Thread has been deleted
Last comment
ARE YOU SERIOUS VALVE???
China SandEater 
After the update prime match making is filled with fucking cheaters lul (yeah even before update there were tons of cheaters in prime MM but not this amount) Do you really think giving prime status to ex non-prime players was a good move? I thought R8 update was the worst... Basically they gave this game to $5 cheaters and 9 yo fornite kids for free. RIP [*] Counter-Strike 1999-2018
2018-12-09 01:18
ie user?
2018-12-09 01:19
blotz farting his ass wtf
2018-12-09 02:43
XDDDDDDDDDDDF
2018-12-09 03:41
+1
2018-12-10 14:50
Community servers are at risk for cheaters, could hope they made prime community servers or something
2018-12-09 01:20
They have already created a command for Prime only server entry.
2018-12-09 01:22
Oh well that’s cool
2018-12-09 01:34
#29
 | 
Denmark Mr_Beast 
Hey why are you stealing my name wtf
2018-12-09 03:34
Yeah even in FFA servers I saw some idiot doing spinbot... This is ridiculous.
2018-12-09 01:31
#3
 | 
Ukraine ksay 
I suspect u are lil whiny b
2018-12-09 01:22
Yes i am :)
2018-12-09 01:24
#7
 | 
Portugal FrancisEdits 
If you had a good trust factor you wouldn't have those problems, so stop bitching about prime and start actually making the effort to be better
2018-12-09 01:32
How can I get a "good trust factor" when you can get reported just for 1 tapping people or pre-firing obvious spots ( I'm always trying to be nice and friendly btw). There are actually people who report opponents every time they get killed. Trust factor makes literally no sense.
2018-12-09 01:37
#11
 | 
Portugal FrancisEdits 
Getting reported for hacking doesn't mean much for your trust factor since they are basically all false reports. If you're getting reported for griefing that's where the problem is. A friend of mine used to get reported for cheating all the time and his trust factor is great just like mine. Do you perhaps have any behaviour outside of cs but inside of steam that could justify a lower trust factor? How many hours of cs do you have? For how long do you own the game?
2018-12-09 02:20
um... I've been playing this shit since 2014, and have 3k-ish hours of play time. And importantly I never shit talk inside/outside the game... I really don't understand what the hell is my problem :(
2018-12-09 02:29
#17
 | 
Portugal FrancisEdits 
Well me neither. I have 2k+ hours since 2015 and I've never had any problems with trust factor. The only times I can recall finding a cheater were when I deliberately queued with someone who's trust factor was way lower than mine I wish you the best of luck, my friend.
2018-12-09 02:35
Thank you mate. I will just wait 2-3 months until current ex- non prime cheaters get banned. Hope it will be better after next VAC wave.
2018-12-09 02:39
#19
 | 
Portugal FrancisEdits 
Do more overwatch cases as well. People always forget about it and it helps a lot.
2018-12-09 02:40
ah that would help as well. I will try some ty.
2018-12-09 03:33
Go play faceit tryhard kid
2018-12-09 01:41
#14
Ukraine KPI 
Same shit on faceit. So many accounts created 7th and 8th December. And those people use that new accounts to boost their main accounts. Or to abuse ladder.
2018-12-09 02:29
expect an update soon, valve already pushed out a "prime only" console command for community servers.
2018-12-09 13:25
Prime never existed in the first place, In an update mid way through this year they admitted that prime people still matched with non prime if there weren't enough primes. So pretty much they would try to, but not guaranteed. Therefore, prime = false sense of security.
2018-12-09 02:24
#15
 | 
Finland Smoonah 
shouldn't that be some sort of false advertisement?
2018-12-09 02:31
Sure, but false advertising happens all the time. Plus, it's their game. They could also say that it was mentioned in the update notes and therefore what can anyone do.
2018-12-09 02:46
#24
 | 
Finland Smoonah 
but was it? I mean there should be a line to a lie and a white lie, just like in life. I don't see why there should be any reason for a company to publish stuff that isn't true for no reason other than some kind of personal (company) gain, financially or whatever...
2018-12-09 02:48
It's because everyone complained about cheaters, so they introduced a false sense of security. People convince themselves that they see less cheaters in prime and therefore it must be working. But in reality it's just them thinking that they see less cheaters. Which ends in Valve not having to spend money implementing anything, and happier customers.
2018-12-09 02:53
#26
 | 
Finland Smoonah 
I'm just failing to see why they don't do something about it rather than lying and making the company look bad. They pay someone to put new chicken outfits on seasonally, could just as easily pay someone to fix the bugs in the game. They obviously don't care about the community at all.
2018-12-09 02:57
Correct, they do not care. Valve haven't cared about CS:GO for a very long time. Noticed how they stopped doing Operations a long time ago, Valve only cares about profit. They know that getting rid of cheaters once and for all would end up in them earning less. That's why the rarely do ban waves, because they want to wait long enough that the cheaters get enough enjoyment to want to repurchase an account to cheat again.
2018-12-09 03:00
#35
 | 
United States Jammin800k 
Lol everytime i see an operation come out i hear "dumb operations they should give us 128 tick and an invasive anti-cheat"
2018-12-09 04:00
Well that's because they should really have done both. 128 has been a standard in CS for a long time. Having bullets not register so often is pretty disappoint especially for such a competitive game. Operations were also required to keep the game interesting, so people were always disappointed when 128 never happened. Then valve just killed the game entirely and quit Operations.
2018-12-09 11:23
#44
 | 
United States Jammin800k 
Theyve stated multiple times that 128 would give too many players a disadvantage. And you're really going to let valve have invasive examination of the files on your PC, I really dont think the majority of the community would adhere to that.
2018-12-09 18:11
How would 128 disadvantage player's? Also, you don't need to have an invasive anti-cheat to have an anti-cheat better than VAC. Valve Anti cheat is garbage.
2018-12-10 00:27
#46
 | 
United States Jammin800k 
Because not everyone gets 128 fps Then maybe you should develop an anti cheat for valve because afaik theres not much more valve could do
2018-12-10 02:37
Are you kidding? Faceit didn't have a separate program for it's Anti-cheat until early this year or last year and it's anti-cheat has always been so much better than VAC. Not everyone get's 128 fps? Most people who don't get 128 fps have fps under 64 anyway. It's not their responsibility to make sure everyone has the right pc requirements. CS:GO is such a light game to run, and was a lot lighter like 3 years ago. Maybe valve just tell you that so that they sound like the nice guys without having to put any effort in.
2018-12-10 14:45
#54
 | 
United States Jammin800k 
You do realize how small the dev team on csgo is right? And where is your data to support that the majority of people under 128 fps have under 64 fps? That's literal guesswork, you have no idea what the average fps of the CSGO player is. And VACnet has actually been improved a lot, that's why they were comfortable making the game free to play, because they're confident they can catch a vast majority of cheaters if there is an influx. steamdb.info/stats/bans/ VAC has been doing a great job the last 2 years.
2018-12-10 21:43
You're saying 128 would disadvantage player's lower than 128 fps right. At the same time, 64 tick disadvantages everyone, no matter what their fps. The amount of bullet's that fail to register on 64 tick servers is utterly ridiculous, being "CS:GO'd" should not be a thing because of the garbage servers. Also as I said, it's not up to valve to worry about people's PC specs, CS is certainly on the easy to run side of games. What it is up to valve to worry about is bullet's registering in competitive games aka get better servers. Fix the hit boxes that always seem to be broken and fix the anti cheat. Showing me stats of how many bans Vac is doing doesn't prove anything. There are games other than CS that use VAC, and it does indicate how many cheaters it misses (which would be a lot more). Also I believe VAC and VACnet are different. VACnet is their "ai" of detecting cheats from player's but "cheater's" also need to be reviewed, they don't let it ban players.
2018-12-10 23:17
#56
 | 
United States Jammin800k 
64 tick doesnt disadvantage anyone, poor hit reg does which will be fixed with source 2 not with 128 tick. Valve has decided to keep the servers 64 tick so that players who get less than 128 frames arent at such a severe disadvantage. I mean the reason you want 128 tick is because you have a monitor of at least that spec and get at least 128 frames so to you it would be a large upgrade and make the game smoother. But not everyone has that luxury and therefore some players would immediately be disadvantaged in MM. How does a HUGE increase in bans I'm talking like 500-600% increase not indicate that VAC is finding a lot more accounts and successfully banning them? You're really going to assume none of those accounts are CSGO accounts when CSGO is the largest valve game with VAC atm? And even so VAC bans on accounts severely reduce trust factor in prime so if they do decided to cheat it's likely you wont get them if you're not accumulating a lot of reports. If that's not proof that the anti-cheat has been improved than what is?
2018-12-11 10:58
They do Vac waves very rarely. My point is that they can increase their anti-cheat effectiveness which can be seen in other games or services. But choose not to for what reason?
2018-12-11 11:07
#61
 | 
United States Jammin800k 
They're doing them much more frequently now and the point is to not tip off the cheat coders. What ways could they increase their effectiveness given their low man-power and what games can this been seen in? I really dont get cheaters that much in prime unless someone's trust factor is low
2018-12-11 11:20
#59
 | 
Finland vetu104 
Faceit did have an anticheat program that installed itself as a system driver since 2016 at least, when I started playing. Before that esea was bigger.
2018-12-11 11:13
Ah, must've been older than that then. I did first start playing in 2015 and it didn't then. I don't know about for ESEA though, I only played it for a week.
2018-12-11 11:15
So you can get non-primes when you are Qing with "Exclusively search for prime matches" ON? What kind of AIDS is that lul
2018-12-09 02:34
Yes that is correct.
2018-12-09 02:45
#20
United States koth 
Then play esea or faceit?
2018-12-09 02:42
It's just in your head. No more cheaters then before.
2018-12-09 03:37
If you don't see the amount of people crying about cheaters after the update... I think you just got lucky? Let's hope your luck lasts for long bud.
2018-12-09 03:56
I see people crying everyday about something. It's the new think in 2018. Cry for attention, Sjw and crap like that.
2018-12-09 03:57
#34
 | 
Finland tanux 
Csgo is now like fortnite because battle royale...
2018-12-09 03:59
MM did not change, cs go is cs go but you have the option to play battle royal.
2018-12-09 04:01
I bet you don't even own the free version
2018-12-09 13:26
#40
 | 
United Kingdom Newm1 
So many retards on this thread. Do you ever just consider some of the games you lose you just fucking suck. Me(LEM) and my 4 other friends who are dmg dmg gn2 and lem played 8 games yesterday and only had one cheater adn we won that game anyways. stop fucking complaining and just better. peace
2018-12-09 13:28
lul yeah I still remeber my LE-LEM days, I always thought GEs complaining about cheaters are just bullshit until I actually reached GE and had cancerous experiences in the game. As you see, very few people use cheat to play a LEM (or even lower rank considering you had fucking DMG and GN2 in the team) game. or you are just baiting?
2018-12-09 14:26
#50
 | 
Denmark MeToxi 
If you are GE then why the fuck are you still playing MM instead of faceit?
2018-12-10 14:59
Hes obv baiting or just autistic, my road from supreme to global on my main took like 20wins 5draws 3losses and it was the most cancerous experience ever, including 5 stacks that were losing 14-5 and won 16-14 after toggling aimbots and shit like that and it even was pre-update. Yesterday i played on my lem smurf and lost to a bunch of dmg's going 41-10, disgusting stuff
2018-12-10 15:00
#42
 | 
Croatia mds818 
Mate... I don't have ANY problems with the cheaters and I barely meet them
2018-12-09 14:29
#49
 | 
Denmark MeToxi 
If I had a penny for all the times someone accused me of cheating in mm.
2018-12-10 14:52
Insane players with steam lvl 1 accounts.
2018-12-10 15:11
trust factor is still there , so i dont see whats the problem
2018-12-10 15:14
#57
 | 
Korea Jardeet 
I've had a lot of cheaters in danger zone too
2018-12-11 11:06
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.