Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Intel or AMD?
Switzerland Forrial 
I am going to buy a new processor, i was considering Intel - Core i7-8700K 3.7GHz 6-Core, but maybe i should go for something else?
2018-08-16 21:58
#1
 | 
Finland jobodi 
intel bestest
2018-08-16 21:59
#4
 | 
Latvia pacanCSGOD 
+1
2018-08-16 22:00
#61
 | 
Finland jobodi 
AMD is only for people who can't afford master pc. GTX + intel = Gold
2018-08-16 22:28
#102
 | 
World ZMDR 
Ryzen Threadripper is $2k
2018-08-16 23:25
yes, and then they find some obscure facts they throw in peoples faces and actually learn to believe themself about how AMD is better, even tho intel + gtx is what they wish they had
2018-08-16 23:29
#144
 | 
Sweden Ch3eSy 
It really depends on what you are trying to acomplish: Pure gaming: intel+gtx Light production (video/photos)- depends on program you are doing your work in Pure work, sometimes gaming: amd+gtx
2018-08-17 12:06
+1
2018-08-17 12:11
I have intel + gtx but I wish I had amd lul
2018-08-17 14:25
then you must have like an i3 and a gtx 760
2018-08-17 15:19
lol no i5 and gtx 1060
2018-08-17 17:11
well shit if I had a 1060 I would wish I had something different too! no one with an i7 and 1070-1080 would say that
2018-08-17 17:56
#154
 | 
Slovakia eff4ce 
iphone
2018-08-17 12:26
intel obviously
2018-08-16 21:59
intel
2018-08-16 21:59
#5
autist | 
Poland dUNaSzo 
intel for gaming
2018-08-16 22:00
/there was a response, but the author edited it/
2018-08-16 22:05
#10
autist | 
Poland dUNaSzo 
what
2018-08-16 22:01
/there was a response, but the owner edited it/
2018-08-16 22:05
#13
autist | 
Poland dUNaSzo 
bruh no?
2018-08-16 22:03
/there was a response, but the owner edited it/
2018-08-16 22:05
#16
autist | 
Poland dUNaSzo 
spoko
2018-08-16 22:04
/there was a response, but the author edited it/
2018-08-16 22:06
I agree
2018-08-17 14:23
intel
2018-08-16 22:01
#9
 | 
Brazil KickFallen_ffs 
intel i5 better
2018-08-16 22:01
Kick ur brain cells ffs
2018-08-16 22:14
asking on a site full of retards and bandwagoners nice dude
2018-08-16 22:02
#15
 | 
Korea XigNw0w 
And better option for this kind of question is?
2018-08-16 22:04
so are you one of those retards and bandwagoners? I am asking this here, because this is a site on which are people who are playing games. So it would probably be weird to expect of some of them to have knowleage about pc's
2018-08-16 22:16
xd
2018-08-16 23:12
I see by your favorite player that you are also a man of wisdom
2018-08-17 12:08
he's streaming rn check him out
2018-08-17 12:11
+1
2018-08-17 12:24
AMD There's no reason to pay the premium price of Intel. Ryzen CPU 2nd gen are noice 8/8 and will last much longer.
2018-08-16 22:04
until you run into the frequent incompatibility issues with various software (games, etc) also heat
2018-08-16 22:07
>incompatibility issues None. Same architecture x86. >heat None. I think you're stuck in the past fren.
2018-08-16 22:19
yeah okay dude I constantly hear the AMD side crying about some game not working properly after a new update or some shit
2018-08-16 22:23
#58
 | 
Brazil oneS2 
Ryzen >>>>> Intel Multicore >>>>> Singlecore singlecore is a 2012 thing, the next gen games are all focus on multi core
2018-08-16 22:28
not a problem since before multicore gaming becomes the norm there will be the better option available for that too (Intel)
2018-08-16 22:35
#75
 | 
Brazil oneS2 
i agree that intel will improve the multicore, but for now, thinking in the next 2-3 years, amd is a smarter choice.
2018-08-16 22:41
i don’t have issues but i also have a big liquid cooler on it
2018-08-16 22:35
so it's not your opinion? If I constatly see people telling me Jundo92 is a faggot that loves to suck dick I should believe it?
2018-08-17 12:11
heat xDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDdd
2018-08-16 22:23
#103
 | 
World ZMDR 
Both invalid reasons. Only valid reason against Ryzen is weak single threaded performance, which most games with old engines use, like CS. Ryzen runs cooler than Intel now, and compatibility has never been an issue since ram compatibility was patched a week after launch.
2018-08-16 23:28
holy shit this has to be the most retarded comment in hltv history
2018-08-17 07:49
Checks flag, reads comment, and knows for sure. You ain't from Dubai, or Abu Dabhi, Because who the fuck there cares how much something lasts, y'all are insane rich.
2018-08-16 22:14
The thread is not mine.
2018-08-16 22:20
Intel AMD only good to cook eggs
2018-08-16 22:04
#23
 | 
Poland Arknes 
It's stereotype that AMD is hot, latest AMD processors are cold like the Intel's one
2018-08-16 22:11
intel cold? xD delid it or get 100C in stock in half of year
2018-08-16 22:24
"delid it or get 100C in stock in half of year" well thats not true, the default thermal grease on intel cpus are pretty good in terms of durability, that just cant transfer heat as good.
2018-08-17 09:25
i7 8700k is not cold at all lol, i have a liqiud cooler on it and when i do cpu heavy stuff like streaming or video encoding it hits 90 degrees rather fast. but ive overclocked it to 5 ghz
2018-08-17 07:02
U should consider undervolting then
2018-08-17 07:19
it already runs at pretty low voltage, its at 1.275v and thats pretty good for 5ghz. the temps dont really bother me since im not utilizing the cpu to its max that often, it usually sits around 50-60 degrees when gaming
2018-08-17 08:12
What mobo are u using?
2018-08-17 09:13
aorus gaming 7 from gigabyte
2018-08-17 09:14
#19
 | 
North America PapaOllie2x 
Ok so, Intel if you mainly focusing on gaming and if you plan on buying an Intel, 9th gen comes out in October so if you want you can wait. BUT with that being said, Ryzen by no means is bad at ALL. If you plan on content creating/streaming go with Ryzen the extra threads help so much pair it with a 1070 ti and you will really be set. BUT, if you go with Ryzen go with 3200/3000 MHz RAM it gives you better FPS.
2018-08-16 22:06
Thank you for your time. I will keep it in mind when i finally decide what to buy.
2018-08-16 22:19
he's retarded actually... + of intel: 1 better ips for like 5-10% (thats why intel will be faster than amd at same freq with same mount of core/threads) 2 higher OC (if K) 3 singe die (no infinity fabric or similar shit) - of intel: 1 price 2 thermal grease instead of solder (you will need to elid cpu to OC it to 5Ghz+ and get full performance) ---- + of AMD: 1 solder. cpu really cold even with OC 2 price/performance ratio 3 multithread performance - of AMD: 1 infinity fabric (high latency between 2 dies, you will need high freq ram to decrease it) conclusion: intel faster but even with 1080ti you will see difference in few unoptimized games bcoz atm bottleneck is GPU not CPU. AMD better in price/performance ratio.
2018-08-16 22:39
1080ti is bottleneck? Also seems like you know what you are talking, mind looking at my list? de.pcpartpicker.com/list/9hsF4q
2018-08-16 22:43
well if you playing AAA games on 1080p with low settings, cpu will be bottleneck. But if your iq higher than 20, it always will be gpu. good config. But i dont like xfx PSU (better go for evga/bequiet/seasonic/enermax) DVD/CD Writer ? :D duuuude)
2018-08-16 22:49
wow, you suprised my. If about anything i was sure i got the right psu. and the dvd is just a emergency way if i ever want to play my old games again (like heroes 3, gothic and so on, i have them on cds)
2018-08-16 22:53
get Heroes 3 on gog.com (circa about 6 euroes for complete), have fun with non-cd full version and jump into hota if you are that kind of H3 player. cheers!
2018-08-16 23:05
actually i am already playing on hota servers :)
2018-08-17 05:51
there are dvd to usb adapters btw
2018-08-17 07:05
#107
 | 
North America PapaOllie2x 
you are retarded
2018-08-16 23:52
cry is free
2018-08-17 06:52
#137
 | 
North America PapaOllie2x 
die
2018-08-17 09:26
+111
2018-08-17 00:13
#21
 | 
United States fatburger 
Intel
2018-08-16 22:08
AMD - best price for the non-gaming performance. Ryzen is basically a best choice for those who render videos or work with the stuff that requires powerful CPU with a lot of threads(in order to complete tasks fast and smooth) Intel - best for gaming. Better for work than AMD if you're ready to pay 1k+ USD for CPU.
2018-08-16 22:09
if you ready to pay 1k+ for cpu you should buy 2990WX for work)
2018-08-16 22:43
it didn't even beat Intel's Core i9-7980XE in all the tests(slightly overcame in most of them tho). New 28-core intel CPU will be surely better than 2990WX. However the price of 2990WX is kinda good compared to upcoming Intel.
2018-08-16 22:53
hmmm if which tests it didnt beat 7980xe? :D in gta 5? xD
2018-08-16 22:53
You have to read carefully. I said it didn't beat it in ALL the tests. For example, 7-Zip opening data(compression/decompression), RealBench Heavy Multitasking, HandBrake test(except 4K) VeraCrypt decryption. And since you've mentioned GTA 5, i9 beats AMD there(in games) too, it performs much better when you're playing a game and doing some WinRar unpacking of large files. Although i doubt someone would ever buy it for the gaming. Surely, due to threads and cores it succeeded in 4k video-rendering and had overall a better multitasking when many tasks like rendering, 7zip compression were used at once. So the new intel gen will surely beat it.
2018-08-16 23:10
oh... god.... xD you will spend 1.8k usd for cpu to "work" in 7-zip? You said "Better for work than AMD if you're ready to pay 1k+ USD for CPU" so mb check results in soft for work? Ofc single core still better on intel (not too much actually). And you said about 28 core... it will be differect socet (not 2066) it will be 2019 (zen 2 hello) and it cant work properlly w/o chiller.... wooooow so great cpu xD... at papper(
2018-08-16 23:06
On paper 2990WX didn't beat i9 in a lot of tests
2018-08-16 23:06
in tests which cant properly use multithread? well... wery important when you buying 32 core cpu
2018-08-16 23:08
So? The new 28-cores Intel will most likely beat 2990WX in multithread performance. Even though 2990WX would still remain the best price if it happened.
2018-08-16 23:13
why you even compearing it with 2990wx when it will be relized after/with next gen Zen cpus? This year (or early 2019) will be only 22core 2066 which will not be much better than currect top
2018-08-16 23:15
ain't it supposed to be released much earlier?
2018-08-16 23:17
no. check their roadmap
2018-08-16 23:22
and you said about 7-zip right? helloooo img.purch.com/r/711x457/aHR0cDovL21lZGlh.. if i check other tests you said i will see the same picture right?
2018-08-16 23:16
Compression i meant.
2018-08-16 23:19
28 core cpu ISN'T coming to the mainstream any time soon, the way that Intel builds cpus means that the price per core will be WAY higher than AMD. The one from the demonstration at computex isn't a new mainstream product (or a new product at all really!) it's just Intel's top of the range Xeon Platinum 8180 that's been unlocked and overclocked using an air conditioning unit (!!!) whilst drawing over 1200W of power. Intel cpus capable of clocks 4ghz or higher are waaayy off (although may be possible when they cut processes down to 10nm, which won't be happening til late 2019 at best)
2018-08-17 15:37
#24
 | 
Sweden godname 
INTEL
2018-08-16 22:12
#25
Thorin | 
Egypt True_ 
as others have said Intel king of Gaming. AMD better at some workloads but I reccomend Intel because I am guessing you will game a lot.
2018-08-16 22:13
i7 very overkill for basic gaming and stuff like that
2018-08-16 22:13
well, considering playing VR so i think it wont be overkill
2018-08-16 22:21
yes if you do vr i7 will do fine but you will need a good gpu
2018-08-16 22:22
already bought gtx 1080ti sadly 2 weeks before they announced the rtx 2k :/
2018-08-16 22:24
#117
 | 
Portugal tagerR 
The newer ones will only have ray tracing support, which is actually bs and it has already been around for years.
2018-08-17 06:45
If you want to take a look: de.pcpartpicker.com/list/9hsF4q the storage will be changed, because its just something random i just put in there
2018-08-16 22:26
yeah that will be perfect for literally everything for at least 2 years to come
2018-08-16 23:03
Quality comment regarding the thread: Fractal Design Define R6 is a nice choice for your tower case, absouletly love it. Can't give you any reasons for or against Intel/AMD though. I always went with Intel CPU's and never experienced troubles. Still doing fine with my i7 6700k but i only use my PC for gaming and standard stuff, so i can't tell anything about the reliability and performance when it comes to other special tasks.
2018-08-17 06:59
I say amd because we don’t know how long coffee lake will be supported when cannon lake comes out ryzen will be support for years to come on same mother board
2018-08-16 22:15
If its not supported anymore then it means we get no more updates or so?
2018-08-16 22:28
#118
 | 
Portugal tagerR 
Not supported = You need to buy a different mb socket for each generation. But AMD "support" will drop in 2k20 so that argument isn't valid in late 2k18
2018-08-17 06:48
AMD, Intel is NASA's backdoor to steal ur pornfolders.
2018-08-16 22:15
But what if i don't have such?
2018-08-16 22:16
then ur name checks out
2018-08-16 22:26
I have only traps in my pornfolders
2018-08-16 22:36
dats good 4 u medpack
2018-08-16 22:49
#33
 | 
Switzerland AlexTenebrae 
Intel I9 PogChamp
2018-08-16 22:18
#41
ScreaM | 
Dominican Republic casxd 
i7 with a 9 instead of a 7 xDD
2018-08-16 22:22
#50
 | 
Switzerland AlexTenebrae 
actually , i guess i9-7870XE will be decent for 6-7 years ,so why not if he has money
2018-08-16 22:24
cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core.. From what i see its not worth looking at that 11%, i could very well change the cpu i buy now when it gets 'old' to something new then.
2018-08-16 22:32
#72
 | 
Switzerland AlexTenebrae 
well, agree, anyway they will make new one next year, so this will be 50% cheaper :D
2018-08-16 22:36
This question should never be asked. The answer is ALWAYS intel.
2018-08-16 22:19
#45
 | 
Sweden aer1aL 
Expected from Ukraine brain.
2018-08-16 22:23
#60
 | 
Brazil oneS2 
+1
2018-08-16 22:28
Nt botzil We all know you can't afford Intel
2018-08-16 22:58
Your swedish brain has the effectiveness of an average AMD processor
2018-08-16 22:58
#88
 | 
Sweden aer1aL 
Which is pretty good on multi-core and uses less single-core on games, less than Intel at least. Your point?
2018-08-16 23:05
What is the point of 560 quadrillion cores if they all clock at 0.00000000000000003 picoHerz? That's my point. A hard one to conceptualize for a fan of BotshaBOTCEPS, I know.
2018-08-16 23:09
#111
 | 
Sweden aer1aL 
Retard, i assume? AMD excels on multi-core and almost is on par on single-core performance. What is your point again?
2018-08-17 06:18
AMD excels at nothing, other than selling their shit to brokeasses and people who don't know better. Like I previously said, what is the point of so many cores if they individually can't do anything?
2018-08-17 12:22
#156
 | 
Sweden aer1aL 
WHAT DO YOU MEAN IF THEY INDIVIDUALLY CAN'T DO ANYTHING YOU UKRAINIAN RETARDED PIECE OF SHIT They are almost on-par with Intel when it comes to single-core performance, but DESTROY Intel on multi-core. Do you even check the benchmarks of games, bro? If AMD's CPU-Usage is %50-%60 then Intel's is at least %85-100 ROFL.
2018-08-17 12:40
Wow you're braindead, expected from sweden, let alone a fan of pashaBOTCEPS lmao. "They are almost on-par with Intel when it comes to single-core performance, but DESTROY Intel on multi-core" Proof? Where is your evidence, pasha fanboy? " AMD's CPU-Usage is %50-%60 then Intel's is at least %85-100" Yes because AMD shitcessors can only use 50% of their value, just like you only use 50% of your brain.
2018-08-17 13:49
#170
 | 
Sweden aer1aL 
Check cpubenchmarks, YouTube, i'm not going to waste my time by linking a braindead person. But oh well, there you go just for the sake of it: youtube.com/watch?v=gMSTXItiNVs Look at that multi-core rendering, AMD blows Intel out of the water while ALMOST on-par on Single-core rendering. Your point? Also edit #2: Notice the CPU usage on gaming, AMD is always at half while Intel might bottleneck on BF1 64 player multiplayer, arsehole.
2018-08-17 13:58
#158
 | 
North America Foxaika 
aer1aL isn't wrong though. While Intel does have an advantage in games and better single core performance, AMD's CPU performance post-Zen launch isn't that far behind, and with more cores, and a more affordable price, it's a great value proposition depending on the expected workload.
2018-08-17 13:36
#113
 | 
North America Foxaika 
If you're an uninformed consumer.
2018-08-17 06:27
Expected from NA
2018-08-17 12:20
#157
 | 
North America Foxaika 
Expected to know about being a better consumer?
2018-08-17 13:33
Yes
2018-08-17 13:46
#38
f0rest | 
Portugal Azuma11 
If u only game go for intel. If you want to game, render videos or work go for amd ryzen 2700x is cheaper and comes with a decent cooler. For intel you will need to spend extra money on cooler. Also it has 8 cores so it's a "future proof". I bought 1 ryzen 2700x 4 days ago. Edit: i say people saying that AMD overheat. Well i was playing gta 5 yesterday and the temperature was 58ºC. Not stock cooler tho.
2018-08-16 22:24
I am going to buy Thermalright - Le Grand Macho RT 73.6 CFM CPU Cooler
2018-08-16 22:22
#43
 | 
Sweden aer1aL 
AMD is Finewine, Intel is only for gaming.
2018-08-16 22:23
#46
 | 
Europe Nagardien 
First of all check your motherboard socket
2018-08-16 22:23
ASRock - Fatal1ty Z370 Gaming K6 ATX LGA1151 Motherboard
2018-08-16 22:27
#52
 | 
United States n3h 
Intel easily. But AMD is catching up and may even surpass Intel in next year or 2. Since they have went straight for 7nm tech and intel are at 10nm chips.
2018-08-16 22:25
thats why i am not sure. I also heard that amd got the 7nm and intel is having problems with 10nm
2018-08-16 22:26
#65
 | 
United States n3h 
If your looking to upgrade right now, 8700k for sure.
2018-08-16 22:30
I have a Ryzen 1800x. Bestest ever.
2018-08-16 22:25
intel for rich amd for poor
2018-08-16 22:25
#63
 | 
Brazil oneS2 
br brain
2018-08-16 22:28
#59
KRIMZ | 
Slovakia Chaoooss 
If u want to save some money then go for i5 8600k its comparable to i7 8700k and its like 100€ cheaper.
2018-08-16 22:28
cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core.. from what i see its just 6% better so you are right, but i guess for just a 100e more i still go with i7, but thanks for help m8
2018-08-16 22:35
#119
 | 
Portugal tagerR 
8700k owner, you won't regret it.
2018-08-17 06:51
of course if money are not problem then go for i7 dude
2018-08-17 12:01
#64
 | 
United States NoriZ 
Go for it.
2018-08-16 22:29
#66
 | 
Switzerland veach 
ddr4
2018-08-16 22:31
intel
2018-08-16 22:38
gaming = intel rendering, streaming and general tasks = ryzen
2018-08-16 23:01
#94
 | 
Turkey NewDeadlyS 
For game : of course amd I got 80-250 fps in cs:go with amd a 7870k apu system(All System 300$)
2018-08-16 23:10
#105
 | 
World ZMDR 
like everyones already said, intel for gaming, amd for everything else.
2018-08-16 23:30
#106
 | 
Israel Kp$ 
Intel numba 1
2018-08-16 23:37
best comment today made me lol
2018-08-17 13:54
I'm getting a ryzen 5 2600 today, i'll use it for modelling, rendering, compiling maps, music producing/recording, drawing and gaming, maybe streaming too. If you do other things than gaming you should get a ryzen. Don't listen to retards who only used intel, when those i5 and i7s work at %90+ new ryzens are below %50 cpu usage and performing about the same. In the future ryzens will be relevant, but i'm not that sure about old gen intels.
2018-08-17 06:19
#121
 | 
Portugal tagerR 
Never saw my 8700k go above 50% of usage, weird shit.
2018-08-17 06:53
I'm talking about older/cheaper models. Of coursef if you spend that much money it's gonna be like that. At those low price points it's always amd that wins all the benchmarks.
2018-08-17 10:42
#163
 | 
Portugal tagerR 
Well, but those are older and cheaper models, Ryzen is pair on pair with intel and is usually a more Budget friendly choice (2200g comes to mind) and of course, fx was... ye..
2018-08-17 13:43
#114
 | 
United States lockerboit 
ryzen better for csgo, intel for other games as well
2018-08-17 06:31
wait for new generation intel or if you buy now then amd. intel has massive security problems and they get their superior performence by not letting the cpu perfom security measurements. when those bugs will be patched you will have lower performence than you paid for. zdnet.com/article/beyond-spectre-foresha..
2018-08-17 06:38
#116
 | 
North America Foxaika 
Depends on what your workload is going to be and your budget. I would go with an Intel CPU is you're purely gaming and you have the money. That said, if you're going to be doing a few different things(video editing, rendering) AMD might be worth a second look. Really, there is no bad choice here right now. Ryzen is perfectly capable and efficient, and Intel is basically the same as they've always been. It's a good time to get a new CPU--lots of options. I'd do your research personally, really. Have to go over your own specific use case and make the choice that way.
2018-08-17 06:42
if u want to stream/code/3d model/make videos pick amd ryzen, they have 10% less fps in games, but 20% better in that tasks
2018-08-17 07:02
its 2018 people, we have 4k gaming in our hands. CPU DOESNT MATTER THAT MUCH ANYMORE. GPU MATTERS. there is absolutely no difference between intel and amd when you compare them in 4k resolution. If you want to play in HD resolutions, buy whatever you want, you will have to buy something else in like 1-2 years anyway..
2018-08-17 07:07
You are considering best chip on market for gaming ( stock ) and still consider amd? AMD is only for budget pc's. Clearly you dont have this problem.
2018-08-17 07:24
Ever heard of threadripper 2990wx ?
2018-08-17 10:44
Worse than coffee-lake for gaming purposes
2018-08-17 11:11
It's not designed for gaming obviously, what are you going to do with 32 cores, play cs ? lol
2018-08-17 14:33
#184
 | 
North America Foxaika 
I think he's making the point that AMD isn't for budget purposes only, and that to say that is misinformed.
2018-08-17 14:45
i9 9900k
2018-08-17 08:18
intel all the way man! how is this even a discussion ffs
2018-08-17 09:16
#160
 | 
North America Foxaika 
Because there's good competition in the CPU space, and being a good consumer is considering all options, not going with the mainstream necessarily.
2018-08-17 13:40
in general yes. but AMD sucks balls! I would never put and AMD processor in my computer, cuz I am not mad :) he asked for opinions. I gave him mine :)
2018-08-17 13:43
#174
 | 
North America Foxaika 
I guess, but a fact and logic based opinion would be prudent when it comes to purchasing decisions.
2018-08-17 14:08
here is some logic. this is a forum were people are likely to have a gaming machine, cuz this is a website which focuses on a video game. almost everyone in this thread replied "intel"... which means that a large portion of the gaming community prefers intel. if gamers prefer intel, thats a strong sign to me that intel is better for gaming. makes sense, doesnt it?
2018-08-17 14:12
#177
 | 
North America Foxaika 
Preferring a particular brand has nothing to do with whether or not it'd be better for certain use cases, which the op doesn't specify. There are plenty of poorly formed opinions and shills here. Hence why looking at benchmarks and the like and coming to a rational conclusion is sensible. Mob opinion is fallacious and silly.
2018-08-17 14:22
so there is no logical reason why the gaming world prefers Intel over AMD? I find this hard to believe. There might be some AMD processors which are better then Intel processors, maybe from some generation of whatever, but over all, Intel was always preferred. same with GPU. I know almost no one who doesnt prefer Nvidia....
2018-08-17 14:25
#181
 | 
North America Foxaika 
You've completely missed the point here.
2018-08-17 14:26
I understand what you are saying. but then its stupid in the first place from the OP to post such a question on an internet forum. you will probably not get an informed and good opinion. you should read tests from different sources and so on....
2018-08-17 14:28
#185
 | 
North America Foxaika 
Now that, I don't disagree with. Being a good consumer is about doing research. Posting on HLTV is only going to get you so much.
2018-08-17 14:46
+1 bro
2018-08-17 14:46
#135
XeqtR | 
Norway ripazha 
If you can afford it, go for Intel. If you are on a budget however, go for AMD.
2018-08-17 09:20
Intel for gaming, AMD for work, editing etc. AMD works for gaming, but doesn't perform at the same level with intel
2018-08-17 10:46
#143
 | 
Japan hirohito 
8700k or wait for i9 9900k also, if you haven't got graphics card, buy the 1080ti, not the 2080 and jump from ti to ti, wait for 2080ti and sell 1080ti
2018-08-17 12:07
#146
chrisJ | 
Netherlands blonde 
If you do not have an oven in your home, AMD...
2018-08-17 12:10
#159
 | 
North America Foxaika 
Modern Intel CPUs run hotter than Ryzen chips.
2018-08-17 13:40
#164
chrisJ | 
Netherlands blonde 
Not even...
2018-08-17 13:46
#171
 | 
North America Foxaika 
Check some benchmarks, if you don't believe me. Coffee lake is known to run particularly hot. arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/10/intel-co.. There are several articles that highlight this.
2018-08-17 14:06
#172
chrisJ | 
Netherlands blonde 
nvm intel>amd, always.
2018-08-17 14:06
#173
 | 
North America Foxaika 
lol, shilling for a corporation
2018-08-17 14:07
#153
 | 
Faroe Islands YesntNamer 
amd is good if you're under a budget otherwise intel > amd
2018-08-17 12:25
AMD, you get the same amount of frames from a $150 AMD processor as you do a $400 Intel processor. If you're rich as fuck and got money to burn still go AMD and buy a threadripper
2018-08-17 12:33
amd rn
2018-08-17 13:41
AMD: Budget Intel: 200$+ and for all who now come with threadripper: Every seen a game using 16 cores efficient?
2018-08-17 13:51
I just bought 2600, I was about to get 8700 and then I read news that new bugs were discovered so I was like "yeah, this is a sign to not buy intlel"
2018-08-17 13:52
#176
 | 
Russia TheWizzard 
Intel ofc + nvidia
2018-08-17 14:14
Intel if you indted to go all out with getting best pc and overclock it. AMD is mostly just cheaper budget solution.
2018-08-17 14:46
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.