Thread has been deleted
Last comment
USA stupid?
Netherlands Ye_I_Yeet 
Why do you allow such guns?? I know the 2nd amendement states: 'every citizen has the right to keep and bear arms', but I guess that is only so that the US citizens can protect themselves from potential danger. But do you really need an LMG to protect yourself? The fact that those weapons have huge magazines shows that the intention of the weapon is to neutralize a big amount of people. Can't call that self defense in my opinion. But don't worry, I think I have found a solution. How about a new law that allows citizens to keep and bear arms with a maximum of 5 bullets in the magazine. This way a potential mentally ill person can't deal that much damage, because he has to reload after 5 bullets. Also every type of explosive should be forbidden. ez?
2017-10-04 15:17
Why do u believe everything that is shown on TV??
2017-10-04 15:18
ur telling me people in the US don't own fully automatic rifles?
2017-10-04 22:41
#69
 | 
North America Foxaika 
There are *some* but the only legal ones are made prior to 1986, are extremely expensive, and heavily regulated. That's not what happened here. Either these weapons were obtained illegally, modified (potentially illegal), or he paid exorbitant amounts of money for them.
2017-10-05 09:16
i saw some media write that he modified those guns rly hard.. could be lies or asumptions coz media (riiight?)
2017-10-05 13:36
this is one of the dumbest threads iv seen... automatic rifles have been banned for decades and magazine size is normally limited to 10-20 (depends on state), and even New York has the limit down to 5.
2017-10-06 04:08
yep dumbest thread for a dumb standpoint
2017-10-06 04:20
only 7.5 (Hawaii only has the limit for hanguns) states have limits on magazine size that limit it to 15 rounds or below. That's not the same thing as magazine size being "normally" limited to 10-20 rounds
2017-10-06 04:34
nt, then why the Las Vegas shooter had le automatic rifles?
2017-10-06 12:34
he had a bump stock and modified his gun. He also had an illegal magazine size. Just because a gun is banned doesnt mean that nobody can get their hands on it. I saw a youtube video were some people bought a dirty bomb over in ukraine... nt
2017-10-06 20:44
#2
 | 
Netherlands Dimok_Beast 
/closed
2017-10-04 15:21
#7
 | 
Faroe Islands I_Oof_myself 
*/close /close
2017-10-04 15:26
#8
 | 
Netherlands Dimok_Beast 
/open hltv.org/team/6137/sk /closed
2017-10-04 15:26
#19
 | 
Faroe Islands I_Oof_myself 
2017-10-04 15:32
#28
 | 
Netherlands Dimok_Beast 
/open imgur.com/a/SoDIy /closed
2017-10-04 15:36
#35
 | 
Faroe Islands I_Oof_myself 
2017-10-04 15:45
#88
 | 
Netherlands Dimok_Beast 
/open imgur.com/a/CL8Iv /closed
2017-10-05 10:10
rekted
2017-10-05 11:24
#101
 | 
Netherlands Dimok_Beast 
hahaha HLTVreportExpert is banned
2017-10-05 12:00
wut i don't see it? prooof ;)
2017-10-05 12:04
#103
 | 
Netherlands Dimok_Beast 
or i'll kil you imgur.com/a/8NLZp
2017-10-05 12:08
HHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHA
2017-10-05 12:08
Be careful with your words Dimok.. imgur.com/a/Ce4uu imgur.com/a/DLgBx imgur.com/a/XZYBT
2017-10-05 16:26
#129
 | 
Netherlands Dimok_Beast 
wtf
2017-10-05 19:19
#130
 | 
Faroe Islands I_Oof_myself 
Is that you in the pics?
2017-10-05 19:25
#131
 | 
Netherlands Dimok_Beast 
no hahah
2017-10-05 19:32
#132
 | 
Faroe Islands I_Oof_myself 
lol so wtf did this guy just post
2017-10-05 19:33
#133
 | 
Netherlands Dimok_Beast 
he searched my name on google pictures and that what u get XD
2017-10-05 19:33
#134
 | 
Faroe Islands I_Oof_myself 
LUL what an idiot hahahaha
2017-10-05 19:34
#135
 | 
Netherlands Dimok_Beast 
"Be careful with your words Dimok.." post random pics of a guy that's not me. if he was smart he would have checked that i was 17 and couldn't be that man HAHHAH idiot
2017-10-05 19:36
#136
 | 
Faroe Islands I_Oof_myself 
Thats true but you can always fake your age on hltv.
2017-10-05 19:36
r u his official assistant lol
2017-10-06 04:08
#128
 | 
Faroe Islands I_Oof_myself 
Post my other dm aswell. PU$$Y
2017-10-05 18:51
Too soon..
2017-10-04 15:22
#5
 | 
United States UncleDick 
sounds good
2017-10-04 15:22
And how dafuq should itbe controled? Is there a gun police that checks every gun and looks how many bullets the are in the mag
2017-10-05 12:56
What kind of question is that, there's no guns for sale in which the clip size is bigger than 5, f.e in Massachusetts the max capacity is 10.
2017-10-05 21:56
#6
Faroe Islands xuan 
even if they ban all weapons, people who want to buy them will still buy them. just that others cant defend themselves (at home obviously, not shooting around in public). thats what most ppl forget talking about that
2017-10-04 15:25
In old times, a civil US militia were highly recommended by some smart people. The reason being that the moment the government takes a big piss upon it's people, it would have immediate consequences. But no civil militia was formed, and thus leaves governments pissing upon it's people nonstop, knowing that the consequences for themselves are close to nonexistent. Same logic can be applied to the globe. N.Korea (as example) despite the nonstop propaganda we are being fed, actually serve a job of stabilization, as other nations (US mainly) will hesitate attacking other nations, knowing that retaliation might occur from another nation. But we are being told the exact opposite nonstop, and most people actually believes that N.Korea and other nuclear weaponized nations are a threat to world peace, when the exact opposite is the actual truth.
2017-10-04 15:30
#52
 | 
United States lumpy seal 
NK having nukes = stabilization. Heard it here first folks.
2017-10-04 16:03
I see that US mass media is doing a fine job brainwashing americans.
2017-10-04 16:07
Of course it is, because those in 'Merica don't understand the drastic consequences that will happen after the kid they call president declares war.
2017-10-05 11:37
That's how they stopped people from doing drugs.
2017-10-04 15:30
#15
Australia anxy 
The 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States is about more than self defence it's also about keeping in line the government, which is why not just Americans but all countries should have access to weapons, governments should be afraid of their citizens less they become tyrannical
2017-10-04 15:31
#53
 | 
United States lumpy seal 
Automatic weapons really aren't needed though.
2017-10-04 16:04
#54
Australia anxy 
To match the government they certainly are
2017-10-04 16:04
#56
 | 
United States lumpy seal 
Definitely not. There's 350+ million people in the US. Keep in mind most of the military and police are also normal citizens who hate the government too. Civilians would win simply by manpower alone, even if all we had were pistols.
2017-10-04 16:05
#58
Australia anxy 
Civilians don't have access to predator drones, military helicopters, combat aeroplanes, tanks etc etc
2017-10-04 16:08
But military does and I doubt that military or some special forces would actually team up with government if something went really bad.
2017-10-04 16:45
#157
 | 
United States lumpy seal 
All those things you mentioned are manufactured by civilian industrial contractors.
2017-10-06 04:57
#70
 | 
Turkey dogboi2001 
Hahahahaha thank god we sent ppl like u to the land down under
2017-10-05 09:14
#17
 | 
North America bloodwolf1710 
The guns the las vegas shooter used are extremly hard to obtained and they were most definitely obtained illegally. There is only 200000 people in america that own automatic ar
2017-10-04 15:37
take away our guns and the govt. will fuck us even harder in the ass on daily bases :D
2017-10-04 15:32
#55
 | 
United States lumpy seal 
Outdated. No need for autos or high capacity magazines.
2017-10-04 16:04
I don't think it's the guns fault. Violent Videogames caused this.
2017-10-04 15:33
#23
 | 
Faroe Islands I_Oof_myself 
nt but not getting baited
2017-10-04 15:35
Don't get me wrong, I'd have a ton of guns if I could. Imagine having a range in the back of your house and shooting AR15's and AK's, that would be sick. But the 2nd amendment is a law from back when americans had to shoot british colonists and pissed off indians on a daily basis. It's not absolutely no ground today whatsoever and only mad old farts who think anti-gun laws are for pussies and potentially speak with a southern accent (sry) do defend it And before anyone says "brazil has strict gun laws and shittons of people die due to crime and etc" - If you think your "we should have guns to defend ourselves" logic would make the number of murders go down instead of increasing exponentially, you're fucking deluded. That being said, yes, if we had the HDI to allow guns I'd want to have a fucking arsenal in the back of my house
2017-10-04 15:34
You could actually argue the opposite relatively easy. You say there is no grounds to own guns like these. So lets think about the second amendment for a second. The original purpose of the amendment was primarily so citizens had a way to stand up and forcefully remove government when it was over reaching. So then we take a look at the military. They are equipped with the most high tech equipment on the planet, and the citizens arent allowed to own automatic firing weapons. So in this case how are we supposed to protect ourselves from our government if they decide to over reach? Well, we cant. therefore you can make the argument that it is unconstitutional for the government to bar us from anything they have access to.
2017-10-05 09:25
#25
 | 
United States eldrexe 
Lol stephen paddock obtained the automatic rifles illegally so if we put gun control in motion, he would still have those guns
2017-10-04 15:36
+1 but don't expect these leftist to understand that
2017-10-04 15:59
xd I'm no leftist xdddddddddd. But still, big guns like that should just not be legal
2017-10-05 09:18
they are already illegal. Full-auto guns have been illegal since the 1980's or something
2017-10-05 14:41
#68
 | 
Other Mukade 
Do you think so? In a country where weapons are so easily obtained you think an illegal one would be hard? Cocaine is illegal and can be obtained on every corner of the street. Don't be so dumb. Even in my country where there no such thing asna fucking gun store we can get guns in the black market quite easily.
2017-10-05 09:08
#113
 | 
United States eldrexe 
Its not hard thats what i said
2017-10-05 13:18
#114
 | 
Other Mukade 
I replied to the wrong person. Sry
2017-10-05 13:24
#116
 | 
United States eldrexe 
Thats ok
2017-10-05 13:36
Automatic rifles are not legal. But it doesn’t matter st the end of the day. If someone wants to get something and they have the money they will
2017-10-04 15:36
#30
 | 
North America bloodwolf1710 
They are legal bit extremly hard to obtain legally
2017-10-04 15:38
Not In all states at least from what I know. And anywhere you go they won’t even allow you to have more then 3 rounds in a magazine. I been to a few shooting ranges. And most of them tell you only 1 round per mag.
2017-10-04 15:44
And it would need to be a military issued gun to be fully auto. I have not seen a single one anywhere that is being sold legally to be fully auto
2017-10-04 15:45
#46
 | 
North America bloodwolf1710 
I just looked it up and i foumd out that u can have a full auto weapon legally as long as it was registered before 1986 or smth
2017-10-04 15:56
not guns kill people, people do. we need to legalize heavy war guns for regular people so shit like in vegas will be shot down way faster. if the average citizien is allowed to carry a sniper rifle the shooter in vegas would be dead in seconds without killing many people.
2017-10-04 15:43
#38
 | 
Denmark dR_JaCkPoT 
8/8 bait you will definitely get a few on that one
2017-10-04 15:50
ty but no bait
2017-10-04 15:51
i need to get better at awping.
2017-10-05 09:19
#126
 | 
Greece hekzy 
I suck with the awp men..
2017-10-05 17:09
you do realize that nearly every shoot out happens at places where its not legal to carry guns? for example: At the gaybar in (colorado I think) the terrorist was able to reload his weapon a few times because no one else had guns to take him down. If they where allowed to carry guns there, he would've maybe killed 1-2 people.
2017-10-04 15:49
+1 we need to allow rifles in night clubs to take terrorists down!
2017-10-04 15:51
well its basically up to the owner if he wants to have it legal in his bar. But it would make it easier to take down terrorist, because it takes some time for the police to arrive. And bare hands doesn't do much against someone with a gun.
2017-10-04 15:53
True but tbh i wouldnt carry my rifle to a nightclub lol
2017-10-04 15:54
+1 you never know when someone orders shots for everyone.
2017-10-04 15:55
lmao
2017-10-04 15:56
#41
 | 
Denmark Baitvice 
The guy that did the Las Vegas shooting used automatic weapons which are banned.There is a law agaist murder, yet people still commit it.Banning guns won't fix this problem.
2017-10-04 15:52
+1 but these stupid leftist dont understand simple logic
2017-10-04 15:54
ye how about making it hard for nutbags to buy weapons no one is proposing to ban guns guess what this will never happen because the gop is owned by the nra lul untill that you'll see mass shootings every half a year
2017-10-04 16:38
#94
 | 
Turkey dogboi2001 
+1 fuck the NRA, I can't believe it's a thing in a developed country like USA
2017-10-05 11:21
#123
 | 
Denmark Baitvice 
Yeah fuck the NRA, says the Turkish guy.Maybe if you had guns, someone like Erdogan wouldn't be able to go full dictator on you.Sure tell me how he is so awesome now.
2017-10-05 15:37
i dont think it is clear yet if those were automatic. They are saying he used a 'bump-stock device' which turned the guns automatic.
2017-10-05 09:22
#108
 | 
Denmark Baitvice 
Doesn't matter, now the leftist are saying he passed all background checks anyway.So what's their solution? BAN ALL GUNS, because that is what they really want, but they don't want to say it.
2017-10-05 12:53
#49
 | 
Malaysia phyzell 
The equity market in the US are constantly rising due to global climate change and refugee crisis. Invest in a country with a good weather doesn't hurt your wallet at all.
2017-10-04 15:57
If you would do your research you would realise that Nevada has some of the loosest gun laws in the United States unlike most other states you do not need a permit to buy a gun. You need a permit to carry like all other states but buying a gun in Nevada is like going to Wal-Mart to buy some milk and cookies for the school field trip.
2017-10-04 16:09
now I'm not some fucking retard feminist you better bring the FBI if you think your gonna take my guns away but I think in all states you should need a permit to purchase a gun.
2017-10-04 16:13
from someone who has served in the military and has literally seen what assault rifles were designed to do, i do not understand why civilians need to own one high powered semi-automatic rifles are only designed to kill other humans. they are not practical in defense because they are simply too powerful and they're not practical for hunting i like going to a range and shooting targets just like other people, but realistically they are not necessary to own...
2017-10-04 16:27
I actually dont necessarily agree with all of this. Of course you are right, guns were made to kill. They are a tool specifically for that purpose, and I wont deny it. However, i think that having an AR is actually a fairly reasonable choice for many of the purposes you listed. Modern AR's are quite handy in a number of situations because of their adaptability. In hunting situations it is a good round that will put down large animals quickly at possibly far ranges. Of course in this situation specifically that many rounds is not legal to hunt with. Im pretty sure that the AR is a fairly common choice for hunting in the US. In terms of home defense, i think there are other choices as well. I actually use my high powered rifles for marksmanship or hunting, so i prefer home defense with handguns or a shotgun. However I think in many emergencies the fact that you can attach things to the AR with relative ease makes it a great multipurpose tool to fit several different emergency scenarios.
2017-10-05 09:34
the state that i grew up in along with the surrounding states do not allow people to hunt with 5.56/.223 or 7.62x39. Killing coyotes or wild boars with them, simply because they're invasive and dangerous to the wildlife, is different though. if i'm not mistaken people can use whatever they have for those hunting with 7.62x51/.308 is not even practical lol... there would be like nothing left of the deer. i mean i guess if you're bear hunting??? the .308 is simply way too powerful for traditional hunting lots of flatland states even have bans on hunting with rifles all together simply because the bullet travels so far with such an effective range that state governments are not willing to take the risk of a hunter missing and the bullet going somewhere that was not intended utilizing an AR for self defense is not only non-practical, but it's reckless and dangerous to the people living around you. the muzzle velocity of a standard AR-15 or similar rifle shooting 5.56 is approx 3,000ft/s... if an assailant comes at you in your home and you shoot him with that rifle from approx 5-15ft away, the bullet will travel through them and into the house next door. god forbid you miss and it keeps on going somewhere else you didn't intend... not to mention they're bulky and typically stored somewhere in a spot that won't be convenient for you in the event that you actually have a break in. pistols were designed to be effective at close ranges. several ammunition manufacturers make hollow points or other types of bullets that are specifically designed to take down a target at close range as well. they're easy to carry and they're small enough to be kept on a table or in a drawer by your couch or bed.... they're the ideal home defense tool... we're talking about home defense here, not taking down a target from 300yds away like i said, i love target practice too.. i used to have an ACR when i was younger and it was a blast shooting it. but it absolutely was not necessary to have at all and after being in the military for so long and understanding the practical use of a weapon like that, i fully agree with the fight to remove them from the civilian home
2017-10-05 16:58
.30 caliber rounds have been some of the most popular and widely used calibers to hunt deer with for a long time. Though .270 is a popular round as well I guess. Im in Washington and here there is good Deer/Elk/black bear hunting so 30-06 or .308 is probably a lot more popular and practical in this area. And while I do agree with you that generally an AR is over kill for home defense as the rounds DO travel up to several miles if not stopped, I still think that the availability of not only the rifle itself, but also the ammunition makes it an attractive and reasonable choice for quite a few people. you can get AR's with 16 inch barrels making it easy to store and more practical in close range situations. Again I think the ability to have a wide variety of attachments makes it a great multi tool in many situations. As we have seen looting take place in time of natural disaster I think that and AR with an attached flashlight is a very reasonable tool to protect your property and family with. I think there can be more practical tools depending on what you want to prepare for, but my view on this is we should let each person decide themselves if its the right tool for the job.
2017-10-05 21:48
for sure, i suppose a 30 cal round would be ideal for elk or larger game like that. i come from the midwest so we don't really have those types of animals unless you're in the far northern area of the midwest but once again... i just don't see the practicality of using an AR as a home defense tool. say for example you and your family are sitting in the living room watching tv one evening and an assailant, or group of assailants, comes to your front door... do you have enough time to go upstairs or downstairs or wherever it is that you keep your rifles and effectively engage those assailants? or would it be more practical to have a pistol in the table next to your lazyboy and immediately have it when you need it? those guys are going to come at you faster than lightning... there simply isn't enough time to grab a rifle in that situation unless, for some insane reason, you have them stored in your living room.... in a different situation when you're not located by your front door, i suppose you could have enough time to grab a rifle... have you also thought about the noise that a gun like that produces? high powered rifles are absolutely deafening when you're indoors.. pistols are bad as well, but they don't even come close to the noise that a rifle like that produces. you fire one shot and you completely lose all hearing and might even become dizzy from the effects... ive been in a couple situations where M4s are fired indoors and have literally bled from my ears.... i have permanent hearing damage that resulted from it i dunno man.. it's an interesting debate... curious to see how things develop with this situation
2017-10-05 22:05
I would be less upset if they passed legislation regarding bump stocks. Im really not sure how i honestly feel about bump stocks, but id be much more open to them limiting accessories like this rather than banning firearms. If we have reasonable legislation banning automatic weapons already I dont think its a stretch to outlaw an accessory that effectively turns semi auto to auto. I think in that case its ok because its legislation regarding accessories and not a firearm itself, therefore , not unconsititutional
2017-10-05 23:36
USA has the closest to the original Democracy system. Only a citizen with weapon is a true free citizen
2017-10-04 16:42
so isnt it obvious that true freedom is a hypothetical utopian concept. More than 'true' freedom people need food, houses and health care right now.
2017-10-05 09:15
You could probably make a good argument that 'true' freedom is a utopian concept. This is why you find conservatives agreeing on specific taxes and things like that. If you want roads someone has to pay for them. Many Americans tend to value the fact that the government isnt there to tell you how to live your life. The government is there specifically to protect us from anyone telling us how to live our lives. An interesting point here is that if you do some research on the Articles of Confederation, which was actually the first form on government created by the original colonies, it was pretty much the 'true' freedom you are talking about. They realized that this form of government was actually extremely bad, and it failed within 10 years or so.
2017-10-05 09:41
you seem to have good knowledge about this. My idea that absolute freedom is unrealistic and a modern construct to be sold to masses, comes from the observation, that when totally free, men would'nt know what to do with their lives. Their is nothing like a perfect life, atleast on earth. We can not have it all, without trading off in some aspects. We will have the privileged and the unprivileged in capitalistic system and when this happens men will resort to violence. Governments have to ensure that this is minimized. Allowing guns in name of 'true freedom' is definitely not a practical step towards that goal. I understand the argument that "the government isnt there to tell you how to live your life. The government is there specifically to protect us from anyone telling us how to live our lives. ", but the nuance difference I believe is hard to grasp for common folks.
2017-10-05 10:04
#127
 | 
Greece hekzy 
You have to be idiotic to compare the spathi and spears to semi-automatic weaponry. It's like saying that true democracy in ancient greece is if every man had an army.
2017-10-05 17:17
#72
 | 
North America Foxaika 
I doubt there are many(if any) LMGs in circulation lol. I'd like an M249 SAW though. For wood cutting, of course.
2017-10-05 09:19
#75
 | 
Europe tweekzter 
Why do you allow weed? :D chrisJ would hit more without smoking so much.
2017-10-05 09:20
xd I don't think he smokes anymore tbh. BTW weed doesn't harm people as much as guns do
2017-10-05 09:28
#79
 | 
United States pepehands420 
he's smoked in the past? i wonder how many pros smoke cannabis in their downtime
2017-10-05 09:33
xd I think most people here have smoked at least once
2017-10-05 09:33
#82
 | 
United States pepehands420 
yeah i went there last spring, weed wasn't too good compared to california :/
2017-10-05 09:35
depends on where u got it I guess...
2017-10-05 09:35
#87
 | 
Europe tweekzter 
I have a feeling that most people here on HLTV are fully on weed while posting. :D
2017-10-05 10:07
nah
2017-10-05 11:07
The loops you have to go through to own an automatic weapon as a civilian in the US are extreme. Very high annual cost with heavy regulation. And by high cost I mean something around thousands if not tens of thousands per year.
2017-10-05 09:42
Imagine a hord of ghetto colored people invading your property to rape your daughters? That's right u need a large magazine to defend yourself.
2017-10-05 11:10
nah
2017-10-05 11:12
xd
2017-10-05 11:29
quality post baguette
2017-10-06 04:07
#98
 | 
Israel BoyMcFacto 
So what? let them buy guns.
2017-10-05 11:39
#99
 | 
Germany Merkelistan 
every citizen should be able to own a tank in self defense
2017-10-05 11:42
#100
 | 
Netherlands Phyrhex 
I feel like americans are just fucking retarded and mentally unstable and thats why they have quite some mass shootings happinin there. Normal people who possess big ass guns wont do mass shootings. Bunch of sickos really.
2017-10-05 11:50
#105
 | 
United States FBI_Agent 
usa is stupid but america not
2017-10-05 12:11
#107
 | 
United States StewieOnLAN 
Yah my country is fucking retarded but i own a lot of guns. Its not the guns its the person shooting the guns Btw 5 bullets magazine is not enough to defend urself
2017-10-05 12:20
defend yourself from what retard, in 2017 ? you dont live in favela with constant threats , its a 1st world country with very competent institutions. were you ever in a situation when you needed to fire a gun because no other option ? its just a mental ilness that you have wich is allowing slauthers periodically and so many lives taken away,
2017-10-05 14:56
Home break ins happen pretty often and if hes in my house and i I c him as a threat to me or my family safety Im definitely gonna shoot the dude. Saying there is nothing to defend yourself from is just wrong.
2017-10-06 04:05
you're just primitive . nokappa. the cruel reality is that any retard can kill anybody at anytime. this is usa in 2017. you must be proud. you think having a personal gun available to anybody makes you safe but it has the opposite effect in reality , but you dont realize until something happens affecting you personally. typical teenager mentality.
2017-10-06 12:00
Yep ur right if im in danger a gun is useless. Cant do anything with it
2017-10-06 12:39
you're a virgin nerd in the first place. what danger ? what guns ?
2017-10-06 13:33
Ur some sort of,delusional idealist to think there is no danger in developed society
2017-10-06 15:06
you"re some sort of 17 yo virgin nerd who think he knows everything but you didnt even start your life yet
2017-10-06 15:21
So i c weve got to the point in the conversation where u realized ur points were shit so u go for insults
2017-10-06 15:23
im just stating facts , you're the one who's insulting , kid
2017-10-06 15:24
Every single "fact" u have said has been wring
2017-10-06 15:26
Why would you want to allow home burglars and the such to get at your property? America is mostly not a favela but theres still a lot of crime especially theft. If someone was breaking into your property are you just gonna stand there and watch them steal your stuff or are you going to stop it with your legally owned firearm. There's no excuse for saying there's no threats because its not like women don't get raped, banks don't get robbed etc. These are all stopped when guns are at play.
2017-10-06 04:06
yeah dude , the whole 1st world leave in peace without guns only you need to "defend yourself" with guns , causing 35k+ deaths per years and mass slauthers every 2 months. you know what , just keep your guns because you deserve your faith since you are barbarians.
2017-10-06 11:51
Moat mass shootings are dine with illegal weapons
2017-10-06 12:39
wich were bought legally and modified
2017-10-06 13:34
No a the weapons in mass shootings most of the time are legally attained. Most of the times in shootings the weapons arnt modified
2017-10-06 15:03
bullshit
2017-10-06 15:22
Bo not bs its 100 percent true and ur the one thats literally making stuff up
2017-10-06 15:22
and again you go into your bubble . im not even gonna reply to you on this forum anymore , you're a waste of time kid.
2017-10-06 15:23
#110
 | 
United States Goodguesser 
So the reason gun control is stupid is for two reasons 1. It is literally impossible to enforce and creates a black market 2. Background checks have prevented so many shootings the number is insanely high p.s it also keeps the murder rate down according to a lot of research
2017-10-05 13:00
#111
 | 
China Sk3y 
5 rounds? 5 headshots, ez gg.
2017-10-05 13:00
#112
 | 
United Kingdom HarryBotter 
"every citizen has the right to keep and bear arms', but I guess that is only so that the US citizens can protect themselves from potential danger. " It is actually is refering to swords, Bows and muskets. Besides in written in an amendment if I am not mistaken.
2017-10-05 13:05
it was also after we just declared independence from a corrupt country, the citizens were afraid of another great britain. there's no use for guns now bc our government has fucking tanks
2017-10-05 13:28
or just allow smoke and flash nades for defense.
2017-10-05 14:06
#119
gas | 
Korea kaiske10v 
you need a class 3 license for a machine gun already
2017-10-05 14:10
you must be mentally challanged even to own a pistol for "self defence" in 2017 in a 1st world country and they sell AK's for 700$ in pawn shops in us like its bread so just imagine what a retarded nation in this sense.... they still didnt mentally recover from the civil war as you can see guns all over the place just like racism. usa in 2017....
2017-10-05 14:50
He got the gun illegally. Gun control laws would literally have had no effect.
2017-10-05 19:39
#140
 | 
United States sushiisdank 
+1 ty for having a brain
2017-10-05 21:58
#141
 | 
Ukraine niXoN|w1 
Columbine WutFace
2017-10-05 22:01
tbh our gun control laws are just useless, people get guns illegally all the time and gun laws cant even stop that. Well come to think of it, our country really is pathetic in many ways which really sucks
2017-10-05 22:01
#145
 | 
Brazil just_many 
such guns ain't allowed. just search for it.
2017-10-05 23:40
usa the smartest and most advanced empire that ever existed
2017-10-06 04:08
it's called economy. guns bring money. i'm actually surprised this kinda thing doesn't happen more often. plus if we get invaded in a war watch out for grandmas tec-9
2017-10-06 04:23
#154
 | 
United States pieceofpi 
1) it is illegal to own an LMG 2) it is illegal to own a full-auto rifle/machine gun 3) the guns used in the Vegas shooting were illegally modified to be full-auto 4) casino security is more at fault than any gun law for allowing a guy to get 10 AR's into a hotel room 5) under 20% of all US shootings are committed by legal gun owners
2017-10-06 04:33
8/8
2017-10-06 12:36
Well Americans are stupid isnt that obvious?
2017-10-06 12:42
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.