Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Individuality.
NEO | 
India Lackadaisical 
Will there ever be a point of time in the history of Humanity when instead of the various territorial, religious, ideological and racial groupings, we will look towards the individuality of one being a Human?
2019-04-26 15:17
i love indians
2019-04-26 15:20
xpected toxicity from cross dressers.
2019-04-26 15:19
lol rekt
2019-04-26 15:21
#86
 | 
Europe Nomarosa 
LMAO
2019-04-27 07:04
stop selling ur wife
2019-04-26 15:19
edited your comment, Absolutely Pathetic.
2019-04-26 15:36
do you have any proof rashid ?
2019-04-26 15:40
#27
 | 
Kyrgyzstan Anschluss 
The last bit made me laugh Lmao
2019-04-26 16:33
made you laugh, sure cause rashid is so relevant to you. It's a muslim name and I certainly am not a Porkslim.
2019-04-26 16:35
#30
 | 
Kyrgyzstan Anschluss 
Nt pajeet I am an atheist
2019-04-26 16:36
keep telling that to yourself while you deny eating pork and go around flailing that skinned eel.
2019-04-26 16:38
#34
 | 
Kyrgyzstan Anschluss 
Kip eatingh datt raat ub hindu wile wotchign dis video youtu.be/gjxxsmizym8
2019-04-26 16:43
6 years ago + random undeveloped village. One's level of mockery is considered a best gauge of their abilities. This pity in me for you can't be contained anymore.
2019-04-26 16:45
#37
 | 
Kyrgyzstan Anschluss 
I don't care, pajeet You attacked me first
2019-04-26 16:47
second line shows you care and now are submitting, Come on bro it's HLTV, be chill. Don't let words affect you. I take back my words if that helps you sleep better at night.
2019-04-26 16:49
xD This is real low iq comment India has no Muslims okay. btw, loved the topic.
2019-04-26 17:49
#74
 | 
Liechtenstein yppiL 
Can't tell if sarcastic or just retarded
2019-04-26 18:19
dude can you like imagine like world like without borders bro woah that would be so wack bro imagine if we just all got together and like started singing kumbaya and stuff bro like woah dude like damn
2019-04-26 15:18
fuck borders lets sing
2019-04-26 15:20
STOP SHIT POSTING
2019-04-26 15:19
I'm woke.
2019-04-26 15:20
it doesnt even make sense
2019-04-26 15:20
it does bro. How can your English be poorer than mine? You're a native speaker.
2019-04-26 15:21
it doesnt
2019-04-26 15:22
come on man, it does.
2019-04-26 15:23
maybe
2019-04-26 15:24
keep reading it again and again. It's some woke shit. feels good, ain't it eh?
2019-04-26 15:25
I feel rejuvenated, thank you.
2019-04-26 15:26
Yo man nice bhop videos!!
2019-04-27 07:12
fake woke ass mf
2019-04-26 15:22
imagine a world without t-series .....the best world ever <3
2019-04-26 15:27
+1
2019-04-26 17:50
You can already do that if you haven't noticed.
2019-04-26 15:42
Can but we aren't doin it. That's like not even 0.1 perc of Current population which actually practices it. Also, a larger part generally does but only empathetically.
2019-04-26 15:44
Individuality does not require support from social groups like tribalism does. Seems to me that you're confused over what individuality means.
2019-04-26 15:51
seems to me like YOU are confused over what I said although your definition of individuality is clear.
2019-04-26 15:55
What do you mean, what part I am missing? I think your point is desire for individuals to form groups, which isn't helping individuality. The bigger a group the exponentionally more difficult it gets to manage and maintain, so simplification of rules and 'deindividualization' is unavoidable for any sustainability of larger groups.
2019-04-26 16:22
bro you got it all messed up. read it again. I said "instead of the various groupings". What I mean is our outlook towards each other should be that of "another human, just like me".
2019-04-26 16:32
It doesn't make sense to me, because there is both individuals and groups overlaying each other. Existence of groups doesn't disprove existence of individuals, I don't see why groups needs to disappear to reveal individuals.
2019-04-26 16:35
They need to be removed because groups ought not to be formed. Take a primal example of groups in Lions. One group fights the other group. That is what must be abolished. All of humanity is one group, that is "Humans".
2019-04-26 16:39
Grouping isnt' a problem, but it's limits of human condition that makes forming groups neccessary. Groups by themselves aren't either bad or good, you can have both disastrous pathological groups and extremely useful groups.
2019-04-26 16:43
> Groups by themselves aren't either bad or good > disastrous pathological groups and extremely useful group I stated "territorial, religious, ideological and racial grouping" Professional grouping may exist because its domain is limited and because it does not affect society and rather is a personal sphere.
2019-04-26 16:53
marxism and communism that caused world wars were ideologies formed as alternatives to religion.
2019-04-26 17:05
god dammit. "INSTEAD OF territorial, religious, ideological and racial grouping" Did you even read the initial post properly? You keep messing it up bro and handing it back to me.
2019-04-26 17:12
My brain perceives "instead of territorial, religious, ideological and racial grouping" as different examples in seperation, not as a system that represents a single unarticulated concept.
2019-04-26 17:18
Individual as acting like a human, to a human. treating equally. Maintaining the dignity of yourself and the other which is ought to be. Respecting the individual instead of bearing a pre-conceived opinion of them (something which we do now). A human, addressed as him "being", a human. Currently, on a religious ground, those with similar religions hold somewhat of a familial love. Those on territorial grounds, similar ones hold familial love. Those on racial grounds, similar ones hold familial love. When divided, they tend to form groups. Thus, a single expressed concept is of Humanity and treating every human life as our own.
2019-04-26 17:24
That to me sounds like seperated concept of individuality. More like a philosophy to live a life by. Actual individuality means having freedom to develop your own beliefs and way of thinking.
2019-04-26 17:44
God. Thanks for pointing that out. Seems like my own definition of Individuality was unclear and I kept blaming and demeaning you. I apologize. Just looked up the definition and I admit I'm wrong and neither Individuality nor Individualism can clearly explain what I meant. Did I just create a new philosophy? Or can you tell me what is it that I am trying to say? please keep this conversation continued and don't give up on me.
2019-04-26 17:49
Self-ownership / individual sovereignty concept seems related to the idea.
2019-04-26 18:14
p.s. it's also matter of perspective. Are you looking at this hltv discussion as a group having chat, or do you see each person here as individual?
2019-04-26 16:29
#36
 | 
United States gtmaniacmda 
when there is one human left, maybe
2019-04-26 16:46
Won't ever happen, but we can dream When you meet someone new, and you don't know anything about his "individuality", then you make your idea about the things you know : his color, his accent, his look
2019-04-26 16:52
good point! I will add that name should be an indicator enough of someone's identity. Also, in India, we actually call black skinned people as "hey blackey". But we the implied meaning of that word is its use as an adjective and not a racial slur considering the black guy isn't a negroid but a darker skinned Caucasoid/Dravidian/Aryan Indian.
2019-04-26 17:01
#41
halo | 
United States QastLe 
It's up to every individual whether or not that happens. You can make the choice to look at each person as an individual or as a member of a group. I don't think humanity will ever reach that point, but you can try your best to be an example. Have a good day 😊
2019-04-26 16:57
state your intentions. You True Neutral boi.
2019-04-26 16:58
#45
halo | 
United States QastLe 
I have no intentions beyond giving my answer to your question. Is being neutral bad in your opinion? Have a good day 😊
2019-04-26 17:06
Not against being a neutral but a True Neutral who is always pleasing everyone and is afraid of arriving at a particular standpoint. You're good though. <3
2019-04-26 17:26
#51
halo | 
United States QastLe 
I'm not afraid of taking stances. I just choose my battles carefully. Ask me any question you want and I'll show you my thought process. I say thought process because there are very few subjects where my thoughts are concrete enough to call opinions. My mind can be changed, and it is quite often. Here's some recent comments I've made where I gave a fairly clear opinion. hltv.org/forums/threads/2034581/comittin.. hltv.org/forums/threads/2036236/give-wom.. I will admit I like to please people. It's in my opinion my greatest flaw as people love to take advantage of it. I wish you well 💜
2019-04-26 17:41
Why do you consider pleasing people who you probably won't ever meet to be an important thing? What is your motive behind this act ?
2019-04-26 17:53
Exactly. Either he is the cutest motherfucker or the most deep thought evil master manipulator. There's no in between for him.
2019-04-26 17:58
#63
halo | 
United States QastLe 
For someone to be pleased is generally a positive thing. There is a lot of negative in this world, and I experience a lot of negative in my life. I know other people experience the same, so if I can be a positive force in their life I will. I know I'll mess up(I've messed up a lot recently), but that doesn't mean I shouldn't try to please people even if I don't know them. Have a good day 😊
2019-04-26 17:59
No. You took me wrong partially. Yes. Definitely a very positive thing to do But don't you think that there are people in this site who do nothing but excite hatred and always try to demean and frustate others. I just don't feel it right to see someone pleasing them as you said "I like to please people." in case you're talking about lifting up people by motivating them, then just ignore this, I love doing that too.
2019-04-26 18:05
#70
halo | 
United States QastLe 
If the hatred of those users is aimed at someone else I try to step in but in a manner that is not confrontational. If their hatred is toward me I try to respond to them with the love and kindness I would like in return. I do my best to remain kind and civil regardless of the circumstances. I know people disagree with that, but that is how I want to approach things. Have a good day 😊
2019-04-26 18:16
fuck off with all this kindness of yours mate. It's getting unbearable.
2019-04-26 18:17
I was talking about pleasing these kind of people :3
2019-04-26 18:18
tell me you don't feel these suffocating vibes from him? he's a fkin dork.
2019-04-26 18:20
Umm You actually meet all kinds of people everywhere you go. I just like knowing why they are what they are.
2019-04-26 18:21
#77
halo | 
United States QastLe 
If they hate me then they hate. It's not my decision to make. How I respond however is my choice(#73). Have a good day 💜
2019-04-26 18:23
It is the reason for your 'choice' that I had been asking all the time Have a good day any ways.
2019-04-26 18:28
Alright, Qastle, if you see this... Do you feel the desperation to get validated? considering you are a queer? Being on the good side of everyone while gaining recognition from them? Is it really so important that you have no fkin clue to where you want to be? We literally are anonymous here I can be friendly to you while berating and cursing you with another account of mine. Tell us, What exactly is your DRIVE ? is it the need of validation?
2019-04-26 18:32
Same question but without citing any examples as such and in his own pleasing tune.
2019-04-26 18:35
#82
halo | 
United States QastLe 
#81
2019-04-26 19:14
#81
halo | 
United States QastLe 
The only validation I seek is the validation of my family and closest friends. Being recognized is not a goal for me. I'm not saying I don't like attention, nor do I dislike it. If by drive you mean what motivates me to behave the way I do in the forums, then I don't really have a drive. As you said we're all anonymous, what you say to or about me has no effect on my life outside hltv. I behave this way because it's a safe place for me to be myself without fear of my family discovering my preferences. I assure you, I am just as equally insufferably kind in real life. Which makes me very unpopular. If my desire was to be recognized, and well liked I would behave in the same fashion as everyone else. Validation of strangers means nothing to me. Only family and friends. I'm sorry for being so bothersome 💜
2019-04-26 18:54
very good reply, sums up my thought as well. Opinions change really fast and it's really rare to make up a solid opinion about something. The best thing to do is show your thought process and determine the pros and cons of something
2019-04-26 17:55
What's your age?
2019-04-26 17:56
#64
halo | 
United States QastLe 
I'm 21. I will happily admit that I am naive if that is where you are going with this question 😊
2019-04-26 18:01
No man, I myself am 21. I just want to make sure that you don't believe in the healing crystals/stones and shit.
2019-04-26 18:04
#67
halo | 
United States QastLe 
Oh. No, I don't buy into stuff like that, and I very recently abandoned my faith as it was doing me nothing but harm. Have a good day 😊
2019-04-26 18:09
Honestly, I typed a lot of mean things in this comment but deleted them. Live whichever way you want but don't cross my path ever again on this website.
2019-04-26 18:15
#73
halo | 
United States QastLe 
I will do my best to remember your name and avoid confrontation. I'm sorry for whatever I did to inspire those comments. I wish you the best, goodbye 💜
2019-04-26 18:19
Libertarianism?
2019-04-26 17:20
Awesome thread and content.
2019-04-26 17:50
check out the other one titled "Open Borders."
2019-04-26 17:53
Ay Ay sir.
2019-04-26 17:59
Sadly, this will never happen on a large scale. The only time it really happened in recent history is when the founders of the American States established their system which only lasted for about 80 years. Then during those 80 years many things which their system did were against the Constitutions which they had established over each respective area, and their federal government Constitution. They never truly followed their own laws, but did so better than any society before or after them. I do not think we will ever see individuals respected in a pure way where principles of right and wrong govern all actions. There are too many ignorant, irresponsible, and immoral people in the world today and whenever something just starts to establish itself, it gets taken over by evil men and becomes corrupted. Our true hope for peace, freedom, and a society governed by love only exists in the world to come. There is no hope for this world as it is.
2019-04-26 19:25
amazing point.
2019-04-27 06:55
wasnt really for the slave mens((((( thank for modern democracy and fed ruled illuminati!
2019-04-27 06:58
Slavery is a complex subject. My point was about the legal system they had established amongst themselves who were members of society. Clearly slaves were not under this legal system and were considered property. I'm not going to argue the morality of slavery here because it doesn't matter in the context of the original point I made. Keep in mind that slavery being illegal and mostly considered immoral is a very recent thing. For all of human history in nearly every society we know of slavery was a legal practice that was not considered immoral. Having read hundreds of books mostly by men who lived during these various ages of human history when slavery was legal -- I know that we didn't just become moral people recently, and there are ways to view the issue of slavery which is never discussed today. I don't judge the past based on the present. I try to put myself in their time and their culture to better understand their point of view.
2019-04-27 07:07
Democracy is a terrible form of government unless in a very small State. But, even then people need to be educated, and have the ability to think logically and constructively, and understand key sciences which prepares them for the task of helping to maintain the societies order. The only system that would really work against corruption is for a society to have a written agreement with itself that declares what the absolute laws are and that under no cases can they be violated. Sort of like Plato's philosopher kings of his republic but rather than men -- you have law itself. But not law which grew from a man's mind, but that natural Law which we all know and can agree on. There was an old book written called Rex Lex; which is latin for "the King is Law" and one written in response to it called Lex Rex - The Law is King. While we have flawed humans deciding laws on the fly through "elected" bodies there will always be corruption. The only way to stop this is to take the power to make up laws away from humans and merely enforce the laws we all have written on our hearts, do not murder, do not steal, do not lie, etc. Law isn't that complex and doesn't need all these parasites pretending like they order society for us and make things run smoothly. They are a burden and roadblock more than a legit governing body. But people don't understand these basic concepts and get sucked into politics and keep on supporting there own enslavement. If a society in a state of civilization expects to remain ignorant and free - they expect what never was, and never will be. - Thomas Jefferson
2019-04-27 07:27
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.