Mix feelings with politics? What the hell are you talking about? Politics = feelings. You vote for a person who shares your feelings on important topics. That person speaks your voice in the parliament. That is the kind of democracy we have. There's no right or wrong in politics, if there were, we could just have a computer or a judge do it all for us.
Obviously feelings is not sitting and crying, or being angry, but feelings in this context is if I feel that wind energy is important enough that I think we should spend X billions on it. Voting is 100% feelings, nothing else.
Border control is not limiting the police force in Denmark - politicians are. Paludan cost is over 40m, not only 10m. Go look up what it cost to deal with FCK-BIF games, and there's +3 of those each year. This is what police does. They protect and serve. They keep us safe from criminals and idiots. Mostly idiots. Why is your argument here not that we should free up some money and spend 10% more on police a year? I would absolutely love it if we spent more on police.
"Med lov skal land bygges" - not - "med vold skal land bygges".
It's so fundamental for democracy and freedom of speech, that it pains me to see someone apparently interested in politics, not understanding this.
A society must not be ruled by fear. When you fear speaking up for yourself, then you no longer have a true democracy. It's so important that it cannot be said enough: YOU MUST NEVER BE AFRAID TO SPEAK YOUR MIND!
No matter how stupid your idea is, I don't care. You should NEVER be afraid to say it out loud. You should never be in need of police protection.
Go ask any politician. And I promise you they'd say I'm 100% right. You can say and do anything that is not against THE LAW. And the police will ALWAYS protect you.
And now that we have that settled, then you look at Paludan again. He's saying stupid things, in stupid places, to start trouble. Is he forcing someone else to spit on him, to threaten his life? No, he's not.
Any action against him is only one persons responsibility: The person doing it. It cannot and never will be Paludans responsibility.
That is the same as saying that a woman is responsible for being raped because she wore a short dress and makeup. It's fucking sickening! IT WILL ALWAYS BE THE ONE DOING THE CRIME WHO HAS TO PAY!
I'd also like to give you a little advice. It's very counter-productive to a good discussion to start it out with saying "you clearly know nothing about ...", instead of just trying to argue your case, put your thoughts into words, try and solve any miscommunication, and perhaps be a little understanding. Because in the end, there's always someone who knows more than you.
Ps. the police didn't start sucking ass because of Paludan. It's been like this for decades. When I was 16 or 17, I got my scooter stolen, and the police just told my mom, yeah okay fine, here's the report for the insurance, we don't care about this shit whatsoever. A few years ago I got a motorcycle stolen, Police haven't contacted me yet. And I gave them the fucking numberplates on the cars stealing it. Not stolen plates.