Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Xizt to fnatic, options
rain | 
Lithuania LevelUpp 
Tell me what would've been a better option for fnatic and why
2018-05-27 06:58
anyone from any team /close
2018-05-27 07:00
#2
rain | 
Lithuania LevelUpp 
That's not true at all, cmon bruh, he's not THAT bad
2018-05-27 07:03
the problem is not taking xizt, it is benching lekr0
2018-05-27 07:05
#6
 | 
Argentina FabriConti 
I think the org knew that replacing Golden right of the bat would be unpopular, due to past rumors and the fact that they won IEM Katowice and WESG (kinda irrelevant) with him IGLing, so they benched a less popular player (lekr0) and let Golden just do bad in another role so they can kick him due to poor perfomance in the future and use lekr0 again.
2018-05-27 07:09
#8
rain | 
Lithuania LevelUpp 
Removing golden would've made the turks happy, and noone unhappy. Removing Lekr0 made noone happy, and everyone unhappy. Logic?
2018-05-27 07:13
#4
KRIMZ | 
Denmark slacking 
Xizt to fnatic is good. They are just.removing the wrong player. Hopefully -golden - jw + lekr0 + twist soon
2018-05-27 07:06
#5
United States hdz` 
i think the lekro bench had to be a business choice, no one wants to buy golden out from them...some teams could be looking to buy lekro from them, so it makes more money for signing xizt
2018-05-27 07:08
#7
rain | 
Lithuania LevelUpp 
That won't happen, they got rid of lekr0 cuz of internal problems, they won't bring him back cuz of said problems. Now -golden +twist is more likely.
2018-05-27 07:10
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.