"don't count gambit or big" - ok, I don't count all other teams too, why not? Gambit is the MAJOR CHAMPION, BIG scored 3-0 (!) in groups and you are telling that shit? If they won, then they deserve this
Yeah but LDLC isn’t a team anymore.
SK = top 1
fnatic= went into BIG slump, now grinding.
Gambit= Major champions
North = solid tier 2 team.
BIG = BO1 Legends
VP = Major champions, so legends.
Astralis = legendary team since TSM
then CSGO has no legendary teams at all then. People call teams legendary when they disband or something but miss understanding term boy.
SK are legends because they literally came from nothing to top1
VP is a legendary team because even when people always shitting on them, getting legendary spot in every major plus already won 1.
and so on, people calls LDLC or old fnatic legendary teams because they aren’t a team anymore, same will happen with these teams who are already legends : )
ez or still hard to understand? LOOL
Gambit well prepared and like VP was always good at LAN but generally, yes, they're alike.
But still they're not legends because a legendary team consists of legendary players, beside Zeus and maybe Dosia they didn't have any and now even Zeus gone.
Wow, what a wealthy vocabulary and solid AS A ROCK arguments.
I have just got literally nothing to say, you beat me so easily!
Oh, how I hate you, you'd only know. Absolute useless scrag in a skin. Get wise, dumb.
We're done here.
LDLC wins a major as “underdog” = LEGENDS
Gambit wins major as underdogs = No legends because they got no legendary players.
Nice logic there bro (I am lying btw because it is a stupid logic)
Do I have to say anything else?
I hope so, watching some of these games so far has been downright painful. Miss the old format already for some reason, doesn't feel like a major, but lets just wait till we are further into the major!