Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Political Ideology
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
What political ideology do you identify with?
2019-02-07 21:43
#1
 | 
Serbia 2KGkaka 
sorry Trik, won't fall into your traps
2019-02-07 21:43
Unemployment is tough brah...
2019-02-13 21:41
#2
 | 
Germany GoBIG0rGoHome 
Liberalism
2019-02-07 21:44
xaxaxa libtard
2019-02-09 12:01
#267
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
l00000l
2019-02-13 17:30
#285
 | 
Israel soprendo 
You realize that liberalism has nothing to do with the democratic party?
2019-02-13 21:49
#288
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
Liberalism gets confused a lot, if he meant classical liberalism, fine. But if it’s modern liberalism...
2019-02-13 21:51
#300
 | 
Israel soprendo 
The meaning of liberalism has been misconstrued, so they made a new word that has the original meaning - libertarianism.
2019-02-13 21:55
#321
 | 
Sweden chainylol 
libertarianism is fucking retarded, change my mind
2019-02-20 18:34
#326
 | 
Israel soprendo 
If you're talking about 100% libertarian, where everything is privatized then yes it's retarded. However you need to have some libertarian views otherwise you become authoritarian.
2019-02-20 18:41
i am a librarianist
2019-02-20 18:37
xaxaxaxaxa nt LIBtard
2019-02-13 21:55
#MeToo!! I love liberalism.
2019-02-13 21:42
allowed to say that as chinese men or you get fucked in your point system now? :D
2019-02-13 21:44
Triggered already? How is Merkel btw? lmfao
2019-02-13 21:48
not saying its 100% bad tho shes the best chancellor possible atm and does her job especially internationally well
2019-02-13 21:48
stfu trik
2019-02-07 21:45
+1
2019-02-07 21:46
+1
2019-02-08 00:25
#203
 | 
Palestine Baitor69 
-3
2019-02-08 01:04
#4
 | 
Europe Pini_ 
Communism, without a doubt
2019-02-07 21:45
#8
 | 
Brazil eoteamo 
+1
2019-02-07 21:48
#11
 | 
Finland trashsports 
You re retarded then
2019-02-07 21:51
#14
 | 
Europe Pini_ 
Try explaining why im retarded
2019-02-07 21:57
#23
 | 
Finland trashsports 
Look at North Korea and you will understand that communism is absolutely dead
2019-02-07 22:03
#36
 | 
Europe Pini_ 
North Korea ist really a country I really support but anyway. Although most of what we hear about them is comunist popaganda, they do some fucked up stuff. However, not really liking ONE "communist" state doesnt make communism a bad thing, so keep telling me the flaws you see on communism itself
2019-02-07 22:15
#39
 | 
Finland trashsports 
USSR, North Korea, Western Europe in 19xx, Cuba, Venezuela are not enough for you?
2019-02-07 22:17
#42
 | 
Europe Pini_ 
The USSR transitioned from being a really poor, agrarial country to being one of the worlds most powerful states. Cuba, despite not having many resources has erradicated child hunger, has one of america's best health sistems and homelessness is not an issue
2019-02-07 22:20
Venezuela is still 80% capitalist lol
2019-02-07 22:47
It is very difficult to make a decent Communist nation when the whole world is capitalist. From the moment the nation proclaims itself socialist, it suffers retaliation from the entire world.
2019-02-07 23:41
#194
 | 
United States pSilent 
No, Communism suffers under the weight of its own impractical ideals, one of which always brings it into conflict with nations that aren't Capitalist.
2019-02-08 00:29
Examples?
2019-02-08 00:31
#197
 | 
United States pSilent 
One of Communism's main principles is the elimination of Nationalism world-wide. This is because Communism seeks to equalize social classes and revolve society around community rather than national identity. Every Western nation nowadays is heavily influenced by Nationalism. This is why Communistic nations both treat other nations that aren't communist with aggression and get treated with aggression in turn.
2019-02-08 00:35
Venezuela has been aggressive with whom to suffer the retaliations that are suffering? Simply by denying the sale of their national treasure, which are the oil holdings, they suffer strong embargoes from the capitalist countries. And Cuba? What is their threat? The last time Cuba was a threat was in the missile war when it was influenced by the USSR. Even so to this day it suffers retaliations simply by its model of government.
2019-02-08 00:48
#200
 | 
United States pSilent 
Venezuela isn't Communist, and is suffering for reasons not related to Communism at all. You literally just said why Cuba is suffering. Perhaps if they endeavored to act less antagonistic to Western nations they wouldn't be in the situation they're in.
2019-02-08 00:57
Venezuela is not communist, but communist groups there were growing spontaneously, probably in the rhythm that was going to turn into a socialism. If it is only because of the war of the missiles the problem, why other countries that were also threat do not suffer anything nowadays? I am sure that if Cuba were to become a capitalist country, all this would disappear. This is a clear ideological war.
2019-02-08 01:05
#210
 | 
United States pSilent 
" If it is only because of the war of the missiles the problem, why other countries that were also threat do not suffer anything nowadays?" Because they made a concerted effort to sever ties with the USSR, the greatest threat to Western civilization at its peak, and re-establish negotiations with Western civilization? Cuba didn't do any of that. " I am sure that if Cuba were to become a capitalist country, all this would disappear." Not true necessarily. Things are improving between Cuba and other nations, however with the rise of more isolationist governments in the West things are looking downhill.
2019-02-08 01:11
Do you think Cuba would not like to reestablish negotiations with the West? They can not even import iron because of the embargoes they suffer. They were able to advance in the negotiations thanks to the small opening they made to capitalism. Today there are private companies in Cuba because of that.
2019-02-08 01:52
#214
 | 
United States pSilent 
Yes, at least their government didn't want to until recently. Castro simply did not like the US, and not making nice with the US is not making nice with the West in general. Once Castro stepped down, like I said, things have been improving, but it's generally too late for them.
2019-02-08 01:54
#262
 | 
Europe Pini_ 
"Castro didnt liie the US" It's not like tye US made 638 assasination attemps onnCastro, isn't it?
2019-02-13 17:26
Eastern Europe
2019-02-08 01:54
North Korea isn't communist.
2019-02-07 22:46
According to this logic, liberalism should be dismissed by Somalia.
2019-02-07 22:47
#12
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
lmao someone didn’t pay attention in history class
2019-02-07 21:51
#13
 | 
Europe Pini_ 
Nah, it's because I did pay atention
2019-02-07 21:57
#19
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
So, you’re forgetting the tens of millions of people who perished under totalitarianist communist regimes? You’re forgetting the people who were purposely starved from an engineered famine called the holodomor? Which led to the deaths of 7 million people in the Ukraine? People were starving to death which in turn led to many of them eating eachother, and their children.
2019-02-07 22:00
#30
 | 
Europe Pini_ 
1: Most of these ''millions of people killed" havent even been documented. Most documented sources pinpoint a way lower number of deaths 2: Capitalism and imperialism has caused way more deaths 3: Holodomor, while being a catastrophic famine, was not caused neither by communism nor by Stalin. It has been made a scandal only because a USA businessman, Wiiliam Hearst, made a complot using the methods of Goebbels propaganda. Here's a link where you can read about it, but you seek more information if you want to: mariosousa.se/Liesconcerningthehistoryof..
2019-02-07 22:09
#31
 | 
Europe Pini_ 
If you want, I can link you some posts with some good info and reliable sources, but it's in spanish
2019-02-07 22:10
"Most of these ''millions of people killed" havent even been documented." Just when I was about to make you look like a tard you did it yourself by saying: "Capitalism and imperialism has caused way more deaths" Show me the documented deaths now.
2019-02-13 21:46
#287
 | 
Europe Pini_ 
South American Genocides, Congo's genocide by Leopold II, every african colonial war, Churchill's Bengal famine and a very very loooong etcetera
2019-02-13 21:51
Typical dumbass needs to join whatever bullsh*t you've listed. I said DOCUMENTED death. I playing your game, inbred.
2019-02-13 21:58
#40
 | 
Europe Pini_ 
Btw, what was indeed a planned famine was the one caused by Chirchill in Bengal, resulting in 2-3 million deaths
2019-02-07 22:17
#41
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
The conversation isn’t about Churchill, I’m well aware of the atrocities that occurred under his rule.
2019-02-07 22:18
#43
 | 
Europe Pini_ 
That was only some bonus info, the actual reply to your post is above, #30 and #31
2019-02-07 22:21
#59
TACO | 
Brazil fkhltv 
what about hiroshima? what about the americans industries that destroyed latin america countries economies? what about u japanese motherfuckers on the Nanjing Massacre? China, oh boy, sure loved the goddamn opium wars. oh, and Paraguay, that was simple destroyed by Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay by the support of the UK? lets not talk about Africa, right? destroyed thanks to resources exploration of foreign countries... please lets not talk about the american military ops on countries who had/have oil and the millions of ppl dead thanks to the need for power. my country lost a lot of lifes this goddamn year thanks to Vale, a minerium company, that did not care about simple security actions. capitalism on theory is great! communism also great! that doesnt mean that, on practice, we, as humans, are fucked up in the head and dont give a fuck about ppl dying
2019-02-07 22:32
You've said it yourself "totalitarian". Totalitarian regimes kill. Capitalistic or communist, they kill.
2019-02-07 22:49
#196
 | 
United States pSilent 
A "totalitarian communist regime" is an oxymoron, since, but its very definition, Communist countries lack formal government. At least in theory.
2019-02-08 00:32
Best ideology
2019-02-13 17:29
#5
 | 
United States jcv999 
Taxation is theft
2019-02-07 21:45
#18
 | 
Europe Pini_ 
Ok so you'd like to live somewhere without any kind of infrastructure or services lmao
2019-02-07 22:00
You pay for them
2019-02-07 22:14
#37
 | 
Europe Pini_ 
So... In the end you are paying taxes again
2019-02-07 22:16
no because taxes are proportional to your income (even worse progressive nowadays) and YOU ARE FORCED TO PAY THEM. Without taxes you buy your childrens education and access to streets like you buy food and housing. If you don't need it, you don't pay for it. Healthcare insurace will actually be based on how healthy you are. And without regulations all this stuff will be a lot cheaper because it will be easier to make. Monopolies will probably exist, but only because they'll offer the best and cheapest services in order to stay a monopoly, which benefits the customer.
2019-02-07 22:26
#263
 | 
Europe Pini_ 
So, if you dont have money to pay your education or health services you just deserve to die
2019-02-13 17:28
no you work
2019-02-15 21:58
or if you can't work you ask for help from your local community or a charity, you don't need useless government bureaucrats for that
2019-02-15 22:14
explain it (you can't)
2019-02-07 22:49
Somalia is waiting for you man.
2019-02-07 22:49
you'd probably need a small pay 1-2% to prevent the creation of private militias and other minor stuff to protect the ruleset
2019-02-07 22:53
Is this 1 or 2% acceptable theft then?
2019-02-07 22:54
yes
2019-02-07 23:00
Is a willingly accepted theft still a theft? It seems contradictory to me
2019-02-07 23:03
1-2% is still better that up to 85% marginal rate including vat and employee&employer social security contributions here in germany. But this is excluding corporate taxes which is essentially double taxation because all lost revenue gets passed onto the customer
2019-02-07 23:27
So taxes are not theft as long as it is a level willingly agreed with (like 2% in your case) ? But become theft if they out scale what you are ready to pay? Am I right?
2019-02-07 23:35
yeah at some point you need compromises and be more practical than ideological but still it isn't ideal
2019-02-07 23:41
But isn't that what is already happening? I mean with vote the whole population make a compromise about the right level of taxes they collectively wants? If most of people wants 2% then the 2% guy got elected right?
2019-02-07 23:48
just living in complete anarchy and still having a civilised society is of course an utopian thought. However we need to strive for a smaller government which won't happen as long as women and poor people can vote
2019-02-07 23:45
I won't enter in the women part. I believe it will pollute my understanding of your wishes on the taxes system. If I follow you correctly, then vote "weight" should be proportional to taxes paid amount? Lets say someone's vote paying 20k taxes should have 20 times more value than someone else's vote paying 1k? Am I correct to your willing?
2019-02-07 23:52
yes that's what i mean
2019-02-07 23:58
And strictly proportional as I given an exemple or more bracket like such as what Friedrich Wilhelm IV did with his Dreiklassenwahlrecht ?
2019-02-08 00:07
another option would be a government which finances itself by providing services like roads for a fee
2019-02-07 23:28
Are not taxes exactly that : a fee?
2019-02-07 23:33
see #49, i mean a fee like a buisiness only for services you actually use
2019-02-07 23:36
okay, in french we have different words, french "taxes" means what you meant as "fees", while english "taxes" refer as "taxes on revenues" in french. But with that system, how do you pay to be protected by the army? What is the chargeable event that make you pay the fee for army? About #49, aren't taxes collectively decided already? Meaning you chose what you are ready to pay for already?
2019-02-07 23:56
taxes are forced, fees are just the price you pay for a service. I wouldn't consider buying food a tax (except vat)
2019-02-07 23:52
It doesn't answer me how you pay for army, police or such kind of services. Again, What is the chargeable event that make you pay for it? For your understanding, just in case, the chargeable event of paying VAT of an item is when you buy that said item.
2019-02-07 23:55
you pay them money, then they'll protect you
2019-02-07 23:59
But how do you pay them money? When you ask them for help? I believe if you start to buy and build tanks, train soldiers, etc.. only when you need their help it is already too late. So what system could we use in order to do that in an useful way if not by classical taxes?
2019-02-08 00:04
just like private security today
2019-02-08 00:08
Today, you pay for private security when you need them to protect you. But when you don't, they work for someone else in order to keep their men and materials train and ready when you need them. The same with army would means the army to work for other countries while to don't want them to protect you, that's what you mean?
2019-02-08 00:21
It’s a fee without your consent.
2019-02-07 23:37
Yeah go it, see #169 for more details.
2019-02-07 23:46
or a vote only for people with property who can collectively decide where THEIR money goes instead of people who have nothing to lose voting to steal money from OTHERS
2019-02-07 23:31
But isn't VAT a tax that even people without property pay? And what about wealthy people just renting things, would they were paying taxes or not? able to decide or not?
2019-02-07 23:36
only property taxes no vat etc. , and rich people who rent themselves most likely own a buisiness that owns property (offices or an Investment)
2019-02-07 23:48
What if all their owning (real estates, company, investments) are based outside of your country. They won't be paying anything, is that correct?
2019-02-08 00:23
+1
2019-02-07 23:08
#206
 | 
Palestine Baitor69 
name checks out. loved that name
2019-02-08 01:05
#205
 | 
Palestine Baitor69 
+999999
2019-02-08 01:05
Fully Automated Luxury Space Liberalism
2019-02-07 21:46
Leftcom
2019-02-07 21:50
#10
China o_O 
equality
2019-02-07 21:51
#15
 | 
Russia avocadosatlaw 
My ass
2019-02-07 21:58
ancap get off my site commie fuckers
2019-02-07 21:59
KICK JUGI, disbandoptic
2019-02-07 21:59
#20
 | 
Norway Outin 
Did you just learn that word?
2019-02-07 22:00
I'm on the "right-wing", I believe in Free Market and in Capitalism, and I hate the idea that Europe should accept immigrants - because they bring crime with them.
2019-02-07 22:02
Is not people moving around a needed part of free market? And is not a mechanism of capitalism to look for the cheapest way to produce in order to increase benefits? Including as low wages as possible, a topic where immigrants are great competitors?
2019-02-07 22:53
Answers to complex questions don’t come in simple packaging.
2019-02-07 23:09
This one does and it is pretty straight forward. It is 101 of economy.
2019-02-07 23:10
And you really think that this question is really just about a text-book definitions of economics in a perfect world?
2019-02-07 23:29
It is pretty much, especially since globalization made the competition worldwide.
2019-02-07 23:39
good thinking i can add that ue should be destroyed. XIX Century capitalism was good.
2019-02-09 11:56
social conservative
2019-02-07 22:03
#56
Czech Republic Wer_ 
+1 i guess?
2019-02-07 22:31
#24
YEKINDAR | 
China lxxl2 
Anti-MIBR
2019-02-07 22:03
Libertarianism
2019-02-07 22:04
wow Libertarian Right polak wow I though there in Poland only left-wing people
2019-02-07 23:07
#247
 | 
Poland Wewek 
lul
2019-02-09 20:03
left wing? They're conservatives
2019-02-20 18:28
what? poland is the most conservative nation in europe
2019-02-20 18:36
+1
2019-02-20 18:30
Right-Wing Neoliberal.
2019-02-07 22:05
beautiful idea. Welcome in perfect world (:
2019-02-09 11:58
#28
 | 
Germany Pellinskii 
Guillotine the Rich
2019-02-07 22:06
+1
2019-02-07 22:52
moderate right
2019-02-07 22:09
suckmydickism
2019-02-07 22:13
#84
 | 
Denmark how_much_ 
I can subscribe to this where can I learn more.
2019-02-07 22:43
#38
 | 
Italy Enrico_Fermi 
homosexuality
2019-02-07 22:16
fag
2019-02-13 17:28
I agree with Socrates, so I guess I'm a fascist.
2019-02-07 22:24
Neoveganism
2019-02-07 22:25
National socialism.
2019-02-07 22:48
#121
 | 
Panama xemzex 
Reported
2019-02-07 23:04
#125
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
For what exactly?
2019-02-07 23:06
#131
 | 
Panama xemzex 
For being a nazi?
2019-02-07 23:07
Yeah, different opinions and beliefs not allowed. Only nazis would do that. Oh wait
2019-02-07 23:09
#136
 | 
Panama xemzex 
Nt nazi
2019-02-07 23:10
You're better at being a "nazi" than me. Well done))
2019-02-07 23:10
#141
 | 
Panama xemzex 
Because reporting someone surely is the same as being a nazi lul
2019-02-07 23:11
Well, you believe that I should be banned for my beliefs, I don't think you should be banned for your beliefs, no matter what they are. So by that logic you're a better "nazi" than I am :^)
2019-02-07 23:13
#142
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
Whenever someone goes against the system they’ve been brainwashed in, they all react the same.
2019-02-07 23:11
People get angry when what they conceive as true is questioned. Even if what they believe is proven wrong, they often continue to believe in it anyway. It's a natural reaction, sadly.
2019-02-07 23:21
#148
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
Yeah, of course. They are too terrified to even consider the fact that they’ve been lied to all this time.
2019-02-07 23:23
#139
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
lmao, instead of being a slave to the blatant indoctrination you’ve been a victim of, how about look into different political ideologies, specifically national socialism. Don’t react with instant hate because that’s what you were trained to do.
2019-02-07 23:11
#144
 | 
Panama xemzex 
A political ideology that first started as socialism and then went on to become nothing more than a supremacist belief. Definitely brainwashing is what's altering my view
2019-02-07 23:16
It is not because Nazi party was called that than national socialism is being nazi. Same as it is not because Hitler was a man that every men are Hitler, you got it right? To me national socialism, sounds like a socialist country with protectionist (economical and/or on immigration) laws. Kind of Aufstehen party in germany.
2019-02-08 00:01
smart guy
2019-02-07 23:05
I see what you did here.
2019-02-07 23:05
#145
 | 
Lithuania OnyxLT 
based simo hayha
2019-02-07 23:15
#201
 | 
United States pSilent 
Why? Never understood the appeal.
2019-02-08 01:01
Simply put, It's the ideology I agree the most with. Would take way too long to make a list of everything I like/dislike about it. Kind of dull answer. I know.
2019-02-08 13:55
gulag welcome
2019-02-09 11:59
The best
2019-02-13 21:51
libertarian socialism
2019-02-07 22:52
+1
2019-02-09 11:55
#116
 | 
Norway NosTheBoss 
Conservative Anarchism
2019-02-07 22:59
wtf
2019-02-07 23:04
#130
 | 
Brazil adre221 
Ancap?
2019-02-07 23:07
Libertarian Right
2019-02-07 23:06
Nationalist anarchism
2019-02-07 23:07
Social democrat (Melenchon, Sanders, etc.. German SPD, french PS is not what I call Social democracy) But since most of people disagree I vote for the most economic liberalism offer I can get (Macron, Trump) and take advantages of it.
2019-02-07 23:14
democracy is bad
2019-02-09 12:00
In 40k years of human history, we never find something else able to improve human life as much as democracy did. Bad maybe but still best.
2019-02-09 14:20
''best'' not even good when 89 iq bum have equal vote like professor from Harvard. U must also accept that most of society is stupid. Democracy is the tyranny of the majority.
2019-02-09 15:52
Perhaps this Harvard professor should teach on internet in order to increase the average knowledge instead of crying he worth only one vote. Don't you think? Democracy is indeed a tyranny, as every other system. So this alone doesn't make it worst than any other.
2019-02-09 17:18
Average knowledge is nothing with average iq level u can teach knowledge but cannot teach iq points that makes the most of society is stupid so clearly democracy is bad bcs that stupid majority takes places over smarter ppls like proffesors or high iq guys. Democracy is not worst than any other(look at communism which is da worst) but we have better ideology than democracy.
2019-02-09 17:31
You were the only one comparing IQ to knowledge. I didn't. Read again.
2019-02-09 17:32
dude knowledge isnt IQ btw easly rekt u
2019-02-09 17:37
Yes that's why I didn't compared both, you did. Auto rekt I guess.
2019-02-09 17:41
Eh knowledge= u can learn something, stupid guy can hard work and learn to but iq= brilliance, using your knowledge in a proper way, easier understanding, ability to solve difficult tasks
2019-02-09 17:50
Seems you don't have any of them as you can't get neither figure out you are the only one using both in a same scale.
2019-02-09 17:52
i have knowledge but that i have high iq ? idk maybe still more than u :)
2019-02-09 17:54
#140
 | 
Sweden themightyone 
Cannibalism.
2019-02-07 23:11
#149
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
Now that’s extremely unepic 😟
2019-02-07 23:24
#211
 | 
United States pSilent 
Never been tried before. Could work.
2019-02-08 01:12
#224
 | 
Sweden themightyone 
As long as you dont eat the brain, it can.
2019-02-09 11:48
#156
NiKo | 
Serbia Krosis 
Its time to get despotism back into fashion
2019-02-07 23:36
Autism
2019-02-07 23:39
The best one tbh
2019-02-07 23:53
#162
 | 
Brazil MadBettorGrr 
Antibolsonarism
2019-02-07 23:41
Because he outlawed LGBT fagism?
2019-02-13 21:52
+1 DFERWDSGSDFGDS
2019-02-13 21:57
#305
 | 
Brazil MadBettorGrr 
outlawed? wat? do u even know what ure talking about?
2019-02-13 22:18
Yes fag I know exactly what I was talking about. If only every nation out there follows him. LGBTQ is cancer.
2019-02-13 23:01
#307
 | 
Brazil MadBettorGrr 
Kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk ok kid
2019-02-13 23:27
Communist
2019-02-07 23:43
Monarchism
2019-02-07 23:45
ez for communism
2019-02-07 23:47
Libertarianism Anyone that identifies with anything different from that is evil or haven't met libertarianism
2019-02-07 23:48
#181
 | 
Panama xemzex 
Wtf kLango
2019-02-07 23:55
Why would you think that others are evil? Aren't there fair critiques of the free market in certain situations such as healthcare and workers rights?
2019-02-08 00:00
If you meet libertarianism you'll see how workers rights are a bad thing for the workers Then if you continue being a statist even knowing how bad it is for people, you are evil
2019-02-08 00:12
That's pretty interesting. I wouldn't advocate for crazy things like a very high minimum wage as it comes with clear negative effects. But I think that some basic regulations to help the worker are necessary. In my opinion, some of these would be an average minimum wage (as we have it in America today), laws against child labor, and laws protecting worker safety and health.
2019-02-08 00:40
The guy that hires the workers will always want someone competent and he'll pay everything if it is necessary to hire that someone, that's why there are people that receive money above the minimum wage, and that's why the concept that "not having a minimum wage would make everyone receive a very low wage" is wrong. By the way, minimum wages are not good, they prevent unexperienced people to start working and it increases the unemployment. And another crazy thing to think about, did you know that the minimum wage was created by eugenics? To keep minorities out of jobs (kill them). I recommend this read about it: mises.org/wire/minimum-wage-and-progress..
2019-02-08 01:03
I agree that in fields that required skilled workers, most of the time wages work themselves out. But the real place where the minimum wage is important is in jobs which require unskilled workers. For example, in factory jobs. It can be seen throughout history and even today. There are many workers who are exploited and paid barely anything (such as in China). This is especially true when big corporations arise and bully away the competition, thus decreasing competition and wages. Another negative of no minimum wage would be the incentive for mass immigration. Business owners can appeal to poor citizens in bad situations (for example refugees from the middle east) and bring them into their country to have them do low skilled labor and exploit them/pay them low wages. These people would not know any better and would not be able to make the informed decision to say no and work for another company.
2019-02-08 01:16
Yeah, that happens in China due to the excessive amount of government regulations. Another thing is the demand of workers there, where there are so many of them that some accept lower wages, which is not necessarily bad, it is better to receive a little than nothing, right? If China put a higher minimum wage, some companies will have to leave the country or close some industries because of the lower profit, that would cause the resignation of a lot of workers, making the unemployment rate increase. About the refugees, it is a matter of time for them to find out about the claim for better conditions. While that, it is better for them to have a low wage in another country than be in the middle of a civil war in their country. If all countries put minimum wages too high, all those refugees will be just beggars, having no/little work opportunities.
2019-02-08 02:14
#207
 | 
United States pSilent 
I don't think establishing a dichotomy where "Libertarian" is synonymous with "morally correct" and everything else is synonymous with "morally incorrect" logically follows.
2019-02-08 01:05
Yeah, I was a bit exaggerated
2019-02-08 01:09
Insurrectionary anarchism
2019-02-07 23:50
#190
 | 
Dominican Republic SantoDomingo 
Minarchism, but with closed borders.
2019-02-08 00:13
left market anarchist, socially left/center except guns fully pro gun
2019-02-08 01:08
Communists are pro gun?
2019-02-09 15:54
i know, i was saying this because retards on this site
2019-02-11 21:39
Commies are pro guns owned by themselves only. This is why all commies need to be killed.
2019-02-13 21:54
"Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary." -Marx
2019-02-14 11:38
Workers should have guns
2019-02-14 11:39
Why did you bring this topic ? Politics is and has always been a utter SHIT, useless way to solve social conflicts. I'm anarchist, and the only way to solve society's problems is the free market, with no regulations, monopolies, oligopolies and, the most important, no politicians. We need natural leaders with capability to lead our communities to success without harming others. Politics only leads to war and destruction.
2019-02-08 02:24
#218
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
Lmao. Anarchists are the cringiest people on the internet and you are literally no different, the type of anarchists like yourself have some kind of fake utopian mindset that the world will be all sunshine and rainbows if the state is abolished, and they are free to do as they please. The unpredictability of the human psyche means it will never work. People will become savages in only a matter of time.
2019-02-08 02:33
And statists think the world IS a sunshine, rainbows and cute unicorns. Have you ever read the meaning of "utopia" in any dictionary ? We try to offer an alternative way that has not been put on trial yet, but the filthy politicians would NEVER give up their power and positions in society to make improvements. ALSO, we, anarchists, believe that we can solve some problems, not erradicate them, as the politicians promise with ill intent. You can't possibly know if it would work or not because, as i stated above, no one tried, all you're saying are assumptions, a hypotetical scenario if we tried anarchy with the free market. Let us try and we'll show you that private companies (not necessarily large or medium, little are enough) along with a real law (the private property law is the only right law ethically and rationally speaking) can and will be better than the state. Let me ask you something: are you happy paying your taxes to your japanese politicians ? if so, rejoice, that's why everything in japan is expensive as hell. kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
2019-02-08 02:43
#222
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
The world isn’t sunshine lmao I don’t think that, I never have.
2019-02-08 02:45
Free market anarchist xD
2019-02-09 15:54
is it wrong ? if so, tell me why.
2019-02-10 02:05
Someone need to uphold property right, how can you do that without a state?
2019-02-10 15:32
Besides taxes (theft), did the state interfere when you bought your cellphone/computer? The house is yours because you bought it or because the state says so ? If you answer me the second one, i have bad news for you. The state steals your property, they can't protect it and rob it at the same time.
2019-02-11 00:13
Police and the state uphold property rights, what happens if you steal a car? You get arrested by the police from laws that the state made, in ancap you can steal a car and noone can stop you or punish you because who upholds the "nap"?
2019-02-11 13:37
You're not getting arrested because of the law of the state, but because stealing is wrong. If you put state's law above moral and ethics, you have a dictatorship, the only difference is the level of state intervention.
2019-02-13 09:19
who will arrest you in ancapistan? private cops?
2019-02-13 09:57
#219
 | 
Japan Getp0x0st 
Anarcho-Primitism
2019-02-08 02:29
i r8 this b8 8/8 people will bite it
2019-02-08 02:43
He has loli in his flair, no one is baiting this shit))
2019-02-09 15:55
No one will and you're a retard.
2019-02-13 21:55
polticial views are a trap to divide humanity so they can easier control ur ass. u better stay off that shit.
2019-02-09 11:50
that doesn't make any sense
2019-02-13 09:26
Monarchist, Neoliberal
2019-02-09 12:03
wait where tf u r from? the swiss dont have a monarch?
2019-02-13 21:55
no and most monarchists arent from monarchies
2019-02-20 18:28
Marxist-Leninist-Maoist
2019-02-09 15:52
social liberalism
2019-02-10 02:06
anarchism
2019-02-10 02:11
#251
Japan esy 
Anarchism on a culture basis. Lands without states. No Races only cultures.
2019-02-10 02:24
why ;( u listen to punk music too? Kappa
2019-02-13 21:55
A mix of conservatism, nationalism and libertarianism
2019-02-10 15:38
gross
2019-02-13 21:32
poland n.3
2019-02-13 21:54
finland 1 norway 2
2019-02-13 21:54
#255
 | 
Brazil MaxWolf 
Libertarian
2019-02-11 00:16
RON SWANSON SPOTTED
2019-02-13 21:54
depends on how you define terms, i'm very far left and very libertarian. On the political compass test im basically bottom left corner. But I mean classic libertarianism, not the modern misuse of the term which is really tyranny by corporations
2019-02-13 09:25
#266
allu | 
North America hesh 
otherwise known as a cuck
2019-02-13 17:29
retard spotted
2019-02-13 21:29
#268
 | 
Europe hltv007 
nt cia,fsb,mi5,mossad
2019-02-13 17:36
nt trik
2019-02-13 17:36
#270
 | 
Brazil stxzin 
I'm a conservative
2019-02-13 17:37
#271
 | 
Europe O1ek 
Liberalism, Progressivism
2019-02-13 17:39
high IQ spotted
2019-02-13 21:32
#272
ropz | 
Czech Republic rusteD 
Centrism. In the balance i believe. Every test i take i end up in the middle and slightly to the right. For sjws im extreme far rightist. Fot rightist im a leftist cuck. Meanwhile i just use my brain. Theres not just two ways how to solve problems/run a country. I belive in public educational and healthcare systems, armed forces, firefighters etc. On the other hand eveyrone should be responsible for their financial decision. Welfere system should be minimalistic and only support people who have worked and payed taxes and lost their jobs. Wellfare support shouldnt be payed in cash/vouchers but by taxs cuts. And things like that...
2019-02-13 17:43
yes I also believe armed forces and firefighters exist
2019-02-13 21:31
#277
ropz | 
Czech Republic rusteD 
American brain. The key word is PUBLIC.
2019-02-13 21:39
yes i also believe public armed forces exist wait what
2019-02-13 21:40
#289
 | 
Spain TeknoLenin 
marxism-leninism
2019-02-13 21:52
reported
2019-02-20 18:24
#313
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
Bump for visibility
2019-02-19 03:44
Soft socialism/social-liberalism
2019-02-20 18:39
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.