There are more than 2 genders, that's a scientific fact that's undisputed among educated communities including the scientific community. A few seconds on google scholar could show you this, but obviously, you're too scared to look at peer-reviewed literature that contradicts the shit YouTubers have brainwashed you to believe. It's only disputed by far-right retards on the internet. In fact, I don't want to give you an aneurysm, but even sex isn't totally binary. You would know that if you knew biology passed the 8th-grade level.
Funny you claim far right is logical and then say an anti-tautology. An anti-tautology is as illogical as any proposition can possibly be.
Every race is equal, assuming, of course, you use the correct definition of equality. It's blatantly obvious by anyone who knows the English language, for anyone who has studied philosophy, and for anyone familiar with political analysis, that 'equality' in the ethical sense means 'equal consideration of interests.' As that is all it possibly could mean. Utilitarianism is the only normative theory that has empirical import, meaning what matters in normative moral propositions is the interests or preferences of the relevant parties. Which, of course, means ONLY the preference/interest matters, and not whose interest it is. So, race/sex/species/orientation/nationality etc are all morally irrelevant. They are merely categorical devices and thus cannot have moral relevancy. This is tautological. To deny it is to state an anti-tautology, which would be the logical equivalent of stating 2=3. So either you fail at logic a chimp could understand, or your understanding of the English language and political discourse is so embarrassingly poor that you think 'all races are equal' means 'literally equal' as opposed to 'equal consideration of interests.'
And no leftist says rich are bad or migrants are good. Your understanding of politics is so infantile it's just pathetic. Organising an economy so that it only benefits the wealthy is bad, which is what we've done. It isn't free market capitalism at all, it's entirely rigged. As demonstrated quite clearly by one of the worlds leading economists Dean Baker.
Trump's policies and conservative policies overwhelmingly hurt the poor more than the wealthy, while almost all his voters are poor. So they are voting against their own self-interest and deluded enough to either think they will someday become rich or that the rich will look out for them. Voting against self-interest is logical now? They're all voting for conservatives because they're brainless, gullible, and extremely easily manipulated by the rich. There's a reason Republican voters are low IQ and have no education - because the Republican party explicitly targets dumb people they can manipulate with 4th grade English and fear-mongering about immigrants. Conservatives are, by definition, illogical and emotional because that's who the party leaders target.
Migrants aren't good or bad, they're just people. And discriminating against them because of their skin color or religion has no basis in logic, it's just emotional. Logically, their interests matter just as much as anyone else's. And denying refugees seeking asylum is against international law and national law in the U.S. Especially cruel to not allow refugees into the U.S. given that most of the conditions they are fleeing from were created by U.S. policies.
Leftism is all about logic, that's why mathematicians and scientists are almost exclusively liberals. There is a reason not a single member of the National Academy of Sciences is a conservative.