Thread has been deleted
Last comment
WW3 THREAD
Turkey smarthltvuser 
[THIS IS JUST AN ASSUMPTION THREAD. WE ALL HOPE WW3 NEVER HAPPENS. THE REPLIES AND THE THREAD SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY BY ANYONE. THANKS] Lets discuss what your country should do if ww3 happens. Tell me about your country. If ww3 starts tomorrow, what do you think your country will do and what do you think your country should do and what will you do? Roasting between countries allowed. just don't be racist, thats all. /discuss
2019-01-09 18:53
Annexed by russia.
2019-01-09 18:53
will or should?
2019-01-09 18:55
Will, probably.
2019-01-09 18:57
do you think it is best for Sweden?
2019-01-09 18:58
No, not at all. I think that no matter what happens during ww3 we're pretty much done for anyways
2019-01-09 18:59
I understand this type of thinking from my perspective, I mean seriously, why does NL even have an army, if the shit goes down there would be Germany, France, UK, and all surrounding countries going up first... As if this tiny little country is going to make a difference, yet there is so much money wasted on military crap, it's unbelievable.. There is no need for that shit, there are different sectors here that badly need the money.
2019-01-09 19:06
But I'm not against military spending tho.
2019-01-09 19:11
#102
 | 
Finland 4zera 
you have Finland between you and russia?
2019-01-10 09:24
#104
 | 
Finland 4zera 
how could you be annexed
2019-01-10 09:24
let's pretend Finland still stands a chance. against russia.
2019-01-10 09:47
#112
 | 
Finland 4zera 
XD?? russia doesnt stand a chance
2019-01-10 10:15
LOL "Finnish concessions and territorial losses exceeded Soviet pre-war demands. Before the war, the Soviet Union demanded that the frontier between the USSR and Finland on the Karelian Isthmus be moved westward to a point 30 kilometres (19 mi) east of Vyborg to the line between Koivisto and Lipola, that existing fortifications on the Karelian Isthmus be demolished, and the islands of Suursaari, Tytärsaari, and Koivisto in the Gulf of Finland and Rybachy Peninsula be ceded. In exchange, the Soviet Union proposed ceding Repola and Porajärvi from Eastern Karelia, an area twice as large as the territories originally demanded from the Finns" TWICE AS LARGE AS ORIGINALLY DEMANDED
2019-01-15 17:01
#269
 | 
Finland 4zera 
and so what? This is pure wisdom after the events
2019-01-15 18:39
Historically Finns are kryptonite for Russians, just like Russians are kryptonite for Germans. So yeah, Finnish boy has his point Proud Na`Vi fan, S1mplus_Electroncere.
2019-01-10 10:18
"Historically Finns are kryptonite for Russians, just like Russians are kryptonite for Germans." Wrong, it was the winter and being on home soil that made Finland and Russia win. Just like Vietnam against USA (not the winter part). Having big unpopulated terrain with many opportunities for ambushes is a big advantage.
2019-01-10 11:05
#137
 | 
Finland 4zera 
Finland_2_WAR_wins_russia_1_war_win
2019-01-10 11:31
Talvisota was lose tbh nice try man
2019-01-10 20:40
#199
 | 
Finland 4zera 
was it? did finland get conquered? did SU accomplish their plans as they were to invade helsinki and cut finland in half in 2 weeks
2019-01-11 11:58
It actually was lose. Btw learned AT LUKIO. And its on fresh memory. People like to call it victory or make it heroic.. meanwhime we lost. NT
2019-01-13 22:53
#228
 | 
Finland 4zera 
gut? english learnered from lukio alsO? :DDDDDDDDD How is it a lose if u reach ur goal and the enemy does not at all :D yes, finland had to make a peace treaty to avoid getting conquered, but considering the circumstances, we actually won in terms of victims and keeping the independence, no matter how much you want to say that we "lost"
2019-01-13 23:08
We lost. Learnt from elementary school
2019-01-14 15:13
Aika surullista että ajattelet että oltaisiin voitettu kun virallisestihhan se oli häviö. NT 0/8 Nc amis logics
2019-01-14 15:16
Also sorry wait. You mean sureendering is winning? XDD fking logics man pls
2019-01-14 15:18
#233
 | 
Finland 4zera 
ahahauhauehuhe Hf in life as a grocery store salesman after being graduated from the so high demaning high school XDD Also, could you link me the source of unconditional surrender of the finnish government? oh u cant? cuz we didnt surrender unconditianolly) nt ruskie normo lukiokid kaupankassa L:D oh thats what i thought.
2019-01-14 17:10
Vitun retu osaakko käyttää INTERNETTIÄ
2019-01-15 14:29
#251
 | 
Finland 4zera 
XD so can u deliver me the proof of finnish government delivering an UNCONDITIONAL surrender agreement during the winter war 1939, oh u cant? yea go back to school ty
2019-01-15 15:47
+1 Remember the white death?
2019-01-10 14:19
#235
 | 
Europe deVulse 
uhm...but USA stomped vietnam dude, did you actually read casualties reports by both sides? Also USA didnt even try, they could send there milions of soliders and instead they sent only few hundred thousands, i mean its still a lot but not much for a 300 milion country, right? They just withdraw cuz they didnt have any interests fighting there anymore, thats all.
2019-01-14 18:58
"uhm...but USA stomped vietnam dude, did you actually read casualties reports by both sides? " Casualties dont mean much. Otherwise Germany would have won WW2. You have to put it into perspective. Losing 60.000 troops against some under- equipped hobby-soldiers is a loss.
2019-01-14 19:19
#240
 | 
Europe deVulse 
considering vietnam lost 1 milion, 60k is not much + usa unlike germany vs soviets had number advantage (if they wanted the could easily send more, much more troops) and it was them who took smaller casualties unlike russians lul. You're right that casulties numbers arent fully relevant source of who's better, but its still something, especially when difference is so huge, also ww2 example is bad because Germans would probably win if they didnt have to fight on 2 fronts, keep all the uprisings in occupied countries and also soviets were supported with USA's resources. Anyway, my point is that if they really wanted they could easily wipe out whole vietnam and without even using nukes. Saying otherwise is just stupid and ignorant or probably driven be either some anti-usa hate or just jealousy.
2019-01-15 08:53
Dude, youre entirely missing the point. I know USA could have wiped out Vietnam. They killed half of Vietnams whole population (most of them were civilians). You have to put the casualties into perspective. And losing 60.000 trained soldiers, with a ridiculous amount of equipment, against a completely under-equipped "army" of rebels is a loss. And that doesnt mean that Vietkong won the war. A war can have 2 losers. My point was and is: The terrain enabled the Vietkongs to kill way more american soldiers than they otherwise would have been.
2019-01-15 10:27
dont bother, he is retarded
2019-01-16 02:42
#276
 | 
United States codgun 
Every country west of Finland should be grateful, including NA, we're very lucky to have GOD Finland.
2019-01-15 23:56
you are not meaningful country, even Poorland is more valuable my maastricht friend
2019-01-15 18:41
We will save u just like in ww2
2019-01-10 10:52
doubt it, I think Russia have learned also during the winter war they made shit overcomplicated hence they failed. If they'd just follow the first invasion plan they'd actually take Finland.
2019-01-10 11:16
#138
 | 
Finland 4zera 
why u say shit like this? not true
2019-01-10 11:35
It is mate
2019-01-10 13:40
#157
 | 
Finland 4zera 
only reason you even exist is finland
2019-01-10 14:14
Pretty true since I'm 62% finnish
2019-01-10 15:09
#163
 | 
Finland 4zera 
i think youre a russian fake flagger :)
2019-01-10 15:54
2% eastern european so maybe yes
2019-01-10 16:37
#245
 | 
Denmark Twick_ 
By Denmark but both is good
2019-01-15 14:42
if you take Sweden, Denmark will be annexed by russia then :)
2019-01-15 15:01
#250
 | 
Denmark Twick_ 
No because they got Finland so they are happy
2019-01-15 15:24
Russians and finns cant be happy
2019-01-15 16:49
#254
 | 
Denmark Twick_ 
But Russians are happy because they control the Finns And Norway and Sweden is happy because we saved them from bad Russia ;)
2019-01-15 16:51
Surprise nuke the west and rule the radioactive wasteland.
2019-01-09 18:55
which country lmao
2019-01-09 18:55
he's ruski
2019-01-09 19:13
#97
device | 
Denmark CaraX_ 
*North Korea This guy is Kim Jong Un the only guy with internet in NK
2019-01-10 09:15
#236
 | 
Europe deVulse 
lmao
2019-01-14 18:59
stay neutral as always cant stop winning
2019-01-09 18:55
who would fucking care about your neutral position if eu will suck?
2019-01-09 18:59
Your banks saves you. Everyone has money in switzerland so no one wants to touch. Maybe it is so safe but it is boring :/
2019-01-09 18:59
boring >>>> getting killed while fighting for rich politicans
2019-01-09 19:00
we are going to die anyway it really doesn't matter 100 years of life is just too short xD
2019-01-09 19:09
100 years if you are lucky xD but i want to see the future instead of dying a useless death
2019-01-09 19:10
#200
Zeus | 
Finland Olter 
Expected from biggest pussies in history
2019-01-11 11:59
#6
 | 
Brazil Fallenzera 
We would dominate South America, Then Africa We would be so huge that 1st worders would prefer leave us alone.
2019-01-09 18:55
You'd be more vulnerable
2019-01-09 19:05
You won't even be able to get past Panama.
2019-01-09 19:17
#59
 | 
Brazil Fallenzera 
Well i haven't said anything about central america though
2019-01-09 19:57
HAHAHHAHAHAHA SUREEEEE
2019-01-10 02:53
#93
YEKINDAR | 
Albania lxxl2 
coldzera is going to jumping awp no scope collateral all of his enemies
2019-01-10 05:49
#122
 | 
Liberia weALLcheat 
yeah with rocks and sticks
2019-01-10 10:43
#237
 | 
Europe deVulse 
+1 lmao xD
2019-01-14 19:00
I wonder what kind of benefit you get from Africa. Not talking about ebola
2019-01-10 20:42
Brazil can rob Africa since the continent is extremely rich in resources kek.
2019-01-10 20:45
#7
 | 
Norway SaltySausage 
take USA’s troops and moneys
2019-01-09 18:56
2019-01-09 18:56
#34
 | 
Norway SaltySausage 
norway and the us are in NATO they have to give us free shit even though we dont hold up our end of the deal
2019-01-09 19:09
#8
 | 
Denmark Xipingu 
Taken over by Russia before we can respond. Next
2019-01-09 18:56
xdd rlyy ?
2019-01-10 05:45
#170
 | 
Denmark Xipingu 
Denmark is small. How do you reckon we can defend against a bloody batalion? EU defenses is a joke, so much so that we need the US to guarantee help otherwise we are screwed lol.
2019-01-10 20:23
you are in the nato no ?
2019-01-11 02:27
u didnt see nato doing military exercises in the scandinavians countries ?
2019-01-11 02:27
#195
 | 
Denmark Xipingu 
We are, and yes. But have you heard the armies China for example is controlling? I do believe they have more soldiers now than the US. Russia also have a pretty large army, albeit I can’t recall if it’s bigger than the US. But nato doesn’t have the biggest one at all, and we are multiple countries.
2019-01-11 07:02
Russia has been fighting against Ukraine since 2014 and still the same positions. TerroRussian army is overrated af.
2019-01-11 12:11
#215
 | 
Denmark Xipingu 
Haha, I guess that’s true. :)
2019-01-11 18:01
xd its not about soldiers its about nuke intel and technology
2019-01-11 15:14
#214
 | 
Denmark Xipingu 
There is no profit in nuking anyone since it would result in the demise of humanity. And it’s all about profit.
2019-01-11 18:00
true facts
2019-01-10 10:38
#133
 | 
Russia og_loc 
Russia is gonna get nuked the first seconds of the war. how tf is it gonna take over anything?))
2019-01-10 11:19
#171
 | 
Denmark Xipingu 
How do you come to that conclusion? I can assure you Russia won’t get nuked first thing.
2019-01-10 20:24
#188
 | 
Russia og_loc 
Why?) Clearly ww3 could start only between USA and russia and clearly the main weapon used would be nukes
2019-01-10 23:33
#194
 | 
Denmark Xipingu 
There is no profit in nukes. Come on lol. What will destroy us eventually will be ressources perishing, not nukes.
2019-01-11 07:00
#134
 | 
Russia og_loc 
And why would it even if it could?
2019-01-10 11:20
#172
 | 
Denmark Xipingu 
Simple. Denmark is in a perfect transition position to access both Germany, England and more from another position than the one waterway north of Denmark. It’s strategically smart to have multiple points of attack. It’s a standard tactic, sure, but it works.
2019-01-10 20:26
#246
 | 
Denmark Twick_ 
We would ally with Britain, Germany and France and we would take over the whole of Scandinavia, make a peace treat with Russia and they get Finland and we get the rest
2019-01-15 14:44
#258
 | 
Denmark Xipingu 
Rip Finland xD
2019-01-15 17:05
#260
 | 
Denmark Twick_ 
We are doing them a favor, they have also wanted to be part of russia
2019-01-15 17:16
#267
 | 
Denmark Xipingu 
Seriously? That’s just dumb of them.
2019-01-15 18:12
#272
 | 
Denmark Twick_ 
I like to think that they want to be with the Russians :)
2019-01-15 21:10
Hope we are gonna take our lands back like Wilno and Lwow.
2019-01-09 18:56
Hope we take our lands back like Danzig and Schlesien xd
2019-01-10 10:18
+1
2019-01-10 11:41
+1 im from Gdansk, im halb deusch
2019-01-10 16:50
nice
2019-01-10 21:36
#255
 | 
Poland Hanse 
This moment when even poles would like to be anexed back by germans lmao Yeah I'm 1/4 german from Silesia don't kill me please
2019-01-15 16:55
i won't kill you xdee i was joking when i said that because there are way too many border shifts in european history to actually give anyone land back. would only cause trouble...
2019-01-15 22:33
Breslau tho dude
2019-01-11 15:18
Yes
2019-01-13 17:22
#16
God | 
United States Trik 
USA will win as always
2019-01-09 18:59
unless you fight against rice farmers
2019-01-09 19:02
#27
 | 
United States kearCS 
Pretty sure we would've won that war if it weren't for the political bullshit happening at the time. We were winning the war tactically, but losing politically.
2019-01-09 19:05
losing 58k people to farmers says a lot about your tactical approach
2019-01-09 19:07
#38
 | 
United States kearCS 
How bout you look at how many men the Vietcong and Vietminh lost compared to us. Stay neutral.
2019-01-09 19:12
Does it matter? You still lost the war lol
2019-01-09 19:13
#46
 | 
United States kearCS 
True, I'm not denying that fact, just saying it wasn't because of tactics, was because of politics and media.
2019-01-09 19:14
yea its true u guys lost cause of the fake news its dangerous sh*t j
2019-01-10 10:39
#43
 | 
Sweden Cruxor 
Lmao loosing 58k vs Vietnam 1m dead is a pretty good ratio.
2019-01-09 19:13
armored vehicles and napalm vs. farmers with pickaxes and still losing 58k OMEGALUL
2019-01-09 19:14
#58
 | 
United States kearCS 
They had advantage in terms of environment since we were not used to the jungle like conditions. They were given weapons from the Soviet Union, so they had mortars, solid weaponry, and many hidden traps that were nearly impossible to find. They also had men who were fighting to defend their country from invasion, not just ordered around by one man, they were fighting a cause they believed in. Still know nothing, Swiss neutrality at its finest.
2019-01-09 19:31
#60
 | 
Denmark EU_LOVER69 
LOSING TO RICE FARMERS OMEGALUL
2019-01-09 19:58
#65
 | 
United States kearCS 
You guys gave up your country to Germany almost instantly, Danish military OMEGALUL
2019-01-09 20:08
#68
 | 
Denmark EU_LOVER69 
Its called SMART
2019-01-09 20:18
its called giving up at the first hurdle dont try and be that biased
2019-01-10 05:47
#98
device | 
Denmark CaraX_ 
It's called not getting our entire fucking country bombed/nuked by a country 8 times bigger than us. Edit: Germany literally had over 3 times as many soldiers as we had population
2019-01-10 09:21
OOOOF
2019-01-10 10:40
tell that to finland
2019-01-10 11:27
:DD
2019-01-10 20:47
its called giving up at the first hurdle dont try and be that biased
2019-01-10 20:03
That "swiss" guy is a fakeflagger no lifer who usually hates Brazil and USA. He's a germanistan fakeflagger dickrider of Merkel tho, don't worry, just another stupid arab.
2019-01-10 05:38
#247
 | 
Denmark Twick_ 
Underrated comment
2019-01-15 14:44
whole world will be nuked, whoever has the best defense system wins Xd
2019-01-10 20:32
#177
God | 
United States Trik 
Europe would be completely and utterly destroyed. America would win, but at a terrible cost of life.
2019-01-10 20:35
Our country would get nuked/bombed hard, nearly half of this country would get destroyed along with our population going from 329 Million, to probably less than 160 mill.
2019-01-10 20:47
#186
God | 
United States Trik 
As I stated previously “at a terrible cost of life”. We would still win
2019-01-10 20:55
Probably Poland will participate even though it should fucking sit quiet and mind its own business
2019-01-09 19:00
it is almost impossible for poland xD
2019-01-09 20:10
#19
 | 
Germany liddeb0b 
blitzkrieg /close thread
2019-01-09 19:00
flag checks out
2019-01-10 03:08
Blitzkrieg to Paris in less than a week
2019-01-10 11:41
We should unite our forces with other baltic states and Poland, Hungary etc. to fight for white europe, but Latvia by itself is extremely weak... so idk
2019-01-09 19:00
#21
LUq | 
Poland Kurpiszyn 
World would get deleted so doesn't matter
2019-01-09 19:02
#23
 | 
Sweden Cruxor 
Together with Norway, Denmark and Finland form a long defensive line at Finnish-Russian border. Try to form a naval blockade around Kalingrad and Sankt-Petersburg for long enough time until Nato fucks Russia.
2019-01-09 19:02
russians will get raped when they come to Mannerheim line
2019-01-09 19:17
I agree, united scandinavian military to fuck Russia, Turkey, India and China Ez Win (With help from US and Eu ofc)
2019-01-10 03:14
I'm afraid in this day and age you will be just ants walking around the elephant. Useless.
2019-01-10 09:22
#124
 | 
Sweden Cruxor 
Lol, I didn't say that we were gonna attack Russia, together our 4 countries can actually create a formidable defense if given some time to prepare. And it is not like Russia would focus its forces on your borders, they have the entire eastern Europe as frontline as well.
2019-01-10 10:58
Unless we've built the wall of nukes it will be a matter of time until they reset their focus on us, we're not a tough opposition in any way, we spent too much time on making living conditions good.
2019-01-10 10:59
good idea, until were nuked the fuck out of the world really 3WW would be end of world ;( Thats a wery sad, 50 Likes?
2019-01-10 10:42
neutral af lmao
2019-01-09 19:03
Ikr russia, eu, usa nuking each other and we just chilling while eating sopa de macaco
2019-01-15 14:39
#26
 | 
United States biggay420 
nuke switzerland, take their resources. you're not sitting this one out you swiss pussys
2019-01-09 19:05
that would be a big surprise since everyone wants to go to switzerland if war breaks out.
2019-01-09 20:48
Sure go ahead. We got enough bunkers for the hole population. And nice nuke wasted. Get ready for the russians bombarding u
2019-01-15 17:36
#277
 | 
United Kingdom TGR4 
>Nuke >Take Resources Pick one
2019-01-16 00:06
#278
 | 
United States biggay420 
if we nuke one or two swiss cities they'll be sucking our fat american cocks by the end of the day. don't have to nuke the whole country, just have to send a clear message who's more powerful.
2019-01-16 02:39
WW3 has started the war of human consciousness.
2019-01-09 19:06
Spiritual warfare is WW3 Nobody will start a nuke war, unless they want to die also.
2019-01-11 00:03
#30
 | 
United Kingdom wellhyper 
Well......assuming some dopey muppet decided to launch some nukes, we'd no doubt fire some back from scotland aswell as the trident submarines that can't be hit. World would be reduced to a barren nuclear wasteland in a matter of weeks. The important/rich people will just go in their bunkers and sit it out while the rest of us common folk die from nuclear fallout.
2019-01-09 19:06
do you think ww3 without nukes is impossible?
2019-01-09 19:13
#49
 | 
Sweden Cruxor 
Ofc it is impossible, as soon as either USA + allies or Russia + allies start loosing, they will launch all their nukes out of desperation.
2019-01-09 19:15
#72
 | 
United Kingdom wellhyper 
I just can't see it happening. Plenty of wars have been lost and countries have come back from it, I just doubt a "world war" in the 21st century would *ever* get to the point where nukes would be the only option. Nukes are utterly pointless, why even have them? When argentina invaded the falklands in the 80s did we nuke them? No, would they have invaded...or better still "tried" to invade the UK mainland? No, because of the same reasons.
2019-01-10 02:49
#96
 | 
Sweden Cruxor 
Well, that's because it was a territorial conflict over some small island, nukes doesn't fit that kind of conflict. I seriously, however, doubt there will ever be a ww3 in the 21st century. But you can't deny the fact that if, let's say Moscow and Putin is hours from being captured by allied forces, what is stopping him from starting to launch nukes just to save his own life?
2019-01-10 09:09
#219
 | 
United Kingdom wellhyper 
Well I'm prety sure if moscow was "hours" from being taken then their nuclear capability was already neutralised. But irrespective of that, why would allied forces be invading russia? Even if that did happen, I doubt the people of russia would want them to launch nukes given that they'd receive more in return. They'd be signing their own death warrant, "Oh well, if were gonna lose we might aswell just die" No, that isn't a likely scenario at all.
2019-01-13 05:17
Poland and Russia would ally, Poland annex lwow and surrounding territory, Russia annex rest of Ukraine. Poland take back Vilnius and surrounding area and Russia expands deep into Lithuania. Russia consider giving Kaliningrad, Voldino and all surrounding territory to Poland but will take all military equipment stored there. Poland to take past belarus land and Russia annex rest of belarus. Kazahstan, Mongolia and Russia form the "New Soviet Nations".
2019-01-09 19:10
I don't about russia. you are kinda fucked up. both germany and russia wants poland. you can't trust either of them xD
2019-01-09 19:11
Russia doesn't want Poland. Poland used to have so many ukraine / belarus states which Russia wanted, which they got after ww2. Poland has more past German states now. Russia wants Ukraine. If Ukraine start war with Russia, Poland will automatically annex Lwow which Poland used to have before ww2
2019-01-09 19:13
You should look NATO up. god damn ignorance <3
2019-01-10 03:17
No lol. Waiting for you to link outdated 2014 sources :DDDD stop living in the past. You can't go to wikipedia, see some outdated news and say yep. poland and russia hate each other
2019-01-10 03:19
I'm not saying they hate eachother my friend. but currently Eu coalition troops are still drilling and stationed in Poland to act as a shield towards Russia and their expansions after their crimea annex.
2019-01-10 03:20
You are delusional... Poland are currently in a diplomatic stress vs Russia. They are being penetrated slowly by Putin lele get rekd polak
2019-01-10 03:16
No? lol
2019-01-10 03:17
Sorry i was wrong, Eu have since 2016 been enforcing poland to create a front vs Russia
2019-01-10 03:18
Great scenario!
2019-01-10 09:24
s1mple would 1 tap everyone so Ukraine survives with 0 casualties
2019-01-09 19:12
Russia would fuck you but if seized rushes s1mple's crosshair there is no chance
2019-01-09 19:14
meh s1mple can hold the angle for eternity like ecovice has been doing over 2018 and killing russians 1 by 1
2019-01-09 19:17
#146
 | 
Spain VIKTORAL 
lucky dudes.... i wish we had a s1mple...
2019-01-10 11:41
Dont worry I wont start anything my friend
2019-01-09 19:13
#53
fer | 
Brazil Drezim1 
neutral but cheering to Russia rekt germans again
2019-01-09 19:18
#63
 | 
Denmark EU_LOVER69 
cheering for russian LUL they dont even have money for war
2019-01-09 19:59
Understimating them only makes them stronger.
2019-01-10 09:25
but also have 0 debts 10.6% For example France 97%
2019-01-10 10:28
Depending who against who start the war.
2019-01-09 19:19
#101
device | 
Denmark CaraX_ 
Why? Won't you just end up surrendering anyways?
2019-01-10 09:23
xd
2019-01-10 11:10
Tru
2019-01-10 20:49
Finland would destroy France LUL
2019-01-10 20:51
#55
 | 
Portugal NabasKi 
i don't think we even have nuclear weaponry, anyway it's going to be the end of the world in case it happens. usa would bomb russia then russia would backfire or vice-versa. either way in a few weeks it would all be over
2019-01-09 19:19
It will always be a place for you guys in here, we have a lot of clean water and food. (we have a lot of clear water and food, yet there is a great part of population who starves to death) So again, we have a lot of clean water and food, if you have the money for it. XD
2019-01-13 05:57
#224
 | 
Portugal NabasKi 
you're not that far from usa, where a lot of bombing would take place :P you will have more clean nukes than anything else xddd
2019-01-13 12:26
90% of our water comes from the underground, its safe from radiation, plus we are PRETTY far away from USA, just look at a map dude.
2019-01-14 18:51
#56
 | 
Germany AYEONV 
germany will win
2019-01-09 19:20
good joke lmao germany is done
2019-01-09 19:26
3rd times a charm?
2019-01-09 19:58
#103
device | 
Denmark CaraX_ 
Actually best comment I've ever seen
2019-01-10 09:24
Bosnia what ??? oh the country with 1 qm landscape and a developement from the middleage
2019-01-10 11:42
what does that mean?
2019-01-10 16:05
#261
 | 
Denmark Twick_ 
He’s roasting your country
2019-01-15 17:21
#62
 | 
Denmark EU_LOVER69 
+1
2019-01-09 19:59
like the first two times, yes
2019-01-10 05:43
As funny as it sounds, but France and Britain, while technically winning the war, lost an incredible amount of power and influence. Germany on the other hand gained some.
2019-01-10 11:15
ww3 is most likely happen if pakistan use tactical nukes against us n china will back pakistan n usa will back us . since both india n china have no 1st use policy so there wont be any nukes b/w china n india but most of pakistan will get fucked n some part of india will also suffer , however war between china n usa+india will drag very long (as both india n usa will cut supply of china from indian n pacific ocean ) . russia's move also matter as India n russia are old war friend but china n russia are also friends
2019-01-09 20:04
Not if Imran has any power when it happens.
2019-01-10 09:30
In Pakistan army has control over govt so its a likely scenario
2019-01-10 13:47
I wouldn’t know. I would be sent to the army straight away and I would die 1 week into the war.
2019-01-09 20:09
i'll be hitting straight to front lines aswell, can't wait for it. I would drag the fucker who commanded all the Finns to war to come join me in the front line and show me how its done or i shoot him in his dick, war over for finns )
2019-01-10 11:36
USA: help us, we will give you money brazil: oh okay but i hope BRICs became a military alliance
2019-01-09 20:52
Unlikely scenario as India n China are big military powers but rival's also. Even if there is a chance ,USA won't let it happen .If BRICKS become military alliance , Nato will suck ass
2019-01-10 13:50
Nobody wants to start WW3 since it's just unprofitable
2019-01-09 20:52
+1
2019-01-10 03:21
War can actually be good for business
2019-01-10 05:44
#262
 | 
Denmark Twick_ 
And the people
2019-01-15 17:21
We´re getting nuked tf out of by Russia... We should look to gain a way forward frontline into russian territory or maybe fall back immediatly to get russian front onto our territory, so they won´t nuke us. But it´s best to gain as much russian territory as possible, to minimize the chance of them using there nukes at all and by getting on their territory, they wont use their nukes to stop us, for not wanting to destroy their own country
2019-01-10 03:04
Germany and Russia are actually becoming closer together. Believe it or not Germany and Russians are a lot more connected together than Germans are to USA. Russia is geographically closer and they have historical ties. Polling in the SPD and AFD say that USA is more of a danger to world peace than Russia. Look for Russia, Germany, and the EU to closer ties where Russia would provide security and gas to Europe and look for USA and the EU to come farther apart
2019-01-10 03:48
Well, you can´t really take AfD serious at all, and the fact the USA seems like a biger threat to world peace is probly your president atm... under Obama, the ties between Germany and USA have been really good, but Trump seems to sabotage everything Obama did good... And the gas thing is not so much about tying yourself more to Russia, but becoming more independent in this regard.
2019-01-10 12:58
#84
 | 
Europe Galize 
well if that happen everyone know russia will take countries like poland as much as they can in the other hand france germany italy spain portugal and UK will try to rekt russia before they move (but it will be too late russia already move) BUT USa are here too and i think they will start by taking Canada then mexico brasil argentina ect... at the end it will be 2 block (east and west AGAIN) if they can't find common interest everyone will fight they will take 18+ people to fight and they will launch nuclear bomb and at the end everyone die P.S: no i don't forget China because they will fight with russia and Russia will probably be taking down so China will fight with EU to take down USA Sorry late night post don't make really sense Sorry i'm tired Good night
2019-01-10 03:40
#150
 | 
Spain VIKTORAL 
lmao i got confused rly hard xd
2019-01-10 11:45
#162
 | 
Europe Galize 
me too when i read it now xD
2019-01-10 15:53
USA carries allies ez for usa then we get a bunch of european immigrants ez clap
2019-01-10 03:45
I mean any country can have a huge war without a huge damage to the Earth except of USA and Russia. As long as them not fight, Earth is pretty safe NB! There will be no war between these two
2019-01-10 03:51
Even france can terraform EU in a parking. GB got nuke too China pakistan india northK iran and probably others so no, earth not pretty safe
2019-01-10 09:47
#94
 | 
Turkey Ez_4_Godstyle 
Probably turkey will be w russia china and iran.. then nuked by usa.
2019-01-10 05:50
I'd probably mov further north...
2019-01-10 06:27
#99
 | 
Turkey anliyorum 
I think if it happens it will be the shortest war ever cuz of nuclear energy.
2019-01-10 09:19
Ally with Russia and fight for the justice and let the judgement be with punishment coming soon after.
2019-01-10 09:26
#111
 | 
Romania hiei59 
Will change sides close to the end of the war so that will be on the winning side. That's what we did in the first 2 wars....
2019-01-10 09:54
#116
 | 
Turkey tastemycobra 
ww3 already happened/is happening in the middle east through proxies. instead of directly battling, countries create/use terror organizations for their interests. so it is happening right before our eyes but we cannot see it.
2019-01-10 10:28
+1
2019-01-10 11:13
well, its not the ww3 they want it to be that will go down in history books. and also i dont think that ww3 will ever happened after ww2 they got everything they wanted a central bank controlled money system.
2019-01-10 11:27
#143
 | 
Turkey tastemycobra 
since the iraq invasion around 2 million people died. only in syria about 500k died. west involvement in middle east was ainly aiming at stopping russia emerge as a superpower again. and that has been unsuccessful. russia still is active in the middle east and increasing its political power. so, it seems as a world war to me.
2019-01-10 11:41
We won't do shit, maybe Brazil, Argentina or even USA will try to annex us. Idk what would people expect us to do
2019-01-10 10:34
smoke your weed sit back relax aint nobody is fucking with the god himself Jose Mujica
2019-01-11 12:14
He is probably going to die before ww3 but sure
2019-01-11 19:11
You know that if ppl consciously think about one thing too much it will happen at one point right? science still can't explain the mind / consciousness connection between each human. but once is proven that thoughts can become a reality.
2019-01-10 11:15
ERDOGAN VS MERKEL 2K19!!!
2019-01-10 11:16
Bring back the Emperor
2019-01-10 11:40
where is kaiser wilhelm when you need him
2019-01-10 18:35
#140
 | 
Europe Broozman 
Nothing xD
2019-01-10 11:39
Conquer france in less than 4 weeks
2019-01-10 11:39
France is your only way to survive WW3, so you better show some respect
2019-01-11 17:12
#265
 | 
Norway PeteZz 
Yah, with your 100.000 men army.. like half of guderians division. Prob no
2019-01-15 17:26
#271
 | 
Finland 4zera 
you mean they surrender in 3 days
2019-01-15 18:44
#148
 | 
Spain VIKTORAL 
it would be awesome spain is shti country no one will bother and catalans can use it to independentize ez win
2019-01-10 11:42
i expect ww3 will not last as long as ww1 or ww2 , in the presence there's too much advanced weapons and guns technologies i say it will be around 5 to 12 hour the time USA ships get the other side of the world and the enemies surrender xD
2019-01-10 11:43
Collapse
2019-01-10 13:14
I'm glad that no one mentions china we are friendly as fuck :)
2019-01-10 13:56
You'll get dragged in WW3 anyway just like us and many others.
2019-01-10 20:29
Just like u?maybe USA is the country which starts the war
2019-01-11 04:59
We wouldnt start WW3 without a proper reason. If we were to declare war, it would be over certain threats. And besides, judging from recent news in terms on tensions, WW3 would likely either start in the Middle East, Ukraine, or China over Taiwan.
2019-01-11 11:57
Stop jokeing lul. There is no such a proper reason for USA or everything can be called proper reason if u want to.
2019-01-11 17:03
You are one of the most disgusting hltv users I have seen.Are u Asian-American or immigrant like that?
2019-01-11 17:05
#159
United States nyz 
nothing, we have no enemies nor allies.
2019-01-10 14:22
no allies OMEGALUL Are you even keeping up with our politics? Do you understand Bolsonaro's ultra nationalist bowing down to the murican flag? xd no allies xd
2019-01-11 12:17
#217
United States nyz 
retard, brazil doesnt take part in any military agreement with the USA, we're just a friendly nation at best. their allies are the NATO.
2019-01-11 23:17
#161
 | 
Estonia teremartin 
ez for NATO Estonia
2019-01-10 15:15
#167
 | 
Moldova dimasz123 
annexed by Romania/Russia
2019-01-10 16:53
my country would be irrelevant so who cares
2019-01-10 20:28
Hope this country doesnt get nuked and completely destroyed. If half of the country gets destroyed from bombs then im rushing to Canada. The only good thing if that was the case is that this country would have to rebuild everything so we could add high speed rail and other things that this country could really use, we could even covert to the metric system assuming a shit ton of signs get destroyed by radiation and explosions :p
2019-01-10 20:28
USA would win in any scenario, because Stewie would keep rushing trough smokes and killing everyone. You cant win vs him
2019-01-10 20:53
and poor suomi will get annexed by Russia :>
2019-01-11 02:31
We got best Awper ever to touch the gun
2019-01-13 22:51
#196
NAF | 
United States EZIBP 
Should turtle, wipe South America out and prep for clean ups but would try to aid 3rd world Eastern Europeans and end up fucking us.
2019-01-11 07:05
show up at german border with beer ez af
2019-01-11 07:08
I think America should send a small force to take over south America, push them all in to the ocean and take their resources.
2019-01-11 12:13
it started in syria
2019-01-11 12:13
sweden will probably join nato in search for help against russia
2019-01-11 15:20
or they could try to stay neutral
2019-01-13 05:20
#211
 | 
Hungary Bonte 
our country will declar war on the whole western europe and get nuked the next day. Hopefully I won't be here by then
2019-01-11 17:07
#213
 | 
United States BLNDSPT 
My country gives out free shotguns to every citizen and the rations will be burgers 😎😎
2019-01-11 17:58
someone will overthrow justin trudeau and then revert the gender neutral change to our national anthem then we get nuked because trudeau had the nuclear missile defense codes. but it was fucking worth it
2019-01-11 23:19
I can see Brazil in 2 situations The first is how a USA Allie The Second is neutral In the first, we lost, probably Russia and China will invade us by Venezuela in second we can enrich with the war selling food
2019-01-13 05:22
In a short time, being the biggest source of clean water, abundant natural resources and a neutral country, Brazil should be a refuge for anyone able to scape the warzone and get here. In the long time, the big players will fight to invade and anex Brazil for its natural resources after the nuclear war fuck up their homelands.
2019-01-13 05:42
merge with our neighbours
2019-01-14 15:22
#238
 | 
Europe deVulse 
I'd probably join some spec op forces as im planning to and shoot some commies (assuming we would be fighting russia ofc) LUL.
2019-01-14 19:01
#264
 | 
Norway PeteZz 
Then i would hide in a mountain 1000km from the nearest big city, or you won’t survive.
2019-01-15 17:24
#268
 | 
Europe deVulse 
nuke explosions are overexaggerated, i live 30 km from capital and i'd easily survive even a 20 mt explosion, and there are only few such bombs so possibility of dying is nearly 0.
2019-01-15 18:29
#274
 | 
Norway PeteZz 
Yeah, but it won’t only be one bomb. They’ll make sure the whole city is blasted. But yeah, might survive the initial impact.
2019-01-15 23:48
Make a wall of sheep and merge with Australia
2019-01-15 14:31
I would like to chill but I guess germany is somehow involved in world wars lul
2019-01-15 14:51
we should blame germany as usual
2019-01-15 15:48
I really don't see anyone who would be interested in nuking deserts
2019-01-15 16:55
if the WW3 happened the whole earth would get bombed by nukes... WW3 is nothing similar to WW2, since USA, China, Russia, North Korea (50/50) has a nuclear weapon. So there is nothing much about our countries to do something in this case... Its all about superpower
2019-01-15 17:07
#263
 | 
Norway PeteZz 
Won’t be a WW3. Proxy wars or annihilation. S1mple AS that.
2019-01-15 17:24
#275
 | 
France Xda308 
If WW3 : 1) we launch nukes 2) then we surrender (number 2 is a joke)
2019-01-15 23:51
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.