NiP was dominant and winning everything for two years "consistently".
fnatic did exactly the same for one and a half years "consistently".
LG/SK's only redeeming result was the consecutive CS:GO Major championships, which they fell off after winning said Major.
NiP won all three $250,000 tournaments in 2016 and SK struggled like crazy in 2017, they were not even number 1 consistently... They had a stint with felps, then didn't. They had a stint with boltz, then didn't...
See the difference? It isn't "era-defining" dominance, it's just being the best team in the world for a short while, no consistency of dominance whatsoever. They were on their way to accrue one when they had won six tournaments in a row in 2017, but then they booted felps and couldn't do anything, going out in groups and the like. Some "era", right?
There is no "fact" SK has an era because it wasn't breaking records of being dominant for a year plus like the previous iterations, it's fanaticism by Brazilian trolls on HLTV and remains so.
The fact that you want me to look at results when you deny the ones that prove there was no era astounds me.