Thread has been deleted
Last comment
ww2 best army?
Lithuania Ayaiaiai 
who had the best army in ww2. Imo it was the Finns since they beat everyone and nobody invaded them.
2018-05-27 20:36
Finnish
2018-05-27 20:37
+1
2018-05-27 21:46
Hi friends I work in my dads company buying and selling stocks currently leading a division with 20 people and the business is going really good. Im living in Amsterdam and have quite a wild lifestyle. Doing drugs and going out atleast 4 night a week. Everytime i get alcohol in my system i change. I have no control over myself the alcohol turns me into a predator and im always looking for girls to bring back home to fuck. I fucked around 250 different girls from farm daughters to high paid models ive done them all and i feel dirty. Im addicted to sex drugs & alcohol.. Anyone got tips how i can change my life. For some of you i am leaving the dream but i can tell you this is not what you want! I need help
2018-05-30 12:23
Thanks to many Norwegians.
2018-05-27 23:23
They gave like 1000-5000 men (volunteers) and some weaponary for Finland veri nice
2018-05-28 10:35
Sweden had 8000 volunteers in the Finnish army
2018-05-29 18:07
Yep and norway gave less so basicly nothing
2018-05-29 18:33
I watch unkown soldier this weeekend Good movie but 3 hr maybe little long Axaxaxa
2018-05-28 07:29
wtf!! i watched the same movie at Friday. But i didnt watch the end of movie. First 2 hours was great with action scene i didnt like the drama in the end then closed it.
2018-05-28 19:05
end is like a save in csgo 1v5 LUL axaxaxaxa
2018-05-28 19:09
that old soldier was the great entry fragger his support nading then he rushes it :)
2018-05-28 19:09
old soldier is little bit psycho lul have woman and children but killing people like terminator yea axaxa
2018-05-28 19:10
ayye spoiler alert maybe ? but good description of the ending lmao
2018-05-29 15:52
+1 Simo Häyhä Best AWPer of 1940 #1 in HLTV
2018-05-28 17:58
#192
JD | 
Poland chujwto 
Gabriel "White Death" Toledo
2018-05-28 18:44
with love from vassili zaitsev
2018-05-28 19:05
tree camping needed to get banned
2018-05-28 23:22
#417
World k0k 
Vasilij Zajcev better brooooooo
2018-05-31 08:59
+1
2018-05-28 20:50
#336
 | 
Iran Xanbibi 
-1 You cant say they were the best because they never lost, they were just not as important as the west front in europe if the Countries actaully gave flying fuck about the north it would have been theres. German Army was the best at the start of the war US had it at the end.
2018-05-29 16:10
#3
Boom | 
France mbl4 
The finns were like: try to invade us, we will rekt your ass on ski
2018-05-27 20:37
Highjacking this comment there were many documents by germans stating that they feared brazillians back then (italy campaign) they commonly described them as cannibals and savages Serious note: I think the badass army were hungarians (iirc), even the worst SS troops feared them, the most cruel for sure
2018-05-28 02:48
#247
 | 
Poland HTMFS 
Actually historical fact. Hungarian army who was send to fight against Uprising in Warsaw, helped citizen of Warsaw, also they communicate with Polish Officers tell them where they gonna be and said if no one gonna attack them they gonna pretending they don't see any Poles.
2018-05-28 20:27
#4
 | 
Myanmar xdavidlm 
Germany had the best army. But too many enemies.
2018-05-27 20:38
German army after 1942 wasnt the same. It was basically fresh recruits since 2/3 of veterans died or were wounded in combat.
2018-05-27 20:42
USA had nukes,they got them in 1945 and could defiantly "survive" to 1945 against every army
2018-05-27 20:45
they only had like a couple nukes. and nukes back then weren't THAT powerful unlike todays hydrogen nukes plus they had to be delivered by slow airplanes. the soviets had like 10x the army the US had in europe.
2018-05-27 20:48
if you hit a strategic point with THAT bomb,the war is over
2018-05-27 20:49
The ww2 nukes only entered the war late and were defently not as powerfull as The Tsar bomb for exemple
2018-05-27 22:33
powerful enough to kill 200 thousand people in japan lmfao
2018-05-28 07:36
rofl +1
2018-05-28 19:08
#330
 | 
Azerbaijan kvestinmak 
ROFL
2018-05-29 15:51
#21
 | 
Yugoslavia plsnopermaban 
relatively speaking, no they were not as powerful as today's nukes. but you have to remember that even the weakest nuclear weapon is enough to delete a city from a map - which is terrifying. if NYC was nuked, that's 8.5 mil people gone. Chicago, 2,7 mil. In comparison, in WW1 abouy 16 mil died.
2018-05-27 20:51
you do know that half of the population of both cities survived the attack? many did suffer radiation burns but they were relatively less severe.
2018-05-27 20:55
#26
 | 
Yugoslavia plsnopermaban 
Okay, yes, you are correct - I did not fact check appropriately. That still does not move me from the point that Germany and Japan would not have attempted a mainland invasion of the USA.
2018-05-27 20:58
nobody would ever do this lol. there is no way any army could have invaded the Usa.
2018-05-27 20:59
If germany ruled europe + africa and japan ruled asia they would have rushed usa for sure. Not even many germans and japs needed E: iirc the american natives had 500k soldiers already in the us and would have fought at the german side aswell since they are aryan by the german raceideology
2018-05-28 18:39
#33
 | 
United States Trump2020KAG 
dont forget san fran and LA....liberals be gone
2018-05-27 21:07
+1 i live near SF kill them all
2018-05-28 19:09
#376
 | 
United States ascendaNt_88 
HEY LIBERALS despacito
2018-05-30 13:16
#126
 | 
Denmark Sir_Cumcised 
The nukes werent that powerful? Tell that to the people of Hiroshima. Oh wait
2018-05-28 01:45
yeah the population of Hiroshima was around 350k. The nuke killed around 90k -120k people mostly in the center. about 2/3 survived. in fact today there are many survivors still alive.
2018-05-28 01:49
the soviet army was also ill prepared and lots of men who fought resorted to eating clothes and starving. The Russian winter was the best army the allies could have hoped for or the city of stalingrad was almost in german hands
2018-05-28 03:13
#337
 | 
Iran Xanbibi 
Ur Americas bitch israeli
2018-05-29 16:10
iran OMEGAFUCKINGLUL
2018-05-29 20:50
#358
 | 
Iran Xanbibi 
Doesnt relize your country is a joke and a puppet state to the US government and that every country in the EU is getting tired of your guys shit and is charging y'all for genocide against the palestines OMEGAFUCKINGLOLRETARD
2018-05-29 22:03
getting tired of us. because of you we are having peace with countries in the region,because no one wants you to have a nuclear bomb
2018-05-29 22:21
#360
 | 
Iran Xanbibi 
ya and Europe is Complying with that, do u see the UN charging us with humanitarian crimes? You guys bring nothing but war to the country u keep fucking killing the Palestines and bombing the countries next to cause of terrorist groups attacking u, u kill civilians cause of terrorist that aint good bud ly
2018-05-30 02:30
yeah cuz hitler became delusional and arrogant he thought nobody could stop him and didnt listen to his generals if he would have listened they would probably have won the fight against russia and probably the war
2018-05-27 20:52
Instead of going for Moscow he diverted his tanks south into Ukraine to capture Kiev and then Crimea. It took many weeks of battle to capture it and allowed Russia to amass another 10 armies in front of Moscow.
2018-05-27 20:57
Also he wanted to bomb symbolic targets in britain instead of strategic ones which is completely insane, which we all know hitler was
2018-05-28 18:43
Slight correction. The Germans were bombing strategic targets at first, but Hitler became mad because the Brits were bombing German civilians, so Hitler decided to start bombing civilians as well, leading to the UK being able to fix their bombed runways etc. Very dumb move by Hitler.
2018-05-28 19:11
True. Imagine beeing a german general seeing the stupid stuff hitler did but you are not able to stand up against his bs w/o getting a bullet in the back of your head
2018-05-28 20:14
Hitler was just an idiot in command of the german war effort, he tought he was a unbeatable commander. It's hard to understand how germans followed him so much after he started messing up things, during WW1 the german high command was way smarter
2018-05-29 15:31
Cause you could not say something against him without getting killed E:rather live a good life as an general and let hitler fuck everything up than getting you and your family shot
2018-05-29 15:49
#355
Germany jnc 
like Rommel for example. he saw war was over and his intention was to stop it so they frame him so he commits suicide.
2018-05-29 21:06
FUCKING NOBODY was more insane than Winston Churchill.
2018-05-29 15:55
#30
 | 
Germany GiiGa88 
And? The fresh soldiers were even prouder to fight for their land, they fought like their idols
2018-05-27 21:03
they did have the hitler zeal but didnt have the experience of fighting back a much larger force. it bogged down to trench warfare and retreat.
2018-05-27 21:05
-1 bad tactics
2018-05-27 22:22
french army all the way xd
2018-05-27 20:44
#15
 | 
United States PsychoLogical 
*trying so hard not to make a french surrender joke*
2018-05-27 20:48
#27
 | 
Denmark muggge 
ahahha
2018-05-27 20:59
Actually, the surrending mostly came from politicians. French soldiers fought really hard to help british in west and north of France, and it was mainly a sacrifice, respect that man.
2018-05-27 22:05
because nazis invaded through belgium and all your defences were at german border
2018-05-27 22:27
#75
shroud | 
France Vehk 
Yeah, Belgians refused we build a frontline at their border to defend them and ourselves. Pretty much what happened. I can add that Belgium was already being assholes because we were building some defenses alongside the French-Belgian border in case of German invasion. lol.
2018-05-27 22:29
belgians and dutch had no time to react. they thought the offensive was going to start from a massive land push but Germany used elite paratroopers to capture all their strategic bridges and prevent their destruction. this allowed their panzers to roll into france in days.
2018-05-27 22:53
#83
 | 
Portugal nakbarone 
Southern France kept strong asf, these France surrender memes and shit and so incredibly inaccurate that it gets to the point where it's cringe.
2018-05-27 22:38
#96
shroud | 
France Vehk 
My city resisted fiercely, and allowed the war to keep going on another front, and allowed us to have bases to send US troops from. Without that, the war would be lost. Tactical loss, strategic victory which allowed some French soldiers to escape and saved the whole British army.
2018-05-28 00:14
#102
 | 
Portugal nakbarone 
Indeed. France played a major role on the war.
2018-05-28 00:25
many of them were sympathizing with the Germans actually or were afraid to fight, when the Polish 10th Armored Brigade was ordered to retake the town of Montbard from the Germans together with the French 42nd division in 1940, the French simply retreated towards the safety of Dijon and the Poles captured the town by themselves
2018-05-28 00:25
still doesn’t mean that some French soldiers fought hardly in north of France (look at the film Dunkerque, it’s pretty accurate actually) Not to mention the ones who got to England to keep on the fight Also, what people fail to realize is how often French troops fought at the back to let defeated British troops retreat, it happened a lot in north of France in 1940 (with the end in Dunkerque but they retarded the invasion for Several monthes ), and same in Africa with the fight of Bir Hakeim. So yes, they lost and surrended in the end, but if you look at the bigger picture, that’s what allow their allies to regroup and win after that and they fought really outnumbered
2018-05-28 07:19
Oh dont worry the french army had some brilliant victory, not to mention Bir Hakeim that is one of the most impressive tbh But well, i'll let people living with the french surrender meme, today is another day tho... ;)
2018-05-29 07:08
+1
2018-05-28 15:06
+1
2018-05-28 17:59
xdxd
2018-05-28 11:46
#9
 | 
Russia Hamer_world 
Russia lololololo))))
2018-05-27 20:47
#16
 | 
Turkey Alkapon3131 
body army
2018-05-27 20:49
You have 5 man, there are approx 2 guys in b site, ruski still in past.
2018-05-27 21:10
there shouldnt be any doubt that germany had the best ofc. best tanks, best planes, not enough material, but lets say out of the beginning situation in 1939 1940 they would have beaten anyone in a 1on1 on paper
2018-05-27 20:47
German tanks of 1940 sucked ass. they were made for highly maneuverable warfare. Panzer 3s performed horribly against soviet KV1 tanks in particular. The Panther tanks imo were the best in the world no doubt. Tigers were too slow and burned too much fuel.
2018-05-27 20:50
on paper the Panthers were a better tank but a lot of them were operated by inexperienced crews and due to the Germany's condition at the time they were in combat, they generally had a pretty poor combat performance. On the other hand the Tiger had an exceptional combat record even if there was a lot of mechanical problems with them.
2018-05-27 21:12
Glad that your opinion is just based on an opinion, and not on facts ; ). Dipshit, you dont know what you are talking about do you
2018-05-27 21:47
why insult if you have some info please share it.
2018-05-27 21:56
#76
 | 
Poland Spectra_CS 
what do u mean maus best tonk xd
2018-05-27 22:28
#191
 | 
Norway JorgyZ 
>germans >highly maneuverable warfare >panzer viii maus
2018-05-28 18:43
fuckin castle of kruppsteal with a cannon on top of it roles in your city. Not really maneuverable but who cares it doesn't take the road anyway it goes through the houses
2018-05-28 20:20
#125
Thorin | 
Egypt True_ 
Germany's only problem was that they could never compete in the sea because Britain had full control since destroying the Spanish Navy or I think a storm destroyed it.
2018-05-28 01:45
on the one hand true, on the other hand showed the war that air sovereignty decides basically everything. pacific war has shown that aircraft-carrier > battleships. With the invention of jet engines, germany would have got a huge advantage even over the royal navy if they had enough material to work with
2018-05-28 03:02
Germany
2018-05-27 20:48
Third reich
2018-05-27 20:48
#17
 | 
Poland weo000 
Wechrmacht
2018-05-27 20:49
German army , not even a question
2018-05-27 20:49
#23
 | 
United States Z0sik 
USA or Germany.
2018-05-27 20:53
#45
 | 
Germany GiiGa88 
USHaha
2018-05-27 21:22
#86
 | 
United States Z0sik 
Right as we came in y'all started to get fucked.
2018-05-27 23:21
#89
 | 
Germany GiiGa88 
Oh as we we were weakened already and betrayed and our civilians were bombed to death, as we were out of resources, but we never lost our will to fight, because we knew that if we lose the capitalism and the jews would have free control of the world
2018-05-27 23:39
say that without tears
2018-05-28 20:10
Just take a look at his name. I doubt he is born in 1988
2018-05-28 20:22
u are arguing with american who is told from 5 y o that his country is the greatest in the world, won all the wars and basically saving everybody lol, leave this guy alone
2018-05-28 23:49
You did nothing. Your (maybe) ancestors did. The modern USA is full of degenerates.
2018-05-27 23:49
He meant 'we' as in Germans in general, also he is right. Americans came in late and claimed everything, bunch of brain dead goons.
2018-05-28 00:44
"came in late" = fighting for 4 of the 6 years and doing major damage in the european front and singlehandedly winning the pacific front? yeah totally. stay inferior.
2018-05-28 20:11
Mad England couldnt claim America lul 13 colonies ez
2018-05-28 20:41
Denmark. We had bicycle soldiers!!!!
2018-05-27 21:00
WHOAAAA
2018-05-27 21:32
Finland had ski soldiers!!!
2018-05-27 21:34
Best soldiers
2018-05-28 07:24
Bicycles and ww1 era weapons > skis and molotov cocktails
2018-05-28 17:53
#32
 | 
Poland Big$moke 
of course Soviet Union
2018-05-27 21:05
#127
Thorin | 
Egypt True_ 
Soviet Union had numbers and thats it
2018-05-28 01:45
They also had/has a strong defence just like the finns
2018-05-28 19:06
#221
Thorin | 
Egypt True_ 
not a strong defence they just burn everything that they leave behind and it was too cold for Germans
2018-05-28 19:25
I like it how people think that Russians are some kind of bears and can handle with cold better than others. And Germans never seen a snow and never felt cold in their lives. Seems smart
2018-05-31 16:14
#426
Thorin | 
Egypt True_ 
A Russian lives in a colder area than a German. if you live in a cold place you get used to it. Also, Germans didn't have winter clothing while the Russians did which led to many Germans dying off. One last thing Russians had numbers. Your name seems ironic as well.
2018-05-31 16:17
U cant "get used" to a cold. Idiot. Its biology. Its still cold when its -30 C no matter even if the weather is like this every winter. (which is true only for Siberian's regions, where was not a single German). Average temperature in Moscow in winter is -6 C. NOT THAT COLD I THINK. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow "didnt have winter clothing". Sure. I bet they were naked. They probably didn't know that in winter you have to wear clothing. They are too stupid to know that. typical brainwashed guy. Your name seems ironic as well
2018-05-31 16:26
#430
Thorin | 
Egypt True_ 
You realize the Germans expected a quick win and fought with Summer clothing. Then when they didn't win so quickly winter came in and they weren't prepared for it?
2018-05-31 16:44
#350
 | 
Russia iGNISKEY 
I can't say that though, the war was almost at the worst time for USSR. Stalin repressions had literally all of the officers and generals dead, most notably Tukhachevskiy, who was the most experienced Soviet military leader (he even took part in the WW1). As a result, there were literally no experienced officers at the beginning of the war. With those, USSR could have had a better time even without the modernization finished.
2018-05-29 18:33
SS Waffen and the finish one
2018-05-27 21:10
Finnish person who can't spell "finnish" (I assume you meant "finnish"?).
2018-05-27 21:14
Can you spell "English" in a language other than English?
2018-05-28 01:43
Yes?
2018-05-28 14:19
Got baited by British flag
2018-05-28 14:24
Nice
2018-05-28 14:25
YES but i have dyslexia and autism so iam sry for being a ban Finn
2018-05-30 19:36
German ofc
2018-05-27 21:10
#37
 | 
Russia Reqq1 
USSR
2018-05-27 21:11
lul what happened against finland?
2018-05-27 22:08
#107
 | 
Brazil Waldemar H. 
who won the war? fucking idiot
2018-05-28 00:34
it was a tie
2018-05-28 14:13
get your facts straight lol
2018-05-28 23:50
ussr didnt win the war lul ;D
2018-05-29 13:07
#195
 | 
Norway JorgyZ 
Only reason the USSR were powerful was because of man power, no real training, not even weapons for everyone, not enough ammunition, bat shit crazy officers and their air force was lacking heavily.. "When Nazi Germany attacked the Soviet Union in June 1941, it quickly became apparent that the Soviet Air Force was not prepared for war."
2018-05-28 18:46
#229
 | 
Russia Reqq1 
I consider the USSR the best army of heroism and morale of soldiers. The best army is estimated not only by technology. Our soldiers cannot be broken.
2018-05-28 20:01
Well they could choose to stay at the front (where they might survive) or get a bullet in the head by stalin. Not really heroic but ye
2018-05-28 20:24
> USSR > heroism and morale of soldiers xDDDDDDDDDDD varlamov.ru/2810459.html?page=5&cut_expa..
2018-05-28 20:39
#278
 | 
Russia SpittyC 
Where did u read it? USSR had enough weapons, ammunition, supplies, and all that military staff during the whole war(mb except the first 3 months). The only big problem was food supplies.
2018-05-28 22:57
#320
 | 
Norway JorgyZ 
Thats not true
2018-05-29 15:27
#322
 | 
Russia SpittyC 
Thats not an argument
2018-05-29 15:29
#323
 | 
Norway JorgyZ 
But at least im not lying
2018-05-29 15:30
#351
 | 
Russia SpittyC 
Thats not an argument
2018-05-29 19:05
#353
 | 
Norway JorgyZ 
"thats not an argument" isnt an argument either
2018-05-29 20:58
#418
 | 
Indonesia resolut 
Get your dicks out and we'll measure who's right
2018-05-31 09:02
#424
 | 
Norway JorgyZ 
Nah that would be humiliating for 735
2018-05-31 16:09
USA, even though I hate to say it.
2018-05-27 21:12
atleast you have balls to admit it unlike everyone else lol
2018-05-27 22:29
Dude, they say Germans fucked up in Europe cuz entire army died on Russia but Africa shared the same fate even though they had one of the best commanders in the world.
2018-05-28 17:50
USA ??? So tell me why didnt the USA capture Berlin? I think they scared to face off with Russians in centre of city
2018-05-28 19:07
expected from american thinking you had the best army, UK finished off germany then USA stole the kill last sec nt, only reason you won over japan was because of ur nukes
2018-05-28 23:58
USA has only good location nothing more
2018-05-29 13:41
#41
 | 
Europe Hue_Ganus 
cause no one gave a shit to take finnland xD,probably the germans had the best army or maybe the us ,russia had great numbers tho
2018-05-27 21:15
Soviets tried but so many of their soldiers died so they needed to end the war and didnt invade expect little parts
2018-05-27 21:35
#69
 | 
Europe Hue_Ganus 
yeah of course they tried ,but they didnt commit ,finnland wasnt on of the main focuses ,of course they did well i am not denying that,but saying that it is best army in ww2 is a bit of a stretch
2018-05-27 22:16
the army with feminist female soldiers who had robotic arms and destroyed everyone
2018-05-27 21:15
Kappa
2018-05-28 11:55
#261
 | 
Luxembourg fowkingell 
Don't forget the blue paint on their faces.
2018-05-28 20:47
Finnish army, British army, and soviet union
2018-05-27 21:16
the soviet union was certainly the most disorganised army that ever existed
2018-05-28 00:32
still rekt reich
2018-05-28 11:47
It's hard to lose when you have a shit ton of soldiers, a shit ton of supply from the allies, and the enemy is freezing to death + is fighting on 2 fronts
2018-05-28 13:20
Fighting on 2 fronts only from 1943 when USSR break Germany, what an honor to divide win with rats, be sure allies just wait for one of the country become to weak to fight on 2 fronts
2018-05-28 20:20
don't forget the soviets were allies of the nazis until 1941, and the allies gave you a lot of supply, both armament and food
2018-05-28 22:47
Finnish and German army. I love how Finnish army used to wreck Soviets with StuG III.
2018-05-27 21:20
#128
Thorin | 
Egypt True_ 
All the Soviets had were just numbers nothing else
2018-05-28 01:47
Yup. That's true.
2018-05-28 02:43
#46
 | 
Denmark muggge 
Where is there so many people saying Finland. Finland did good in terms of the winter war but they were never a superpower like USA, USSR & Germany
2018-05-27 21:22
#130
Thorin | 
Egypt True_ 
they just happy because Finland beat USSR and also at that time I would say USSR was getting close to a superpower, but it wasn't yet because they had the worst army in ww2 honestly they lost to everyone and only beat Germany because Hitler made the same mistake Napoleon did. Though after ww2 USSR became a power with the US.
2018-05-28 01:48
*not knowing shit about ww2 battles* *acting like knows* retard spotted
2018-05-28 02:29
#47
natu | 
Finland sadmen 
EZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
2018-05-27 21:23
#48
 | 
Tunisia Yuri_Tarded 
Germany, just too many mistakes and not the right allies
2018-05-27 21:23
#319
 | 
Netherlands Darkrain 
so that makes them not the best army does it..
2018-05-29 14:26
#49
 | 
Finland Aibbee 
Why does Molotov cost 400€ in cs when to finns it costed like 5€
2018-05-27 21:31
does absolut vodka cost 3€?
2018-05-27 21:33
it actually costs $400 which is like 340€ or something like that
2018-05-27 21:37
you dont need 400$ bottle of alcohol to make molotov
2018-05-28 10:38
#196
 | 
Norway JorgyZ 
Absolut vodka 1 litre 40% costs like 60 dollars dude wtf are you talking about
2018-05-28 18:48
in game
2018-05-28 21:14
#273
 | 
Norway JorgyZ 
Srry i thought you replied to #51 lul
2018-05-28 21:41
#53
 | 
Germany slyyf 
Wehrmacht cause of tactics in the early stages, U.S. Army in the latter stages Honorable mention: Finnish army during the Winter War
2018-05-27 21:35
Also germany because they were litteraly years ahead in terms of militaryequipment
2018-05-28 21:18
#271
 | 
Germany slyyf 
In the beginning of the war, that wasn't the case. Quite the opposite.
2018-05-28 21:20
Interesting question. We must remember to not only consider ground troops, but also airforce and navy. Some quick thoughts from me: Eastern Front: -Russia had an immense amount of manpower. They weren't necessarily technologically advanced, but could throw body after body on the Eastern front until the German war machine collapsed. Distinct advantage the Russians had (and have long had in past wars) is the size of the country and freezing winters it produces. You could say that overstretched supply lines and awful conditions defeated the German army there. -BUT: What people often overlook when saying something like 'The Russians won the war by themselves' is that the German army was not wholly dedicated to invasion. Many divisions HAD to remain in Africa, the Mediterranean and on the Western Front due to the threat of the British. That's before you even consider the enormous amount of resources dedicated to the Holocaust in the concentration camps and by the Einsatzgruppen. If the Nazis had gone about the invasion of Russia more tactfully and with more resources (which they had) I am about 95% sure they would have defeated the Soviet Union. -> Remember, they didn't need to conquer all the way to Siberia, just the vital cities in the East, where Russia is most populous, which they almost got to. In summary of this section, German Army was better than Soviet one, despite losing. After all, for every 1 German that died, 5 Russians did. Western Front: -The case for France: Many people just dismiss them as surrendering monkeys. Isn't that fair TBH. French army in 1939/1940 could rival Germany / Britain, they were even more advanced in terms of weaponry than the former - they just got a bit fucked over. Maginot Line/French resources were dedicated to the wrong place, Germans gained a lot of ground up North. The Belgian surrender didn't help the cause either. Additionally we (British) didn't exactly supply the most help to them in the Battle of France. They had a MASSIVE border with Germany to try and defend and it just proved to be impossible to do so. I put France right at the top at the start of the war, despite their quick defeat. Britain: Stood alone against Nazi Germany from the Fall of France (June 1940) all the way until the Invasion of Russia (June 1941). In that whole time, Hitler could not invade at all, as he had easily done with other European countries. Royal Navy was completely unmatched at sea. Royal Air Force defeated the Luftwaffe, and the entire British Expeditionary Force was located the island ready to defend to the death. I know we have a sea border, but I rate us as having the strongest defense in the world at this time. Hitler knew there was no hope with Operation Sealion, so he turned to Russia and came close to defeating them. USA - Lucky they have huge ocean borders, I'm not lying when I tell you if USA was suddenly transported 5,000 miles West at the start of the war, Germany would have DESTROYED them. By the end of the war with the atomic bombs and total mobilization I suppose they are unmatched. I don't know enough about the actual military at this time to comment though. Pacific war is boring compared to the European one! TL;DR? -Germany -> Best offensive -Britain -> Best defensive -USA -> Strongest by the end
2018-05-27 21:36
#66
s1mple | 
United States iScorps 
-Germany and Finland ->best, could fight battles when outnumbered by huge amounts -Britain -> Left France and Poland to die and only survived cause of good navy. Trash land forces -USA -> Fought germans weak western front cant really tell.
2018-05-27 22:04
US is irrelevant in ww2 for me because they came in late and claimed they won, the british royal air force was amazing though, hard to counter. Germany had good ground forces, tanks, infantry, whatever else. Also not out fault that Poland was so easy to be invaded and couldn't do much better at helping the french, though i respect the French because they helped the allies. < talking about French soldiers, the political side of France was different I think.
2018-05-28 00:49
This is the dumbest fucking comment in history....London was being bombed DAILY by Germans before we came and saved your asses. You'd all be speaking German if it wasn't for us and THIS is the thanks we get. FUCK off you little dumb prick.
2018-05-28 20:16
#408
 | 
Brazil ;---) 
we would be speaking german if wasn't the soviets, they did the most dirty work, the western front had little impact to the outcome of war, and when the americans landed in europe, germany was already weakened being their troops most comprised with recruits
2018-05-31 08:36
You would be speaking Russian if it weren't for U.S. Troops stationed in West Germany.
2018-05-31 08:38
#422
 | 
Brazil ;---) 
i agree
2018-05-31 12:25
So who stormed the entrances of the Concentration camp and liberated the jews? Exactly. Surrounding countries fought to surpress communism and to make sure they weren't invaded. US fought to liberate and supress communism. We fight the good fight ez.
2018-05-28 20:43
Nice try, brain dead American.
2018-05-28 21:24
Says UK.
2018-05-28 22:59
Nice try, brain dead American.
2018-05-28 23:45
Says U.k
2018-05-29 02:05
Nice try, brain dead American.
2018-05-29 02:25
Uk says
2018-05-29 02:40
Nice try, brain dead American.
2018-05-29 02:47
> Royal Navy was completely unmatched at sea Depends. As a traditional naval force, it was unmatched for sure. But you can't forget the infamous U-boots that were beyond any submarines at that time. Without cracking the Enigma code, both England and US would have had a considerably harder time going into the Western front later on.
2018-05-27 22:19
#131
Thorin | 
Egypt True_ 
Not even the Enigma Code but if Germany either won in Russia or didn't touch Russia and just invaded them later Germany would control all of Europe by now. Hitler did the exact same thing as Napoleon.
2018-05-28 01:51
Guess what? Britain:best defend,only if there is no man advantage, i guess USSR can break GB anyway, bcs we have more planes,ships and peoples.
2018-05-28 20:30
More ships are u crazy? 1939 Navy comparisons Battleships - UK (19) - USSR (3) Destroyers - UK (335) - USSR (59) Mate UK could have literally taken on the entire world at sea at this point and had a chance at winning.
2018-05-28 23:08
The UK would be fucked if the US had not entered the war. If the Germans had just a few more months London and all British ports + air bases would be turned into rubish by V2 rockets.
2018-05-29 21:06
I mean... the UK was alone versus Germany for an entire year. France was defeated in June 1940 and USA doesn't even enter the Western theatre of warfare until 1942, so I have no idea what you mean when you say the UK is fucked without USA. We repelled Nazi Germany just fine with our OWN navy and air force, so much so that Hitler abandoned his plans to invade us, all before USA even thought about entering the war, We would certainly struggle to mount a counter attack and defeat the Germans, but equally, they had no hope of invading us.
2018-05-30 02:54
do you know what is a V2 rocket? It was a german balistic missile developed on the final stages of the war. If Germany had a few more months they would be able to rain them over the UK, destroing all your air/naval bases without the need of an invasion. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-2_rocket
2018-05-30 05:26
Yeah... they didn't have a few more months though, what kind of argument is that? LMFAO. They couldn't hold off USA+UK from the West and USSR from the East, so they lost. We invaded them, and won. In 1940, when the threat of invasion was most paramount, Germany could not do it and had no hope of doing so. That's just like saying 'if the battle of France had gone on for another 3 months we could have stabilised our forces and not had to evacuate at Dunkirk'
2018-05-30 12:04
my point is: Americans saved the UK.
2018-05-30 20:39
You should read up on some basic dates/facts of world war two.
2018-05-31 00:52
the truth is: The UK would never be able to invade German occupied Europe by itself. Without the threat of an US + UK invasion, Germany would be able to deploy more units on its east front and stop (or at least delay) USSR counter offensive. +Italy would be able to help the Germans on stopping the Soviets. And, in the meantime, the UK would get rekt by V2 rockets.
2018-05-31 01:56
Wehrmacht for sure.
2018-05-27 21:45
#59
 | 
Estonia teremartin 
nazi estonian
2018-05-27 21:46
#60
 | 
Brazil $anji 
finns switzerland estonia
2018-05-27 21:47
Switzerland was neutral Was Estonia a country back then?
2018-05-28 00:50
Estonia is 100 years in 2018 (i think) But i think Soviet Union invaded them
2018-05-29 15:36
Oh damn, didn't know :p
2018-05-29 17:52
#63
 | 
Czech Republic NtonyYoYoYo 
finns ,because of white death
2018-05-27 21:57
#64
s1mple | 
United States iScorps 
well germans Wehrmacht is still best army trough years. and second comes finland. allies just outnumbered them always
2018-05-27 22:02
#132
Thorin | 
Egypt True_ 
Finland 100% overrated Second is US then Britain. Though Japan does need an Honorable mention
2018-05-28 01:52
#65
 | 
Poland HotMuslim 
germany obviously
2018-05-27 22:03
Germany for sure Finland is overrated. Finnish forces were insane on their own land, but no invasion force and no adaptability.
2018-05-27 22:21
Russian
2018-05-27 22:27
GERMANY
2018-05-27 22:29
Impossible to say. Germans were more technologically advanced in some aspects and the allies in others.
2018-05-27 22:31
germany had jet engines and rockets before anyone but they lacked one crucial companent. the proximity fuze.
2018-05-27 22:50
#133
Thorin | 
Egypt True_ 
They lacked nukes
2018-05-28 01:52
Probably germany =D
2018-05-27 22:35
#88
 | 
United States autimaticTV 
USA
2018-05-27 23:23
#91
 | 
Lithuania Paulius_CS 
Red army! They returned our land so I support them.
2018-05-27 23:52
#92
Friis | 
Canada uhJake 
Best? Well Uncle Sam. Nt Germany you are a beautiful idea
2018-05-27 23:54
Depends, by bellicose power it's clearly URSS and USA. They had tremendous numbers, great war economy, insane manufacturers and very good techs.
2018-05-28 00:08
When you speak about USA you must know that they didnt even fight, bcs they fun with Japan. Oh wait they nuke 2 cities when war was over, civilian
2018-05-28 20:39
+1
2018-05-28 20:40
Mad cuz u have 0 nukes ? Ez
2018-05-28 20:45
Mad cos autistics killes above million civilian people when war was over
2018-05-28 20:50
This is an international site, please write your comment in English.
2018-05-28 20:50
I wrote it in American
2018-05-28 21:15
poland for sure
2018-05-28 00:12
#106
 | 
Lithuania Paulius_CS 
Latvia looked sexy in that period, Fs in chat for Abrene district
2018-05-28 00:32
#97
 | 
Finland User344 
Simo "Simuna" Häyhä doesn’t need these optical advantages they call scopes.
2018-05-28 00:17
#98
 | 
Canada zizzle21 
Rothschild Family got everyone to fight for them while they just made money... (early darkweb) lol
2018-05-28 00:17
Italy,easily
2018-05-28 00:18
#100
 | 
United States ItsImpact 
Realistically USA was the strongest only because of the nukes they launched but I would say Germany
2018-05-28 00:23
At the 1939 germany for sure , at the end USSR and USA
2018-05-28 00:27
big countries USA by far small countries Greece by far
2018-05-28 00:30
Sweden had best army, 0 deaths ww2
2018-05-28 00:36
+1
2018-05-28 00:51
#136
 | 
Germany Chris Walker 
2018-05-28 02:00
Well some swedes were apart of The German SS and others in The finnish army = ezpcy swe Best Edit: and We should have had tons of americans with swedish roots as well Ggwp
2018-05-28 11:46
#110
 | 
Brazil Waldemar H. 
Germany, japan or maybe great britain the soviet finland war is being so falsely comprehended that everybody is just going to the wikipedia page and is looking at the numbers and make their own conclusions without research what happened in reality.
2018-05-28 00:39
If, during ww2, Germany went on a one-on-one war/battle against Britain, they would win. Japan slightly irrelevant in this topic. Germany and US were the 'big boys'.
2018-05-28 00:53
#149
 | 
Brazil Waldemar H. 
we kinda had an one-on-one battle in africa
2018-05-28 10:11
We? Brazil? Fake flagging or bait?
2018-05-28 12:31
One-on-one ? It was the entire Commonwealth (UK, India, Canada, Australia, South Africa, etc) + the remaining of the French army + the USA against MAINLY Italy + Germany. Not even close to one-on-one, and if anything it was UK vs Italy there.
2018-05-28 15:15
#275
 | 
Brazil Waldemar H. 
it was montgomery (new general for that specific war) vs erwin rommel in africa
2018-05-28 21:57
#137
 | 
Germany Chris Walker 
How japan, they just got rekt by the US
2018-05-28 02:01
+1
2018-05-28 20:45
Japan was dangerous cuz they were not worried about death.
2018-05-28 00:39
LOL that's a nice comment
2018-05-28 00:51
same goes to Poland
2018-05-28 01:33
Its not the same situation. Japan was doing suicide attacks in glory to their emperor
2018-05-28 11:39
#119
 | 
United States Z0sik 
This is a super biased topic..
2018-05-28 01:19
#120
 | 
Brazil GoldZera 
france
2018-05-28 01:24
#123
 | 
Yugoslavia niofalpha 
#1. Finns, they had all the advantages but still, they obliterated both the Nazi, and USSR. #2. Soviets #3. America #4 Nazis #5 Ethiopia
2018-05-28 01:34
So Finns army suck, they choose peace with USSR advantage in winter war, then attack us with nazi, start suck and became our aliies, wp Finland, you have chance to make it 1-1
2018-05-28 20:44
But Finns collaborated with III Reich, wtf man
2018-05-29 03:52
#299
 | 
Yugoslavia niofalpha 
They then fought against them. Finland fought on 2 sides of the war
2018-05-29 03:58
It's hardly called fighting on 2 fronts. Obviously they did well against the Soviets, but saying that they fought vs both powerhouses is a huge abuse.
2018-05-29 04:01
#301
 | 
Yugoslavia niofalpha 
2018-05-29 04:02
dude, you do realize how funny this looks?:P 15 September 1944 – 27 April 1945 -means after D-day -means 3 months after the war was basically over -with a support of USSR and Allies pushing the Western Front and you're telling this to a Polish guy you can fight 2 fronts only simultaneously man, otherwise its 2 different conlficts I respect Finns for what they did in the Winter War, but this is a fucking joke.
2018-05-29 04:18
In the Lapland war, the germans HAD to leave finland, so finland and germany decided to do a fake "fight". So no one would die and the germans would leave finland and not much resources would be used etc. But then some political alliance or smt (cant remember) noticed it and Finland was "forced" to fight Germany. Don't know if it's 100% true, but that's what i remember from school.
2018-05-29 15:41
Ok, but why would they fake it? To pull some of the Red Army to the north ?
2018-05-29 16:07
I think it was because they didn't wan't to fight eachother and stay as "allies".
2018-05-29 16:07
The ones who said that German soldiers must leave Finland wanted them to "fight" but Germany and Finland didn't wan't to, so they "faked" the fight.
2018-05-29 16:09
#134
 | 
United States TriHardSeven 
I would say the Brits, truly determined people. They were on the brink but they held out.
2018-05-28 01:53
they had the channel for them. had they been in Frances position they would have to settle for peace.
2018-05-28 01:56
#181
 | 
United Kingdom sam1cs 
and Finland had mountains protecting them, what's your point?
2018-05-28 18:01
#185
 | 
Germany PhoenixD!!! 
what mountains lol there are no mountains on the finno-russian border
2018-05-28 18:11
#187
 | 
United Kingdom sam1cs 
who said the finno-russian border?
2018-05-28 18:30
#188
 | 
Germany PhoenixD!!! 
i dunno what other mountains protected finland?
2018-05-28 18:34
There is literally 0 mountains in Finland so i guess you ment lakes because we have thousands of those.
2018-05-29 10:46
#312
 | 
United Kingdom sam1cs 
Yeah i could've stated it better. I meant lakes, cold environments and general position of it.
2018-05-29 12:14
#151
 | 
United Kingdom RannarrCSGO 
Awwwwww stop it
2018-05-28 10:12
I S R A E L
2018-05-28 02:45
Ur army were in camps btw LUL
2018-05-28 20:46
k
2018-05-28 02:45
#150
 | 
United Kingdom RannarrCSGO 
USSR
2018-05-28 10:12
#152
 | 
United States gtmaniacmda 
What determines best? Most advanced? Germany. Most shit to throw at the enemy? Russia. Least likely to lose? Finland (fucking cold). Most balanced? USA.
2018-05-28 10:15
#156
 | 
Australia arbiter6784 
Rommel himself said that he'd use the Australians to take a city and then the New Zealanders to hold it. I'm not saying the old Oceania boys are the best, but we got some pretty high praise from old mate
2018-05-28 11:43
#159
 | 
Russia Vasy111 
first half- Germany 2nd half- USSR
2018-05-28 11:45
best answer
2018-05-28 20:45
25 odds
2018-05-29 13:35
#160
 | 
United States hdz` 
nukes are the best army. /close
2018-05-28 11:45
Germany? I think they had the best scientists and engineers as well.. so better equipment and tanks/planes, etc. But a bunch of dumb decisions cost them the war.
2018-05-28 11:47
#164
Xyp9x | 
Denmark megz 
The most professional and proficient army was by far the Germans. If Hitler hadn't lost his shit they could have won the war or at least make it last a lot longer. Their main mistake was trying to take on the whole world at the same time. You don't have to be a gifted tactician to see the flaws here.
2018-05-28 11:49
#166
 | 
Slovakia gayzera 
USSR
2018-05-28 11:57
Are some people even serious about Finns? Are you reatrded? Any of the big countries(even France) would have destroyed that shithole without any problems - but nobody needed to cause that country has absolutely nothing to fight for
2018-05-28 17:59
#180
 | 
Russia Slavaa 
USSR army ofc
2018-05-28 18:00
#182
 | 
Malaysia byaIi 
Malaysia
2018-05-28 18:02
germany obviously better ground troops, tanks, artillery, subs, messerschmitt planes,created first prototypes of ballistic missiles called V-2 in 1945 despite being on the brink of collapse don't be retarded
2018-05-28 18:10
#184
 | 
Sweden aer1aL 
2018-05-28 18:07
#186
 | 
United States sxg 
Toughest army = USSR Toughest/most advanced = Germany. But by 1942 - 1943 The U.S army had been pumping out hundreds of thousands of tanks and weapons, while the whole world had been at war and had lost half their stuff. Thankfully the U.S was able to fight Japan and keep them out of Europe and Away from Britain. And was able to send shit tons of supplies and weapons and about half a million troops to the western front to support Britain. This Was Horrible for Hitlers Germany, As now He had a big problem on the West And Winter was hitting on the East in Russia. Here is were the 3rd army was surrounded and killed. Basically the end of the war. Had Hitler never attacked Russia and stock piled the 3rd army and everything he had to keep the invasion out of the West i.e France. The war may have gone much different.
2018-05-28 18:19
go and write a book
2018-05-28 18:45
#222
 | 
United States sxg 
lol
2018-05-28 19:35
If he held out any longer, he would have just got nuked like Japan....gg. Anyone who dare contests that any Military in the world was stronger than the USA at the end of WWII are biased retards. Nobody else had nukes so there is no comparison period. Besides, nobody in this world could have invaded the US and nobody to this day could because the CITIZENS of the USA are the largest armed army in the world, let alone facing our military.
2018-05-28 20:23
#194
JD | 
Poland chujwto 
USSR, they would do everything what their leader would say no matter how preposterous his will was
2018-05-28 18:46
#197
 | 
Norway JorgyZ 
I think the strongest military powers were Britain and Germany
2018-05-28 18:51
Britain OMEGALUL
2018-05-28 19:08
#198
NEO | 
Poland sedi 
Poland, only army which didnt colaborate with germany
2018-05-28 18:52
#199
Twistzz | 
Poland kamuk 
shame maybe our country wouldnt be so destroyed should've given gdansk
2018-05-28 18:54
#200
NEO | 
Poland sedi 
honour
2018-05-28 18:57
#201
Twistzz | 
Poland kamuk 
i'd rather lose honour and save the life of 50390532 people and avoid destroying my own country
2018-05-28 19:02
#202
NEO | 
Poland sedi 
hello hitler, dont kill us, we will help you to conquer the world
2018-05-28 19:04
#216
Twistzz | 
Poland kamuk 
yeah there wasnt a good solution but i still think that we should've accepted the deal with reich
2018-05-28 19:10
#220
NEO | 
Poland sedi 
xd
2018-05-28 19:16
#224
Twistzz | 
Poland kamuk 
whats funny? i know whats funnier warsaw uprising xd xdxd
2018-05-28 19:36
Hitler still would've done the holocaust.
2018-05-28 19:08
#214
Twistzz | 
Poland kamuk 
im not talking about the holocaust but about avoiding the destruction of poland
2018-05-28 19:09
Destroying like 10% of the population counts towards the destruction of a country surely.
2018-05-28 19:13
#223
Twistzz | 
Poland kamuk 
u know shit dont u?
2018-05-28 19:36
Nice argument, reported btw.
2018-05-28 19:37
#226
Twistzz | 
Poland kamuk 
idk u can report me all u want u still dont know shit
2018-05-28 19:38
You have not provided an argument.
2018-05-29 00:10
Still better to lose 10% of population than 30%. Before ww2 Poland had around 35 mln population and after war just around 24 mln. Many people don't know that Poland had no "side" in the ww2, we were just massacred from both side's, it was next partitions of Poland between Germans and Russians. For such event we can only blame our leaders and nobody else while we knew already in 1937 that Russia is preparing to conquer eastern Europe and invade Poland, still our leaders thrown us to war on both fronts instead of do everything to became ally of Germany.
2018-05-29 05:45
Thanks for good reply.
2018-05-29 10:33
No problemo, have a good day Sir.
2018-05-29 13:12
you have to remember, without the US, the Allies don’t win WW2, especially in the pacific theater. USSR handled germany easy, although the main reason for this was the immense number of personnel that they had compared to germany and the axis powers. hitler absolutely fucked germany’s chances at winning, if he doesn’t back-stab stalin and decided to invade massive USSR, they have quite the advantage to win the war. without german scientists defecting to the US and helping to work on the Manhattan project, we would’ve never had a nuke first in ‘45.
2018-05-28 19:05
#227
 | 
United States sxg 
Germany was CRUSHING USSR.... But the same winter that killed Napoleons troops killed Hitlers 3rd Army. Not to mention as the Russians retreated they burned all the farms and live stock so the Germans would starve. They new winter was coming and their supply chain would be cut off and they would starve. They did the EXACT same thing to Napoleons Great army in 1812.
2018-05-28 19:45
lul, at this comment, they have 3 years to win, we dont have everlasting winter, it takes about 4-5 months + wtf its only in north territories, south territories like Crimea and Kyev is more warmer
2018-05-28 20:48
France Army was the best They held Paris for only 2 weeks, it's good stats for them
2018-05-28 19:08
USA just cause its factories cant be bombed or destroyed and having no countries to compete them in the Americas + huge navy to prevent a landing and they had a massive population for a huge army ( 120m)
2018-05-28 19:52
this guy gets it
2018-05-29 03:34
erm usa had nukes, dont see how this is even a conversation =p
2018-05-28 20:05
USA......obviously
2018-05-28 20:06
bad tanks, bad planes, etc
2018-05-30 16:37
good win though :>
2018-05-30 16:57
#410
 | 
Brazil ;---) 
soviets won the war
2018-05-31 08:40
#393
 | 
Brazil 1AxeL1 
Germany
2018-05-30 16:45
#233
 | 
Albania blizaardy 
Stalin for sure
2018-05-28 20:08
#237
 | 
Hungary HunDaniel 
chineese for sure, unlimited manpower op
2018-05-28 20:15
#267
 | 
Germany Chris Walker 
thats the soviet union tho with unlimited manpower
2018-05-28 20:55
#276
 | 
Germany Chris Walker 
Interesting website
2018-05-28 22:08
Americans obviously, I don't remember seeing any Russians on D-Day.
2018-05-28 20:16
#244
 | 
Hungary HunDaniel 
I don't remember seeing Americans on Stalingrad
2018-05-28 20:24
#246
 | 
Poland Funio 
Poles ofc
2018-05-28 20:25
wehrmacht for sure bro
2018-05-28 20:31
Wehrmacht and there's no question about it.
2018-05-28 20:36
yea, as long as they did not have to face an equal enemy
2018-05-29 03:32
The French Army was just as powerful if not more powerful than the German Army, but they were tactically outmaneuvered by the Wehrmacht. Then they fought against the British and all of Eastern Europe. It took the entire world to stop the Wehrmacht.
2018-05-29 03:35
It only took Russian winter and a shitload of T-34's to stop the Wehrmacht. They'd have lost with or without the US support and it is well known today. The main reason for their successes was lack of preparation of other countries.
2018-05-29 03:47
Germans for sure. Failed on decisions not on strength.
2018-05-28 20:51
#280
 | 
Russia SpittyC 
Strongest at the start of the war - German. Strongest at the end of the war - USSR
2018-05-28 23:00
#368
 | 
Europe deVulse 
thats retarded, USSR was strongest at the start of the war number wise its just Germany that kicked their asses hard until they were forced to fight on 2 fronts with half of the world at the same time. Also, strongest at the end of war - USA
2018-05-30 12:24
#370
 | 
Russia SpittyC 
Nope. USSR had more troops than the US, USSR had better land forces(soviet troops were more experienced + the latest soviet tanks(IS-3 and t-44 are much better than Pershing tanks). Air forces were equal at that time, but the US had the better navy. In terms of land war USSR>USA In terms of navy battles USA>USSR. At the start of the war, USSR had retarded HQ, unlike Germany.
2018-05-30 13:08
#378
 | 
Europe deVulse 
lol dude, USSR wouldnt be able to fight with USA simply because their country was already heavily drained coz of immense casualties taken when fighting Germans, their economy was dead (which is also why people hated Stallin so much), US controled west, which was far richer and more valuable than Eastern EU + US's manpower was 3 times or more higher than that of USSR their only downside was that first they'd have to transport rest of their troops through the ocean but still they'd easily crush already nearly dead Russia. Yes, only US won the war, USSR did not, oh and USSR didnt loose to Germans in '42 thankfully to US as well cuz they were sending them everything - resources, weapons, ammo, vehicles etc so that they wont loose too early. US was aware of that if USSR was lost that early then Germany would win the war and later probably invade US as well so yeah you have a point what was USA's bussiness of helping Russians survive the German invasion. Also, IS-3 was garbage and Pershings were far superior to t-44's no idea where did that even came from lol, like for real, every russian tank in ww2-cold war era was a pile of garbage put together, the only good thing about them was that they could shoot back LOL. Their crew survivability was 0, quality 0 and they broke themselves more often than because of combat. Oh there were even numerous reports of T-34's destroying themselves after shooting the main canon cuz barrel of canon was not even properly cast in different spots which resulted in ammo exploding inside barrel WHICH often not only disabled the tank's armament but usually killing the crew at the same time (sometimes putting rest of ammo on fire and destroying whole vehicle along with crew). Yes thats what happens when you mass produce garbage badly-thought vehicles, and the reason you're not teached that in school is your lovely Russia's propaganda m8. Also, first deployed IS-3's engine broke up a few times before it even reached the destination LUL (it was that IS-3 that russians waited for after taking Berlin for parade of victory or w/e its called). So yes, Russia was the strongest at the beggining but Germans were far better and rekt them hard. And USA was far better at the end of the war, thats why many historians say that only USA won the WW2 considering they've barely taken any casualties in comparision to other countries, especially Germany/Russia :)
2018-05-30 16:11
#383
 | 
Russia SpittyC 
tldr
2018-05-30 16:34
#384
 | 
Russia SpittyC 
If us were so powerful they would declare the war after the defeat of japan, but they did not do that because it would be super risky
2018-05-30 16:35
#387
 | 
Europe deVulse 
And why would they declare the war on USSR in the first place....?
2018-05-30 16:37
#389
 | 
Russia SpittyC 
its too long to explain to you, google it, both us and ussr had plans of declaring war to each other after the end of 2nd WW
2018-05-30 16:39
#391
 | 
Europe deVulse 
Lol, mb ffs they just didnt want to further murder each other for no reason at all, ever though of that? Still, US would easily crush USSR after the War, USSR was simply too weakened coz of all the casualties (which were immense) to fight another war with any "major" opponent, u get that? Best proof - look what was happening after the war in US and USSR, US was getting richer and had even more influences in EU and world in general and USSR was starving, there werent even enough men to fill the jobs cuz of how many of them died during the war (yes, women didnt die even nearly as much which is also why BF5 trailer is retarded feminist BS).
2018-05-30 16:44
#290
 | 
United States n3h 
USA cuz they had nukes and pretty much caused it to end with japans surrender. If only japan surrended when italy + germany did they wouldnt of got the nukes :/ USA was easily the strongest by the end, but dosent mean they were most impactful during ww2.
2018-05-29 02:50
they already were defeated when usa dropped nukes.....
2018-05-29 16:11
#356
 | 
Turkey ByMFG 
only in the islands not in mainland.
2018-05-29 21:08
#379
 | 
Europe deVulse 
but it was already obvious that sooner or later they'll loose, they just didnt want to surrender and because of "honor" etc decided to sacrifice thousands of human beings, their own people for...no reason at all, and...the result was still the same - they surrendered. Japan LUL
2018-05-30 16:13
Simo "White Death" Toledo
2018-05-29 02:48
+1
2018-05-29 10:49
#303
 | 
United States jew_cuck 
Finland lost to the Russians... they didnt lose as many men but in the end Russia broke through and the Finnish government had to sue for peace and lost more territory than the soviets asked them to give them before the war so they lost a few thousand people and more territory than they would have if they just accepted the deal from the USSR, and int the beginning the USSR was going to trade land not just take it.
2018-05-29 04:34
#380
 | 
Europe deVulse 
thats what happens when you are overly patriotic lul
2018-05-30 16:17
I'd say Japan but they screw over hardly in the battle of Midway where they've lost 4 battle carriers and from this point war was being lost. Japs were most cruel and tough guys even after getting nuked they didn't want to surrender, they just surrendered only because USSR has joined and invaded them.
2018-05-29 06:36
#382
 | 
Europe deVulse 
"Japs were most cruel and tough guys even after getting nuked they didn't want to surrender" You realize you are literally praising their retardness? Thats pretty much like saying - oh we know we already lost, but let more of our people die for no reason at all even if result will still be the same. >makes sense right LUL
2018-05-30 16:19
Retardness because someone is fighting til the end instead of white flag? Aha okey.
2018-05-30 16:38
#306
 | 
Brazil BlueLighting 
FEB>>>>ALL A cobra vai fumar
2018-05-29 06:29
Over all history i would say France (napolean era specially) Current time i would say Israel and USA (USA only have lots of stuff but i dont think their basic soldiers are that hardcore just cannon food) In the future i would say nordic countries together (fi, nor, danes) note no sweds they are pussies we dont need them.
2018-05-29 10:42
#318
 | 
Cyprus Swishh_ 
did u even read the title before u commented
2018-05-29 13:42
the US army has the most advanced and well trained infantry force in the world, most countries aren't even close
2018-05-29 15:28
#375
 | 
Syria Asiimov 
Sure we dont need sweden with their amazing tech that is years ahead of ours smh
2018-05-30 13:11
#313
 | 
Turkey Rjea 
Germany had best army of course what a shitty question
2018-05-29 12:25
#366
 | 
Europe deVulse 
+1
2018-05-30 12:22
#324
 | 
United Kingdom 1942Flow 
Germany, and British, our RAF & Navy was too strong
2018-05-29 15:31
Both Germany and British got rekt in north Africa. Unfortunatly, 3700 french beat 40K germans in Bir Hakeim so british can regroup and defend Suez Canal.
2018-05-29 17:55
nt, since it were the useless italians who attacked the french and carried the losses - not the germans.
2018-05-29 18:04
No. Both Germans and Italians rekt British and then, 3700 frenches saved the day fighting 1v10 for 14 days. BTW French Foreign Legion => Best army
2018-05-29 18:09
nope. germans rekt british while italians attacked the frenchs and took heavy losses until the germans arrived and washed up the shit. and thats basically the story when italy was involved. but its ok, frenchs make a lot of propaganda about this. they had to show that they are worth something after the 40 days rekt. slaughtering some italians was not very sensational, they always talk about "axis powers" and include germans .
2018-05-29 18:20
It was Afrika Korp Division + 2 panzer division + Italian infantery division and 1 italian artillery division, air support was german, and even Rommel spoke of this battle in his memories. But sure, it was only italians.
2018-05-29 21:54
#392
 | 
Brazil 1AxeL1 
the school of france teach you that? i mean, i've studied without nationalism, cuz Brazil fight like a shit, but wasn't like that
2018-05-30 16:44
How was it then ?
2018-05-31 08:28
#328
 | 
Turkey ByMFG 
as quality of course finnish. as quantity probably USA.
2018-05-29 15:41
#341
 | 
Ukraine Samdi 
Finns do not need anyone.
2018-05-29 17:58
Germany, Finland imo
2018-05-29 18:00
The US, ofcourse. We are the best. The champs. Back to back. Think about it for a second yuropoors & commies. We are the absolute BEST. Most powerful nation on earth and will stay that way forever. #B2BWWChamps #BeTheBestFuckTheRest USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA!
2018-05-29 18:03
#372
 | 
Netherlands NL_CS_TOP_1 
+1 ty for liberating us
2018-05-30 13:09
#347
 | 
Australia Googgy 
STRAYA!!!
2018-05-29 18:09
#362
 | 
Russia v1p3rrr 
Brazil army ofc
2018-05-30 02:57
#365
 | 
Europe deVulse 
Well imo Germans had by far the best army, their manpower numbers werent even good in comparision to USA or USSR yet they fought them along half of the world at the same time and almost succeeded, fighting on 2 fronts and still managing defense for 3 years.
2018-05-30 12:21
Switzerland. They are so badass they don`t even need a fucking army and nobody touched them
2018-05-30 12:25
the mountains were enough
2018-05-31 08:46
yeep, that and the banks
2018-05-31 09:20
#371
 | 
Netherlands NL_CS_TOP_1 
USA USA USA
2018-05-30 13:08
#373
 | 
United States ascendaNt_88 
wehrmacht obviously
2018-05-30 13:09
#374
 | 
Syria Asiimov 
On how effective they were in combat, Wehrmacht The USSR army was just good because they swarmed and overwelmed the enemy
2018-05-30 13:10
#377
 | 
Faroe Islands Arismendi 
so many idiots 1. Germany 2. USSR end
2018-05-30 13:28
#381
JW | 
United States kingjeff 
AMERICA
2018-05-30 16:18
lol
2018-05-30 16:36
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
2018-05-30 16:59
+1
2018-05-30 17:58
#390
 | 
Brazil 1AxeL1 
Germany /end
2018-05-30 16:42
#395
 | 
United Kingdom LooseHS 
i think Belgium or Luxembourg
2018-05-30 16:58
Germany
2018-05-30 17:00
germany equipment was best
2018-05-30 17:52
1. American/Canadian 2. German 3. British 4. Finnish 5. USSR 6. Japanese 7. Italian
2018-05-30 18:03
1- Germany - Great technology usage and war strategies. Blitzkrieg could dominate every place in Europe, but GB and Russia. Probably could have gone a lot further if they didn't pick up fights with USSR, England and USA at the same time. 2 - USSR - Not much technology, but lots of people willing to die for their country. Weather made their territories almost impenetrable. 3 - USA - very good army but still economically recovering from 1929, what took them long to really get into the war. 4 - England - Perfect navy and decent army 5 - Japan - Very good pilots, but clearly not decent army
2018-05-31 02:20
definitely denmark.. f0k1ng pu$$1eS
2018-05-31 08:35
#411
 | 
Brazil ;---) 
the germany was indeed the best army this world has ever seen, fight until the end in 2 fronts its a difficult task
2018-05-31 08:44
#416
 | 
United Kingdom SLurSs 
Best army the world has ever seen is probably the modern Americans
2018-05-31 08:57
#423
 | 
Brazil ;---) 
i mean't the allies fight against, but yes, nowadays the american armed forces are strongest force by miles.
2018-05-31 12:27
#428
 | 
Sweden frozze90 
+1
2018-05-31 16:27
swiss army... oh wait
2018-05-31 08:46
nazi army
2018-05-31 08:53
#415
 | 
United Kingdom SLurSs 
Germany or USA
2018-05-31 08:56
#420
 | 
United States Venom_ 
obviously the great USSR just kidding of course France obv best army
2018-05-31 09:27
#421
 | 
United States flipfone 
Japan Strong enough to be able to sacrifice pilots and civilians. Strong enough hearts to know when to stop to save Japanese and American lives.
2018-05-31 09:28
Obviously, Great Britain. I am history teacher in Russia, don't even try to tell me that i am wrong
2018-05-31 16:27
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.