Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Moon landing never happend
 | 
Romania rainGODtop1 
prove me wrong
2018-02-03 12:00
#1
 | 
Romania rainGODtop1 
bump cuz Im right
2018-02-03 12:00
+1 nasa are a bunch of frauds youtube.com/watch?v=I3TE0CAXq_k
2018-02-03 17:25
pff, you believe in the moon ? nt nasa
2018-02-03 19:41
#3
kNgV- | 
Cyprus TANERTT 
Thats true
2018-02-03 12:01
#7
 | 
Romania rainGODtop1 
+200iq
2018-02-03 12:02
#4
JUGi | 
Germany Triggered 
prove it or I'll kill you
2018-02-03 12:01
#6
 | 
Romania rainGODtop1 
Search on google , im to good for HLTV
2018-02-03 12:01
#8
 | 
Canada hypsipyle 
its disrespectful to these guys who landed on moon they give effort, risk their lives risk being far away from their family and 1 retard (you) call oh they didnt land on moon .
2018-02-03 12:02
#9
 | 
Romania rainGODtop1 
Faze flair checks out
2018-02-03 12:03
#10
RpK | 
Morocco Onpoint 
they didn't
2018-02-03 12:03
#11
 | 
Romania rainGODtop1 
+200 iq
2018-02-03 12:04
#12
RpK | 
Morocco Onpoint 
that's very clear , the neil armstrong video shows that the american flag was mooving (cuz of air) although there is no air in the moon ..
2018-02-03 12:06
yo you should be like some kind of scientist. so smart
2018-02-03 12:08
#21
Xyp9x | 
Czech Republic Puget 
Armstrong was racing in tour de France on drugs, but even then a bicycle can't fly in the space. So it's all faked
2018-02-03 12:10
XD
2018-02-03 13:45
+1
2018-02-03 16:15
#64
ZywOo | 
France ZywHere 
I thought he was a musician, shit this guy is awesome, he can do whatever he wants :O
2018-02-03 16:16
they didn't land on moon rofl u mad bitch?
2018-02-03 12:10
#13
Australia anxy 
The burden of proof is on you, you made the claim so you have to back it up
2018-02-03 12:06
#18
 | 
Romania rainGODtop1 
nt
2018-02-03 12:09
ONLY if the moon landing has already been proven (not saying it has or hasn't been)
2018-02-03 16:54
2018-02-03 12:07
#23
Styx | 
Turkey Styyx 
Xdd
2018-02-03 12:11
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
2018-02-03 17:05
#22
 | 
Finland Kiisselimies 
Expected from faze fan
2018-02-03 12:11
#26
 | 
Romania rainGODtop1 
Expected from asia
2018-02-03 13:40
#42
 | 
Finland Kiisselimies 
Expected from poor guy
2018-02-03 15:46
stanley kubrick directed the moon landing scam.
2018-02-03 12:13
#27
 | 
Romania rainGODtop1 
+1
2018-02-03 13:40
#25
 | 
Turkey kochi3 
i love how to usa flag in the recording of the moon landing was defining physics as i seeming was moving like there was wind in space lul, there is no atmosphere in space like how was the flag moving like that????
2018-02-03 12:14
#28
 | 
Romania rainGODtop1 
Lol 200 iq
2018-02-03 13:41
#54
 | 
Germany maestroCS 
Ever noticed that the flag doesn't look like it's moving on the top end? That's because there's a stick in it so the flag doesn't hang down.
2018-02-03 16:04
#29
 | 
Denmark Poopoohead123 
moon map in csgo confirmed?!?!?
2018-02-03 13:43
#30
 | 
Romania rainGODtop1 
De_nasa_hoax
2018-02-03 13:43
#32
smooya | 
United Kingdom trtr098 
In the original moon landing video/photo, there were no stars in the background while the earth is clearly visible. I've talked to physics undergraduates and none of them can offer me an explanation. Unless someone can explain this phenomenon I cannot fully convince myself moon landing is real
2018-02-03 13:47
#33
 | 
Romania rainGODtop1 
de_usa_hoax
2018-02-03 13:50
#59
 | 
Germany maestroCS 
Not a single star can be seen on the photographs. But there is an explanation. The astronauts and the lunar surface are very bright due to the sunlight. The stars, on the other hand, shine only weakly. In order to capture the astronauts on film, a very short exposure time is required to prevent them and the moon's surface from being overexposed. For this reason, the pictures of the ISS and other photos from the space stars are still not available. If you want to make them visible, you need a very long exposure time.
2018-02-03 16:11
#65
ZywOo | 
France ZywHere 
+1 aske a scientist about science, ask a photographer about picture :)
2018-02-03 16:21
This does make some sense, but I thought since there's no atmosphere on the moon, the light from the starts wont be scattered (twinkle) but also less would be absorbed, so it should be perceived as a very bright and sharp dots
2018-02-03 19:40
Worry about hoaxes in your country, like the biggest hoax ever, "All Bulgarians say they use deodorant." MOTHERFUCKING LIES!!!
2018-02-03 13:52
LOL U FUCKING MAD THANKS FOR THE LAUGH ANYWAY AHAHAH
2018-02-03 17:04
#35
 | 
Germany VeryNiceGuy 
USA just faked it to stay relevant Have a nice day! -VeryNiceGuy
2018-02-03 13:56
ez proof youtu.be/fNffdIWBbgo \close
2018-02-03 13:59
#37
 | 
Germany PhoenixD!!! 
rainGODtop1 is a donkey fucker prove me wrong
2018-02-03 14:00
cant disprove science
2018-02-03 14:48
+1
2018-02-04 01:51
#38
forsaken | 
Finland xore1 
you need to prove that its was staged
2018-02-03 14:03
No. When you are claiming something, you need proof. USA claims they had landed on the moon, yet they can't provide undeniable proof. How am I supposed to disprove something, when there isn't even clear evidence suggesting that the moon landing actually took place? Example for peanut brains: I just ate a whole jar of nutella in 30 minutes. Sorry, I can't link you a video of me eating that jar because I didn't record it. Now prove me, that I did not empty the whole jar. Get my point?
2018-02-03 14:56
+1
2018-02-03 15:52
This is pretty flawed. OP literally claimed 'Moon landing never happend' and you said 'When you are claiming something, you need proof.'. However you disagreed with someone claiming the OP should prove it: 'you need to prove that its was staged' by saying 'No.'.
2018-02-03 16:01
#67
2018-02-03 16:27
Not entirely sure why you redirected me to a post that doesn't answer what I said.
2018-02-03 22:37
Ya, sorry if my written English is not that great, but I am pretty sure that "I don't have undeniable proof for either site, but the original claim has to be justified before you can start criticizing the opposition when you don't even have the proof FOR the moon landing yourself." is also referring to your post. Also, OP didn't claim something, he doubted something. He gave a response to the NASA claim ("We've been to the moon"), stating his opinion on the topic. Ofc you can say "I don't share your opinion", but why would he have to prove his opinion when the matter he is referring to is not even proved in the first place? Take my peanut breain example once again: Why would someone have to prove that I did not eat a full jar of nutella in 30min, even though I can not provide evidence that I actually did? Since English is a foreign language to me, I am surely not mastering it, but I hope you can understand the logic behind what I am trying to say. If anything is not clear or if you disagree, just answer mate.
2018-02-03 23:27
I see what you mean and I appreciate you taking the time to write this. The English that I see in front of me seems quite sound. I can see the moon landing's 'proof' not being seen as absolute proof, however in a sense they have given some proof whether it is actually believed or not. I get what you mean saying that OP only doubted something, but I personally think that if NASA has claimed something and given what they deem to be proof then saying it is false sounds like a claim on its own to me. I personally don't have too much of an opinion on the matter at hand to be fair, I just wasn't sure if I agreed that the proof should solely come from one side when there has been 'some' evidence. I don't know if that makes sense?
2018-02-04 01:43
I am just a very logically thinking guy, and I feel like it is in my very own nature to not believe in anything unless I am 100% certain that a certain claim is right. Therefore I am just not religious (as in believing into "the god" - maybe there are human creators out there, but as long as I don't have proof (which I will most likely never get), I won't just blindly believe into what the Bible, Quran etc. tells me)). Same about cheaters in CS, there is no proof half of the pro scene is cheating, but because of many fishy clips I won't go out and tell everyone: "CS pro scene is free of cheaters." I don't know, I will most likely never know, so I won't spread propaganda (if you will), suggesting the accusation is justified or not. About the proof NASA has given regarding the moon landing: I can only repeat what I wrote in #67. And since the proof is actually not flawless (imo), any arguments regarding this very claim "We have been to the moon." are not considered claims, but arguments, debates, opinions, doubts, whatever, regarding the NASA claim. Idk, that is just the way I think about language. And the justification for those arguments, debates, opinions, doubts, whatever, is the fact, that the evidence provided by NASA has so many flaws. So logically, I see it that way: >NASA has given "proof". >Some of the proof leaves open questions/can't be supported by our knowledge regarding science/just overall appers to be suspicious. >I am doubting the "proof" >As long as I don't get more proof, I won't blindly believe into what NASA is saying >It's their turn to provide me with proof, because I am not claiming anything, I am in doubt ( see the "2nd >"). I hope that makes sense. If you read all of this, thank you very much.
2018-02-04 02:18
#55
 | 
Germany maestroCS 
There's photos of it? If you say the photos are a fake you have the burden of proof again as you made the claim that the photo's arent real.
2018-02-03 16:05
Best way to prove, that the moon landing did happen is to show evidence that you can actually see the US flag from earth via telescopes, because scientists claim thats possible. Now, that is the best picture out there: i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/uploa.. This looks so ridiculous to me, how can this even be considered UNDENIABLE proof? A few grey and black spots on a map that looks totally weird in the first place. Pictures taken on the moon by the astronauts themselves have so many flaws, I don't wanna get into detail (you can watch some hour long videos on yt if you really want to, I did some time ago), so those can't be considered undeniable proof either (imo!). I am not saying that the moon landing was fake, I don't have undeniable proof for either site, but the original claim has to be justified before you can start criticizing the opposition when you don't even have the proof FOR the moon landing yourself.
2018-02-03 16:27
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_rock#/media/F.. i thought germans were smart enough, go back to making cars this is not your thing
2018-02-03 16:13
Undeniable proof this rock is actually moon material? Wikipedia is the most unreliable source in the internet, you should have learned that in school.
2018-02-03 16:28
go where this rock is being held and find out yourself by doing a scientific research, if you don't want to then it's your fault
2018-02-03 16:31
Quoting wikipedia, your own source: "Moon rocks on Earth come from three sources: those collected by the US Apollo manned lunar landings from 1969 to 1972; samples returned by three Soviet Luna unmanned probes in the 1970s; and rocks that were ejected naturally from the lunar surface by cratering events and subsequently fell to Earth as lunar meteorites." So this rock, if it was moon material, does not suggest people landed on the moon. Unmanned missions are another thing, but this topic is about the human moon landing.
2018-02-03 16:49
read your own quote jesus mate ''Moon rocks on Earth come from three sources: those collected by the US Apollo manned lunar landings from 1969 to 1972'' and the description under the photo i put says the rock was obtained in the mission Apollo 15 which was one of the several successful moon landing manned missions en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_15
2018-02-03 17:09
read your own quote of a quote jesus mate "from three sources" Undeniable proof this rock is from that certain landing? Oh, wikipedia says so.
2018-02-03 17:22
as i said, go to their facilities and find out yourself
2018-02-03 17:59
proof it didn't happen
2018-02-03 15:55
First you have to prove it happened.Proofs that NASA landed on the moon are quite poor.
2018-02-03 15:56
who said i have to proof it first? you have to make the first step
2018-02-03 15:58
"No. When you are claiming something, you need proof."
2018-02-03 15:58
proof that it didnt happen then mr "I claim we never visited the moon"
2018-02-03 17:19
#100
REAL | 
Norway duffz00r 
If you search and read, you'll find that theres proof. Even Russia says that.
2018-02-03 17:26
The burden of proof is on the person making the claim btw. Also nice b8. 3/10
2018-02-03 16:00
the chances of USA faking shit to win the space race instead landing on the moon, and after all the weird stuff and questions you discover after doing proper research, is very big imo.
2018-02-03 16:07
#72
 | 
Romania rainGODtop1 
ok
2018-02-03 16:32
The union has many more achievements in space, so here we won )0
2018-02-03 16:35
Those shit you're talking about, are you sober? or is it just after you make conspiracy with your boyfriend?
2018-02-03 16:06
#74
 | 
Romania rainGODtop1 
yes
2018-02-03 16:32
NASA has travelled to the moon not only one time, but more than 4 times (6 i think) its an obvious bait but im sure a few people here still think it hasn't happened
2018-02-03 16:09
#73
 | 
Romania rainGODtop1 
nt
2018-02-03 16:32
1. LRO photos of landing sites. They even photographed russian landers on the surface of the moon. 2. Apollo astronauts set up some kind of mirrors on the surface so we can use lasers to measure distance etc. - because of that we know that moon is moving away from earth and in the distant future there'll be no solar eclipses. Laser beam will not reflect from dusty moon surface, so they needed to set up some mirrors. 3. Thing about black space without stars - There is still very bright sun on the sky and you have to set short exposure on camera in order to get good pictures of objects, because otherwise you would see only bright s**t. But wait, they made photos of earth with stars visible in the background from moon with long exposure in UV spectrum - but you have to check internet for yourself and listen to some flat-earthers who will show you some edited photo and say "Look, there's no stars, it's fake". And position of stars on these UV photos matches what we see on the sky. And more and more and more of this.
2018-02-03 16:25
#77
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
Bad bait... If you want to have fun, there are better and more intelligent ways to do so, friend. No need to risk your account just to have fun, dude. Have a good day.
2018-02-03 16:36
Earth is flat
2018-02-03 16:52
#91
 | 
Romania rainGODtop1 
Earth flat community has memebers all over the globe
2018-02-03 17:20
Ur brainwashed niBBa. How are we standing on earth without falling ? Dumbass scientists said that earth rotates at 1600 kph which is bullshit because he would never be able to stand up. Earth is flat and that is a fact. /closed
2018-02-03 17:22
#97
 | 
Romania rainGODtop1 
/opend yes /e
2018-02-03 17:23
I find the moon landing very sketchy, but can't argue with the fact that there are man-made reflectors on the moon surface
2018-02-03 17:02
#92
 | 
Romania rainGODtop1 
Ok
2018-02-03 17:20
Man landing in moon actually happened, and many times, i agree, but, that day at 1969 didnt happen, USA government were buying time, they didnt had the technology at the time like URSS
2018-02-03 17:09
#93
 | 
Romania rainGODtop1 
+1
2018-02-03 17:20
3/8
2018-02-03 17:22
#98
 | 
Romania rainGODtop1 
This is weak bait,i've baited 1k with those stickers xd
2018-02-03 17:23
I feel sorry for people who believe that you can fly somewhere on this: nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/image/ap11..
2018-02-03 17:26
#105
 | 
Romania rainGODtop1 
ez
2018-02-03 19:41
#107
 | 
Denmark TurboHenning 
Are you actually for real? Jesus fucking christ, you sure as fuck is an idiot mate. huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/11-proofs-tha.. Read this you fucking stupid fuck. Almost feel sorry for you.
2018-02-03 19:53
earth is flat btw
2018-02-04 01:46
#112
 | 
Brazil ftf123 
real question is why in 2k18 we dont have stars photos from moon perspective.
2018-02-04 01:49
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.