Thread has been deleted
Last comment
device top3
 | 
Denmark sundeL1Ne 
device is next 1.25{niko} > 1.24 It's sad certainly, but now it's only a statistical rating.
2019-01-18 19:34
#1
 | 
Pakistan d1ckweed 
k.
2019-01-18 19:35
#2
 | 
Denmark oskarsports 
expected a low iq comment from an astralis fan
2019-01-18 19:35
#3
 | 
Ukraine dashbug 
Lol
2019-01-18 19:37
#4
 | 
Denmark sundeL1Ne 
I'm not a stupid fan or guy what do you think. If you look at the previous statements from the hltv, Magisk was the seventh, KRIMZ who practically didn't win anything, turned out to be higher than the best player in Brazil, as well xyp9x. Therefore, this top is exclusively based on the individual component.
2019-01-18 19:40
sory im toxik
2019-01-18 19:58
#18
smooya | 
United Kingdom fal36 
the best player in brazil who didnt win anything at all
2019-01-18 20:31
#10
 | 
Finland trashsports 
Mouz fan AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
2019-01-18 19:59
man but device won so many things to be ranked in 3
2019-01-18 19:41
#7
 | 
Denmark sundeL1Ne 
I know it certainly, but this Top now prefers more individual player abilities, how good is the rating, impact, adr it has, and so on.
2019-01-18 19:45
how can you explain flusha<device 2015?
2019-01-18 20:05
it's on to hltv, and you see the 3rd now
2019-01-18 20:07
The point I was trying to make is that it depends more on individual performance by the looks of things.
2019-01-18 20:09
I know, but I thought the stats were so close. and you know, it's not 100% stats to judge ranks NiKo won as the stats but quite close, and I think device's achievements worked a little bit to win NiKo slightly. sry for ma inglish
2019-01-18 20:21
Sure achievements play a role, but it's definitely more based on individual performance.
2019-01-18 20:28
that's what I'm saying
2019-01-18 20:38
It always been a list of personal stats actually
2019-01-18 19:45
#8
 | 
Denmark sundeL1Ne 
+1, but 2014-2016, then they preferred more rewards
2019-01-18 19:48
#12
2019-01-18 20:09
Nt
2019-01-18 20:03
#19
smooya | 
United Kingdom fal36 
do you read the reasoning for each player or do you just see that one player has a higher rating so he must be above a lower rated player?
2019-01-18 20:33
#22
 | 
Denmark sundeL1Ne 
So it was with previous players whose rating was higher, to that, too, not only rating but also adr, impact. For example Magisk Naf, electronic Although Magisk should have been higher, since according to statistics they were almost the same, but Emil had 7-9 evp and 1 MVP in stock, he was given. that's no fair
2019-01-18 23:52
#23
smooya | 
United Kingdom fal36 
Mvps and evps are not uniform units of measurement 6mvps is not always more impressive than 4mvps Its about the performance earns the mvp/evp Electronic had no mvps but his evp performances were better than other players mvp/evp performances ranked below him Pls read the article before complaining
2019-01-19 00:09
s1mple is #2
2019-01-18 20:35
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.