Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Argentina bedshitter this is my reaction time on average. is it good? 60 hz btw
2019-02-19 11:55
thats insane actually. r u playing on a 144hz monitor?
2019-02-19 11:58
Finland hltv_pc_expert 
2019-02-19 11:58
Finland hltv_pc_expert got a better one with a few more tries
2019-02-19 11:59
what the fuck?
2019-02-19 11:59
Finland hltv_pc_expert lmao i made an account and got to #56 on the leaderboard
2019-02-19 12:04
lol I get arround 220(something between 210 and 230 most of the time) but I gambled a bit got an insane time lmao, I just guessed when it would turn green and got it almost perfectly :P
2019-02-19 12:16
its the average that counts :)
2019-02-19 15:27
Germany pmb  
input lag is a big factor here, you want a good mouse with little inputlag, a fast monitor (not even all 144 are the same) and a solid system. getting 190 without even trying, but keep in mind that i have low input lag components edit: wanted to reply to the guy above u
2019-02-19 15:32
60hz vs 144hz monitor is 10-15ms difference depending on the response time but your mouse should only add 1ms if you have 1000hz polling rate and PC shouldnt add more than a couple of ms if everything is working correctly.
2019-02-19 16:03
Germany pmb  
it's internal signaling within the mouse, not only polling rate of the USB standard. if you are interested in the topic you can google it, popular mices vary wildly in regards of inputlag, with >40ms differences
2019-02-19 18:04
Germany pmb pretty easy when you build a system around low input lag - mouse, monitor (aoc g2460pf) and.. amd 2200g lol. 2nd attempt
2019-02-19 15:29
i have a shit pc and some generic samsung monitor, but i still dont think it has so much of an impact in my results. im just slow.
2019-02-19 15:41
Mine is 1ms
2019-02-19 11:57
2019-02-19 12:32
This is the best one I got: I had one running for some seconds so average is messed up
2019-02-19 12:08
The average is kinda needed because 96 ms is obviously prefired.
2019-02-19 15:13
yeah sure xD
2019-02-19 15:20
I think under 200 ms is average for a young gamer, I had average 190ish few years back when I did this test
2019-02-19 12:19
United Kingdom BionicRick 
You'd be surprised how slow some people's reaction times are.
2019-02-19 12:22
Brazil user2740 
like me
2019-02-20 02:01
United Kingdom Areashi 
Around 180-200 sounds right.
2019-02-19 12:24
then im fucking shit my man
2019-02-19 15:08
lmao me too kkkkkk 260 the best and im a pretty good awper.
2019-02-19 15:15
the average is 200-250
2019-02-19 15:27
ckN | 
Estonia ckN 
how old are you?
2019-02-19 18:08
2019-02-19 18:19
ckN | 
Estonia ckN 
so you consider yourself as old?:D
2019-02-19 18:19
I never said that, and I didn’t mean to imply it either. But I was 18 when I was hardcore gamer and back then my reaction time was at my best.
2019-02-19 18:22
This test is not realistic. In-game you react way faster
2019-02-19 12:23
In the game you hear steps/flashes and such so u don't really react. You hear a step and know you have to click the mouse 500 ms later.
2019-02-19 12:41
United States BLNDSPT 
2019-02-19 15:24
I have slow reaction time in this test (250 on a good day) and I am slower than my friends in game as well. It's not the absolute value but how you compare with the rest.
2019-02-19 18:32
Liechtenstein parish 
2019-02-19 12:28
Slovakia ywix 
wtf on phone i have something like 379...what a nub
2019-02-19 12:31
yeah, you should try it on the pc to get real results
2019-02-19 15:10
Does your screen and mouse's input lag affect this? Cause I get like fucking 290-300 ms. But again I'm not the healthiest person :D
2019-02-19 15:14
yes it does. how old are you?
2019-02-19 15:15
2019-02-19 15:16
u have the reaction time of a fucking sloth my dude
2019-02-19 15:17
I react way faster in game man. The problem is my spray control :D
2019-02-19 15:18
Not in a significant matter. I remember when I was very young I got around 300ms every try. In the last few years I've gotten much better hence #24.
2019-02-19 15:16
Well I currently have a TV as my monitor and some 6$ mouse?
2019-02-19 15:17
i don't know about the mouse, but having a tv as a monitor definitely affects your results
2019-02-19 15:39 still, i haven't played cs for almost a year so i was pretty shockedXD
2019-02-19 15:16
would like to see the awpers result on this test, also xantares
2019-02-19 15:16
I would argue that an awpers result wouldn't even be significantly lower than a normal players since awping is so much more than just reacting to a shot.
2019-02-19 15:18
but if you're holding a tight angle, you are far more likely to hit the shot with faster reaction times
2019-02-19 15:20
Yea ofc. But still I don't think that reaction time is that significant of an ability that determines the awpers skill. Most likely an awper with a 5ms lower reaction time would still perform at the same level. Also the only awper I really feel like has been known for their raw speed is kennyS in ~2014.
2019-02-19 15:23
yeah but i think they practice it, you can improve reaction times, that's why I think awpers have better reaction time..
2019-02-19 15:30
180ms average too lazy to make screenshot 60hz, I believe kennys had like 160 or smth
2019-02-19 15:17
flusha | 
Germany Kupferr waddup That one aside, I'm averaging about 220, even though I'm using a 4 years old 200€ Laptop, if that means anything
2019-02-19 15:18 Was my first try on a 144Hz screen. I am impressed myself.
2019-02-19 15:20
Twistzz | 
Lithuania Sheikl 
210 average, but maybe year before my best ones were around 240 now it is 180, so at least I'm improving.
2019-02-19 15:23
Portugal astacp 
best result 120ms 60hz and 5$ mouse average around 200ms
2019-02-19 15:23
shox | 
Serbia ravi0ll1 
the slow reaction timers not posting lol, the average is around 200-260 @60hz guys dont worry if you have higher than those posted here. Mine is around 210 at 60hz and the fk1 edit: did the test in the steam browser when i gto 210 average, just tried on a normal browser and was consistently hitting around 195 so i guess it has some kind of a delay just so you know if u wanna try, do it on a normal browser
2019-02-19 15:33
I am in my forties, so I guess I am excused for being a tad slow 181ms, 5 tries 186ms, 25 tries
2019-02-19 15:27
230ms average
2019-02-19 15:30
how old r u?
2019-02-19 15:31
16 xd
2019-02-20 00:43
I am 20 and have very good equipment. Yet my avg reaction time is like 235 ms. WTF.
2019-02-19 15:31
shox | 
Serbia ravi0ll1 
2019-02-19 15:33
I have good graphics card and 240 hz. I should really be getting around 200ms.
2019-02-19 15:34
shox | 
Serbia ravi0ll1 
youre around the average, maybe slightly higher, 240 doesnt do much difference compared to 144. Anyway for cs it isnt that important, for some playstyles and awpers it is though. N0thing for example said that he has higher than average and that the pros are around average too and that it isnt that important in most situations
2019-02-19 15:42
There are lots of factors in this test for example your mice,screen,internet and the server location
2019-02-19 18:01
Considering I had like 210 average like a year ago I'm proud
2019-02-19 15:31
Brazil MybR 69 Ms in 1 try
2019-02-19 15:35
2019-02-19 17:59
gz on prefiring
2019-02-19 18:02
United Kingdom munt_ 
2019-02-19 15:42
Luxembourg @Trik 
2019-02-19 16:04
byali | 
Poland jap0n 
2019-02-19 16:05
I am blaming the bad servers
2019-02-19 17:59
2019-02-19 18:03
2019-02-19 18:09
i had about 170ms reaction time back when i played competitively, but i got slower and its trigger me. 220ms avg. (shit components tho and very tired, but fck im disappointed in myself.)
2019-02-19 18:11
259ms avg :(
2019-02-19 18:21
China Uyghur 
2019-02-19 18:21
205 here, between 185 and 230.
2019-02-19 18:23
Finland Emvi 10 tries for more accuracy 194 average
2019-02-19 18:24
Poland topkek233 
based on luck than real reaction time lul ( always 4th or 5th second turn on green ) once by accident i had 97ms but average is 175-190
2019-02-19 18:30
I get 250 on a good day :( But slow reactions can be worked around in game :)
2019-02-19 18:35
mine is 300ms :( miss really easy awp shots because of that :(
2019-02-20 00:46 Ez I'm quite tired right now so I'm only around 170-190ms, usually earlier on I'm around the time of my pic above
2019-02-20 00:52
Australia Hythro 
Wtf 300 on phone
2019-02-20 01:02
repeat on proper hardware, touchscreens can be quite sluggish. expect 200-300 @ 60hz. in good mental state and with low input lag hardware, getting under 200ms average is possible, but only for some people.
2019-02-20 01:54
normal human reaction time I believe is between 150-300 ms, depending on the state you are in. usually the younger you are the quicker you can react, but heightened mental state (like fear / fight or flight response, survival instinct, adrenaline rush, drugs, etc.) can also alter the normal values. there are some people who can get an average significantly below the normal, most commonly in occupations that require fast reactions, like athletes, pilots, racing drivers, etc. but not exclusively. I noticed I can get under 200ms when I am hungry, while averaging 250-300ms after dinner (all 60hz display and 125hz USB). I will repeat the test once I have my 144hz asus and I will also overclock USB to check how much of a difference that makes (internal MLT04 sensor of my MS Intelli Explorer 3.0 can go up to 9000fps)
2019-02-20 01:46
Turkey Kebapmaster 
317 avarage wtf am i some retired elderly i used laptops touchpad btw
2019-02-20 02:05
Turkey Kebapmaster 
and 4 am local time
2019-02-20 02:08
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.