Thread has been deleted
Last comment
NIP era!!!
tarik | 
Finland rulethewaves 
Nip 87-0 was the most dominant team the world will ever see.
2019-04-23 21:00
+1
2019-04-23 21:00
#3
 | 
Israel wetz 
Lmao
2019-04-23 21:02
#41
Aleksib | 
Finland sakumb 
Lmao
2019-04-24 09:00
*Most consistant There is differance
2019-04-23 21:01
#4
 | 
Israel wetz 
+1
2019-04-23 21:02
Even though 87-0 was very impressive and I am an old NiP fan. There is a difference as this guy say, most consistent back in the days, not most dominant. And if you compare them to MIBR 3 years ago, or Astralis right now, they would not win versus those teams.
2019-04-23 21:44
Its not that ez coz if they would play 1. They would know how each other plays so they would change strategy 2. Its different csgo version in updates 3. Some playing styles are good aginst ones and bad aginst others so as there isnt any posible comparing its inposible to say who wins what makes everything 50/50
2019-04-23 22:13
Mostly because the competitive scene was very poor and not so much by players' merit.
2019-04-23 21:03
well everyone was as equally good, nip was just ahead, thats a stupid argument :P
2019-04-23 21:35
nahhh not really, the best players were still on 1.6
2019-04-23 21:38
hmm, everyone? aight
2019-04-23 22:15
Fnatic didn't come to CS:GO until November. Natus Vincere came to CS:GO even later and while ESC came to CS:GO between the two, the Polish roster refused to make the necessary roster changes needed to become the dominant force they would later become as Vritus.pro. Similarly, Fnatic and Na`Vi needed time to learn CS:GO, time they didn't have when NiP was dunking on them every other week. The only team that held a candle to NiP was VeryGames, which went on to become Team Titan. VeryGames were good, but somehow, they couldn't ever beat NiP. The problem was partially player performance, but it was also map based. Back then, CS:GO only had five competitive maps, and NiP were amazing at all of them. You couldn't ban them out, while VeryGames chose to focus on four maps and ban Infenro. NiP was never fighting from behind, something they could only really do with such a small map pool. With VeryGames always beating other teams too, there was barely a chance for anyone else to come and upset NiP. They knew how to beat VeryGames every time, and if VeryGames beat everyone else, they never really had to worry about the X-Factor of another team.
2019-04-23 22:23
Well nip was still dominant when fnatic lgb sk navi starten playing, and sure at this time in csgo might not seee like Much but still these were pros right out from 1.6 as nip ( Friberg from source but whatever) so just feels like nip got the ball Rolling rationer, and you are right, we didint have the Big teams like faze but the player remained, and we Cant use an argument that a team did not do rosterchanges to be competetive to make nip era less of a deal than it was
2019-04-24 08:44
#38
 | 
Iran Astr0Steel2k 
That guy is a joke lmao. His reasons why NIP wasn't good is: only 5 maps, teams didn't change soon enough, bad player performances from others, and team's didn't make good roster changes. Yeah, let's not ever give NiP any credit for destroying every team, lets come up with many excuses. lol
2019-04-24 08:50
I mean, i guess he has some valid points but i still would not take credit out of NiP's era in anyway, its like saying that just because some team or player in any other sports like fotball was not good because of one player was not born yet or the roster didint exsist
2019-04-25 00:09
#39
 | 
Switzerland Alzameister 
Lmao the text is copied straight from thorin i believe or some other reporter xD Not that its wrong but atleast use your own words
2019-04-24 08:53
#31
 | 
Sweden BaitsByDre 
Name the best players that still played 1.6 at that point and cs:go now?
2019-04-23 22:17
Do u think I have the time to do that? You have a pc, a monitor, a keyboard and a mouse. Use them. And stop being a cuck nip fanboy.
2019-04-23 22:19
#35
 | 
Sweden BaitsByDre 
You could have named atleast 5 players with that sentence. .
2019-04-23 22:26
read #33
2019-04-23 22:26
#25
REZ | 
Belgium PrgMorris 
the reasons don't matter, objectively the NIP era was way more dominant I do think that the Astralis era is way more of an achievement
2019-04-23 21:38
SwedenNiP 13-16th Pre-Relegation
2019-04-23 21:04
#40
 | 
Other wtf_men 
xaxaxaxa nip in 2019 ))
2019-04-24 08:59
#7
gla1ve | 
Poland kola5410 
it was most dominant era but when cs was on bottom of being competitive because cs 1.6 had better financial options
2019-04-23 21:04
#8
 | 
United States [BluE] 
It was because of how undeveloped the scene was at the time
2019-04-23 21:04
#10
 | 
Israel Baitlander 
+1
2019-04-23 21:05
#9
 | 
Israel Baitlander 
Dominant for sure but the csgo scene wasnt rly that big at that time. So many player switched too late to csgo
2019-04-23 21:05
#11
 | 
Sweden SaigoCS 
-all of the team without forest and rez and make this team great again!
2019-04-23 21:07
Fluke run
2019-04-23 21:10
xd fake swedistan
2019-04-23 21:14
best era
2019-04-23 21:14
+1
2019-04-23 21:15
#16
 | 
Canada suzi 
I mean, who was really supposed to challenge them?
2019-04-23 21:21
CIS All-star team designed specifically to defeat them? Or how about the team with the world's best IGL and the second best player? You didn't watch then, so why do you have the delusion your opinion matters?
2019-04-23 21:28
Delusional
2019-04-23 21:22
+1
2019-04-23 21:30
wtf meng(( no
2019-04-23 21:31
#21
 | 
United States codgun 
Not a fan of them but you can't deny Astralis had the best era given the quality of the scene currently.
2019-04-23 21:34
Lol who cares if the it wasn´t as much good teams. they were still better and more serious from the start. Everyone else atleast ttried
2019-04-23 21:36
#24
rain | 
Norway sofadage 
maybe new NIP era when Get Right gets replaced.
2019-04-23 21:36
#27
 | 
Sweden Akoulad 
"era" = lucky
2019-04-23 21:40
Can someone link me the game that gave NiP 87-1? I'm a newfag
2019-04-23 22:26
+1
2019-04-24 09:08
'Dominant' because the scene was weak. Most impressive era? Hell no.
2019-04-24 09:13
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.