Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Liberals have high IQs but
Europe ApziIsKing 
Liberals have high IQs but they don't succeed in life (Conservatives succeed better). Why is that? Because conservatives realize that only hard work, not dreaming will get you far in life. I would like to compare liberals to Ancient Greeks while I'd compare conservatives to Ancient Romans. The Greeks were typical leftist liberals, they were Dreamers, philosophers, mathematicians etc. They were educated but also programmed to think in a certain way. They contributed a lot to science. The Romans were practical. They built really beautiful and big buildings that still stand today, they successfully governed a huge state for the standards of that time, they won a lot of wars, they built a big empire, they were truly mighty. So, although the Ancient Greeks were more intelligent and created more science, the Romans and the Roman Empire succeeded better because they were practical and used common sense. Dreaming will only get you so far.
2018-03-13 16:09
bump
2018-03-13 16:13
Nice comparison with the Greeks and the Romans - however I strongly disagree with your criteria of success. Winning a war is something you do if diplomacy failed. Building a big empire.... well both Caesar and Kim Yong Un and a lot of other dictators did that... not very successful IMO. Making money for myself is only part success. I think it would be more relevant to look at other value drivers than winning wars and earning money. Inventing stuff that creates prosperity or wealth to the world - now THAT is success..! Happiness is success. Creating a country where the right balance between capitalism and socialism is success. This is why the majority of the richest nations are social democracies - and also have a majority of the happiest people.
2018-09-10 19:57
Roman Empire wasn't successful? I beg to differ. commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Roman_Em..
2018-09-10 20:01
he mad cuz his country wasn't part of the roman empire.
2018-09-10 20:02
What are your value drivers for claiming it a success..? Winning wars? It was a brutal empire based on slavery, wars, killing - their wealth came from plundering and slavery.
2018-09-10 20:24
Btw - not saying they didn't achieve anything successful - they absolutely did. Just saying that an Empire based on war and slavery would be shameful to call a success, unless you have very poor morale.
2018-09-10 20:33
are u trolling or are you seriously this heavily brainwashed. the self-censorship and compartmentalisation of thoughts is real. this generation is doomed.
2018-09-10 20:41
+1
2018-09-11 06:27
liberals are stupid, look they already destroyed world with democracy
2018-03-13 16:14
if u really thought about this u would recognize that actually the non-democratic governments destroy the world
2018-03-13 16:26
mad cuz rightists better
2018-03-13 16:27
More like superior cuz rightists narrow minded Im not leftist btw
2018-03-13 16:44
then what are you? oh wait you libtards also created new sides just like your imaginary genders.
2018-03-14 19:48
#38
 | 
Lithuania YungDavid 
HAHAHAHHAHAH +11111111
2018-03-14 19:49
Lul rekt
2018-03-14 22:15
given ur argumentation theres only leftist and rightist and thats literally the dumbest shit ive seen in a while tbh didnt expect much more from a brit
2018-03-14 23:29
lmao
2018-09-10 20:06
#44
 | 
Finland TuureBoelius 
why not support left? left means support for equality, free education and other good things
2018-03-14 22:18
Because people are not equal, therefore to create forced equality you need to subjugate other peoples freedoms. But in doing that you created two groups: the ones that force "equality" upon others and the ones subjugated, which turns the pursuit for equality a self-defeating and hypocritical power trip. The one and only equality which is not self-defeating is the formal "classic liberal" equality before the law. And thats that.
2018-09-10 21:03
u got rekt m8
2018-03-14 22:39
u got rekt m8 edit: oops replied to wrong guy
2018-03-14 22:39
#68
 | 
Sweden New@ac@low@id 
ahahahahaha nazi fuck low class shit go back to your factory scum
2018-09-10 21:36
this kinda makes sense, but the reason why you say liberals are less successful is because their supporters usually make less money right? that's because they only support them because liberals offer more benefits than conservatives to people who make less money. decent comparison though, although both empires failed. maybe that's a foreshadow to the future...
2018-03-13 16:16
I'm feeling thank you
2018-03-13 16:17
#69
 | 
Sweden New@ac@low@id 
lol
2018-09-10 21:36
liberals are not leftist both are low iq and possibly down syndrome, most are low t only high iq are mls and ancoms (not antifa! - theyre fake leftists, liberal gay propaganda spies)
2018-03-13 16:18
lool nt commie
2018-03-13 17:54
its not a try, its a confirmed successful truth, the only time you can be non-leftist and high iq is if youre an evil fuck
2018-03-13 17:55
Oh yes this is very true indeed although u dont have to be far left wing
2018-03-13 21:23
true
2018-03-14 19:45
Nice thread, I really like to read about theoretical explenations for evolutionary progress.
2018-03-13 16:21
I'm feeling thank you
2018-03-13 16:28
Anybody that binds themselves to a political group doesn’t have a higher than average IQ.
2018-03-13 16:21
t. XD POLITICS ARE FOR NERDS AMIRITE
2018-03-13 16:23
No, saying that you agree with one side of the political spectrum all the time is ignorant.
2018-03-13 16:24
so actually believing in something is ignorant? centrist detected
2018-03-13 16:25
I guarantee you that if yor pay attention to every political arguement you won’t be on the same side every time.
2018-03-13 16:26
that doesnt mean you dont have your certain place that you believe in more than the other side even though you dont agree with everything
2018-03-13 16:29
I think saying you’re a liberal, conservative, libertarian or the like is misreprestarive of what you actually believe. It’s good enough for debates and identifying who ‘you’re with’, but doesn’t explain the context about you.
2018-03-13 16:31
sure, fair enough, however the core ideas you represent and believe in stay the same, just because you dont agree with a thing or two doesnt make you a liberal at one moment and conservative at the other, its irrelevant in the bigger picture (me being a hardcore leftist yet completely disagreeing with sjw/pc culture, acceptance of gender, nadanadanada - just extreme examples of being something most people in my circles would be for)
2018-03-13 16:35
Agreed not voting makes me the smartest
2018-03-13 16:27
When did I say that?
2018-03-13 16:29
"Anybody that binds themselves to a political group doesn’t have a higher than average IQ." When you vote you bind your support to a party ?
2018-03-13 16:30
Binding yourself to a party as in the thought process of ‘well, I’m a liberal, so this is what I agree with because that’s what other liberals agree with’.
2018-03-13 16:32
Ok you should not blindly follow ideology's i understand what you are saying now.
2018-03-13 16:34
that's identity politics
2018-03-13 17:28
#31
Ace | 
United States f00bar 
No one said anything about agreeing with dogma 100% of the time but you. If you identify as "right wing" or "left wing", that means you will generally agree with the positions that follow from those wings most of the time.
2018-03-13 17:59
No one said anything about agreeing with dogma 100% of the time but you. If you identify as "right wing" or "left wing", that means you will generally agree with the positions that follow from those wings most of the time.
2018-03-14 15:41
+1
2018-03-13 16:22
liberals have high iqs but.. marx was right
2018-03-13 16:29
marx was idiot
2018-04-22 15:58
#24
 | 
Czech Republic davskal 
the rome greece comparison was great, but it doesn't apply today... most of the liberals are not scientists studying, they are artists.
2018-03-13 16:34
#32
Ace | 
United States f00bar 
+1
2018-03-13 18:02
#28
 | 
Israel PapaObama 
ok
2018-03-13 17:33
ok
2018-03-14 22:13
leftists/libtards are cowards of highest order. They are too coward to stand up against anything wrong or accept the facts. In contrary they surrender to it and then use their intellectualism to hide their cowardice by defending the wrong like islam, feminism etc. So they are not intellectual, but appear to be coz over the time they have mastered the art of propaganda, falsehood and deceit through various means as they are only capable of this.
2018-03-13 18:28
#40
 | 
Lithuania YungDavid 
+1
2018-03-14 19:50
#39
 | 
Lithuania YungDavid 
So true thats the High IQ HLTV i want
2018-03-14 19:49
thank you !
2018-03-14 22:04
Hard work :D Way to be a slave for someone else. Just run a business, make others do the work and get rich.
2018-09-10 20:02
What if you're hard working liberal? Or does working hard make you conservative. Woke
2018-09-10 20:03
liberals have peanut brain lol
2018-09-10 20:05
Liberalism can works with conservatism if you dont know Whats mean your state is irrelevant
2018-09-10 20:13
What people have in mind is the currenct acception of the term "liberalism" which bascially equates to the social-democratic/progressive estabilishment of the american democratic party. If you want a liberalism that can be coupled with conservative values you should use the term libertarianism or at least classic liberalism so people dont get confused.
2018-09-10 21:02
Libertarianism is offshot of liberalism. Liberalism rn is very wide contain both right and left ideas, no matter what (except ultraright ideas): capitalism, democracy, conservative, liberty, etc. What means its a perfect idealogy for those who cant read anything tougher than Atlas Shrugged (dunno), dont know the theory of both wings and thinking that there is some way to seat on both chairs (democracity and capitalism). Cant say american democratic party somehow linking with progressive in practice. Both conservative (republicans more than others but still).
2018-09-10 21:17
Not actually, liberalism of nowadays is socialism adapted to the american mentality, which was very closed to the term itself so they had to resort to this (powerful) semantic trick and at the same time depriving a rival idelology of its term and (deliberately) sowing confusion. By the way the democratic party, which once stood for free trade and liberty, was hijacked by Millian socialists at the end of the nineteenth century. Like it or not libertarianism is the new brand for classic liberalism, and not all libertarians are Randians or Rothbardians.
2018-09-10 21:23
Free markted and fair trade/rivalry died after Great Depression. Anyway I agree with you about liberalism is adapted version of socialism for majority. Since communism has very bad reputation after all those fails and propaganda, and socialism cant be reliased in this or next generation, modern society need some left-wing progressive route even if it fake-like, only just to make opposition to right-wing conservatism.
2018-09-10 21:34
i don't subscribe to the idea that liberals have higher iqs. i mean we see them all the time on hltv, they don't seem particularly bright at all. probably fake news.
2018-09-10 20:43
#61
 | 
Cyprus Swishh_ 
same goes with conservatives however, both sides seem to have low iq
2018-09-10 20:55
#64
 | 
World ///fuck 
This is racist
2018-09-10 21:11
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.