Thread has been deleted
Last comment
nip knocked out epl?
rain | 
New Zealand flux1 
can someone please explain how nip is out of round 2 they have a better loss deferential than devils.one nip -4 and devils.one -28 it doesnt make sense
2019-04-20 03:51
I don’t care how, if you bring back dennis for draken and play with a shit IGL and shit coach for over a year you deserve to lose
2019-04-20 03:52
#3
 | 
Bulgaria ONZIEMA 
NiKo and s1mple in one team deserve to win
2019-04-20 03:53
Yes but they are not in the same team
2019-04-20 03:53
#5
rain | 
New Zealand flux1 
youre not answering my question so just leave fam you cant do any better at igl
2019-04-20 03:53
No but I’m not a pro, flusha/golden/hampus or even pronax would be more reasonable than Lekr0 IGL, not to mention pita coach
2019-04-20 03:54
#10
 | 
Bulgaria ONZIEMA 
with pita they have charity sponsors
2019-04-20 03:56
True he is a scammer as well
2019-04-20 04:00
Pronax can fuck off because he'd be a bot now. Imo -dennis + real igl and make lekr0 fragger again and f0rest awp when they need it.
2019-04-20 03:57
Yes he isn’t good but he’d STILL be a better IGL choice than Lekr0, they litteraly have 0 strats.
2019-04-20 04:00
you clearly don't know how anything works, devils.one beat them head to head
2019-04-20 03:53
Hes just asking a question, you dont need to be toxic when a lot of tournaments put it down to round difference
2019-04-20 03:55
Agreed.
2019-04-20 03:57
Reported
2019-04-20 03:57
#14
rain | 
New Zealand flux1 
yeah why do you think i asked and devils lost to heroic and heroic lost to nip it goes in a full circle so shouldnt rd come into play
2019-04-20 03:58
I think it should have but sadly its factored below h2h and map wins
2019-04-20 04:00
#4
 | 
Portugal Afacs 
probably because nip lost to them, not sure tho
2019-04-20 03:53
They put a lot of things before round difference this time. Total map wins puts heroic through, then it went to head 2 head and since devils.one beat NiP, NiP is eliminated.
2019-04-20 03:53
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.