Thread has been deleted
Last comment
my pc AMD
Brazil PrettyMuchIt 
So i bought this PC in 2013, AMD FX 8150, 16gb RAM, GiGABYTE 970FX (or something like i forgot really), and at the time i had GTX 250 now i have GTX1050ti (the only thing i updated in it), and a Corsair H100. 5 years and i'm far from buying a new pc. So many new stuff but i can run everything i want fine. The question is, why do people spend so much money with PC when you can have a good one for over 5 years running everything? PS: please don't say running 300 fps is different from running at 100 FPS.
2018-08-21 14:57
China VeryDongBeiGuy 
FX cpu's are known for giving very bad FPS in csgo.
2018-08-21 14:59
Cs go game sucks with every new update
2018-08-21 15:02
You might be happy with running things on low settings or may not notice some problems that other people see. I used to have a 8320 before I upgraded to a 4790k, the main reason for me was single core performance of the FX series is really bad, so bad that some games are just impossible to run such as Red Orchestra. A lot of people overspend simply because they are uninformed and don't do the proper research. If you're happy with what you have then there is no need to upgrade, but if you are going to upgrade I would suggest upgrading your CPU first, to either Ryzen or an i5.
2018-08-21 15:07
Brazil PrettyMuchIt 
I run everything on very high dude. edit: i mean everything i need. I don't know what games are the hardest to run these days, i mostly play Just Cause 3 and CSGO.
2018-08-21 15:10
Your CPU would struggle with a lot of games, not even new ones. Even Civ V would have a tough time on larger maps. I mean, if you're happy with what you have then cool, no worries. But JC3 doesn't exactly require high end hardware and CSGO is well not really that intensive.
2018-08-21 15:13
Brazil PrettyMuchIt 
Just explain me something i really don't udnerstand. The i7 you have has 4 processors, and AMD FX 8150 has 8. I realise the i7 is better, but how is that possible? Even with better processors, it's half of it, i try to understand it but i don't. Can you explain me how this work, superficially?
2018-08-21 15:16
3/10 mate . had a short moment where i was thinking about to answer this shit
2018-08-21 15:26
Basically each core of the FX CPU is really weak but when all cores are working together it is better than an i7 3770k. You can see this advantage in things like video editing and other programs that use multiple cores properly. Games are not like that and still rely heavily on what one core can do. I'm not saying that games only use one core, but you can't split a process onto two cores which is why if a CPU has better single core performance it will generally be better for games. If I remember right, the way the FX series work is that each core shares resources with another, so Core 0 and Core 1 both share cache and such. Some people say they are technically not real cores or whatever. But they work best for multi-threaded programs. The way an older 4 core i7 works is that it has 4 real cores and hyperthreading. Hyperthreading is basically what Intel does to get double the threads, they do this by having each core virtualise two cores so your OS sees 8 threads instead of 4. This is not as fast as 8 real cores but in some situations it can be much better than 4 real cores. You can never directly compare different processor architecture to each other as there are many things that make them completely different. Clock speed and core count isn't everything. edit - maybe I make small error in some of this, it's been a few years since I was really into hardware but it should be mostly correct
2018-08-21 15:35
Brazil PrettyMuchIt 
Very useful, thanks
2018-08-21 15:38
Brazil bruno4tw 
ryzen 5 2600 rx 580 8gb be happy
2018-08-21 15:09
Portugal ItsAvenn 
Up i have the same gpu, but my cpu its r5 1600 same shit than 2600 in some apps
2018-08-21 15:18
running 300 fps is different from running at 100 FPS.
2018-08-21 15:20
running 300 fps is different from running at 100 FPS
2018-08-21 15:23
Japan hirohito 
running 300 fps is DEFINATELY different from running at 100 FPS
2018-08-21 15:28
please don't say running 300 fps is different from running at 100 FPS. if you dont see any difference you are a total fuckwit
2018-08-21 15:45
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.