Thread has been deleted
Last comment
REACTION TIME
Argentina bedshitter 
prntscr.com/mn431k this is my reaction time on average. is it good? 60 hz btw humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime
2019-02-19 11:55
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
14 replies
thats insane actually. r u playing on a 144hz monitor?
2019-02-19 11:58
13 replies
yeah
2019-02-19 11:58
gyazo.com/c444b8a56cfb2dc9b43256dd681ac5.. got a better one with a few more tries
2019-02-19 11:59
8 replies
what the fuck?
2019-02-19 11:59
7 replies
humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime/le.. lmao i made an account and got to #56 on the leaderboard
2019-02-19 12:04
5 replies
lol I get arround 220(something between 210 and 230 most of the time) but I gambled a bit got an insane time lmao, I just guessed when it would turn green and got it almost perfectly :P puu.sh/COwAs/7c7e7b5e52.png
2019-02-19 12:16
1 reply
its the average that counts :)
2019-02-19 15:27
input lag is a big factor here, you want a good mouse with little inputlag, a fast monitor (not even all 144 are the same) and a solid system. getting 190 without even trying, but keep in mind that i have low input lag components edit: wanted to reply to the guy above u imgur.com/a/moJE3BX
2019-02-19 15:32
2 replies
60hz vs 144hz monitor is 10-15ms difference depending on the response time but your mouse should only add 1ms if you have 1000hz polling rate and PC shouldnt add more than a couple of ms if everything is working correctly.
2019-02-19 16:03
1 reply
it's internal signaling within the mouse, not only polling rate of the USB standard. if you are interested in the topic you can google it, popular mices vary wildly in regards of inputlag, with >40ms differences
2019-02-19 18:04
2019-12-14 12:14
imgur.com/a/s0T6WpP pretty easy when you build a system around low input lag - mouse, monitor (aoc g2460pf) and.. amd 2200g lol. 2nd attempt
2019-02-19 15:29
2 replies
i have a shit pc and some generic samsung monitor, but i still dont think it has so much of an impact in my results. im just slow.
2019-02-19 15:41
1 reply
Yes, it has and fucking much, I get like 160 ms with g203 and 180 with zowie divina s2 on a 75hz monitor, 190ms is not even something impressive for that reaction time test
2019-12-14 08:10
Mine is 1ms
2019-02-19 11:57
1 reply
legend
2019-02-19 12:32
This is the best one I got: puu.sh/COwrM/6deb039119.png I had one running for some seconds so average is messed up
2019-02-19 12:08
2 replies
The average is kinda needed because 96 ms is obviously prefired.
2019-02-19 15:13
yeah sure xD
2019-02-19 15:20
#10
 | 
Finland Finhammer
I think under 200 ms is average for a young gamer, I had average 190ish few years back when I did this test
2019-02-19 12:19
11 replies
You'd be surprised how slow some people's reaction times are.
2019-02-19 12:22
1 reply
like me
2019-02-20 02:01
Around 180-200 sounds right.
2019-02-19 12:24
then im fucking shit my man
2019-02-19 15:08
1 reply
lmao me too kkkkkk 260 the best and im a pretty good awper.
2019-02-19 15:15
the average is 200-250
2019-02-19 15:27
#75
ckN | 
Japan ckN
how old are you?
2019-02-19 18:08
4 replies
#78
 | 
Finland Finhammer
22
2019-02-19 18:19
3 replies
#79
ckN | 
Japan ckN
so you consider yourself as old?:D
2019-02-19 18:19
2 replies
#82
 | 
Finland Finhammer
I never said that, and I didn’t mean to imply it either. But I was 18 when I was hardcore gamer and back then my reaction time was at my best.
2019-02-19 18:22
1 reply
#116
 | 
United States soondead
this i remember like years ago i tried same test i had like 165 average and i was gamer af now my average 190
2019-12-14 09:41
This test is not realistic. In-game you react way faster
2019-02-19 12:23
3 replies
In the game you hear steps/flashes and such so u don't really react. You hear a step and know you have to click the mouse 500 ms later.
2019-02-19 12:41
+1
2019-02-19 15:24
I have slow reaction time in this test (250 on a good day) and I am slower than my friends in game as well. It's not the absolute value but how you compare with the rest.
2019-02-19 18:32
2019-02-19 12:28
#15
 | 
Slovakia ywix
wtf on phone i have something like 379...what a nub
2019-02-19 12:31
1 reply
yeah, you should try it on the pc to get real results
2019-02-19 15:10
Does your screen and mouse's input lag affect this? Cause I get like fucking 290-300 ms. But again I'm not the healthiest person :D
2019-02-19 15:14
7 replies
yes it does. how old are you?
2019-02-19 15:15
3 replies
16
2019-02-19 15:16
2 replies
u have the reaction time of a fucking sloth my dude
2019-02-19 15:17
1 reply
I react way faster in game man. The problem is my spray control :D
2019-02-19 15:18
Not in a significant matter. I remember when I was very young I got around 300ms every try. In the last few years I've gotten much better hence #24.
2019-02-19 15:16
2 replies
Well I currently have a TV as my monitor and some 6$ mouse?
2019-02-19 15:17
1 reply
i don't know about the mouse, but having a tv as a monitor definitely affects your results
2019-02-19 15:39
#27
 | 
Japan hirohito
imgur.com/a/Zs7AngD still, i haven't played cs for almost a year so i was pretty shockedXD
2019-02-19 15:16
would like to see the awpers result on this test, also xantares
2019-02-19 15:16
4 replies
I would argue that an awpers result wouldn't even be significantly lower than a normal players since awping is so much more than just reacting to a shot.
2019-02-19 15:18
3 replies
but if you're holding a tight angle, you are far more likely to hit the shot with faster reaction times
2019-02-19 15:20
2 replies
Yea ofc. But still I don't think that reaction time is that significant of an ability that determines the awpers skill. Most likely an awper with a 5ms lower reaction time would still perform at the same level. Also the only awper I really feel like has been known for their raw speed is kennyS in ~2014.
2019-02-19 15:23
1 reply
yeah but i think they practice it, you can improve reaction times, that's why I think awpers have better reaction time..
2019-02-19 15:30
180ms average too lazy to make screenshot 60hz, I believe kennys had like 160 or smth
2019-02-19 15:17
i.imgur.com/L7X7l4p.png waddup That one aside, I'm averaging about 220, even though I'm using a 4 years old 200€ Laptop, if that means anything
2019-02-19 15:18
prntscr.com/mn7f48 Was my first try on a 144Hz screen. I am impressed myself.
2019-02-19 15:20
210 average, but maybe year before my best ones were around 240 now it is 180, so at least I'm improving.
2019-02-19 15:23
#41
 | 
Portugal astacp
best result 120ms 60hz and 5$ mouse average around 200ms
2019-02-19 15:23
the slow reaction timers not posting lol, the average is around 200-260 @60hz guys dont worry if you have higher than those posted here. Mine is around 210 at 60hz and the fk1 edit: did the test in the steam browser when i gto 210 average, just tried on a normal browser and was consistently hitting around 195 so i guess it has some kind of a delay just so you know if u wanna try, do it on a normal browser
2019-02-19 15:33
I am in my forties, so I guess I am excused for being a tad slow imgur.com/a/w5bTjIZ 181ms, 5 tries 186ms, 25 tries
2019-02-19 15:27
1 reply
Ok boomer
2019-12-14 08:14
230ms average
2019-02-19 15:30
2 replies
how old r u?
2019-02-19 15:31
1 reply
16 xd
2019-02-20 00:43
I am 20 and have very good equipment. Yet my avg reaction time is like 235 ms. WTF.
2019-02-19 15:31
4 replies
2019-02-19 15:33
3 replies
I have good graphics card and 240 hz. I should really be getting around 200ms.
2019-02-19 15:34
2 replies
youre around the average, maybe slightly higher, 240 doesnt do much difference compared to 144. Anyway for cs it isnt that important, for some playstyles and awpers it is though. N0thing for example said that he has higher than average and that the pros are around average too and that it isnt that important in most situations
2019-02-19 15:42
There are lots of factors in this test for example your mice,screen,internet and the server location
2019-02-19 18:01
Considering I had like 210 average like a year ago I'm proud gyazo.com/8ee4977beeffb7f1dccbd5c61d27c9..
2019-02-19 15:31
#56
 | 
Brazil BrenoCKO
imgur.com/a/MakNfw0 69 Ms in 1 try
2019-02-19 15:35
2 replies
lol
2019-02-19 17:59
gz on prefiring
2019-02-19 18:02
#63
 | 
United Kingdom munt_
2019-02-19 15:42
#66
 | 
Luxembourg @Trik
nt
2019-02-19 16:04
#67
byali | 
Poland jap0n
190-200
2019-02-19 16:05
I am blaming the bad servers imgur.com/a/jS9GYQ2
2019-02-19 17:59
2019-02-19 18:03
2019-02-19 18:09
i had about 170ms reaction time back when i played competitively, but i got slower and its trigger me. 220ms avg. (shit components tho and very tired, but fck im disappointed in myself.)
2019-02-19 18:11
#80
 | 
Malaysia Suno[t]
259ms avg :(
2019-02-19 18:21
#81
 | 
China Uyghur
Yes
2019-02-19 18:21
205 here, between 185 and 230.
2019-02-19 18:23
#84
 | 
Finland Emvi
gyazo.com/64cedf58de640d97f01bcce9bc6a4e.. 10 tries for more accuracy 194 average
2019-02-19 18:24
based on luck than real reaction time lul ( always 4th or 5th second turn on green ) once by accident i had 97ms but average is 175-190
2019-02-19 18:30
I get 250 on a good day :( But slow reactions can be worked around in game :)
2019-02-19 18:35
mine is 300ms :( miss really easy awp shots because of that :(
2019-02-20 00:46
i.imgur.com/PACNtoa.png Ez I'm quite tired right now so I'm only around 170-190ms, usually earlier on I'm around the time of my pic above
2019-02-20 00:52
#91
 | 
Nigeria Asbhdhsbs
Wtf 300 on phone
2019-02-20 01:02
1 reply
repeat on proper hardware, touchscreens can be quite sluggish. expect 200-300 @ 60hz. in good mental state and with low input lag hardware, getting under 200ms average is possible, but only for some people.
2019-02-20 01:54
normal human reaction time I believe is between 150-300 ms, depending on the state you are in. usually the younger you are the quicker you can react, but heightened mental state (like fear / fight or flight response, survival instinct, adrenaline rush, drugs, etc.) can also alter the normal values. there are some people who can get an average significantly below the normal, most commonly in occupations that require fast reactions, like athletes, pilots, racing drivers, etc. but not exclusively. I noticed I can get under 200ms when I am hungry, while averaging 250-300ms after dinner (all 60hz display and 125hz USB). I will repeat the test once I have my 144hz asus and I will also overclock USB to check how much of a difference that makes (internal MLT04 sensor of my MS Intelli Explorer 3.0 can go up to 9000fps)
2019-02-20 01:46
317 avarage wtf am i some retired elderly i used laptops touchpad btw
2019-02-20 02:05
1 reply
and 4 am local time
2019-02-20 02:08
Average 347 Ms (on phone though)
2019-12-14 08:16
It depends on computer's input lag. I socred ~140ms on average with my gaming conputer. I've optimized my computer to have minimum input lag as possible as i can(such as memory timing, irq scheduling, priority, affinity etc) But with my lab computer, i only score ~220ms on average. Get a decent intel cpu and decent motherboard. Never buy amd cpu and asus mainboard if you want faster reaction. Both have dpc latency problems.
2019-12-14 08:36
5 replies
What main board do you use.
2019-12-14 08:57
4 replies
I use msi but tbh other than asus it will be fine
2019-12-14 09:56
3 replies
Interesting, I'm only asking because I'm going to build a new PC, what are you basing this off?
2019-12-14 11:25
2 replies
Personal experience, benchmark results from tech forums. I had used asus b360 board before, and suffered random dpc latency spikes. It wasnt only me. Also, ryzen had higher latency than Intel cpu all the time. Even at 3000's. Thats why audio engineers only use intel cpu(their job is highly sensitive with latencies) If you are not doing anything that is running on real-time process(such as game, audio production), you dont need to care about this. Amd or asus will function nomally. But definetly you will play csgo on new pc so
2019-12-14 11:55
1 reply
Thanks for that.
2019-12-14 12:00
2019-12-14 08:29
i avg 280-300ms on 60hz laptop
2019-12-14 08:33
450 average mens)))
2019-12-14 08:34
I'm nearing on the 30 and I average 180.
2019-12-14 08:37
gyazo.com/98d396b696c91e6de2ab93a9221913.. age 23 not sure if its good i was up for like 18 hours though!
2019-12-14 08:37
#106
 | 
Georgia Broozman
200
2019-12-14 08:41
when did you get unbanned agus?
2019-12-14 08:57
i have 220 with 60hz, even tho i have high rank(gold nova3)
2019-12-14 09:01
2200ms IS THAT GOOD?
2019-12-14 09:03
avg 162
2019-12-14 09:05
1 reply
did it again and got 166ms avg in 5 tries and i just woke up
2019-12-14 09:42
Im 28 and this was mine :/ imgur.com/a/K8nZ3Jh
2019-12-14 09:13
i suck at this but im pretty good at memorizing numbers
2019-12-14 09:34
#115
 | 
Europe obvious
199ms is like average Mine is 165-175ms
2019-12-14 09:36
#117
 | 
Czech Republic Ondron
165 avg with 144hz
2019-12-14 09:41
I did 182 but prefired one and did 8ms response latency so that pushed my time way down, otherwise I am slow af..
2019-12-14 09:42
testing reaction time while moving your mouse as if you were aiming is slower
2019-12-14 09:45
#121
 | 
Europe skharppi
i.imgur.com/hc9yqoQ.png "yOuR rEfLeXeS dEcAy AfTeR 25yO" best regards, 30 years old
2019-12-14 09:45
1 reply
I don't know what people do to claim that their reaction time decays so much in their 20s...honestly. imgur.com/a/z4kKxhB 31 yrs old.
2019-12-14 12:13
#122
 | 
Europe MaHoTei
169 avg on good days 160
2019-12-14 09:48
2019-12-14 11:35
189
2019-12-14 11:51
Avg 150-160 on 60hz prnt.sc/qapykd prnt.sc/qapyt0
2019-12-14 12:11
insignificant test because people just try and try again and then post their results here, lol I hover between 185-200ms usually
2019-12-14 12:17
#133
 | 
Kazakhstan Tripper^^
236ms
2019-12-14 12:18
Copenhagen Flames
1.56
Izako Boars
2.34
1WIN
1.43
Cyber Legacy
2.82
ORDER
1.49
AVANT
2.53
Bet value
Amount of money to be placed
Winning
Odds total ratio
-
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.