germans so we play 1 map in their servers and 1 map on our :) Good times..
2016-11-28 16:11
Yes i play with Serbians always lol
2016-12-04 19:30
1.6
2016-11-28 16:18
truth
2016-11-28 20:32
#235
 | 
Brazil ftf123 
1.6 >>>>> CSGO
2016-11-28 20:41
CS 1.5 > CS 1.6
2016-11-28 20:44
#238
 | 
Russia xtkjdtr01 
U know what is nostalgia ? Everything woulb be better if u plyaed it in good old times
2016-11-28 20:49
CS Source was the problem
2016-11-28 20:49
CS Source was so bad compared to 1.6 back in the day, but now in comparison even CS source is a lot bettter than CS GOO
2016-11-28 23:26
Why do you think Cs:Go is so bad?
2016-11-28 23:27
Mainly cause of run and gun and spammable pistols
2016-11-28 23:28
#248
 | 
United States ldKuKluxKlan 
Forum Listed under CSGO Jesus HLTV users are braindead
2016-11-29 04:36
#249
 | 
United States NotGayLOL 
You guys aren't seeing that 1.6 has many flaws lke CS:GO, nothing is perfect, you just have to deal with it that 1.6 is dead and suck it up, nothing will happen to it, it won't jump up in players by you guys whining.
2016-11-29 04:55
#250
 | 
Serbia whoa!! 
just reduce pistols's moving accuracy, damage dealt at long range and we are good to go.
2016-11-29 04:57
1.6 is dead and even 4 years ago cs 1.6 didn't have events like this and some much fans. I know the 1.6 had the most skilled players but is old and dead.
2016-11-30 09:30
#260
 | 
France [SPQR] 
Whatever, Vulva murdered 1.6 by using the most perfidious update of hell and destruction in march 2013. RIP
2016-11-30 09:40
SO FUCKING TRUE! First comment that makes sense here, FUCK 2013 UPDATE AND VALVE they made it on porpouse se we could move to CSGO.
2016-12-04 19:31
1.6 is DEAD after 2013 update! Valve made it on porpouse so we could move to csgo. What they did in 2013? - The game run like source, so smooth it hurts and bhop is much slower like VSYNC is turned but it's not - Recoil is so fucked up, you can't 1 tap the recoil is random in 1.6 - Registry problems you can't hit for shit - Players tearing while walking and move like aids inpossible to hit
2016-12-04 19:35
That's funny when people say that CS 1.6 is dead: i.imgur.com/6cdwe8E.jpg This screenshot was taken few minutes ago.
2016-12-04 19:37
Those people don't even realise they have recoil & registry problems, they don't play on pro level
2016-12-05 01:45
This server is running on a reverse-engineered and modified engine. Recoil and hit register works far better than in cs:go.
2016-12-05 11:21
There were no hitbox malfunctions and ran smoother at same framerate. I dont understand how csgo is so fucked when it comes to shooting
2016-12-04 19:39
head hitboxes were the size of trucks so yeah csgo isnt fucked, its one of the only shooters without hitboxes 3x larger than the model and lag compensation that makes half your misses hit if you aim at the wrong pixel, or your weapon isnt accurate, you wont hit. thats not the games fault the game does need high fps to run well, thats indeed a problem
2016-12-05 12:06
no its not /close
2016-12-05 11:50
Dont Like it? Dont play <3
2016-12-05 12:01
Yesterday played 1.6 and it felt sooooo damn goood <3
2016-12-05 12:34
#287
dv | 
United Kingdom dv-_- 
I hate the whole "don't like it? don't play it" remarks. Everyone who owns the game is entitled to their opinion and criticisms. If no-one complained about anything CS:GO would still be the utter mess it was on release. Obviously 1.6 is dead and not coming back but there is nothing wrong with Valve taking a couple things that worked really well for CS 1.6, and implementing them as a means to improve the game for everyone.
2016-12-05 12:52
Well said. By the way I remember you playing against some top team (was it mTw?). You lost like 16-4, which is still an achievement :D
2016-12-05 13:37
#302
dv | 
United Kingdom dv-_- 
haha, good memory! It was actually duttdutt with pronax & manne, can't remember the rest. youtube.com/watch?v=V6z-LSkNHmM
2016-12-05 18:24
#290
 | 
Germany gg-wp 
CSGO became a solid game of Counter Strike and hitboxes are fine. In fact they are so good that I never make the game guilty when I fail my shots. I always feel in CSGO if I made something correctly and was on point with the crosshair or not. 1.6 is legendary and even I as a diehard sourcer from 2004 until CSGO came out played it a tiny bit here and there and maybe I played it way to less than it earns, but time goes on and there is no way 1.6 will ever make it back to the competitive state it once was. Quake 3 Arena had it's time and it was a blast, 1.6 had it's time it also was a blost for many of you guys. But now it's all about CSGO and the upcoming Quake Champions and Quake Champions from what I have read yet will be an uber esports quality shooter exactly as CSGO and will propably become legendary as Quake 3. It's a safecall to say, the only real team (Quake Champions will also get a specific and special team mode that's still in secret yet besides the regular one on one arena competitoin) and one on one shooter worth to call in 2017 will be Quake Champions and the good old CSGO. You can try to find other games if you like some action which are equally good compared to CSGO and Quake Champions but you just won't find them cause they simply do not exist. ID Software does everything to make Quake Champions a real PC only esports title with an engine you gain enough frames with as I have read. ID uses two Engines to be concrete for Quake Champions. They already invited guys like the old school arena master fatality to their basement to make them test it and i have read quake champions has everything to offer quake 3 did with some extras on top and also the good strafe and bhop movement. better be ready causxe it's gonne be huge.
2016-12-05 13:23
CS1.6 is not dead if you look at player base around 80k daily, but if you just play the game for 10-20 minutes you will realise that game is fucked up. 1.6 used to by smooth and at the same time sharp back in 2012 but after 2013 update Valve did it on porpouse and made this game look like shit. Who don't have recoil and registry problems in cs1.6 is lucky bastard, period :)
2016-12-05 13:50
I liked the sounds better in 1.6, that's for sure.
2016-12-05 14:50
#305
 | 
Macau Lass3YAOW 
They are a company of course they are trying to make money?
2016-12-06 08:59
CR4ZY
1.62
SKADE
2.16
Lucid Dream
3.16
MiTH.Maple
1.35
North
1.52
Sprout
2.47
Bet value
Amount of money to be placed
Winning
Odds total ratio
-
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.