I know that he put I think VP above SK but he stated that SK are the best team in the world for his money, they just lacked achievements compared to VP + wins against VP. So even if you think they are the best team in the world they dont necessary have to be ranked as number 1. And he put Faze once above SK when SK were clearly better but thats logical since it was when SK brought in boltz so majority of tournaments was with felps = he couldnt really consider those tournaments as highly as tournaments with boltz. So anything that could seem off actually is correct. The best team in the world doesnt have to be ranked number 1, I know it sounds weird but let me explain. A new lineup can form, they can lack achievements compared to other team or they skip a tournament or two and someone can win it and take the 1st place. It doesnt necessary have to show the best team in the world, just team which suits the most for n1 in context of some recent tournaments played and that doesnt have to be the best team in the world, just a team with honeymoon period or that best team didnt attend.