Oh and gun balance is shit, only main weapons are good those being M4 AK GALIL FAMAS AWP
I doesn't think that but s1mple is team destroyer and pasha must retire asap...
you know nothing jon aerial
1. perfect hitboxes
2. perfect first bullet accuracy
3. sooooo good
4. okay, you might be right
5. yes, but it's funny
lol, when standard pistols were better than the ones you could buy :D:D
actually deagle is fucking OP in 1.6
well, the game is way too old to be consider a good game nowadays. game was getting bad and still Valve decided to fuck it even more, smh.
+The people that play these days are toxic and dumb af
I thought the random spray patterns were in Source?
yea honestly it had its issues worked for those back then, I think if you fixed some issues like ones you mention it would still beat cs go tho xDDD
"SHITTY F*CKING HITBOXES"
compared to csgo they are 10/10
i wouldnt say it was a bad game but it definately isnt perfect like 1.6 fanboys make it out to be
Yeah, first bullet accuracy definetely makes a game bad. It's supposed to be a random piece of shit like in csgo.
It's almost 20 years old, I don't think anyone expects it to be considered a top-notch game in 2017.
Unlike CS:GO, cs 1.6 have intuitive recoil mechanics. Screenshakes are what builds recoil, not a floaty recoil pattern like in CSGO in where screenshaking is merely an side effect that serves as distraction instead. Yes, recoil is random, but intuitive recoil mechanics makes it possible to control it.
Shitty hitboxes yes, old game after all.
Yes, not very good first bullet accuracy.
Deagle not beign accurate handcannon in 1.6 isn't neccesarily a bad thing.
Flashbangs are easy to avoid and if blinded they still don't deafen you like they do in CSGO.
Yes you can wallbang, but whenever you like it or not depends on which end of stick are you. If you could use wallbangs yourself you wouldn't complain about it.
Nades doing consistent damage is better than how sometimes they don't do damage in CSGO.
bad game for bad players, noob's
gameplay was genius and different, fucking awesome for its time
I prefer cs go now but it's still a great game, with different mechanics.
Cs never intended to be a realistic game
I don't give a shit about what's better
I just know 1.6 I enjoyed a lot more and had a lot
more fun when playing
Csgo can suck my Indian prawns
Nades bounce unrealistic from walls, and nades are 1 pixels wide so you can throw them trought microscopic hole. And Tactic shield for CT is uselles, like night vision.
And people say CS 1.6 > CSGO, people cant see quality
Most popular e-sport for like 10+ years straight, it's pretty much the reason team based e-sport exists.
People loved the game so much, most of the pro's were travelling the world playing tournaments without even getting paid.
Yeah must have been a terrible game.
Also when you get shot you cant fucking move it's so annoying
another 15 y.o. clown who doesn`t even know wtf is 1.6 and didn`t get this time of beauty where all the players and community were together CS:GO>1.6 only in terms of money sponsorship and development all around the scene (MINE OPINION)
your mum is shit cs 1.6 best game cso go suck only russian 0 brain player and hack and baybe skins
Man, my eyes can only see truth.
I dont like 1.6 so i agree with you
Then again, you could jump shoot with 100% accuracy with the G3SG1, the shotguns, and the glock (and the duals, right?), so your argument is invalid.
1 Nov, 2000
Current players: 15,788
movement was a lot smoother though
Nice meme kiddo, 1.6 is the 2nd best cs of all time
at least you dont jumpkill all time with all guns and needs practice movement and accuracy.
go suck dicks
Comments like that show why the swedish scene sucks on 2017.
have you considered that any video game made in the 20th century, looks shit by 2017 standards??
fuck the source engine, its a trash piece of software that cant handle FPS games, terrible networks programming, and it accounts more for people with ping 100 ..... stupid
Quake Engine was the shit, real FPS engine made for LAN and low ping environments..... guess what the half-life engine was made on (hint: it was the quake engine) thats why the old CS was way better than any SAUCE iterations.
SHITTY F*CKING HITBOXES
FUCKING STUPID DUMB FIRST BULLET ACCURACY
DEAGLE IS SO SHIT
Flashbangs blind you for AGES.
1.6 > go > source
also Valve ruined cs 1.6 with that dumb update they did in 2013
1.6 was perfect..
1.6 > csgo
1.6 Deagle was better than csgo..
1.6 Flashbangs are better
0 acc 1st bullet.. shud be like that in csgo.. not moving it shud hit the spot..
The only reaso n why 1.6 is overrated because when source came out it was ass so people continued to plai 1.6 for 7-8 years and with that people are getting too used to the game and Go is much better and different and mad old heads want shit mechanics back and shit best example silent run. Oh wallbangs are cool just learn them and u kill people without seing them so mechanical aim is not as important because just shoot through the wall where u know angles and you are set. Outdated game with many problems and will never be better than Go in terms of gameplay.
Bunch of 2005+ born kids bashing CS 1.6
Cant believe so many threads about 1.6.. Yes it is iconic game, but the game is way too old, CSGO is much more better than 1.6, you just cant compare it. People talking 1.6 is better than CSGO are probably sh*tty players that cant go above Gold Nova 2 and everything is annoying for them.
I'm not hating 1.6, I was playing it since 2002
Cs 1.6 is a great childhood memory, i guess youre simply experiencing this with csgo.
Only noob kids who didn't play 1.6 in it's peak can say shit like this. I for one am very happy 1.6 has gotten a very worthy succesor in the form of CS:GO. I never did and never will consider CS:Source a game that was worthy or could take over from 1.6.
First bullet accuracy is perfect, you can learn spraying perfectly just takes maybe even more time than in CS:GO. HeatoN knew how to do it in 2002 so you saying it's impossible is retarded. 1.6 deagle > CS:GO deagle anytime.
The rest of the things you list like wallbangs are an essential part of 1.6 and one of the reasons why many people were reluctant to change to CS:GO, which in my opinion could have more wallbang spots. It's a different game, harder to master than CS:GO and you need more time. People who say 1.6 sucks were probably total noobs who never played a proper 5on5 match in 1.6.
If graphics weren't an issue for sponsors etc. we would still probably have 1.6 on tournaments it is that good. 1.6 > CS:GO > other crap wannabe CS games.
i have 4k real hours in 1.6, and i can say this is best fps game in history.
Good for being bad. Enjoyable
Deagle was obviously better. Glock was shit, which is good, ecos or force buys were really hard to win. You'd have to drop like 2 aks to win a force buy as T. AWP was obviously much better, movement made the skill gap between good and godlike players huge. I agree with the first bullet accuracy and the recoil tho, they were shit. Buggy smokes were also bad. Honestly CSGO would be perfect with the 1.6 movement and AWP
Don't lie, none of you newfags touched 1.6
what the hell are you talking about
clearly you never played 1.6 before valve killed it by fucking with all the values
you think spray was random? go search heaton recoil control on youtube, spray was the same every single time. it had a pattern you could adapt to.
this is funny, any source hate threads would get INSTANTLY DELETED
1.6 hate threads = no problem
NICE ADMINS NICE LOLOLOLOL FUCKING JOKE!
The main reason why CS:GO is better than 1.6 is that CS:GO allows you to crouchstrafe and spray accurately, which is cool for all those handless kids playing it :-)
this turned only after SHITTY PATCH 2013 when CS:GO was released.
so f*ck off noob.
lmao dude you must be so stupid if you think that CS 1.6 is shit
the fact that you could wallbang is what made the game fun u monkey
Did u knew that cs 1.6 was released like 14years ago lol?
Dude you're 19. You were a baby when 1.6 was at its prime and you'll never understand why people think it's the greatest version of cs ever.
All of the things you "hate" made 1.6 the way it was.
Strats were made around wallbangs and 5 man nade stacks throwing at a wall.
Spray patterns isn't even an argument. Separated the men from the boys and that's why players like f0rest and neo were brilliant.
You forgot one major thing that's a positive for 1.6 - movement. Nothing compares.
User id:771346. I think it says all when it comes to your knowledge of cs. When did u start play, last month, last week?
DISCLAIMER: This is an opinion of someone who owns 1.6 but has never actively played it. If you don't want to read an opinion from a "newfag", skip this comment.
I've never actively played 1.6 to be fair (though I did try it out and it was a lot of fun to play), but people seem to have this attitude where no matter what happenes, they will never accept cs:go as the successor of 1.6, even if Valve would finally decide to make a great game out of cs:go (which it isn't really at the moment, I can understand that). It's not that it isn't a great game, perhaps it's better than cs:go, but some people imply that 1.6 was flawless, which, from what I've seen and tested, it wasn't. That doesn't mean that it's a less fun game than cs:go, or even less competetively viable, it's better in these aspects, but some people just want cs:go to be another 1.6 and are blinded by nostalgia, and anyone who disagrees with them is a "newfag with no idea about the glory days". I might not know anything about the pro scene in 1.6, or the more advanced aspects of the game mechanics, but why does that mean that I can't be entiteled to my own opinion. Here are some things I noticed which make 1.6 the game it is (which is great, but people want all these things to be the same in cs:go, that's the problem):
-As the OP said, 3 different spray patterns. In a way, this makes the game more skillful, but overall I think it's better to just have 1 spray pattern and memorize it, instead of having to adjust it while spraying.
-The wallbanging was great and all, but it really was pushed a little too far. People keep complaining about how nowadays you can just "camp" in a corner and there's no way of getting rid of the "camper" without directly facing him... but then you tell me that just spamming a wall is more skillful? Wallbangs where you just spam through a wall are not skillful at all, you need to line up yourself and shoot. The alternative of taking the aim duel or using utility is more skillful in my opinion (as always you can elaborate on me as to why it was more skillful back then with the wallbanging ability).
-The movement is undoubtably better in 1.6 than in cs:go, no arguing there.
-I don't quite understand how the first bullet accuracy was better in 1.6 than in cs:go as so many make it out to be. I'll assume that there's some sort of trick, but then again for a perfect cs:go (which can be a very good game but with different mechanics) I'd suggest just having a perfect first bullet accuracy, and maybe a higher damage dropoff over range to balance it.
-flashbangs are awesome in 1.6, it really makes flashes very valuable. The smokes on the other hand are not strong enough, I think they're better in cs:go (although not perfect). The HE nades deal damage through the wall, which I kinda like as an idea. It also apparently allowed for some creative strats.
There are other things, but my point is not that I want to break down every single flaw 1.6 has. It's a great game, possibly better than cs:go in many aspects, and I understand that people love this game and thinks it's the best cs version of all time. I won't even disagree there, I can very well believe that, but there's 1 thing people keep forgetting. We as the community are suggesting changes in cs:go in order to create a better game, but some people just try to create another cs 1.6. Don't hate the game (and the people who love the game) for it not being cs 1.6, let it be it's own game. Take some of the aspects from 1.6 such as the movement and flashbangs (which I find great), sure, but don't try to enforce your will on this game so that it becomes somethings it simply is not. Cs:go has a lot of potential, it just is not maximized by Valve at all right now (and perhaps never, which is why you really should hate it).
But hey, this is just my opinion. If you don't agree, that's fine, but please write some sensible arguments and constructive criticism instead of "haha nice retard nub newfag silver 1". Thank you for reading.
15 years old kid talking about game mechanics :D Go back to school
Consider when the game was made, you probably wasn't even born yet.
1.6 was dope.
Best game ever.
80's and 90's boys will agree with me.
1.6 was a game changing scenario. Nothing similar will happen again, ever.
Why are yiu bringing up a game that has not been played competitively in years. 1.6 was awesome for its time
you are wrong! 1.6 ist the best game ever!!
1.6 DEAGLE >>>> csgo DEAGLE
CS 1.6 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>CSGO>>>>>>>>>>>>CSS
that explain a lot
he have 253 hours in 1.6 LOL
You're a BAD baiter though you gathered some hurt fellas down here.
what new kids know about 1.6, n0thing.
pubg > rocket league > overwatch > csgo > css > cs 1.6
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.