this guy was insane talent. but now he wont have a future
this guy was insane talent, but now he wont have a future !
do u mean fer known as the eco fagger?
Listen here buddy. Don't make claims you cannot back up.
Proof is not something to be taken lightly, the law of evidence regulates the process of proof. The rule of civil and criminal evidence, in conjunction with the rules of procedure, establish the frame work for the process of proof and the conduct of litigation, so that a person claiming something will know what the burden of proof his claims require in order to succeed. It reflects a powerful tool in bringing the guilty to justice, whilst allowing the innocent to go free. In some cases the rules of evidence may actually prevent the truth from being discovered in the wider public interest however we know that is not the case here.
Moreover the general rule is that evidence of the defendant's character and previous convictions will not be admitted at trial (see Art 138 of cr.p.c and Rule-145 of DER). As we shall see a number of rules relating to admissibility and use of evidence are directed towards minimizing the risk of wrongful convictions. And the main risks of error stem largely from the admission of unreliable or prejudicial evidence. Thus this concept of free proof may allow people on twitter to portray unreliable or prejudicial evidence, which lead to a hasty conclusion.
The burden on proof is on your side while you make these claims. When a dispute, whether relating to a civil or criminal matter, reaches the court there will always be a number of issues which one party will have to prove in order to persuade the court to find in his or her favour. The law must ensure certain guidelines are set out in order to ensure that evidence presented to the court can be regarded as trustworthy.
If you cannot do that punishment is more often than not swift in nature. You can also not count on the party to let you walk off freely as being an unreliable witness or claimant may result in legal and perhaps lethal repercussions out of court the likes of which you've never seen before for which you cannot claim amnesty or protection if your claim is proven to be unlawful or slander.
I as KNG will exercise my right of self deference to the fullest and you will seize to exist on this earth morally, legally and most importantly physically.
TL:DR; Prove it or I'll kill you
Im brazilian and I'd pick Rain... he's a beast!
Rain any day. Literally. Fermonkey can only eco frag and lose important rounds due to his retarded movement in-game. Rain is a monster at entrying, and holding sites.
Fer only if he starts practicing again.
You can't compare player that don't have the same role. But as aplayer i would say rain.
Peak wise?, Rain. Performance wise in terms of consistency and all that?, Fer. From what I remember ofc. I havent followed cs a year now tbh.
rain consistent and extremely underrated
Both are stellar players. Rain is hitting some seriously fine form at the moment, however, and has been incredibly consistent in doing so lately. Two things I've always liked about rain:
(1) The fluidity of his mouse movement and his cross-hair placement. His head-shot statistics go a long way towards reflecting just how mechanically sound a player he is -- the Rolls Royce/Spitfire of FaZe clan.
(2) He seems like such a chill person. I've never seen him freak-out, berate or belittle other players. A professional, in every sense of the word.
i like them both, Fer is insanely skilled and aggressive, rain plays smart and very defensive
Fer creates action and plays, rain is passive. both styles can be very dangerous, but I think Fer has been much more successful individually
both are easily top 5 right now
but i prefer fer because he's more aggressive
fer is a top#5 player
im not even sure if rain is a top #20 player ,to do that he has to be insane and consistent, and I dont really see him being that kind of player
in HLTV Rain.
in GAME, reality ferGOD!!!!
rain, cause he is no ecofragger