Thread has been deleted
Last comment
-nuke +vertigo / -cache +cobble
AREA | 
Belarus V4DOS 
what the fuck vertigo instead of such a good map to put this garbage
2019-03-29 11:30
astralis would be ruined if valve removed nuke, but I don't think nuke is bad map, cobble and vertigo is more shit than nuke.
2019-03-29 11:32
Astralis fine in every map -cache even better
2019-03-29 11:34
#4
AREA | 
Belarus V4DOS 
hurt that clean interesting map but instead of nuke could add cobble
2019-03-29 11:35
Thats why they are 43-6 on inferno, 18-9 on mirage, 16-8 on overpass, 19-3 on dust2, 8-4 on train and 4-1 on cache in last 12 months (+ 26-0 on nuke during that time span) and their lowest win rate is 66.7% (overpass, train, mirage) with the rest of the maps being 80% and higher. Also they entered 2019 as a dominant force on every single map (aside from cache which they have yet to play), keep dreaming
2019-03-29 11:43
+1
2019-03-29 11:59
#18
 | 
Europe tweekzter 
+1 - nuke requires good teamplay. One of the more complex maps along with inferno and overpass. cache needed a facelift. I always found it quite boring.
2019-03-29 13:05
cobble is DEAD
2019-03-29 11:33
#5
SPUNJ | 
Netherlands Wazaguy 
Why is cbbl better than vertigo?
2019-03-29 11:35
#6
AREA | 
Belarus V4DOS 
Cobble is better than nuke, and cash is better than vertigo
2019-03-29 11:36
#7
SPUNJ | 
Netherlands Wazaguy 
How? Besides, you wanted to replace Nuke with vertigo, and cache with cbbl.
2019-03-29 11:38
#8
AREA | 
Belarus V4DOS 
no matter what kind of mapy, what to replace The fact is that a cobble would be better than a vertigo and a nuke
2019-03-29 11:39
#9
SPUNJ | 
Netherlands Wazaguy 
Why? You haven't explained why, you only said it would be better.
2019-03-29 11:40
#11
AREA | 
Belarus V4DOS 
I as soon as I see a nuke, I immediately turn off the stream, I am sure that most of them do this Cobble is more interesting and rich for me Well, if it was necessary to remove the cache to change it, then add vertigo instead it's trash
2019-03-29 11:43
#12
SPUNJ | 
Netherlands Wazaguy 
Those are both subjective opinions. I like Nuke because it's different. I dislike Cobble because of the layout and the mostly single lane rotation on the ct side. Why is cobble, objectively better, than Nuke or Vertigo?
2019-03-29 11:47
#13
AREA | 
Belarus V4DOS 
For me, he is the most spectacular vertigo is generally a mistake of nature, having played 1 time on this map, I have not visited it for about 2 years and I am sure that this card will introduce a very large imbalance in the cs
2019-03-29 11:50
#14
SPUNJ | 
Netherlands Wazaguy 
"For me" You're being subjective again. "vertigo is generally a mistake of nature, having played 1 time on this map, I have not visited it for about 2 years" Which is again, subjective. an objective argument could be "Vertigo is worse than cobble because of the short range nature of the map. Because of the short ranges, there will be a change in what weapons are used, like shotguns, which are weapons that require less skill to use"
2019-03-29 11:55
#16
AREA | 
Belarus V4DOS 
I'm telling you that does not suit me. I absolutely do not care what + you found in this replacement ''FOR ME'', the perfect map pool dust2 cache cobble inferno mirage overpass train 50/50
2019-03-29 13:01
#17
SPUNJ | 
Netherlands Wazaguy 
I asked you why it was better, not why you thought it was better.
2019-03-29 13:03
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.