Major grand final should be Bo5, should be the only event with Bo5.
Every stage desrves something else.
Also ur name is wrong coz simple don't need Zeus he can use Ak,Awp,M4 so no zeus required why stun when u can gun
BO7 is only worth for IBuyPower
In finals BO5>BO3>BO7>BO1
bo9 is best. we need cbble and tuscan.
Black Ops 1 > Black ops 2 > others (i didnt even buy the rest LUL)
i will say :
bo3 >bo5 >bo1
bo3 is always the best way to see who is a better team
bo5 is for teams that are in a close level , but both have a big mappool.
bo1 is for lucky teams that have a small mappool
bo5 just betten on finals
first to 10 rounds on office wins the tournament
Major final split in to 2 days BO7
BO5 Major final
BO3 3rd place decider for Major
Majors should be real Majors not a random tourney
BO5 too long for major final coz cant put in retarded showmatch so rip
I Haven't seen any bo7 matches
-bo2 for groupstages, i dont mind draws, both teams get their map pick.
-bo3 for playoff games or small tourney finals, overall the best format.
-bo5 for grand finals. Wide mappool should be rewarded and it feels more prestigious to have long final. Problem is that the finals can be too long so it needs to be a highly valued tournament.
bo1 shouldn't even be played competitively.
bo7 shouldn't be either, players would be exhausted and crowd disinterested. I do like the idea that you cant permaban a map though. Maybe pick-ban-pick-leftower could work on bo5 ?
bo3 is perfect for good teams in csgo
bo5 is perfect for good teams in dota (sometimes u wish bo7 cus its so awesome)
bo3 in league cus its so boring
bo1 sucks in all games honestly, doesn't determine which is the better team in any way since theres so much rng
I think one knife round is enough
it's a statistical fact that the more often you repeat an experiment, the more accurate the end result.
for ex, 1 coinflip will give you a 100/0 distribution, but the more flips you make, the closer you'll get to 50/50.
that's why we play 30 rounds per map, instead of just 2.
so in that regard more maps is objectively better at finding the better team.
now we have to factor in exhaustion. playing all 7 maps takes too long, you'd have to add long pauses in the middle of the series for all players to be in top shape - or have them all hooked on sugar and caffein the whole time :D
but if both teams play no other matches that day, a bo5 is always doable and should be preferred.
now we factor in scheduling for the TO. if 2 streams are used, each stream could show 2 bo5, or 1 bo5 and 2 bo3, or 3 bo3 per day.
so, realistically, you could play a 16 team double elim bracket with bo5 in the winners bracket from round 2 on, the rest bo3, all in 7 days without anyone playing more and 1 bo5 or 2 bo3 per day.
Best of 9, gotta show 100% mastery on all maps
bo7 < bo1 < bo5 < bo3 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< bo0
bo5 is draining, i remember tarik said about boston major which is bo3. it was so though that they cant really think about anything, they just do things as fast as they can to win
BO3 random workshop maps. Gonna be great seeing who can play some kids poorly built hide and seek map with not textures.
agree, bo5 during toyota bangkok was boring af, basically a bo3 but drawn longer than needed
When did a bo7 final even happened on CS. All maps with the chance to be played.
B05 would be best if no overtime, so ez to think, but people complicates it
I think Black Ops 1 was the best, but that's just me.
Regular LAN Bo3
I prefer: 3 5 1 7
bo5 for major finals, definitely.
bo3 anything else
How about a bo3 of bo3s? 3 bo3s so after the first teams can alter the veto to get different maps or play the same map again a different way
BO3 > BO5 > BO1 > BO7
btw i never saw bo7 in my life
BO21 > everything else
team plays every map 3x
Just get rid of Overtimes.
Win is 3 points. Tie is 1 point.
Get 5+ points to win the game.
Bo5 is so boring to watch and the quality if cs just gets so low by the 4th and 5th map.
Bo5 can literally last 8 hours, most people dont have time to eatch an 8 hour match. Bo3s on the other wont go over 4 hours.
a bo7 spanning a couple of days would be kinda sick actually
bo7 is for boring people like you
they need an entire tournament thats bo5 every game except final bo7.
+1 hardly anyone would watch a full BO5 final .
I hate Bo1’s because they are so random sometimes. Bo7’s shouldn’t ever happen in CS tbh.
Bo3’s all the way.
BO7?! wtf its like one day game
bo5 > bo1
but bo3 all the way
Not quite sure why people want bo5 finals?
Only few teams are able to play 5 maps, people get tired during the games, crowd falls as sleep
BO5(should be major finals only)>BO3>BO1>BO7
has there ever been an official bo7 cuz i've never seen one
BO7 tournament, 3 teams, playing for entire week single map each. 3 matches per day for all 3 teams to play 3 games on same map against each other. Each victory 1 point.
if its an really important game, ill watch a b03 from start to finish
The problem with bo5 is that assuming that if it goes all 5 maps, and each map last about an hour, it will take 5 hours to decide who's the winner of the match, and that is not including overtime. This is a problem if the match starts like around 10pm for the viewers (me because I live in Singapore, so a few hours faster than where europeans tournaments are held, and they start usually at around 5pm there), and if I have to be awake up to 2am AT LEAST just to watch who win the match, I rather sleep.
This is why I like bo3 the most, it is the perfect balance between showing which team is the best in the world, and shortening the time it takes to decide the winner.