someone do my homework im lazy
Higher tax -> better welfare and we can take in more refugees who are in need of saftey, shelter and food!
- someone has to pay refugees and all those unemployed sjws
the us has very hard punishments but still very high crime))
Why the fuck would I argue for something I don't believe in.
I'm definitely for harder punishment, Norway is a joke when it comes to criminals and punishments etc.
Just use some big words and play with your intonation, thats how you win a school debate
If taxes are higher, things such as healthcare and education could be really cheap or even free.
Instead of strict punishments for criminals, rehabilitate them and make them functioning members of society.
Btw I stand for lower taxes and capital punishment, just trying to help you
Higher taxes help the collective good because the government has more money to spend on school and roads and such
and soft punishment gives people the chance to recover and become a better person (also costs less because theyre not staying in jail so long)
Higher taxes -> better military -> invade smaller countries and steal their resources -> your country is
lowering taxes means increasing the monthly income of the people which will lead to more spending which will lead to benefit to the economy which will help the country grow
if the crime rate is increasing, harder punishment will not help lower the crime rate.If the crime rate of your country has increased it's because of the refugees if u look at the statistic and who is the detained person by ethnicity-you can prove that the crime rate is artificially increased by bringing these refugees in your country.So it's better to make new vast prisons and increase the policemen in the hot areas where the refugees are.And by law u can deport any non swedish who commit a crime.
Call someone "bitch", best argument ever
yall niggas gay the best arguement
cant help you cuz youre wrong
when your opposition say something just go REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Call them facist nazi racist islamaphobe white-supremacist patriarchal anti-semite
lowering taxes may give incentive for new entrants (business') into markets, however the money it cost to tax a potential larger amount of firms may cost the government more to collect than it will earn with lowered taxes, or net less profits as result of lowered taxes. This would mean that money/resource will not be allowed to be allocated as efficiently creating an opportunity cost, as resources will be given to collect tax, which could be put else where for more effect - potentially creating a net welfare lost to society via the resources/money being unable to be put into a positive aid in society.
Harder punishments for criminals could make rehabilitation of criminals harder, meaning that after leaving jail some of these ex criminals may seek to act out on their vengeance onto society, potentially committing more crimes. Study's show that harsher punishments tend to show correlation with higher crime rate, more harsh punishments therefore do not aid lowering crime rates - as studies would suggest.
U need high taxes so u can pay for unemployed useless brainless SJW retards to live at home and eat kebab and microwave pizza every single day because they are fat slobs. Then they are free to complain about irrelevant shit and to make up new genders
so you are arguing in favor of the ultra cuckening that is happening right now in Sweden, have fun
just say how much u love trump, hate 3rd wave feminism and how islam is a dangerous religion and see the magic happen
half of the leftists in the debate outrage and destroy themselves
then you calmly settle with your points
make the opponent angry first > an angry person loses his temper ; makes mistakes ; cant get his point through right >> loses arguement
just do what our government does
So against lowered taxes, you can say that it helps the nation etc.
(i'm not going in detail, because i'm lazy atm)
Against harder punishment - you can say that if someone would be sent on a deathrow/life sentence, he has his life wasted unless police tries to check it again. Obviously there's no coming back from deathrow (you're very lucky if they let you out tbh), but imagine being in jail/prison for 20+ years or even 10 years being innocent.
give me some of your nice delicious swedish Kötbollar and I will tell you what to do!
For the punishment debate.
You can start the in modern civilizations, governments are not looking for punishments rather for a system to re-educate criminals so they can reincorporate their society and be useful and good citizens. So the point is not to ruin a prisoner life with longer sentences rather with more efficient systems to "convince" criminals to leave the criminal life behind.
tell that rapefugees wont be able to come with lower taxes
same goes with higher punishment for them
tolerate captain sweden will mark u as a winner
maybe debate about refugees instead of ur stupid shit
talk about your belief(?) in society and socialism and the belief that people change over time given proper counselling
Idk qbout salary but copy norway for punishment
low taxes: public services need money so lowering taxes reduces the quality of public services bla bla bla
harder punishments: costs more to the country to keep prisoners in a long time. good thing to let prisoner free faster so they get work and pay taxes to the country instead or wasting money in prison
Sorry, I support FOR on those topics.
why against harder punishments,are you forced to go against them?In this case,I'm sorry bro,but this ain't happening. But for lower taxes - EU exists,15% VAT is more than normal for any country - NOT 20%. Say you wanna get something worth ~ 1000€,this 20% TAX adds 200€ to the price. This in some cases can mess up your calculations,because most products are firstly advertised in $ for the US market,and if you are planing to get a new device,let's say a phone for example,you see that it's price tag is 1000$,and you go like "Ok this is around 850€ - I can afford it" - NOPE the price tag actually ends up around 1100€ for some reason and your calculations - completely messed up. This has happened here with the launch of the iPhone X,that's why i gave this example.But I think you get my point - gl
Well, it's hard to argue against lower taxes. Because there are people who are much closer to those aformentioned 200 iq than any here on this forum who you had to argue with on the topic. Unless you want to argue from socialistic viewpoint. About crimes? IMO other than acts deserving ultimate punishment. (which I support ... in very specificaly interpreted way) ... justice system should be tuned towards rehabiliation. Because punishment just surpress the cause. Really harsh punishment can be detriment to will to do the act ever again. But most of the times there is recidive natural to most criminals. There is from socio psychical stand point something wrong with the processing in the brain or with the way how lymbic system and our cortex comunicate and that, on biological level, in a criminal. It's similiar to the way how Anxiety disorder, OCD and Panic disorder patients have wrong wiring and balancing in their brain. But it's treatable with heavy dose of cognitive behavioral therapy. Which is highly effective. Rehabilitation should be more like psychiatric treatment. And you don't need years of the thing. Also you can search for some research papers on the biology of punishment and the way how it makes thing worse in general for the specimen and his society. There's a bunch of the research on the matter in many species. Have fun.
lower taxes: just give em the good ole trickle down economis bullshit story about how rich ppl create work and its good for the economy to deregulate and lower taxes. keep it simple and make sure you say so many bullshit things that your opponent cant even respond to 5% of them properly.
less punishment for crimes: rehabilitation is the main issue, revenge is not. its about keeping ppl in a controlled environment so they cant hurt more innocent ppl until they are seemingly able to go back to society.
longer punishments increase recidivism. jail is crime college.
say refugees are bad 200iq, ez win
I strongly disagree with you in these subjects therefore I can't help you.
So you have a point of view but don't have any arguments to support it? Average leftist I guess.
Just say that it benefits the poor
There is college in swedistan?
Use Brazil as your point.
Higher taxes, benefits corruption, buying some rich companys to benefit then with lower increases on public banks, and 0 of public service, whatever in health or education.
Never defending higher taxes, this just destroy the thinks, i hope u use Gerard Depardieu case, imigrate out of France for high taxes on Francois Holande Socialist governance taxing 75% the riches.
Harder punishment will often lead to more crime and violence.
Lower taxes is hard, because its the only right way, but just say something about "Society will be more equal" - "Rich people don't need that much money" or smth.
1. Death penalty for rape, murder and pedophilia.
2. Lower taxes because less inmates
3. Legalize weed and put some low tax on it
-not lowering taxes
Make a constitution declaring yourself an independent state also saying that taxes should be lowered and guns are allowed now. Thank you for your time
well you should focus that high taxes on corps allow lower class to afford health care,books for their children etc.
lowering taxes = increases inequality
increased punishment = proven to be highly ineffective, should focus on rehabilitating people and helping them reintegrate back to society.
Leftist policies irl.
People become spoilt, lazy, shameless and dependent on wealth redistribution. Cry all the time about their so-called "entitlements" instead of getting off their fat asses and earning things themselves.
No one gets the punishment they justify. Social standards of morality get undermined and sidelined in favour of whatever is expedient for the state. Unjustly favours criminals over victims. Rehabilitative justice is completely cucked.
FTFY i hope you jump out in the middle of ur presentation and torpedo ur own side.
Extra points if you add the word "Swedistan" and get expelled from your leftist education institution for intolerance.
(I’m aware I am posting after the debate has already ended)
It’s all relative, what am I working with? What are the tax rates now? What is being taxed? What are the punishments for crime? For which crimes are these punishments given?