Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Accurate Political Compass test
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
This is the most accurate political ideology placement test I have found. My result:
2019-02-18 03:59
Luxembourg @Trik 
Authoritarian right.
2019-02-18 04:03
+2 for result and nick... great song
2019-02-18 04:38
Brazil Karl_Tanner 
2019-02-18 05:13
2019-02-18 05:27
Reply needs to have actual content
2019-02-18 05:29
Japan Getp0x0st 
lol libtard
2019-02-18 05:30
>socialist >libtard choose one
2019-02-18 05:39
Japan Getp0x0st 
it says libetarian idiot
2019-02-18 05:42
it says libertarian because there's no state. doesn't have anything to do with liberals
2019-02-18 05:43
u dont seem to understand what a liberal is
2019-02-18 10:17
what is a liberal then?
2019-02-18 16:30
in usa 'liberal' is used to describe socialdemocrats
2019-02-18 16:59
which is why a socialist isn't a liberal. Liberals are still pro capitalism, a socialist isnt.
2019-02-18 17:00
the liberal/authority axis has nothing to do with socialism/capitalism
2019-02-18 17:01
I know. But when people refer to liberals they refer to center or center left people like many democrats are and such. Liberalism is pro capitalism.
2019-02-18 17:02
liberalism is pro liberalism you can be a liberal and both socialist or capitalist same as you can be authoritarian and both socialist or capitalist these are 2 different axis
2019-02-18 17:03
mate he called me a libtard. libtards, in the US, are center left people, which I'm not.
2019-02-18 17:05
yeah, but we're talking about the axis still, you're an anarcho-communist
2019-02-18 17:11
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
The real definition has been skewed, the founding fathers were classical liberals, they’d be disgusted if they saw what modern liberalism is.
2019-02-18 17:00
2019-02-18 05:34
>socialist >libtard choose one
2019-02-18 05:39
I pick both you filthy socialist, libtard dictator!
2019-02-18 05:45
no you don't mate
2019-02-18 05:46
"Libertarian Socialist" That makes no sense , it should be Libertinage Socialism.
2019-02-18 09:14
Lithuania BalticCrux 
Bit of a libtardo squidwardo, aren't you?
2019-02-18 09:48
i would've killed myself if i would've been you
2019-02-18 16:59
"You were spekd as Centrist. You support a balance of economic and cultural freedom moderated with state-imposed restrictions on both. You oppose political changes which would shift society away from such a paradigm."
2019-02-18 04:23
2019-02-18 04:23
Yes, you are free to shit on street
2019-02-18 04:27
2019-02-18 04:28
2019-02-18 04:37
Turuk you again? Unemployment sucks amirite? Horrible page layout btw.
2019-02-18 04:26
United States Scvboy1 
I can't agree more
2019-02-18 04:31
United States Scvboy1 
Name, Coutnry, and website checks out.
2019-02-18 04:31
2019-02-18 04:33
You support a balance of economic freedom and restriction alongside light restrictions on cultural freedom. You oppose economic deregulation and any reduction in taxes.
2019-02-18 04:32
hey you're pretty smart
2019-02-18 07:06
shiiieettt that’s cool :D
2019-02-18 07:07
it's nice to know some people on HLTV have working brains
2019-02-18 10:08
you all have U.S. flags...maybe try this on reddit? you can circle jerk there without annoying me.
2019-02-18 16:35
you're the one complaining about people who don't think like you being visible to you. I think you're the echochamber circle jerker, dude.
2019-02-18 17:12
i do think a bit like these guys, i just threw up a little in my mouth when i saw them here jerking each other off in public.
2019-02-18 17:12
United States Burnzie 
2019-02-18 04:52
Canada Rubronegro Fuck communism and social democracy
2019-02-18 04:58
United Kingdom xTheDeadPixel 
Economic = -33 Cultural = -59 Libertarian Socialist
2019-02-18 05:08
congrats on the functioning brain
2019-02-18 05:23
Sweden WhisperingEye 
Typical "if someone doesn't agree with me they're stupid" That's what's wrong with this world. You can't think what you want anymore
2019-02-18 09:40
huh? there is overwhelming scientific evidence that conservatives are's been studied countless times at least going back to the 1920s. They're not stupid because they disagree with me, they disagree with me because they're stupid, which is demonstrable.
2019-02-18 09:57
Sweden WhisperingEye 
They're stupid according to you. Just because someone doesn't think like you doesn't mean they're stupid Stop with this bullshit. I'm a right winger, that doesn't make me stupid you faggot
2019-02-18 10:31
please l2 read. They're not stupid according to me, they're stupid according to science. Low intelligence and high fear response is what makes someone a conservative. I point out a fact about the results of scientific studies, and you come back with 'NO THEY'RE STUPID ACCORDING TO YOU!!!" For the second time too. You're basically just repeating yourself. Not surprising, as studies show conservatives have no low verbal ability too.
2019-02-18 11:05
First of all, stop trying to insult me. Second, show me those "scientific studies" And third, if conservatives are so stupid and libtards so smart, then why are right wing politicians so much smarter than left-wing politicians? You're brainwashed, I'm sorry for you. Being a conservative doesn't make you dumber than anyone else, for example: if a smart libtard suddenly becomes a conservative, do they suddenly lose all their intelligence? And btw, I don't have high fear response.
2019-02-18 15:12
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
Liberals love to use science these days because all the leftist lobbies have infested scientific organizations and have paid people off to advance their own agendas. Purposely picking a select closed group for a study which they know will give them the desired result is most likely what these people are doing. “Let’s find the dumbest hillbillies imaginable and post a study that condemns all conservatives to stupidity.”
2019-02-18 15:18
True! Hey, I actually found a smart person in this thread :D
2019-02-18 15:22
Nice conspiracy theory expected logic from a conservative - science disagrees with you, stick your head in the sand and pretend it's not real.
2019-02-18 15:48
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
Tell that to the American psychological association who is completely changing their agenda and pushing the “toxic masculinity” narrative. Lobbies have infected science.
2019-02-18 15:50
If you had a brain, you would know inventing conspiracy theories isn't an argument. The only way to attack a study is via it's methodology or its math. You haven't done either. Stop trying to change reality to make you feel better. Try logic for once.
2019-02-18 15:56
"show them to me" #107 "stop trying to insult me" "you faggot" oof n1 "Being a conservative doesn't make you dumber than anyone else" Except, it does. Facts don't change because of your feelings. #107. "why are right wing politicians so much smarter than left-wing politicians?" They aren't. You think they are because you're right-wing. It's called cognitive bias. The reality is they're far dumber - #107 "if a smart libtard suddenly becomes a conservative, do they suddenly lose all their intelligence?" There are so many things wrong with this... is this a bait? "I don't have a high fear response" yeah cuz I trust you I trust brain scans, not what you feel is true. So you claim me stating facts is insulting, while insulting me, assert liberal politicians are dumb, and assert you don't have a high fear response. Yeah, if you wanna disprove these studies, maybe don't behave exactly like they predict you would behave.
2019-02-18 15:55
Haha you're funny, well it doesn't matter what I say because you're brainwashed and stupid. I didn't call conservative politicians smart because I agree with them, I said it because it's true. Compare them to other leftist politicians and you'll see that it's true. Right wing politics WORK, left-wing politics DONT WORK. At least not here in Sweden. In sweden, the left has been in charge of the country for 5 years in a row now, and look at the country now, it's complete shit and it's just getting worse. That's because of the leftist government! The people you call smart ruin countries, while conservatives have to fix all the shit leftists make. Oh and what a nice argument you got, "yeah cuz I trust you, I trust brain scans, not what you feel is true" Ok so what I feel isn't true now either? And did you do brain scans on me? No exactly, I know more about myself than you do buddy :D Ben Shapiro is a right winger and he's really smart, he owns every single leftist that he argues against, wow leftists are so smart!! Just because someone doesn't think like you, you don't have to call them stupid or dumb, that's just what you and the rest of the brainwashed leftists think. And I'm not calling you stupid because you're a leftist, because I couldn't care less, it's a free world and you can like whatever you want. But you really are stupid.
2019-02-18 21:57
Brazil Karl_Tanner Economic 100 Cultural -65 Minarchist.
2019-02-18 05:12
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
First person in the replies with a functioning thought process - my respects.
2019-02-18 05:16
Brazil Karl_Tanner 
Thanks. This test is really good, because that's exactly what I am. The government should never intervene on economy and most social matters.
2019-02-18 05:32
Brazil BrazilNA 
Remenber that when you need to file a unemployment or retirement. Imagine you have to work your entire live and at 65, you have no retirement lol, thanks good there is a government in brazil who cares about the elderly thru taxation on markets Or stuff live maternity leave or sick days and vacation. If this kind of laws are not made by the state no company would care about the well being of its employees , thats why the state should intervene and demand some type of behavior from the market
2019-02-18 06:16
"when you need to file a unemployment or retirement" That made no sense.
2019-02-18 09:31
because you dont get to retire if the government doesnt intervene in the economy and social matters.
2019-02-18 16:36
That's just terribly wrong , in the vast majority of countries where the goverment takes care of retirement pension , including mine , SPECIALLY MINE (Argentina) , the purchasing power that you will get when you retire is much lower than the purchasing power you acumulate over the years when paying your retirement funds. In the end it would be much better if you saved your own money in the currency you wanted with no savings tax in a fixed bond and then have that money stacked when you hit the age where you want to retire , you'd make so much more purchasing power regardless of the nominal and 0 goverment required. Most people advocating for big goverment just have no clue what they're talking about "economy and social matters" cringe.
2019-02-18 23:25
yeah if people were capable of putting aside money instead of spending it all on shit they dont need then that would be great but people are not capable of that so we need government to take their money, stash it, and take their cut, or else most people will starve very soon after retiring.
2019-02-18 23:42
and if you give people the option to choose between pension fund and saving for themselves then a lot of irresponsible people are going to opt for save for themselves, not save anything, and then ask for a handout 30 years later because letting them starve for a mistake they made 30 years ago when they were young and stupid is inhumane. people who can bring up discipline to save money that they dont need to spend dont need government to do it for them, but those are in the minority, and those people can be succesful even if they have to pay a pension fund. the system wasnt made for you. anyway if the government didnt intervene in social matters then on your retiring day someone would shoot you and take all the money.
2019-02-18 23:46
"we need government to take their money, stash it, and take their cut, or else most people will starve very soon after retiring." No you dont , you WANT goverment to take their money because you think that goverment knows better, and if in the end the goverment scams the citizens hard (as it always happens) , you don't even have to take any responsibility since it was all goverment's fault. If you truly have 0 income after you retire , no kids , no helps you and you do TRULY need whatever paycheck the goverment decided you deserve because that is ALL you're gonna get , guess what , you're gonna starve to death too! , unless that on top of getting what you "saved" against your will theres money from tax payers to be added to that paycheck , but at that point , why even allow goverment to take from your salary when you're working?? if that's hows gonna be , you might as well just sign up for welfare once you retire and at least you didn't lose extra gunpoint taken money while you were working.
2019-02-18 23:48
you are seriously overestimating how much control people have over their lives
2019-02-18 23:55
I think you might be underestimating people's intelligence at least in first world countries.
2019-02-19 00:06
i live in one brah, its overrated
2019-02-19 00:06
Think about it this way: A) The way you propose , the hard strict and tough hand of the goverment taking money from workers against their will because it is "in their best interest" "you'll thank us later" , in the end , goverment reduces real net salary even more than what the worker is already paying in federal + state/province + MAYBE district taxes depending on what country you live in. What do they get?? in the end when they retire they get a miserable pension for the vast majority of jobs where the net purchasing power that they will get untill they die will never realistically match the total net purchasing power they lost in their working years. B) The way i propose , a lot of idiots will go bankrup and depend on their family after they retire , indeed , but at least that way they will actually learn about how to spend their money because of the real world , it would regulate itself , it is much better to have future generations knowing how to save for retirement than not knowing , getting their salaries nerfed (sometimes hugely nerfed depending on the country) and getting a miserable crap pension afterwards but telling them that they should be happy because someone else took care of it. Let them take responsibility for their actions , that's what freedom is all about , in order to have a higher roof you will by default have a lower floor.
2019-02-19 00:13
Brazil BrazilNA 
Let him advocate in favor of big companies and how much freedom they should have when hes never gonna be part of it. Just watch a movie called “puncture” and you will understand the devil behind big companies and monopolies, they are big enough to bribe politicians to get whatever they want, even the state sometimes cannot control it, the more money, more power you have, and guess what, we are the sheep and we always gonna be, what is crazy is to see people defending something they will never participate in lol
2019-02-19 07:49
The evil rich capitalists cannot bribe politicians that arent there , how can you not realize the loophole in your pathetic "argument" ???? in order for the corrupt business men to lobby power , there has to first be a corrupt politician capable of giving x favour to him , the more powerful the politicians are , the more favours they will hand out in corrupt exchanges , and if on top of that you have a BUNCH of politicians (big govermment) , even worse. You truly are the reason why Brasil is so bad nowadays , just the latino sheep leftist thinking , vote for lula and haddad , after all when their policies put brasil even below of the republic of the congo in ppp per capita, you can always blame The empire and capitalism... shame
2019-02-19 10:09
Brazil BrazilNA 
If you think corruption only happens in poors contries you are delusional, USA has the biggest scandals when it comes to big companies bying politicians thru what they call “donation” lol
2019-02-19 10:31
Brazil BrazilNA 
You cAn take as exemple here in usa the gun business, how much money they have put inpolitics and how much politician have their back because of this money, now think about big pharma, oil and natural gas industries lol, its hard to find a politician that has not received a contribution of interest
2019-02-19 10:40
1) "If you think corruption only happens in poors contries you are delusional" Where did i say that??? 2) Gun laws have no lobby power other than to keep the 2nd amendment alive , which should be an interest for all of the U.S American citizens , but sadly a bunch of ignorant leftists like you seem to think otherwise , you're trying to equal gun business and conglomerates with big pharma??? is that a joke??? Other than that you tried too hard to twist my words , you have no arguments , just some nonsense rethoric that sounds good in your head , i am backing out now because i know how will you continue to "defend" big goverment , social programs , redistribution of wealth , eventually protectionism etc etc etc. aint got the staminna to deal with more anti-capitalism clowns. Enjoy Bolsonaro , he will be your president for 4 sweet years manito.
2019-02-19 23:26
Brazil BrazilNA 
Big pharma and insurance companies are making the health system in USA a mess. They are putting so much money into politics to make their own laws on medicine price and insurance policies. Ask yourself why usa citizens spent 3 times more than Canadians to buy the same drugs. ask yourself why usa has one of the highest deductible in insurance ask yourself why if you have a pre-existing condition insurance can deny you service they have too much power to decide what to charge and who to service and now with trump cutting medicare and medicare the this companies never being so happier, sadly to those being fucked by high drug prices and high insurance cost. I don't live in Brazil, I couldn't care less about bolsonaro
2019-02-22 23:45
and yet 10/10 you can't explain why they shouldn't
2019-02-18 06:20
Just because people place differently on the political spectrum doesn't mean they can't think properly. Try being more open-minded to other people's opinions. Maybe you'll learn a thing or two.
2019-02-18 09:31
actually not true, he just has it backwards.
2019-02-18 11:04
Everyone has their reasons for what they choose to believe in. To say that one side doesn't have a functioning thought process is just wrong. They function differently, sure, but that's not a valid reason to discredit one side.
2019-02-18 11:12
scientific studies disagree, conservatives have low intellect and heightened fear response
2019-02-18 12:33
Doesn't mean they can't think properly, it just means that they think differently.
2019-02-18 12:44
the studies literally show they have lower IQ and extremely low general cognitive ability, analytic skills, problem solving, verbal ability, and mathematical skill as well as larger amygdalas and correspondingly are more emotional and have high fear responses to threat and change and are prone to anxiety. By any objective measure, this isn't just "different," it's worse. And it goes without saying they have much lower levels of education and score exceptionally low on tests of political knowledge. They also are found to be far more susceptible to the Dunning-Kruger effect (hence all the 'libtard' or 'liberalism is a mental disorder' nonsense) And all of this isn't just a few studies either, this is universally found to be the case.
2019-02-18 13:00
Could you link one of them? I'm just curious as to how the conducted their test and the results they got from them :) Since I'm not at all familiar with the subject at hand i'll keep it brief. Just because one group has a different way of thinking about certain subjects (thus coming to different conclusions) does not mean that their brains don't function properly. Using the claims you put forward (calling them claims because again, haven't read anything to validate those claims) does indicate that they have a lower IQ among other things. And the whole libtard and mental disorder thing they enjoy throwing around. It's most likely a way of disguising the fact that they simply cannot back up what they say with evidence, thus going for personal attacks and petty insults.
2019-02-18 13:24
Thanks! I'll give them a read when I get home from work. I know one source isn't enough, but when I ask for sources people tend to give me either no source at all, or a very clearly biased one. Thanks again :)
2019-02-18 14:08
2019-02-18 16:00
that some people are more emotional and have less verbal ability or whatever you want to measure doesnt mean that they arent capable of winning an election. if we wanted to have the smartest people in charge then would be the way society works, everyone takes a test and whoever scores the highest becomes president of their country and these guys get together and solve world poverty and hunger in a week, but thats not how it works now is it?
2019-02-18 16:41
2019-02-18 05:37 libertarian socialist Says I want to abolish the state, which isn't quite true. That's would be best theoretically in the future, but pragmatically don't see how it would work. But do you just spend all day trying to find these? You already know you're a fascist why do you keep searching for these? And btw, the best way to determine your political affiliation is two fold: 1. Test cognitive ability 2. Test fear response Low cognitive ability and high fear response have universally been shown to result in conservative beliefs. The idea that you're logically determining the truth of proposition is an illusion for you conservatives - you just lack the ability to proper analyze claims and are biologically predisposed to feel fear/anxiety when confronted with change or threats. Essentially, emotions rule your brain, not logic.
2019-02-18 05:20
Says the far left retard LMFAO. Yeah everyone is fascist if they don't follow your rules.
2019-02-18 05:30
and you're the perfect example of how conservatives have low cognitive ability totally incoherent response - take a few a minutes, or hours, or w.e it takes someone of your intellectual ability, and try again. It's truly astounding though, conservatives almost seem to possess super human abilities to densely pack nonsense. Two sentences, and you're able to not make sense in about a dozen different ways.
2019-02-18 06:18
Poland OkayAlright 
1/8 cause you baited one guy. Next time try to make the bait more realistic, because no one would believe you are that stupid and believe this stuff xd
2019-02-18 06:57
Don't confuse mental retardation with baiting. You can look up its past replies/posts.
2019-02-18 07:09
he's not baiting, he's serious when he says that rightists "have low cognitive ability". i remember him only because he replies like so on every argument, and when his opponent starts arguing he copypastes some links with comparisons of vote bases of reps and dems.
2019-02-18 09:10
Of course I'm serious, it's common knowledge rightists are less intelligent. And the scientific evidence for it is about as conclusive as science can be on any topic. The difference in intellectual capacities between liberals and rightists has been studied at least since the 1920s, with the same results going up to modern times.
2019-02-18 10:07
It's not true, you just interpret some researches very frivolously. The only correct conclusions from the links you always post are: 1) Racists and/or believers are less intelligent on a par; 2) Voters of Republican party are less intelligent on a par. It's not a secret that many people vote for Republicans because of their anti-immigrant, pro-life and pro-religious position, yes, it's their main audience, but there are plenty of other (and more logical) reasons why someone would vote for them and call himself "conservative" or "rightist". For example, views on freedom of speech, freedom of business and personal responsibility. I assure you that they will continue voting for Reps even if the GOP switches their social policy to pro-immigrant and pro-secular but leave unchanged their position on topics I listed. Furthermore, average intellect of a group of people is just a bad argument. Of course most of believers are less intelligent, but it doesn't prove that intellect of the Bishop of Rome, Ted Cruz or your random hltv opponent is lesser than yours. And even if so, it still doesn't prove that his believes are wrong and yours are right. It's very simple to think that your opponents are stupid, but please reconsider your conclusions and stop being so unkind.
2019-02-18 13:42
The only correct conclusions from the links you always post are: ) Racists and/or believers are less intelligent on a par; 2) Voters of Republican party are less intelligent on a par. Um, no, and that's not what the researchers concluded. You obviously didn't read them or didn't understand them, probably the former as their stated conclusions were rather clear. They concluded conservatism, authoritarianism, and social dominance are associated with lower intelligence. I didn't even link anything about racists before. Although other studies show conservatives display ALL psychopathic traits and narcissism and high fear of change and threats, all which help to explain racism. "views on freedom of speech" That's not associated with conservatism more than liberalism. In fact, it's more associated with liberal beliefs and brains. Conservative brains fear conflict, liberal brains don't and are better at processing conflicts and uncertainty - so they're more open to opposing speech. The hero of the left Noam Chomsky treats freedom of speech almost like it's sacred, even defending holocaust deniers on the grounds of freedom of speech. "average intellect of a group of people is just a bad argument....doesn't prove that intellect of the Bishop of Rome, Ted Cruz or your random hltv opponent" Never said it did. All I claimed is that statistically conservatives have lower intelligence and are more emotional, which is a fact. Of course it's theoretically possible for someone to be right-wing and more intelligent than someone on the left, it's just unlikely. "stop being so unkind." I see 'libtard' 'snowflake' 'liberalism is a mental illness' etc on a daily basis, all I'm saying is that science shows 'libtard' doesn't really make sense, as we're statistically much smarter. I wouldn't rub these studies in the faces of rightists if they weren't so hostile with 'mentally disabled libtard!' etc.
2019-02-18 14:24
if being dumb and socially dominant gets people more success than the leftists get from being smart, are you sure that its dumb to be that way? i think its pretty fucking clever. and if you think you are better than people who call you libtard then you shouldnt insult them back.
2019-02-18 16:47
another non-response. The amount of science that demonstrates conservatives are stupid is overwhelming. Sorry if facts scare you. I believe this stuff, because I believe science. Liberals don't stick their heads in the sand when scientific facts are inconvenient.
2019-02-18 10:04
Poland OkayAlright 
Thats why liberals think there is about 5000 genders when facts state there is 2. Also liberals are flat-earthers, and they believe that muslim a day will keep the sadness away. For a better race you guys are pretty retarded :)
2019-02-18 13:31
"Also liberals are flat-earthers" are you baiting or what? "facts state there is 2." Nope, science confirms gender is a spectrum (and basic logic). In fact, modern genetics shows sex is on a spectrum too. The real issue here is that conservatives literally fear change - their amygdalas are even larger. Their brain structures are such that change in existing 'order' - like gender roles - actually cause disgust and fear responses in their brains. Liberals have larger anterior cingulate cortex and do not care about authority or traditions.
2019-02-18 13:46
Poland OkayAlright 
Genetics show there is either XX or XY, not some braindead scrub saying they "dont have a gender" because they do, you are so stupid its scary, you are brainwashed and literally a libtard on the biggest level
2019-02-18 16:37
says there's only 2 genders I prove otherwise with peer reviewed papers says there's only 2 genders again and adds insults "you are so stupid its scary." Really, people like you shouldn't be allowed to vote. Stop trying to argue with people with 4x your IQ. Which is probably almost everyone. How do you even manage to tie your shoes?
2019-02-18 19:12
Oh and for more science you'll just ignore because all you care about is what you 'feel' to be true instead of facts, #107. Really shouldn't say 'libtard' when it's scientific fact that you're incredibly intellectually inferior to liberals.
2019-02-18 19:16
lots of social studies have serious issues with reliability, its more about which conclusion the researchers want to get than anything else. for example in the field of psychology: plus, something as culturally defined as gender cannot be narrowed down scientifically, because its more about what people believe than about physical characteristics. in some cultures there are only 2 genders and others are less strict about sex. for example ancient indian culture. youre trying too hard here
2019-02-18 16:54
he previously tried to reproduce 100 psychological experiments "published in three high-ranking psychology journals", and got even more ridiculous results.
2019-02-18 19:07
Did you even look at them? What you're saying isn't relevant here. These aren't 'social sciences,' it's brain scans. Rightists claim there's only 2 genders, and they have no argument for it, all they do is assert it's a 'mental illness' or a 'delusion.' Every single relevant scientific and medical body disagrees with this claim, the two studies I linked are brain imaging. They show they have different brain microstructures and gray matter differences. In other words, it shows you can have a brain that physically more closely resembles the gender they identify with than their birth sex. So it's not a delusion, or an illness, it's essentially a male brain in a female body or vice versa. Furthermore, the microstructures and gray matter volumes are not in discrete states, meaning there's a spectrum. You can have a neutral gendered brain, or male, or female, anywhere in between, irrespective of your birth sex. Also, rightists don't seem to understand that gender =/= sex. Or, more plausibly, refuse to understand that concept because it creates an obvious hole in their ideology. The last link is from nature, one of the most well respected journals in the world, explaining how sex is not just XX or XY, it's far more complicated than that.
2019-02-18 19:27
you cant see how smart someone is from a brain scan, i wish it were the case, i would be president then.
2019-02-18 23:41
And you just assumed I was a conservative, stereotypical brainwashed fool. I call them Cuckservative. When I attack their cuckolding ideologies, even leftards like you would jump on their "everyone is an antisemitic Nazi" train. Get lost weak-minded loser, you need a big daddy to give you everything.
2019-02-18 07:08
nice, you can't defend you're original claim so you shift the goal post. Classic technique of rightists. And nice ad hominems. Let me know if you ever grow up or learn to think. 2 comments so far with no content. Maybe third times the charm?
2019-02-18 10:04
> "you're a fascist" > "you're the perfect example of how conservatives have low cognitive ability" > "Classic technique of rightists" ... > "nice ad hominems" ok, nvm my reply in #102, you're just baiting
2019-02-18 13:46
fascism is an ideology, his results on earlier political affiliation tests labeled him a fascist.. it's not an ad hominem. He responded with nonsense, studies show rightists have low verbal ability... and he displayed that perfectly. Also not an ad hominem. Shifting the goal post is statistically a right-wing rhetorical technique. And this is expected - again, they demonstrably have lower political and general knowledge lower verbal ability and lower analytic skills - so they need to rely on rhetorical techniques and logical fallacies to FEEL like they win arguments. So, once again, not an ad hominem. Are you sure you know what an ad hominem is? It's only a formal logical fallacy if you say something like 'you are wrong BECAUSE you are ugly.'
2019-02-18 13:52
youre saying theyre wrong because theyre stupid which is basically the same thing
2019-02-18 19:10
No, I'm just saying rightists shouldn't go around saying 'libtard' and 'liberalism is a mental disorder' when it's demonstrable liberals are smarter.
2019-02-18 19:13
no youre doing the same thing
2019-02-18 23:40
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
lol. I know my political views, I just enjoy taking these tests.
2019-02-18 11:45
2019-02-18 05:34
Vote labor! liberals ruined NBN
2019-02-18 09:52
Japan Getp0x0st 
Shit test, how does wanting criminals to have to pay compensation to the state and or victim make me want less government control?
2019-02-18 05:43
Because in this case you don't want government money to compensate the victim. That's my guess...
2019-02-18 09:21
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
Having more government control would technically mean that forcing criminals to pay compensation would be more likely. When you look at wrongdoers paying back the wronged; you’ve always seen it throughout history, but it’s more prevalent in societies that have no government control, towns that rely on eachother living off the land. Anarchism.
2019-02-18 11:51
I wish I could unread your comment
2019-02-18 18:56
Japan Getp0x0st lol this is retarded
2019-02-18 05:51
so what are you, it doesnt say.
2019-02-18 05:54
Japan Getp0x0st 
i think it said liberal, i forgot
2019-02-18 05:55
rip lmao. What do you consider yourself?
2019-02-18 05:56
Japan Getp0x0st 
2019-02-18 06:02
that's not liberal... that's highly authoritarian/cuck
2019-02-18 06:13
Japan Getp0x0st 
Pretty sure the test said Liberal or something similar to it, I know it's authoritarian.
2019-02-18 06:21
there is no way it said that. It says right there 'heavy restrictions on cultural freedom'
2019-02-18 06:23
Japan Getp0x0st 
It is what it said, try and recreate my results I am lazy
2019-02-18 06:26
your result is the polar opposite of liberal, if it said that its most likely a bug also seeing that you are so authoritarian, why would you want the government controlling private relationships between two consenting people? i havent heard any solid arguments on that except "because god says everything is wrong"
2019-02-18 15:09
Japan Getp0x0st 
Yes I know, the test is shit. >why would you want the government controlling private relationships between two consenting people? Because gays are bad. Claims that gay parents are just as capable of raising children as straight parents are misrepresented. Source: Between 24% and 90% of lesbians report being psychologically abused by their partners. Source: Gay men are 60x more likely to have HIV than straight men. Source: 46% of male homosexuals report being molested, as compared to only 7% of heterosexual men. Source: Gays are more likely than straight people to have mental illness. Source: 1/4 gay men in America have had over 1000 sex partners. Source: 43% of gay men have over 500 partners. Source: Gay men are six times more likely to commit suicide than straight men. Source: Gay men are 12x more likely to use amphetamines than straight men. Source: Gay men are 10x more likely to use heroin than straight men. Source: Liberal arguments in favor of homosexuality are based on logical fallacies. Source: 10 to 15 percent of older homosexuals have more than 1000 sex partners. Source: Gay people are 2-3x more likely to abuse alcohol than straight people. Source: Up to 50% of lesbians have reported sexual abuse. Source: 79% of homosexual men say over half of their sex partners are strangers. Source: 99.8% of lesbian, gay and bisexual teens will change their sexual orientation within 13 years. Source: Two-thirds of men and women who were homosexual change their orientation to heterosexual five years later. Source: Two thirds of self-identified lesbians later have heterosexual relationships. Source: Identifying as lesbian, gay or bisexual does not end sexual questioning or confusion. Source: One in eight gay men in London has HIV. Source: Gay men are twice as likely as straight men to be in interracial relationships. Source: In Australia, 25% of homosexuals have had more than 100 sex partners. Source: Gay men, who are 1.65% of the US population, account for 63% of the country’s syphilis cases. Source: In 2010, homosexuals were about 200 times more likely than everyone else to be diagnosed with HIV. Source: Gay men are 15 times more likely to have Hepatitis B than everyone else. Source: Homosexuals are more to use illegal drugs and drink to excess than straight people. Source: Homosexuals are more likely than straight people to have anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, and to commit suicide. Source: Gay men are 10-15 times more likely than straight men to have eating disorders. Source: 40% to 60% of serial killers are homosexuals. Source: Homosexual men are more likely to have been abused by their partners than straight men. Source: Monogamy is not a central feature of most homosexual relationships. Source: Married homosexual men are 50% more likely than straight couples to divorce. Source: In the Netherlands, the average homosexual in a “steady relationship” has seven to eight affairs per year. Source: Over 20% of older homosexuals have had more than 500 different sex partners. Source: The average gay man has several dozen sex partners per year. Source: 28% of homosexuals have had sex with over a thousand men. For straight men? Just 25% have had sex with more than 10 women. Source: Most “long term relationships” between gay men last less than eight years. Source: Among gay Canadian men in “committed relationships, only 25% were monogamous. Source: In one study, only 9% of gay men were monogamous. Source: 75% of straight men an are faithful, compared to just 4.5% of gay men. Source: In Berlin, 83% of gay men in “steady” relationships had had frequent affairs in the last year. Source: Infection rates for gonorrhea and chlamydia are increasing among active homosexual men. Source: Gay men, 1% of the population, account for 83% of syphilis cases. Source: Syphilis was almost eradicated, but made a comeback among homosexual men. Source: Active homosexual men are 17 times more likely than straight people to have anal cancer. Source: Lesbians are 2.5x more likely than straight women to be obese. Source: Lesbians are twice as likely as straight women to have eating disorders. Source: Lesbians are twice as likely as straight women to be stalked or physically abused by their partners. Source: Married lesbians are 2-3 times more likely to divorce than straight couples. Source: Homosexuals, lesbians, and transsexuals are poorer than straight people. Source: America has spent $700 million promoting gay rights abroad – an “integral” part of American foreign policy. Source:
2019-02-18 21:26
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” - John Adams
2019-02-18 21:27
Fair enough tho you could argue that most of these are how they are because of how society treats gay people
2019-02-18 21:44
Japan Getp0x0st 
You think homosexuals being serial killers at a far higher rate is solely because of they're treated, in-spite of the fact that LGBT are treated quite well in the west now.
2019-02-19 03:21
United States litdabber21 
gays are bad because they are poor and have illness
2019-02-19 03:37
Japan Getp0x0st 
this but unironically
2019-02-19 03:43
United States litdabber21 
yeah i think that gays do not have access to AirPods due to financial contraints
2019-02-19 03:44
f0rest | 
Argentina Nawll 
im fucking retarded i did half of the questions and then realised i was voting exact opposite of what i belived lol, im too lazy to do it agane
2019-02-18 08:59
Turkey orox2 
Lemme tell the result: Laziness: 100 Retard: 100 You are a neutral fag who has no idea what is going on
2019-02-18 10:25
f0rest | 
Argentina Nawll 
Sure whatever you say bruv
2019-02-18 21:14
Lithuania BalticCrux 
2019-02-18 09:42
too long test fuck it
2019-02-18 10:15
Economic: -4 Cultural: -33 "You were spekd as liberal." Well the result was authoritarian left when i did the test on Political Compass, so i dont think they are accurate. I would consider myself as an individualist more than a liberal tho.
2019-02-18 11:04
Brazil xhrp 
almost the same , economic: -2, cultural: -29
2019-02-18 16:51
Brazil xhrp 
almost the same , economic: -2, cultural: -29
2019-02-18 16:51
-14 economic -14 cultural Centrist
2019-02-18 14:18
-46 Economic -48 Cultural Libertarian socialist
2019-02-18 14:39
There are a few grammatical mistakes in the text. Lots of vague questions. Lots of complicated questions that should not be asked with a 1-5 answer. -32 eco -38 cultural I am not that economically restrictive.
2019-02-18 14:52
2019-02-18 14:53
Finland Emvi 
84 Economic -66 Cultural "You were spekd as libertarian capitalist"
2019-02-18 15:02
Economic: 31 Cultural: -24 “You were spekd as conservative”
2019-02-18 15:42
Poland insomnia_ 
2019-02-18 16:21
Slovakia t4gg3d 
Economic : -1 Cultural : -37 You were spekd as liberal OH NO I'M A LIBTARD For real tho, it's super inaccurate, I'm definetely not liberal.
2019-02-18 17:11
Brazil syncme 
Economic: 34 Cultural: -52 You were spekd as libertarian capitalist. You support light restrictions on both economic and cultural freedom. You oppose increased economic regulations and the abolition of the state.
2019-02-18 17:17
2019-02-18 17:39
ANGE1 | 
Russia ultnie 
Economic: 59 Cultural: -59 Well, I can see in my country that private medicine and such have much better quality and doctors actually paid more (oh, wow, how is that possible if stupid businesses only what to rob their workers? Guess Russia is fucked up (sarcasm, partly, because still fucked up, but not in that sense)) than government, so I know my shit on practice, same goes for schools, by the way. Cultural, well, I don't think I need to say anything here. Freedom of speech all the way and people are free to believe whatever they want unless they make others join it almost by force or make some kind of difficulties to society. And I don't understand the concept of "government controlling the culture", if it would be possible, there wouldn't be any revolutions in history, isn't it? But maybe I'm understanding that wrong, correct me if I am. There was another test with 117 questions that wasn't actually showing your progress and had much more scales, I liked it more since it was harder to get the desired result, so you were actually stating your opinion and not "dot changing position, but I think I should be here, so I'll change something", I'm sure some people were doing that. P.S.: Searched it while was writing it, here it is. And all of these tests always from an American point of view. For example, how can a person from Aphganistan answer a question about government acting as world police? It is easy to understand that it is about the American one, but there's almost no way he supports it.
2019-02-18 18:28
SS | 
Japan NotTrik 
Yes I am aware of the other test, I enjoy tests with a lot of questions because it can balance out more extreme results that come from tests that have a small amount of questions. I made a thread with it:
2019-02-18 19:13
Economic -92 Cultural -100 Anarcho Communist accurate
2019-02-18 18:33
Japan Getp0x0st 
>Anarcho Communist couldve just said retarded
2019-02-19 03:30
United Kingdom Breezeeh 
2019-02-18 18:58
I had done about 80% of the test and suddenly i realize the right side is dislike.. instead of like i did the entire test wrong
2019-02-18 19:07
France 0racle 
compass made for american standards
2019-02-18 19:12
Argentina ivanpb 
I'm with you bro
2019-02-19 06:18
Economic:48 Cultural:17 Conservative
2019-02-18 22:23
United Kingdom Lcheste3 
49 -52 Libertarian capitalist ez clap Anyone who is a centrist can bugger off As long as you are liberal you are cool dood
2019-02-19 00:39
Liberalism is cancer. It ended the great nations and put them at rest. Yours is not an exception. Sometime ago the UK was the epitome of fashion and style. How time slips away.
2019-02-19 05:30
2019-02-19 03:44
econ 11 culture -58 liberal
2019-02-19 04:07
Centrist. -16 economics, 3 cultural. But I doubt its validity really. I don't see myself in the middle, I'm on either side.
2019-02-19 05:29
United States zer0skill Pretty accurate imo, all I care about is low taxes and as little government regulation as possible
2019-02-19 06:05
Argentina ivanpb 
2019-02-19 06:09
Europe hltv007 
didnt open for me-it shows me just beta dev
2019-02-19 10:40
United States freiheit 
libertarian capitalist
2019-02-23 00:18
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.