Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Astralis worst player had
Faroe Islands Ez4Olof 
Xyp9x had worst rating with 1.11(big events Imagine how good is this team I dont think anyone could beat them
2018-10-14 11:09
In history of cs go they are most dominant team for sure
2018-10-14 11:09
#2
 | 
Netherlands xEKOy 
lolol, you sick in the head ? replying to your own thread :/ doctor please !!
2018-10-14 11:10
chrisj dont be mad
2018-10-14 11:11
#164
 | 
Canada Timings 
Ez4North is right but has mental isues for real :D
2018-10-15 15:47
#5
s1mple | 
Colombia el1teman 
who can beat astralis atm lmao, stop being ignorant about astralis being lost dominant team
2018-10-14 11:11
#26
 | 
Paraguay HighAIching 
he said in history not atm...
2018-10-14 11:24
in history still most dominant team, no one even close to dominance which astralis has showed to other teams
2018-10-14 11:26
Astralis: > all the teams at their worst point of the year, main teams that won against Astralis - FaZe and SK/MIBR have problems fnatic: > all teams doing very good, many teams rising
2018-10-14 13:03
no one was disciplined as astralis, no one used utility as astralis, no one performed like all astralis players and no one used strats effectively as astralis. No teams were close to astralis
2018-10-14 13:07
So teamwork means you are the best.. Right.. lmao.
2018-10-14 13:17
yes but no other teams came close to perfected CS, fnatic based on individual skill and 0 fkness, nip cuz no one was good back then
2018-10-14 13:19
Fnatic 3 majors /closed
2018-10-14 13:27
#113
 | 
Denmark MeToxi 
Astralis 3 majors in 4 months
2018-10-15 08:10
There was only one major this year. What a retard. /close
2018-10-15 11:04
#135
 | 
Denmark MeToxi 
What the fuck you smoking?
2018-10-15 13:09
hltv.org/player/9032/Magisk how many majors you can see in magisks profile? 3 in 4 months... You should drop smoking instead. (1x major) Cya retard
2018-10-15 13:19
Haha u rekted him ez
2018-10-15 13:22
#141
 | 
Denmark MeToxi 
If you think he rekted me then you're a hypocrite right alongside him. #140
2018-10-15 14:21
#140
 | 
Denmark MeToxi 
hltv.org/player/885/olofmeister How many majors you can see in olofmeisters profile? Maybe you should quit smoking fucking hypocrite. (2x major winner) And learn to read. You were talking core so ofc i'd be talking core aswell. Astralis will win their 3rd major in 4 months. You understand now?
2018-10-15 14:20
hltv.org/player/3849/JW You are fuckin braindead. No reason to talk with you. Astralis have 2 majors and you talking about future now...
2018-10-15 14:27
#147
 | 
Denmark MeToxi 
Oh.. You're a newfag, thats why you're so braindead. Let me educate you a bit. hltv.org/player/7592/device hltv.org/player/7398/dupreeh hltv.org/player/4954/Xyp9x This is the core lineup for astralis which means that we'll count the majors they've won together. That is 2 majors as you see on those pages. As for fnatic you'd see these players: hltv.org/player/3849/JW hltv.org/player/3055/flusha hltv.org/player/41/pronax The difference here is that fnatic no longer have their 3man major winners core and therefor won't be able to expand on their 3 majors unless they aquire pronax whereas astralis still have their 3man core and therefor have a possibility to win their 3rd major early next year, which i think they will.
2018-10-15 14:32
Still fnatic was more dominant
2018-10-14 13:32
fnatic was more dominant as much as macedonia is a real country
2018-10-14 14:34
0 / 8
2018-10-14 15:10
#115
 | 
Brazil [Advan] 
lul
2018-10-15 08:28
ahahahahahah
2018-10-15 09:17
*1
2018-10-15 10:09
+1
2018-10-14 19:26
well i kinda think you're both right. if we talk which team is the best we can talk about astralis compared at fnatic back then but in term of dominance fnatic were better, dominance isn't based on how much good teams you can beat for a determinated time, but how much your team wins for that determinated time. fnatic were destroying everyone, doesn't matter the skill.
2018-10-14 19:21
#114
 | 
Denmark MeToxi 
If its all time then its more based on consistency. Astralis core have been a top10 team since they started playing together. Most of that time they've even been a top 5 team. And maybe altogether they've been nr. 1 for 1 year. Fnatic has fallen of the last couple of years and if astralis haven't overtaken them yet then they definitely will before the end of the year. (If they keep up their level)
2018-10-15 08:25
fnatic`? nip? sk?
2018-10-15 14:41
Yeah
2018-10-14 11:11
NiP were without a single doubt the most dominant team in the history of CS:GO. But Astralis streak is both more relevant and more impressive since the level of competition is on a completely other level now.
2018-10-14 11:31
When nip dominated the scene smithzz dosia xizt friberg was top 20 player and look at this players are they are bottom atm Nip dominated silver scene
2018-10-14 11:35
It's still part of history though.
2018-10-14 12:26
You clearly didn't read the rest of my comment
2018-10-14 12:39
Stopped reading at most dominant team in cs go
2018-10-14 19:12
Explains your stupid response
2018-10-15 09:09
#84
 | 
Finland Tusku 
oh so i guess everyone was trash in 1.6 bcus neo was the best player 4Head
2018-10-14 13:30
1.6=/cs go
2018-10-14 19:11
#53
gabs | 
Andorra DiaRhea 
NIP were dominating when very few played CSGO
2018-10-14 12:03
Did you even read my comment?
2018-10-14 12:38
#73
gabs | 
Andorra DiaRhea 
Stopped reading at NiP
2018-10-14 12:54
+1 +1 +1 +1
2018-10-14 20:42
Nice newfag,have you ever heard of 87-0?
2018-10-14 12:04
#69
 | 
Denmark Xipingu 
#34. People were also shit back then
2018-10-14 12:45
Doesnt change the fact they were the most dominant team ever,nobody ever came close to an 87-0
2018-10-14 12:56
#87
 | 
Denmark Xipingu 
It’s just pretty hollow in comparison regardless of scoreline, when you look at competition.
2018-10-14 14:30
Domitant is not about quality but quantity
2018-10-14 20:22
#110
 | 
Denmark Xipingu 
Yeah but it's not impressive. I can also train a game for 1000 hrs, have a 100 players come in with 0, destroy them, and get a 87-0 score. While dominant, it's not impressive.
2018-10-14 22:26
Still there is no team even close to a 87-0
2018-10-15 02:27
#112
 | 
Denmark Xipingu 
Do you even read what I write?
2018-10-15 08:08
#120
 | 
Czech Republic Prokcla 
Of course he doesnt, brazilian monkey
2018-10-15 09:15
#129
 | 
Denmark Xipingu 
+1
2018-10-15 10:07
do you even read what he typed? Dude your logic is ass, you have excuses against true facts. Nobody even close to NIP, sorry mad astralis boi
2018-10-15 09:17
#126
coldzera | 
Brazil ezSK 
+1
2018-10-15 09:31
#128
 | 
Denmark Xipingu 
Dude, it’s not that impressive. Everyone can 87-0 against people who haven’t trained shit in a new game. NiP wouldn’t even have half that score if people had invested as much time as they did. A good example is that two of my friends took 80-85 tries to beat me in a match even if it was 1v2, because they were new to CS:GO at the time. It’s the most dominant period, but my point is that it isn't that impressive. I am not impressed either by people destroying everyone in a board game, when they spent 100 hours fine tuning and reading every rule upside down. That would make them favourites to win anyways. Astralis obviously isn’t going to 87-0, no team can do so in this competitive era. But they ARE playing the best brand of CS teamwise. NiP is a legendary team, but stop sounding like everyone knew how to play GO, because that isn’t true.
2018-10-15 10:07
You're getting trolled by low quality bait.
2018-10-15 15:16
#156
 | 
Denmark Xipingu 
Not surprised, but that one was kinda close to the body if you understand. This site in general man... xD
2018-10-15 15:17
It's the same old shit and been like this for almost a decade in my experience, the early years was better, but not by a large margin. Regarding your NiP or Astralis comment, both has their merits. While their 87-0 run was a much less competitive era, it's still a very impressive not to falter once in such a long period. I completely agree that Astralis current run is more impressive. The 20-0 (or whatever it is at) on Nuke is more impressive.
2018-10-15 15:26
#116
 | 
Denmark MeToxi 
I'd say that astralis came close considering the competition difference. They got smth like 45 - 5 on lan i think, starting at marseille.
2018-10-15 08:34
Fnatic*
2018-10-14 12:46
fnatic 2k15 <3
2018-10-14 19:26
Fnatic 2k15 had pronax who cant frag but in astralis everyone can frag atm
2018-10-14 21:14
Ez4North ??????
2018-10-14 11:11
I am admitting greatness
2018-10-14 11:12
#25
 | 
Bulgaria mchetvorkata 
youre such a fanboy cunt
2018-10-14 11:22
#8
 | 
Spain elskio 
If they win IEM chicago, EPL and ECS finals then yes
2018-10-14 11:13
iem kawotice too
2018-10-14 11:40
wtf u want 2 straight years with awemost no trophies lost to prove?
2018-10-14 13:20
Yes like fnatic did /close
2018-10-14 13:28
? fnatic wasn't even near this dominant. fnatic often lost to even TSM, who was considered fnatic kryptonite. They lost to EnvyUs, G2, Luminosity etc. as well.
2018-10-14 14:39
And Astralis's kryptonite is North and they lost to Na'Vi fairly recently. It's just a recency bias.
2018-10-14 19:27
TSM was a top4 team then, North isn't even near. They lost to navi once and spanked them 5 times.
2018-10-14 20:18
#119
 | 
Denmark MeToxi 
Its not comparable. Last time North and Astralis played (Granted, it was online) astralis won 16 - 4 and 16 - 3. Stockholm was a fluke where North overperformed and everyone else underperformed. When TSM was fnatics kryptonite, it was for a longer period. Not just one event.
2018-10-15 09:15
you clearlyy didnt watch fnatic era
2018-10-14 19:26
the most dominant? they won 6 out of 12 big events that they attended this year which is 50% and they werent able to win more than 2 big events in a row...just saying
2018-10-14 11:13
Dont count event until march They had semis every event after marseille They just lost semis in cologne which zeus dropped 30 frags in decider map after 2015 They lost sydney with 2 margin in every map I mean they had most dominant major win Just saying
2018-10-14 11:18
"which zeus dropped 30 frags in decider map after 2015" irrelevant "They lost sydney with 2 margin in every map" irrelevant they lost and thats the only thing that actually matter. again, they werent able to win more than 2 big events in a row
2018-10-14 11:19
their era is still going
2018-10-14 11:21
#23
2018-10-14 11:22
#123
 | 
Denmark MeToxi 
If you think losing 16 - 0 is the same as losing 19 - 17 then you're delusional. The outcome may be the same but its not the same at all.
2018-10-15 09:21
If we are talking about achievements and standings then it is completely irrelevant if team, xyz lost 16:14 or 16:0. The fact is that team A was first and team B second. Your 2nd place isn't more valuable or important only bcs it was close game. As simple as that
2018-10-15 10:28
#134
 | 
Denmark MeToxi 
So a team losing 16 - 0 and a team who lose 19 - 17 against the same opponent would go 15 - 15 against each other if they'd play? It does matter since it shows how far away this team was from winning against that team and how much better a team actually is. And we need to know that to determine overall achievements. A close win vs a dominant win. A clear winner vs a close winner. Which is better?
2018-10-15 13:09
I'm talking only about tournament standings and in this concrete case it doesn't matter bcs it's still 2nd place. I understand your point and I even agree with it in your point of view but that's not what I am talking about
2018-10-15 13:12
#143
 | 
Denmark MeToxi 
If you disregard that fact then its not a very precise picture you get. Thats why i pointed it out. A good example of this is IEM sydney final. You could look at the 3-0 map result and think "Dayum, faze won dominantly", or you could look at the individual map scorelines and think "This was a very close and exciting match. A few clutches going to the other side and this would've looked different"
2018-10-15 14:25
Yea sure, like I ready said, I agree with you BUT I'm talking about ranking which is based on achievements and achievements only... And not on head to head match ups etc
2018-10-15 14:39
#150
 | 
Denmark MeToxi 
but rankings IS based on head to head matchups. hltv.org/ranking/teams/2018/october/8/de.. As you can see there is a subranking called "Form" which covers 20% of their overall ranking. Are you talking about of all time ranking though? If so then the match scoreline still matters since it shows how dominantly a teams wins a tournament which shows how much the tournament should matter in their legacy. I do realize that you agree with me, i just dont think you see the relevance.
2018-10-15 14:45
Imo if I'm talking about the best or the most dominant team, I don't care about score... But about how many events team attended, how many events did they win and their longest streak. For example 10 tournaments streak with close matches is surely better than 6 tournaments with 16:2 finals. History remembers winners, that's all what I am saying
2018-10-15 15:03
#157
 | 
Denmark MeToxi 
That's where we differ in opinions. I fx remember that at Marseille only one team won a map against astralis, and they won 16-14. I also remember that the closest map besides that one were 16-11 but most were around 16-7 or so. A 16-2 score would show that one team is much better than the other (except for dd2 ofc) and a 16-14 would show that the teams is very closely matched. But that is ofc just my opinion.
2018-10-15 15:19
Fair enough. Have a nice day ;)
2018-10-15 15:21
#160
 | 
Denmark MeToxi 
Yeah, you too ;)
2018-10-15 15:21
#21
 | 
Spain elskio 
IEM Sydney ESL Cologne DH Master Stockholm they only lost 3 events, and their era started at DH Marseille
2018-10-14 11:20
so if we are talking only about 3 events, how can someone claim that they are the most dominant team in whole freaking history...:D?
2018-10-14 11:22
#29
 | 
Spain elskio 
They won 6 out of 9 big events and with Major, only fnatic can compare with it, name other one who can do that :)
2018-10-14 11:25
why do you count only some events and not all of them with this lineup? again, they won only 50% of big events that they attended and not more than 2 in a row. fnatic and nip are without a doubt above astralis for now
2018-10-14 11:27
By ur logic fnatic wasnt dominant in 2014 with same roster and after cologne 2015 with same rostet And nip with fifflaren lost 2 major finals and dominated irrelevant scene
2018-10-14 11:33
fnatic still won 6 tournaments in a row with dennis, 4 of them being big one...more dominant team
2018-10-14 11:40
Astralis era still going
2018-10-14 19:12
that doesnt change literally anything. they still arent the most dominant team in history...
2018-10-14 19:17
#41
 | 
Spain elskio 
Faceit and Blast EPL S7 and ECS S5 hltv.org/ranking/teams/2018/october/8/de.. we talk about dominant team, they weren't good enough when Magisk just join, Is FNATIC dominating when they just formed? nip LUL
2018-10-14 11:36
fnatic still won 6 tournaments in a row, 4 of them being big one...more dominant team and yes, nip was the most dominant team in history if you like it or not
2018-10-14 11:40
#47
 | 
Spain elskio 
fnatic won 6 tournament in 3 months, ofc they were dominating in that time, but only 3 months. Astralis is about more then half of year, 6 out of 9 and still on going, just like saying that North is most dominant team in DH Stockholm, ofc noone can beat them in that event they are best but that was only one event :)
2018-10-14 11:48
its imo still way too much to call them the most dominant team of all time for now...they are surely on good way tho
2018-10-14 11:54
#48
 | 
Indonesia linekerrr 
You should also note that Fnatic only won 6/11 of the events they attended.
2018-10-14 11:50
it would be still better in % than astralis so dont see your point...
2018-10-14 11:55
#51
 | 
Indonesia linekerrr 
The point is you made them sound like they won 6/6 and that they've never lost an event. Be objective and don't be hypocritical. You commented that #29 only counted some events when in fact you did so as well. That's hypocrisy.
2018-10-14 11:57
im objective...fnatic was still more dominant with longer streak which is FACT nomatter how do you look at it.
2018-10-14 12:01
#56
 | 
Indonesia linekerrr 
Questionable since you weren't holding both team to the same metric. But, oh well, whatever you say. Fact of the matter is you're hypocritical, doesn't matter whether you're right or wrong. Btw i agree that fnatic is more dominant.
2018-10-14 12:05
it isnt questionable if you look at results...
2018-10-14 12:11
#58
 | 
Indonesia linekerrr 
If it wasn't clear before, I meant that your objectivity was questionable...........................................................................
2018-10-14 12:12
english ??????????????
2018-10-14 11:13
Short is connector btw
2018-10-14 11:18
yes it is brother
2018-10-14 11:25
Xyp9x isn't the worst player in Astralis. He is their second most important player after glaive.
2018-10-14 11:15
EZ4ENCE
2018-10-14 11:17
can you read bruh?
2018-10-14 12:14
trade xyp9x on valde
2018-10-14 11:16
like trading s1mple with dead fox
2018-10-14 11:17
no
2018-10-14 11:18
yes /closed
2018-10-14 11:18
#62
 | 
Belgium 69Savage 
/opened +1 /closed
2018-10-14 12:30
#63
 | 
Russia NOD777 
With an actual dead fox xD
2018-10-14 12:30
rofl so delusional...
2018-10-14 11:25
#72
 | 
Denmark Xipingu 
Valde is not even that good, hold your horses.
2018-10-14 12:48
Trade Xyp9x with valde?????? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahshshahshahhahaahahahhaahashhahavaha
2018-10-15 15:21
#20
SpawN | 
Mexico <3 Zetas 
G2 could beat astralis
2018-10-14 11:20
g2 would be glad for 5 rounds in bo5 lol
2018-10-14 11:25
lmao
2018-10-14 11:30
kennys and shox 50 bomb every map for a 26-24 OT win lol
2018-10-14 11:32
kenny and shox would drop 50 bomb together over 5 maps
2018-10-14 11:32
we all know god smithzzz is the answer. ez 4 smithzzz 140.5 adr +65 k/d
2018-10-14 11:34
Magisk is worst +Kjaerbye -Magisk
2018-10-14 11:36
#64
 | 
Russia NOD777 
NT snakebye
2018-10-14 12:31
#124
 | 
African Union Tobias1906 
-1 Magisk>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shakebye
2018-10-15 09:21
This is the worst bait ever, 00000000000000000/8888888888888
2018-10-15 13:12
Xyp9x isn't the worst player in Astralis he is the best support/clutcher player atm. and one of the best player in the world (top7)
2018-10-14 11:36
#55
 | 
United Kingdom Hamshanks 
he clearly means statistically
2018-10-14 12:05
astralos good but north shit
2018-10-14 11:39
#60
 | 
Portugal raaVz 
fnatic with dennis won 6 events in a row...
2018-10-14 12:17
best team atm YES best dominance in the history NO (but they will do that, if they play like this in the future) imo
2018-10-14 12:36
yeah we also said "who could beat them" about faze when their worst player went like 1.30. Just wait for a team to make roster changes, Astralis won't be top 1 by the end of the year.
2018-10-14 12:40
#71
 | 
Europe Hempxz 
xyp9x
2018-10-14 12:48
#75
 | 
Turkey evonic 
fnatic
2018-10-14 12:59
+1
2018-10-14 13:23
#86
 | 
Serbia toENDallWARS 
non of them are wrose they all need eachother otherwise it would not work they all play a key role in this killing machine of dominance.. even device on his passive awping style thats the perfect way to play in Astrails thats what they need the right balance and it works to perfecto imadgine a jw in Astralis pushing and dieying alot? it would not work.. its just perfect for Astralis atm
2018-10-14 13:33
yep, they found harmony within team wonder how long it gonna last
2018-10-14 19:22
#103
 | 
Serbia toENDallWARS 
4-6 more months of dominance and then slowing down abit in the middle of 2019 i think.. but with this lineup they will always be a top 5 team competing at a high level getting to finals, winning trophies and going far.. i cant see them dropping of and changing their team for a good 2 years there is no need.
2018-10-14 19:27
ok
2018-10-14 14:41
greatest team of all time probably
2018-10-14 15:13
#107
 | 
Hong Kong nekami 
1) Does a Support need a 1.4 rating, same as Awper to be pro? 2) Do you know what a Support role do in a team? 3) Do you know why CSGO tournament is played in 5 men but not 1? 4) Do you know who is the best clutchmeister in CSGO, admitted by pros? 5) Do you know who hold the most 1vN record in single event? 6) Do you know I am baited by a North fanboy and not suprised?
2018-10-14 20:33
#117
 | 
Kuwait dab_and_bait 
0/8
2018-10-15 08:54
#125
 | 
Denmark MeToxi 
Its unbelievable how many see this as an insult towards xyp9x. It clearly isn't. He never disputed the fact that xyp9x is a great support and clutch player, he's just bad at expressing his point, i guess.
2018-10-15 09:27
#127
Snax | 
India editz10 
Rating lul astra have 5 power team work and brain
2018-10-15 09:33
#132
 | 
Sweden swediztann3 
I love xypex great player. But does ppl even watch csgo anymore i watched some event highlifhts from 2014-2015 looked so fun and casters were hyped now days its booring as fuck
2018-10-15 10:26
People do. Just because you don't doesn't mean people as well don't watch.
2018-10-15 15:46
#165
 | 
Sweden swediztann3 
25k views was it last time i watched so i dont knowws
2018-10-15 16:02
The problem is they don't attend enough tournaments and also don't win enough to be really dominant. You can't just take every 2nd tourny off if you want dominance. Sure for top1 it is enough but domination like nip or fnatic is a bit more. Also the 4 clear top teams for a long time now, astralis, navi, sk and faze, of which 2 are having changes atm, which makes it easier for astralis
2018-10-15 14:21
yes if u beat them it is a fluke
2018-10-15 14:26
fnatic more dominant
2018-10-15 14:27
#152
 | 
North America silly[] 
only hard dominant because no other team is close to their skill level faze have been fucked since boston + olof being off and on for the past 8 months. sk/mibr had some retarded roster changes. c9 same as sk/mibr mouz currently dealing with their waste of 300k g2 are being g2 only two teams i see beating ast in their current form are liquid and maybe navi.
2018-10-15 15:07
There is a big difference between being the most dominant team and being the best team of all time. Astralis are for sure the best team of all time in terms of skill, but they are not the most dominant in terms of consistently destroying every team for a long period of time.
2018-10-15 15:10
it was way easier to be more dominant earlier in cs:go, players weren't as skilled mechanic wise, tactics weren't as polished etc. that's why 2-10 spots are pretty much interchangeable it's because the gap is really not that big between them all.
2018-10-15 15:17
#161
 | 
Poland Ktav 
Close
2018-10-15 15:22
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.