either way youre killing something thats doesnt have a choice
You just explained the main distinction on why one should be forbidden and the other allowed, so why the question about logical consistency?
The first crime in your life was committed by your parents when you were born
no abortion and Euthanasia is for pussies just do jihad so you dont become boomer Ez.
I think they are both 2 different situations, with 2 different very valid arguments. For abortion, it's about somebody who has "so much to live for." For euthanasia, that person is basically already at the end of their life, and they could avoid a lot of pain. I think that having 2 differing opinions is fine, since both situations are really quite different from each other.
I think someone with a terminal disease should have the right to euthanasia. Abortion is a dumpster fire of a topic so i wont even approach it
If a women wants to abort they'll do it anyway, with or without the doctors. A women only aborts in extremely difficult situations, thus making abortion legal or not is not gonna change anything aside from saving those poor women from butchery conditions.
Hell, here in Portugal abortion rates actually decreased with the legalization of abortion.