Thread has been deleted
Last comment
WW3
 | 
Korea XigNGODtop1 
If you think that there will ever be a third world war you are delusional. No world leader will ever be stupid enough to do something that would cause an all-out war with the threat of nuclear weapons existing.
2019-04-19 08:42
flag didnt check out
2019-04-19 08:44
#26
 | 
Other wtf_men 
his country is the first to get nuked
2019-04-19 09:45
#30
 | 
Korea XigNGODtop1 
wtf_men
2019-04-19 09:47
#31
 | 
Other wtf_men 
wtfmen((
2019-04-19 09:48
#60
 | 
Russia Ouuuuch 
truly +1
2019-04-19 19:09
#69
 | 
United States NoKeTchup 
learn flags lol
2019-04-20 08:00
#72
 | 
Other wtf_men 
wat u mean men?)
2019-04-20 09:33
#87
 | 
Russia Islademuerto 
NK can shell Seoul if they want to lmao, they dont even need nukes lul.
2019-04-20 16:38
#89
 | 
Ukraine ENCEphalitis 
north korea is not south korea
2019-04-20 16:58
no rly
2019-04-20 18:23
no war until some country will do stupid shit, this is not 20 century and we are smart.
2019-04-19 08:44
"smart"
2019-04-19 18:36
#53
 | 
Korea KuRoNa 
Smart? Haha Look at that Pig of North Korea If u think are smart, First China have to stop support that piggy OMEGALUL
2019-04-19 18:47
wtf im fakeflegger men
2019-04-19 18:57
#84
 | 
Venezuela cubek 
LOL
2019-04-20 16:33
expected from zuela
2019-04-20 16:57
i doubt it will ever happen
2019-04-19 08:46
no world leader will ever be stupid enough? do you KNOW who the current POTUS is?
2019-04-19 08:48
#5
 | 
Korea XigNGODtop1 
I do, and while his behavior in Twitter has been pretty mental, he isn’t stupid in that way. Plus it’s not even a decision that only the president can make. The evidence regarding Trump would support that he is more likely to try and solve problems than start wars, as witnessed by his negotiations with N. Korea.
2019-04-19 08:53
giving power to russia is the opposite of preventing war btw
2019-04-19 08:56
#8
 | 
Korea XigNGODtop1 
”Giving power to Russia” Proof? And what the fuck should he do then, by your logic anything he does with Russia is leading towards a war, because if their relationship goes worse and worse surely that leads the world closer to a war, but also if their relationship gets better it’s leading the world towards a war?
2019-04-19 08:59
you even asking for proof is enough. have a nice day
2019-04-19 09:00
#10
 | 
Korea XigNGODtop1 
How nice of you to dodge my question.
2019-04-19 09:04
#12
 | 
Austria raicoon1337 
Ignore him. He's Swedish.
2019-04-19 09:09
#27
 | 
Other wtf_men 
didn't hitler come from your country men? ))
2019-04-19 09:46
#28
 | 
Austria raicoon1337 
So?
2019-04-19 09:47
#29
 | 
Other wtf_men 
its ok not everyone can be mean im sure u nice men))
2019-04-19 09:47
So should you really talk about countries when your country produced the world's most hated man in all of history? Fucking dog
2019-04-19 18:34
#9
2019-04-19 18:33
Classic response from someone who knows he isn't capable of debating on an intellectual level. If you aren't smart enough, why respond in the first place? lmao
2019-04-19 09:09
HAHAHA yeah dude, I'm toooootally wrong. Genius
2019-04-19 18:34
It's more like the best response I can give in a situation where I'm not bothered in the slightest to type 10 paragraphs of why Trump is a Russian puppet to someone I don't even know on HLTV who will probably dismiss it anyway seeing as their agenda would be completely destroyed. I'd rather not waste 20 minutes of my time on one single comment. If you can't see it yourself, you're not worth it. At that point you lack the intelligence to even read what I'm saying in all honesty
2019-04-19 18:37
The fact that you keep on circling around the main question keeps on proving that you have zero proof or any substantial argument that leads to any concrete evidence that Trump is a Russian puppet. Keep clowning around, it's actually hilarious.
2019-04-20 07:54
#48
2019-04-20 13:34
I agree. If I were to mimic doggelito's antics, I can claim that it's "so obvious" that Jews are controlling global politics and when asked for proof, respond that "if you can't see it yourself, you're not worth it". Not only is it going around in circles but it destroys any credibility you may think you have. Why does this guy expect anybody to take his claims seriously if he can't produce solid, concrete evidence lol
2019-04-20 14:37
Burden of proof is on the person making the accusation lmao in this case, you
2019-04-19 09:19
Didn't ask him for proof. Learn what words mean.
2019-04-19 18:33
I never said you asked him for proof. Learn what words mean. but I am saying he was right to ask you for proof given that you've made such an accusation. And no, "anyone can see it given that you're not dumb" is not proof.
2019-04-20 07:50
Yes you fucking did you dog, as you claimed the BURDEN of PROOF is on me.
2019-04-20 13:35
Burden of proof "the obligation to prove one's assertion." Again, I never said YOU asked him for proof. But I am saying HE was right to ask you for proof because in this case, you made an assertion and hence, the obligation to provide proof is on you, not him. I know you didn't ask him for proof, and it's good that you didn't.....because he's not the one who's supposed to be proving anything lol.
2019-04-20 14:31
It kinda is. It's honestly used in courts all the time
2019-04-20 13:35
logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/Logi.. I highly doubt it and even if it is, it's an incredibly weak argument.
2019-04-20 14:33
He has JOHN BOLTON working for him. That proves all of his intentions. The guy is a massive cunt
2019-04-19 09:48
Kim jong boom sends their regards
2019-04-19 08:58
#14
 | 
Brazil BlueLighting 
I believe that everyone thought the same at the time that Hitler had not yet begun the war.
2019-04-19 09:21
#18
 | 
Korea XigNGODtop1 
There was no threat of nuclear weapons during that time, it makes all the difference.
2019-04-19 09:29
First of all, reality doesn't give a flying feck about your opinion on how stupid or intelligent world leaders are and second denying climate change and/or willingly making it worse is as bad as dropping a nuke, maybe even worse.
2019-04-19 09:23
nigga wat
2019-04-19 09:25
#22
 | 
Korea XigNGODtop1 
How did denying climate change have anything to do with the topic at hand? And sure, reality doesn’t give a fuck about my opinions, but in the end if you think that we are capable of electing so many people that are willing to start a nuclear war that it happens, your life is a sad one.
2019-04-19 09:34
It points out that we don't need nuclear weapons to destroy life on this planet for a certain period of time and that some leaders indeed are stupid and/or self-centered enough to feck everything up for everyone that can't afford a cozy shelter to survive it or at least live a few more years. And I do think we are able of that, just look at how many people go back to the old left vs right bullshit, plus we don't have to vote 10 leaders who would do it, it only takes one. But you're probably right that no one will do it because it could mean annihilation for themselves in return but to just say it's outright impossible is just naive. On a geopolitical point of view, you're absolutely right, my life is very sad right now.
2019-04-19 12:00
1. you cant know that.. also a worldwar wouldnt necessarily have to be nuclear 2. i also dont think theres going to be a world war anytime soon
2019-04-19 09:28
#20
 | 
Korea XigNGODtop1 
It wouldn’t necessarily have to be nuclear, no, but the threat of nuclear weapons existing means that a) the losing side in a war of that scale would more than likely want to retaliate by using said weapons and b) no one in their right mind will want to start a war
2019-04-19 09:31
theres rules in war too, thats why Germany had only Japan left as their ally towards the end of ww2, because they broke all the rules there could be some sort of Agreement, that whoever uses nuclear arms would lose all their priviledges and support from their allies also even if People would fire a nuclear rocket at lets say the USA, that would have to be from 1000s of kilometres away and they have highly advanced Missile defense Systems that would just pluck any Missile Right out of the air or make it explode mid-air and saying that no one in their Right mind would want to start a war kinda ignores the fact that theres several wars going on already, in some of which the us and Russia support opposing sides
2019-04-19 09:45
#34
 | 
Korea XigNGODtop1 
Fair enough; my wording should have been better. No one in their right mind would start a war between major parties. While it saddens me to say this, most of the countries don’t really matter in the grand scheme of things. I don’t mean this as a degrading or offensive comment, just how especially most world leaders see the world. When it comes to agreements about not using nuclear weapons, I sincerely doubt that people would care about them if they were losing the conflict badly. I agree that Missile Defense Systems would make a difference, but I think that there is still a possibility of even the US getting damaged by them.
2019-04-19 09:52
The third word war was really close if you didn't know it was just one button push away from happening
2019-04-19 09:31
#21
 | 
Korea XigNGODtop1 
It is always one push of a button away, but my point is that the button will never be pushed, and no large-scale wars will be starting precisely because of the button.
2019-04-19 09:32
No but in Russia there was a commander who got the information there was a rocket attack heading to him and the chance was about 50-50 that it was real, hhe had to decide to do nothing or to fire back he did nothing and the attack was false alarm. If he fired back there's world war 3
2019-04-19 09:53
Imagine if WW3 happened because someone just got baited. HLTV quality content right there.
2019-04-20 16:33
What do you mean
2019-04-20 17:50
The guy nearly got baited into firing a fucking nuke by a false alarm, that would the best/closest to a bait you will get to start a world war.
2019-04-20 17:57
Oh yeah the alarm detected some weird lights In the clouds and thought it was a rocket it was real close
2019-04-20 19:42
fnatic vs draken they have him locked up in contract that will cause cs ww3
2019-04-19 09:39
#24
 | 
Brazil goodfallen 
Google the samson option Ez ww3 if isreal is ever in existensial crisis
2019-04-19 09:39
guys calm tits. no world war without germany, thats historically proven german military so bad atm, im sure we dont start world war. sry
2019-04-19 09:50
#86
 | 
Venezuela cubek 
Hahaha so true.
2019-04-20 16:34
ww3 already started, but there was not "official" information. Islam vs France, Spain, Italy & Greece
2019-04-19 09:53
Third world war is gonna be an race war
2019-04-19 09:56
#38
 | 
Korea XigNGODtop1 
I doubt it, but we all know who would be victorious in that one
2019-04-19 09:59
cockroach obviously
2019-04-19 18:36
If there will ever be ww3, it will be cuz Israel and USA for sure. Others will join the war just to get rid of the danger of being vs USA
2019-04-19 10:00
Don't underestimate the level of stupidity of people put in the office. After all, Trump started a program to create mini nuke able to fit in a suitcase.
2019-04-19 18:35
#52
 | 
Hungary HAS12 
fake news, reported.
2019-04-19 18:45
#49
 | 
Germany AP)) 
Better get your gas masks and prep before its to late.
2019-04-19 18:37
#50
 | 
France funKKush182 
Wow...Japanese folks too scared of Nukes Who saw that coming?!
2019-04-19 18:39
#54
 | 
Georgia Broozman 
WW3 started already, man.
2019-04-19 18:47
WW3 started in 2001.
2019-04-19 18:49
#58
 | 
United States PsychoLogical 
If WW3 were to break out, I predict that it'll be over Venezuela or Taiwan :>
2019-04-19 19:07
If there would ever be a Third World War it will probably be 1-2 countries vs the world
2019-04-19 19:08
"Ever"? That's quite a claim. "Ever" covers a long time, even guessing the future conflicts over the next 50 years is not that easy, even for those who study this subject professionally. I have my doubts regarding a third world war in the next 10-20 years, but beyond that my confidence drops rapidly as the time period increases. If there's one thing I don't underestimate, it's the ability for humans to find a reason to fight, so I certainly won't rule out a third world war from *ever* happening. Nukes and the current living conditions of the people having nukes are enough a deterrent for now, but it could change. Our extraction of planetary resources is growing exponentially while their availability is decreasing dramatically, even without the future constraints of climate change, the lack of resources alone will put a heavy weight on our global economy in this current century, which is likely to be a serious source of conflict. Even if it's not enough to create a world war, this century is only the start of our problems on a global scale.
2019-04-19 19:13
Did not read but i agree
2019-04-20 07:58
Russia vs Navalny
2019-04-20 08:00
There is war going on all the time and new ones will come for sure. Big nations will make sure of that. It may not be called world war but there is still war somewhere all the time.
2019-04-20 08:00
When NATO alliance bombs middle east it's not world war?
2019-04-20 16:24
#82
 | 
Canada NELK 
+1 there will not be a WW3
2019-04-20 16:25
#83
 | 
Finland hotguy2004 
doesnt matter because the world is gonna end in 2012 😯
2019-04-20 16:25
+1
2019-04-20 17:58
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.