Thread has been deleted
Last comment
I5 9600k @5.1GHz bad fps in csgo
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Hello guys, i recently bought a i5 9600k that i have overclocked to 5.1GHz. I needed a better cpu for my 240HZ monitor but on the benchmarking map on workshop im only getting around 250-270 fps. Meanwhile i see people on youtube almost getting double as much fps.... Do you have any ideas what it could be? My specs right now are I5-9600k ROG STRIX Z390-F Corsair 750W gold psu 16GB HyperX ram 2400MHz Asus strix 1060 6GB Fractal design S36 360mm rad 860 EVO 500GB SSD That im running csgo on Monitors: Asus XG258Q and BenQ xl2411t
2018-12-03 01:04
#1
Germany pmb  
csgo is fucking trash engine-wise. the benchmark map is also pretty consuming, im getting ~220fps with 2700x. I dont think we can expect to see much bigger gains, this game needs a rewrite on so many levels edit: there was the possibility to delete the graphics document which lead to around 50fps gains in the bench map, I think this doesnt work anymore though. You should be able to break 300fps though
2018-12-03 01:10
#2
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Yup, they really need to do something with the engine. If they had reworked the whole game from the bottom to the top so it would be up to standard with 2018/2019 games i bet we could get way better fps and generally have a better experience with the game
2018-12-03 01:10
apology for poor english when were you when no source2? i was sat home drinking brain fluid when gaben ring ‘source2 is kill’ ‘no’
2018-12-03 01:14
#41
 | 
Brazil jmarcelo 
what? i get it, u dont speak english well, but your sentence made no sense...
2018-12-03 03:28
are u dumb
2018-12-03 10:28
#192
 | 
Brazil jmarcelo 
Maybe
2018-12-03 19:13
#220
gla1ve | 
Denmark topres 
8/8
2018-12-09 11:19
Well, they could start off by creating a game that is not a console port for PC gamers.. That'd help heaps.
2018-12-03 08:37
#206
SPUNJ | 
Latvia XYPyra 
GTA 4 is baf example of porting to PC. I have more fps on GTA 5 than on GTA 4
2018-12-09 04:50
In the history of games, not a single game that has been a straight port from console has worked without issues on PC. Valve is and was ridiculous for shitting on their loyal PC gamers and going in console first. Major fuck-up which still distorts the game we know and play today.
2018-12-09 13:55
#78
 | 
Denmark kreutch 
with my 4-year-old i7 4790 and GTX 970 I get around 250 fps, cs:go is scamming you xd
2018-12-03 09:08
+1.
2018-12-03 17:16
#3
 | 
Russia .cyb3r 
did you check launch options? like -threads 6 check vsync stuff - it could be enabled\disabled check fps cap in cs go console
2018-12-03 01:11
#7
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
I use fps max 0 and these are my launch options -novid -tickrate 128 -threads 6 +cl_forcepreload 1 -snd_headphone_pan_exponent 2 -snd_front_headphone_position 45 -snd_rear_headphone_position 135 -nod3d9ex -dxlevel 90 -freq 240 -refresh 240 -scaleform
2018-12-03 01:16
holy fk so much shit. use only -novid -tickrate 128 and +exec autoexec if u have an autoexec
2018-12-03 01:22
+1
2018-12-03 09:19
he should also drop in -nojoy -high +cl_forcepreload 1 and wtf is with that old school -scaleform omegalul.
2018-12-03 16:35
nojoy was a one-time fix for a temporary bug causing fps issues that no longer works. you should not use -high cause it could probably give you even more issues. cl_forcepreload can be on your autoexec.
2018-12-05 20:52
try -high
2018-12-03 01:29
#28
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
What does -high exactly do?
2018-12-03 01:38
high cpu priority for csgo
2018-12-03 01:39
#31
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Oh okay, ill put that in there then
2018-12-03 01:42
Having a lot of launch options can make your game run worse. If you want to give it a shot, try having no launch options and see what happens. Just remember to type fps_max 0 when the game opens.
2018-12-03 08:42
if u have a good cpu, u shouldnt use that. try to add these to launch settings +mat_queue_mode 2 +cl_forcepreload 1 and these sound settings are weird, same of the dxlevel i have old i5 cpu with 4,3 overclock and use these settings +mat_queue_mode 2 +cl_forcepreload 1 +rate 786432 -novid -nojoy -freq 144 -tickrate 128 i get on some maps like nuke 200-360fps
2018-12-03 08:53
#167
 | 
Canada gaaagnon 
-high -threads launch options are worthless now, and are no longer being used by cs go. This could hinder your performance more than it helps. Remove that shit. EDIT: Unpark your cpu cores if you have not done so already. I know that did a ton of difference for me. Maybe your overclock isn't stable enough? Seeing as the 9600k with turbo goes to 4.6 ghz... .7 ghz more shouldn't really be hard to get stable with those generations of cpu so that is very unlikely but could be possible.
2018-12-03 16:32
There is no reason for -high to hinder performance in any way, u don't know what ur talking about. The overclock part is also bs, 7 ghz on even water cooling is basically impossible unless you are willing to burn your cpu with the voltage u'll be feeding it.
2018-12-03 16:38
#189
 | 
Canada gaaagnon 
Are you autistic? .7 ghz, because he's .7ghz over what he would get with turbo boost? Hello? Should I write 700 mhz for you to comprehend? -High doesn't work anymore, adding a launch option that the game doesn't know what to do with? yes that could potentially hinder performance.
2018-12-03 18:29
remove -threads 6 it makes your cpu work as i3 or something and its -tickrate 784 now i think
2018-12-03 03:24
.... Reply needs to have actual content
2018-12-03 07:02
#80
 | 
Netherlands @Deji 
Bro remove all that crap especially -threads put the rest in your autoexec
2018-12-03 09:13
#175
 | 
Denmark Dy_Arceus 
Take out scaleform
2018-12-03 16:42
#198
Pogba | 
France uria64 
thread >4 is useless
2018-12-09 02:57
I don't know what happened to CSGO over the years, but it seems like as time moves on, the framerate just goes down... For some whatever reason they felt the necessity to put in a blur effect during on of their updates too, visible when you press tab to reveal the scoreboard... It's purely aesthetic and drops 30 to 50fps when you look... :D I don't understand this kind of thing, but they fuck up a little bit of performance with every update, the worst one was the D2 revamp, which was so bad it needed actual fixing, because fixing other performance issues is quite unheard of in CS.
2018-12-03 01:13
they have to give sponsors some reason to push consumers to more and more expensive high end hardware. the maps get more and more detailed as well, which is understandable though since people eventually expect better visuals, so I am not even opposed to that. but I rememeber back in 1.6 when they updated de_aztec, which was a hugely popular map in 1.1 all the way to 1.5 and it got absolutely canned by fps drops and stuttering in the 1.6 update that came with Steam. Everyone promptly stopped playing it. Pre-Steam CS had absolutely flawless performance at 100 fps/Hz/update-/cmdrate on CRTs running on almost any mid-range PC at the time. they could do the same thing with CSGO right now, if they just implemented effective LOD and UI FX options for optimization.
2018-12-03 09:53
#5
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
But if you look at this video you would think i were able to atleast get around the same fps, but i dont... at 1:50 in the video im getting 130fps and this guy is getting 330fps+... HOW!? youtu.be/jrlLgbqqEpQ
2018-12-03 01:14
#76
 | 
Spain Kyuuta 
You have 1060, he has 1080
2018-12-03 09:04
#91
 | 
Denmark tsdrummer1 
+1
2018-12-03 09:39
He has 1060 too !??
2018-12-03 10:31
#219
 | 
Spain Kyuuta 
AHAHHAHAHA WTF
2018-12-09 11:18
Slow ram = lower min fps. Try 3200MHz cl 14.
2018-12-03 10:19
#8
Russia accn 
old bad engine can't handle modern hardware
2018-12-03 01:20
Enable one-core in settings, that might could be. pd: i think that hyperx 2400mhz ram is so slow for that settings idk
2018-12-03 01:25
#11
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Ram speed shouldn't matter at all
2018-12-03 01:28
No, it should. I've got i7 8700k and Coffee Lake depends so much on ram speed it's kinda funny actually. U WON'T get a decent performance with less than 2666 mhz. Just check ram benchmarks for Coffee Lake. Difference between 2133 mhz and 3200 mhz could be like 40-50 fps in some games. Basically for Coffee Lake 2666 mhz is minimum, 3000+ is the sweet spot.
2018-12-03 08:50
#89
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Wow i had no clue about this :O
2018-12-03 09:35
In a highly CPU limited scenario, RAM speed is actually fairly important, especially with overclocked high end CPUs that are able to use memory interfacing at the absolute limit. With a lower to mid range CPU this effect has much less of an impact, so your point wasn't completely unfounded.
2018-12-03 10:03
Yeah me too, which is why I bought 2133mhz 2x8 gb kit before they posted ram tests for coffee lake. Now I regret it af :D
2018-12-03 17:58
#207
SPUNJ | 
Latvia XYPyra 
Yea, my i5-2500 was dropping fps in CSGO and it felt real bad. I had single channel enabled - that caused problem, so I swithced to right ports and everything is good.
2018-12-09 04:58
It actually doesn't show the rest of the specs, so kinda pointless if u ask me
2018-12-03 17:57
Ram speeds matter a lot, I have few questions, wby would you pair such a good cpu with such mediocre gpu, and bad slow ram, this build is messed up all around. Bottleneck af. With this cpu you're obligated to get at least 1070ti, and 3200mhz cl 14 ram, in order to use your cpu power properly, especially with 240hz monitor. 2nd of all why would you need more fps, if it doest drop below 240, there is 0 difderence between 240 and 600 fps, no input lag or anything.
2018-12-03 09:41
Do you actually notice input lag at steady 120fps compared to 240fps? I used to play 100hz CRT back in the day and for sure 60fps to 100fps was a huge leap. But eventually I even got used to TFT 60hz@120fps. I remember it felt like a step backwards, but I can't imagine there being much of a difference between 120/144 and 240Hz nowadays. But then again, I have never tried anything beyond 100Hz CRT and my memory of that is fading as well, so may be it is time to try one.
2018-12-03 10:15
On 240hz monitor yes, but on 144hz, we did numerous amount of blind testings with fps capped at 150 and fps max 999, you couldn't feel a single difference, even after multiple hours. 240hz is a huge difference commjng from 144hz as well, can't imagine going back
2018-12-03 10:49
#12
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
how do i enable one-core in the settings? I wanna try
2018-12-03 01:28
prntscr.com/lpvem8 if you have it enabled, then disable it, that might be works idk bro
2018-12-03 01:31
#18
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
alright, i will try a new test right now
2018-12-03 01:32
ok, try it and tell me if that works
2018-12-03 01:33
#20
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Im sorry, that just made it worse
2018-12-03 01:34
mmm idk bro, that might be your pc has a virus on it or something
2018-12-03 01:34
#27
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Malwarebytes doesnt find any, plus im a good boi. I dont do the dirty dirty on pc i swear Kappa
2018-12-03 01:36
appaK I find your solution, just look the entire video (and you'r going to be sad ;() youtube.com/watch?v=VBIQ0mCeyPc
2018-12-03 01:43
#197
rain | 
Norway F1lur 
He has i5 9600k not i9
2018-12-09 02:55
#199
rain | 
Norway F1lur 
if that wasn't the point of the video im sorry xd
2018-12-09 02:58
there should be something wrong with your settings or whatever. I`m currently using a 8600k at 5.2 GHz and a Rtx 2070, launch options +exec autoexec -novid - tickrate 128 -freq 240, and thats all. Running the FPS benchmark from workshop, i assume you are using the same one, i get around 450fps average on the console when the benchmark is over. is your multicore rendering enabled in game video settings?
2018-12-03 01:28
#16
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Yes, i have multicore rendering enabled, should i disable it?
2018-12-03 01:30
No, let it stay enabled
2018-12-03 01:58
500fps ezpz
2018-12-03 01:29
using windows 10?
2018-12-03 01:34
#24
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Yeah, windows 10 pro actually
2018-12-03 01:35
well theres your problem
2018-12-03 01:36
#29
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Why?
2018-12-03 01:38
i have seen a lot of posts on this forum about ppl with windows 10 getting low fps
2018-12-03 01:54
win 10 build 1809 has improved my fps tbh... and i didnt disable many things like i usually do.. just used o&o shutup10 software, and then i disabled fullscreen optimizations in csgo.exe properties
2018-12-03 07:05
Just give it a try with Windows 7. You have no idea how many problems people have with Windows 10. Get a secondary boot device (doesn't necessarily need to be an ssd) and try with Windows 7. Otherwise try some old nVIDIA drivers and get the latest chipset drivers from Intel's website.
2018-12-03 09:20
i think you did reply to the wrong guy ... im ok with my win10 i5 4460 running at 200fps+
2018-12-03 09:56
Ohh yes I did. I am sorry for that. I'm also OK with Windows 10 regarding the performance aspect but I did have many problems in the past and I still don't like the fact that uploads data to Microsoft without my certification. Where's your privacy aspect? It seems that people forgot the importance of what's called "private".
2018-12-03 10:08
but win 7 or win 10 is the same thing... both are impossible to despy 100% ... only solution is linux. but there is no AC for faceit in linux for example so we need to make choices... Also im thinking about to start to go to lan events. and lan sensitivity will be all time on win10 OS... win7 to win10 sens is different even with raw input. (another thing is my pc came with win8.1 my usb 3.0 doesnt work in win7.. i manage to update drivers and didn't work correctly anyways
2018-12-03 10:11
On my motherboard USB 3.0 and 3.1 work in Windows 7 without problems. I've just installed the proprietary drivers from Gigabyte's website and it worked just fine. I've looked into OS requests and Windows 7 makes just a few in small sizes. Can't say the same for Windows 10 though. Yes Linux is my primary OS for doing everything else but gaming. youtube.com/watch?v=IWJUphbYnpg These are great news but I just hope that it will still improve. Also, I can see Microsoft trying to cut this down in order to maintain their market.
2018-12-03 10:36
Just try inatalling win7
2018-12-03 08:18
#55
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Alright
2018-12-03 08:30
Edit::actually dont do it, im retarded and now i realized that theres no support for 7th and higher gen cpus on w7 All u are left with is changing things in w10, such as turning off that xbox bs and other
2018-12-03 08:33
#59
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Oh right xd
2018-12-03 08:34
you can try install win10 LTSB Enterprise build
2018-12-03 08:41
Just give it a try with Windows 7. You have no idea how many problems people have with Windows 10. Get a secondary boot device (doesn't necessarily need to be an ssd) and try with Windows 7. Otherwise try some old nVIDIA drivers and get the latest chipset drivers from Intel's website.
2018-12-03 10:06
BUYING EXPENSIVE PC TO PLAY CS GIGALUL
2018-12-03 01:35
#25
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
XD
2018-12-03 01:35
#87
 | 
Israel _69 
Why not im playing on imac
2018-12-03 09:30
xdddddddd
2018-12-03 16:36
tweak your windows 10 and change your nvidia drivers. use oldest driver possible. and delete bloatware and bullshit on your computer. make sure you got the right bios settings too
2018-12-03 01:44
#35
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Ive changed some settings here and there and now i got 302 fps on the benchmarking test! I bet i can push it even higher with some better settings too!
2018-12-03 01:58
what settings lul
2018-12-03 02:42
lul
2018-12-03 08:40
considering your setup, your fps issue should be caused by either your Corsair 750W gold psu or maybe one of the two monitors
2018-12-03 02:50
#39
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
I dont see how the psu would bottleneck really... 750W should be plenty
2018-12-03 03:15
mr valve here, for sure Corsair 750W gold psu is the problem, or maybe one of the two monitors. thx
2018-12-03 03:37
#42
Germany pmb  
pasha computer school lmao
2018-12-03 03:36
pasha sarcasm school lmao
2018-12-03 03:38
When the shame gets big we're fighting for the "I wasn't serious" argument - quite common actually.
2018-12-03 09:24
#46
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
+1
2018-12-03 03:38
14 yo confirmed facepalm
2018-12-03 03:39
Imo the benchmark map is trash If u have good fps playing that's what matters
2018-12-03 03:38
#47
 | 
United States jay_320 
Don't know man. I have a 6700k at 4.8 and I get over 300. That's really odd because while the game isn't using anymore cores on your system their is absolutely an IPC increase and clock increase. No advice but really weird. How do you perform on Dust2? That map is the most likely to drop me under 300. Edit: It could very well be your ram. Both Ryzen and current Intel offerings like fast RAM. 3200mhz at least for best CPU performance. Now CSGO was made when DD3 was a thing so I don't know if that's your issue but you might try and see what kind of overclock you can get on your RAM. Don't worry about timings so much frequency is way more important unless you are going up to like CL18 timings.
2018-12-03 03:41
#49
NiKo | 
India se7eNNN 
Are you using 2 sticks of 8gb ram or a single stick of 16gb??
2018-12-03 06:39
#52
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
2x8
2018-12-03 08:07
#194
NiKo | 
India se7eNNN 
Idk then try format pc
2018-12-04 12:49
#53
 | 
World ZMDR 
I don't know who told you that ram speed doesn't make a difference but it most definitely does. Both latency and frequency affects FPS as long as you aren't GPU limited. Test for yourself and see.
2018-12-03 08:15
#62
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Alright mate
2018-12-03 08:36
#115
 | 
World ZMDR 
Also I realised you have a 1060, which is more than enough for normal CS but in the benchmark map they throw like 20 smokes together and that tanks your GPU even if you have a 1080Ti. If you play like 640x480 you should see your FPS shoot up, thats proof that its the GPU thats limiting you in the benchmark map.
2018-12-03 10:44
#56
 | 
Norway GnillePille 
you have cam fps?
2018-12-03 08:31
#61
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
No, i have used it before though... Ill use it when i get home and see what the results are
2018-12-03 08:36
#72
 | 
Norway GnillePille 
from my experience. cam fps made me get 120 fps. after disabling it i got 400 fps+. so from my experience, dont use it
2018-12-03 08:52
Oc ur ram a bit, 2666mhz at least
2018-12-03 08:31
#60
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
I will try when i get home, but honestly OCing ram doesnt seem worth it
2018-12-03 08:34
#64
sergej | 
Other awzaq 
it isnt worth it, there wont be any big difference
2018-12-03 08:37
#112
 | 
World ZMDR 
made a huge difference for me :)
2018-12-03 10:41
#117
sergej | 
Other awzaq 
makes a little difference on amd but even then it isn't much
2018-12-03 10:46
#193
 | 
World ZMDR 
makes a massive difference on ryzen and a noticeable difference on intel as long as its a cpu heavy workload
2018-12-04 09:06
#68
 | 
Slovakia veeellys 
If you have 270 fps on one monitor and you got 270 on second it's 540 man... Idk why you aren't satisfied
2018-12-03 08:42
#69
Czech Republic Wer_ 
Don't overclock too much
2018-12-03 08:42
#73
 | 
Denmark K0NG3N 
i got 320 fps with ryzen 2600x and RX580 8 gb.. don't buy intel and geforce..
2018-12-03 08:52
Your gpu is too weak for the 9600k
2018-12-03 08:55
Step one: fps_max 0 step two: Turn on the fps bar in game and not the benchmark step three: Realize you actually get 350+ step four: Complain you only get 350 fps step five: Turn all settings to the bare minimum. (4:3 stretched 768p, lowest settings on everything, etc. ) step six: try out 1.6 step seven: get 600fps step eight: Don't play anything but 1.6. step nine: source
2018-12-03 08:59
#88
 | 
Israel _69 
+1 LUL
2018-12-03 09:31
#77
 | 
Sweden kvarten 
Stop using those benchmark maps. They put you under situations you will NEVER be playing. +30 ppl and +10 smokes + bomb explosion... etc...
2018-12-03 09:06
#79
f0rest | 
Serbia NitrouZ 
are your temps normal on your cpu? cause overclocking with bad cooling may decrease the performance instead of increasing it.
2018-12-03 09:13
never overclock unless you have water cooling
2018-12-03 10:11
#113
 | 
World ZMDR 
some air coolers are better than most water coolers
2018-12-03 10:42
yeah
2018-12-03 11:41
#156
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Did yo even read my thread? I have fractal design S36
2018-12-03 16:01
That doesnt mean anything if u overclock it wrong or have badly set it up. U probably didnt even check temps since u are not answering my question. Have fun with your toasted cpu.
2018-12-03 16:39
First of all, do userbenchmark -test to see if your parts are actually performing like they should, if everything is fine there, then the problem is ur csgo settings
2018-12-03 09:19
fps_min 500 ez
2018-12-03 09:26
I have i7 3930k and i get 450 fps. Also can u post a screenshot of your ctrl+alt+del performance. I ihad same issue when i get this pc bit i managedto fix it.
2018-12-03 09:29
#90
 | 
Romania cTm|oNe 
Lol, you have 1060 what you want more, FPS are from GPU not CPU
2018-12-03 09:39
???????? csgo is more CPU, you need GPU for different games
2018-12-03 10:11
#105
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Nt
2018-12-03 10:20
even a 1060 barely has to lift a finger for CSGO lol... a 1070 might increase min-fps when there is a shitload of player models, props and smoke/molly/nade FX happening at the same time, but that's about it
2018-12-03 10:27
not sure what u mean, but all i can say is that you dont need overkill GPU to play cs, like 970 is fine
2018-12-03 11:42
I think you are replying to the wrong post. I am saying a 1060 more than enough for CSGO, so I agree with your post. the only difference would be in extreme scenarios that cause GPU load spikes, that will pull down your minimum fps results a little bit for a short moment. but those have virtually no impact on 99% of average gameplay, so the potential gains from a GPU upgrade will be close to none in a Source engine game.
2018-12-03 12:21
yeah
2018-12-03 12:37
What drugs are u using? they seem pretty effective
2018-12-03 14:04
#94
 | 
Denmark tsdrummer1 
If you done abit of reseach you can se here what fps you gonna get: youtu.be/QiNKMWc7xAU?t=153 And always if you want more fps, then upgrade your gpu. It will give amuch higher increase. Don't know what cpu you had before but will always recommend upgrading your gpu. But i would run with a gtx 1070 for 240hz
2018-12-03 09:55
your GPU is too low for that CPU u need to get atleast 1070
2018-12-03 10:14
#106
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Nt
2018-12-03 10:20
Why, I think it's the GPU too.. also you need to say what resolution you run on?
2018-12-03 10:35
no way, that GPU is never limiting in CSGO.. unless you get to 500+ fps. you can easily check that with MSI or GPUZ, I guarantee it does not reach anywhere near 90% load, may be even less than 70%. my 1070 barely gets to 50% load at 300fps because I'm so CPU limited. His 9600K is way faster than my 2500K and he should easily blow away my fps even with a slower 1060, which is only around 20% behind a 1070 in CSGO, and that's at MAX settings. On lowest settings, GPU is even less important. so stop this nonsense about better graphics card. may be for BF5, but not for a source engine game.
2018-12-03 11:23
Ok. I actually have the same CPU as him so I just ran the test for fun, I get 123 FPS on avg without a dedicated graphics card in 1280x1024 resolution with everything on low :D I will get a graphics card once the prices have come down to earth. :D
2018-12-03 12:13
At my local netcafe they have 1060 too on dual core AMD machines, the maps there is around 250fps, that was why I thought it was around normal. I didn't know the CPU was so important.
2018-12-03 12:14
well now you know better and with the integrated graphics, you're really shooting yourself in the foot lol you're taking away CPU resources for rendering purposes in a game that is already heavily limited by raw CPU calculations, so anything dedicated, even an ancient GTX 260 or 460 would probably double or triple your fps since we are talking DX9 here (even DX10 is now more than a decade old). hopefully, in the future we will get full Vulkan API support with the long awaited Source2 conversion for CSGO.
2018-12-03 12:41
It has nothing to do with his GPU lol, cs is not a game with some huge ass graphics like some other games. for example, if u play wow you and u want high fps you might need a good graphics card, but for cs you pretty much need a good CPU to get good fps. No point of investing 600 eu for 1070 if ure gonna play csgo
2018-12-03 11:45
LOL
2018-12-03 11:52
Out of curiosity, what are your rough average FPS at dust2 CT spawn 1920x1080, all settings low, no FXAA, no AF, etc. and do they drop significantly when you look around compared to not moving but looking at the same spot? I know I have the most ridiculous CPU bottleneck with my i5-2500k, 16GB DDR3-1600 and then a GTX1070 but I'm curious where I'm actually losing the most performance.
2018-12-03 10:42
What is you average fps in csgo ? We have similar pc so i'm just curious. I have 2500k@4.2Ghz,16GB DDR3@2133Mhz and GTX 1080 Ti. 5vs5 i get average fps about 220 and 350 + max.
2018-12-09 05:04
Oh yeah and i play on 1080p with MSAA 8x and 8x Filtering and everything else on low
2018-12-09 05:39
#116
 | 
Norway PhiliThunder 
Sure, CS might require some good CPU power, but how old are you all? XD CPUs today are like all good enough to run any game, it (all) comes down to your GPU. That video uses a 1080 and you have got a 1060 GPU, that is the clear difference in FPS, NOTHING else. Sry, and yes, slightly exaggerated.
2018-12-03 10:45
depends on what game ure playing
2018-12-03 11:49
GPU doesn't really matter that much in CSGO.
2018-12-03 11:53
#137
 | 
Norway PhiliThunder 
Not compared to other games no, but after all, it is making the frames. If you want higher FPS upgrade GPU, as long as CPU is good enough which in this case it is all the way up to a 1080/1080ti.
2018-12-03 12:07
#163
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Bull shit, i used to have a 1080 TI, but a bad cpu and got even worse fps than now with i5 9600k + 1060 6GB Plus GPU doesnt matter when i play everything on low and 4:3
2018-12-03 16:11
#165
 | 
Norway PhiliThunder 
Well then that CPU was def not good enough and prob old, which still goes by what i said. I would also advice you to reset all settings like OC and test
2018-12-03 16:23
#166
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Yes ryzen 1800x sooo bad right?
2018-12-03 16:25
#170
 | 
Norway PhiliThunder 
No, you then clearly had problems with that setup as well. Maybe the problem lies somewhere else in the pc. Does the low avg fps come as a result of framedrops or is the fps stable?
2018-12-03 16:36
#173
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Fps is stable, im just not satisfyed...
2018-12-03 16:38
#205
Lekr0 | 
Peru firey_ 
the gpu makes the frames the cpu processes it
2018-12-09 04:44
bois, pls stop fps threads csgo fps dont make sense at all, the engine was developped 20 years ago and gaben doesnt care if you take profits out of the newest hardware or not
2018-12-03 10:48
i got an older gen i5 oc'd to 4.5 and drops on newest maps under 180 fps causing lag and stutter. all began with nvidia drivers 38x.xx and updates from valve around that time (3D Audio, new maps). I dont get the scoreboard fps drop though. drops about 100 fps when I open it. thx panorama I guess..
2018-12-03 11:00
go back to stock cpu clock and reset bios. reinstall os. test to use win 10 drivers then install mobo chipset etc. and compare. use hwmonitor before and after. u should have bought 2666mhz ram btw. is it dual rank at least? probably not the issue but just in case; u got newest bios Firmware? good luck.
2018-12-03 11:02
500fps on a 2year laptop idk
2018-12-03 10:59
what laptop do u have
2018-12-03 11:48
origin eon 17x with a 7700k and 980m
2018-12-03 12:42
Bad overclock, maybe CPU throttle, bad RAM timings, unoptimized Windows 10. Download geekbench, give it a run and check if your CPU is performing the same as others 9700k.
2018-12-03 11:00
get better ram
2018-12-03 11:03
benchmark map is not showing you the real fps, i get like 40 on it when i have around 100 in pugs.
2018-12-03 11:48
what the hell is benchmark anyway
2018-12-03 11:50
lol 6700k 1060 400-500fps
2018-12-03 12:23
#142
ALEX | 
Spain ezivnisi 
i5 in 2018-2019 on cs go lul
2018-12-03 12:23
#143
ALEX | 
Spain ezivnisi 
i76700k + amd rx 480 8gb +400 fps ez
2018-12-03 12:24
#144
ALEX | 
Spain ezivnisi 
return that i5... i7 is the choice for this game
2018-12-03 12:24
shouldn't matter they are 6 core cpu's...
2018-12-03 12:25
#146
ALEX | 
Spain ezivnisi 
remember that major with that super i5's..... and all pros complaining about it ( epicenter i think)
2018-12-03 12:27
i had i5 6600k running 400+ tbh never had fps issues in cs :\ bet i could build something simular to him and get 500+ easily something doesn't seem right.
2018-12-03 12:30
#181
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Yeah, i had i5 6600k some time ago and the 9600k should just crush the 6600k easily... its wierd
2018-12-03 17:12
Hm I'm having 1070+8600k(overcklocked to 4.8)+16GB(overcklocked to 3GHz) and I'm getting something around 600 fps
2018-12-03 12:39
#160
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
no
2018-12-03 16:06
#152
 | 
Kazakhstan dc7 
cs go was engineered towards old hardware if you want maximum fps get a 4790k
2018-12-03 12:46
#159
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
no
2018-12-03 16:05
#153
 | 
Poland sajlent 
"ram 2400MHz" your rams are slow but you should be getting +350fps anyway maybe your cpu is overheating, mobo is throttling and clocks are going down from 5.1?
2018-12-03 13:01
#157
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
no
2018-12-03 16:05
You overclocked too bloody high, the system could be heating up, You need to specify other wise you won't get proper answers,
2018-12-03 13:06
#158
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
no
2018-12-03 16:05
#161
 | 
Turkey ravien9 
Hello mate, guess I remember you from RX 570 or GTX 1060 thread:) Go to this website, and run the test, so you can find out the which component has issue. cpu.userbenchmark.com/Software
2018-12-03 16:10
#178
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Here :) UserBenchmarks: Game 69%, Desk 85%, Work 69% CPU: Intel Core i5-9600K - 110.3% GPU: Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB - 65.6% SSD: Crucial M4 128GB - 58.6% SSD: Samsung 860 Evo 500GB - 1,145.6% HDD: WD Red 3TB (2012) - 53.5% RAM: Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB - 77.5% MBD: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING
2018-12-03 17:10
it's easy. you're most likely using "tickrate 128" launchoptions while the other dudes are still at the default tickrate 64 setting. that's a huge difference. your fps are fine.
2018-12-03 16:09
#179
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
But i play faceit?
2018-12-03 17:10
#164
 | 
Turkey tastemycobra 
You should use 2x8 ram.
2018-12-03 16:12
#176
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
i do
2018-12-03 17:04
How dumb are you?
2018-12-03 16:31
#177
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Thanks
2018-12-03 17:04
#180
 | 
France rezpecful 
CS:GO is gonna be worse on the upcoming components, you better get used to it
2018-12-03 17:12
#182
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Thank mr. Elon Musk
2018-12-03 17:13
#183
f0rest | 
United Kingdom akne 
Ram speed actually makes a significant enough difference in CSGO, look at their benchmarks and take at look at their memory speed.
2018-12-03 17:15
#187
 | 
Japan hirohito 
since csgo is very very very cpu dependent, ram will be a huge factor here you should've bought 3000mhz ram, 2400mhz is even under JEDEC spec, I would sell it now and wait for the ram to fall to it's proper price (50% of current), but i guess you don't want to wait about half a year or moreXD also I hope that you have it in dual channel, not having it in dc cuts your bandwidth literally in half also, if you're using disks from older computer, clean them, just getting rid of antivirus gave me +100 points in cinebench
2018-12-03 18:06
#201
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
I bought the ram in 2016 so back then 2400MHz was really high.. I have 8x2 dual channel, might clean my disks later
2018-12-09 03:05
> 16GB HyperX ram 2400MHz Fuck, what a moron.
2018-12-03 18:07
#200
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
oh? why?
2018-12-09 03:02
Hes commenting about the speed. 2400 mhz isnt fast nowadays but should perform fine
2018-12-09 05:05
2018-12-09 05:45
Good video. When I said perform fine Im referring to CSGO. You dont need 3000mhz ram to play the game. I get 300 fps + with 2600k and 780gtx with 1600mhz 16gb. Would 3000mhz help his CPU get the most FPS out of the game? Yes. But his problem lies elsewhere dont you agree?
2018-12-09 05:54
True. :)
2018-12-09 06:01
Enjoy: youtube.com/results?search_query=ddr4+21.. You paired a pretty good gaming CPU and a pretty good GPU with bottlenecking it RAM, that's why I said that, meant no offense tbh, just sad you spent that money and are not getting the best out of it.
2018-12-09 06:55
cs go became so shit after panorama idk fps went down
2018-12-03 18:32
Give me money
2018-12-03 18:42
Wait for source 2
2018-12-04 13:08
#202
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
thats like waiting for half life 3 at this point
2018-12-09 03:06
your oc is prolly not so stable mat_queue_mode 2 ultimate power profile
2018-12-09 03:30
#204
rain | 
Norway F1lur 
Kjøpte du oppgraderings pakken på komplett?
2018-12-09 04:33
#209
rain | 
Norway eirik2nd 
Nei
2018-12-09 05:03
#222
rain | 
Norway F1lur 
okei
2018-12-09 17:01
#208
 | 
Brazil 1_Flippy 
Its weird that you're not getting 300+ FPS on this rig, but here we go 1. Try to overclock your RAM through BLCK to 3200MHZ, tune the timings to a good balance, it can give you a considerable boost 2. Get rid of that huge amount of bloat in your launch options, most of the commands that you're using doesn't even work anymore, download a CSGO Benchmark tool and test multiple mat_queue_mode settings, for me -1 is the best one, @ i7 7700K. 3. If it didn't solve your problem download MSI Afterburner, and run cinebench for 10 minutes while taking a look at the temperatures, your CPU could be throttling. if none of that works, tell me and i can give you more instructions, that's pretty much the basic
2018-12-09 04:59
Unpark CPU Check to see if any cores are parked. If so, unpark them. coderbag.com/Uploads/Unpark-CPU-App.zip Remove all olders drivers with DDU (clean and restart) guru3d.com/files-details/display-driver-.. Download a graphics driver that is older(I'd start with Jan 2018) and install it and only check the box to install the graphics driver, no other experience bullcrap. Should give you an instant boost in FPS and you can try other drivers to see if others make it go up or down nvidia.com/Download/Find.aspx?lang=en-us
2018-12-09 05:15
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.