Thread has been deleted
Last comment
US Tanks in Poland
SpawN | 
Sweden Muslim_Svensson 
youtube.com/watch?v=v5UZhNFJjJo wtf, Poland and USA ready to invasion Russia?
2017-03-31 17:23
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
'Merica!
2017-03-31 17:25
#79
 | 
Indonesia Tuvny1 
Largest nightmare for Putin? You're fucking joking aren't you? This group of equipment, whilst impressive in real terms to us as individuals, pales into insignificance when you start looking at things on the strategic level. The Russian Southern Military district which opposes this region consists of 13 full strength Divisions supplemented by a further 22 Regiments. We're talking 195,000 troops, 700 Main battle tanks, 1000 Infantry fighting vehicles, 1500 APCs, 1000 artillery pieces (mixed SPG, Rocket and towed), 376 Jets and 40 Attack helicopters. The region is also covered by various units from Russia's strategic missile force. So the United States has sent 3500 troops with 80 Abrams, 140 Bradley and 15 Paladins supported by 400 odd tracked vehicles and a few hundred trucks and that's supposed to be the biggest nightmare for Putin and his pals in the Kremlin? Who the fuck are you kidding? I'm reading a list of dumbfuck comments down below, so let me set the record straight for some of you keyboard warriors with zero military experience and limited knowledge on militaries at the strategic, operational or tactical levels (mainly the first two). The United States is currently the world's only surviving superpower (my country, Britain ceased being one in the 50s and the USSR collapsed in 1991) and it owes this to it's Navy and to a slightly lesser extent, it's Air Force. This is because it is these that allow it to project America's might across the globe and then importantly to sustain it. This is all well and dandy when either fighting small nations or larger nations operating away from their own borders i.e. if the US was to engage in conflict with Russia or China in battle somewhere like South Africa, the United States would have a clear advantage. However both of the aforementioned foes have large armed forces which if engaged near to their borders, are able themselves to be sustained and therefore to resist American military force. When it comes to Eastern Europe, Russia has a marked advantage over the United States. The United States has a large armed forces but it is committed to different areas across the world, trying to establish and subsequently prop up American foreign policy, the Russians are not active globally and therefore a higher percentage of their forces (almost all of them) are focused at hotspots either within their nation or along its borders. It is able to bring huge numbers of men and equipment to bear in these areas and Eastern Europe is one of them. Eastern Europe (the parts where the areas of contention are) have limited access via sea and the waters close to it are where the Russians, rather sensibly, focus their own rather formidable Naval force (albeit a different kind of force i.e. one that doesn't focus on carriers and global power projection). Operating in this theatre, the Russians are able to watch NATO forces movements and would be able to head off an attack early on whilst operating under cover of strategic and nuclear missile forces inside the Russian borders. Their Aircraft would also be able to operate from within Russia and would have the protection across a large radius from the high concentration of Russian SAM complex which is funnily enough the largest in the world. This means that the USAF would struggle to get air supremacy and would certainly never achieve the kind of impunity that it did in Iraq or Afghanistan where it had no issues imposing a no fly zone. So that is one of America's key playing pieces reduced (though certainly not totally nullified) and this would change the situation on the ground where the ground forces would have to destroy more of Russia's assets themselves. This in itself is difficult as Russia has the numerical advantage in MBTs, IFVs, APCs, AAs, SAMs, Artillery, aircraft (don't forget that whilst the US has more aircraft, they are around the world and could not possibly all be deployed in the area) and whilst many of you are sitting back and calling the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation a "rust bucket" the reality is that, having suffered from stagnation post collapse of the USSR, the Russians have been building themselves back up, introducing new technologies and refurbishing that which is older, their defence budget has been increasing at unprecedented levels for the last 10 years and the damage they could easily inflict on US forces with their conventional forces is absolutely massive. To summarize, a direct conflict between the US and Russia (as opposed to a proxy conflict) is an absolute non starter. It would crash world markets damaging both economies, it would wreak untold damage on the structure of both armed forces as well as the infrastructure of Russia and Eastern Europe and would quite possibly result in nuclear weapons being deployed. Many people on here and more worryingly in government seem to think that Russia will roll over if we apply economic and military pressure upon them. The reality is that it will galvanize them and as we've seen in the past 10 years they will lash out albeit not directly at our own forces but those of our allies as well as our other interests situated within their sphere. Perhaps rather than being petulant and inflammatory, the United States and her allies should try and be more progressive and inclusive, some of you will likely say that I'm a "libtard" or a "snow flake" but the reality is that I am neither. I am a conservative and a member of the Armed Forces, it is my life and the lives of my brothers and sisters that would be gambled if the tension was to be ratcheted up and whilst we would go as we were told and do as we were told, the reality is that within the various militaries of NATO we understand and respect the capabilities of the Russian Federation and the implications of engaging in a conflict with them right on their own doostepp.....
2017-04-01 10:21
#82
 | 
Croatia mds818 
The bad part is that i have readed this bible.
2017-04-01 10:31
#149
 | 
India TYZ4 
Mother Russia is ready 9gag.com/gag/aAdP5P9
2017-04-03 19:45
LOL +1
2017-04-03 21:42
#88
 | 
Turkey tastemycobra 
stfu reverse poland xd
2017-04-01 10:57
#96
 | 
Indonesia Tuvny1 
excuse me?!
2017-04-02 08:57
Yellow teeth fakeflagger , LOL . Superpower country UK pick 1
2017-04-02 11:21
#110
 | 
Indonesia Tuvny1 
what? since when uk is superpower lol? back 1800s with queen and king maybe?
2017-04-02 11:25
then you're indonesian ? " (my country, Britain ceased being one in the 50s and the USSR collapsed in 1991)
2017-04-02 11:35
#114
 | 
Indonesia Tuvny1 
what else has this flag?
2017-04-02 11:38
Ok that was my mistake for being misunderstood your comment . [ The United States is currently the world's only surviving superpower (my country, Britain ceased being one in the 50s and the USSR collapsed in 1991 ] OK you just said indonesia was one of the world superpower back on nearly 70 years ago . LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL. -Indonesia -Superpower Pick 1 .
2017-04-02 11:47
#121
 | 
Indonesia Tuvny1 
Indonesia is SEA biggest Military we even defeat the dutch during revolution. but i find my main post on the yt sections :) wkwk
2017-04-02 12:39
lollllllllllllllllllllllll, hey i'm a post-hardcore - metalcore listener too but i hate kpop
2017-04-02 12:54
#131
 | 
Netherlands HetIsPatat 
You defeated nothing. How DARE you not be thankful for the land we gave you?! You are mere plebs! Begone with thee wild savages!
2017-04-03 09:24
#135
 | 
Indonesia Tuvny1 
think what you want but we know what we know my friend
2017-04-03 12:03
#133
 | 
Turkey tastemycobra 
just a joke my friend xd
2017-04-03 09:38
great read, cheers m8
2017-04-01 18:16
EZ US rail gun satellite in space. Kinetic rods to rekt confirmed
2017-04-02 09:51
Drop one fucking bomb. One fucking bomb. The biggest you can. There´s tons of your military troops gone. Size of military troops means shit nowadays. A few bombs which hit and you have an erased country. Doesnt matter which one.
2017-04-02 11:42
#147
 | 
Liechtenstein (Ys) 
You're making this sound way too simple. This is not a videogame. ABM's are standard affair. Also it takes some time from launch to detonation, meaning there is enough room for counter-attacks. Nuclear deterrance is (still) a thing. So launching your biggest baddest weaponry is not the smartest of choices.
2017-04-03 19:11
good analysis. usa is playing with fire. they can't even handle Taliban, how are they gonna handle Russian army. it's not even possible, and they know this very well. they just playing the superpower role, but in fact they woulda get rekt ezpez in a week and sent home.
2017-04-03 09:56
#176
 | 
United States hehexddd 
xdxdxdxd
2017-04-03 22:32
Mercia!
2017-03-31 17:26
#3
 | 
Poland aleks2805 
It's to defend eu if russia want invade eu we're the wall.
2017-03-31 17:26
#46
huyak | 
Russia 50bombs 
Do you really believe dat shit? :)
2017-03-31 18:20
#48
 | 
Sweden Swedz 
Says ruskie :) prepare to die
2017-03-31 18:23
#49
huyak | 
Russia 50bombs 
We all die someday my Muslim friend:)
2017-03-31 18:27
valar morgulis!
2017-04-03 22:22
#74
 | 
CIS XoBB1T_HD 
np noarmy, ur country is shit without EU and USA
2017-04-01 09:27
#141
 | 
Poland Totali_ 
Its better to stay with Russia than getting fucked by american propaganda...
2017-04-03 17:19
you are naive if u think someone wants to protect you and care about you
2017-04-01 03:05
#59
 | 
Poland aleks2805 
So do u think all ppl on this planet are naive because they think their families care and protect them?
2017-04-01 08:21
i mean someone foreign, not your family or your closest people
2017-04-01 10:49
#90
 | 
Poland aleks2805 
Meby they do not care about us but they care about bussnies in rest of eu and we're making it more safe by being a wall.
2017-04-01 14:57
They were "making business" in south east countries too for example: - Iraq - Afghan - Syria - Libya and a lot of more... And now these countries are fcked up. Do you know how Libya was looking before they killed Kaddafi in 2011? youtube.com/watch?v=XorKTwkFPDU And why they killed him? Because he wanted to invent new United Africa value based on gold- no fcking papers like money which u can print. So they eliminated him together with fcking France's government. Now France's nation is paying for it.
2017-04-01 15:08
Define 'paying for it' when refering to Lybia pls.
2017-04-02 13:01
I think u know what i mean. Moammar Gaddafi said: "If I go down, Europe goes black" and now your country is on first target because your government bring war to these countries
2017-04-02 17:59
#136
FYRR73 | 
Latvia Syecr 
+1111
2017-04-03 12:06
#93
Ex6TenZ | 
Finland qBeY 
You're dumb af if you think Russia is any threat to the USA or any western countries
2017-04-01 15:11
You're fihting a vain war. Too many eastern european people user on hltv and they still have cold war mentalities.
2017-04-02 13:02
#4
NEO | 
Poland Trausky 
No, we r going to take Lviv back
2017-03-31 17:26
Polish Lviv!!!! :DDD
2017-04-01 08:52
#99
 | 
Poland Commonwealth 
Wilno too.
2017-04-02 09:19
Take it. There are lots of brain dead polacks.
2017-04-02 09:46
#126
 | 
Poland Commonwealth 
Sure Lithuanian noob:DD
2017-04-02 13:50
I take you are one of alot delusional polacks
2017-04-03 09:17
#139
 | 
Poland Commonwealth 
What are you taking?
2017-04-03 14:05
That you are delusional polak
2017-04-03 19:37
#150
 | 
Poland Commonwealth 
So you're taking me somewhere?
2017-04-03 19:46
The only advantage that tanks have nowadays is that they are cheap compared to jets. A F-35 jet would destroy more than 500 tanks single-handedly. If they want to invade, they will bring the Raptors + F-35
2017-03-31 17:27
HhAhAHa was is not VIDEO GAME.
2017-03-31 17:29
HhAhAHa was is not VIDEO GAME.
2017-03-31 17:29
HhAhAHa was is not VIDEO GAME.
2017-03-31 17:32
HhAhAHa was is not VIDEO GAME.
2017-03-31 18:18
HhAhAHa was is not VIDEO GAME.
2017-04-01 08:56
#101
kennyS | 
World DS1337 
HhAhAHa was is not VIDEO GAME.
2017-04-02 09:28
you have no idea what are you talking abt kid
2017-03-31 17:50
Yea, they have sv_infinite_ammo 1 aswell
2017-04-01 08:55
that's why i said tanks are cheaper
2017-04-01 08:58
#77
 | 
Europe smasherrr 
stop talking about something if you dont have any idea. how can you compare tanks with jets? like wtf
2017-04-01 09:41
don't try to act like a smart guy when you are not. how do u imagine a tank hitting a flying jet with 1000 km/h, that's why the people invented defense missiles just like the S-400. A tank can hit a jet only if the jet is on the ground. It's another question how much the missiles of the jet and the tank cost
2017-04-01 10:11
#81
 | 
Europe smasherrr 
Ofc jets are stronger thats unquestionable. But comparing them is just stupid. Jets are 10000x more expensive than tanks. And you shouldnt enter your tanks to an area without protecting them with your air defense missiles. If you do ofc 1 f35 can destroy all of them
2017-04-01 10:24
#127
Ex6TenZ | 
Finland qBeY 
anti-aircraft would destroy the F-35 before it could even get close to the tanks
2017-04-02 14:12
Do you actually believe that crap Russian propaganda. You do realize that the F-35 has never been tested to its real potential, don't you? Or all you know about the F-35 is what RT said about it?
2017-04-03 17:34
#146
Ex6TenZ | 
Finland qBeY 
that's what anti-aircraft does. Shoots down aircraft. lmfao
2017-04-03 18:53
Yeah ok you're totally clueless.
2017-04-03 20:03
#152
Ex6TenZ | 
Finland qBeY 
what the fuck are you baiting for? lol
2017-04-03 20:06
I'm not baiting. I genuinely think that you're a retard.
2017-04-03 21:24
#156
Ex6TenZ | 
Finland qBeY 
So you think that cause it's a stealth fighter it is somehow invincible and can go on destroy 500 tanks single-handedly? Obviously it can get spotted too. If you have some reasonable argument please explain
2017-04-03 21:28
AA is vague term. It can very from a 12.7 mm machine gun mounted on top of a tank, all the way up to a SAM site. While SAM sites might be able to harm this plane, most it would stay way out of the range of most AA weapons. This plane also has a all kinds of countermeasures like the stealth system, jammers, flares and so on. Most SAMs in use nowadays would most likely be unable to maintain a lock on this plane anyway. Plus there are certain combat maneuvers that a capable could pull off in order to shake a lock off his aircraft. If Apache helicopters and A-10 slaughtered Sadam's army (a top 10 army in the world at the time) while suffering hardly any losses, I'm sure that this aircraft can do just as much damage, if not even more, at least as far as the ground attack missions go.
2017-04-03 21:39
#167
Ex6TenZ | 
Finland qBeY 
Well I didn't really think it as those 500 tanks' SAM missiles but rather as army's air defense that could get down a stealth fighter trying to destroy 500 tanks. This whole argument is completely absurd + I have no idea where you got that "russian propaganda" from
2017-04-03 21:57
'but rather as army's air defense' what exactly are you referring to? The 'army's air defense' ranges from AA guns to SAM sites. No offense but you're totally clueless. Why are you even debating a topic you know nothing about? 'This whole argument is completely absurd + I have no idea where you got that "russian propaganda" from' Most people who deny the F-35's capabilities have got their info from two main sources: the Russian media and Pierre Sprey who was part of the designing team that led projects such as the F-16 and A-10 and who claims that the F-35 is useless, despite not being involved in the plane's creation. He based his arguments on pretty much what the general public knows which is obviously insufficient information since most information is classified. Not only that, but the plane has never been tested to its full potential. So technically, not even the army knows if this plane is good or not. And yes, that was an argument since, yet again, most people who deny the plane's capabilities use these sources for their claims. Since you know nothing about the topic you weren't even unable to acknowledge the reference. At this point I'm not even sure why you're still here but I guess that for idiots, having a crap opinion is more important than getting themselves educated on the topic first and speaking afterwards.
2017-04-03 22:08
#183
Ex6TenZ | 
Finland qBeY 
I'm not denying any capabilities I'm just arguing againt absurd accusation that tanks are useless. Ofc both tanks and and planes have their places in army cause why would they exist otherwise, that's what I'm arguing for Just chill I get it you know more about the topic but this argument wasn't that complicated :D
2017-04-04 12:16
Tanks have been easy prey for aircraft ever since their appearance in WWI due to their size and very limited mobility. The difference being that back then, the techniques used by aviators to hunt tanks down were fairly inaccurate and dangerous, for example dive bombings. Right now you get a lot of guided weapons which increase the range and the accuracy with which you can destroy tanks. One of the most common tactics if you come across a tank column for instance is to shoot the front and the rear tanks. That way, the rest of them are doomed.
2017-04-04 14:21
#9
 | 
Poland Alexkox 
Poland will be a wall of europe if it happens like #3 said
2017-03-31 17:32
Other's countries army in Poland is usual, don't worry.
2017-03-31 17:35
#12
NEO | 
Poland Trausky 
said whiteflagger
2017-03-31 17:35
+111111111111111
2017-04-01 08:53
cuz they still using horses
2017-03-31 17:37
#15
 | 
Poland Alexkox 
our army is 18th in the world . So wtf are you takling about . And even we can say today that Poland is the strongest nation in the europe if it comes to war . Because your shitty countries need to fight first muslims and immigrants than do something first vs russia ... USA dont give just tank to Poland , because we are first enemy of Russia , just we are the only one which whole country would defend europe not like others on europe ... Usa is not stupid ...
2017-03-31 17:40
Is it for the same reason 3rd Reich and USSR "gave" u tanks?
2017-03-31 17:41
#18
 | 
Poland Alexkox 
I have clearly no idea wtf are you talking about ??? Can you explain me ?
2017-03-31 17:43
U have no idea since the beginning. If u don't get my joke why answer to it in the first place?
2017-03-31 17:45
#25
 | 
Poland Alexkox 
It wasnt a joke for me , man . You need to admit that if it comes to war Europe will be in bad position . Only one which could help europe is it comes to war will be USA . But i dont think so that there will be war in europe in next 10-50 years . Maybe in some shit*ole countries . And it could be that there will be a civil-war or religion war so you never know what will happened
2017-03-31 17:48
U r one of the last country in Europe wondering about a religion war. U will grow up eventually.
2017-03-31 17:57
#33
 | 
Poland Alexkox 
You need to be scared of it a little bit atleast . Im respecting Muslims a lot as a people . I have many friends in Germany like turks or irak people . They are normally people . But i have never saw or met some arab guy beside arab girls . I think the arabs (could be) the most dangerous for our countries and whole Europe beside (Poland and eastern countries) ... We need to stay together strong and not as a single country. If europe or any country from europe wanna be strongest in the world , they will need ofc a whole europe to achieve it or a few countries atleast ... We are small if we compare to other continents , but we are most rising with economical things .
2017-03-31 18:05
U have to understand that for us, Arabs and Poles are pretty much the same. There is French who accept arabs as much as they accept you and French like LePen who want to kick them out, BOTH.
2017-03-31 18:09
#36
 | 
Poland Alexkox 
Yeah , exactly . But if we wanna be friendly and helpful each other . We need to stop fight in europe about the religion . There is only one true god and making battle of how or who god it is . Is making for all of us a sins to the god
2017-03-31 18:12
And this true god is called Allah? Don't ask for respect if u can't respect others urself.
2017-03-31 18:14
#41
 | 
Poland Alexkox 
I would not given my blood for any of the religion if it comes to the war . Im a little bit of atheist and i think more realistic than optimistic as a people do and killing each other for no reason . World wasnt making by a some God , the world has develepoed by step and step . Who do not to agree has really some problem with the head ...
2017-03-31 18:17
god is great
2017-03-31 18:21
omg he just drag you to his level lul
2017-03-31 18:17
you have to understand that white flag is surender
2017-03-31 18:15
U r looking for friend or something?
2017-03-31 18:16
im looking for a baguete frend hi
2017-03-31 18:19
#26
 | 
Poland Alexkox 
sorry for my englando btw .
2017-03-31 17:49
nice white flag jaajjaa
2017-03-31 17:56
surr
2017-03-31 17:44
#22
NEO | 
Poland Trausky 
we had allies: France and UK remeber?
2017-03-31 17:45
Don't fool urself, we, western world, keep our word only if it benefit for us.
2017-03-31 17:59
just like the last time u surr lul
2017-03-31 18:01
At least I didn't give up on my national flag.
2017-03-31 18:02
surr is inevitable for baguette lul
2017-03-31 18:10
retreating back to your island 10/10
2017-03-31 21:49
hitler bomb eu plis
2017-04-01 01:36
#23
 | 
Poland Alexkox 
I know many things about the wars . And wars which could happen and who will fall in these wars .
2017-03-31 17:45
+1
2017-03-31 17:43
but you have a foreign army in your country too? ????
2017-04-03 21:49
?
2017-04-03 21:55
thousands of islamist sleeper agents??
2017-04-03 23:04
Sleeper Army Pick one
2017-04-03 23:09
poland very aggressive again, like in 1939
2017-03-31 17:39
b4d b8 m8
2017-03-31 21:44
why u ie?
2017-03-31 17:41
to keep the russian scum out of EU
2017-03-31 17:43
dont you hate US?
2017-04-01 02:54
not as much as we hate russians
2017-04-01 17:53
Where did you get that from? We hate Russians.
2017-04-03 17:38
Well I meant this guy in particular xD I might of been mixing users up but I think I've seen Alios hating on US regularly
2017-04-05 18:08
#137
FYRR73 | 
Latvia Syecr 
Gypsy calls russians as scum? XD
2017-04-03 12:09
lul latvia aka russia`s biatches, talks about stuff :))))
2017-04-03 17:13
Mongoloid piece of crap labeling a genuine european ethnic as 'gypsy'. Get lost already.
2017-04-03 17:36
#153
FYRR73 | 
Latvia Syecr 
Gypsy could you please return that bike u stole?
2017-04-03 20:23
Mongoloid could you go back to Asia and keep eating raw meat? Subhuman shit.
2017-04-03 21:23
#157
FYRR73 | 
Latvia Syecr 
Mad gypsy XD.
2017-04-03 21:39
Retarded mongoloid.
2017-04-03 21:40
#162
FYRR73 | 
Latvia Syecr 
Mongoloid hahaha. This gypsy is so stupid. The more i talk to you the more stuff gets stolen.
2017-04-03 21:46
Your origins go back to the finno-ugric people which are mongoloids. Fucking subhuman doesn't even know his origins. Also your piece of shit country ranks higher in the crime rate index than Romania.
2017-04-03 21:51
#165
FYRR73 | 
Latvia Syecr 
Yeah we kill gypsies here. They sell low quality cigs at bus/train station. Annoying asf.
2017-04-03 21:55
Mongoloid civilization in a nutshell. It's very likely that a higher percentage of your population is represented by gypsies, than in our case. Mongoloids and gypsies in one place. Can it get any worse? Fucking subhuman trash.
2017-04-03 21:58
#169
FYRR73 | 
Latvia Syecr 
Dirty mad gypsy XD.
2017-04-03 21:59
Yeah get lost already fucking mongoloid trash. Dunno how you even dare to talk shit you inbred scum.
2017-04-03 22:09
retard
2017-03-31 18:19
#45
 | 
Russia Maxul 
I'm so scared.
2017-03-31 18:20
yellow tanks in east europe is the funniest thing i ever heard lmao
2017-03-31 19:21
#51
 | 
Bulgaria BroN 
So poland dont have own army?poland too weak?
2017-03-31 20:03
17th army in The World businessinsider.com/these-are-the-worlds.. 1009 Tanks without US ones
2017-03-31 21:56
said bulgarian xdd
2017-04-01 10:56
#89
 | 
Bulgaria BroN 
? just cuz we dont have army ,means that i cant speak about other armies? yes our army is shit and what?
2017-04-01 11:35
isn't bulgarian army part of Nato ?
2017-04-02 11:40
#119
 | 
Bulgaria BroN 
Yes
2017-04-02 12:16
poland stronk
2017-03-31 21:57
god team america was a fuckin legendary movie lol
2017-04-01 09:03
Poland always ready. Respect
2017-04-01 08:50
#64
 | 
Russia skipster 
lol kek cheburek wat is dis?
2017-04-01 08:54
#68
 | 
Russia Averageruski 
Desert cammo in the snow? very good tactic usa!;)
2017-04-01 09:01
usa needs tips from norway military
2017-04-01 09:15
ez 4 ss-26
2017-04-01 09:20
obviously, States just sold some of outdates vehicles to Poland
2017-04-01 09:27
#76
 | 
United States 420Pizza 
Good luck, we have a wall.
2017-04-01 09:38
just makin dys en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish–Lithuanian_Commonwealth#/media/File:Polish-Lithuanian_Commonwealth_at_its_maximum_extent.svg
2017-04-01 10:24
We don't need tanks. We got an army of officials that will flood the enemy with regulations and taxes
2017-04-01 10:36
US tanks are outdated crap, easy target for Russian ATGM's Kornet E, Metis M etc... German Leopard is da best
2017-04-01 10:42
Yankees go home.
2017-04-01 10:55
#92
Ex6TenZ | 
Finland qBeY 
All these anti-Russia idiots are so full of their delusional thinking they let America do literally anything their countries and then they even pay to the USA for "defense" Un-fucking-believable
2017-04-01 15:09
+1
2017-04-02 09:20
+2
2017-04-02 09:29
Why, I arent think that
2017-04-02 09:34
germanistan revives adolf = 4th reich
2017-04-02 11:28
I wish one day the mighty prussia spirit will return to deutschland
2017-04-02 11:41
not gonna happen m8
2017-04-02 12:24
feelsbadman
2017-04-02 12:53
nope. we found a much better way which doenst cost any noble prussian lifes. we develop and produce the best and a lot of the most important products on the world market. we are not replacable, even Trump will kneel before germanys greatness when murican industry bosses tell him that they can close their plants without huge hightech import from germany. the spirit is there in our elite society, but the human ressources are not (prussia worked well with 4 children/family, but not with 1,4). so we have to do it with brain!
2017-04-03 12:20
#128
 | 
Turkey SLendeRuLeZ 
1:28 the soldier almost falls down
2017-04-02 14:13
#132
 | 
Argentina juanme555RIP 
NO YOU DIDNT!!!!
2017-04-03 09:26
np
2017-04-03 17:25
#160
 | 
United States Snapn 
Largest Military in the world boys.
2017-04-03 21:42
large but shit Vietnam XXXXDDDD
2017-04-03 22:14
#172
 | 
Sweden wyv0 
good, now Putin knows the first place to strike lmao
2017-04-03 22:12
#174
 | 
Turkey LeGentleman 
Trumps fucked fantasy lol they cant attack Russia its just power show !!
2017-04-03 22:17
#177
 | 
United States Snapn 
Yeah Trump is a fucking idiot. But if there is a war, the U.S would throttle the entire EU combined xD
2017-04-03 22:51
#180
 | 
Turkey LeGentleman 
like cold war ? bro us cant attack russia or another country which has nuke bombs
2017-04-03 23:12
#182
 | 
United States Snapn 
It's basically a separate agreement saying those countries wont use their nukes xD. But war (Not Nuclear Warfare) is a different subject.
2017-04-03 23:45
Pls kill u self bitch. One <3 Putin
2017-04-03 23:13
#186
 | 
Brazil m4ri 
someone nuke poland ty
2017-04-05 18:10
14:00R-Stars vs Lynn Vision
R-Stars
1.31
Lynn Vision
3.32
12:30Tricked vs Gambit Youngsters
Tricked
1.42
Gambit Youngsters
2.79
15:30GODSENT vs Illuminar
GODSENT
1.51
Illuminar
2.50
Bet
Return
-
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.