Thread has been deleted
Last comment
SK era is over. Who is next?
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
Clearly SK have not been the top team for a good while, their era is over. What is the next era incoming? Astralis? FaZe? Mouz?
2018-06-18 03:50
#1
NAF | 
Malta hurgurhut 
nobody this is a true era of great CS
2018-06-18 03:50
#8
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
+1. very nice competitiveness and unpredictable games
2018-06-18 03:53
#26
 | 
Brazil VFI 
great era means sloppy cs, stand ins and only astralis and liquid that plays with a brain?
2018-06-18 04:13
#48
cyx | 
Canada CyxDEADLOL 
+9999
2018-06-18 04:36
MiBR
2018-06-20 05:36
#410
 | 
Yugoslavia LeFt_SiX 
+10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2018-06-22 00:29
#99
TACO | 
Brazil LordQ 
+1
2018-06-18 06:29
#135
 | 
Ukraine EzSkillz1337 
U forgot GOD'VI
2018-06-18 11:08
You mean S1mple Vincere?
2018-06-18 19:43
burn
2018-06-18 20:24
s1mple & co.
2018-06-18 20:24
#213
 | 
Slovakia AdorrioN 
You mean Electronicus S1mplere?
2018-06-18 21:00
i like that one! :D lets make some Shirts :D
2018-06-19 07:08
+1
2018-06-18 20:41
+10000000, people dont realize that its the main reason why astralis dominate, theyre good but they would be so beatable if teams like FNATIC, SK, or faze comeback on form with a full roster and some training
2018-06-18 21:01
+1
2018-06-18 22:12
#357
 | 
Denmark MeToxi 
You could say that about every team that has dominated though.
2018-06-21 08:53
Flair checks out
2018-06-21 09:10
#361
 | 
Denmark MeToxi 
Including Astralis
2018-06-21 09:10
i think saying teams have a brain isnt the best way to describe it, you could just say teams that don't have a stand, just got confused is all, if youre wondering why i reply. also +1 to the rest
2018-06-19 19:36
#307
 | 
Brazil VFI 
yeah just a figure of speech but there are teams that are just playing puggy style and that's annoying
2018-06-20 05:47
u just described the 'era' of lum/sk
2018-06-21 03:14
+1
2018-06-21 08:50
#49
 | 
Portugal Flycomes 
Fan of Sk and realy want them back but yeah true
2018-06-18 04:36
yeah. era of sk is over. era of mibr is about to begin.
2018-06-18 07:37
#153
 | 
Netherlands Sander335 
Delusional much?
2018-06-18 19:43
there is a possibility so not really delusional
2018-06-18 21:19
#220
 | 
Netherlands Sander335 
So if I say NiP era is about to begin I'm not delusional?
2018-06-18 21:20
of course you are lmfao
2018-06-18 21:23
#223
 | 
Netherlands Sander335 
But there's a slight possibility, hence I'm not delusional, according to #219
2018-06-18 21:23
there is no possibly, not in accordance with #219
2018-06-18 21:41
#228
 | 
Netherlands Sander335 
Guess you're just biased
2018-06-18 21:42
Keep guessing
2018-06-18 21:45
haha. mibr signs current sk roster. so that definitely would be the end of sk era. that what I meant. but to be honest I still believe that fallen and co will beat the shit out of everyone. yeah. I think it would be much better to make stew learn Portuguese. Honestly I think Brazilian Portuguese is the smoothest after my mother's-tongue language out of total 6 that I can speak. I assume that after 1 month he'd be an upper-intermediate, so that was a mistake I guess. but they will find a way to greatness. and -boltz would be nice too. he's good, but can't handle all that pressure.
2018-06-19 10:50
#279
 | 
Netherlands Sander335 
I understand what you meant, but SK/MiBR hit their peak in 2016/17 and I highly doubt they'll get back on the same level as they were with Taco and Fnx on the squad.
2018-06-19 13:29
+1
2018-06-19 01:34
#257
 | 
Brazil niqui_nic 
+1
2018-06-19 03:28
#2
 | 
Brazil guilds 
Astralis sure tier1: Astralis, Faze and Mouz
2018-06-18 03:51
NaVi was pretty good as well recently, Liquid too but I dont think it's really tier 1 level yet
2018-06-18 03:55
All navi , mouz , faze , tl , fnatic ( maybe ) are tier 1 its just that astralis are like a class above most of them
2018-06-18 04:14
#38
 | 
Brazil Alexandeer 
Astralis tier0 others ppl are just plebs
2018-06-18 04:27
Tier0? I'd say tier S is a better name to GOD-tier
2018-06-18 11:02
#137
 | 
Brazil Alexandeer 
Yeah, i think is better
2018-06-18 16:13
1.Astralis 2.FaZe 3.NaVi 4.Mouz 5.liquid 6.Irrelevant cough fnatic dikheats backstbber dumb
2018-06-18 04:31
#145
 | 
Finland uzigod 
tier 1 is the top10 , not top3 :D
2018-06-18 18:52
#218
 | 
United States vakko 
+11111111111 those ppl braindead
2018-06-18 21:17
#151
 | 
Brazil killfell 
tier 1 is the top10 , not top3 :D
2018-06-18 19:43
#259
 | 
Indonesia AzZzzz 
Yap they are too strong, the others hard to against them
2018-06-19 03:30
#415
 | 
Denmark pistolen 
tier 1 is the top10 , not top3 :D
2018-06-22 00:34
i think that that 'era' is the best of csgo all the teams are being good and having goods tournaments
2018-06-18 03:51
#6
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
Agree man
2018-06-18 03:53
+1, could be better without stupid roster changes cough sk cough fnatic and no stand in issues. but overall amazing era, reminds me of 2015 csgo where u have 1 dominant team and other 4 teams that can compete and the rest are punching bags
2018-06-18 04:33
yes , now one tier3 can win to tier1 team online on in lan
2018-06-18 04:52
In LAN, it's very difficult.
2018-06-21 21:05
#206
 | 
Spain pootispencer 
Nip not having good tournaments, VP not having good tournaments, any french team having good tournaments. These teams hopefully go back to top tier, miss them much historic teams/scene. :(
2018-06-18 20:53
Pooteleport > pootispencer
2018-06-21 09:14
Nobody's won without contention. Even the top teams are losing to the lower ones. It's very competitive.
2018-06-18 03:52
yes , only 1 can win
2018-06-18 03:53
#5
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
I mean after dominating 2016 and 2017, destroying every team and gathering a lot of haters, they've left their mark is CS history as one of the most feared teams. But who is coming next!?
2018-06-18 03:52
ENCE?
2018-06-18 03:53
Astralis mb
2018-06-18 03:53
Nome of that actually happened though nt 3rd world
2018-06-18 04:03
#47
 | 
Brazil razorheadd 
it actually did they won 2 majors and dominated 2017, have coldzera and fallen winning #1 and #2 best players in 2016 and cold #1 again in 2017, just accept it
2018-06-18 04:35
SK were never good and never won a major, just accept it
2018-06-18 04:38
#125
 | 
Faroe Islands I_Oof_myself 
0/8
2018-06-18 10:53
SK didn't win a single major Luminosity did haHAA 12 btw
2018-06-18 11:03
2nd major of 2016... 0/8 btw
2018-06-18 19:37
FaZe top 1 Sk bottom 1
2018-06-18 18:32
#147
 | 
Faroe Islands I_Oof_myself 
+1 atm
2018-06-18 18:53
+10000
2018-06-20 06:00
#203
 | 
Sweden wyv0 
Dominating? Uh nope, SK won 4 tournaments in 2016, NiP and fnatic won 3 each despite being terrible 2017? Pretty sure Astralis and FaZe that competed in that year
2018-06-18 20:47
#166
2018-06-18 22:35
Dominanting?LUL.Not even half of the domnation that fnatic had.Fnatic were winning much more titles in a row and they were much more stable in doing soo.SK truly was the best team in the end of 2015,2016 and first half of 2017.But they weren't been much above that,they were just best team in that period,they weren't been dominant soo much.Especially not in 2017.
2018-06-18 04:35
#51
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
dominated, rekt, destroyed, all synonyms bruv
2018-06-18 04:36
In 2015 They haven't reach their best yet. 2016,maybe,just maybe. 2017-Definetly not.Faze was almost as good as them(I know Faze still weren't winning bo3-s against them back in that time)But they would get every final where SK didn't qualified for.(And they lost a of lot quarters and semis).
2018-06-18 04:40
faze was ALMOST as good as them
2018-06-18 04:42
That's what I said,right?
2018-06-18 04:43
Yep SK was clearly the best team and dominated 2017, dude they won 8 fucking tournaments
2018-06-18 04:46
#255
 | 
Denmark Drakem 
lolll wtf what r u saying dog my eyesss 0 iq 2016 - 2 majors 2017 - Rekt FaZe in all Matches bo3
2018-06-19 03:01
That's why io said in 2016 maybe,just maybe.And Fnaitc had 3 Majors and they were loosing much more consistent."Rekt FaZe in all Matches bo3"That still doesn't mean taht they had an era,other teams did neat them in bo3.It was only Faze.
2018-06-19 07:05
Ok,I don't wanna problem.I will just say SK TOP 1 2015,2016,2017.CRI IS FREEE IMBECILSS (I still do agree that they were best team in the 2016 and 2017(being just a touch betteer than Faze))But I just don't think they dominated that much.
2018-06-18 04:41
#59
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
you are entitled of an opinion
2018-06-18 04:43
Bah,I don't know,I just see a lot of the guys to get mad(With Brazillian flag) when you say them that you actually think that SK actually didn't have better ERA compared to the fnatic one.
2018-06-18 04:45
#69
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
I get it man. As i said in #5, i saw they dominate and be the number 1 in 2016/17, hence i say they had an era
2018-06-18 04:57
Fakeflagger HAHAHAUAHA
2018-06-18 06:46
No?
2018-06-18 07:02
lol
2018-06-19 06:16
+1
2018-06-20 06:02
There's still insane Brazilians who think SK had an era LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
2018-06-18 05:58
#95
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
nice try bro
2018-06-18 06:02
#144
 | 
Sweden ericlindberg 
trying to bait with this comment because the thread alone wasnt enough? pathetic
2018-06-18 18:50
I mean I forgot to type it and you can't really edit the OP so...
2018-06-18 19:33
#7
Xyp9x | 
Denmark Stvn_ 
Astralis era probably
2018-06-18 03:53
#13
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
I agree they are the numer 1 candidates
2018-06-18 03:54
#63
 | 
United States TriHardSeven 
Only if they can win this major, then it will be Astralis era
2018-06-18 04:45
#12
 | 
Brazil davidzor 
NiP, Fnatic, LG-SK and now Astralis
2018-06-18 03:53
#15
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
Astralis over FaZe with olof?
2018-06-18 03:55
The only reason astralis is the #1 right now is because the other teams are a shadow of what they used to be. Astralis #1 because other teams are playing with standins and in slumps, not because they are "truly the best"
2018-06-18 04:44
#116
 | 
Denmark ghostan11 
thats some next delusional
2018-06-18 07:26
+1
2018-06-18 19:50
maybe because thats the truth? Am I lying? Look at the state of teams right now
2018-06-18 21:57
astralis, mouz and faze is the only team who doesn't make a big change in 2018, thats why their still on the top while the others still trying to adapt with changes...
2018-06-18 11:18
I would say taking Magisk for Kjaerbye was a big change tho
2018-06-25 02:41
+1
2018-06-18 20:04
astralis era if they continue this form
2018-06-18 03:57
SK never had an era how can be the end!?
2018-06-18 03:58
#22
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
#5
2018-06-18 04:09
Fnatic dominated NiP dominated SK didn't. SK in 2016 only won 4 tournaments, which is FAR from dominating at all. In 2017 there was several tournaments where they didn't even get out of groups, including disappointing performances at both majors. Expected delusions from a BR flag.
2018-06-18 04:20
#43
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
#22
2018-06-18 04:35
I already countered that argument. SK didn't have an era. Expected delusion from BR flag.
2018-06-18 04:38
#72
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
No you didn't, #43
2018-06-18 05:29
Expected from BR flag. Just dodge when you have no argument left.
2018-06-18 05:32
#76
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
argument is in #5 bro lol
2018-06-18 05:35
And I already countered that argument. And yet you have had no real retort. Again, expected from delusioned BR flag.
2018-06-18 05:36
#80
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
You really didn't. SK dominated 2016-2017, they won most torunaments, constantly top1 and owning all teams. Just saying they didn't have an era and pointing out their fails and denying their achivements is not a counter argument
2018-06-18 05:39
Again, they were dominate, you have no argument for that. They won 4 tournaments in 2016. Faze has won 5 tournaments in the last 10 months, no one is calling them "Dominant". In 2017, they disappointed at both majors, and had massive slumps early in the year and shortly after the player break. At most tier 1 events they weren't "Dominating". Fnantic and NiP were dominating, they were winning almost every event they went to, and steam rolling most teams they came across. I don't need to provide a counter argument to their "Dominance" when you don't provide an argument to prove it to begin with.
2018-06-18 05:42
#85
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
Bro, it's just so simple, if you watched 2016-2017 you saw how SK were the top1 team, favorites in all events, and beat the best teams in the time repeatedly. They weren't the most consistent, but still were the most impressive team when CSGO was much more competitive than 2012-2015.
2018-06-18 05:44
False. In 2016/2017, the top teams were SK, Faze, Astralis That's really it. Other teams like VP or Fnatic popped up a few times but weren't consistent. In 2014/2015? Fnatic, Luminosity, Navi, VP, NiP, Envy, Kinguin, TSM, the list goes on. Again, expected delusional argument from BR flag. Last era was Fnatic.
2018-06-18 05:49
#89
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
You are entitled of an opinion
2018-06-18 05:49
Except I'm actually stated statistics and referencing things to backup an argument. The one who is just having an opinion is the one claiming dominance with no evidence to back up his claim whatsoever.
2018-06-18 05:53
#93
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
and that is your opinion bruv
2018-06-18 05:57
dude u got so shit on lol, give up already, he's proven u wrong
2018-06-18 19:52
lol nice try
2018-06-18 19:55
yea what did i expect, brazilians admitting a mistake, sk having an era is more likely than that (still no)
2018-06-18 20:04
#166
2018-06-18 20:05
#121
 | 
Brazil davidzor 
"In 2017" they disappointed at the 2 majors" The truth = Atlanta Major reached the semi-final with Fox, Krakow lost to Astralis because of an insane performance from Device.
2018-06-18 07:38
#83
 | 
United States LuLzZz 
I'm very close to say Sk had an era, but all they were doing is having dominate spurts in 2016 and 2017. Mid 2016 when the won back to back majors. Mid 2017 when they won like 5 tourneys, and at the end of 2017 when they won a few. But, overall it didn't feel like 2013 Nip or 2015 Fnatic, so I agree, no era. But close.
2018-06-18 05:42
#86
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
#85
2018-06-18 05:45
#123
 | 
Brazil davidzor 
Look at how many events Fnatic won in 2015, see if they won everything they attended. liquipedia.net/counterstrike/Premier_Tou.. - I counted 10 1st places.
2018-06-18 07:42
Fnatic played 21 LAN events in 2015 (Including low tier events) 1st at 11 2nd at 4 3rd/4th at 5 5th/8th at 1 When your worst performance out of 21 LAN events is going out in a quarter-final, that's fucking dominance.
2018-06-18 21:17
#225
 | 
Brazil davidzor 
Didn't knew that we had to count 2, 3rd places. LG/SK core - 2016 - 5 2nd place, 5 3rd/4th place counting @ premier events, 1 5-8th.
2018-06-18 21:39
And they only won 4 events in 2016. Not even comparable.
2018-06-18 21:39
#133
 | 
France FanchD 
+1
2018-06-18 11:03
+1 What a delusional Bra71lian fanbase.
2018-06-18 20:13
#18
 | 
Europe p1peb0mb 
Not this year.Maybe a team does it in 2017 just like there were eras in 2013,2015 & 2017.
2018-06-18 03:58
#20
 | 
Poland Htcobakel 
Tbh noone can dominate cs:go for a long time.
2018-06-18 04:05
#21
 | 
Argentina [Darkaren] 
No era mayb. Who knows, back in 2017 there was a while with no era either until SK started to win shit, Astralis wasn't attending to enough tournaments and some of them were won by VP so yeah. And in 2016 there was no era for a while either. Same with 2014... I think only 2013/2015 had a whole year era, with NiP and Fnatic being just overall dominant over everyone else, and still NiP kinda fucked up at the major and VeryGames did some shit too, just like Fnatic at the end of the year fucked up at Cluj Napoca and nV won some shit too... So yeah, Idk, let's say no era.
2018-06-18 04:06
#23
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
Fair points
2018-06-18 04:11
#24
 | 
Australia Lomcharton 
C9 when they get Olof :>
2018-06-18 04:12
#25
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
lul
2018-06-18 04:12
#28
 | 
Brazil thiagomrm 
Mibr Era xD
2018-06-18 04:15
#29
 | 
Brazil Jaoh2 
MiBR, ty
2018-06-18 04:16
#30
 | 
Brazil Collee 
astralis era has been going for months
2018-06-18 04:18
#44
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
not yet bro
2018-06-18 04:35
SK era LUL
2018-06-18 04:19
#32
 | 
Canada Herodionus 
By far Astralis, any tournament lately that astralis attends is not even a competition
2018-06-18 04:19
>sk >era pick one
2018-06-18 04:20
#37
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
yes that's what i am saying, sk era is over who is next, read the post dude
2018-06-18 04:24
NA era best era
2018-06-18 04:22
#39
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
xD
2018-06-18 04:29
tWo wEeKs
2018-06-18 04:40
#75
 | 
India hell_razerd 
Hahahhaha
2018-06-18 05:35
#211
 | 
Spain pootispencer 
liquid "era" > C9 "era"
2018-06-18 20:58
#36
 | 
Brazil El_Rod 
i think astralis too
2018-06-18 04:22
Astralis - Seens to be invencible nowadays.
2018-06-18 04:33
#46
 | 
Macedonia AstralisGoat 
What you mean who is next? Astralis.... 6 months of dominating every event they went 2 except 1.
2018-06-18 04:35
dont think hes been watching cs recently lol
2018-06-18 05:37
#92
 | 
World rainsje 
Final, 3-0, FaZe, Xizt....
2018-06-18 05:54
#108
 | 
Macedonia AstralisGoat 
Wow lost 1 tournament where they reached finals and won literally everything else they played in such a bad shit team.
2018-06-18 07:07
Vp obviously hahahaha
2018-06-18 04:36
SK never had an era 0/8
2018-06-18 04:42
#70
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
nice try
2018-06-18 05:28
I kno im late but you have been provne wrong like 770 times, can u just give up please
2018-06-19 01:43
STYKO era
2018-06-18 04:47
lul xD
2018-06-19 01:57
mibr era?
2018-06-18 04:51
#71
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
Would be crazy
2018-06-18 05:29
#212
 | 
Spain pootispencer 
New NaVi era, with marke going crazy awp suddenly, we all see it.
2018-06-18 20:59
#68
 | 
Denmark parpzz 
NiP, fnatic, SK, Astralis maybe but i hope NaVi or mibr
2018-06-18 04:56
CS go is dead
2018-06-18 05:34
era was over a long time ago. Astralis already started a new era.
2018-06-18 05:37
#82
 | 
Brazil Zixye 
I think that the unique SK era was in 2016, but now they just suck, but anyway the next era is going to be from astralis, because faze tilted every final and mouz is a good team but not even 75% of astralis
2018-06-18 05:42
#115
 | 
Brazil davidzor 
2017 was a better year for them than in 2016
2018-06-18 07:26
#122
 | 
Brazil Zixye 
hmm.... in my opinion, the 2 majors and the 2# in ECS and 1# in EPL was more them 2017, but yes 2017 was a good year for them
2018-06-18 07:39
They just placed 3rd..
2018-06-18 05:42
#88
 | 
Brazil mobydick11 
I personaly would hate to see a new era from any team. Look at the competitive scene right now, it's awesome, any tier 1 and 2 teams can gives us a great CS to watch. Especially when it's an BO3.
2018-06-18 05:48
#98
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
I agree
2018-06-18 06:26
Why play for a tag that did not give the house to play? MIBR is coming!
2018-06-18 05:50
#96
 | 
Australia t0rrent 
There hasn't been an era since fnatic era, you gotta dominate for at least a year to have an era
2018-06-18 06:03
#97
swag | 
Brazil Douplesxx 
SK dominated for 2 years
2018-06-18 06:26
#100
 | 
Australia t0rrent 
nope
2018-06-18 06:32
nice try lol
2018-06-18 07:00
How many events SK won in this "era"? They won two majors, when every other team had been in slump, and maybe 3 or 4 other events.
2018-06-18 07:05
much more events than any other team in those years, so yeah..
2018-06-18 07:16
How many?
2018-06-18 07:19
#124
 | 
Australia t0rrent 
Since 2015, the core lineup of sk was world number 1 for only 12 months constantly switching around in rank with teams like faze, astralis and vp for a short period. You can't claim that in their periods as world number they were dominant. Most of their tournament wins were just farming out tier 2-3 events. SK never looked as dominant as fnatic a few years ago or astralis now, even when they were #1 they were commonly beaten on lan by teams like astralis or g2
2018-06-18 10:50
#139
 | 
Brazil davidzor 
2018-06-18 17:18
#142
 | 
Australia t0rrent 
sry pal the proof is in the pudding: fnatic wins 16 premier tournaments in 1.5 years, dominating all throughout 2015 = fnatic era sk/lg wins 8 premier tournaments in 2 years, with the form they had from eaarly 2017 to mid 2017 they could be considered having an era if this period was longer but 3 months is not long enough to have an era
2018-06-18 18:48
Remember that in fnatic era the competition was A LOOOOOOT weaker. SK dominated in the most competitive era. SK era > Fnatic era easily my friend
2018-06-18 19:41
#267
 | 
Australia t0rrent 
Weaker competition is what defines an era for a team, during the time when sk was on average world #1, their competition was always right behind them or ahead of them for brief periods of time, this is not dominant
2018-06-19 06:35
which means in comparison SK much stronger than old NiP and Fnatic so yeah proves my point lol
2018-06-19 15:54
#288
 | 
Australia t0rrent 
How can you make that comparison? You can't define an era like that. a team having an era is defined by a team dominating for a long period time, which implies weaker competition. If the top few teams are all neck and neck and can win against eachother then, by definition, there is strong competition for the world #1. Now lets say the same few top teams are all MUCH better than they were last year but one in particular is thrashing all the other teams, here you have weak competition for the world #1. You can't say that because less can contend for world #1 then the scene is overall worse in ability to contend for world #1. It's all relative, low competition for world #1 is a must for defining an era
2018-06-19 16:12
yeah, in SK era the competition was much higher and they still dominated
2018-06-19 16:19
#294
 | 
Australia t0rrent 
literally what you're saying: SK's competition was in very close contention and they were still very far ahead. You realise this is a contradiction, no? Did you even comprehend what I wrote
2018-06-19 16:34
No. It's like in fnatic era their power was 9000 and competition was 6000 In SK era their power was 13000 and competition was 10000
2018-06-19 17:18
#297
 | 
Australia t0rrent 
so you're pulling numbers out of your ass to use as proof now, hmm ok
2018-06-19 18:30
it's called intuitive perception
2018-06-19 19:26
#302
 | 
Australia t0rrent 
sorry but in the real world we prove our points not trust someone else's "intuitive perception"
2018-06-20 05:10
And if you watched 2016-2017 you've seen more than enough proof lol
2018-06-20 05:34
#311
 | 
Australia t0rrent 
Been watching since 2015, sk/lg was never as dominant as fnatic. I remember when the idea that fnatic wouldn't make it to the grand finals was crazy talk, sk never had this prestige. BTW im not a fnatic or sk fan and never have been so I consider my perspective pretty unbiased, can you say the same for yourself?
2018-06-20 07:53
I can for sure my friend
2018-06-20 21:26
#274
 | 
Sweden ericlindberg 
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA DELUSIONAL
2018-06-19 10:57
xDDD mad NiP/Fnatic fan spotted xDDD
2018-06-19 15:53
#285
 | 
Sweden ericlindberg 
DELUSIONAL SK FANBOY SPOTTED
2018-06-19 15:55
xDDDD
2018-06-19 15:55
#393
 | 
Finland T3ME_ 
Hmm weaker competition back then ? Now we can say there was weaker competition when sk actually did something now when there is better competition sk is garbage so yeah , that weaker competition is irrelevant argument
2018-06-22 00:07
Wrong.
2018-06-22 00:17
#204
 | 
Brazil davidzor 
Fnatic won 11 events considered premier. SK won 8. About this era thing I actually do not care. If they had or not an "era" (sic) won't change the fact that they are a legendary core. I'm only stating that the gap isn't that large.
2018-06-18 20:49
#102
 | 
United States b7a 
Clearly Astralis, if they keep up this form for the next year or so and pick up a major along the way. But given how much more competitive the game has gotten since the Fnatic era, I realistically don't see any more teams having an era. I know you're gonna say LG/SK had one, but I wouldn't say they were completely dominant over everyone, except for the 2 majors they won in 2016. However, they didn't win any premier tournaments for the 10 months spanning between Cologne 2016 and IEM Sydney 2017. I'd say SK were quite dominant in the end of 2017, but they didn't win the Krakow major, so their era was March 2016-July 2016.
2018-06-18 06:51
Good arguments
2018-06-18 07:00
It's not an era if a team dominates for 4 fucking months lol
2018-06-18 20:01
#258
 | 
United States b7a 
Yeah, calling it an era is quite a stretch.
2018-06-19 03:29
Na`Vi again.
2018-06-18 07:00
Immortals coming up next? When?
2018-06-18 07:14
#112
 | 
Luxembourg alex24 
era ? between the 2016 majors... in 2017 they won nothing important but the december ESL finals.. and thats it
2018-06-18 07:20
#113
 | 
Brazil davidzor 
They won ESL Cologne, IEM Sidney, ECS, Epicenter all big lan events.
2018-06-18 07:24
#117
 | 
Luxembourg alex24 
tier2 events sorry
2018-06-18 07:28
#118
 | 
Brazil davidzor 
Ok kid
2018-06-18 07:30
0/8
2018-06-18 19:43
nice bait, brazilians are coming for ya
2018-06-18 19:46
ENCE ERA COMING BITCHES
2018-06-18 07:30
#126
 | 
Faroe Islands I_Oof_myself 
I think astralis tbh
2018-06-18 10:54
#127
MICHU | 
Slovakia S1W0 
VP is gonna be back stronger then ever mark my Words
2018-06-18 10:55
NAVI era coming
2018-06-18 10:58
#129
 | 
Croatia feelsbadmane 
next is envyus
2018-06-18 11:01
Will be the asian era
2018-06-18 11:01
#134
 | 
Russia v1p3rrr 
sk era ended more than a year ago when they couldn't win anything. Then they won some tournaments at the end of 2017 and that's all
2018-06-18 11:06
Not really
2018-06-18 19:44
#160
 | 
Russia v1p3rrr 
not really what
2018-06-18 19:52
SK era 2016-2017
2018-06-18 19:55
#239
 | 
Russia v1p3rrr 
2016 only if winning 2-3 tournaments means era ofc lul
2018-06-19 00:58
2016-2017, and possibly even 2018 if mibr owns
2018-06-19 01:27
#262
 | 
Russia v1p3rrr 
in ur dreams only
2018-06-19 04:00
It's highly possible, seeing how they rekt everyone is 2016-2017
2018-06-19 04:02
#138
 | 
Ukraine blingg 
Astralis hello
2018-06-18 16:18
#140
 | 
United Kingdom mrwhitey998 
Only Fnatic & NiP had era /closed
2018-06-18 17:19
lol
2018-06-18 19:50
#176
 | 
United Kingdom mrwhitey998 
I know, truth hurts
2018-06-18 20:17
#166
2018-06-18 20:18
#143
 | 
CIS MrEuroBlue 
Natus Vincere
2018-06-18 18:49
I would like to see s1mple dominating
2018-06-18 19:50
Asstralis
2018-06-18 18:52
#162
 | 
Romania Lucian1947 
MIBR era incoming
2018-06-18 19:53
I doubt it, but that would be awesome
2018-06-18 19:57
Funny to see how a lot of people get triggered when mentioning the SK era lol. Specially given you probably understand how in SK era the competition was MUCH HIGHER than in NiP and Fnatic eras. So yeah, you gotta live with it my friends :)
2018-06-18 20:00
We've been hearing this pathetic excuse for too long, find yourself another one, sk never had an era nt lol
2018-06-18 20:10
Excuses lol nice try tho
2018-06-18 20:13
#178
 | 
United Kingdom mrwhitey998 
2016 is the only time people say they had an "era" and 2016 was the worst year for CS since 2012 lol
2018-06-18 20:18
2016-2017
2018-06-18 20:19
#180
 | 
United Kingdom mrwhitey998 
LOL!?! How? 2016 NiP won the same amount of events. 2017? What, that summer run? Pff
2018-06-18 20:19
#179
2018-06-18 20:20
#243
 | 
Netherlands 072 
But it is not SK era. It was more like a brazillian era
2018-06-19 01:02
LG/SK era my brother
2018-06-19 01:28
#280
 | 
Netherlands 072 
That is better
2018-06-19 15:41
#172
 | 
Canada thelegend27 
ENCE signed, not allu
2018-06-18 20:11
mibr (after 3-5 months) or Astralis if winning major s1mple 1st place Top20 2018 HLTV /over
2018-06-18 20:14
astralis will choke in the major probly
2018-06-18 20:19
sorry but mibr can't do any era with Shitewie.
2018-06-18 20:20
they can do this without boltz
2018-06-18 20:42
SK Era = Error 404 (Not Found) giphy.com/gifs/brasil-nt-david-luiz-i-fe..
2018-06-18 20:22
hahaha 8/8 for the creativity
2018-06-18 20:25
Thanks! Don't forget I'm stating facts and not my opinion.
2018-06-18 20:27
Not really. SK era is obvious, anyone who denies it is either: A) stupid B) mad SK hater whose team got stomped multiple times lol
2018-06-18 20:30
C) Not a delusional Brazilian who lives in the past.
2018-06-18 20:32
#1, SK era is over.
2018-06-18 20:35
#184
2018-06-18 20:36
#192, nice try tho
2018-06-18 20:37
#193
2018-06-18 20:39
xDD
2018-06-18 20:39
#197
2018-06-18 20:40
Flipsid3
2018-06-18 20:30
lol
2018-06-18 22:07
#195
 | 
Faroe Islands memento_1 
my pug team is next.
2018-06-18 20:38
what era?
2018-06-18 20:41
#166
2018-06-18 20:46
competition was wigher than in nip era yes but for tier 1 teams the fnatic was more competitive than in the "sk era"
2018-06-18 20:51
never
2018-06-18 20:54
#394
 | 
Finland T3ME_ 
We can say competition in 2016-2017 was weaker than now and now competition is higher sk is doing bad But yea seriosly sk never had an era , winning few tournaments they attends is not domimating , they never had era accept it
2018-06-22 00:12
+1
2018-06-18 21:45
#208
ritch | 
United Kingdom Meffus 
WHO NECKS?!?!
2018-06-18 20:55
Which SK era ? They never had one ?! Only fnatic and nip had one yet.
2018-06-18 20:55
#166 my friend
2018-06-18 20:56
there willl be no era because teams are not dominate like the old days like fnatic used to play in 2015 or sk in 2016-17
2018-06-18 21:02
most likely yeah
2018-06-18 21:16
Astralis is rn, hav a chanc
2018-06-18 21:22
mby..
2018-06-18 21:30
#277
 | 
Europe p1peb0mb 
sk era was in 2017 only. in 2016 sk didn't won anything before mlg major and didn't won anything after cologne major. just like fnatic they had 3-4 months of winning events in that year. sk won 4 events,while nip and fnatic won 3 events. there was no domination.....
2018-06-19 12:03
#321
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
SK were more dominant in 2016, 2017 SK wasn't at the top consistently. There was no "era", just slightly accrued dominance over the course of a year, give or take.
2018-06-21 01:13
#355
 | 
Europe p1peb0mb 
SK was not. They just won 4 events that year compared to 8 events in 2017. If they were so dominent,then why did they didn't won anything for 8 months from 2016 cologne major to cs_summit 2017. They were like astralis last year. Having good placements like semi but not winning anything. Thats not domination. But in 2017 from april to december, they won 8 tournaments including 6 big events. That can be called as domination.2016 Sk won only 3 big events.NiP also won 3 big events in 2016 while fnatic and Navi won 2 big events each. In 2016,SK was not that great like in 2017.They are getting overrated in that year because they won 2 majors.
2018-06-21 08:50
#374
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
2016 was the year they won the consecutive CS:GO Majors, the biggest events they'll ever win. That is the only crowning accolade noticeable throughout their streak, but over the course of two years they were not at the top, they were around it -- sometimes topping the scene -- sometimes not. There is a reason NiP/fnatic are credited with having "eras" and that is because they were so indomitable, they changed CS:GO history. Being the number one team in a sloppy fashion for two years is not total, era-defining dominance, they were just the best team in the world overrated by fans; which is fine in theory, but not when it's being spammed widespread. Personally I agree that 2017 showed a more defined SK and they were well on their way to having an era by winning six tournaments in a row, but they lost out at the CS:GO Majors and flopped during the end of the year to FaZe clan. Thankfully both Fer and Cold were on point to stop NiKo and co. before they completely took them. The top four of 2017 were Cold, NiKo, Fer and then rain... Two from FaZe, two from SK. Whereas 2016 showed FalleN at the second spot and Cold at the first spot. In my opinion 2016 was the Brazilians most dominant period because of the back-to-back Major wins, but SK looked more refined in 2017. IT doesn't mean they need to be overrated by fans to have accrued an "era", because there was none...
2018-06-21 21:01
#377
 | 
Europe p1peb0mb 
Back major wins mean nothing.You can't call they dominated those period when after those majors wins,they didn't won anything for 8 months. They only won 1 big event between those majors. Even astralis won 3 big events in recent months. Those were just like that. Even C9 and Gambit won majors. Winning a major is the biggest accomposlishent a team and a player can get. Both stop overrating the winners by saying they dominated that period. They won majors like astralis winning 3 big events in 3 recent months.Its just that majors have more prestige. Also they didn't lost to faze in end of 2017.They dominated it. Only faze was losing to them.
2018-06-21 21:55
#381
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
Yes it is... CS:GO Majors are the biggest events in CS:GO and being a Major-winner is one of the best achievements. This still does not prove LG/SK ever had an "era" to begin with given how we've both inclined as to why.
2018-06-21 23:43
#417
 | 
Europe p1peb0mb 
They got the biggest achievements twice. thats doesn't mean they were dominating those times. If C9 wins next major, do u say that they were dominating in 2018.No... Same goes for SK. They had 2 good evens that and those were majors.But its not dominating. But what Sk did in 2017 is nearly comparable to what NiP did in 2013 and fnatic did in 2015.But SK are still below both of them in terms of domination in their own periods respectively.
2018-06-22 07:26
#424
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
"But what Sk did in 2017 is nearly comparable to what NiP did in 2013 and fnatic did in 2015.But SK are still below both of them in terms of domination in their own periods respectively." ??? So you admit SK did not play "era-defining" CS:GO?
2018-06-23 00:06
#427
 | 
Europe p1peb0mb 
The dominated in 2017. But NiP and fnatic way more dominant in their eras.
2018-06-23 00:59
#436
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
NiP and fnatic actually had "eras", which is the difference here.
2018-06-23 20:13
astralis
2018-06-18 21:42
#235
 | 
Brazil LukkasYuki 
Mibr
2018-06-18 22:13
Let's go!!
2018-06-18 23:30
#238
 | 
Brazil $anji 
S1mple era
2018-06-18 23:59
best player confirmed
2018-06-19 02:46
#240
 | 
Germany zeolikk 
Astralis era i tink
2018-06-19 01:00
#241
 | 
Netherlands 072 
SK had no era
2018-06-19 01:01
you wish xD
2018-06-19 01:33
You're so so so so delusional, you've been proven wrong by atleast 60 diff ppl here..
2018-06-19 01:46
#166 LMFAO Who is the next mad triggered SK hater!?!
2018-06-19 01:59
I dont hate SK? I love them, its just simple fact, they never DOMINATED, to have an era you need to dominate a certain amount of time, i'd say DOMINATE for atleast a year, and they didnt, my fav player is fallen cus he can create normal players into monsters, he's literally the most versalite IGL in the world.. Dont get me wrong, SK is prob my fav team together with navi but SK didnt ahve an era, i'd say it was EXTREMELY close to one though, but they choked too many matches and such. they didnt DOMINATE.
2018-06-19 03:27
Fair answer. It's arguable indeed. From my pov they dominated and 2016-2017 was SK era
2018-06-19 03:59
#275
 | 
Sweden ericlindberg 
Thats because you are biased as fuck
2018-06-19 11:00
same can be argued for those who say SK didn't have an era so...
2018-06-19 15:52
#284
 | 
Sweden ericlindberg 
no it cannot be said
2018-06-19 15:55
that's cause you are biased af
2018-06-20 21:26
#313
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
Post #312. LG/SK didn't have an "era", their "dominance" was wobbly and uncertain. They were simply the best team in the world at that time, not to be overrated with your own whims. Have a good day.
2018-06-20 08:08
#166 LOL xDD
2018-06-20 21:25
#242
 | 
Brazil lucasptwd 
Niko gonna go to mibr, he is in Sao Paulo for 5 days (mibr start is in 5 days)
2018-06-19 01:01
astralis
2018-06-19 01:56
I should change the title to "Who is the next mad triggered SK hater?"
2018-06-19 02:02
sk era never started
2018-06-19 04:07
#253
2018-06-19 04:21
I aint fucking fishing for a comment in a 200 post thread
2018-06-19 16:25
nice IQ
2018-06-19 17:16
It might be the NRG era in a year. Astralis is having their three month era right now. CS seems to go in waves like that now. Personally I just want C9 to announce a fifth so I can go back to figuring ways they are going to start winning or placing well again.
2018-06-19 06:40
Astralis era till they Start choking again lol... FaZe era afterwards With olofmeister back
2018-06-19 06:41
liquid incoming
2018-06-19 07:06
#276
 | 
Sweden swediztann3 
Red reverse
2018-06-19 12:00
#278
fnx | 
Portugal lovessd 
Astralis
2018-06-19 12:04
HELLO , astralis era is already happening , consecutive 3 TITLES & 1 GRAND FINAL
2018-06-19 16:14
Yep
2018-06-19 16:27
LMFAO not yet xD
2018-06-20 05:34
#290
 | 
Brazil Julio_Marck 
The next will be MiBr era. Again
2018-06-19 16:16
#300
 | 
Brazil Charizaldo 
Astralis
2018-06-19 19:34
Valve CSGO
2018-06-20 05:36
#310
 | 
Brazil Heske7H 
mibr era
2018-06-20 06:02
#312
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
"Clearly SK have not been the top team for a good while, their era is over." Being slightly dominant and not even the team at the very top for a wobbly two years doesn't warrant era-defining CS:GO dominance. It's arguable to call SK's success as "era-defining", but if you compare their success to the only two teams who have accrued an "era", then no LG/SK did not have one.
2018-06-20 08:06
Considering how the level of competition in LG/SK era was much higher, their era is even better than NiP and fnatic's era easily
2018-06-20 23:49
#322
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
There was no "era" as explained prior. You assume so based on illogicality and bias alone, nothing more. I don't need to check post #106 to understand CS:GO better than you currently do. Have a good day.
2018-06-21 01:14
You are clearly just as biased lol
2018-06-21 01:27
#326
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
I provided arguments and logicality, you did not. It's pretty well known by now SK's dominance wasn't "era-defining", people just like to assume so; mostly Brazilian out of fanatic bias. Try providing some instead of instigating bait by triggering people who actually played/watched CS:GO from 2012, but just from 2016... Have a good day.
2018-06-21 01:29
Says"have a good day" like the argument is over and then comesback to replay again xDD
2018-06-21 01:33
#333
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
I assume the argument is over given you're simply trolling with "SK having an era" given I have just explained to you the logicality of it.
2018-06-21 01:37
yea but your logicality is flawed so no need to keep countering it again and again
2018-06-21 01:39
#339
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
No it isn't. You assume so because you choose to deny it, to then go on trolling once again. Keep going. How far will you blow the horn?
2018-06-21 01:40
Bro it's fine, you can have your opinion
2018-06-21 01:49
#341
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
We both have opinions. Claiming yours to be factual when no arguments have been provided is still folly. LG/SK did not accrue enough dominance for "era-defining CS" which is factual when comparing it to the previous two teams credited with "eras". There is no need to troll HLTV when you are entitled to your opinion, which will be respected, if entirely illogical. Have a good day.
2018-06-21 01:52
Plenty of evidence have been provided across this thread, so yeah
2018-06-21 02:14
#373
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
There isn't one scrap of it. Good luck trying to find it as every post you've linked thus far prove nothing.
2018-06-21 20:54
#378
2018-06-21 21:59
#383
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
Doesn't prove anything. Find evidence, not biased excuses.
2018-06-21 23:45
#342
2018-06-21 23:46
#390
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
Still doesn't prove SK had an era.
2018-06-21 23:47
Just as you have provided no "proof" that SK didn't had an era, it's only your personal bias
2018-06-22 00:15
#400
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
I did indeed. Try again. More reading, less trolling.
2018-06-22 00:17
Wrong.
2018-06-22 00:18
#403
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
Really? Prove it. Thus far you've proven trolling is effective against kids, but not against those with the knowledge to shut your excuses down. Try again.
2018-06-22 00:25
I haven't seen any proof from you so... SK era remains
2018-06-22 00:26
#406
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
You refuse to read what I've written down because you refuse to look past your own nose trolling. Try again.
2018-06-22 00:27
I've read it
2018-06-22 00:28
#411
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
If you'd have read it, you'd have become smarter and realised the error in your ways. Read it again.
2018-06-22 00:30
Nop
2018-06-22 00:32
OMEGALUL SK won majors in the least competitive era of CSGO
2018-06-21 12:16
you mean MOST competitive era
2018-06-21 13:54
#364
2018-06-21 18:12
#372
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
No, fnatic's era was the most competitive. Again - no clue, have you?
2018-06-21 20:54
lfmao dude you are clearly some mad fnatic fanboy jez
2018-06-21 21:59
#382
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
No... I'm a "fanboy" of all teams, including LG/SK, I just have some common sense not to overrate that which isn't era-defining CS:GO. Try again.
2018-06-21 23:44
#378
2018-06-21 23:46
#388
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
Doesn't prove squat. Keep trolling others with your lack of knowledge.
2018-06-21 23:47
Sk never had an era .... they were dominant in 2016 and 17 but they never had an era like Fnatic 2015 or maybe rn Astralis could have an era
2018-06-20 08:14
#319
2018-06-20 23:49
#323
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
Doesn't prove SK had an era, it's your opinion. Read post #312 and educate yourself.
2018-06-21 01:15
#319
2018-06-21 01:28
#328
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
Spamming a useless post still doesn't prove your point. Read post #312 and educate yourself instead of baiting unsightly.
2018-06-21 01:30
#330 LOL
2018-06-21 01:33
#332
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
That post doesn't prove anything either. Try again without baiting.
2018-06-21 01:36
You've provided no evidence that SK had no era, it's only your biased opinion
2018-06-21 01:38
#338
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
I provided logical arguments as the only "evidence" needed here is common sense. Try watching CS:GO from 2012, not 2016. People might fall for your trolling, but I am not one of them. So you may try again.
2018-06-21 01:39
yep, I've watched CSGO since 2012 and plenty of evidence for SK era have provide here.
2018-06-21 02:35
#371
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
Evidently you have not if you continue to be eluded by such arbitrary things.
2018-06-21 20:53
This is a never ending and pointless discussion
2018-06-21 22:00
#384
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
Until you can accept logical knowledge, yes it will be. Want to keep trolling? Go ahead...
2018-06-21 23:46
Remember when c9 was a thing? they were considered dominant yet they had glory for about a week b4 they became trash. we'll see how long these "dominant" teams last b4 they get dethroned.
2018-06-20 08:14
Astralis rn obvi, Faze will never be terrible but they can have an era if astralis start being bad since thats the only team that can beat them
2018-06-21 01:30
#329
k0nfig | 
Turkey aesky 
there was no such thing as sk era and there is no era of astralis.Maybe if they win every event they attend at 2018 (including major) maybe they will have an era.There is still 2 eras fnatic and nip even tho there was no high level competition still everyone was playing at the same condition.
2018-06-21 01:33
SK era is common sense my friend
2018-06-21 02:56
#363
k0nfig | 
Turkey aesky 
SK won 2 majors in 2016 yes but nothing more they won like 1 big event that year so we cant count it as an era and in 2017 they never won a major if you will have an era you need to dominate and win like almost every tournament that you attend.you cant have an era just by only winning 2 majors in same year or without winning a major you need to win all
2018-06-21 10:58
#387
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
"SK era is common sense" No... no it's not. It's biased hokum. Keep trolling.
2018-06-21 23:46
#335
 | 
Denmark dakkedak 
Astralis been dominating for some months now, but wouldn’t say enough to call it an era. winning more tournaments, major especially, then we have an era
2018-06-21 01:38
#336
 | 
Latvia melnraksts 
astralis / navi
2018-06-21 01:38
I dont think Navi has what it takes
2018-06-24 02:10
sk era over, mibr era now
2018-06-21 02:22
Let's see!!
2018-06-21 02:45
#346
 | 
Armenia 1915 
Ence Era
2018-06-21 02:47
lol
2018-06-21 02:48
csgo grave 2016-20XX.
2018-06-21 03:05
what?
2018-06-21 03:13
#352
 | 
Turkey headshotk1ng 
astralis.
2018-06-21 03:15
#353
 | 
Netherlands Njit 
Well astralis era right now, but after that it will be mouz era, mark my words
2018-06-21 03:17
Not yet
2018-06-23 20:46
#439
 | 
Netherlands Njit 
It's 3 days later bro
2018-06-23 21:01
what?
2018-06-23 21:22
#441
 | 
Netherlands Njit 
I'm saying once astralis era is over it will be mouz era and you reply 'not yet' as if astralis era is already over
2018-06-23 21:24
not yet i mean astralis need to dominate for more time to be "astralis era"
2018-06-23 21:25
#443
 | 
Netherlands Njit 
Oh ok. Well I mean they won/got second in their last like 6 tournaments so I'd say they are pretty dominant rn
2018-06-23 21:26
I agree
2018-06-23 21:37
....k
2018-06-21 03:20
#358
 | 
United Kingdom shmilx 
Hoping G2 works maybe after the major if/when they add kioShiMa or ScreaM their era could start. Would be nice because usually top french teams are great to watch, when they're on form especially.
2018-06-21 09:01
would be nice to see G2 back to the top
2018-06-21 19:03
#370
 | 
United Kingdom shmilx 
Agreed, it's sad to see so many great teams (SK, Na'Vi, FaZe, G2, hell even nV had potential with a few changes) having frequent rocky patches in their form
2018-06-21 19:48
Maybe shox team with smithzz can be good like verygames was
2018-06-25 02:34
#359
 | 
Australia kenJJJ 
Probably NiP or G2 if they get everything goin the right way
2018-06-21 09:08
I dont think so..
2018-06-23 04:56
SK had an era? OMEGALUL
2018-06-21 12:24
nip and fnatic era with no competition? OMEGALOL XDD
2018-06-21 19:03
Saying 2015 was weak haha 2016 was way weaker and that is the year you idiots are most proud of SK hahah sad 2 lucky majors and nothing more almost All great teams from before 2016 had their star players with injuries and teams in big slumps like ENVY and Fnatic was dominat start of 2016 aswell they won 6 events in a row 3 of them in 2016 but then olofmeister had his injury
2018-06-21 23:48
the best teams of 2015 became oblivious in 2016 level of competition, fnatic, envy, the best of 2015 were shit 2015. The level got much higher
2018-06-22 00:35
#423
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
No it didn't. Stop trolling.
2018-06-23 00:03
Duh
2018-06-23 00:27
#391
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
Still trolling I see? Literally knows nothing about CS:GO... -.-
2018-06-21 23:49
learn before you try to teach my friend, you've been trolled and rekt for 3 days in a roll lol
2018-06-22 00:16
#404
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
The fact you assume so is hideously egotistical of you given you still haven't done anything to prove your claims except troll.
2018-06-22 00:26
It's been "proven" many times through out this thread, it's up to you to agree or disagree and form your own opinion
2018-06-22 00:27
#412
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
No, it hasn't been "proven" once, it's biased hokum. I've tried to be lenient, but you'd rather troll those who actually make valid claims against such horrendous fanaticism. The arrogance you display is so palpable, you literally bait every user who attempts to call out your lies, but it won't work with me. Try again.
2018-06-22 00:32
Same can be said to your opinion, it's biased hokum lmfao
2018-06-22 00:34
#422
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32 
You'd have to read it instead of trolling. Try again.
2018-06-23 00:03
xDD
2018-06-23 00:18
Astralis for sure
2018-06-21 21:06
nobodys era current cs is pretty stacked every top 4 team can beat each other
2018-06-21 23:49
agreed
2018-06-22 00:17
There will never be any team ERA again. Csgo is much competitive now for having just one team dominating.
2018-06-22 00:16
probably yeah
2018-06-22 00:17
#447
 | 
Brazil FaelEz 
Agree with you, but FaZe is very very strong I think that FaZe will dominate this year
2018-06-24 02:18
#409
L.K.S | 
Turkey xAiakos 
i wanna new team ERA not Astrails , SK , Faze , mouz, fnatic ,c9 we need new teamssssssssssssss ffs
2018-06-22 00:28
like who?
2018-06-22 20:33
#419
L.K.S | 
Turkey xAiakos 
i dont really know but , maybe NRG , Liquid , even TyLoo xD
2018-06-22 22:55
Liquid would be cool
2018-06-22 23:10
yes
2018-06-22 22:56
yes?
2018-06-23 01:19
yes over
2018-06-23 11:01
#428
 | 
Brazil SKu11 
MIBR
2018-06-23 01:00
If mibr dominates then it will be a LG/SK/Mibr era extended
2018-06-23 01:19
If mibr comesback strong then it may potentially be 3 years of the "SK era" wOw
2018-06-23 05:43
There never was an SK "era". 1 major and a handful of big tournaments. So what. Thorin and the other e-sports pundits just have to generate bullshit to keep the content flowing. There's never been an era.
2018-06-23 06:05
Thanks for your opinion
2018-06-23 06:19
Mibr era
2018-06-23 20:14
#446
 | 
Brazil FaelEz 
If Olof back, The New Dream Team is FaZe
2018-06-24 02:15
This team lost to SK many best of 3s i dont think they will be that much stronger
2018-06-24 02:24
#449
 | 
Brazil RaelG 
Mibr era
2018-06-24 02:30
Would be crazy
2018-06-24 03:22
#453
fnx | 
Brazil pedrola 
If sk era is over, you clearly dont know mibr
2018-06-25 02:48
Lul i didnt know SK had an era
2018-06-25 04:05
#455
fer | 
Brazil lordsawm 
Astralis so far
2018-06-25 04:12
WAIT. What era? Did I miss something?
2018-06-25 04:13
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.