Either there is a language barrier here or you are seriously mentally inept. I just asked how admin "supervision" is a point. You aren't arguing anything. You are stating a known detail, like it's at all persuasive. Let me try to explain my point to you, as simply and succinctly as possible.
-He says that he doubts Flusha could have cheated, having played many tournaments
-I point out that is CLEARLY moronic and juvenile thinking, as NO ONE says he still cheats, and cheats every game
-you proceed to say "yeah but he had a point, that there are admins watching him play"
-I try to explain to you that a clever human could work around any admin "supervision", and that is a complete non-argument, because the question is whether he cheated, not whether you (random pleb) thinks it's possible to cheat on lan in 2019
-This hurts your precious ego
Do you understand now, how your comments are throwaway drivel, lacking any substance?
I love how people who are obviously out of their depth, in any form of discourse, always proceed to posture. Is this cognitive dissonance kicking in?