Thread has been deleted
Last comment
S1MPLE LOL
 | 
Lithuania ban_gla1ve_ffs 
it's been 13.8 billion years and s1mple still can't get top 1 hltv hahahhahahahaha
2018-12-09 03:55
#1
 | 
Serbia dukeny 
nah actually around 6000 years, but yeah +1
2018-12-09 03:56
#2
 | 
Lithuania ban_gla1ve_ffs 
no the universe is 13.8 billion years old
2018-12-09 03:56
#3
 | 
Serbia dukeny 
nah its falsifield, read bible
2018-12-09 03:57
#4
 | 
Serbia dukeny 
We don't know exact universe age, but this is in earth case
2018-12-09 03:57
#6
 | 
Lithuania ban_gla1ve_ffs 
if earth is only 6000 years old then how were the dinosaurs alive
2018-12-09 03:58
#10
 | 
Serbia dukeny 
dinosaurs actually lived nearly 4500y ago, flood caused their extinction.
2018-12-09 04:00
then how did they have time for evolution to kick in so fast
2018-12-09 04:04
#21
 | 
Serbia dukeny 
evolution didn't happen on any species, everything was completely different after flood, including people.
2018-12-09 04:05
then what about before the flood
2018-12-09 04:06
#42
apEX | 
United Kingdom UKChef 
nothing just darkness, God created everything
2018-12-09 04:13
#54
United States koth 
Then why did the dinosaurs that flew die?
2018-12-09 04:29
#56
 | 
Serbia dukeny 
they did, we don't know exact size of flood, nothing like todays oceans but yeah
2018-12-09 04:34
#62
United States koth 
But you can't have more water than is already on earth, so there will always be areas of land.
2018-12-09 04:51
#78
apEX | 
United Kingdom UKChef 
yes you can, what do you think happens when the moon gets closer to the earth... water is just hydrogen and oxygen nothing more
2018-12-09 05:32
#89
United States koth 
So you are saying the moon creates water? The moon creates high tides and would be unable to create any substantial flood. Also to create water at that amount you would blow up the earth with all the heat you would need for the activation energy. Nice try though.
2018-12-09 12:49
#90
apEX | 
United Kingdom UKChef 
you don't need to create water just melt all the ice around the globe to achieve high water levels
2018-12-10 01:27
#96
United States koth 
But that will only raise water levels like 3 or 4 meters? So pretty much not a major flood? 90% of land would still be above the water.
2018-12-10 01:48
why are you falling for this shit bait lol
2018-12-10 01:35
#95
United States koth 
You believe im falling for it? Im just having fun.
2018-12-10 01:46
0/8
2018-12-11 01:58
#94
 | 
World Damon1174 
But hang on if you can just make stuff up so can I Nah the earth is only about 200 years old and everything before then is fake
2018-12-10 01:41
#91
 | 
Brazil JMB_17 
You really believe in evolution? Do you really think a T-rex became a fucking chicken? lol
2018-12-10 01:30
#105
 | 
Brazil Vitor_IS 
hur dur
2018-12-10 05:11
4500 years OMEGALUL
2018-12-09 04:05
#34
 | 
Serbia dukeny 
ye right
2018-12-09 04:09
0/8 retarded serb LUL
2018-12-09 04:05
#31
 | 
Serbia dukeny 
kebab | Turkey ToxicTurk
2018-12-09 04:09
science doesnt lie, the earth is more than 6,000 years old u retard :)
2018-12-09 04:27
#52
 | 
Serbia dukeny 
science doesn't people do /closed
2018-12-09 04:28
/open so people lie about the bible as well :) /close
2018-12-09 04:28
#57
 | 
Serbia dukeny 
stick with quaran, but seeing you are fakeflagging so idk
2018-12-09 04:35
bible is FAKE and LIES islam is TRUTH and HOPE may allah have mercy on you, because god will not because he is NOT REAL! HE IS FAKE praise allah and you might be saved :)
2018-12-09 04:43
#71
 | 
Georgia Satan_p 
aaxaxaxaxaxaxaxaxaxaxaxaxaxaxax
2018-12-09 05:01
#73
f0rest | 
Argentina Nawll 
And so the battle of retardation continued until the last 2 brain cells perished in battle
2018-12-09 05:12
argentina talking about brain cells LUL
2018-12-09 05:28
#81
f0rest | 
Argentina Nawll 
yeah specially since the bullshit biased world ranking of IQ by country put us higher than Turkey OMEGALUL
2018-12-09 05:36
fake ranking, nt argentina LUL
2018-12-09 05:39
#83
f0rest | 
Argentina Nawll 
That's what i said retard, that ranking is obviously biased towards the northern hemisphere
2018-12-09 05:42
fake ranking but nt we are smarter than argentina LUL
2018-12-09 05:56
#85
f0rest | 
Argentina Nawll 
i don't even know what i expected replying to you lmao
2018-12-09 06:03
#72
BOOBIE | 
United States lybrel 
n1
2018-12-09 05:09
#70
 | 
Georgia Satan_p 
Egyptian and Persian empires are more than 7000yo..
2018-12-09 05:01
believing godzilla is real in 2018 lmaoooo
2018-12-09 04:01
the bible was created by members of the church in 315 after christ. dont believe anything thats written in there.
2018-12-09 04:55
#67
 | 
Serbia dukeny 
and there's original scriptures haha nt
2018-12-09 04:57
#97
fruit | 
Canada sunriser 
you think scriptures were fabricated at ecumenical councils? that's some next level conspiracy
2018-12-10 01:50
there wasnt a concensus between churches before 315. They all had their own scriptures that sometimes even contradicted each other. In 315 at the council of Nicae the church decided on one uniform document that all churches should follow from there on. I used to study history and this is what ive been told by a very credible professor.
2018-12-10 03:30
you got the date and the name wrong, and there was never a debate on what is canon for the new testament, nor was there any voting on what should be included at the council of nicaea. and deciding what is canon isn't "creating the bible" anyway.
2018-12-10 04:52
hmm. my bad then. I googled the date and name, as its been 5 years since I heard about it.
2018-12-10 13:24
#5
 | 
United States Jammin800k 
Bible true!
2018-12-09 03:57
#7
 | 
Serbia dukeny 
+6000
2018-12-09 03:59
The bible was written for suckers. Same with all the religious books around the world. Islam is totally a scam and false. Some drunken molesters wrote that religion. You can tell how easy it was for them to control the Muslims. They believe anything. 72 virgins!! WEeeeeee, what do the ladies get? A stoning for eternity?
2018-12-09 04:03
#12
 | 
United States Jammin800k 
Dukeny says read bible cause bible true
2018-12-09 04:01
#13
 | 
Serbia dukeny 
hah cry
2018-12-09 04:01
if god doesnt exist, then who wrote the bible? checkmate, atheists
2018-12-09 04:36
#60
 | 
Serbia dukeny 
that's unironically actually +700
2018-12-09 04:41
#65
f0rest | 
Argentina Nawll 
oh shit! check mate atheist Pog
2018-12-09 04:56
#69
Lekr0 | 
Peru synergy_ 
love bible :)
2018-12-09 05:00
what if bible 13.8billions + 6,000 old?
2018-12-11 02:11
"read bible" lol
2018-12-11 09:24
#142
 | 
Brazil Vatts 
lmao
2018-12-11 21:34
4.5 billion years.
2018-12-09 04:00
#16
 | 
Serbia dukeny 
just a randomly assumed theories by authorities, nothing special
2018-12-09 04:02
Yeah like the bible is any different
2018-12-09 04:31
expected from serbian education
2018-12-11 09:26
I heard a different story and I will keep on believing that.
2018-12-09 04:05
#23
 | 
Serbia dukeny 
Ye just search for 'creation' vs evolution
2018-12-09 04:05
Creation is a fairy tale and evolution has the nature to back it up. Both can't be proven but nature craft is more probable so.
2018-12-09 04:06
#28
 | 
Serbia dukeny 
nature to back it up? give me one proof that evolution happened i'll convert
2018-12-09 04:08
None side has enough proof but it's up to you to what to believe, some animal species have evolved throughout time and it's been proven so why man couldn't have? Rather than believing tales from the book.
2018-12-09 04:11
#39
 | 
Serbia dukeny 
not a single proof for any type of evolution actually but yeah, +1
2018-12-09 04:12
There's many if I bothered to find but I'm not, I got my mind made up, can't really care about yours.
2018-12-09 04:15
#86
 | 
United Kingdom shmilx 
Adaptations of Iguanas that floated to Anguila. They were originally Green Iguanas, but evolved to fit their new habitat. It's all well and good to have faith in something, but denying facts is just silly
2018-12-09 06:16
#98
fruit | 
Canada sunriser 
adaptation isn't "evolution"
2018-12-10 01:52
#100
 | 
United Kingdom shmilx 
Evolution is adaptation on a larger scale, it is continued adaptation. Evolution is gradual changes spanning several years. Adaptation may not be evolution, but we can infer from the existence of adaptation that through thousands opon thousands of years evolution is correct. Who knows? maybe creationism (whether it is the way portrayed by religion or not) was what started it all, then evolution created the diversity of creatures we see today. Although I don't believe that, it's a plausable theory. Plus, fossils and carbon dating prove evolution. A quick google search and basic knowledge can link adaptation and evolution
2018-12-10 04:20
fossils actually disprove evolution since the intermediate fossils between species don't exist. the only thing carbon dating proves is that the earth is 6000 years old btw (if u take the rate of carbon in the atmosphere it would have to have started around 6000-8000 years ago), carbon "dating" literally doesn't work since you need to know how much carbon was initially there. adaptation is an observable phenomenon. evolution, the creation of new species, is not observable and has never been observed, it's pseudo science.
2018-12-10 04:58
#109
 | 
United Kingdom shmilx 
There are intermediate fossils lol, humans are a simple example. You said carbon dating proves Earth is only 600 years old, but then say it doesn't work??? And that's not how carbon dating works. It's not how much carbon is there, it's the ratio of carbon 14 to 15. They literally teach this in basic physics for 15/16 year olds. You clearly have no idea what carbon dating even is if you're thinking about carbon dating from the atmosphere, you take a sample of a carbon based material and find the ratio of C-14 to C-15. Please don't talk about things you have no idea about. Once again, a quick google search on your part could have saved both of us some time. And the Anguillan Iguanas are a new species (evolved from Green Iguanas), this has been observed rather recently, it's not pseudo science, it's a simple fact. And why make the argument at all about observation being proof? Even if it hadn't been observed (it has like I said, but hypothetically) when has anything from creationism or any holy book been 'observed'. Did you know Noah lived to the age of 950? Idk about you, but that seems a bit more unbelievable than adaptation due to changes in environment throughout thousands of years.
2018-12-10 16:03
#115
 | 
United Kingdom shmilx 
or you could carbon date the rocks, far more accurate as it's much more unlikely to be lost to space space.com/24854-how-old-is-earth.html smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/how-do-we-.. geomaps.wr.usgs.gov/parks/gtime/ageofear.. Edit: Gene Kim is a nutjob, even by pastor's standards worthychristianforums.com/topic/224522-a.. friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2017/01/11/p.. and he uses the RATE scientists proof, which has been debunked lol noanswersingenesis.org.au/aig_no_researc.. oldearth.org/rate_index.htm
2018-12-11 08:07
lol how could u carbon date something that isnt even organic
2018-12-11 08:24
#118
 | 
United Kingdom shmilx 
>rock >inorganic pick one You're baiting, right?
2018-12-11 08:28
nice teen arrows but I pick both, rocks are not organic
2018-12-11 08:45
#120
 | 
United Kingdom shmilx 
kids-fun-science.com/organic-rocks.html something for your brain power ;) And something doesn't have to be organic to be carbon dated, the atmosphere isn't fully organic but you and the guy in ur video used it as an exmaple to prove C-dating is used to determine the Earth is 6000 yrs old. Stop baiting pls
2018-12-11 08:48
lol u know this article is talking about a subset of rocks called organic rocks, not what the word "rocks" is referring to. something does need to be carbon based to carbon date it, and the carbon dating of the atmosphere is using the CARBON in the atmosphere. did you actually think rocks are organic :D:D:D:D
2018-12-11 08:51
#122
 | 
United Kingdom shmilx 
Sedimentry rocks are all organic lmao. Even inorganic rocks are mostly carbon based (unless they're minerals) Did you actually think the Earth was 6000 yrs old :D:D:D:D:D. You get dumber with every post. Also fully inorganic things can be dated by using things other than carbon. Carbon dating is just the most common because so many things on Earth contain carbon (including most rocks) igws.indiana.edu/RocksAndMinerals pls stop baiting
2018-12-11 08:56
yes, "sedimentary rocks", not ROCKS :DDDD
2018-12-11 09:02
#124
 | 
United Kingdom shmilx 
Nice, address one thing. Sedimentry rocks are rocks believe it or not lol, it's sort of in the name
2018-12-11 09:03
they are not equivalent u moron, it's a subset. u put nothing else worth addressing, all garbage. ur an idiot if u actually believe "evolution".
2018-12-11 09:09
#126
 | 
United Kingdom shmilx 
Oh dear, you're retarded, don't dispute anything keep blindly following a 2000yr old book. A subset is still part of the overarching set. Not all rocks are organic, but several are. "How do you even carbon date something that is inorganic" "the carbon dating of the atmosphere is using the CARBON in the atmosphere" you answered your own question which was your entire argument against carbon dating rocks. You have to be literally braindead to not believe in evolution at all
2018-12-11 09:14
"Not all rocks are organic, but several are." so you admit it now that you realize how retarded you were XD
2018-12-11 09:29
#131
 | 
United Kingdom shmilx 
You claimed rocks aren't organic, but say there is a subset of rocks that are organic. XD We were both wrong, kind of. But you still cant dispute any other points lol stop baiting
2018-12-11 12:43
you have no points
2018-12-11 12:50
#134
 | 
United Kingdom shmilx 
I've made several, you've made a dispute to one of them. You'r e braindead or baiting
2018-12-11 12:51
no, you haven't.
2018-12-11 12:51
#136
 | 
United Kingdom shmilx 
obvious bait lol
2018-12-11 13:18
What you mean both can't be proven? Evolution has already been proven with observation, as in we can actually see it happening in different species who live long enough in different habitat and evolve to better suit their needs. Anything that exists today has an origination that is different than it's evolved state, trees, any living organism, any living creature that walks the planet was different from it's current evolution this is what proves evolution is real through observation. Bible/Quran is a book written a long time ago by primitive beings, I mean not even a debate also want to mention how people still follow a book written so long ago like it has any relevance in the modern world? If anything these books are more historical artifacts because they document some events which again science has proven actually took place and give us some insight into life and society in those times. I tried reading some of the old testament a while back and I was thinking how people can follow such a douche bag same with Mohammed, a pedophile, how people can blindly follow such degenerates who are merciless to their own followers?
2018-12-09 04:56
Evolution can't give answers as to how did it all begin and what caused it. It can tell us how we got to this point but not how it's all started. Creation has answers but those can't be proven. So I'd rather stick to the nature still.
2018-12-09 05:23
Obviously not and that isn't what the theory is trying to do either imo. Religion is full of shit, written ages ago, has literally no relevance in the real world today yet people still blindly follow it through indoctrination most of the time, brainwashed from youth before they have any cognitive capabilities.
2018-12-09 05:33
It's understood, nobody should take religion seriously nowadays, the only god we can somehow believe in is the nature, nature owns it so it's the boss here anyway. Religion is for the weak minded people who can't get through their trouble on their own, they'd be worried either way, they just were brought up in this way.
2018-12-09 05:35
#25
 | 
Brazil HateSmithzz 
shut the fuck up you fucking dumb moron using perfect grammar in an online forum like its some english exam u fucking idiot go kill urself honestly u make me vomit if i ever meet you, ill bash your fucking head in kid
2018-12-09 04:06
Oh, pity your soul, what a bad parents some kids may have.
2018-12-09 04:07
#38
 | 
Brazil HateSmithzz 
AHAHAHA SO JUST CUZ THEY DONT WATCH OVER MY SHOULDER 10 HOURS A DAY WHILE I SIT ON HLTV MAKING SURE I USE GOOD GRAMMAR OR I GET MY ASS WHOOPED THAT MEANS I HAVE BAD PARENTS XDDD JOKES ON U I DONT HAVE PARENTS LMFAO BUT IM SERIOUS IM GONNA BASH UR FUCKING HEAD IN WHEN I FUCKING SEE U IM VISITING FINLAND NEXT YEAR :))))))))) AND IM NOT A KID LMAO IM 32 YEARS OLD XDD
2018-12-09 04:11
Don't skip the school child.
2018-12-09 04:15
#49
 | 
Brazil HateSmithzz 
IM OLDER THAN YOU L0L XDDDD OH AND "THE SCHOOL"?????? WTF NICE GRAMMAR LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO UR SO FUCKING SHIT U MAKE ME FUCKING SICK BTW #15 AND #18 REPLY, DID BAN GLA1VE FFS ASK YOU???? YOU'RE A HYPOCRITE AND A RETARD, GOODJOB
2018-12-09 04:17
You're most definitely a kid! 12-15 years old, no more. Yes, it doesn't seem pretty from me but I made a statement with information and the point was to correct because I really think so, 'dukeny' just disagreed without adding anything. That reply is worthless.
2018-12-09 04:21
pls share this story
2018-12-09 04:16
I have to go soon but you can bother me in my PM and I will ;)
2018-12-09 04:17
#15
 | 
Serbia dukeny 
wrong
2018-12-09 04:01
I didn't ask you.
2018-12-09 04:04
13,798±0,037 B years
2018-12-11 09:25
+1
2018-12-09 04:35
#29
 | 
Australia CaZeR01 
Prove it
2018-12-09 04:08
#30
 | 
Serbia dukeny 
wha?
2018-12-09 04:08
#32
 | 
Australia CaZeR01 
Or ill kill you
2018-12-09 04:09
look up all hltv top 20s
2018-12-09 04:09
The earth is 2018 years old tho
2018-12-09 04:09
ye but im talking about the age of the universe not earth
2018-12-09 04:10
Ye but where did he come from then? S1mple alien confirm?
2018-12-09 04:12
s1mple is part of the universe so he could've born anywhere even on mars
2018-12-09 04:13
Wow dis I didn't knew
2018-12-09 04:13
lul
2018-12-09 04:55
S1MPLE LUL EARTH YEARS LUL
2018-12-09 05:31
S1MPLE LUL EARTH YEARS LUL
2018-12-09 05:31
+1
2018-12-11 21:33
#87
 | 
Brazil cadik 
+1 s1mple only can trash talk that he is good meanwhile he is not even top 5 kkkkkkkk
2018-12-09 06:26
#88
 | 
Ukraine dieded_inside 
people in this thread are baiting so hard xd
2018-12-09 06:29
#znajder_1_major_streample_0_major #neverforget
2018-12-10 01:33
#dosya_1_major_steample_0_major #neverforget
2018-12-10 04:26
#zeus_1_major_steample_0_major #neverforget
2018-12-11 02:10
#102
 | 
Australia BTwice 
Youll get promoted to teller soon at your local pizza joint bro. While simple will still be a pro gamer. Joke post.
2018-12-10 04:48
#106
 | 
United States xxxhoshi 
p1mple won't make the list
2018-12-10 08:10
s1mple is 21 years old. he will win at some point, given that CS still exists :P
2018-12-10 13:25
#110
 | 
Korea yooz 
1 year and cs dies, too late
2018-12-10 16:09
#117
 | 
Luxembourg alex24 
at 21 you are close to death in ukrainian years :D
2018-12-11 08:27
#137
 | 
Ukraine SLGay 
Not true, u either die at 10 yo or at 60+ Stfu Luxembourghinho
2018-12-11 13:26
He is top 1 anyway guys. U know it
2018-12-11 12:47
This year is his year 100% and he will be #1 2018. He was miles ahead of device.
2018-12-11 13:30
lol... 0/8
2018-12-11 14:30
What is 0/8 here? I stated the fact that he was by far the best player and surely much better than device. Device is not even best in his own team dude. The fact that Astralis are dominating team doesn't mean that Device is best player or something.. They are just the best AS A TEAM. But S1mple did UNHUMAN shit this year and by the way 2-3 years before he was the same beast, just with worse team.
2018-12-11 17:40
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.