Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Totalitarianism causes school shooting. US is fundamentally totalitarian state as well as Russia.
2018-10-17 19:00
XD
2018-10-17 19:01
You think you as a citizen of US can change anything by voting in a election ?
2018-10-17 19:04
what for you is the thing that needs to change in USA
2018-10-17 19:08
Get rid of the two-party political system.
2018-10-17 19:10
#30
Kane | 
Other UknowY 
And then?
2018-10-17 19:51
Anyways it does not work.
2018-10-17 19:52
#38
 | 
United States Drude57 
why would we ever get rid of it
2018-10-17 21:12
#40
SS | 
Japan Kryptonic_ 
Yes they can make changes
2018-10-17 21:20
why
2018-10-17 19:02
Because in Poland you can become a member of the Falanga and went to Donbas to kill Ukrainians. That is why no school shooting in Poland.
2018-10-17 19:09
#24
 | 
Europe deVulse 
why are u even spreading such bs about a country that lets you clean their toilets for 1/10 of normal salary but its still enough to make you a millionaire in ur shithole LUL?
2018-10-17 19:42
The members of Falanga was fighting in Donbas against Ukraine. Poland must be thankful that Ukrainians work here.
2018-10-17 19:48
#6
 | 
United States TriHardSeven 
Russian talking axaxaxaxaaxaxaxaxa
2018-10-17 19:10
nt a Russian fake flagger.
2018-10-17 19:11
#11
 | 
United States TriHardSeven 
2018-10-17 19:11
nt a Russian fake flagger.
2018-10-17 19:12
#14
 | 
United States TriHardSeven 
REPORTED FOR 0/8
2018-10-17 19:13
nt a Russian fake flagger.
2018-10-17 19:16
#19
 | 
United States TriHardSeven 
0/8
2018-10-17 19:17
0/8
2018-10-17 19:10
It is not a bait.
2018-10-17 19:11
0 / 8
2018-10-17 19:12
It is not a bait.
2018-10-17 19:15
why vladik, why
2018-10-17 19:14
I think because of the Russian totalitarianism.
2018-10-17 19:15
> relating to a system of government that is centralized and dictatorial and requires complete subservience to the state. > united states pick one
2018-10-17 19:18
Why the US afraid of a competitive political scene ?
2018-10-17 19:26
what do you mean "the us"? If you're talking about the people of the United States, there is nothing stopping them from voting for a third party if that party / candidate is popular enough.
2018-10-17 19:28
I mean that the current political system no more represents electoral views.
2018-10-17 19:51
in what way?
2018-10-17 20:50
Like socialists vote for the Democratic Party but this party is not sotialiastic at all. Or people who want less government vote for the Republican Party but this party also far from libertarian ideas.
2018-10-17 21:01
socialists like ocasio cortez, nancy pelosi, bernie sanders? They are all democrats. they and more leading democrats want to outlaw private insurance and privatize the healthcare industry. How is that "not socialistic at all"? The democratic party in general is moving further left and it is back firing on them. Even then, there are exceptions to the republicans who want small government (there are too many who do not, unfortunately, and I agree with you there). Like Rand Paul, a constitutional ACTUAL conservative, is a republican. We need more like Rand to make our country great again.
2018-10-17 21:11
0/8
2018-10-17 19:38
It is not a bait.
2018-10-17 19:50
#25
 | 
Europe deVulse 
"Communism is perfect" Always knew only a bunch of deluded retards believe in that but now its just a huge LUL
2018-10-17 19:43
Communism is pure evil.
2018-10-17 19:50
#33
 | 
Faroe Islands I_Oof_myself 
0/8 teens who shoot up schools don't give a fuck about politics.
2018-10-17 20:52
Everything around you is some kind of politic.
2018-10-17 21:02
#36
 | 
Denmark Xipingu 
First of all, hi Vladik. Second, the US’ problems can be shortened down to two issues. Incompetent politicians with no idea how to do anything properly, and the second amendment which everyone holds onto, not giving two fucks about anyone’s innocent lives being ended by sick idiots. If anyone is about to say debt; politics. In fact, you are right. The politicians are just worthless and uneducated
2018-10-17 21:08
you speak of being uneducated, but the proposed alternatives to the second amendment are completely meaningless and are written by those who know absolutely nothing about firearms. They can't even tell you the difference between a semi automatic or a fully automatic, nor can they define the so-called "assault rifle" as anything other than black and intimidating. Restricting the law abiding citizen's ability to get a firearm does not influence the criminal's ability to do the same on the black market. if the left really wanted to stop school shootings, they would be okay with allowing eligible professors to carry their firearms or armed personnel in schools to shoot the psychopath who wants to murder children. instead they propose these meaningless policies that won't do shit in disguise of the simple agenda of getting guns out of the hands of the american people.
2018-10-17 21:17
#41
 | 
Denmark Xipingu 
See, what you Americans and what not (multiple nationalities I know) seem to won’t recognize, is the fact that this isn’t imposed by other countries - as in Denmark - and we do not face the same problems as you. Even European shitholes have less homicides, school shootings, and overall less problems related to those problems that will come with access to firearms for all. Numbers do not lie, is what I am saying. Idk what the numbers look like exactly right now, but it’s only a few years ago that US homicide rates were 5-10x if not bigger than most other countries in the world, aside from the really corrupt ones that obviously is inflated as a result. The second amendment cannot be pulled back, much less stopped - but there is no denying that it shouldn’t ever have existed. Sadly a lot of innocents are dying because of it. But alas with it being as far out of control as it is - the solution will only be more guns to those that work at those places indeed. It’s just terrible to watch this political funeral of decisions that may be best related to sloppyness still haunt today.
2018-10-17 21:30
Do you really think it is reasonable to compare the homicides statistics of a country with 325 million people with countries ("euro shitholes") which only have a few million people living inside of it? Not only is that unreasonable, it is simply not true. The united states is immensely safer than it was 20, even 10 years ago, the only reason that people think otherwise is because the media explodes these tragic stories as if they occur every day. You are right when you say that it does not happen in other countries. this is because our country has developed since its inception with a strong firearm and liberty culture which has led to where we are today. that's really what it is, a cultural difference between our countries and the value that we place upon our security and that of our family and home. for example, i view the ability to own a firearm as an equalizer between the potentially armed criminal trying to break into my home and harm my family and loot my possessions. Or the ability to protect my family and my community from a tyrannical government in the case that that would ever happen (you must understand that our country was born as a result of the rebellion against the strongest empire on the face of the earth). "The second amendment cannot be pulled back, much less stopped - but there is no denying that it shouldn’t ever have existed. Sadly a lot of innocents are dying because of it. " the situation currently is not easy, you cannot take firearms away from law abiding citizens (of which the VAST majority of firearm owners are) and there are so many firearms in the united states already that it would be difficult to get them off the black market as well. It is essential that you recognize that for every person being killed tragically as a result of a firearm homicide, there may have been eighteen thousand homicides but there were somewhere from 500 thousand to THREE MILLION uses of a firearm which have actually SAVED lives. The discrepancy between 500,000 ( a minimum) and 3 million is because it is possible to simply brandish a firearm and save someone's life in the process of a crime. This means that there is a ratio of somewhere between 27:1 and 166:1 lives saved to lives taken with firearms in our country. Based on that I could not argue that the second amendment has done more harm than good. If anything, it is the exact opposite. Yet we have leftist politicians, who know nothing about firearms to begin with, want to enact these policies which would not actually have stopped ANY of the school shooters in the last twenty years, but would simply infringe upon the right of the majority (law abiding firearm owners) to obey the law while also protecting their livelihood. wow that is a lot more than i wanted to write.
2018-10-17 21:56
What are u talking about?
2018-10-17 21:31
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.