Thread has been deleted
Last comment
NEW NUKE>OLD NUKE
North America cake1 
Do you think that the latest csgo nuke version we have now is better than the old nuke version?
2019-01-11 22:48
yes
2019-01-11 22:49
#35
 | 
Bangladesh drvken 
agree
2019-01-15 23:41
#57
 | 
Estonia teremartin 
NEW DUST2 REMAKE > OLD DUST2
2019-01-16 10:48
#59
 | 
Bangladesh drvken 
agree
2019-01-16 11:02
#60
 | 
Europe g4nl0cK 
Old d2 > new d2
2019-01-16 11:04
I'm split. I enjoyed the graphics of the older version better (As I do with many of these remakes), because I prefer the simplicity to the shooter instead of too much complex shit. I miss things like the skill jump to Marshmellow as well. I do prefer the layout changes that have been made though, especially to B site and stuff it's gotten a lot more fair since CS:GO's early days.
2019-01-11 22:53
+1
2019-01-16 07:08
No Nuke > New/Old Nuke
2019-01-11 22:57
#48
 | 
Europe The_Disabled 
+1
2019-01-16 07:28
#4
North America cake1 
New nuke more balanced than old nuke?
2019-01-12 15:09
#58
 | 
Norway Hokken 
+1+1 This nuke is actully playable t side, old nuke = 6 round t side? we've won it already
2019-01-16 10:49
Every old map is better than the new version. Shit makers ruin shit they've made.
2019-01-12 15:10
d2?
2019-01-15 13:18
#42
jks | 
Germany wh1teey 
New d2 is shit
2019-01-16 07:01
Newest overpass >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> older overpass Newest train >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> old train New mirage >>>>>>>> old mirage Previous cobble >>>>>>> old cobble Just because inferno and dust 2 were a flop doesnt mean worse maps are a norm
2019-01-15 23:19
Old cobble>>>>>new cobble
2019-01-15 23:33
I said previous cobble not new cobble
2019-01-15 23:36
Oh, I see
2019-01-15 23:39
#27
 | 
Estonia u3ffe 
Old cobble was better imo, now it is too bright at some spots and those birds driving me crazy in clutches lol
2019-01-15 23:33
Which one are u talking about
2019-01-15 23:37
#63
 | 
Estonia u3ffe 
new one has those lights and birds
2019-01-17 16:59
#52
 | 
Denmark aimingyou 
Gameplay of cobble top stale imo, once players had dropped, you would basically know what would happened. Essentially og felt played out
2019-01-16 08:16
#64
 | 
Estonia u3ffe 
I agree, not many things to do with fakes and etc, but still I think cobble wasn't the worst in the pool, devs should add something new or old to map pool like tuscan or any other good map.
2019-01-17 17:01
#69
 | 
Denmark aimingyou 
Well nuke obviously wasn't played out yet, i feel like the teams who do play it aren't too far apart. Like nip and mouz have had glose games with astralis so I think it hold become an important part og the map pool and a widely played one if teams deploy a more astralis like approach to the map
2019-01-18 14:24
#71
 | 
Estonia u3ffe 
I do agree with you, in case of nuke there is just a map itself, not many teams can play it due their personal game style, Astralis managed to set their own rules and so far it works.
2019-01-18 18:29
I think Inferno‘s turned out pretty well actually. Also you didn‘t mention Nuke, where I think the graphics are too flashy but the gameplay‘s better.
2019-01-16 07:17
Inferno is hardly a flop, it hasn't changed that dramatically. I can see why some people would prefer old inferno, but I don't understand why new inferno gets so much hate.
2019-01-16 07:27
people always call it a flop i didnt like the map before or now so i didnt want to mention it
2019-01-16 08:26
I actually really enjoy new Inferno, and can see why some people prefer old Inferno but I don't think it was a flop.
2019-01-16 07:29
i have seen people complain about it all the time
2019-01-16 08:26
#50
 | 
United States Degree|CSGO 
New inferno >>>>>>>>> old inferno New Nuke is mixed but overall it is much better New Dust 2 >>>>>>>> Old Dust 2
2019-01-16 07:37
It's only your opinion just like that was mine. You seem inexperienced to claim that as if it was a well known fact. Behave Stevie.
2019-01-16 10:43
#6
 | 
Slovakia Fabiven 
I really liked that map when there was a catwalk before the latest update but now it's just boring for me.. they reduced possibilities of jumps and unique plays.. dunno they said it's more balanced but it's less fun, can't even see that ''balance''.
2019-01-12 15:14
#20
 | 
Denmark Xipingu 
It was balanced with cat, now it’s CT-sided af again.
2019-01-15 23:10
#7
forsaken | 
Belarus c0mmi3 
1.6 nuke>all
2019-01-12 15:22
1.6 nuke is the best version all others suck cock
2019-01-12 15:24
#9
North America cake1 
No
2019-01-15 13:07
no
2019-01-15 13:07
#14
 | 
Poland MAGA2020 
1.6 + old csgo
2019-01-15 13:12
#25
 | 
Estonia u3ffe 
+ Tuscan 1.6
2019-01-15 23:32
+99999
2019-01-16 07:09
#11
 | 
Iran KouDaPou 
not gunna lie, Nuke is still an instaban on Faceit lmao
2019-01-15 13:09
+1 Kinda annoying to me since i rly like this map
2019-01-15 23:40
#12
 | 
Netherlands @Deji 
I don't like nuke anyway
2019-01-15 13:11
I like old newke with catwalk, hud window etc, now they made it so every retard can play it
2019-01-15 13:11
No one plays it sux Get cbble back for it and someother map to repoace cache
2019-01-15 13:15
But Cache is best map
2019-01-15 23:08
Ok keep it then:)
2019-01-15 23:14
It's not because you suck and you don't understand the rotations on Nuke that the map is shit you know
2019-01-15 23:41
Idc no one plays it as user i expect fun and more maps if its not played by pro teams whats the point
2019-01-16 06:56
nuke is trash who cares
2019-01-15 13:19
I would really prefer if there was no Nuke at all.
2019-01-15 13:21
#24
 | 
Estonia u3ffe 
Nukes are bad for health
2019-01-15 23:31
#23
 | 
Estonia u3ffe 
Tuscan>Nuke
2019-01-15 23:31
#38
 | 
Bangladesh drvken 
agree
2019-01-15 23:41
#62
 | 
Estonia u3ffe 
Dhan'yabāda
2019-01-17 16:59
#65
 | 
Bangladesh drvken 
r u mad?
2019-01-17 17:34
#66
 | 
Estonia u3ffe 
im nuts
2019-01-17 20:34
#68
 | 
Bangladesh drvken 
thank u
2019-01-17 20:37
They aimed to dumb down nuke and they succeeded.
2019-01-15 23:35
1.6 nuke > old nuke's textures > new nuke layout
2019-01-15 23:36
#34
 | 
United States gizzle 
no
2019-01-15 23:40
#36
 | 
United States BGS 
What can they do to make the map better?
2019-01-15 23:41
#39
 | 
United States codgun 
I think all the remakes are typically much better than the original and only get overrated by nostalgiafags and people who didn't even play the game at the time of the original. I personally have much better memories with the old ones but it's dumb to think Valve doesn't know as much as they do about the game. Even if they don't really update the game with game-changing updates consistently I really believe at least some of the dev team truly care about the game as much as we do.
2019-01-15 23:44
I ADORED the old Nuke. Easily my best and favorite map. I do not approve of the new map design, not because it is new, but because it wears my eyes off. All of the new maps do, actually. Dunno how to define, but it feels like they are forcing shaders or some shit. Though I gotta admit I still loved it (even tho i dont play anymore), since map design was actually good. However the vent changes, again, makes me pissed whenever I think of it >:(
2019-01-16 07:00
#46
xartE | 
Finland timppati 
no
2019-01-16 07:27
#51
 | 
Israel wetz 
Yes
2019-01-16 07:38
#53
 | 
Europe fahadinho 
this nuke is rly close to 1.6 one so is not too bad, but still dd2 and nuke insta ban
2019-01-16 08:18
New one is lot more exciting to play and watch since you can win rounds on t side now
2019-01-16 13:13
#67
 | 
Hungary Shiron212 
It's not bad, but still, I like the old one better
2019-01-17 20:36
#70
 | 
Spain X4rly 
The only thing i miss is the wallbangs, the idea of the nuke remake was to make it less CT side, but they removed most of the wallbangs that, in old nuke, allowed u to safely clear some CT positions that are hard to clear in other way.
2019-01-18 14:19
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.