I will reply here to the replies from above because my broken phone can't actually process such long HTML post-to-post standard and it will calculate its DOM place outside the screen.
First of all your demeaning strategy in which you pretend to be a 14 years old kid while your real age is 25 will just reflect your incapability to handle an ordinary dispute at the level of your age. So in order to not look like a 25 years old psycho you showed on this forum as being 14.
It's a totally immature action that implies insecurity and self disrespect do to the fact that you've elect to adopt the image of a 14 years old boy - results in how uncomfortable you are when the matter points towards your own persona.
The reply #56 is such a bullshit and as this message goes forward I'll explain why. Also I will not quote you again because the understanding of a context quote is very limited for yourself, so I prefer to eliminate all the information on which your brain will get stuck and fume.
You're struggling to understand the meaning of a totally basic proposition with a trivial context and meaning - yes, we're talking about the message that was originally posted in reply #47.
All the context was related to the meaning of your previous message which automatically puts me in the position to mention the word "grammar" if I'll want to point out the grammatical mistakes. As I obviously didn't say anything about your grammar the meaning of my reply will just relate to your previous message - obviously shocking.
As a result - making assumptions when you have all the informations on the plate is completely stupid and it shows your inability to perceive simple verbal logical constructions.
Now you're lying by calling me a liar which is a typical behaviour for frustrated teenagers. In the first place you're saying that you haven't been aggressive and it was all my assumption and than, in the second place you're stating that you never said that you haven't been aggressive. What is this bullshit? You're even asking for proof which is hilarious because it can be found in reply #53. Also, do not try to turn this around by pointing the fact that you referred to your "tone" only, because an aggressive tone is still an act of aggression.
Now we finished with this silly bullshit - guess that we're moving up to the next one xD.
You've asked to link you the statements in which you've asked me to provide some arguments. In many of your replies you've said that I didn't provide any arguments to sustain my previous main reply, this being an indirect mention that basically says that you're waiting for one for the sake of validity from our discussion.
You're using the ad litteram method in order to analyse the messages which is a completely wrong approach do to the fact that in most of the cases the requests or suggestions will be understood without further explanations. It's quite disturbing and makes me question my human existence thinking that there truly exists a reality in which people like you cannot process the most basic form of communication.
As much as I've expected, you're indeed frustrated to acknowledge the truth about your libidinous behaviour that resulted from the fact that you tried to gain attention and help from other people when the situation got out of control. You call this as being "my assumption" because it cannot be pointed right away like an object but deduced from the sum of those events logic and common sense.
You aren't smart enough to fool everybody even though you hardly try to believe so.
You aren't any different from the usual HLTV trolls who're assuming the untrue in almost every situation it feels like, because a simple understanding of a message may pay too high of a price when it comes to use their brain.
You're assuming that I feel like someone special on this forum and that I put care on my "image" (don't know why we're talking about personal internet image but fair enough) which is completely untrue. I do not care about what people say and think about me, especially online, because this is an environment that adds no value to the outcomes that take part in my real life (outside virtuality).
It is funny to observe how this matter evolved because it can clearly be deduced the fact that you do really care about your image on this forum - a deduction based on the even in which you cried for help to other users.
My reputation is simply inexistent on this forum since there's no counter that memorise my actions. There are only assumptions and opinions made by people who have a bit of positive or negative care for my words.
You keep trying to imply the nonsense that suggest something about the existence of a dispute between us, a "battle" that in your mind was taken as a win. It is such a ridiculous statement to make or a thought to have because it simply has nothing to do with reality do to the fact that there was no dispute from the beginning.
How can be a dispute when the reply from which the dispute should start is false from the beginning? You didn't even have the chance to turn our "discussion" into a dispute because you lost in making valid points that have the potential to sustain a fight for arguments - as a result, you lost the battle with yourself leaving me no one to defeat.
Regarding the main (primary) subject:
Even though I've said that I'll not quote you again, for the sake of understanding the matter I will do a miserable quote => "Those who cry are the ones who cheat half of situations and the other half are those who suck and can't deal with better players and admit they're not invincible gods in game, either way they're awful people."
Basically you just categorised the people who are crying in this game in two halves - the ones who suck and the ones who cheat. This is a completely invalid statement to make do to its simplicity that's addressed to a very complex subject. It doesn't matter the situation we are talking about, people are very complex in their behaviour - this being a very solid reason to claim your statement as false.
But letting the complexities aside, I can give you a simple example that will dispel your statement:
- Imagine in a 5 vs 5 FaceIT match a player starts to play his game incredibly well, winning allot of rounds by himself and then, in a specific moment he'll start to rage because he died because of timing or maybe because of a lucky air shot, or maybe because he simply do not like to be fragged in game even though he is batter than anyone on the server.
It's not about the idea that you're bad at the game but the fact that you do not have a correct mindset while playing the game.
Usually I feel a bit of sorry for some individuals that refuse to think logically before posting something that might be wrong, but for you...I feel happiness for the fact that you got destroyed, embarrassed and thrown into a lake of shame in which it seams that you've drown already.