Thread has been deleted
Last comment
gun control cucks come here
Other plath - <3 wayLander 
how does an object kill people? someone explain me this. guns are alive?
2017-11-15 05:46
Canada Surzz 
cant tell if bait or just stupid.
2017-11-15 05:49
Probably bait
2017-11-15 06:06
this guy is literally the worst baiter on hltv
2017-11-15 06:33
Oh there's much worse
2017-11-15 06:33
Brazil iamXPRT 
he is correct bro hipocritinha :*
2017-11-15 10:29
United States Farrukh_M 
There are good arguments from both sides, but this is the worst bait I've ever seen.
2017-11-15 05:50
can't argue against point so says it's bait. LUL. guns = megatron?
2017-11-15 05:57
Ace | 
United States f00bar 
Ban assault trucks! No automatic transmissions! #IslamisPeace
2017-11-15 05:51
best argument possible: if a guy think its normal to kill people, he wont have a problem to get a gun, and shoot people, even being against the law =o so in terms of criminals, psycos etc, this law doesnt matter and dont affect anyone on the "good" side on the other hand.....
2017-11-15 05:52
Ace | 
United States f00bar 
That is a trash argument. You're poorly defining the purpose of the firearm to suit your argument. "If a guy has no problem poisoning people, he won't have a problem with antifreeze in his home"
2017-11-15 06:05
if u dont care, dont get a gun but the guy next to you have the right to get lets see if you agree after someone jump into your house, stole everything u worked hard to get, and beat da fuck out of you, cuz he know u wont be armed XD
2017-11-15 06:06
Ace | 
United States f00bar 
It's very hard to understand you. What side are you arguing for?
2017-11-15 06:08
expected from liquid fan.
2017-11-15 06:14
Ace | 
United States f00bar 
I'm retarded. Disregard my post.
2017-11-15 06:13
LUL dont worry, focus on cheer for steelega and liquid my friend "FUCK YEAH MAN!"
2017-11-15 06:14
Ace | 
United States f00bar 
I thought you were saying "Only people that think it's normal to kill people would own guns". It's late, brain half on
2017-11-15 06:16
I can see that =P will give you a pass because its late but next time I will have to call kng, so dont fuck up my friend
2017-11-15 06:18
Psychos getting guns is the problem. Also retards can get guns in USA and that leads to one toddler shooting per week plus so many accidents that they dont even make stats about em. Crazy 3 year old got a gun and murdered his brother. Well suits him for not having a gun. Normal people are pro gun control. Mentally challenged and mentally ill against it because they would lose their guns. Also people selling guns are opposed as crazy people apparently are such a large part of their sales.
2017-11-15 10:42
he might still be able to find gun, but lot harder..And lots of murders happens because of impulsive reaction, so added time in search for weapon will help cool things down..but anyway it doesnt really matter now,US ( guess we're talking about them ) is already flooded with weapons of all sort ,so gun control now would not give expected results
2017-11-15 06:59
you clearly dont know how criminals work crimes of impulsive reaction will probably happen anyway, like stupid kids drunking their asses off and beating other people etc criminals who are real criminals, that use crime as a way of living, survive, getting money etc, gun is almost like a work tool lol if the guy knows there no guns in a house for example, is like a free pass, thats the real deal, impulsive shit will happens no matter what, humans are stupid at least good citizens having guns they have a chance of defending themselfs, and the criminal will think better before jumping in example: you hear a guy jumping in your house, you scream you have a gun and shot 1time (not in the guy, random bullet) the guy will 120% sure run away, thats it, gg you are not killing people, but you are way more safe. imagine you have young kid, wife, etc, think about it a little bit lol
2017-11-15 07:03
crime will always be here, but i actually wouldnt risk my familiy by risking gun fight over some material shit..if it comes to that robber knows if i have gun or not, he will also know when house is empty...btw, gun control doesnt mean removing all guns, it means strict control of who can have gun and/or carry one...but like i said up, there is already too many guns around for any control to be effective
2017-11-15 07:18
you are not realizing stuff like: 3 guys can jump in your house, and rape your wife, and beat the shit out of everyone, or even kill for being too fucked up on cocaine or something if you are thinking "ok, rob me just dont hurt my family" the system already own your head fuck that, protect your family, your home dude, wtf!!!
2017-11-15 07:21
what fucking hollywood movie you live in? if 3 guys jump in my house , fucking gatling gun wouldnt be of much help if i cant reach it...anyway, use google..check countries with normal gun policy and numbers of "3 fucked up guys raping and pillaging other peoples homes"..on the other hand , some dude in financial, drug, gambilng or whatever problems, sold his perfectly legal firearm to a shady madafaka cause he need money fast...and that scenario times X....
2017-11-15 07:39
still, just dont buy a gun then. lol
2017-11-15 11:09
lol whats funny is that i do have a gun at home :)
2017-11-15 18:50
expected from kng fan
2017-11-15 18:51
2017-11-15 18:55
u arent believe u have a gun prove it or ill.....
2017-11-15 18:55
This is a poor argument because the element of surprise always favours the criminal. nobody is chilling at home with their wife and maybe kids watching tv with a gun on their lap. if the gangs real intent is to murder to get what they want you're fucked. also the biggest point youre forgetting is the criminal wouldnt (high chance) have a gun if they were illegal. making robberies ,revenge killings psycho shooters and hate crime etc far less likely. USA is 6 times bigger the uk but has 160 times more homicides. thats a ridiculous spike which can only be put down to guns freely accessible to idiots. our police rarely ever carry gun and shit never happens over here.
2017-11-15 08:00
America can never become as safe as uk tho because they already handed out the guns. cant repossess them all gg
2017-11-15 07:55
Russia leld 
"he wont have a problem to get a gun" maybe in coutries like brazil or usa
2017-11-15 10:21
Brazil iamXPRT 
fica dboa ai dilma kzcjskj aposto q tu votou no temer e mora no fundo da favela
2017-11-15 10:30
nah lol nt leftist, now go back to weed smoking and listen to haikaiss LMAOO
2017-11-15 11:11
Should everyone be able to own nukes? Objects can't kill people, after all. Maybe we all should be able to stroll down to the store and buy a nuke. ...Surely you agree. By your logic, you must
2017-11-15 05:56
i don't see why not. proliferation of nukes decreased the threat of armed warfare and nuclear warfare in the late 20th century. has there been a world since since ww2? that's because of MORE nukes. so you are inadvertently just making an argument for more guns. but you don't realise that cuz you don't think for yourself. you get told what to think and just repeat it LuL.
2017-11-15 06:02
That's in the context of states acting within semi-rational boundaries. With all the guns out there, the odds that a crazy person would own one are inevitable. The same would apply to increased ownership of nuclear weapons. Is a nuclear weapon being used randomly a mistake you are willing to risk for the freedom to own a nuke?
2017-11-15 06:05
if everybody had a gun, then the crazy people would get killed quick. how many people are crazy? you don't think 90% of people with a gun can handle 10% of people with a gun?
2017-11-15 06:06
you're dodging my argument
2017-11-15 06:07
crazy people being able to kill others is inevitable. it doesn't matter what weapon they use. it is not a reason to disarm a majority of sane and law-abiding people. that is the argument of an immature and irrational mind. just because you are not able to handle your irrational fear, that's no reason for society to infringe upon the right of it's citizens.
2017-11-15 06:14
the fear is very much rational. it matters what machines they use. guns are't puppies, they are machines designed to make the act of killing another person efficient. the more sophisticated the weapon, the simpler the task. we as a society need to decide how convenient and efficient we want to make the act of killing another person.
2017-11-15 06:47
that is the fear talking. imagine you put the world protect instead of kill. break the indoctrination to fear guns and you will be closer to the truth. "guns are't puppies, they are machines designed to make the act of protecting another person efficient. the more sophisticated the weapon, the simpler the task. we as a society need to decide how convenient and efficient we want to make the act of protecting another person."
2017-11-15 07:07
It's not fear talking, it's stone cold rationality. If you set aside the romantic ideal of a hero with a gun, from a purely mathematical standpoint, the harm guns cause far outweigh the benefits. If it is truly about protecting society, then the clear choice is heavy weaponry restrictions. Fear is what pushes people towards guns. The fear that they won't be able to carry themselves like a real man unless they own one. Ironically, our emotional dependency on guns to feel strong is the real weakness.
2017-11-15 07:22
2017-11-15 08:00
it is obviously not a mathematical standpoint because you can't count the amount of people saved by guns. only those which are killed. so you don't know the real benefits.
2017-11-15 10:13
United States Jammin800k 
So your logic is that we should just kill all the crazy people with guns to stop gun violence?
2017-11-15 10:45
Brazil Neegger 
kek because a fuckin nuke that can kill millions at once is comparable to a gun and yeah, give him a nuke, I wanna see him get a plane and crew to deploy it without getting spotted, what a fuckin retard
2017-11-15 06:17
you're taking this very literally. the autism is strong with this one
2017-11-15 06:43
nuclear firearms aren't restricted to atomic bombs.... and it is comparable. objective of both weapons is death
2017-11-15 08:02
Brazil Neegger 
Ban forks and knives
2017-11-15 16:30
equipment made to assist eat = equipment made to kill great logic smart guy.
2017-11-15 20:57
when people are this committed to being retarded, at a certain point you've gotta just get out of their way and let them have at it
2017-11-16 02:24
you got a point
2017-11-16 02:25
The funny thing is that this actually has a name: "Mutual assured destruction" Even more funny is that in these shootings that occasionally happen in the United States, occasionally the shooter is stopped by legal armed people with healthy minds, the gun, the truck or the knife are not responsible for the acts of sick minds. Intending my thoughts at times, I wonder if this was what the founding fathers thought of when they drafted the second amendment. Sorry for my bad english.
2017-11-15 06:12
The bait was pretty bad. But this post made it so extremely obvious. Kys pls
2017-11-15 10:35
shit analogy btw u got baited
2017-11-15 06:09
so did u
2017-11-15 06:42
10/10 save
2017-11-15 22:53
get baited twice
2017-11-16 02:20
another save
2017-11-16 04:46
India Ajatashatru 
+1 nice counter but it's a bait
2017-11-15 06:52
So dumb.
2017-11-15 06:00
Brazil Neegger 
damn right, fuck cucks, guns rule
2017-11-15 06:10
Gun control advocates are one of the most misinformed people ever. Despite virtually every study on gun control in the United States concluding that gun control is ineffective in significantly reducing crime rates and murder rates, they continue to push this perverse notion that more guns laws would result in fewer deaths. It's as if they forget that in almost every mass shooting, it's the good guy with the gun that stops them from taking more innocent lives.
2017-11-15 06:11
Don't really care about gun laws in the US but there's something very troubling about the Trumpsters and republicans in general; they do not seem to get the very simple fact that gun control is not gun ban. These low iq fuckwits completely lose their shit whenever gun control is mentioned, even when they can't even understand what it means.
2017-11-15 06:18
acting as if democrats and liberals don't see a total ban on guns as their end goal...
2017-11-15 06:24
That's because there are already a ton of gun control laws. Background checks, mentally unwell people are barred from owning guns, felons are prohibited from owning a gun, fully automatic rifles are banned, certain modifications to guns are already banned, non-citizens are not allowed to own guns, dishonorable discharged members of the Armed Forces are not allowed to own guns. Yet, despite all of this (and much more), many people are still calling for more gun control. More gun control at this point would be an outright ban on common guns. Not to mention the fact that many on the pro-gun control side would be in favor of an outright ban on guns.
2017-11-15 06:27
There are major differences between states and as a murican you should know that. What has been proposed have been in exactly in the lines of barring guns from people with background in crime or mental illness. Several states have not barred those. And the other proposition has been about assault rifles. As a murican you should be well aware that total gun ban is not what the democrats are after simply because it will never happen, it's the constitution, it's about control and certain limitations.
2017-11-15 06:32
Ace | 
United States f00bar 
No such thing as an "assault rifle" in civilian possesion
2017-11-15 06:36
Ace | 
United States f00bar 
The term itself is very unappealing. "Gun control" if you don't have control over it, how can you own it?
2017-11-15 06:32
2017-11-15 06:33
Ace | 
United States f00bar 
How can you own something you do not control? If you've transferred control of your firearms to the government, how can you realistically own them?
2017-11-15 06:34
United States pSilent This is you confirmed.
2017-11-15 06:30
United States quesoritobox 
people kill people, but the gun does a whole lot to help. can a person go on a mass killing spree with his hands? no. can he do it with a knife? no. moronic cuck
2017-11-15 06:33
you were almost there, but then you backtracked. very sad my friend. people are the problem, not guns.
2017-11-15 06:36
United States quesoritobox 
exactly, so make it harder for people to obtain guns, through background checks, mental illness tests. aka gun control?
2017-11-15 06:37
better idea: make open carry MANDATORY. we'll see how many mass shootings go into high figures when everybody has a gun...
2017-11-15 06:38
United States quesoritobox 
you insist people are the problem, so your solution is to give every person a gun?
2017-11-15 06:40
#12 fear of guns is infantile.
2017-11-15 06:45
United States quesoritobox 
you're naive if you think mandatory open carry would defuse conflict. To say crazy people will kill people regardless completely ignores the fact that crazy people won't be able to kill mass amounts of people if they can't easily get their hands on a semi-auto. Imagine the shitshow that would of occurred on top of amounts of deaths if every single person single person in that country concert in Las Vegas had a gun on them, open fire into absolute nothingness.
2017-11-15 06:52
if the whole crowd had had guns and were shooting towards him then maybe he would not have been able to kill so many people... firearm free zones = just an easy target.
2017-11-15 07:08
bad b8
2017-11-15 06:50
2017-11-15 06:59
we need to ban weapons and we need to ban big trucks from cities islam is pieceful religion u motherfuckers
2017-11-15 07:08
1967 - Jayne Mansfield is killed when her car runs under the rear end of a tractor trailer. Since then, all trailers have a DOT bar at the rear to keep cars from going under them. 1982 - Seven people die when Tylenol packaging was tampered with. Since then, it takes a PhD, channel locks, and a sharp object to get into a bottle of pills. 1995 A bombing using a certain kind of fertilizer, solution grade ammonium nitrate, killed 168 people, so the government imposed severe restrictions on the purchase of that fertilizer. How do objects like tractors, acetaminophen and fertilizer kill people? They don't. But measures need to be in place to prevent people from using them to harm others.
2017-11-15 07:28
Guns do kill but people kill even more ever thought of that.
2017-11-15 07:43
Laz | 
Japan Neion4ty7 
If strict gun control was ever to be implemented and be successful it should have been decades ago. If guns are banned now it's pointless since there are so many in circulation so criminals could easily obtain them illegally if they wanted, just now they don't have to worry about some brave civ shooting back. Of course reasonable rules and regulations need to be put in place and upheld.
2017-11-15 08:36
Cyprus Jardeet 
U can't shoot people of u don't have a gun
2017-11-15 10:25
2017-11-15 10:51
From my point of view its unbeleivable how we still have a conversation about this in almost 2018 . You just have to think for 10 seconds and to have an iq above 100 to realize that guns should be heavily restrcted for public purchase and there are absolutely no benefits at all and it only creates a vicious cycle of violence based on cowardness and iresponsability , especially in a 1st world 21 century country. But expected from a country who voted a guy like trump to take decisions for the world we live in. I mean you kinda get what you deserve... i'm glad i dont live in that mentally ill country called us but i feel really sorry for the many incredibly smart and competent people that live there and have to deal with this rooted barbarism
2017-11-16 02:42
But the us politicians are way too cowardly to actually take this decision for once and ban the guns . They are too afraid to lose the support of the 75iq fat joe from albaqurque who will never gonna vote him again if he cannot shot his sawed off every 2 days drunk in his backyard to show his kids and wife what a man he is.... its a pathetic shitshow this whole thing going on for decades and unfortunatelly is costing human lifes constantly and not very few of them.
2017-11-16 02:51
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.