Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Go fuck yourself. - The rest of the world and all future generations
2017-06-01 22:13
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
why medkit so toxic u should help people not hate people
2017-06-01 22:13
60 replies
Can't heal the tumor that your government is.
2017-06-01 22:15
59 replies
) ;
2017-06-01 22:15
23 replies
#61
 | 
Cyprus globalbtw
1. USA bombs middle east. 2. Their homes are destroyed. 3. They come to europe as refugees. 4. F$#k you USA.
2017-06-02 16:10
22 replies
this, USA is the biggest cancer of this world, together with north korea
2017-06-02 16:48
5 replies
he says as he types from a US invention, over a us invention
2017-06-03 06:51
3 replies
Its not an us invention but nt, so tell me why many EU countries specially china has 10 times better internet than USA? If its ur invention why others have better internet than u? Get a life
2017-06-03 11:53
2 replies
you are obviously 12 if you think this is how logic works
2017-06-03 20:11
1 reply
yet you didn't answer and you talk about age, expected from deadbrain
2017-06-03 22:32
+1
2017-06-03 07:14
Not usa's fault you morons took people that hated you
2017-06-02 17:02
1 reply
like you havent took them, lmao
2017-06-02 18:25
Let me tell you a secret Get in a little closer A little more... YOU DON'T HAVE TO LET THEM IN IDIOT
2017-06-02 17:15
11 replies
nt americano
2017-06-02 17:17
#199
 | 
World bright10
sad american bot. that's not a secret, it's called empathy for all the victims of your greed. attack arab nations repeatedly for 30 years because they're your 'enemy' and then laugh at the people it makes homeless. guess what, your retarded war kills off more americans than terrorist groups ever will...and you will never win.
2017-06-02 19:14
9 replies
there would be a lot more military conflicts in the middle east without the USA
2017-06-02 19:45
5 replies
#255
 | 
World bright10
LOL how many more? how's the war on terrorism going? only more groups and individuals with growing animosity towards the west. we don't bring any peace to the region and displace more people than we help
2017-06-02 20:49
4 replies
You clearly have no knowledge of the middle east. Pretty much every country hates each other due to shia sunni divide and Judaism. Iran hate saudi, iran hate isreal, isreal-palastine conflict, etc.
2017-06-02 21:24
3 replies
#283
 | 
World bright10
actually i lived in kuwait for two years and travelled to many others with a rugby club. thanks for trying though. maybe you should go there instead of passing off a complex issue with 'its the shia/sunni divide.' the gulf war didn't begin because of religion and america isn't there still because of religion. move on now ignoramus
2017-06-03 11:08
2 replies
Since you're such an expert on Kuwait you should probably know one of the reasons the gulf war started was because the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait led by the dictator Saddam Hussein. The INTERNATIONAL community then intervened. The gulf war isn't the root of unrest in the middle east, it's been happening for centuries and a lot of it is related to religion
2017-06-03 15:30
1 reply
#298
 | 
World bright10
LOL wow..no shit! Did everyone hear that? Religion causes problems! Who knew! My point is the west has no business being in the Middle East 30 years after the Gulf War. Didn't think I had to spell it out for you. Iraq didn't invade Kuwait because of religious differences and yet America still needs to take military action there. Your point that every Arab country hates every other one shows you have never been there and are entirely ignorant to how peaceful most of the countries are. Get a passport.
2017-06-03 16:08
#231
allu | 
World Zata
pst Russia, England Canada Italy and other countries also sent troops and bombs into the middle east. so no hate for them just US.... biased?
2017-06-02 19:46
1 reply
#257
 | 
World bright10
all american led attacks. allied obligations. nothing more. no hate at all. just judgment.
2017-06-02 20:51
^ this so much
2017-06-03 15:37
Correct... just bomb usa.... they deserve it..
2017-06-02 19:34
agreed.
2017-06-02 20:30
1 reply
There should be "My nigga"
2017-06-02 17:22
#18
 | 
United States kdpetr0
Listen here you European Scum Emperor Trump™ will save us. Emperor Trump™ will throw those filthy illegals over Trump Wall™ and deny any explody mud skins from blowing up our towns, and send them back to their goatfucker caves Learn your place, and praise Emperor Trump™
2017-06-01 22:29
31 replies
0/10
2017-06-01 22:50
27 replies
hey medpack, switzerland is not in the agreement... :D:D:D xaxaxaxaxa get some fucking education you dumb uneducated communist kid.
2017-06-02 10:21
26 replies
Of course we have signed the agreement. Are you retarded? Basler Chlyklass?
2017-06-02 15:38
23 replies
no you haven't xaxaxaxaxa the only thing you have is on national level but till end of 2017 there is no plans to enter the paris agreement. you can also check it yourself on the official site as you're not informed at all about your politics, dumb zürcher kreis 4 junky.
2017-06-02 15:39
21 replies
We have signed it, but haven't ratified it yet (which is just a technical process). Maybe it's time that YOU educate yourself. uvek.admin.ch/uvek/de/home/uvek/bundespr.. We're btw. already far ahead in most points and the new "energy strategy" that the people have just voted YES on goes far beyond of what the Paris agreement demands. Not to mention that our ecological fingerprint is already absolute top league with a very low level of carbon emission (our energy is already mostly based on renewable energy sources, especially water power, no fossile sources at all, and the current goal is to replace nuclear energy with renewables, making our energy production fully based on renewable energy sources).
2017-06-02 15:51
20 replies
can you read #44 again carefully? :D or should i write it in schwizerdütsch as you seem to not understand it :D
2017-06-02 15:51
19 replies
Which is absolute nonsense. We already HAVE signed the agreement, it's just not ratified yet. The USA just bailed out completely, the only countries that are not part of the agreement are now the USA, Syria and Nicaragua (and Nicaragua only out of protest because the agreement wasn't strict enough in their opinion). And of course you dodged my main point: We already meet most standards and our carbon emission per capita rate is absolutely nothing compared to the USA's. I should stop talking with fucking autists like you... Go back to your Basler Chlyklass.
2017-06-02 15:58
18 replies
again you're completely wrong :D start here to know how many countries exist hltv.org/forums/threads/1491170/usa-haha.. switzerland is not part, like many other countries, but continue posting facebook propaganda. also it's parties, not countries. but as you have no fucking clue about politics you seem to not know. a party is not the same as a country. get some fucking education communist kid.
2017-06-02 16:02
17 replies
I just linked you the official website of our government where they declare that they have signed the agreement, yet you keep talking nonsense. It's pointless to argue with mongols like you.
2017-06-02 16:19
16 replies
so? angola, bhutan and many more parties too... however they've not entered the paris agreement. the next steps would be: Ratification Acceptance (A) Approval (AA) and after several months: Entry into Force
2017-06-02 16:22
15 replies
Listen you fake-flagging retard living In Basel as an immigrant (yet hating on immigration): You claimed that Switzerland never signed the agreement and thus is now in the same position as the USA, which is WRONG as I just proved to you. The whole ratification process is another story: It always takes two sides to ratify something and decide over things like the required controlling institutions. While all the single EU countries ratified the agreement via an EU commission, speaking for all of them, Switzerland was left out (since it's not part of the EU) and it shouldn't come to a surprise that the absolute biggest polluters (compared to whose emissions Switzerland's emission are almost non-existent) had priority over a small country that already fulfills most of the demands in the agreement. But yes, I hope we will soon fully ratify it, even if that won't have much impact on the actual reality, it would be - as your utterly retarded comments perfectly prove - important to give retards like you who dislike the agreement less poor excuses.
2017-06-02 16:37
14 replies
where exactly did i say "claimed that Switzerland never signed the agreement" if you for once would read carefully you would read things like "switzerland is not in the agreement" or "but till end of 2017 there is no plans to enter the paris agreement" :D:D:D hahahahhaa so fucking uneducated piece of shit :D oh i know who you're :D the dumb zürcher who still thinks that parades can be made by anyone without a fucking reason :D xaxaxaxaxa
2017-06-02 16:40
10 replies
"hey medpack, switzerland is not in the agreement... :D:D:D xaxaxaxax" "no you haven't xaxaxaxaxa" Here. You fucking mong compared Switzerland to the USA, the USA left the agreement completely, while Switzerland signed it and never pulled out. We ARE in the agreement, we SIGNED the agreement, we just haven't fully ratified it yet. Of course parades can be made, this is a free country. If you don't like it, go back to wherever you came from.
2017-06-02 16:55
9 replies
which is factually correct until "Entry into Force" i also did not compare in any post medpack country with the states :D another big lie :D
2017-06-02 16:50
1 reply
No, it's wrong. Adolf_Fritzl: " switzerland is not in the agreement" You_w0t_moite: "Of course we have signed the agreement." Adolf_Fritzl: "no you haven't xaxaxaxaxa" ...... Adolf_Fritzl: "where exactly did i say "claimed that Switzerland never signed the agreement" Really? You acted like the USA is now in the same position as Switzerland.
2017-06-02 23:18
no wonder you're such a kreis 4 junky :D knowing nothing about politics at all :D had to change his name "RESPECT_MY_AUTHORITY" after getting bullied cuz i showed in many posts how you're posting propaganda :D:D:D
2017-06-02 16:52
6 replies
Bitch, please...
2017-06-02 17:03
5 replies
oh nice using different accounts :D still both yours as you have just shown.
2017-06-02 17:20
4 replies
Are all Swiss people this angry?
2017-06-02 19:12
2 replies
nah... just those that live in zürich... almost everyone from switzerland hates them... and they still think that they're somehow special.
2017-06-02 19:14
No just this guy is a maniac
2017-06-02 23:33
#292
 | 
Sweden crindz
always trying to be so edgy, but you fail every fucking time. go read a book, kid.
2017-06-03 14:32
you are argueing here with the famous hltv autist "Adolf_fritzl" who is a russian piece of trash living in switzerland propagating bullshit on this site 24/7 and you expect decency.
2017-06-02 16:46
2 replies
#201
 | 
World bright10
lol +1 i'm going to copy your comment as it is the perfect summary.
2017-06-02 19:16
stop expose them
2017-06-02 23:34
USA LOGIC Hater of the USA = COMMUNIST LOOOOOOL
2017-06-03 07:19
#52
 | 
United Kingdom MFDOOM
This is what a trump supporter types like with their 50iq
2017-06-02 15:58
1 reply
alteast luxembourg is in the agreement... you should bash on this medpack.
2017-06-02 16:23
yes i'll do it
2017-06-02 03:40
1 reply
LOL, your name.
2017-06-02 06:03
9/11. I like the spirit. You sometimes need to be a cruel-cold blood asshole to do the right thing. Make American great again, and then I will try to be an immigrant. :D
2017-06-02 06:04
+1
2017-06-03 07:15
ez report
2017-06-01 22:15
The US joins Syria and Nicaragua as the only countries to not be in the Paris Accords. US is literally a rogue nation now.
2017-06-01 22:15
4 replies
when ur on a list with syria and nicaragua u know somethings wrong
2017-06-01 22:18
1 reply
#29
 | 
Argentina CrayZ
True. lol
2017-06-01 23:41
#90
 | 
Sweden mixlax
Actually Nicaragua is not in because the they didnt think it was enough... So it is USA and Syria...
2017-06-02 16:50
1 reply
and Syria aren't in because they have a war
2017-06-02 17:19
not all USA , just the clown and retards who support him , but yes i agree . FUCK YOU !
2017-06-01 22:15
19 replies
yeah when obama does something bad it's okay he's a liberal he gets the nobel prize of peace yahhh
2017-06-01 22:20
18 replies
stfu kid and go to school or read a book in your life.
2017-06-01 22:31
17 replies
xDDD i wonder where all y'all faggots were when obawma quadrupled his forces in afganistan
2017-06-01 22:46
15 replies
do you see anyone here talking about how good is obama ? why do you feel the need to bring this dead post fact as an argument to trump IN THE PRESENT beeing an absolute piece of shit ? and btw comparing the two of them , obama is at least 5 times better regarding everything so far.
2017-06-01 23:34
14 replies
"regarding everything so far" like what? name ONE thing, just ONE thing that obama has done for the US that has had a positive effect. impossible.
2017-06-02 16:04
13 replies
social healthcare. external view about the world. not trying to influence the rule of law.
2017-06-02 16:06
12 replies
shitty, expensive healthcare? yeah, look at how great that turned out... wtf does external view about the world mean? lol? not trying to influence the rule of law? obama was by far the LEAST law abiding president we've had to date: maga1776.com/high%20rez.png your points are invalid.........
2017-06-02 16:13
11 replies
of course my point are 'invalid' i could've anticipated this by the way you first time replied to me.
2017-06-02 16:14
10 replies
i just proved why all your points were invalid. obama was the MOST scandalous president of all time, his administration created shitty healthcare for everyone that (for some reason) people think is good, and idk wtf 'external view of the world' means lol
2017-06-02 16:17
9 replies
you didnt prove shit , you just gave me your biased irrelevant opinion.
2017-06-02 16:21
8 replies
maga1776.com/high%20rez.png zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-22/predicted-.. or you could just blatantly ignore my comments. ignorance :D
2017-06-02 16:22
7 replies
is this your proof ? some random biased picture and a biased opinion of a random guy on a blog ? no wonder why a guy like trump is president in usa.
2017-06-02 16:25
6 replies
because we elected him xD random biased picture? everything is verifiable lol now i know ur just trolling
2017-06-02 16:30
5 replies
it might be kid , but it doesnt mean its an objetctive comparison. nonetheless. but why do i even reply to a guy like you.
2017-06-02 16:33
4 replies
wut? u gave the idiotic response of "social healthcare. external view about the world. not trying to influence the rule of law." as something positive obama has done. obamacare has been more of a detriment to middle class americans and has benefitted almost nobody. still dont know wtf external view of the world means... and i dont recall an instance of trump trying to influence the rule of law. i do remember MULTIPLE instances of obama blatantly breaking the law.
2017-06-02 16:40
3 replies
'still dont know wtf external view of the world means' expected from autistic american. 'and i dont recall an instance of trump trying to influence the rule of law' he fucking dissmissed the chief of fbi few weeks ago because he was investigating him . i mean what more do you need.
2017-06-02 16:42
2 replies
then you clearly haven't read an unbiased piece of info regarding what happened. he only accused trump of coming to him to dismiss the investigation AFTER he was let go. it was also after he testified IN COURT UNDER OATH that the president has never come to him to intervene in an investigation. if you don't clearly see that comey either comey is lying or he committed perjury then you're clearly the idiot.
2017-06-02 16:54
1 reply
are you fucking retarded ? what do you mean 'the president has never come to him to intervene in an investigation' ? whats wrong with an investigation in the first place ? if you're innocent just let it go , and if its proven you're guilty in the end even better for the country. even if comey was lying why would you close the investigation uni-lateral like he did if you dont have anything to hide. but you have to be an absolute moron like you not to recognize what happened there and to deny the main subject with post truth bullshit.
2017-06-02 17:00
Still proving my point I see
2017-06-02 16:33
#7
 | 
Finland RamboAAA
Another guy who can't listen/read ;( Trump said that he will make a new deal..I don't see the problem?
2017-06-01 22:16
4 replies
Only reason to cancel the agreement is because he doesn't want the limitations set in the agreement, and without these limitations any new agreement will be pointless. The "new deal" talk is just PR bullshit to save at least a tiny bit of the USA's reputation, because by just leaving without an "outlook on a new deal" he would look even worse in the eyes of the rest of the world (it would be equal to "fuck the environment, we don't care"). The whole world has FINALLY agreed on a common agreement, but this shitlord had to ruin it (at least all other nations have confirmed that they will not leave the agreement just because the US is a piece of shit, which makes me really proud of the world; as a result the USA should just get sanctioned by the rest of the world so not respecting the international standards will never ever give them any economical advantages and they will look like fucking morons). Even his daughter thinks this was a terrible decision.
2017-06-01 22:33
2 replies
+1 i like you
2017-06-02 17:56
europeans are thinking about putting extra taxes on american products because of "Wettbewerbsverzerrung" since us companys don't have to follow the same rules as european companys
2017-06-02 19:00
When Scott Pruitt (head of EPA) was asked what changes would have to be made to the deal for US to reenter it, he couldn't point to ANYTHING specific that would have to be changed and completely dodged. It's so fucking obvious. He doesn't plan to reenter and his administration can't even point to specifics of the deal that would have to be changed. He's just blatantly lying once again. How are people still getting conned by the most obvious conman in the history?
2017-06-02 17:08
#8
 | 
United States grundhoog
Fuck the government.
2017-06-01 22:17
1 reply
kill the yanks pls pussy
2017-06-01 22:20
death the america:)))
2017-06-01 22:19
Even North Korea signed it lol
2017-06-01 22:22
gogogo usa : ) ) ) ) after trump it will be Ivanka for 1st female US president. Get fucked Clintons & Obongo gayzz =DDDDDDDDDD
2017-06-01 22:28
10 replies
after his SECOND term ;) 12 years of Trump!!! #MAGA
2017-06-02 16:14
9 replies
16*
2017-06-02 18:25
8 replies
you're right, Ivanka is totally in for two terns. Maybe Barron will want to run in about 30 ish years
2017-06-02 18:27
7 replies
8 trump 8 ivanka 8 eric 8 Donald JR 8 Barron 40 years of #maga lets go
2017-06-02 18:28
6 replies
you need to be 35 right? I think he's 11 y/o rn so i believe someone else would have to run following Don Jr, THEN barron... but who?
2017-06-02 18:30
5 replies
By the time don jr is done with his presidency, barron is 43 #maga
2017-06-02 18:33
4 replies
^ cancers of humanity ^ you deserve to live in caves for 20 years by your own to learn not to take everything for granted and then 20 years in north korea to understand how its like to be leaded by a dictator for generations and what is freedom , you fucking scums of humanity.
2017-06-02 19:43
2 replies
#224 :) And yes, that was a joke. I don't particularly like Trump, and i dont agree with him on many things, but i do however believe he was/is a better candidate than Hillary. Bernie >
2017-06-02 19:44
trump? dictator? lol :D now i know not to take anything you say seriously
2017-06-02 21:30
rip i cant do maths :D
2017-06-02 21:29
try to invade us and see what happens ;) USA finally using its power and influence to benefit US citizens.
2017-06-01 22:27
10 replies
ignorance lvl 999 i bet you are that kind of guy who thinks the sun is revolving around the earth because thats what you see everyday. people like you will destroy the world some day.
2017-06-01 22:39
you don't have much exp with defensive wars do ya sonny boyo))))
2017-06-01 22:52
7 replies
i know belgium fell in 2 weeks in ww2
2017-06-02 03:25
4 replies
LULULULULUL
2017-06-02 16:14
1 reply
why u hef to be
2017-06-02 17:30
LUL
2017-06-02 17:25
1 reply
mad
2017-06-02 17:30
To be fair, the US pretty much lost every war they set out to start anyway since WWII. Korea was (still is) considered a stalemate, Vietnam a big fat loss. Iraq and Afghanistan is far from wins. The successful ones being bullying really really reaaaaally tiny central american countries.
2017-06-02 16:50
1 reply
Iraq and Afghanistan is far from win? Tell me then how win should looks like in these countries
2017-06-02 23:48
#28
 | 
Argentina CrayZ
Kys
2017-06-01 23:39
#19
 | 
Brazil fuNNa
ez report medkit
2017-06-01 22:29
+9999999999
2017-06-01 22:32
lol in 5 years no healthcare more debt massive army spending no allies tax cuts for the rich im actually thrilled what could go wrong?
2017-06-01 22:51
3 replies
Nice b8...w8...Omg...you actually believe this? Lol you're not joking...rip
2017-06-02 05:44
2 replies
stay deluded
2017-06-02 08:34
you asking someone if they believe something when you believe whatever your president says, get some brains. from all these cuts people should pay far less taxes, but no, he cuts lots of things but still people will pay the same taxes, so you as a citizen are getting pure shit
2017-06-02 16:55
+1
2017-06-01 23:43
Jonathan I am offended that this European is talking trash about #1 country in the world. They wouldn't even have computers without USA inventing it. ban pls
2017-06-02 03:30
8 replies
USA didn't invented shit smartass, an American guy created it, but not USA, a citizen and a whole country is completely different, and now you are not #1 country, maybe in your dreams. you are only #1 country in bombing others and then say ohh we bombed them so they can't bomb us -.- delusional
2017-06-02 16:58
7 replies
They can bomb whatever they want because they are the strongests aka # 1, wake up pls.
2017-06-02 23:51
6 replies
It doesn't work like that, you cant just go and bomb whatever you want. But what they do is creating 9-11 and then say ok you bombed us now we can enter ur country and fuck it up
2017-06-03 00:41
5 replies
Ofc it does work like that, they are the imperium and if you wanna keep your imperium alive you need to steal and invade weaker countries. This is how world works like, check the past and every imperium on the planet, they were killing for own profit as well, this is our human nature and you can't change that. They had to plan 9-11 or let it happen so USA people could build hate around "muslim terrorists" because you know your government cant tell you truth that we gonna invade middle-east countries just for profit without reason. So they have fully right to do what they want, they are #1 and deal with it.
2017-06-03 04:19
4 replies
Expected from fakeflagge speaking to third person ahahah they are #1 of shithole and deal with it
2017-06-03 11:49
3 replies
Why you mad? just accept how world looks like, we're barbarians. USA #1 NUMBA WAN okey? :>
2017-06-03 13:35
2 replies
well if the world works like that in your eyes then that's with you, but just stop fakeflagging
2017-06-03 14:21
1 reply
Why i've to fake flagging? im polish cucumber lol
2017-06-03 14:41
But Dolan Trump wants his coal mines. They are very important to him. Also climate change is a chinese plot.
2017-06-02 05:54
#38
 | 
United States NA_CS_FAN
sorry don't need a medpack right now thanks
2017-06-02 06:05
#40
 | 
Finland Waari
At this point just strap in and watch it all burn down. Don't reproduce, you do not want your kids to die in the future battle of resources.
2017-06-02 08:47
sasa
2017-06-02 10:04
China and India are the greatest polluter in the earth and you want usa to folk out the most money? why dont you ask india and china to do their part first?
2017-06-02 10:12
25 replies
cuz these kind of creatures never use logic and just post the propaganda from cnn & soros friends media. for example cnn just listed 3 countries which are not participating in the paris agreement, which is completely fucking wrong. every educated person can check it themself at the official site: unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9444.ph.. that's how propaganda works and sadly there are many many many many many many stupid people that never do their own fucking research and just trust in the propaganda.
2017-06-02 10:18
18 replies
#49
 | 
Japan jia
+1 ty Alex Jones
2017-06-02 15:55
What exactly is false about CNN's reporting on this matter? 194 countries have signed on to Paris climate agreement. Only USA, Syria and Nicaragua haven't signed the deal. You literally linked the document yourself. Do you have brains? Just another brainwashed conspiracy theorist. Do they put chemicals in the water to make the frogs gay? Was Sandy Hook a hoax setup by Obama to take guns away? What happened? Does Obama smell like sulfur and is he literally the devil?
2017-06-02 17:17
16 replies
first of all, how many countries are there? as you seem to be so fucking uneducated, it's parties, not countries on the official site. that's a big difference. as you have no fucking clue you seem to not understand it. "do you have brains" says the guy who doesn't know the difference between "Signature" and "Entry into Force"... once again it's a fucking big difference. try again uneducated communist kid.
2017-06-02 17:29
15 replies
> first of all, how many countries are there? Depends what you recognize as a country. It's somewhere around 195 but UN allowed Palestine and Cook Islands sign this agreement even though they're not recognized as independent countries. > it's parties, not countries on the official site. Parties are those countries that are actively enforcing the deal already. Signatories are those who support the deal and are going to start enforcing the deal in the future and USA is now one of 3 countries that haven't even signed on to it anymore. These countries are STILL CONSIDERED AS PART OF THE DEAL, LIKE IT OR NOT. > "Signature" and "Entry into Force" That's a massive strawman. CNN didn't claim that "US is now one of 3 other countries that aren't enforcing the deal" as you seem to claim. CNN's claim about US being 1 of 3 other countries that aren't in the deal is FACTUALLY CORRECT, like it or not brainwashed moron. You should probably turn off Alex Jones for a while. What happened to Pizzagate? Exactly. youtube.com/watch?v=LgE2rbrqQoI What happened to Chobani? Exactly. youtube.com/watch?v=Hm_Gm1_a9bU
2017-06-02 18:20
14 replies
there are many more that aren't countries but you called them "countries". no, all of them are parties and not considered as country. CNN claimed that 194 countries are in, which is factually wrong, even yourself posted 2 that aren't actually countries (small hint: there are more). and you still claim that i am factually wrong :D:D:D pls kid... :D
2017-06-02 18:26
13 replies
All countries that have signed the agreement and thus are part of it are either green, orange or dark orange on this map. The countries that aren't part of the agreement are grey. upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4.. Of course now the USA would also be grey.
2017-06-02 19:22
9 replies
signing something doesn't imply that their status is has surpassed "Entry into Force". it's like saying brexit already happened and uk isn't part of the eu anymore. but can't expect much logic from a communist zürcher kreis 4 junky like you. or even a better example: i buy a flight ticket with your logic as soon as i bought it (signed the contract ;)) i already have reached the destination.
2017-06-02 19:30
8 replies
You're without a doubt the dumbest person on this whole website. I and R7PTOR explained you multiple times that this differentiation is irrelevant for the point you're trying to make since the US is NEITHER of them, it LEFT the agreement. It's hilarious how you're trying to make fun of an article you quite obviously didn't even understand. "it's like saying brexit already happened and uk isn't part of the eu anymore." This comparison is complete non-sense since the determining factor in your Brexit example is time, which was never even part of our discussion about the Paris climate agreement. Are you really that desperate?
2017-06-02 19:34
7 replies
it's not irrelevant lul :D if "time" isn't part of the discussion why hasn't switzerland achieved the status of "Entry into Force" whilst many others have?!? :D:D like wtf :D keep trying :D
2017-06-02 19:40
6 replies
We were speaking about the USA you fucking retard, and after you got proven wrong you came up with the dumbest comparison ever "it's like saying brexit already happened and uk isn't part of the eu anymore." in which time is the defining factor and thus it's a completely retarded comparison as the USA canceling their participation in the Paris climate agreement has NOTHING to do with time and we also never debated whether the USA is still part of the agreement right now or not (that was not even part of the debate). You fucking shitlord claimed that some article was lying when it stated that everyone except for Nicaragua and Syria are part of the agreement, multiple people have multiple times explained to you why you're wrong, and when you run out of arguments you just came up with a total retarded "comparison" that doesn't even work. Good job.
2017-06-02 20:44
5 replies
unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9444.ph.. actual status of switzerland? Signature = Entry into Force? xaxaxaxaxa keep trying :D my example of the plane ticket describes pretty good your stupid logic... but once again you can't understand it as you always use double standards... goodbye communist kreis 4 junky. keep posting cnn propaganda and saying that it's countries instead of parties :D:D:D you will keep looking like a total idiot that has no fucking clue about politics.
2017-06-02 20:50
4 replies
I and other people already explained to you 1 million times that Switzerland hasn't ratified the agreement yet, but is PART of the agreement as it has SIGNED the agreement, which the USA is NOT anymore. How hard is this to understand? And the article you accused of lying wasn't saying anything different from that, thus the article is correct. Do I need to explain this to you in Russian or whatever mother tongue you're speaking (how the fuck did they even let you into Switzerland)? I didn't even read any "plane ticket" example and I also couldn't be less interested in having a "discussion" with you as you seem to be completely lacking any kind of logical comprehension.
2017-06-02 20:59
3 replies
oh as i forgot to mention it before, yes, the cnn article and all the others that use the same propaganda writes about countries, lists for example EU as a country, niue and many other that aren't actual countries as they don't know the difference between parties and countries. so factually you're again wrong defending cnn and their propaganda. goodbye.
2017-06-02 21:03
2 replies
These are all countries (parties, unions or whatever the fuck you want to call them) that have signed the agreement, the ones that are not part of the agreement are grey (of course the USA would be grey now): upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4.. "OH MY GAWD CNN IS TOTALLY EXAGGERATING THE NUMBER OF COUNTRIES THAT ARE PART OF THE AGREEMENT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
2017-06-02 21:21
1 reply
Dude it's fucking pointless. He's obviously so desperate to claim ANY facts that do not support his narrative are "fake news". Just another completely brainwashed Alex Jones victim that lacks the ability to think with his own brain.
2017-06-02 23:19
> CNN claimed that 194 countries are in, which is factually wrong, even yourself posted 2 that aren't actually countries This is some of the most desperate shit ever seen. Because UN allowed Palestine and Cook Islands to sign this agreement as independent bodies/countries, therefor CNN is now somehow lying by referring to these 2 areas as countries among those 192 other countries? Holy fuck you're so fucking sad it's unreal. Remember what you originally said? "cnn just listed 3 countries which are not participating in the paris agreement, which is completely fucking wrong." ONLY COUNTRIES, WHICH HAVEN'T SIGNED ON TO THE DEAL ARE USA, SYRIA AND NICARAGUA, LIKE IT OR NOT. Btw, Nicaragua didn't sign it because they thought the deal wasn't going far enough. Get the fuck out of here #ALTERNATIVEFACTS special frail snowflake.
2017-06-02 23:15
2 replies
mistake is a mistake, and there are many more that aren't actual countries because it's actually parties, not countries. if your education is that low, it is actually your problem and you're pretty ridiculous defending such an obvious mistake. having signed doesn't make them participate until their status is officially fulfilled. like it or not, but it's actually such a bad try to defend propaganda, wow, a zombie propagandist tells me to get the fuck out when he knows actually nothing, says parties are actually countries (lul) and says having signed but not fulfilled the process is the same as having fulfilled it... try again... or better, don't even try it again as you're such a bad troll trying to defend such obvious propaganda... oh and btw. yours are alternative facts... i'm not the guy that is doing these kind of things.
2017-06-03 10:59
1 reply
> there are many more that aren't actual countries because it's actually parties, not countries. Yeah there's total of 190 countries, and 4 disputed areas that have signed the agreement that were treated as independent countries when it came to this agreement. Remember what your original argument was? You said it was wrong for CNN to point out that USA, Syria and Nicaragua are the only countries not in the deal. WHICH PART OF THAT CLAIM IS WRONG? You will dodge the question, i know it in advance as you're a frail #ALTERNATIVEFACTS snow flake. > having signed doesn't make them participate Holy fuck you're braindead. You're officially in the deal if you have signed it, like it or not. This is the standard for every UN deal, not just Paris climate accord. I can't believe someone is this desperate to call anything fake news. You have to be majorly brainwashed.
2017-06-03 15:29
Isn't India going massive in solar energy?
2017-06-02 15:58
1 reply
They are indeed. They are doing huge amount of research on it and putting in a heavy investment because they realized their environmental policies was all shit.
2017-06-02 16:53
China and India are countries that just went respectively are still going through enormous economic development, their whole industrialization process only started a few decades ago (while we had an entire century, giving no fucks about pollution while going through this process). Yes, they are main polluters, but they already show greater responsibilities than the USA, which is a fucking shame. The USA's per head carbon emission is FAR greater than the one of China or India (since these countries have 4-5 times the population and a far lower consumption), and while underdevelopment and poverty is still a big weight on the shoulders of China and India that limits their options, the USA has absolutely no excuse. It has the technologies, the industrial potential and the wealth to go through this process, but refuses to out of pure greed, ignorance and laziness. This Indian woman brings it on point (the whole documentary is btw. worth watching): youtu.be/KpWlzFJw3v8?t=35m4s Nobody in China would ever deny that global warming is real and environment politics have become a very dominant topic in Chinese politics and their society (I guess when you got such polluted cities there's not way to hide it anymore), while in the USA most people don't even seem to give the slightest fuck and they have even voted for a president that does not only not understand the issue but even calls it a hoax.
2017-06-02 16:16
2 replies
Just saying, 10 countries are worse than the US. data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E..
2017-06-02 20:36
1 reply
Yes, so? A handful of small oil industry driven countries with a total pollution of not even one US state have a higher per capita carbon emission than the USA, I'm outraged, let's cancel now all reasonable climate agreements.
2017-06-02 20:49
If you look at the numbers, the US is second behind China as the biggest CDE nations. India is third, but already taking on a huge undertaking and investment into clean solar energy because they see the problem. The US on the other hand does everything they can to reopen cheap dirty energy options like coalmines and so on. Not only destroying the earth and nature where the coal is, but polluting the air like mad aswell. If anyone of you have seen a stripmine for coal you'll know what I'm talking about in destroying everything in it's vicinity.
2017-06-02 16:57
dear You_w0t_moite climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax climate change is a hoax
2017-06-02 16:24
The agreement was puting certain limitations on our economy why would we stay with a deal that is not in our best interest
2017-06-02 16:34
74 replies
It's putting "limitations" on EVERYONE's economy, a climate agreement without such limitations would be COMPLETELY USELESS. And if you're smart and innovative these "limitations" can also become new opportunities and chances for your economy (but of course if you rather want to stagnate...). Even the freaking Chinese have realized that (they now have somehow managed to overcome most of the world in terms of being innovative and leading the new technologies movement).
2017-06-02 16:53
73 replies
Americans want jobs which this agreement took away millions. We care about this more than only slightly helping the envirment. Plus it limited our economy way more than any one esles
2017-06-02 16:57
72 replies
Uneducated americans going at it again "Give us our coalmines back!!!". gg, go back to school.
2017-06-02 16:59
15 replies
I'm right and it's more just the factory jobs
2017-06-02 17:01
14 replies
No, you're not right. You're thinking short-term. Longterm those jobs are gonna disappear anyway. So instead of finding a sustainable solution you're happy destroying so much for a few years worth of jobs for uneducated people. Meanwhile, you just destroyed more parts of your nation that is never going to be able to be repaired. Ever seen a stripmine? What do you think makes the factories go around?
2017-06-02 17:03
13 replies
How exactly are those jobs going to disappear? long term pulling out of the agreement hardly even helps the envirment
2017-06-02 17:05
12 replies
Menial labor jobs. Factories are replacing everyone they can already with advanced technology where it is possible. Industrial robots. These are going to improve more and more. They are already replacing so many workers worldwide (not meaning in subpar economical countries where they have childlabor for 1$ a week) and have been doing so at a steady rate over the past 20 years. Let's say as an exercise you get 10000 jobs out of this right now. How many do you think is gonna be around in 10 years? If you're lucky, 2k. That's being lucky. I'd be guessing it's more around the 1k mark because those jobs would be more expensive to have the robots do. Your last sentence makes zero sense. Do you mean staying in the agreement you don't think it's going to help longterm? If so, really please, go back to school man and educate yourself or you'll be stuck without a job when they don't need you on the factoryfloor anymore.
2017-06-02 17:11
11 replies
This guy knows what's up.
2017-06-02 17:14
We are going to get a couple of million jobs from this yes they will decrease eventually but not for at least 20 years.
2017-06-02 17:25
9 replies
Wow you are dense. The 10k wasn't an estimate, it was a number set as an exercise to do the math on what you'll be left with to show you how stupid this shit is. But clearly, you can't even have the comprehension level to understand that simple thing. So have fun with your unemployment in a few years.
2017-06-02 17:27
1 reply
I understood that dude I was just saying it was good for our economy for the next 20 years. If I thought 10000 was an estimate I would have direct called u out for it and said that wasn't even close to The actuall amount
2017-06-02 17:29
God you trigger me so much. LOOK AT IT IN THE BROAD PERSPECTIVE. These CO2 restrictions are a limitation to all economies (short term). Typical self centered burgers unable to see the big pictures. Everybody is making a sacrifice (economically) in the process of saving the earth. Except you now.
2017-06-02 18:40
6 replies
I've already said some where that it is limiting our economy way more then other countries
2017-06-02 18:42
5 replies
Yes, because your industry has been ruining our planet for decades - maybe this is the time for a change huh?
2017-06-02 18:44
4 replies
No it's not
2017-06-02 19:05
this guy its typical fat american teenager with double digits iq , dont even try to be reasonable with him. you will regret it in the end beeing nice and trying to explain things.
2017-06-02 19:36
2 replies
the dude is a complete retard but he really isn't the typical american teenager at all lol
2017-06-03 14:14
1 reply
not in california or new york but on average , unfortunatelly he is.
2017-06-03 15:21
No, this is exactly "only slightly helping the economy" what you're doing now. You're missing out on a huge opportunity for your economy and you're screwing over the entire planet, with effects many future generations will suffer from. And no it doesn't. What really screws your economy over is your lack of innovation and the will for progress and change, and by holding on to something that doesn't have any future anyways and thus missing out on huge opportunities you're harming your economy MUCH more in the long run. But I guess it's all about the quick money and stupid political games.
2017-06-02 17:02
55 replies
It's was supposed to say only slightly help the envirement in changed it now it massively helps the economy
2017-06-02 17:03
32 replies
you're so stupid and autistic . the perfect victim of populism.
2017-06-02 17:11
31 replies
Just keep proving my point of u autism
2017-06-02 17:16
30 replies
you're a joke.
2017-06-02 17:16
29 replies
Just like ur argument
2017-06-02 17:18
28 replies
i already told you im not argueing with you , just insulting.
2017-06-02 17:18
27 replies
Yeah but every1 u argue with u just insult so it's hard to tell the difference
2017-06-02 17:23
26 replies
its hard for you because you're narrow minded idiot.
2017-06-02 17:24
25 replies
Says u who insults every1 they disagree with and doesn't actually know shit
2017-06-02 17:27
24 replies
i insult idiots . not somebody who has something reasonable to say . you one of the idiots. get over it.
2017-06-02 17:27
23 replies
Yeah but ur definition of reasonable is people who agree with u and it doesn't change the fact u don't know shit on the subjects u insult people on
2017-06-02 17:30
22 replies
you are exactly that person you describe me as regarding topics you dont know shit about. you are literally an idiot teenager with the general knowledge that i had when i was 12 trying to act like a man .
2017-06-02 17:34
21 replies
Thing is u have not showed that u have any knowledge and I have a lot of knowledge about American politics ur the 1 Who desnt have a clue
2017-06-02 17:45
20 replies
lol you're a fucking idiot. but its worthless with you . stay delusional.
2017-06-02 18:07
19 replies
Same to u
2017-06-02 18:07
u dont argue, you just insult l m a o you pretty much insta-lose every argument buddy
2017-06-02 18:31
17 replies
insta-lose ? check all the my other conversations with idiots , this guy above is literally an 80iq american teenager with autism, he doesnt deserve arguments , only insults. and you are a cancer person aswell , i've seen your comments all around beeing a racist and unreasonable idiot in every matter.
2017-06-02 19:30
16 replies
At least i dont resort to personal attacks to prove my point :) gl with that attitude, shows the real "progressive" and "tolerant" left
2017-06-02 19:30
15 replies
i dont have any point to prove other than reminding him over and over again what a fucking autist he is. and as expected you strtike with 80 iq stereotypes . im not a leftist im just tough with retards like you and the guy above because you dont deserve to be treated normally . whenever a piece of shit like you open his mouth trying to say some bullshit ill be there to bash you with straight insults because thats what you deserve.
2017-06-02 19:32
14 replies
Ever heard of Ad hominem? Educate yourself instead of telling others to. 127 iq from the most reputable IQ test in Norway (mensa.no) You call me a retard, yet you have spaces before the "."s, this is fucking autistic and looks retarded. "whenever a piece of shit like you open his mouth trying to say some bullshit ill be there to bash you with straight insults because thats what you deserve." Damn, yeah you seem like a calm, collected and intelligent fella. Shouting insults at people only make you look like the dumbo you really are. "Insults are the arguments employed by those who are in the wrong." -Jean-Jacques Rousseau I guess Rousseau also was a fucking retard dumb fuck cunt inbred piece of shit retard autist aswell then? Sorry bro, but using insults instead of ACTUALLY arguing makes you look like an idiot as well as insta-losing the argument for you. Take this advice, reconsider your life maybe get a hobby or something. At the very least quit insulting people and start to help them understand by being a reasonable logical human being.
2017-06-02 19:45
13 replies
oh stfu you fucking cancer. dont ever try to teach me anything you racist piece of shit.
2017-06-02 19:43
12 replies
At least i tried :)
2017-06-02 19:45
11 replies
you tell me that insulting its not okay while you said 30 minutes ago "muslims arent human" fucking CANCER also ad-hominem ( a term you heard about it on internet ) its not what i did because it implies an argue and as i said im not argueing with idiots and cancer people . just straight insults. if you dont like go cry in your pillow.
2017-06-02 19:49
10 replies
Again, a joke. Its called satire. Even if it wasn't, i never said i dont insult people, i merely said that insulting people you are arguing with is pointless and idiocracy as it makes you insta-lose arguments
2017-06-02 19:48
9 replies
ok kid , keep trying to act smart when you are inside a makiavelic piece of shit with mental issues.
2017-06-02 19:50
8 replies
As passionate as you are about this topic, im sure you can win some arguments and make people think differently with logical reasoning and a non-agressive tone. :-) PS: I have mental issues? You type like a typical internet warrior with some serious issues in your life. Sort them out mate, i believe in you! After you have sorted them out i am 100% ready to have a normal civilized non-hate filled conversation.
2017-06-02 19:54
7 replies
"muslims arent human" "40 years of maga , lets go" go start conversations with rednecks.
2017-06-02 19:55
6 replies
I've already said this is satire and not ment to be taken seriously. Satire, the use of humour, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues. I don't geniunely believe that, its a joke on the HLTV community as well as the trump administration. I do consider myself a right-winger, but this does not mean i support everything trump or his supporters advocate for (e.x banning muslims.)Like i've said time and time again, you dont need to insult (you shouldnt either) to get your point across. I'm not you enemy buddy, i probably dislike the ALT-righters as much as you do.
2017-06-02 19:59
2 replies
well , first think about what you say , then say it if you not to look like an absolute moron , for now you lost it with me . try another time
2017-06-02 20:01
1 reply
Alright, buddy. If you say i lost i guess i did, even though throughout this entire conversation you provided no proof or anything even close, you merely attacked me, but if that counts as a win for you, please, continue lying to yourself. Peace out bud, hope you reconsider and take my advice, looks like you really need it. Getting constantly harrassed isn’t nice, so HMU if u ever reconsider, i’ll be happy to have a rational discussion with you as you seem to at the very least have a lot of passion. :-)
2017-06-02 20:07
I'm a calm, collected person ready for intelligent conversations, can you say the same?
2017-06-02 20:00
2 replies
i cant even reply anymore to your last comment i can only report you :D
2017-06-02 20:08
1 reply
Alright, ill probably be in the HLTV discord if you ever want to have a rational discussion about anything :-)
2017-06-02 20:10
+1 to that. Amen brother.
2017-06-02 17:04
6 replies
not really, read my reply to that post, this dude is a fucking moron also this i.imgur.com/dYrh8IQ.jpg
2017-06-02 19:26
5 replies
Your reply isn't exactly the truth. You can easily find documents produced by NASA (aka from your own nation) that disputes what you are saying in the pure technical terms. Some guy who is an environment specialist for CNN and previously for CBS posted it on his twitter. Can't be arsed to find it atm. Secondly, there is some problems with the insight into China in the agreement sure. It's far from perfect, but it's a step in the right direction. China is making substantial development funding 900 billion usd into clean energy developmental projects. They got their wakeup call with the serious pollutions that drove people out of several of their major cities. India has already been on the clean solar energy wagon for a while, trying to get more major players in on it. These countries make progress while at the same time the second biggest CDE problem in the world, aka the US, goes backwards and destroys more nature with reopening and opening new coal mines and so on. But hey, based on your reasoning that "even if one assumes human CO2 emissions are driving climate change" I'm not expecting anything else than attempts at denial. Just like your republicans are trying to deny climate change is ongoing because they are being paid to do so by big oil and miningcompanies. Remind me again, who is the biggest campaign contributors for the republicans? I'm not saying that climate change wouldn't happen if we stopped/lowered our CDE to a managable amount. But, and here's the big but, it speeds it the fuck up. However, america is just so damn important by itself that it can't be arsed to make any changes. I like the US (actually lived there for a few years), but you are ignorant assholes at times. This is one of those times. I'm gonna stop responding to you at this point, because from previous experiences, I know nothing will change your mind.
2017-06-02 19:40
4 replies
so you basically ignored every point that was made and just called me a republican who denies science YOU'RE The fucking idiots denying science, this is NOT "settled" science. but hey, what should I expect from a cucked swede who won't even source what he's saying? And btw, even if you did, it still doesn't change ANYTHING I said or ANY of my points. You're the same fucking people who think Russia is colluding with the USA and the Macedonian's spread fake news that convinced enough people to vote for Trump. You are totally brainwashed, no surprise citing CNN though. What the FUCK does oil companies have to do with anything I said? Christ you're retarded
2017-06-02 19:45
1 reply
its funny how you are the retard here but living in ignorance in your bubble. nationalist with double digits iq desperate to defend his clown president even tho the whole world can see he's a retard who only cares about money and his own image destroyng everything else without second toughts.
2017-06-02 23:57
Funny you say NOTHING will change my mind when you dumb fuckers will literally defend your bullshit climate hoax to your last breath no matter what. Nothing will change YOUR mind you stupid fucking moron
2017-06-02 19:47
well spoken
2017-06-02 18:46
1 reply
not really, read my reply, this dude is a fucking moron also this i.imgur.com/dYrh8IQ.jpg
2017-06-02 19:26
The Paris Agreement is bunk and ought to be ignored, even if one assumes human CO2 emissions are driving climate change. The Paris Agreement hopes to reduce CO2 output. So what are the goals and projections?
2017-06-02 19:21
11 replies
…the estimated aggregate greenhouse gas emission levels in 2025 and 2030 resulting from the intended nationally determined contributions do not fall within least-cost 2 C scenarios but rather lead to a projected level of 55 gigatonnes in 2030,
2017-06-02 19:24
3 replies
page 3 PARIS AGREEMENT unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/.. The latest numbers for CO2 emissions I have are from 2014, at 35.7 gigatons Page 30 & 31 edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/news_docs/jrc-201.. Trends in Gloabal CO2 emissions 2015 report Emissions have increased from 22.6 gigatons in 1990 to 35.7 gigatons in 2014.
2017-06-02 19:24
2 replies
Here is temperature data for that same time period Note between 2001 and 2014 when annual CO2 output increased by nearly 10 gigatons the temperature rise is almost flat. ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/time-series/global/glo.. In other words, according to their own metrics, their plan is going to fail and will require further effort (spending) But if we simply maintain our current CO2 output, we’re good. So what's driving worldwide CO2 emissions increase? What does this agreement actually do? See figure 2.2 on page 13 edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/news_docs/jrc-201..
2017-06-02 19:24
1 reply
Since 1990 all the major contributors to CO2 output are nearly flat, except China. Even India shows only modest increase. In fact China accounts for half of the worldwide CO2 increase since 2001, 5 gigatons. Note that Chinas 10.6 gigaton annual CO2 output far exceeds even their "per capita" allotment and accounts for over 25% of worldwide CO2 output. The Paris Agreement does nothing to address this, in fact China is going to continue to increase CO2 output until 2030 reuters.com/article/us-france-china-clim.. Why would anybody agree to this? It’s insanity! If CO2 output is actually going to ruin the earth, why would we allow the highest and fastest growing contributor of CO2 to continue to increase output? And it isn’t because China is developing country; no other region or country is increasing their CO2 output at anywhere close to the rate China has over the last 15 years. India for example releases about a quarter of the CO2 as China. The Paris Agreement sets out to put the entire world at a disadvantage to China, little wonder China seeks to be a “leader” in climate change. We have the goddamn documents!
2017-06-02 19:25
You don't have to "assume" anything, we know it. "So what are the goals and projections?" "The Paris Agreement hopes to reduce CO2 output. " Hello? Maybe actually read about the agreement before you call it "bunk and ought to be ignored".
2017-06-02 19:27
6 replies
maybe read my entire reply that i had to chain together cuz hltv is fucking retarded
2017-06-02 19:28
4 replies
It's hilarious how you don't even understand the things you copy paste. You don't even seem to realize that this graph shows the annual anomaly, not the total increase (the anomalies add up). Here is the actual comparison: de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globale_Erw%C3%A4r.. Yes, the agreement doesn't go far enough (mainly because certain countries used their power during the process in which the agreement was defined to keep the regulations as low as possible), we would have to be even more strict if we cared for out planet, but how the fuck does that justify ditching the agreement completely? It's not like Trump bailed out because he wants an even more strict agreement, he wants no limitations at all, no agreement that would have any effect. Of course China has the highest increase, because it's still going through a massive industrialization process. If you would compare the USA's emission level at the beginning of its industrialization with 20 years later you would have the same massive increase (if not even more). Per capita China still has a lot less emissions than the USA (not even half the value; keep in mind that China has like 5 times the population of the USA and the per capita consumption is much lower) data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.. and unlike the USA, China is still an active part of the agreement and willed to show some responsibility. And no, the agreement also hurts them, as it does everyone, that's the price we got to pay if we want to have a future, the reason why we're having such a hard time dealing with this problem is because everyone is afraid that if he does something against it, he will not be as competitive anymore on the global market as before (because the other sides does nothing the like), so the only solution is: we ALL do what we can in order to get this problem under control. If a major economic power bails out it is going to have disastrous effects. Just copy pasting my previous comment about the China -India situation: China and India are countries that just went respectively are still going through enormous economic development, their whole industrialization process only started a few decades ago (while we had an entire century, giving no fucks about pollution while going through this process). Yes, they are main polluters, but they already show greater responsibilities than the USA, which is a fucking shame. The USA's per head carbon emission is FAR greater than the one of China or India (since these countries have 4-5 times the population and a far lower consumption), and while underdevelopment and poverty is still a big weight on the shoulders of China and India that limits their options, the USA has absolutely no excuse. It has the technologies, the industrial potential and the wealth to go through this process, but refuses to out of pure greed, ignorance and laziness. This Indian woman brings it on point (the whole documentary is btw. worth watching): youtu.be/KpWlzFJw3v8?t=35m3s Nobody in China would ever deny that global warming is real and environment politics have become a very dominant topic in Chinese politics and their society (I guess when you got such polluted cities there's not way to hide it anymore), while in the USA most people don't even seem to give the slightest fuck and they have even voted for a president that does not only not understand the issue but even calls it a hoax. Carbon emission per capita map: upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4.. It would be so important that the US is part of this "change". Not only because you're the second highest emitter (responsible for almost 20% of the world wide emissions), but especially because the signal you just sent out to the world is extremely poisonous, just imagine China and India developing as we did in the past century and reaching the same emission per capita as the US (but with like 3000 million citizens instead of 300). And please, for the love of God, stop linking 4chan comments if you're trying to make a point regarding a scientific matter.
2017-06-02 20:30
3 replies
Its only ever been a bankster fraud pushed by goldman sachs quidsapio.wordpress.com/2012/06/06/how-g.. green.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/12/goldm.. blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/2008/.. goldmansachs666.com/2009/05/al-gores-car.. Translation for the gullible: give us money. for vague stuff. and vague goals. and vague methods that cant accomplish goals because we never want the tax gravy train to end. Nor that even have actual metrics for success so we never have to stop taxing everyone. plus trust china when they tell you they will also "do stuff" too. even though they lie their ass off about everything Protip: china pollutes more than DOUBLE the usa. more than usa and europe combined. and while our emissions have declined over the last decade, theirs have exploded
2017-06-02 20:29
1 reply
Okay fuck off. You didn't even read my response, instead you just keep copy pasting things you either don't understand or that are just flat out bullshit. I just explained you the actual difference between China and the USA, but apparently you didn't even bother reading it, instead you keep repeating the same nonsense. Fuck off you ignorant mong.
2017-06-02 20:35
but yeah keep crying about 4chan because it totally debunks your bullshit climate change nonsense and you have nothing to say about it dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192..
2017-06-02 20:30
also read this and stfu pls i.imgur.com/dYrh8IQ.jpg
2017-06-02 19:34
well said but against american autism its like talking to a wall.
2017-06-02 19:37
Hello it's Canada here
2017-06-02 16:35
12 replies
Canada 1st world, USA just a shithole, now its the Canadian dream, no more murican dream
2017-06-02 17:00
10 replies
America Shithole Pick 1
2017-06-02 17:01
9 replies
shithole = America
2017-06-02 17:03
8 replies
i agree
2017-06-02 17:05
Literally one of the best of not the best country in the world to live in
2017-06-02 17:06
6 replies
canada i agree
2017-06-02 17:06
3 replies
No America is u ignorant fuck
2017-06-02 17:08
2 replies
in ur dreams yes, just by insulting u show how smart your are and how ur country is a shithole, but no problem
2017-06-02 17:09
1 reply
Any list of top countries will have is top 10 that's y ur ignorant. Also in terms of quality of life we are even higher
2017-06-03 14:07
you mean third world red states? lolz
2017-06-02 17:16
yeah my obese brother you're right #USATHEBEST
2017-06-03 07:29
wtf
2017-06-02 19:19
did you just tell me to go fuck myself, ricky?
2017-06-02 16:46
#99
 | 
Sweden mixlax
Good bye USA as the leaders of the World, welcome China! How does that bullet in the foot feel?
2017-06-02 16:57
10 replies
this
2017-06-02 16:59
Even with us pulling out of agreement China still polutes way more
2017-06-02 17:02
8 replies
#135
 | 
Sweden mixlax
Yes, twice as much. But half per capita. And they want to improve. USA is like: *Lets bomb the middle east to save our oil, europe takes care of the refugees and terrorist we are to far away... *Lets pollute to World and let the rest of the World take care of it. Then calles sweden Swedistan, whos fault is it that we are getting these arabs here? USA and Russia! Take some f__king resposibility!
2017-06-02 17:18
7 replies
The reason u have Arabs is because ur idiotic government let them in not thinking about ur country's best interest not because of us. We are thinking about my country's best interest by pulling out of an agreement that do proportionally limited our econonomy compared to the rest of the world
2017-06-02 17:22
6 replies
#156
 | 
Sweden mixlax
What should we have done? Sent them back to get killed? Let them drown in the Mediterranean? Where is your humanity Americano? You spent approx 600 billion USD on the military 2015, and imagine how much that also costed the rest of the World to tidy up the mess you make? You shoud have spent 3 billion USD on the Paris deal, that's a piss in the Pacific compared to your wars...
2017-06-02 17:34
1 reply
Yes that's exactly wat ur supposed to do because most Muslims in the middle East arnt able to integrate into countries like Sweden or Germany and there destroying themselves more then we are destroying them
2017-06-02 17:40
Nah, the real reason is your pig of a president sells weapons for billions of dollars to Saudi Arabia, which puts lots more weapons in the region and indirectly supports groups like ISIS. ISIS causes a massive overland migration to Europe. As decent citizens of the world, we take them in (granted, some countries more than others) Meanwhile your president is doing his very best to block refugees from the region where USA's interference is the main contributor of instability. And you wonder why so many people hate the US? :S Hmm wonder why. I hope this wasn't too much information for your burger brain to process.
2017-06-02 18:58
3 replies
"ISIS causes a massive overland migration to Europe." you said it urself we don't support isis in the ways u say
2017-06-02 19:04
2 replies
I knew it was too much information for you ... USA IS INDIRECTLY SUPPORTING ISIS BY SALE OF WEAPONS TO SAUDI ARABIA.
2017-06-02 19:05
1 reply
We have gave the Saudi Arabian government guns to increase there national security. How exactly did isis get them unless ur saying that the Saudi Arabian government supports isis
2017-06-02 19:09
#120
 | 
Syria polaker
Tier 99 geopolitics knowledge spotted
2017-06-02 17:08
Dont worry, while our economy is eclipsing anybody else who gets close, we will also be reducing our carbon emissions more than any other country. We already heavily invest in green technologies with or without this stupid treaty. There is no point for us to give money to countries who are not going to do the same. This was just one more way for the rest of the world to try and stifle the American economy. forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2016/06/19/the-.. No treaty needed, get on our level kiddos
2017-06-02 17:21
+1
2017-06-02 17:23
Lol cry more kid. We are on top of the world. You look up to us. WE SET the RULES and you follow. We will only do what's in our best interest and you have to adjust to that.
2017-06-02 17:35
9 replies
#161
 | 
Germany Bennime
this b8 cant get more obvious lol
2017-06-02 17:59
6 replies
Wait? Everything is true. USA is on top of the world. Everyone envies USA. Everyone dreams of living in america.
2017-06-02 18:12
5 replies
#188
 | 
Germany Bennime
ok you beat me it can get more obvious
2017-06-02 18:55
#246
 | 
United States BioLine
You're right m8 forgot where I read this but America by itself has enough of a military to take China and Russia on at the same time, and we are EXPANDING the budget even more lol #MAGA
2017-06-02 20:17
3 replies
The day USA has the ball to fire a bullet to China or Russia, I would be 1000 year old guy.
2017-06-03 14:26
2 replies
#301
 | 
United States BioLine
Yes because we seek peace in the world and would never start a fight like dat, but if they ever started somethin we could end it
2017-06-04 03:41
1 reply
"Seek peace"? You must be comedian
2017-06-05 05:47
not sure if a retard or trolling keep stroking your redneck ego dipshit
2017-06-02 19:00
+1
2017-06-03 06:45
america 3rd world incoming xdd
2017-06-02 18:03
2 replies
other way around, bud
2017-06-02 18:28
#180
 | 
United States FatNick
Not even close
2017-06-02 18:32
Fuck Paris Accord.
2017-06-02 18:23
2 replies
#179
 | 
United States FatNick
+1
2017-06-02 18:32
+1 #MAGA Cucks and haters mad af while Trumpmeister is fucking the globalists in the ass.
2017-06-02 19:00
#176
 | 
United States FatNick
Fuck the Paris accords, it accomplished nothing and we were the ones with the most money invested in it. You other broke ass countries need to get your shit together before proposing shit to us from now on. USA USA USA
2017-06-02 18:29
I LOVE HOW HE DOESnt GIVE A SINGLE SHit
2017-06-02 18:53
who the fuck cares about future generations you virtue signaling moron
2017-06-02 19:05
#245
 | 
United States BioLine
Why would we sign, we have to pay the most for the freakin paris accords, is it not enough we protect the world with our military, but also we hav to pay to fix the environment when china and India are pretty much worse then us? fucked up
2017-06-02 20:14
2 replies
2 wrongs don't make a right.
2017-06-03 00:42
1 reply
But a negative multiplied by a negative makes a positive XDDD
2017-06-05 06:14
hahahahahaha poortzerland europoor 3rd worlder nice try hahahahah we're much richer than the poortzland hahahahahahahah usa best country greatest economy is not a small insignificant country like poortzerland hahahahaha 3rd worlder immoral
2017-06-03 07:26
Excuse me but why should USA be obligated to pay and donate money to anything? Why would they give money to build some solar panels in 3rd world country where there is corruption and it would be either ruined, not built, or controlled by warlords etc... And im not going to talk about bureaucrats stealing money...
2017-06-03 14:17
Straight up, EU is just mad that we aren't going to foot the bill anymore lol. We ARE NOT just going to stop taking care of the environment. Even though we pulled out of the agreement, most of our state governments are implementing their own way to help the environment. The Paris agreement was just another way to make us pay even though our economy is shit. And guess where our money went from all these years of being in this agreement. #1 That BIG SHINY TOWER they built to host the meetings. #2 The paychecks of too many CEOs of the agreement. #3 To the black-holes of third world countries. You give them money, it goes to corrupt government officials. You'll see absolute no progress at all. Overall, worthless agreement of where we foot the bill for nothing. We'll be keeping our money now and the state governments will invest it in the right way (at least my state will).
2017-06-05 06:53
BIG
1.22
Envy
4.50
Saints
2.19
Illuminar
1.68
Izako Boars
1.58
Lyngby Vikings
2.30
Bet value
Amount of money to be placed
Winning
Odds total ratio
-
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.