Thread has been deleted
Last comment
reaction time
ropz | 
Estonia 200iqGuy 
humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime 200 ms here not bad i think whats yours
2019-02-10 13:41
#1
China wusif 
You scored 184.0. You're currently in the top 98 percentile for this test!
2019-02-10 13:42
#3
ropz | 
Estonia 200iqGuy 
chinese eyes
2019-02-10 13:43
average 124 ms out of 5 tries
2019-02-10 13:45
ez 76ms average imgur.com/a/aBv5nsL
2019-02-10 15:06
Quicksilver?
2019-02-10 15:28
#2
 | 
Europe pencilvester 
Inhuman reaction
2019-02-10 13:42
#4
 | 
Portugal astacp 
60hz monitor here. not gonna fall on this one!!
2019-02-10 13:43
#53
 | 
Finland v3tu 
It only makes 0-10 ms difference. 0ms if the button happens to come up just at the start of a refresh cycle, 10 ms if at the end.
2019-02-10 14:19
#5
 | 
Poland wiktorex 
1 time i got 22ms smh
2019-02-10 13:44
#9
ropz | 
Estonia 200iqGuy 
prefire doesnt count
2019-02-10 13:45
#14
 | 
Poland wiktorex 
prefire? you can't lol
2019-02-10 13:51
#22
 | 
Hungary Shaperz 
yes, you can get lucky with prefire
2019-02-10 14:01
+1
2019-02-10 14:27
#6
 | 
Sweden BroIlan 
not this site, but i ve got 350ms average
2019-02-10 13:45
#11
ropz | 
Estonia 200iqGuy 
Brolulan how old are u
2019-02-10 13:47
#20
 | 
Sweden BroIlan 
i cant say such a thing on a internet. But im really young
2019-02-10 14:00
you're 100ms above average bro
2019-02-10 14:10
#43
 | 
Sweden BroIlan 
sad but i cant to anything with it :)
2019-02-10 14:16
maybe old peripherals/monitor ?
2019-02-10 14:16
#54
 | 
Sweden BroIlan 
i have good setup :a
2019-02-10 14:19
60hz 215 ms
2019-02-10 13:45
#10
 | 
Denmark keN^v^ 
Average | 211 ms 5/5 Tries woke up 20 min ago could be better
2019-02-10 13:45
#15
 | 
Europe pencilvester 
Damn...what a madlad
2019-02-10 13:52
#34
 | 
Denmark keN^v^ 
Right thanks pal!
2019-02-10 14:14
This test is pointless, it's limited by your monitor specs. p.s. also human eye is more sensitive to movement than change in color.
2019-02-10 13:49
movement on a screen is change of color though.
2019-02-10 13:57
It's natural response to react to movement, however when it's change in color then I find myself having to consciously focus on screen to catch the exact moment. Then I miss a click and I'm late not because my reaction is bad, but because it's not natural to me to react to change to color. Then it pulls out average between actual reaction times and times when I didn't actually react properly due to lack of focus.
2019-02-10 14:22
if you are not using a shitty tv or something you monitor should add max 5-10ms
2019-02-10 13:58
Monitor refresh rate, input delay, response time alone can easily add up to over 10ms. For example, I've 60hz monitor, 8ms gtg, idk what input delay, I'd assume at least 10ms or something. That'd make up 34ms.
2019-02-10 14:09
ok yeah, didnt consider that 60hz adds a lot too
2019-02-10 14:13
#13
D0cC | 
Netherlands stevelul 
You scored 197.0. You're currently in the top 96 percentile for this test!
2019-02-10 13:49
a little better on second try gyazo.com/1d4a41d264e85040b685694faae391..
2019-02-10 13:55
#21
 | 
France iNolake 
You scored 243.0. You're currently in the top 77 percentile for this test! im so slow lmao
2019-02-10 14:00
no you're not, 250 is average for 99% of humans young people can go down to 200
2019-02-10 14:11
#114
NiKo | 
Romania mtimaN 
Lots of cheaters play here. 243 is at least top 50%
2019-02-10 15:10
#23
 | 
Brazil Boldro1965 
Im top 33 Just because the first one I fucked up. 400ms the rest was 200 etc
2019-02-10 14:07
Got 202 just because I somehow hit 68ms on the first out of five lol
2019-02-10 14:10
#27
 | 
Iceland coolest_user 
You scored 170.0. You're currently in the top 99 percentile for this test! how post screenshot men 😎😎😎
2019-02-10 14:17
203 ms
2019-02-10 14:13
WTF I JUST DID 98MS
2019-02-10 14:14
2019-02-10 14:15
between 155 and 185 on a good day, 200 on a slow day better equipment like 240hz monitor and good mouse can easily take 30ms off your reaction time if youre currently over 200 average.
2019-02-10 14:13
Fast af, adderall?
2019-02-10 14:14
nope just played a lot of cod as a kid and good genes i guess
2019-02-10 14:14
i guess that helps, oh and the 240hz monitor too i played mostly rpgs and later 1.6 css as a kid
2019-02-10 14:15
yeah that 155 i actually got on a CRT monitor
2019-02-10 14:15
was it a lucky predict click or standard reaction tho?
2019-02-10 14:16
i dont go for prefire on reaction time test, that defeats the purpose of the test. getting under 200ms reaction time becomes a lot easier if you relax and visualize what is going to happen, then your hand will react automatically when it happens, your brain doesnt need to process anything. its easier to get under 200 in game in practiced situations than cold on some online test.
2019-02-10 14:18
i guess so, but i notice i'm way much faster during a competitive match, like flicking into people with awp or rifles sometimes i outaim and headshot people with ak before they shoot me with awp that must be under 250ms
2019-02-10 14:19
just got average 185, today is not my best day
2019-02-10 14:20
its still pretty good
2019-02-10 14:21
not enough to make up for my ping
2019-02-10 14:22
when i played cod i consistently aimed and clicked at ppl in 200ms, its a really big advantage in that game if you have fast reaction time, in csgo its still very useful but accuracy is way more important. its more important to react consistently within a window of a couple ms than to try to get the fastest time possible. in csgo if you keep your crosshair steady, and someone strafes through, you only have a window of a few frames to click their head.
2019-02-10 14:22
i wonder whats the ms reaction time for clipping people on dust 2 mid, you know trough the door (-50something hp) when they jump clicking the middle is almost impossible imo
2019-02-10 14:23
clicking the middle is possible but i think its around or under 150ms, i barely cant do it, if i aim a few pixels into the door then i can tag them.
2019-02-10 14:24
when u consider ping, server and client lags, 64 tick it becomes almost impossible tho :D i would love to try it on a lan connection
2019-02-10 14:26
man my ping is so unstable that sometimes i peek a guy, scope with awp, wait for awp to become accurate, click on him, see awp scope out, 200-300ms later enemy strafes and headshots me and i see a bullet hole from awp behind him in the wall.
2019-02-10 14:27
lol same, it's even worse when u see the blood on the wall but the hit doesn't register, here in italy the internet is disgusting
2019-02-10 14:28
youtu.be/ztvFPMfsovs its basically impossible to play the game some days. on my screen, i shoot the first guy, bullet goes right through him, i scope in again, wait, shoot the second guy, awp scopes out, i die. in gotv demo i dont even shoot the 2nd bullet and the 1st didnt register. this is with generally 35-60 ping on mm. it looks like i have 250 ping instead of 50. but net graph usually says 35-60. sometimes 70-80 and then it gets really bad. no packet loss.
2019-02-10 14:30
yeah it happens a lot mm servers are literally trash, u have to get lucky in a 1v1
2019-02-10 14:30
its not much better on faceit unless i play NL server and its a good day. i remember one game i got 25 ping on NL server and i could actually jiggle peek awpers. that was an easy game. it was on cobble, i think i didnt die to awp once that T side.
2019-02-10 14:32
i remember the first time i played on faceit with 128tick and 50ping average, it felt like heaven rofl everything was so smooth and people thought i was walling or something :D imagine playing on good servers with 0 ping
2019-02-10 14:34
imagine living in a different EU country where anyone can get high rate fiber internet for a low price and have 10 ping
2019-02-10 14:43
like norway or sweden feelsbadman
2019-02-10 15:05
i still cant awp someone through mid doors on dust2 without clipping the edge though
2019-02-10 14:15
220/240
2019-02-10 14:13
170ms on average, keep in mind that a mouse with a polling rate of 1000hz and a good refresh rate affect this, I recommend getting both.
2019-02-10 14:19
444 ms with 18 yo should i be worried?
2019-02-10 14:15
how potato is your PC?
2019-02-10 14:17
2010? no its older xDD im not in my gaming pc
2019-02-10 14:22
probably 20fps in windows
2019-02-10 14:27
237ms 5/5 im to old for this shit, where I was young I could easly do < 200 ms
2019-02-10 14:16
I don't remember these things existing before xD
2019-02-10 14:28
208ms average, best 198
2019-02-10 14:17
I DID 98 imgur.com/a/luafFRi wtf
2019-02-10 14:20
i suppose its impossible to get that low without "pre clicking"
2019-02-10 14:21
correct
2019-02-10 14:23
yeah, i think so
2019-02-10 14:24
but was a very lucky"prefire"
2019-02-10 14:24
I'm 45yo and got 218ms, I'm okay with that, feared it would be around 300ms by now haha
2019-02-10 14:17
workshop map? link please
2019-02-10 14:21
190 average, 171 best
2019-02-10 14:20
250ms
2019-02-10 14:27
178ms prefire that last one idk how just lucky
2019-02-10 14:28
178ms is not prefire
2019-02-10 14:44
the last one i do 27ms so yes this is a prefire you have 5 try
2019-02-10 14:45
oh you mean 178 average that means you got like 210 average on the other 4 clicks though
2019-02-10 14:46
yeah you understand sorry if my english if fucked up xD
2019-02-10 14:46
it helps to use periods and commas haha
2019-02-10 14:47
oh yeah that true I forgot to use a dot after "178ms" xD my bad
2019-02-10 14:49
#77
Xyp9x | 
Cyprus Xeeh 
Got 186
2019-02-10 14:28
62 ms best
2019-02-10 14:30
#85
 | 
Norway rogueplayer 
You scored 185.0. You're currently in the top 98 percentile for this test! best was 165ms click 180hz, 400 dpi, 500hz polling rate
2019-02-10 14:32
Got an average of 166ms, but got a 144hz monitor so its easier for me
2019-02-10 14:34
You scored 1091.0. You're currently in the top 3 percentile for this test! ez
2019-02-10 14:34
i cant get below 250 on this site (i think because of laptop touchpad) but i got 220 on another site (i could use spacebar instead).
2019-02-10 14:35
yes touchpad is not good option, recommend mouse x D
2019-02-10 14:48
You scored 314.0. You're currently in the top 35 percentile for this test! Was very stable for me, but I did the test with a laptop's pad, so I guess it's not as reactive as a gaming mouse
2019-02-10 14:47
You scored 290.0. You're currently in the top 46 percentile for this test!
2019-02-10 14:48
2019-02-10 14:49
#101
 | 
Brazil xhrp 
239 xD
2019-02-10 14:49
average 294 ms, last try 314
2019-02-10 14:49
You scored 204.0. You're currently in the top 92 percentile for this test! first try and im 24 years old. i think somewhere around 200 is considered good and if u hit <200 then you are really quick.
2019-02-10 14:53
199 average ez
2019-02-10 14:52
#105
 | 
Norway supremoxd 
will someone try their luck against me in remembering the numbers ;) prntscr.com/mj4ssb
2019-02-10 14:56
thats too easy to cheat try this imgur.com/a/aBv5nsL
2019-02-10 15:05
#111
 | 
Norway supremoxd 
that's cheat
2019-02-10 15:07
#128
 | 
Norway supremoxd 
hahaha
2019-02-10 19:10
cheated for sure
2019-02-10 16:11
#127
 | 
Norway supremoxd 
yeah i cheated xd. Still cool though
2019-02-10 19:10
avg 193(107 best) 26 yrs on 60Hz Monitor
2019-02-10 15:01
nice prefire
2019-02-10 15:02
#112
 | 
United Kingdom IgglePiggle 
305ms average, im 36 2 kids no sleep so i think thats pretty fucking good
2019-02-10 15:08
tries 2 of 5, 9ms ez
2019-02-10 15:14
#117
allu | 
Sweden Aquaaaa 
Best i got was 215avg One time i played this just trying to prefire and i got lucky with a 1ms xD
2019-02-10 15:16
prntscr.com/mj55yl 163,170,187,188,189 ms 179~
2019-02-10 15:32
#120
 | 
Other WorldIsAFuck 
200 ms 60 hz monitor
2019-02-10 15:45
I got 18ms by prefire xD
2019-02-10 15:54
i have 230 avg, but i think my reaction in game is faster, but not that much
2019-02-10 15:55
386 avarage , I know grandpa reflexes , whatever...
2019-02-10 15:57
wow scored so bad
2019-02-10 15:59
#125
 | 
France mdK_ 
~200ms
2019-02-10 16:01
prnt.sc/mj4oo9 is it average or good? Never done these before
2019-02-11 09:23
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.