Thread has been deleted
Last comment
#StopToxicity
 | 
Denmark BotShrood 
twitter.com/TheNorthIsHere/status/108734.. Stop toxicity and make a better community. Everyone should read this twitter by North, which all organisations now have retweeted and agreed to.
2019-01-22 11:43
#1
God | 
Poland henlo 
toxicity is the best part of the game tho
2019-01-22 11:44
#6
 | 
Europe new_nickname 
hahahaha idk, in last year when im getting toxic players they are after 1 sec my best friends XD funny as hell to make them more agressive hahahahha
2019-01-22 11:47
#43
 | 
Brazil Pepe__ 
No it's not. if you think that a negative behaviour is normal, well I've bad news for you
2019-01-22 15:32
maybe for you
2019-01-22 16:13
#69
 | 
Netherlands poeya 
stfu toiletcleaner Edit: JK
2019-01-22 20:57
#76
God | 
Poland henlo 
if u want to insult me at least have the balls to commit to it how big of a pussy are u lmao
2019-01-23 05:55
#81
 | 
Netherlands poeya 
I dont care about you lmao I did jk to counter jonathan e ban power
2019-01-23 13:17
#78
 | 
Lithuania andy_ 
+1
2019-01-23 06:44
kill yourself (in game)
2019-01-22 11:44
#48
 | 
United States BLNDSPT 
` bind k "kill"
2019-01-22 16:16
kys (keep yourself safe :))
2019-01-22 11:46
Kids don't know the weight of their words
2019-01-22 11:46
Words are an idea, idea are made of energy, energy is weightless. You don't, but they do.
2019-01-22 11:50
e=mc^2
2019-01-22 11:57
yes?
2019-01-22 12:23
"energy equals mass times the speed of light squared" ENERGY EQUALS MASS TIMES A CONSTANT.
2019-01-22 12:34
yes so? Joules = grams time meters divided by seconds E in Joules, not grams. A more efficient way to contradict me would have been to say our idea are created by electric energy in our brain. Electricity = electrons and electrons have a mass (and so a weight). But no need to go this way either, it still doesn't contradict me.
2019-01-22 12:44
were both wrong here... kinda. mass emerges through energy. if you move an object by adding kinetic energy that object has more mass. rest mass has no kinetic energy so no additional mass is added. energy does not have weight. but energy can add weight to a rest mass. so you cant say energy is massless but you cant also say it does. hope we get on the same page now.
2019-01-22 15:06
no one here said anyting about massless. Read again. But if somehow you can explain us how you turn energy into weight, it is insta Nobel price for you, because you would have solved the quantum gravitation problem.
2019-01-22 15:16
it doesnt change my point. you would only change the reference frame. if we add gravity since were on earth the same physics will be applied only accounting the mass that is added by gravity. if i move an object here on earth it gets more mass plus the weight-mass difference it has on earth. i feel like you dont want to be on the same page. whatever. have a nice day.
2019-01-22 15:20
Look at above post, it always been about weight, not mass. weight imply gravity. Energy have no weight like it or not it is just it. I have no idea why you speak about object since your last post btw. energy != object
2019-01-22 15:24
never said this aswell wdym?
2019-01-22 15:25
gravitational energy adds mass to an object thats why you weigh less in space. no one said anything about turning energy into weight. i said if you added energy of some form of force (kinetic in this case) to an object it will have more mass.
2019-01-22 15:25
Gravitational energy (which is a wrong name since Einstein) don't add any mass omfg. You are the one replying to the weight of idea or the weight of energy. Again, no idea why you started to speak about cinetic energy and objects. Also mass (m) of an object as in E=mc² you mentioned above don't change in any case. You are speaking about is the Maupertuis's mass (Mi) which is not classical mass (m). You are talking about something you don't handle son.
2019-01-22 15:38
"You are talking about something you can't* handle son." coming from the guy who concludes that im saying object = energy from my previous post. coming from a guy who writes kinetic with C even though i typed it correctly with K multiple times. any object no matter what it is HAS energy NOT IS. which increases when you accelerate it to a constant speed. more energy = more mass. otherwise the equation would be wrong. THATS WHAT I SAID. i gave you the opportunity to interpret my comment so that you can conclude that mass is an emergent property of energy. just as the ENERGY of gravity gives it its force so weight is also an emergent property of energy. or vice versa since energy is a numerical abstraction that describes how much these component forces act on each other. going back to the original comment you cant say energy is weightless this sentence has no meaning at all. theyre fundamentally connected. weight doesnt make a difference here since its just the addition of a gravitational force to the reference frame. so in conclusion: your sentence makes no sense at all. and neither did mine originally. i changed it then to "more energy = more mass". "more gravity = more weight". you cant describe one without the other.
2019-01-22 16:12
#50
 | 
United States BLNDSPT 
hahahahahahaha topic goes from "stop being mean online" general relativity
2019-01-22 16:17
i find this quite fascinating actually.
2019-01-22 16:21
#55
 | 
United States BLNDSPT 
I do too, it just made me laugh because I was just skimming thru the comments and I see all this talk about gravity and stuff, just thought it was funny :D
2019-01-22 16:22
#77
 | 
Portugal Tooxic13 
+1
2019-01-23 06:05
No i didn't concluded you said "object = energy from my previous post." I was reminding you you were talking about something different from the post you replied to. cinetic is a french mistake, my bad indeed. But you have to be really triggered to blame me for that, my apologies. Again no, more energy doesn't add mass to an object. Again, there is no energy of the gravity. This is the base of the Einstein's general relativity. You mean Potential energy. I believe it is this mis believe that make you mess up between mass and weight. It is not because you don't understand a sentence that it has no sense. Energy has no weight, period. So again, as you try to apply Newton's mechanical principes to energy (quantum physic) you are mistaking yourself. Now take a break and if this subject interest you, then learn it.
2019-01-22 16:22
i only referred to your grammar mistakes because you took the discussion to a lower level by calling me essentially dumb. ofc im gonna point out that youre not perfect either. anyway. i just didnt like the way you put yourself on a high horse there. yes i meant potential energy i shouldve been more clear. clearly this subject interests me. and by discussing it with you i am learning it. i picked it up as a hobby but i do not have the time or the means to learn it as a profession. so i have to lower myself to wikipedia and youtube. since those sources are usually incredibly dumbed down so its very likely im misinterpretig some stuff. i dont regret anything here since im trying to gain knowledge. by standing my ground i pull the most out of you since you wpuld have to provide more arguments and insights. and that gives me a deeper understandingthan if i just sat heee and agreed with you on everything.
2019-01-22 16:41
Energy as it is the core of quantum physic and no one on earth as theory able to make consensus on it and it's interaction with gravity field. You probably heard it in your video/articles but gravity is not a force, but a distorsion of space (and time let's let this part aside). In classic mechanic we talk about potential energy, which is a manifestation of the gravity field. F=ma. Gravity is not the "F" but the "a". And our understanding of gravity stop as quantic physic kick in. That's why we have hard time to understand what is happening in singularities (like the center of black hole, or the big bang moment) and not sure why some energy seems to be able to escape black holes horizon theoretically (Hawking's Radiations), etc.. Anyway, energy has no mass. That's a basic of physic. Yet as you said, massive objects have energy. But it doesn't mean energy have a mass. In detail it become really tricky to explain, but it is the core of special relativity. more here : desy.de/user/projects/Physics/ParticleAn.. All that to say it is normal to be mistaking about that subject. I never intended to make you feel dumb or whatever. I wish more people here could have this kind of talks here. Sorry if I did. About your Kinetic/mass issue, think about the "energy" you give to an object to change its trajectory as a "force". like in F=1/2mv² so you won't mess between energy and force anymore. About mass and weight, what I was trying to tell you is : mass (m) is the quantity of matter. It never change. weight is a force : weight = mass * acceleration Gravity field create an acceleration on object (earth gravity create an acceleration of 9.8m² on its surface for instance) That's why an astronaut with always the same mass (quantity of matter) have different weight depending if he is on earth or on the moon. Anyway, all this confusing come from history. When we created weight, we had no clue it could be different from the mass so for what humanity knew most of its existence mass = weight. But today we know it is not the case anymore. Same goes for potential energy = gravity force = gravity field. But most of these rules on interaction between gravity and particules doesn't work in quantum physics, where energy can be described. And the day someone comes with a satisfying enough theory on that, he will get the Nobel price directly. Have a nice day.
2019-01-22 17:19
thanks for not abandoning the discussion and taking the time to clarify some stuff. have a nice day too.
2019-01-22 20:55
You can't change an objects mass by moving it, might want to revisit the definition of mass there aye :-)
2019-01-22 16:17
the rest mass doesnt increase. yes.
2019-01-22 16:24
You're using mass in place of weight in your above comments. Weight is mass*acceleration. Mass does not change depending on the location of the object.
2019-01-22 16:27
#5
 | 
Germany Vinylshark 
>promote betting >people get butthurt af, cause they lose their bets >North: pikachusuprisememe.jpg
2019-01-22 11:47
#8
 | 
Czech Republic PaYaB 
+1
2019-01-22 11:48
#29
NiKo | 
United Kingdom lr1015 
literally have to promote gambling so they can survive as an org lmao
2019-01-22 15:08
Then don't act surprise when it bites you in the ass
2019-01-22 15:12
#33
NiKo | 
United Kingdom lr1015 
Yeah I don't gamble tho lmao
2019-01-22 15:20
I was referring to North. If you want to promote gambling, be prepared for the repercussions
2019-01-22 15:24
#37
NiKo | 
United Kingdom lr1015 
i mean, literally all big tournaments promote gambling, even majors, but eh
2019-01-22 15:24
Well they should be prepared for the very likely scenario that they create more gambling addicts.
2019-01-22 15:25
thought they were backed by some major football team????????? (I'm not into football so I wouldn't know really) they're still scumbags either way not to mention that this type of shit is never going to stop regardless, even better is that the absolute majority of the community condemns/makes fun of the people who say dumb shit like that (even the idiots on hltv condemn this behaviour) it's just fucking stupid to blame the community for these things (as bad as the community may be)
2019-01-22 15:25
#62
 | 
Brazil soubarney 
Shit. That's so true. And they gotta do it to survive as an org. At the cost of a stupid gambling addict being aggressive at them. But if they didn't create new stupid gambling addicts, they wouldn't have the gambling money to pay the bills. Shitty scenario.
2019-01-22 16:28
Agreed. This isn't okay. Sending messages telling people to "Go die" or to "End themselves" should not be acceptable.
2019-01-22 11:47
Cry me a river weak piece of shit org, disband already and go be soft somewhere else
2019-01-22 11:52
#11
 | 
Brazil baldok1 
conversion software version 7.0
2019-01-22 11:53
Toxicity rate drops to 0%
2019-01-22 11:54
#13
 | 
Brazil LuanLCgCabral 
#PAS
2019-01-22 11:56
this is not even toxicity, this is something else I am fine with toxicity in-game but not this
2019-01-22 11:59
#16
 | 
Denmark dR_JaCkPoT 
cheap PR stunt from North to gain popularity and exposure... like they care if some no lifers writes that in their facebook chat lol...
2019-01-22 12:01
#19
 | 
Brazil kaiknux 
so now you can't do anything without getting labeled as exposure whore
2019-01-22 12:17
Yeah i really don't see the "PR stunt" in this, ofcourse it gains attention but that's because all the other orgs are supporting North.
2019-01-22 12:37
#17
Sweden Sp22 
Kids dont understands the power in words. Most of comments are likely kids without brain. And a few ppl who lost money betting.. pathetic ones
2019-01-22 12:15
#18
loli | 
Russia AnimeTrap 
Everyone tend to be edge lords nowadays...
2019-01-22 12:17
#20
ScreaM | 
Brazil HLTVolt 
Just a question, how many of them are brazilians?
2019-01-22 12:20
#73
 | 
Sweden DrakenIsHot 
All of them?
2019-01-22 22:19
#21
 | 
Denmark Holymoomoo 
Just disband that shitty team
2019-01-22 12:20
#79
 | 
Lithuania andy_ 
+1
2019-01-23 06:45
just make all betting sites ask for verification before placing bets and that's it cuz on trash sites like GG.SHIT any kid can deposit and bet without any documents ofc they lose money and cry
2019-01-22 12:32
Meanwhile.. they are sponsored by a betting site.. basically that is promoting it. And when Valve closed some betting sites and made the 7 trade ban, remember how EVEN pros got (not all but many i remember)? calling Valve out, saying skins made the game, etc, etc.. Hypocrites. But yeah, threats and all kind of stupid words are not worth the time to even read it.
2019-01-22 12:36
It's not just people that bet though. It's such a big part of the community which is just insane.
2019-01-22 15:10
#80
 | 
Lithuania andy_ 
Good point
2019-01-23 06:45
#42
 | 
Norway PeteZz 
FU! Forever Unified* <3
2019-01-22 15:26
#47
Twistzz | 
Russia Roneee 
#StopToxicity Pepega
2019-01-22 16:14
GET A CANCER PLEASE NOOBS
2019-01-22 16:18
That's uncalled for.
2019-01-22 16:30
I agree, these kind of words didn't help in any factor of the game, just make you have a worse experience.
2019-01-22 16:19
#54
 | 
United States BLNDSPT 
cool thread thx north <3
2019-01-22 16:21
The funny thing of this thread,the advice coming from Danes who has most toxic people in the world lmao
2019-01-22 16:24
#72
 | 
Denmark BotShrood 
I think you've been very unlucky. Toxic people exist in every country, just as there are cold blooded murderers even in the wealthiest countries. Sorry to hear about your bad experience with Danish people
2019-01-22 22:01
100% Toxicity should be denied, restricted and strictly punished. CSGO community is full of hatred people. I would ban them permanently. They are not better than cheaters.
2019-01-22 16:28
Gaming community**
2019-01-22 16:31
xaxaxaxaxa
2019-01-22 16:28
#70
 | 
Portugal Antzrede 
+1
2019-01-22 21:00
#SupportToxicity
2019-01-22 21:02
expected from gavrilo princip
2019-01-22 22:22
toxicity has nothing to do with a community, its in humanity general on the rise right now, cuz its easier to be sad and depressed than happy and value smaller things.
2019-01-22 22:23
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.