Thread has been deleted
Last comment
$3300 is cheap
 | 
Other VladimirLucas 
you heard it here first, aug will be nerfed to $3500 after devs realize they failed csgo dev team is so funny, they think $3300 is the reason pros didn't play aug before, they didn't play it because they didn't want to learn new gun, now all pros know aug and will still buy it, $150 is tiny difference learn from 1.6/css i.imgur.com/f7hVKod.jpg
2019-03-14 09:02
#1
 | 
Jordan xrealx369 
3500$?
2019-03-14 09:03
#3
 | 
Other VladimirLucas 
$3500
2019-03-14 09:04
3500$
2019-03-14 09:16
$3500
2019-03-14 09:23
#18
 | 
Slovakia AdorrioN 
3500$
2019-03-14 09:27
$3500
2019-03-14 09:32
#22
 | 
Denmark oskarsports 
$3$5$0$0$
2019-03-14 09:36
3500$
2019-03-14 09:36
$3500
2019-03-14 14:53
3500$
2019-03-15 14:19
3500$
2019-03-19 10:29
You late to the party
2019-03-27 18:19
6900$
2019-03-14 09:44
#57
 | 
India pranshu 
say hello to uncle vlad
2019-03-14 12:14
Hello Vlad
2019-03-14 12:33
#2
Aleksib | 
Finland OldGuy 
+1. 3500 or 3400 would be better. Buying AUG shouldn't be every roung thing but kind of a higher risk purchase.
2019-03-14 09:05
#9
 | 
Italy ReanuKeeves 
Agree
2019-03-14 09:13
#34
 | 
Denmark Userunknown 
+1
2019-03-14 10:01
+1 3400 would be good because you would have to decide between m4+smoke and aug.
2019-03-14 11:51
#62
AmaNEk | 
France ZywHere 
3450 perfect
2019-03-14 12:23
#77
Aleksib | 
Finland OldGuy 
Could be right. I would still like to see AUG used in the game. It creates little bit more diversity.
2019-03-14 13:41
but the balance is fucked with AUG, AK was >m4 because as T you need to enter bomb sites, now you have AUG who is =AK at mid/short range and > at long range, i dont really understand why valve did this shit move
2019-03-14 15:30
How is AUG = AK mid / short range? AK more damage and AUG oneshotkill headshot needs to be very close. Also isn't aug's long range damage slightly lower than m4? Not sure about that one tho. But anycase we know that the aug is not OP but powerful in long ranges so why do you play yourself in situations where you need to play long range against aug? If META changes on CT playstyle why don't you counter it with T? Stats doesn't still show that CT side is OP so why all the cry? Learn to play
2019-03-19 10:27
Im talking about the balance between weapons regarding the needs you have on each side, giving a scoped rifle to the holding side is just facilitating the sides. "Stats doesn't still show that CT side is OP" you better watch some matches before trying to have an opinion, the last major shown that with aug the CT side was easier, and guess what, Valve changed it back, why ? Learn to think
2019-03-19 10:34
+1
2019-03-19 10:29
#4
 | 
Georgia forsenHappy 
It should be 4k to be honest.
2019-03-14 09:08
-1
2019-03-14 09:22
Too expensive 3500$ actually ideal for aug
2019-03-14 09:50
Nah, 16k
2019-03-14 12:43
+1
2019-03-14 13:08
#110
 | 
Denmark how_much_ 
16001 tbh
2019-03-14 15:45
133769**
2019-03-14 16:54
+1
2019-03-19 17:29
yeah, its still too strong
2019-03-14 09:09
ye, but in 3weeks :>
2019-03-14 09:09
3300 confirmed
2019-03-14 09:11
#8
Zeus | 
Finland 0lter 
3500 atleast for sure. I thought valve wanted games to be more balanced not just CT sided. Isnt that why they changed nuke?
2019-03-14 09:11
The game isn't heavily ct sided. Even with aug at 3150 some maps were t sided
2019-03-14 11:53
#50
Zeus | 
Finland 0lter 
2019-03-14 11:55
What?
2019-03-14 15:43
#113
Zeus | 
Finland 0lter 
The game is ct sided
2019-03-14 16:40
3 maps in major had more t side wins
2019-03-14 16:51
D2,Cache. Is Inferno the third? Would be very near. I think inferno is T sided because of map control. Show me some stats. I think all other maps would be heavily CT sided.
2019-03-14 18:48
#10
Xyp9x | 
Cyprus Xeeh 
You think we should have 2750 scout and 4200 krieg too? Stupid
2019-03-14 09:13
#24
 | 
Denmark oskarsports 
No one wants the krieg anyways
2019-03-14 09:36
update incoming
2019-03-14 10:28
#108
 | 
Europe _jUNGLE 
+1 always pay attn to details.
2019-03-14 15:33
Yeah its 3300 but with the new economy teams also have more money Needs a proper nerf now that pandora's box is open Lower fire rate so its better than the m4 long range but worse up close
2019-03-14 09:15
#13
 | 
Georgia forsenHappy 
Cool thing would be if aug was only available to one player each round.
2019-03-14 09:19
I don't think weird restrictions like that belong in cs Just make it so there is a trade off between aug and m4, not just having one being a straight upgrade to the other
2019-03-14 09:24
#20
 | 
Georgia forsenHappy 
Aug is too powerful when bunch of players use it on CT i think it should become like secondary awp-style when most of the times only one player uses it, plus is that it would make game more interesting in my opinion and it sets barrier little higher for T but not as much as 3 or more players with it. I think it would create more stranger balance to the game, it is definitely worth trying i think.
2019-03-14 09:32
gun restrictions really don't belong in CS, period.
2019-03-14 09:59
#42
Aleksib | 
Finland OldGuy 
Exactly
2019-03-14 11:45
#64
 | 
Georgia forsenHappy 
But why? I hear same thing over and over but i don't actually hear reason why? I think it would be a nice experiment, game still will be varied in terms of guns but more balanced and it will be very interesting to see the way pro players will use only one Aug, for example aug can be very usful on dust 2 CT side around car area as i found AK too over-powered when they rush from short.
2019-03-14 12:30
Because the whole game is balanced around economy vs how powerful a gun is. It’s likr saying teams shouldn’t have more then 1 awp or auto sniper. Just because you can buy 5 doesn’t mean everyone will. There is a trade off in the end. There is a good possibility a lot of pros won’t be buying augs all the time now. Only when their economy is stable enough.
2019-03-14 13:49
#83
 | 
Georgia forsenHappy 
Idea of the restrictions does not change the way game is balanced in terms of economy and power. See when it comes to awp and yuto sinpers you just have no need to buy them because they are useless as you said but when we talk about Aug it's a weapon which is good in almost every situation and some of the players are just very good at it in the same way some of them are good with awp but also not all of them like it since not everybody picks it up but there would be couple of players that would love to play with it like some would with awp. Gun is too powerful and low priced and basing it on economy just doesn't work but if you will put limits on it and don't nerf it, some players will still use it otherwise aug is abused and is very annoying, so i don't think you can compare it with awp. Pluses are what i described before, it will add interesting aspects to the game and the way pros will use the gun, aslo game will be more veried in terms of gun use and it might actually work out, it is worth trying, we never had anything like it before.
2019-03-14 14:14
It's just breaking with one of the great things about CS. The aug has been in the game for years, maybe it's a bit too cheap now. Up the price, maybe nerf it a bit, but there is no need for forced limitations on top of that.
2019-03-14 14:27
#89
 | 
Georgia forsenHappy 
It does not change game that much honestly and i'm not for nerfing it. the way aug is right now with the limitation, it could work out just fine. Some of the cs fans are way to conservative in my mind.
2019-03-14 14:39
5 ak's is also not abusing the ak. aug is only a bit stronger than an ak and only really better at certain angles. T's have enough options to wreck a team of 5 augs. If the aug really is too strong and unfair, it should be nerfed. If not, it gets restricted by the economy.
2019-03-14 14:43
#96
 | 
Georgia forsenHappy 
Ok, i've changed my mind, i think i don't understand something when it comes to economy especially now, i'm bit of a ignorant i think but let's find out how it will work out with the new economy system But still i think limitation idea would be still fun to try out.
2019-03-14 14:47
youtube.com/watch?v=Zn53rWkWmjg We will have to see how the last update will work out. I hope it will not replace the M4's.
2019-03-14 14:58
The economy is the restriction. When a team is wealthy enough they can buy 5 autosnipers, but that is just a huge risk and probably a dumb buy. Maybe 3300 for aug is too low, but it's the economy that restricts how many guns you can use.
2019-03-14 14:18
#88
 | 
Georgia forsenHappy 
So what i'm saying is you can't compare aug with snipers because as you said many awps are usless but same isn't true for aug cuz people are abusing it as aug is very good right now in every situation in the game. If you we want to keep the weapon in order to make game still more interesting you have to put limiation on aug, this will not change the game much but it is still a nice experiment otherwise you just have to put back aug in the place where it was, to me having one Aug is way more interesting than not having it.
2019-03-14 14:28
After this update the aug is where it was for a long time. So I don’t get why that would result in no one using it. Even with a bit higher price. Regarding your idea of limiting the weapons... in my opinion that is very much the wrong step to take. Not even so much for pros but for everyone. Just let every player decide for themselves what they want to buy. Think about solo queueing for example. We live in a world today, where people so often ask for restrictions of everything. If you don’t like it, ban it. That’s the usual attempt I feel, rather than the more logic one of trying to actually fix a problem. If the aug will still have to much impact change it a bit, so it has reasons to be bought but also gives the m4 its right to exist.
2019-03-14 14:47
#98
 | 
Georgia forsenHappy 
#96
2019-03-14 14:49
New economy just helps teams that are losing big time and takes away the need for a double eco when already far behind.
2019-03-14 09:58
#35
 | 
United States Rich_IT_Guy 
I don' think the weapon itself needs any change, it's not OP with the right price.
2019-03-14 10:01
#14
 | 
Russia parovozik 
agreed that 3300$ is too cheap
2019-03-14 09:19
yes it's cheap with new economy.
2019-03-14 09:28
#25
 | 
Germany mrrwombat 
especially with the new money system they should set the price to 3.5k
2019-03-14 09:39
#26
 | 
Russia baryga007 
just remove the scope /closed
2019-03-14 09:43
Then its not an AUG.
2019-03-14 14:36
It should be 6900$
2019-03-14 09:44
Acting like there’s more than 2 people on the dev team xD
2019-03-14 09:46
Acting like hltv users are smarter than csgo devs xD
2019-03-14 09:53
#36
 | 
France 0racle 
lmao 3500 is still easily worth it
2019-03-14 10:03
With the economy update I think it will be easier to afford an AUG, teams won't have to do double ecos (correct me if I'm wrong), removing the "reset potential" of the following rounds and making it easier to close out games
2019-03-14 10:20
+1 i agree, unfortunately nobody will stop playing with that shit
2019-03-14 10:25
noone cared when it was 3300, everyone used it at 3150, and now they revert to 3300 u all think its shit?
2019-03-14 10:33
#43
Zeus | 
Finland 0lter 
?wat?
2019-03-14 11:47
noone cared when it was 3300, everyone used it at 3150, and now they revert to 3300 u all think its shit?
2019-03-14 11:54
#51
Zeus | 
Finland 0lter 
still what?
2019-03-14 11:55
NOONE CARED WHEN IT WAS 3300, EVERYONE USED IT AT 3150, AND NOW THEY REVERT TO 3300 AAND U ALL THINK ITS SHIT?
2019-03-14 11:58
#55
Zeus | 
Finland 0lter 
que?
2019-03-14 11:59
#60
 | 
Vietnam ponmemes 
ota
2019-03-14 12:19
#44
 | 
Russia mmmmmmajestic 
It should cost at least 3800$, people who want to play with a scoped rifler gun should pay at least extra 500$ to its original price(3300$).
2019-03-14 11:51
#48
 | 
Sweden Trkmag 
+1
2019-03-14 11:54
i would say the price is about right, if u broke u buy m4, if your economy is good abuse AUG.
2019-03-14 11:55
#52
 | 
Czech Republic pr0kda 
Bullpup Lul
2019-03-14 11:57
If they keep this new loser bonus system, many guns will be strangely balanced
2019-03-14 11:57
#63
 | 
Other VladimirLucas 
I agree
2019-03-14 12:25
thats the reason why shotguns are that cheap now cuz you can throw it away after 1 round
2019-03-14 14:24
But that is the idea, they buffed it to make people use it. Now that people know that it's good they made it more expensive.
2019-03-14 11:59
So true
2019-03-14 12:15
And it is good man.Pros were stupid and now we have fourth good gun in the game.I like it It is nicer experience to watch cs now
2019-03-14 12:17
if i die once more from all the back in ivy to A main on train im going to beat the shit out of these retarded autistic devs. i can barely see these faggots and they simply spray me down like its fucking close range.
2019-03-14 12:20
#65
 | 
United States JustBitsy 
Its not about stopping them from buying it. It was about getting people to learn the gun and use it. There should be a economic impact of buying the aug over m4. Thats what they did with the update, but maybe there needs to be more economic impact, we will see...
2019-03-14 12:32
A D A P T
2019-03-14 12:33
#69
 | 
United States Globebuster 
no u
2019-03-14 13:03
oof
2019-03-14 13:05
#71
s1mple | 
India se7eNNN 
A D A P T D A P T
2019-03-14 13:05
#72
 | 
Sweden dr9ken 
Negev should be 6969€ tbh
2019-03-14 13:06
#74
AdreN | 
Kazakhstan Aiomie 
ITT butthurt scrubs. Learn to adapt.
2019-03-14 13:10
#75
allu | 
Ukraine stuartik 
5k will be enough
2019-03-14 13:14
people would rather use AUG then buy a flash, update will change nothing
2019-03-14 13:16
#78
 | 
Germany 1fRaNkkK 
Even 3500 is low considering the economy changes... :D
2019-03-14 13:43
might be true, 3300 with this economy system definetly not enough, 3500 might just do it but i could see it going to like 3700-3800
2019-03-14 13:47
scout 2750 LUL it's even shittier in 1.6
2019-03-14 13:44
#81
 | 
World ///fuck 
$3500 is cheap, only $350 difference
2019-03-14 13:50
All plebs crying now after you cant rush bomb site and rek all cts anymore. Aug is not op, ak47 still 1 click hs, end of discussion, lets play.
2019-03-14 14:25
that was the whole point is my guess of that change and the revert, creates diversity
2019-03-14 14:34
hehe
2019-03-14 14:34
EDIT: I was wrong ignore.
2019-03-14 14:38
Well alot if pepole said that when price was decrised + M4a1-s has 25 bulletsand that affect me alot coz i play with it
2019-03-14 14:53
*affects
2019-03-14 14:51
Pasha Alondon school is correct Not you xd
2019-03-14 14:52
pepole pepepole pepesad pepefeelsbadman
2019-03-14 14:56
Spiliffeelsbiceps
2019-03-14 15:25
#99
suNny | 
Argentina Sunnie 
Yep, $3300 still cheap .. and I think they will do that to increase the price to $3500 at least ..
2019-03-14 14:51
deleted
2019-03-14 15:48
#112
 | 
Denmark Jonasnhj 
It was 3300 before, and it is now. They didnt buff the fire rate, damage, recoil or anything other than the money. And people call it too OP and that it needs to be nerfed. Its weird, cause its exactly the same as what it has been for the past 2+ years. But only because the pros are good at know how to use guns they call it OP. Thats the same thing as saying that the AK is op cause it can 1 tap at any range and does more damage while it cost alot less. But nobody comments on that. Neither with the M4A4, its "OP" since everyone used it right?. Its the fucking same thing. People just need to find stupid reasons for dying or their favorite team losing, that it is to be blamed on the AUG and not the team.
2019-03-14 15:50
#117
 | 
United States BubbleFlames 
+1
2019-03-14 16:58
another idiot who doesnt get the point.
2019-03-19 10:31
Should be 3.5k like it used to be
2019-03-14 16:49
scout 2750$ LUL
2019-03-14 16:59
#122
 | 
Germany VeryNaizGuy 
The AUG has been in the game since launch with the same fucking stats. the gun became $150 cheaper and everyone started using it, and NOW it's overpowered? Do you mean that it wasn't before?
2019-03-19 10:28
oh man so many low iq people holy shit. NOBODY knew how strong the gun is, NOBODY knew its potential because NOBODY was bothered using it. is it so hard to understand this simple fucking shit?
2019-03-19 10:31
#131
 | 
Germany VeryNaizGuy 
The thing is that the gun is not fucking OP.
2019-03-19 10:41
nobody cares about your silver opinion
2019-03-19 11:07
#137
 | 
Germany VeryNaizGuy 
Silver opinion? For fuck's sake! If you can win a duel against an AWP with an AK how come you can't do that against an AUG? It's almost literally an A4 with a scope, sure that at close range is a 1 tap to the helmet but it's the same with the AK. If the AUG is OP, the SG553 should be completely nuked from the game because it's also very accurate, has a high fire rate, high damage, can one tap from any distance, has a scope and it's the only gun in the whole game with %100 armor penetration. Oh, yeah, it's a situational gun then; it's OP at long distances. Well, use your utility for fuck's sake. With this shitty logic every gun in the game is OP; the mag7 can kill someone with one shot to the body at close distances, OP! The AWP kills someone with a single shot to the chest, OP!!! THE DEAGLE IT'S A PISTOL AND CAN ONE TAP HELMETS???? PLEASE REMOVE RIGHT NOW. smh
2019-03-19 17:20
It's op
2019-03-19 17:32
It's op
2019-03-19 17:32
#127
 | 
Slovakia ypsylonnn 
Never realised u could buy krieg as CT in 1.6
2019-03-19 10:32
im sorry for you dude.. so many retards in this thread not understanding your simple point. but its not suprising, because shooter games usually attract the low iq gamers.
2019-03-19 10:35
#130
 | 
Morocco de_cpl_mill 
Bot weapon. M4 all day!
2019-03-19 10:39
No it's good
2019-03-19 10:41
#133
 | 
Israel ZiinTotH 
Especially with the new economy, cts will almost always have the option to go for aug buy instead of m4
2019-03-19 10:43
Scout 2750 lol
2019-03-19 10:44
#136
 | 
United States Trump2020KAG 
With normal price again players made it good not valve.
2019-03-19 11:10
The aug at 3300$ is fine ... look at pro game they already buy it less than before
2019-03-19 17:23
$0 better price
2019-03-19 17:26
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.