That laws is still way too restrictive and most righists agree with me on this peculiar instance. It's clear that it's still extremists that pumped such a law to pass.
Read up the confirmation that has to be done by the physicists, couple that with the white house who just said physicist etc could refuse to practice abortions based on their religious beliefs and you have one very big problem ready to explode and be abused.
I did admit i was wrong numerous times.
" It doesn't cover incest, rape and when a baby isn't viable." This is false as it does indeed cover when a baby isn't viable.
But here you go : look i made a mistake, the linked arcticle didn't encompromise the whole bill, i went ahead to read it afterwards. You will still claim i didn't say so of course.
2 instance out of 3. Great, i'm sure incest and rape victim are clearly going to be great mothers. Here is a hint: if they want an abortion because it happened it's, maybe just maybe, because they don't want to be a mother, they could harm themselves if you force them or raise a kid who will not be loved nor taken care of etc. Let's not even dwell on the birth defect issues that could stem from incest too.
Extremists do want to ban ALL abortions, else they aren't extremists.
The law isn't as extreme as i though after reading, but still very alarming for what i listed, the font of my point doesn't stand corrected.
This isn't beyond the point? Would you then admit that what i said about people on both sides trying to depict the other side as extremists is false?
But yeah *i need to seek help* because i'm *insecure* and i have *half a brain* all the while stating first that i'm *dishonest at best*, then you go ahead and claimed i resorted to ad honimen? No, fucking, joke, after being insulted like that.
It's nice to see you are exempt of the criticism you hurl at others.
Edit: *I mean what kind of a douchebag would apply to mensa hahaha*
It's great to see you view mensa members as douchebags.
Btw James Wood and Tarantino are both members, I took an exemple from both sides so you are left with a dilemna.